Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Available at www.sciencedirect.com
Review
article info
abstract
Article history:
Energy is a significant cost in the economics of desalinating waters, but water scarcity is
driving the rapid expansion in global installed capacity of desalination facilities. Conven-
tional fossil fuels have been utilized as their main energy source, but recent concerns over
27 December 2010
greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions have promoted global development and implementation of
energy minimization strategies and cleaner energy supplies. In this paper, a comprehensive
Keywords:
covers the utilization of energy efficient design, high efficiency pumping, energy recovery
Reverse osmosis
Nanotechnology
Renewable energy
deionization), and renewable energy resources (solar, wind, and geothermal). Utilization of
Energy recovery
energy efficient design combined with high efficiency pumping and energy recovery devices
Water sources
Contents
1.
2.
Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Minimization of energy usage for desalination processes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2.1. Enhanced system design . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2.2. High efficiency pumping . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2.3. Energy recovery . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2.4. Advanced membrane materials . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2.4.1. Nanocomposite membranes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
* Corresponding author. Tel.: 1 626 568 6002; fax: 1 626 568 6015.
E-mail address: Arun.Subramani@us.mwhglobal.com (A. Subramani).
0043-1354/$ e see front matter 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.watres.2010.12.032
1908
1908
1908
1910
1910
1910
1911
1908
3.
4.
5.
1.
w a t e r r e s e a r c h 4 5 ( 2 0 1 1 ) 1 9 0 7 e1 9 2 0
Introduction
1911
1912
1912
1912
1913
1913
1913
1913
1913
1915
1915
1916
1916
1916
1917
1917
1917
1917
and renewable energy alternatives are rapidly being developed, investigated and implemented around the globe
(Charcosset, 2009). Thus, providing an updated, comprehensive review of sustainable design and operational strategies to
reduce energy usage and GHG emissions is warranted. This
paper critically reviews in a holistic manner the latest developments and technologies for reducing energy consumption
by reverse osmosis desalination processes and addresses
strategies for integrating renewable energy as a source of
alternative clean energy supply. The paper is organized by
a discussion about energy minimization strategies for desalination followed by a discussion on the utilization of renewable energy resources to reduce GHG emissions.
2.
Minimization of energy usage for
desalination processes
Factors influential in minimizing energy usage in desalination
processes using RO membranes can be classified according to
enhanced system design, high efficiency pumping, energy
recovery, advanced membrane materials, and innovative
technologies. Each of these factors is described in more detail
below.
2.1.
w a t e r r e s e a r c h 4 5 ( 2 0 1 1 ) 1 9 0 7 e1 9 2 0
1909
1910
2.2.
w a t e r r e s e a r c h 4 5 ( 2 0 1 1 ) 1 9 0 7 e1 9 2 0
2.3.
Energy recovery
process that first converts the energy to centrifugal mechanical energy and then back to hydraulic energy. Most of the
seawater desalination plants in operation today use a Class I
type of ERD (Greenlee et al., 2009). When an ERD is used,
a fraction of the feed must bypass the primary high-pressure
pump and a booster pump is used to account for pressure
losses in the RO membrane modules, piping, and ERD
(Greenlee et al., 2009). The pressure or work exchanger (PWE) is
a Class I type of ERD. The pelton wheel, reverse running turbine
pump, and turbo charger are examples of a Class II type of ERD.
Efficiency greater than 95% can be achieved using a Class
I type of ERD (Greenlee et al., 2009). The PWE transfers the
hydraulic energy of the pressurized RO concentrate stream to
the RO feed water stream (Avlonitis et al., 2003; Stover, 2007).
PWE systems can be categorized as two types: those that
provide a physical barrier (piston) between the RO concentrate
stream and feed side of the system, such as a Dual Work
Exchanger Energy Recovery (DWEER), and those without
a physical barrier such as a Pressure Exchanger (PX) (Cameron
and Clemente, 2008; Mirza, 2008). In the case of a DWEER, the
system is based on moving pistons in cylinders which is well
suited for a wide range of water viscosities and densities, but
results in a large foot print (Mirza, 2008). A PX device has
higher efficiency since no transformational losses occur in the
device, but individual PXs have limited flow rates and
a higher capacity must be achieved by arranging several
devices in series. PX devices are also associated with very high
noise levels requiring a sound abatement enclosure (Mirza,
2008). Another disadvantage of a PX device is the degree of
mixing that occurs between the feed water and concentrate
stream. A feed salinity increase of 1.5%e3.0% caused by such
mixing will increase the required feed pressure for the RO
system (Wang et al., 2004, 2005).
