Professional Documents
Culture Documents
D.K. Paul
Emeritus Fellow, Department of Earthquake Engg., IIT Roorkee, Roorkee, 247667
dpaulfeq@gmail.com
INTRODUCTION
Every structure vibrates under external excitation. The response mainly depends on its
mass, stiffness, damping and boundary conditions. All of these parameters can be
expressed by a single parameter frequency f or time period T of vibration. A
structure may be idealized into single degree of freedom system (SDOFS) or a multidegree of freedom system (MDOFS). These idealized systems can then be analyzed
and its response to various excitations can be evaluated.
x
m
x
k
External Applied
Damping
force
f (t )
Load
f (t )
cx
Inertia Force
Restoring
force
c
(a) SDOFS
m x
kx
(b) Free body diagram
If x is the deflection of the mass then the spring/ restoring force will be k x acting
opposite to the motion producing a restoring force = k x . The damping force also acts
opposite to the motion and is assumed to be proportional to velocity of the moving mass
equal to c x , where c is the damping coefficient and x is the velocity of the vibrating
mass.
The inertia forces acting on the mass is the product of mass and absolute acceleration and
acts opposite to the motion.
Inertia force = m
d 2x
m x
dt 2
(1)
(2)
For undamped free vibration, the damping and external force will vanish and the equation
can be expressed as:
m x k x 0
(3)
k
rad/ sec
m
or
2
sec
p
or
1
T
c/ sec
(4)
The constants a and b are evaluated by applying the initial conditions i.e. at
t 0, x xo and x x o and the solution can be expressed as
x xo cos pt
x o
sin pt
p
(5)
m x c x k x 0
(6)
x e p t a cos ( p 1 2 ) t b sin ( p 1 2 ) t
(7)
Response
damping); Constants a and b are obtained from the initial conditions as explained
above. The above solution is oscillatory and decays exponentially as shown in Fig.2.
Time
Translation in X direction
(horizontal)
Tortional motion about Zaxis
Translation in X direction
(horizontal)
Translation in X direction
(horizontal)
Mass
(kN-sec2/m)
Stiffness
(kN/m)
Time period
(sec)
Time period
(sec)
(ETABS)
6.00
71112.0
0.0600
0.0610
58.00
597349.5
0.0620
0.0690
6.00
40000.0
0.0770
0.0790
6.00
4000000.0
0.0077
0.0077
x
k
c( x y ) k( x y) 0
mx
c( x y ) k( x y) 0
mx
(8)
or
m(
x )
y c( x y ) k( x y) my
or
cz kz my
mz
z 2pz p 2 z
y
(9)
where, z = x - y is the relative motion of mass with respect to ground, x is the absolute
motion of mass with respect to fixed base and y is the absolute acceleration of ground,
m, k and c are the mass, stiffness and damping of the SDOFS system, p
undamped natural frequency,
k
is the
m
c
is the fraction of critical damping or damping
2 mp
ratio. If the ground excitation is expressed as y y0 sin t then the response is worked
out as
z( t )
y 0
p2
1
(1 ) (2) 2
Defining, z st yo p 2
2 2
and
sin(t )
(10)
Therefore, the dynamic amplification w.r.t static deflection can be expressed as:
Dd
zm
1
2
2
z st
(1 ) (2 ) 2
(11)
z y (2 p z p 2 z )
y0
Da
1 (2 ) 2
(1 2 ) 2 (2 ) 2
(12)
sin(t ( 0 ))
1 (2 ) 2
z y
y
(1 2 ) 2 (2 ) 2
(13)
Figures 4 and 5 show the dynamic displacement and acceleration amplifications for
frequency ratios and damping ratios for sinusoidal excitation. Resonance
condition is observed when the excitation frequency matches with the natural
frequency of the system. In an earthquake, the damaging energy is carried by several
frequencies instead of only one frequency and therefore the motion is random in nature.
The response of the system to random excitation can be obtained using Green's
function, the solution of (9) gives,
Dd
Da
1
pd
y( )e
p ( t )
sin p d (t )d
(14)
Let
s v* y( )e p (t ) sin p d (t )d
0
max
Then, z max s d
(15)
1 *
s v (relative max. displacement response)
pd
(16)
p d p 1 2 p (Since << 1)
(17)
(18)
xmax s a p sv*
(19)
p sv p s d (Pseudo-velocity)
(20)
p s a p 2 s d (Pseudo-acceleration)
(21)
Period (sec)
Fig.6(a) Displacement, (b) Velocity and (c) Acceleration response spectra for
an earthquake ground motion
acceleration (g)
0.2
Northridge earthquake
0.1
0.0
-0.1
-0.2
0
10
time (sec)
15
20
M z C z K z M I y
(22)
where, M , C, K are the mass, damping and stiffness matrices of the structure and
z is the vector of independent relative displacements. The undamped free vibration
of multi degree freedom system can be expressed as
f4
x4
f3
x3
f2
z
x2
f1
x1
y
/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Fig.9 Four storey building and deflected shape
M z K z 0
(23)
z a e ipt
(24)
where, a is constant and is the mode shape vector and is given by:
T 1 , 2 n T
(25)
p2 M K 0
Various forms of above equation are as follows:
or
K p2 M
or
or
D p 2
(26)
K p2
(27)
or
p2
p2
D1
(28)
(29)
Which represent an Eigen value problem. Since the solution converges to highest value of
and eigen vector which is the mode shape or the characteristic shape. The matrix
iteration of (29) will converge to the highest value of p 2 or the highest value of
frequency of vibration.
Thus when the mass moves in a vertical direction, measurement of the static deflection
st enable us to compute the period and frequency of vibration of the system. It is not
necessary that we know the mass m or the spring constant k .
We seek solution of
K p2 I
K p2 I 0
(30)
(31)
K p 2 I 0
Let
or
z i i( r ) r
(32)
(33)
(34)
r 1
r p r2 r
m j (j r )
j 1
m j
m
j 1
(r ) 2
j
y C r y
(35)
m j (j r )
i 1
n
m j (j r )
j 1
1 t
y sin p r t d
pr o
(36)
zi
ir m j (j r )
r 1
j 1
m j
n
j 1
(r ) 2
j
z i( r )
xi( r )
i( r ) Cr S ar
max
max
1 t
y sin p r t d
pr o
1 (r )
i C r S vr 1( r ) C r S dr
pr
(37)
(38)
..
.(39)
///////////////////////////////
Fig. 10 - Mode shapes
z1
z2
z3
t1
t2
t3
Figure 10 shows the modes shape of vibration and Fig. 11 shows the combination of modal
response. Only first few modes are significant and contribute to the total response. Higher
modes response is small. This mode superposition is only applicable to linear problems.
For nonlinear problem the response is obtained by direct time integration.
REFEENCES
Dowric, David (2011), Earthquake Resistant Design and Risk Reduction, John Wiley &
Sons, Inc., UK
Kramer, S.L. (2008), Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering, Published by Dorling
Kindersley (India) Pvt. Ltd.
Mukherjee, S. & Gupta, V. K. (2004). Wavelet-based generation of spectrumcompatible time-histories. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 22 (2002)
799804