Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CONTENTS
CHAPTER
TITLE OF CHAPTER
PAGE NO.
NO.
Contents
List of Tables
List of Graphs
1
2
List of Figures
Introduction
Recruitment and Selection
2.1 Definitions
2.2 History
2.3 Importance
2.4 Importance to worker and organization Factors
2.5 Workers role in Recruitment and Selection reasons
2.6 Factors
2.7 Reasons of low Recruitment and Selection
2.8 Effects Of Low Recruitment and Selection
2.9 Influences
Models of Recruitment and Selection
3.1Model of facet of Recruitment and Selection
3.2 Affect theory(Edwin A. Locke 1976)
3.3 Dispositional Theory( Timothy A. Judge 1988)
3.4 Two-Factor Theory (Motivator-Hygiene Theory)
3.5 Job Characteristics Model (Hackman & Oldham)
3.6 Modern method of measuring Recruitment and
Selection
3.7 Rating scale
3.8 Personal interviews
3.9 action tendencies
4.7 Chapterisation
Organizational profile
5.1 Company Profile
5.2 Vision & Missio
5.3 Our Objective
5.4 Allinace & Partnership
5.5 HCL Advantage
5.6 Technology Leadership
5.7 Philosophy of Quality
5.8 Quality At HCL Infosystems Ltd.
5.9 Manufacturing
6
7
LIST OF TABLES
TABLE
NO.
6.1
6.2
6.3
TITLE OF TABLE
Responses regarding whether the respondents are satisfied
with the workplace
Responses regarding whether the respondents are satisfied
with the infrastructure of organization
Responses regarding whether the respondents are satisfied
with the canteen facility provided by organization.
6.4
6.5
6.6
6.7
6.8
6.9
6.10
6.11
6.12
6.13
6.14
6.15
6.16
PAGE
NO.
6.17
6.18
6.19
6.20
6.21
6.22
6.23
LIST OF GRAPHS
GRAPHS
TITLE OF GRAPH
PAGE
4
NO.
Responses regarding whether the respondents are satisfied
with the workplace
Responses regarding whether the respondents are satisfied
with the infrastructure of organization
Responses regarding whether the respondents are satisfied
with the canteen facility provided by organization.
6.4
6.5
6.6
6.7
6.8
6.9
6.10
6.11
6.12
6.13
6.14
6.15
6.17
6.18
6.19
6.20
6.21
6.22
6.23
LIST OF FIGURES
FIGURE
NO.
1
2
NAME OF FIGURES
PAGE
NO.
CHAPTER NO.1
INTRODUCTION
INTRODUCTION
Recruitment and Selection in regards to ones feeling or state of mind regarding nature of
their work. Job can be influenced by variety of factors like quality of ones relationship
with their supervisor, quality of physical environment in which they work, degree of
fulfillment in their work, etc.
Positive attitude towards job are equivalent to Recruitment and Selection where as
negative attitude towards job has been defined variously from time to time.
In short
10
CHAPTER NO. 2
JOB SATISFACTION
11
Mr.
Smith
12
The term Recruitment and Selection was brought to lime light by hoppock (1935). He
revived 35 studies on Recruitment and Selection conducted prior to 1933 and observes
that Recruitment and Selection is combination of psychological, physiological and
environmental circumstances. That causes a person to say. I m satisfied with my job.
Such a description indicate the variety of variables that influence the satisfaction of the
individual but tell us nothing about the nature of Recruitment and Selection.
Recruitment and Selection has been most aptly defined by pestonjee (1973) as a job,
management, personal adjustment & social requirement. Morse (1953) considers
Recruitment and Selection as dependent upon job content, identification with the co.,
financial & job status & priding group cohesiveness
One of the biggest preludes to the study of Recruitment and Selection was the Hawthorne
study. These studies (1924-1933), primarily credited to Elton Mayo of the Harvard
Business School, sought to find the effects of various conditions (most notably
illumination) on workers productivity.
These studies ultimately showed that novel changes in work conditions temporarily
increase productivity (called the Hawthorne Effect). It was later found that this increase
resulted, not from the new conditions, but from the knowledge of being observed.
This finding provided strong evidence that people work for purposes other than pay,
which paved the way for researchers to investigate other factors in Recruitment and
Selection.
13
14
organizational, citizenship,
Absenteeism, Turnover.
Recruitment and Selection can partially mediate the relationship of personality
variables and deviant work behavior.
Common research finding is that Recruitment and Selection is correlated with life
style.