Class 2 Centrifugal ERDs (such as the pelton wheel and turbo
charger) are limited in capacity and are usually optimized for
narrow flow and pressure operating conditions (Stover, 2004,
2007). The turbo charger is typically used in smaller capacity
RO installations (Oklejas et al., 2005). The reverse running
turbine pump is not suitable for a low flow range due to poor
efficiency (Mirza, 2008). The efficiency of commercial pelton
wheels can reach 90% (Stover, 2007). The overall efficiency of
the mechanically coupled reverse running turbine pump is in
the 75%e85% range. For the submersible generator type, the
overall efficiency is in the 62%e75% range (Mirza, 2008). The
efficiency of the turbo charger ranges from 55% to 60%.
2.4.
1911
w a t e r r e s e a r c h 4 5 ( 2 0 1 1 ) 1 9 0 7 e1 9 2 0
2.4.1.
Nanocomposite membranes
2.4.2.
Nanotube membranes
Principle
Energy consumption
Advantages
Drawbacks
Nanocomposite
Zeolite nanoparticles
incorporated in
polyamide matrix
creating enhanced
transport of water
molecules.
Nanotube
Transport of water
molecules through
structured carbon
and boron nitride
nanotubes.
Aquaporins used to
regulate transport of
water molecules.
Chemical compatibility
and structural
stability is not known.
Rejection of specific
contaminants is not known.
Long-term operational
data not available.
Only modeling results available.
Rejection of specific contaminants
is not known.
Biomimetic
Energy consumption
is not known.
1912
w a t e r r e s e a r c h 4 5 ( 2 0 1 1 ) 1 9 0 7 e1 9 2 0
2.4.3.
Biomimetic membranes
New developments have also occurred with the use of biomimetic membranes for desalination (Bowen, 2006). Biomimetic
membranes are designed to mimic the highly selective transport of water across cell membranes. Natural proteins known as
aquaporins are used to regulate the flow of water providing
increased permeability and high solute rejection. Aquaporins
act as water channels which selectively allow water molecules
to pass through while the transport of ions is restricted by an
electrostatic tuning mechanism of the channel interior. This
results in only water molecules being transported through the
aquaporin channels and charged ions being rejected (Sui et al.,
2001; Gong et al., 2007). Aquaporin membranes are considered
to be a hundred times more permeable than commercial RO
membranes with anticipated specific power consumption
savings of 70% of specific power consumption (AquaZ, 2010).
Highly permeable and selective membranes based on the
incorporation of the functional water channel protein Aquaporin Z into a novel triblock copolymer has been shown to have
significantly higher water transport than existing RO
membranes (Kumar et al., 2007). A particular difficulty with
biomimetic membranes that needs to be overcome is their
inability to withstand high operating pressures.
2.5.
Innovative technologies
2.5.1.
Forward osmosis
Principle
Energy
consumption
Forward osmosis
0.25e0.84 kWh/m3
(Cath et al., 2006; McGinnis
and Elimelech, 2007)
Ion concentration
polarization
Nanofluidics in
combination with
ion concentration
polarization utilized
to desalinate seawater.
Ions electrosorbed
by polarization of
electrode (carbon aerogels)
by a direct current
power source.
Capacitive
deionization
1.37e1.67 kWh/m3
(brackish water)
(Welgemoed, 2005).
Energy consumption
of seawater is not known.
Advantages
Lower energy consumption
than RO (McGinnis and
Elimelech, 2007). Lower
fouling potential than
RO due to absence of
transmembrane pressure
(Mi and Elimelech, 2010).
Lower energy consumption
than RO. Absence of
membranes and applied
pressure (Kim et al., 2010).
