Professional Documents
Culture Documents
I.
simulation;
FEA
model
INTRODUCTION
III.
RESEARCH METHOD
1461
SOP
9.2*6.3*1.6
10
DIP-6
8.9*6.4*3.0
V.
RESEARCH OBJECT
No.
Package
amount
shapemm
SMC
7.3*4.2*2.8
QFP
29.1*29.1*2.7
PGA
27.9*27.9*2.6
DIP-16
21.3*6.9*4.1
SOP
9.7*4.4*1.2
DIP-8
10.3*7.8*4.0
DFP
16.0*9.6*2.5
CFP
10.2*6.7*1.7
1462
B. Mesh Control
Controllable factors in meshing include: element types,
element size (grid density), and mesh method. ANSYSworkbench gives a powerful meshing. By different meshing,
the solving results are often different. If meshing is too
sparse, the error of results would be relatively large; while
too dense, it would cause a waste of computing resources.
The element type of the printed circuit board is selected for
shell181, for the reason that this type of shell elements can
be more efficient to draw hexahedral mesh, and the results
are more accurate. Mesh method use a combination of three
control methods: automatic, Multizone sweep method and
Hex dominant method to ensure the quality.
The following study will focus on the sensitivity analysis
of the element size. The natural frequency of the printed
circuit boards is affected by the change of the element size
independently. Comparing table is shown in Table 2, and
results are shown in Figure 3.
TABLE II.
No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
Element size
mm
10
5
4
3
2
1
Element
amount
1165
2352
3471
5778
12765
25285
1st order
frequencyHz
145.27
138.66
138.10
136.32
135.11
134.47
Figure 4.
TABLE III.
Model
Mass
block
Weldingband
1463
1
order(Hz)
140.0
2nd
order(Hz)
266.8
3rd
order(Hz)
331.1
Element
amount
13773
149.6
269.7
336.4
26793
TABLE V.
No.
1
2
3
4
5
Feature size
level
(mm)
29.1
21.3
15.9
8.9
7.3
Frequency
(Hz)
115.41
136.63
139.42
140.73
140.00
Feature
size ratio
(%
17.12
12.53
9.35
5.24
4.29
Absolute value of
frequency
error(Hz)
14.5
6.70
9.49
10.8
10.1
No.
Mass level
(g)
Frequency
(Hz)
1
2
3
4
5
10
7.2
1.1
1
0.3
115.41
135.11
138.68
139.80
140.00
Mass
ratio
(%)
4.59
3.30
0.50
0.46
0.14
Absolute value of
frequency
error(Hz)
14.5
5.18
8.75
9.87
10.1
Figure 7.
The curves of the mass ratio and the absolute value of the
frequency error are shown in Figure 6. It can be seen, the
first three frequency error curve are all shaped as a tub.
When mass ratio is near 3 percent, the error has a smallest
value. Through the mass ratio sensitivity analysis, we can get
component modeling principles on mass: keeping the
constant material parameters and uniform mesh method, the
choice of mass level is 3% of the total mass of printed circuit
1464
Order
1st
2nd
3rd
VI.
Modal tests
Hz
228.95
365.22
526.66
Simulation
Hz
213.4
375.58
552.3
CONCLUSIONS
Frequency
error(%)
6.79
2.84
4.87
REFERENCES
[1] M. Pecht and A. Dasgupta, Physics-of-failure: An
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
1465