This correlation is reciprocal meaning the people who are satisfied with the life
tends to be satisfied with their jobs and the people who are satisfied their jobs
tends to satisfied with their life.
This is vital piece of information that is Recruitment and Selection and job
performance is directly related to one another. Thus it can be said that, A happy
worker is a productive worker.
It gives clear evidence that dissatisfied employees skip work more often and more
like to resign and satisfied worker likely to work longer with the organization.
15
Recruitment and Selection and occupational success are major factors in personal
satisfaction, self-respect, self-esteem, and self-development. To the worker, Recruitment
and Selection brings a pleasurable emotional state that can often leads to a positive work
attitude. A satisfied worker is more likely to be creative, flexible, innovative, and loyal.
For the organization, Recruitment and Selection of its workers means a work
force that is motivated and committed to high quality performance. Increased
productivity- the quantity and quality of output per hour worked- seems to be a byproduct
of improved quality of working life. It is important to note that the literature on the
relationship between Recruitment and Selection and productivity is neither conclusive
nor consistent.
However, studies dating back to Herzbergs (1957) have shown at least low
correlation between high morale and high productivity and it does seem logical that more
satisfied workers will tend to add more value to an organization.
Unhappy employees, who are motivated by fear of loss of job, will not give 100
percent of their effort for very long. Though fear is a powerful motivator, it is also a
temporary one, and also as soon as the threat is lifted performance will decline.
Recruitment and Selection benefits the organization includes reduction in
complaints and grievances, absenteeism, turnover, and termination; as well as improved
16
17
Hoppock, the earliest investigator in this field, in 1935 suggested that there are six major
components of Recruitment and Selection. These are as under:
The relative status in the social and economic group with which he identifies
himself
Security
Loyalty
Herberg, mausaer, Peterson and capwell in 1957 reviewed more than 150 studies and
listed various job factors of Recruitment and Selection. These are briefly defined one by
one as follows:
1. Intrinsic aspect of job
18
19
1. HIGH ABSENTEEISM
20
High
low
A
low
High
Fig.no. 1 Curve showing relationship between job satisfaction and rate of turn over
and absenteeism.
In the above diagram line AB shows inverse relationship between Recruitment and
Selection and rate of turn over and rate of absenteesm.
As th Recruitment and Selection is high the rate of both turn over and absentiseesm is
low and vise a versa.
2.HIGH TURNOVER
21
22
23
24
25
CHAPTER NO. 3
MODELS OF JOB SATISFACTION
26
27
Recruitment
and Selection: A Project report on HCL INFSOSYSTEMS LTD NOIDA.
Skill
Experience
Perceived personal
Training
job inputs
Efforts
Age
Seniority
Perceived
Education
amount that
Co loyalty
Perceived inputs
should be
Past
& outcomes of
received (a)
performance
referent others
Level
Difficulty
Time span
Amount of
responsibility
Perceived
outcome of
referent others
Actual
outcome
received
a=b
satisfaction
a>b
dissatisfaction
a<b guilt
Inequity
Discomfort
Perceived job
characteristics
Perceived
amount
received
(b)
28
29
30
31
Hackman & Oldham proposed the Job Characteristics Model, which is widely used as a
framework to study how particular job characteristics impact on job outcomes, including
Recruitment and Selection.
The model states that there are five core job characteristics (skill variety, task identity,
task significance, autonomy, and feedback) which impact three critical psychological
states (experienced meaningfulness, experienced responsibility for outcomes, and
knowledge of the actual results), in turn influencing work outcomes (Recruitment and
Selection, absenteeism, work motivation, etc.).
The five core job characteristics can be combined to form a motivating potential score
(MPS) for a job, which can be used as an index of how likely a job is to affect an
employee's attitudes and behaviors.
A meta-analysis of studies that assess the framework of the model provides some support
for the validity of the JCM.
32
In this method of measuring Recruitment and Selection the comparision between various
orgnizational terms and conditions at managerial level and also the orgnization at a large.
SATISFACTION WITH HUMAN RESOURCES MANAGEMENT POLICIES OF
THE ORGANIZATION:
1. Management has a clear path for employees advancement
2. Decisions are made keeping in mind the good of the employees
3. Management is extremely fair in personal policies
4. Physical working conditions are supportive in attaining targets
5. I nnovativeness is encouraged to meet business problems.
34
35
36
37
CHAPTER NO. 4
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
4.1 INTRODUCTION
38
39
To study the level of Recruitment and Selection among the employees of SEVA
Automotive Pvt. Ltd. if any.