Lower energy consumption
than RO for brackish
water treatment (Oren, 2010).
Absence of membrane
and applied pressure.
Drawbacks
More applicable than
RO only when waste
heat source is
available (McGinnis
and Elimelech, 2007).
Full-scale operation
data is not available.
Process suited for
small and medium e
scale systems. Fullscale operational
data is not available.
Low feed water
recovery (Oren, 2010).
Full-scale operational
data not available.
w a t e r r e s e a r c h 4 5 ( 2 0 1 1 ) 1 9 0 7 e1 9 2 0
3.
2.5.2.
2.5.3.
1913
Capacitive deionization
Capacitive deionization technology is not a recent development, but several challenges with the identification of an
optimum material for the manufacturing of the associated
electrodes have delayed commercialization (Farmar et al., 1997;
Dermentzis and Ouzounis, 2008; Lee et al., 2009). This technology was developed as a non-polluting, energy efficient and
cost effective alternative to desalination technologies such as
RO (Welgemoed, 2005). In this technology, a saline solution
flows through an unrestricted capacitor type module consisting
of numerous pairs of high-surface area electrodes. The electrode material, typically a carbon aerogel, contains a high
specific surface area (400e1100 m2 per g) and a very low electrical resistivity. Anions and cations in solution are electrosorbed by the electric field upon polarization of each electrode
pair by direct current power sources. For desalination of
brackish water, energy consumption of 1.37e1.67 kWh/m3 has
been reported using this technology (Welgemoed, 2005). Energy
consumption for high salinity waters (such as seawater) is not
readily available in the literature. The main drawback with
capacitive deionization is that the feed water recovery
3.1.
Solar energy
3.1.1.
1914
w a t e r r e s e a r c h 4 5 ( 2 0 1 1 ) 1 9 0 7 e1 9 2 0
Wind
Geothermal
Application
Advantages
Disadvantages
w a t e r r e s e a r c h 4 5 ( 2 0 1 1 ) 1 9 0 7 e1 9 2 0
solar power (CSP) by the year 2050 (Trieb et al., 2009). Most
commercial CSP facilities use a system of curved mirrors to
collect the suns energy to heat a fluid flowing through tubes.
The hot fluid is then used to boil water in a conventional steamturbine generator to produce electricity. Concentrating solar
power typically uses a Dish/Sterling system. Other methods to
concentrate solar energy utilize a parabolic trough, solar tower,
or linear Fresnel (Trieb et al., 2009). Large mirror fields concentrate the sunlight to produce high temperature steam for power
generation that can be used for seawater desalination. Part of
the harvested solar thermal energy is used during the day and
conventional electricity is used during the night for continuous
operation.
3.1.2.
1915
Kalagirou, 2005). When electrical loads require an alternating voltage, an inverter is used to transform direct current
into alternating current. The batteries allow operation at
constant flow and pressure. They are sized to stabilize the
power supply to the RO unit on a daily basis, as well as to
account for fluctuations in solar energy and water demand.
Battery less PV-powered RO systems have been tested before
(Thomson and Infield, 2003) but certain disadvantages such as
longer operation in stand by mode needs to be overcome. It is
also common practice to connect PV systems to the local
electricity grid. During the day, the energy generated from the
PV systems is used directly from the grid and power is
utilized from the electricity grid at night. Thus, the grid acts as
an energy storage system.
3.2.
Wind energy
Wind has re-emerged as one of the most important and fastest growing sustainable energy resources since wind turbines
were first commercialized in the 1970s (Garca-Rodrguez,
2002; Ackermann and Soder, 2002). Wind turbines are
mature technologies and are commercially available. Windpowered desalination represents one of the most promising
renewable energy options for desalination, especially for
coastal areas with high availability of wind energy resources
(Zejli et al., 2004; Forstmeier et al., 2007).
