One Way Independent ANOVA Between subjects, one

independent variable and multiple levels

After setting up data sheet and entering data,
1. Analyze -> general linear model -> univariate
2. Move DV to dependent and IV to fixed factor
3. Options -> check these boxes Descriptive (to get descriptive stats),
Estimates of Effect Size (to get the effect size), Homogeneity of Variance.

4. Post Hoc TUKEY, press continue and PASTE run SYNTAX

(PLAY)
The main effect of IV ON DV was significant, F(2,27) = 43.99, p <.001, 2p = .77.

A one-way between-subjects ANOVA was conducted to compare the effect of

different types of distribution on time taken to complete a mechanical task.
There was a significant effect of type of disturbance on time taken to complete the
task [F (3, 36) = 7.40, p 0.001, 2 = 0.38].
Post hoc comparisons using the Tukey HSD test indicated that the mean time taken by
the control condition (M = 21.30, SD = 4.62) was significantly less than the noise (M
= 28.10, SD = 4.73, p 0.05), visual (M=30.60, SD = 2.88, p 0.001) and noise &
visual (M = 30.20, SD = 6.96, p 0.01) conditions. However, the noise, visual and
noise & visual conditions did not differ significantly, from each other.
Taken together, these results suggest that disturbance of any kind is likely to impair
performance on the task in question.
One Way Repeated-measures ANOVA same subjects doing
different conditions, one independent variable and multiple
levels
Each level of IV goes in separate columns AND FOR GRAPH, ADD
ALL THESE LEVELS TO THE Y-AXIS IN BAR GRAPHS
After setting up data sheet and entering data,
1. Analyze -> general linear model -> repeated measures
2. Write a factor name and add all your levels, then click DEFINE
3. Move variables to Within-Subjects Variables box
4. In Options, move factor over to Display Means for. select Bonferroni. Under
Display. Lastly, click on: Descriptive and Estimates of Effect Size

A one-way repeated measures ANOVA was conducted to test the effect of different
memory training techniques on the number of words recalled by participants at a
recall task. The main effect of levels of processing on the number of words recalled
was significant [F (3, 12) = 12.33, p.001, 2p = .76].

Follow up analysis using Bonferroni, showed there was a significant difference

between the control condition and the usage of stories for memory training. Usage of
stories led to better recall (M = 13.20, SD = 1.30) than the control condition (M =
10.00, SD = 1.58, p 0.05). There was no significant difference in the number of
words recalled between the control, imagery and rhyme conditions.
Two-Way Independant ANOVA between diff subjects, doing
different conditions, 2 independent variables and multiple
levels
Variable view must have columns for both IVs and the DV. Each row
is one person.
After setting up data sheet and entering data,
1. Analyze -> general linear model -> univariate
2. Move DV to dependent and the 2 IVs to fixed factor
3. Options -> move everything to display means for
4. check these boxes Descriptive (to get descriptive stats), Estimates of
Effect Size (to get the effect size), Homogeneity of Variance.

5. Post Hoc BONFERONNI, press continue and PASTE run

SYNTAX (PLAY)
A 2-way Independent ANOVA was conducted to see whether lack of
sleep and/or caffeine affected participants in their skill score.
The main effect of whether the participants slept for five hours, or
were deprived from sleep was non-significant, F(1,42) = 2.26, p =
0.14, 2p = .05. Therefore this factor did not have a significant
effect on driving skill score. The main effect of caffeine was also
non-significant, F(2,42) = 2.48, p = 0.10, 2p = .11. The interaction
between sleep and caffeine on skill score was significant, F(2,42) =
3.83, p=0.03, 2p = .15.
Further analysis using Bonferonni showed that participants who
slept for five hours and drank coffee (mean score = 6.25, SD = 1.83)
scored higher than participants who slept for five hours and drank
decaffeinated coffee (mean score = 4.125, SD = 1.25), and higher
than those who slept for five hours and drank nothing (mean score
= 4, SD= .76), all p<0.05. Participants who slept for five hours and
drank coffee (mean score =6.25, SD = 1.83) also had a significantly
higher score than participants who were sleep deprived and drank
coffee (mean score = 4, SD = 1.45) and participants who were sleep
deprived and drank nothing (mean score = 4.13, SD=.1.46), both
p<0.05. Overall the results showed coffee improved skill scores in
the five hour sleep condition, but not in the sleep deprivation
condition.
Simple effects analysis revealed that there was a significant
difference between those who sleep for five hours and those who
did not sleep at all when they drank coffee, p = .003. However,

there were no significant differences between those who slept for

five hours and those who did not sleep when drinking either
decaffeinated coffee (p = .73), or nothing (p = .86). Overall the
results showed coffee improved skill scores in the five hour sleep
condition, but not the in the sleep deprivation condition.
Two-Way Mixed ANOVA between divided subjects, doing
multiple conditions, 2 independent variables and multiple
levels
In data view, factors of an IV and division (ie.gender) should be
there
After setting up data sheet and entering data,
1. Analyze -> general linear model -> repeated measures
2. Write a factor name and add all your levels, then click DEFINE
3. Move scale variables to Within-Subjects Variables box and nominal
variable to Between-Subjects factor.
Click on Options, and move your factors over to Display Means for: Click on
Compare main effects and select Bonferroni from the drop-down box. Under
Display click on Descriptive Statistics, Estimates of effect size, and Homogeneity
tests
Click Continue.
REMEMBER TO RUN SYNTAX.

Check mauchlys if significant check greenhouse geisser value. If not

significant, check sphericity assumed value.

REPORT RESULTS.