40
41
CHAPTER NO. 5
ORGNIZATION PROFILE
42
ORGNIZATION PROFILE
COMPANY PROFILE
HCL INFOSYSTEMS LTD.
43
and solutions. The company has strategic alliances with world leaders for
voice and video conferencing solutions, TV and FM Broadcasting solutions
and for Imaging products and solutions to provide documentation products
like copiers, MFDs, Duprinters, laser printers and large format printers.
The Channel Business of HCL Infosystems has an extensive network of over
3000+ resellers across 900 locations. It has actively promoted the
penetration of PCs in the home and the small office/home office (SOHO)
segments.
HCL Infinet Ltd, 100% owned subsidiary of HCL Infosystems Ltd. is a class
A ISP focusing on providing the corporate networking services like Virtual
Private Network, Broadband Internet Access, Internet Telephony Hosting &
Co-location services, designing & deploying Disaster Recovery Solutions &
Business Continuity solution, Application Services, Managed Security
Services & NOC Services over its state-of-the-art IP / MPLS network and
end-to-end contact center solutions.
45
VISION STATEMENT
"Together we create the enterprises of tomorrow"
MISSION STATEMENT
"To provide world-class information technology solutions and
services to enable our customers to serve their customers
better"
QUALITY POLICY
"We shall deliver defect-free products, services and solutions
to meet the requirements of our external and internal
customers, the first time, every time"
OUR OBJECTIVES
46
CORE VALUES
HCL Advantage
HCL Infosystems (HCLI) draws it's strength from 30 years
48
Technology Leadership
HCL Infosystems is known to be the harbinger of technology
in the country. Right from our inception we have attempted to
pioneer the technology introductions in the country either
through our R&D or through partnerships with the world
49
technology
leaders.
Philosophy of Quality
"We shall deliver defect-free products, services and
solutions to meet the requirements of our external and
internal customers, the first time, every time."
50
Manufacturing
HCL's computer hardware manufacturing plants include 4
facilities, 2 at Puducherry, 1 at Chennai & 1 at Uttranchal.
53
55
57
58
HCL PRODUCTS
Consumer / Home & Home Office
59
Home PCs
Home Notebooks
.......................................................................................................................................................................................
.....
Business Desktops
Business Leaptops
Atom PC
Workstations
Servers
Fujitsu
.......................................................................................................................................................................................
.....
Business PCs
Business Notebooks
Business Workstations
Neutron PC
Servers
Thin Clients
.......................................................................................................................................................................................
.....
HCL
Keyboards,
display
Networking products & Racks and Kiosks
Peripherals
products,
Technology
products,
CORTONA3D PRODUCTS
.......................................................................................................................................................................................
.....
60
61
62
63
o
o
64
65
66
T3200
67
FREE DOS
1 GB DDR2 RAM
160 GB SATA Hard Disk Drive
Integerated Camera & Bluetooth
DVD Super Multi Drive
View More Details & Buy Now
68
69
SERVICES
IT
Consultancy
Infrastructure
...............................................
IT
Compliance
Management
Audit
&
Security,
Risk
...............................................
ERP
Consulting
&
Services
...............................................
Managed
Services
...............................................
Strategic
Services
Outsourcing
...............................................
Infostructure
Services
...............................................
System
Integration
...............................................
70
Infrastructure
...............................................
Facilities
Management
...............................................
VPN
Networking
&
(HCL
Managed
Infinet)
...............................................
HCL CDC
Infostructure Services
Offering a wide range of dependable Infostructure Solutions.
Facilities Management
Introducing innovative Facilities Management services for complete satisfaction.
System Integration
Bringing to you reliable System Integration Solutions and Services.
71
IT Infrastructure Consultancy
Benefit from our IT Infrastructure Consultancy and more
Networking Infrastructure
Introducing dependable Networking Infrastructure Services.
Managed Services
IOffering best in class Managed Services that you can depend upon.
Strategic Outsourcing
HCL offers world class Strategic Outsourcing Services to enterprises of all sizes.
HCL CDC
Equip yourself with the latest in IT by joining the HCL Career Development Centre.
Copyright 2009 HCL Infosystems Limited
HOME l ABOUT US l PRODUCTS l SERVICES l INVESTORS l CAREERS l SUPPORT l DISCLAIMER l SITEMAP l
CONTACT US
72
73
75
in a row in 2007
HCL has been awarded Ericsson's* Premium Partner
status for its enterprise products in 2007
HCL has been awarded the Platinum Partner
Certification for Video Conferencing Products from
Tandberg in 2007
HCL won 'Best Emerging Channel' award for Audio
System Integration from Polycom in 2007
HCL won awards in Environment Management and
Quality categories at the Elcina-Dun & Bradstreet
Awards for Excellence in Electronics, 2006-07.