After solar energy, wind energy is the most widely used
renewable energy source for small capacity desalination
plants (Kalagirou, 2005). The two common approaches for
wind-powered desalination systems include connecting both
the wind turbines and the desalination system to a grid, or
direct coupling of the wind turbines with the desalination
system (Ackermann and Soder, 2002). The latter option is
likely to be a stand-alone system at remote locations which
have no electricity grid. In this case, the desalination system
may be affected by power variations and interruptions caused
by the power source (wind). Hence, the stand-alone wind
desalination systems are often hybrid systems, combined
with another type of renewable energy source (for instance
solar), or a back-up system such as batteries or diesel generators (Mathioulakis et al., 2007). For stand-alone wind energydriven desalination units, the reported cost of fresh water
produced ranged from $1.35 per m3 to $6.7 per m3 when
compared to RO cost of about $1.0 per m3 (Karagiannis and
Soldatos, 2008; Mezher et al., 2011). The primary concern
with the use of wind energy for desalination is that wind
speed is highly variable. Wind speed varies both geographically and temporally and varies over a multitude of temporal
and spatial time scales (NREL, 2006). In terms of using a wind
turbine to generate power for desalination, this variation is
amplified by the fact that the available energy in the wind
varies as the cube of the wind speed (NREL, 2006). Thus, the
choice of location of the wind farm is critical for the exploitation of wind resources for power generation to ensure
superior economic performance.
The theoretical maximum aerodynamic conversion efficiency from wind to mechanical power for wind turbines is
59% (Kalagirou, 2005). The need to economize on blade costs
tends to lead to the construction of slender bladed, fast
running wind turbines with peak efficiencies close to 45%.
1916
w a t e r r e s e a r c h 4 5 ( 2 0 1 1 ) 1 9 0 7 e1 9 2 0
3.3.
Geothermal energy
3.4.
Hybrid systems
3.5.
Design and implementation of renewable energy
systems
Renewable energy desalination systems need to be designed
using an iterative approach (Voivontas et al., 2001). The first
step of the approach involves the definition of a list of alternative technologies that satisfy the water demand. A second
step focuses on a detailed design analysis of each candidate
option made to determine the plant capacity, the structure of
the power unit and the operational characteristics. The final
step involves a financial analysis of the investment associated
with the selected renewable energy-desalination combination.
The most challenging issue associated with the implementation of renewable energy-desalination technology is the
optimum matching of the intermittent renewable energy
power output with the steady energy demand of the desalination process. Power supply management and demand-side
management are considered as the two options available to
address this problem (Voivontas et al., 2001). In the first case, an
appropriately controlled hybrid renewable energy resource unit
that is capable of providing a steady energy output is used. This
unit is sized at the nominal power demand of the desalination
process. In the demand-side management option, the desalination process only operates when the energy output of the
renewable energy resource unit is able to cover the energy
demand.
Other options available to address the issue of intermittent
renewable energy power output are different types of energy
storage such as electro-mechanical, virtual (through process
modification), and grid energy (Kalogirou, 1997). Compressed
air energy storage plants have also been used when energy
produced from a wind turbine exceeds grid load capacity
(BINE, 2010). For limited periods, the compressed air stores
cover the short-term reserve requirement, which are needed
due to the unpredictable forecasts of wind power feeding the
grid. In this case, wind turbines do not have to deactivate in
the event of a grid overload, and if there is excess supply of
electrical energy, the storage technology refines base-load
electricity, converting it to peak-load electricity (BINE, 2010).
w a t e r r e s e a r c h 4 5 ( 2 0 1 1 ) 1 9 0 7 e1 9 2 0
4.
1917
5.
Conclusions
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the WateReuse Research
Foundation (WRRF) and the California Energy Commission
(CEC) for project funding (Project # WRRF-08 13).
Research needs
Minimization of the energy required for seawater RO desalination through utilization of efficient system design, high efficiency pumping, and energy recovery devices has been studied
extensively and near optimal performance characteristics have
already been tested and achieved. Further design improvements in these categories will only provide marginal reduction
in energy consumption further. Research avenues that show
the most promise for reducing energy usage lie in the development and testing of advanced membrane materials which
can enhance the performance of the membrane, in terms of flux
and rejection, and reduce feed pressure requirements. The
development of nanocomposite, nanotube, and biomimetic
membranes show promise but much more data are necessary
in order to validate the application of these membranes under
normal operation and chemical cleaning conditions. Innovative
technologies, such as forward osmosis, require a more efficient
recovery of the draw solution and methods to reduce internal
concentration polarization, inorganic scaling, and fouling of the
membrane. Similarly, the application of ion concentration
polarization and capacitive deionization technologies requires
further study in order to enhance feed water recovery to the
point where this technology might be economically feasible.
references
Ackermann, T., Soder, L., 2002. An overview of wind energystatus. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 6, 67e128.