HCL Infosystems Ranks No.1 in the Employee
Satisfaction in DQ-IDC Best Employer Survey 2007
HCL Infosystems Ranked Top 15 Best Companies to
Work for in India by TNS, Mercer and Business
Today 2007
Indias Most Preferred Personal Computer Brand
by CNBC AWAAZ Consumer Award 2007.
HCL received three Channels Choice 2007 awards
for Relationship Management, After Sales Support &
Commercial Terms from DQ Channels, based on an IDC
channel satisfaction survey.
HCL Infosystems won Brand-of-Excellence Award at
VARIndia Forum 2007.
HCL bagged IMM 'Top Organization Award 2007'
for Excellence at 34th World Marketing Congress.
HCL was awarded Amity Corporate Excellence
Award 2007 for its distinct vision, innovation,
competitiveness and sustenance.
HCL won Toshiba Colour Copier Champion Award
2007 for improving overall customer approach and
better technical capability.
HCL won the Best Indian Branded PC & Best IT
Retail Company award at the 6th VARIndia Star
Nite Awards 2007.
HCL has been recognized by Nokia, consecutively for
last two years with the Nokia Excellence Award for
Sales & Distribution, Asia Pacific 2007.
HCL Digilife retail chain won the 'Most Admired
76
77
78
CHAPTER NO. 6
DATA ANALYSIS AND
INTERPRETATION
79
80
81
No. Of respondents
31
49
12
5
3
Percentage
31
49
12
5
3
Graph 6.1
fie
tis
sa
is
yd
st
ro
n
gl
di
ss
tis
at
is
fie
fie
d
sa
sl
ig
ht
ly
sa
ti s
fie
fi e
at
is
ys
gl
st
on
no. of respondents
percentage
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
satisfaction level
Above table shows that 31% employees are strongly satisfied with their work place.
61% employees are satisfied with their workplace. It means ovZZZZer all 92%
employees are satisfied and other 18% are not satisfied with the work place.
82
Satisfaction level
Strongly satisfied
Satisfied
Slightly satisfied
Dissatisfied
Strongly dissatisfied
No. Of respondents
50
20
10
16
4
Percentage
50
20
10
16
4
Graph 6.2
83
50
40
30
no. of
respondents
20
10
d
fi e
tis
fie
gl
yd
is
sa
at
is
fie
ss
st
ro
n
ig
di
sa
tis
fie
tis
ht
ly
sa
sl
st
on
gl
ys
at
is
fi e
satisfaction level
Above table shows that 70% respondents are satisfied with infrastructure and 30% are
dissatisfied with infrastructure of HCL.
It can be interpreted that 30% are not satisfied with infrastructure which not more in
number.
6.3. Responses regarding whether the respondents are satisfied with the canteen
facility provided by organization.
Table 6.3
Satisfaction level
Strongly satisfied
Satisfied
Slightly satisfied
Dissatisfied
Strongly dissatisfied
No. Of respondents
56
17
16
9
3
Percentage
56
17
16
9
3
Graph 6.3
84
50
40
30
no. of respondents
20
10
d
fi e
tis
fie
sa
st
ro
n
gl
yd
is
ss
at
is
fie
tis
sa
ig
di
fie
tis
ht
ly
sa
sl
st
on
gl
ys
at
is
fie
satisfaction level
Above table shows that 88% employees are satisfied with the canteen facility provided by
the organization. Only 12% employees are not satisfied with canteen facility.
6.4.Responses regarding whether the respondents are satisfied with the
implementation of rules and responsibilities.
Table 6.4
Satisfaction level
Strongly satisfied
Satisfied
Slightly satisfied
Dissatisfied
Strongly dissatisfied
No. Of respondents
51
23
10
11
6
Percentage
51
23
10
11
6
Graph 6.4
85
50
40
30
no. of respondents
20
10
fie
d
sa
tis
fie
d
di
s
sa
t is
st
ro
ng
ly
di
s
sa
t is
fie
d
fie
d
sa
t is
ig
ht
ly
sl
st
on
gl
y
sa
tis
fie
d
satisfaction level
Above table shows that 84% employees are satisfied with implementation of rules and
responsibilities. And 16% of respondents are not seems to be satisfied with the
implementing rules and responsibilities.
6.5. Responses regarding whether the respondents are satisfied with the freedom
given at work.
Table 6.5
Satisfaction level
Strongly satisfied
Satisfied
Slightly satisfied
Dissatisfied
Strongly dissatisfied
No. Of respondents
30
36
14
16
4
Percentage
30
36
14
16
4
Graph 6.5
86
ie
d
st
ro
ng
ly
di
ss
at
is
f
at
is
ie
d
di
ss
sa
tis
f
ie
d
sa
tis
f
sl
ig
ht
ly
tis
f
sa
st
on
gl
y
f ie
d
no. of respondents
ie
d
percentage
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
satisfaction level
Above table shows that 80% respondents are happy with the freedom at work given by
management but only 20% of respondents are not satisfied with freedom given at wrk
place.
6.6. Responses regarding whether the respondents are satisfied with the team spirit
in organization
Table 6.6
Satisfaction level
Strongly satisfied
Satisfied
Slightly satisfied
Dissatisfied
Strongly dissatisfied
No. Of respondents
52
21
7
16
4
Percentage
52
21
7
16
4
Graph 6.6
87
50
40
30
no. of respondents
20
10
d
tis
fie
fie
d
st
ro
n
gl
yd
is
sa
at
is
fie
ss
tis
sa
ig
di
fie
tis
ht
ly
sa
sl
st
on
gl
ys
at
is
fi e
satisfaction level
Above table shows that 80% employees are satisfied with team sprit built in organization
and other employees are not satisfied with team spirit in the organization.
6.7 Responses regarding whether the respondents are satisfied with convenient
working hours
Table 6.7
Satisfaction level
Strongly satisfied
Satisfied
Slightly satisfied
Dissatisfied
Strongly dissatisfied
No. Of respondents
20
41
11
23
5
Percentage
20
41
11
23
5
Graph 6.7
88
sa
tis
fie
d
di
s
sa
t is
ro
ng
ly
di
s
st
sl
ig
ht
ly
sa
t is
fie
d
fie
d
sa
t is
sa
tis
on
gl
y
st
fie
d
no. of respondents
fie
d
percentage
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
satisfaction level
Above table shows that 20% employees strongly feels that the working hours decided by
organization are most convenient for them. Other 52% employees are satisfied with these
working hours. And only 28% employees are not much satisfied with the working hours.
6.8 Responses regarding whether the respondents are satisfied with Job security
Table 6.8
Satisfaction level
Strongly satisfied
Satisfied
Slightly satisfied
Dissatisfied
Strongly dissatisfied
No. Of respondents
13
18
11
12
46
Percentage
13
18
11
12
46
Graph 6.8
89
ie
d
st
ro
ng
ly
di
ss
at
is
f
at
is
f
ie
d
satisfaction level
di
ss
sa
tis
f
ie
d
tis
f
sa
sl
ig
ht
ly
sa
tis
f
st
on
gl
y
ie
d
no. of respondents
ie
d
percentage
50
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
Above table shows that only 31 % employees are satisfied with the job security. And
remaining 69% of employees are not satisfied with the job security provided by the
organization.
6.9 Responses regarding whether the respondents are satisfied with the targets
achievable
Table 6.9
Satisfaction level
Strongly satisfied
Satisfied
Slightly satisfied
Dissatisfied
Strongly dissatisfied
No. Of respondents
64
21
11
4
0
Percentage
64
21
11
4
0
Graph 6.9
90
50
no. of respondents
40
30
20
10
d
fie
tis
fie
sa
st
ro
n
gl
yd
is
ss
tis
sl
ig
di
sa
ht
ly
gl
st
on
at
is
fie
fie
ti s
sa
ys
at
is
fie
satisfaction level
Above table shows that 96% employees are strongly in favor that the targets given are
achievable and only 4% are not feels that the targets given are achievable.
6.10 Responses regarding whether the respondents are satisfied with the targets
achievable
Table 6.10
Satisfaction level
Strongly satisfied
Satisfied
Slightly satisfied
Dissatisfied
Strongly dissatisfied
No. Of respondents
9
22
4
20
45
Percentage
9
22
4
20
45
Graph 6.10
91
di
s
sa
t is
fie
d
ro
ng
ly
di
s
sa
t is
sa
t is
fie
d
fie
d
st
sl
ig
ht
ly
sa
t is
sa
tis
on
gl
y
st
fie
d
no. of respondents
fie
d
percentage
50
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
satisfaction level
v
Above table shows that only 35% employees are satisfied with the payment as per their
roles and responsibility and remaining 65% are not satisfied with the payment according
to their roles and responsibilities.