Ahsan, A., Islam, K.M., Fukuhara, T., Ghazali, A.H., 2010.
Experimental study on evaporation, condensation and
production of a new tubular solar still. Desalination 260 (1e3),
172e179.
Al Malki, A., Al Amri, M., Al Jabri, H., 1998. Experimental study of
using renewable energy in the rural areas of Oman. Renewable
Energy 14, 319e324.
Ameku, K., Nagai, B.M., Roy, J.N., 2008. Design of a 3 kW wind
turbine generator with think airfoil blades. Experimental
Thermal and Fluid Science 32 (8), 1723e1730.
Anderson, M.A., Cudero, A.L., Palma, J., 2010. Capacitive
deionization as an electrochemical means of saving energy
and delivering clean water. Comparison to present
desalination practices: will it compete? Electrochemica Acta
55, 3845e3856.
Andrews, W.T., Laker, D.S., 2001. A twelve-year history of large
scale application of work exchanger energy recovery
technology. Desalination 138 (1e3), 201e206.
AquaZ, 2010. http://www.danfoss-aquaz.com/files/billeder/
Aquaporin_membrane.JPG (accessed 09.30.10).
1918
w a t e r r e s e a r c h 4 5 ( 2 0 1 1 ) 1 9 0 7 e1 9 2 0
Farmar, J.C., Tran, T.D., Richardson, J.H., Fix, D.V., May, S.C.,
Thomson, S.L., 1997. The application of carbon aerogel
electrodes to desalinate and waste treatment. Report No.
231717. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory.
Forstmeier, M., Mannerheim, F., DAmato, F., Shah, M., Liu, Y.,
Baldea, M., Stella, A., 2007. Feasibility study on wind-powered
desalination. Desalination 203, 463e470.
Garca-Rodrguez, L., 2002. Seawater desalination driven by
renewable energies: a review. Desalination 143, 103e113.
Gilau, A.M., Small, M.J., 2008. Designing cost-effective seawater
reverse osmosis system under optimal energy options.
Renewable Energy 33, 617e630.
Gleick, P.H., 2006. The Worlds Water 2006e2007, The Biennial
Report on Freshwater Resources. Island Press, Chicago.
Global Water Intelligence (GWI), 2010. Desalination Markets, 2010.
Gong, X., Li, J., Lu, H., Wan, R., Li, J., Hu, J., Fang, H., 2007. A chargedriven molecular water pump. Nature Nanotechnology 2,
709e712.
Greenlee, L.F., Lawler, D.F., Freeman, B.D., Marrot, B., Moulin, P.,
2009. Reverse osmosis desalination: water sources, technology,
and todays challenges. Water Research 43, 2317e2348.
Gude, V.G., Nirmalakhandan, N., Deng, S., 2010. Renewable and
sustainable approaches for desalination. Renewable and
Sustainable Energy Reviews 14 (9), 2641e2654.
Guillen, G., Hoek, E.M.V., 2009. Modeling the impacts of feed
spacer geometry on reverse osmosis and nanofiltration
processes. Chemical Engineering Journal 149 (1e3), 221e231.
Hilder, T.A., Gordon, D., Chung, S., 2009. Salt rejection and water
transport through boron nitride nanotubes. Small 5 (19),
2183e2190.
Hiriart, G., 2008. Geothermal energy for desalination seawater.
International Geological Congress, Oslo.
Hoek, E.M.V., Ghosh, A., 2009. Nanotechnology-based membranes
for water purification. Nanotechnology Applications for Clean
Water, 47e58.
Holt, J., Park, H.G., 2006. Fast mass transport through sub 2nanometer carbon nanotubes. Science 312 (5766), 1034e1037.