6.11. Responses regarding whether the respondents are satisfied with the
opportunities of promotions
Table 6.11
Satisfaction level
Strongly satisfied
Satisfied
Slightly satisfied
Dissatisfied
Strongly dissatisfied
No. Of respondents
8
14
6
26
46
Percentage
8
14
6
26
46
92
no. of respondents
st
on
gl
y
sa
tis
fie
d
sa
t
is
sl
fie
ig
ht
d
ly
sa
ti s
fi e
d
d
is
st
s
ro
a
ng
tis
fie
ly
d
di
ss
at
is
fi e
d
percentage
50
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
satisfaction level
Only 22% of the employees are satisfied with the opportunities of promotions given by
organization. And most of the employees nearly 78% are not satisfied with opportunities
of promotions.
6.12. Responses regarding whether the respondents are satisfied with the payment of
salary on time
Table 6.12
Satisfaction level
Strongly satisfied
Satisfied
Slightly satisfied
Dissatisfied
Strongly dissatisfied
No. Of respondents
44
16
4
32
4
Percentage
44
16
4
32
4
93
sa
tis
f
st
ro
ng
ly
sa
is
sl
f ie
ig
ht
d
ly
sa
tis
f ie
d
di
s
st
sa
ro
tis
ng
f ie
ly
d
di
ss
at
is
f ie
d
no. of respondents
ie
d
percentage
50
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
satisfaction level
Above table shows that 60% of employees are satisfied with the payment of salaries on
time. Only 40% of the employees are not much satisfied with the payment of salaries on
time.
6.13. Responses regarding whether the respondents are satisfied with the quality of
formal training and induction program
Table 6.13
Satisfaction level No. Of respondents
Strongly satisfied
42
Satisfied
36
Slightly satisfied
4
Dissatisfied
14
Strongly dissatisfied
4
Percentage
42
36
4
14
4
Graph 6.13
94
ie
Di
d
St
ss
ro
a
tis
ng
f ie
ly
di
d
ss
at
is
f ie
d
Sl
ig
ht
ly
Sa
tis
f
sa
tis
f
St
ro
ng
ly
sa
tis
f
ie
d
No. Of respondents
ie
d
percantage
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
satisfaction level
From the above table it shows that 76% of the respondents are satisfied with the quality
of training and induction program and only
6.14. Responses regarding whether the respondents are satisfied with the quality of
in-house training
Table 6.14
Satisfaction level
Strongly satisfied
Satisfied
Slightly satisfied
Dissatisfied
Strongly dissatisfied
No. Of respondents
51
19
6
20
4
Percentage
51
19
6
20
4
Graph 6.14
95
50
40
30
no. of respondents
20
10
sa
is
sl
f ie
ig
ht
d
ly
sa
tis
f ie
d
di
s
st
sa
ro
tis
ng
f ie
ly
d
di
ss
at
is
f ie
d
st
ro
ng
ly
sa
tis
f
ie
d
satisfaction level
Above table shows that 86% of the respondents are satisfied with in house training held
by the management. And only 24% of respondents are not satisfied with the quality of in
house training.
6.15. Responses regarding whether the respondents are satisfied with the period of
training
Table 6.15
Satisfaction level
Strongly satisfied
Satisfied
Slightly satisfied
Dissatisfied
Strongly dissatisfied
No. Of respondents
12
23
18
20
17
Percentage
12
23
18
20
17
96
Graph 6.15
20
15
no. of respondents
10
5
st
ro
ng
ly
sa
tis
f
ie
d
sa
sl
is
ig
f ie
ht
ly
d
sa
tis
f ie
di
st
d
ss
ro
at
ng
is
ly
f ie
di
d
ss
at
is
f ie
d
satisfaction level
Above table shows that 12% are strongly satisfied with the training program 41% of
respondents are satisfied with the period of training but 37% of respondents are not
satisfied with the period of training.
6.16 Responses regarding whether the respondents are satisfied with the proper and
proactive HR division
Table 6.16
Satisfaction Level
Strongly satisfied
Satisfied
Slightly satisfied
Dissatisfied
Strongly dissatisfied
No. Of Respondents
72
18
2
6
2
Percentage
72
18
2
6
2
97
sa
tis
f
st
ro
ng
ly
sa
sl
is
ig
f ie
ht
d
ly
sa
tis
f ie
d
di
ss
st
ro
at
ng
is
f ie
ly
d
di
ss
at
is
f ie
d
no. of respondents
ie
d
percentage
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
satisfaion level
Above table shows that 92% of the respondents are satisfied with the HR division
Only 8% of the respondents are not satisfied with the proactive and proper HR division,
which is very negligible in number.
6.17 Responses regarding whether the respondents are satisfied with the
performance appraisal system
Table 6.17
Satisfaction level
Strongly satisfied
Satisfied
Slightly satisfied
Dissatisfied
Strongly dissatisfied
No. Of respondents
Percentage
62
28
4
4
2
62
28
4
4
2
98
Graph 6.17
st
ro
ng
ly
di
ss
at
is
f
ie
d
ie
d
at
is
f
ie
d
di
ss
sa
tis
f
sa
is
f
sli
gh
tly
sa
tis
f
ng
ly
ro
st
ie
d
no. of respondents
ie
d
percentage
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
satisfaction level
Above table shows that 90% respondents are satisfied with the performance appraisal
system and only 10% of the respondents are not much satisfied with the performance
appraisal system implemented in organization.
6.18 Responses regarding whether the respondents are satisfied with the
performance appraisal system
Table 6.18
Satisfaction Level
Strongly Satisfied
Satisfied
Slightly Satisfied
Dissatisfied
Strongly Dissatisfied
No. Of Respondents
69
19
6
4
2
Percentage
69
19
6
4
2
99
Graph 6.18
at
is
f
ie
d
ie
d
ro
ng
ly
di
ss
at
is
f
ie
d
di
ss
st
sl
ig
ht
ly
sa
is
f
sa
tis
f
st
ro
ng
ly
sa
tis
f
ie
d
no. of respondents
ie
d
percentage
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
satisfaction level
Above table shows that the 69% of respondents are strongly satisfied with the office
events and parties organized by the organization. 25% of respondents are satisfied with
these events and only 6% of respondents are not satisfied with the events organized by
the management
6.19 Responses regarding whether the respondents are satisfied with the celebration
of employees birthday
Table 6.19
Satisfaction Level
Strongly Satisfied
Satisfied
Slightly Satisfied
Dissatisfied
Strongly Dissatisfied
No. Of Respondents
82
16
2
0
0
Percentage
82
16
2
0
0
100
Graph 6.19
ie
di
d
st
ss
ro
at
ng
is
f ie
ly
di
d
ss
at
is
f ie
d
ie
d
sa
tis
f
sl
ig
ht
ly
ie
d
sa
tis
f
st
ro
ng
ly
no. of respondents
sa
is
f
percentage
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
satisfaction level
Above table shows that nearly all the respondents are satisfied with the employees
birthday remembered and celebrated in the organization. No one seems to be dissatisfied
with the celebration of the employees birthdays.
6.20 Responses regarding whether the respondents are satisfied with forum for faceto-face communication
Table 6.20
Satisfaction Level
Strongly Satisfied
Satisfied
Slightly Satisfied
Dissatisfied
Strongly Dissatisfied
No. Of Respondents
18
22
9
37
14
Percentage
18
22
9
37
14
101
Graph 6.20
ie
di
d
st
ss
ro
at
ng
i
s
ly
f ie
di
d
ss
at
is
f ie
d
sa
tis
f
sl
ig
ht
ly
sa
is
f
sa
tis
f
ro
ng
ly
st
ie
d
no. of respondents
ie
d
percentage
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
satisfaction level
Above table shows that only 40% of the respondents are satisfied with the forum for faceto-face communication and remaining all the 60% of the respondents are not satisfied
with the forum for face-to-face communication.
6.21 Responses regarding whether the respondents are satisfied with encouragement
to employees suggestions
Table 6.21
Satisfaction Level
Strongly Satisfied
Satisfied
Slightly Satisfied
Dissatisfied
Strongly Dissatisfied
No. Of Respondents
8
32
19
25
26
Percentage
8
32
19
25
26
102
d
tis
fie
fie
sa
is
yd
st
ro
n
sl
gl
di
ss
tis
at
is
fie
fi e
ig
ht
ly
sa
sa
is
fie
at
is
st
ro
n
gl
ys
no. of respondents
percentage
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
satisfaction level
Above table shows that the overall 59% of the respondents are satisfied with the
encouragement given to the employees suggestions in management decision making and
remaining 41% of the respondents are not much satisfied with the encouragement given
to the suggestions of the employees.