Infield, D.G., 2009. An overview of renewable energy technologies
with a view to stand alone power generation and water
provision. Desalination 248, 494e499.
Jacobson, M.Z., Delucchi, M.A., 2009. A Path to Sustainable
Energy. Scientific American, pp. 58e65.
Jeong,B.H.,Hoek,E.M.V.,Yan,Y.,Huang,X.,Subramani,A.,Hurwitz,G.,
Ghosh, A.K., Jawor, A., 2007. Interfacial polymerization of thin film
nanocomposites: a new concept for reverse osmosis membranes.
Journal of Membrane Science 294, 1e7.
Jia, Y., Li, H., Wang, M., Wu, L., Hu, Y., 2010. Carbon nanotube:
possible candidate for forward osmosis. Separation and
Purification Technology 75 (1), 55e60.
Kalagirou, S.A., 2005. Seawater desalination using renewable
energy sources. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science
31, 242e281.
Kalogirou, S.A., 1997. Survey of solar desalination systems and
system selection. Energy e The International Journal 22, 69e81.
Karagiannis, I.C., Soldatos, P.G., 2008. Water desalination cost
literature: review and assessment. Desalination 223, 448e456.
Karellas, S., Terzis, K., Manolakos, D., 2011. Investigation of an
autonomous hybrid solar thermal ORC e PV RO desalination
system. The Chalki island case. Renewable Energy 36 (2), 583e590.
Kiehl, J.T., Trenberth, K.E., 1997. Earths annual global mean
energy budget. Bulletin of the American Meteorological
Association 78, 197e208.
Kim, S.J., Ko, S.H., Kang, K.H., Han, J., 2010. Direct seawater
desalination by ion concentration polarization. Nature
Nanotechnology 5, 297e301.
Koutroulis, E., Kolokotsa, D., 2010. Design optimization of
desalination systems power-supplied by PV and W/G energy
sources. Desalination 258 (1e3), 171e181.
w a t e r r e s e a r c h 4 5 ( 2 0 1 1 ) 1 9 0 7 e1 9 2 0
Kumar, M., Grzelakowski, M., Zilles, J., Clark, M., Meier, W., 2007.
Highly permeable polymeric membranes based on the
incorporation of the functional water channel protein
Aquaporin Z. Proceedings of the National Academy of
Sciences 104 (52), 20719e20724.
Lee, J., Park, K., Yoon, S., Park, P., Park, K., Lee, C., 2009.
Desalination performance of a carbon-based composite
electrode. Desalination 237 (1e3), 155e161.
Loeb, S., Sourirajan, S., 1963. Seawater demineralization by
means of an osmotic membrane. Advances in Chemistry
Series 38, 117e132.
Long, B., 2008. Optimization of desalination for low energy.
Presentation at the Singapore International Water Week,
Singapore.
Macedonio, F., Drioli, E., 2010. An exergetic analysis of a membrane
desalination system. Desalination 261 (3), 293e299.
Manth, T., Gabor, M., Oklejas, E., 2003. Minimizing RO energy
consumption under variable conditions of operation.
Desalination 157 (1e3), 9e21.
Mathioulakis, E., Belessiotis, V., Delyannis, E., 2007. Desalination
by using alternative energy: review and state-of-the-art.
Desalination 203, 346e365.
McCutcheon, J., McGinnis, R.L., Elimelech, M., 2005. A novel
ammoniaecarbon dioxide forward (direct) osmosis
desalination process. Desalination 174 (1), 1e11.
McCutcheon, J., McGinnis, R.L., Elimelech, M., 2006. Desalination
by ammoniaecarbon dioxide forward osmosis: influence of
draw and feed solution concentrations on performance on
process performance. Journal of Membrane Science 278 (1e2),
114e123.
McGinnis, R.L., Elimelech, M., 2007. Energy requirements of
ammoniaecarbon dioxide forward osmosis desalination.
Desalination 207, 370e382.
McGinnis, R.L., McCutcheon, J., Elimelech, M., 2007. Forward
Osmosis Energy Use: Comparisons to RO, MSF, MED.
Presentation at North American membrane Society (NAMS)
annual Conference, April 14e17, Orlando, Florida.