6.22 Responses regarding whether the respondents are satisfied with positive
acceptance of employees suggestions
Table 6.22
Satisfaction Level
Strongly Satisfied
Satisfied
Slightly Satisfied
Dissatisfied
Strongly Dissatisfied
No. Of Respondents
4
22
4
45
25
Percentage
4
22
4
45
25
Graph 6.22
103
sa
tis
f
st
ro
ng
ly
sa
sl
is
ig
f ie
ht
d
ly
sa
tis
f ie
d
di
ss
st
ro
at
ng
is
f ie
ly
d
di
ss
at
is
f ie
d
no. of respondents
ie
d
percentage
50
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
satisfaction level
Above table shows that the 26% of the respondents are satisfied with the positive
acceptance of the suggestions given by the respondents but most of the respondents 70%
are dissatisfied with this point.
6.23 Responses regarding whether the respondents are satisfied with management
keeps promises
Table 6.23
Satisfaction Level
Strongly Satisfied
Satisfied
Slightly Satisfied
Dissatisfied
Strongly Dissatisfied
No. Of Respondents
76
14
4
6
0
Percentage
76
14
4
6
0
Graph 6.23
104
percentage
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
ie
di
d
ss
ro
a
ng
tis
ly
f ie
di
d
ss
at
is
f ie
d
ie
d
sa
tis
f
sa
is
f
st
sl
ig
ht
ly
st
ro
ng
ly
sa
tis
f
ie
d
no. of respondents
satisfaction level
Above table shows that 90% of the respondents are satisfied with the management keeps
promises and only 10% of the respondents are dissatisfied with the thing that the
management keeps promises.
From the analysis and interpretation, it is concluded that most of the employees
are satisfied with the workplace and only few employees are not satisfied with the
workplace, which are negligible in number. And similarly in case of infrastructure
105
It is concluded that near about all the employees are satisfied with implementation
of rules and responsibilities. And only some of them are not seems to be satisfied
with the implementing rules and responsibilities. Therefore it shows that
implementation of rule and responsibility is done fairly.
From the study it is clear that the higher percentage of employees are happy with
the freedom at work given by management but only some of them are not feeling
satisfied with the freedom given at work place.
According to analysis and interpretation, most of the employees are satisfied with
the team spirit built in organization and only few are not happy with team spirit in
the organization. From this it seems that the team spirit in the organization is
strong.
This study shows that only few employees strongly feel that the working hours
decided by organization are most convenient for them. Other is not in favor with
these working hours. So it is clear that the management kept the main
consideration about working conditions and the hours, which satisfies the
employees.
The study shows that very small numbers of employees are satisfied with the job
security. And remaining most of the employees are not satisfied with the job
security provided by the organization. Hence from this analysis it is cleared that
there is feeling of fear of job loss in the employees of HCL.
An analysis shows that employees are strongly in favor that the targets given are
achievable and only are not feels that the targets given are achievable. Hence the
targets set by management are achievable.
From the analysis it is concluded that very small number of employees are
satisfied with the payment as per their roles and responsibility and remaining all
are not satisfied with the payment according to their roles and responsibilities.
106
From the analysis and interpretation it is clear that very large number of the
respondents is satisfied with the quality of training and induction program and in
house training held by the management. And few are not satisfied with the quality
of in house training. But the period of training is not satisfactory to the
employees.
From the analysis it is clear that HR division is most satisfactory to all employees
only few are not satisfied with the HR division in the company.
In case of performance appraisal system and the office events and parties
organized by the organization near about all the employees are satisfied. The
birthdays of all the employees are remembered and celebrated in the organization.
It is concluded that the employees are not much satisfied with the forum for faceto-face communication. From the analysis it is clear that half of the employees are
satisfied and other half are not satisfied with the encouragement given to the
suggestions of the employees. But only few think that there is positive acceptance
of the suggestions given by the employees. From the analysis it is clear that
management keeps all the promises.
SUGGESTIONS
The suggestions are drawn from the analysis and observations. Few suggestions are given
as under:
In case of working hours decided by the organization are not convenient for the
employees of HCL INFOSYSTEMS LTD. NOIDA. The working hours are 10
107
The criteria for Job security is not much satisfactory so management have
concentrate on job security of employees so that they can work without fear of job
loss in the organization.
Opportunities of growth of employees are very less so that there can be employee
turnover hence management has to give emphasis on increasing the promotion
opportunities for according to the performance of employees.
From analysis we concluded that the period of in house training is very short that
is of only 3 days, which is not sufficient to get complete knowledge about the
work. Hence the training period should extend up to 5 days.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Books:
Pestonjee D. M.
Websites: www.hrcouncil.com
www.workforce.com
www.google.com
109