Mezher, T., Fath, H., Abbas, Z., Khaled, A., 2011. Techno-economic
assessment and environmental impacts of desalination
technologies. Desalination 266 (1e3), 263e273.
Mi, B., Elimelech, M., 2010. Organic fouling of forward osmosis
membranes: fouling reversibility and cleaning without
chemical reagents. Journal of Membrane Science 348 (1e2),
337e345.
Mirza, S., 2008. Reduction of energy consumption in process
plants using nanofiltration and reverse osmosis. Desalination
224, 132e142.
Mohamed, E., Papadakis, G., 2004. Design, simulation and
economic analysis of a stand-alone reverse osmosis
desalination unit powered by wind turbines and
photovoltaics. Desalination 164, 87e97.
Murugavel, K.K., Srithar, K., 2011. Performance study on basin
type double solar still with different wick materials and
minimum mass of water. Renewable Energy 36 (2),
612e620.
Naim, M., Mervat, A., El-Kawi, A., 2003. Non-conventional solar
stills. Part I: non-conventional solar stills with charcoal
particles as absorber medium. Desalination 153, 55e64.
NanoH2O, 2010. Nanotechnology advances reverse osmosis
membrane performance. Available from: http://www.
nanoh2o.com/Technology.php5?categoryEconomics
(accessed 09.30.10).
National Academy of Sciences (NAS), 2010. Electricity from
renewable resources: status, prospects, and impediments. The
National Academy Press, Washington D.C.
National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), 2006. Integrated
wind energy/desalination system. Final Report SR500e39485.
1919
1920
w a t e r r e s e a r c h 4 5 ( 2 0 1 1 ) 1 9 0 7 e1 9 2 0
Weiner, D., Fisher, D., Moses, E.J., Katz, B., Meron, G., 2001.
Operation experience of a solar- and wind-powered
desalination demonstration plant. Desalination 137, 7e13.
Welgemoed, T.J., 2005. Capacitive Deionization Technology:
development and evaluation of an industrial prototype
system. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Pretoria.
Wilf, M., Bartels, C., 2005. Optimization of seawater RO systems
design. Desalination 173, 1e12.
Wilf, M., Hudkins, J., 2010. Energy Efficient Configuration of RO
Desalination Units. Proceedings of Water Environment
Federation Membrane Applications Conference, Anaheim,
California.
Yang, Q., Wang, K.Y., Chung, T.S., 2009. Dual-layer hollow fibers
with enhanced flux as novel forward osmosis membranes for
water production. Environmental Science and Technology 43
(8), 2800e2805.
Zejli, D., Benchrifa, R., Bennouna, A., Zazi, K., 2004. Economic
analysis of wind-powered desalination in the south of
Morocco. Desalination 165, 219e230.
Zhu, A., Christofides, P.D., Cohen, Y., 2009. Effect of
thermodynamic restriction on energy cost optimization of RO
membrane water desalination. Industrial and Engineering
Chemistry Research 48, 6010e6021.
Zhu, A., Christofides, P.D., Cohen, Y., 2009a. Minimization of
energy consumption for a two-pass membrane desalination:
effect of energy recovery, membrane rejection and retentate
recycling. Journal of Membrane Science 339, 126e137.
Zhu, A., Christofides, P.D., Cohen, Y., 2009b. Energy consumption
optimization of reverse osmosis membrane water
desalination subject to feed salinity fluctuation. Industrial and
Engineering Chemistry Research 48, 9581e9589.
Zhu, A., Christofides, P.D., Cohen, Y., 2009c. On RO membrane
and energy costs and associated incentives for future
enhancements of membrane permeability. Journal of
Membrane Science 344 (1e2), 1e5.
Zhu, A., Rahardianto, A., Christofides, P.D., Cohen, Y., 2010.
Reverse osmosis desalination with high permeability
membranes e cost optimization and research needs.
Desalination and Water Treatment 15, 256e266.
Zhu, A., Christofides, P.D., Cohen, Y., 2010a. Effect of stream
mixing on RO energy cost minimization. Desalination 261 (3),
232e239.