Professional Documents
Culture Documents
METHODS
592
ANATOMY
The shoulder is the most common region where ultrasoundguided MSK injection is applied because it is prone to injury
or attrition. Pain in the shoulder region can originate from various structures in the shoulder girdle, which is composed of
the scapula, the clavicle, and the proximal humerus, all acting as
a single biomechanical unit. From this, 3 joints (glenohumeral,
acromioclavicular, and sternoclavicular joints) and 2 gliding
planes (subacromial and scapulothoracic) provide the greatest
range of movement allowable of any joint in the body.10
Glenohumeral Joint
The GHJ is a synovial ball-and-socket joint composed of
a round humeral head and a relatively small, flat, pear-shaped
glenoid fossa. The glenoid cavity is widened and deepened by the
presence of a fibrocartilaginous rim, the glenoid labrum (Fig. 1).
Because only one third of the humeral head is covered by the
glenoid cavity, and the capsule is lax and thin, it allows the
shoulder the widest range of movement of all joints but confers
the shoulders inherent instability, making it susceptible to subluxation and dislocation.11Y13
The joint capsule is attached medially to the margin of
the glenoid cavity extending to the base of the coracoid process
and laterally to the anatomic neck of the humerus (Fig. 1). The
synovial membrane lines the capsule on its deep surface and
overlies the LHB tendon. From there, 3 recesses are formed: the
biceps tendon sheath anteriorly, the subscapularis recess medially, and the axillary pouch inferiorly (Fig. 2). The implication of
the biceps tendon sheath will be discussed later in the rotator cuff
interval. The stability of the GHJ is maintained by the ligaments,
the rotator cuff tendons, and the deltoid muscle. The glenohumeral ligaments (GHLs) are 3 weak bands of fibrous tissue
(superior GHL [SGHL], middle GHL, and inferior GHL) that
strengthen the front of the capsule. The coracohumeral ligament
&
Copyright 2011 American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
&
Target structures
Ultrasound
visualization of
target structures
Conventional or
existing technique
for injection
Level of difficulty*
Peripheral
Axial
MSK
Peripheral
soft tissue
Good to
moderate
Spine
Poor to
moderate
Bursa/joint/
tendon
Good to
moderate
Mostly blind
Image guided
IYII
IIYIII
Mostly
blind
I
(CHL) is a strong band of fibrous tissue arising from the coracoid process and inserting onto the greater and lesser tuberosities
to reinforce the capsule (Fig. 1).
Rotator Cuff
There are 4 rotator cuff muscles: subscapularis (SSC),
supraspinatus (SS), infraspinatus (IS), and teres minor (TMi)
muscles. The rotator cuff is a tight layer of tendons around the
GHJ on the anterior (SSC), superior (SS), and posterior (IS and
TMi) aspects of the shoulder (Fig. 3).14 It plays an important
role in stabilizing the humeral head in the shallow glenoid
fossa during the movement of the arm.
The SSC muscle originates from the anterior surface of the
scapular fossa and converges into a flat and wide tendon that
inserts onto the lesser tuberosity. The superficial fibers of the
tendon overlay the bicipital groove and reach the greater tuberosity, merging with the CHL and transverse humeral ligament.
The SS muscle originates from the SS fossa of the scapula,
passes beneath the acromion and coracoacromial ligament (CAL),
and inserts on the upper facet of the greater tuberosity (Fig. 4A).
The IS muscle originates from the IS fossa and converts into a
wide tendon that inserts on the greater tuberosity just posterior
and inferior to the SS tendon (Fig. 4B). The interface between IS
and SS is not well defined because the fibers of both tendons
intertwine, forming a continuum.10 The TMi muscles originates
from a narrow strip on the lateral border of the scapula and inserts onto the most caudal segment of the greater tuberosity, just
posterior and inferior to the IS muscle.
Acromioclavicular Joint
The ACJ is a small synovial joint located between the
concave medial end of the acromion and the convex lateral end
of the clavicle. It has a limited range of motion. The articular
surfaces are made up of hyaline cartilage and are separated by a
wedge-shaped fibrocartilaginous disk either partly or completely
(Fig. 6). The capsule of the ACJ is attached to the articular
margins and is reinforced by the superior, inferior, anterior, and
posterior acromioclavicular ligaments.24,25 Caudally, it also receives fibers from the CAL, which blends with the undersurface
of the ACJ. The coracoclavicular ligament, composed of the
conoid and trapezoid ligaments, anchors the lateral aspect of the
clavicle to the coracoid process (Fig. 1). Because the ACJ slopes
inferomedially, resulting in overriding of the clavicle on the
acromion, the coracoclavicular ligament plays a crucial role for
the vertical stability of the ACJ.24 The inferior surface of the joint
Fluoroscopy
CT Scan
Ultrasound
None to poor
+-++*
+++-++++
+
++
+
Excellent
Reliable
Excellent
++
+++++
j
++++
j
Excellent
Reliable
Good
j
++-+++
++-+++
j
+
Poor-good
Unreliable
593
Copyright 2011 American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
&
FIGURE 1. Glenohumeral joint showing various ligaments and the joint capsule. The anterior capsule is reinforced by the superior,
middle, and inferior GHL. The insert shows the articular surface, the glenoid process, and the labrum. Reprinted with permission
from usra.ca.
SONOANATOMY
Biceps Tendon and Rotator Cuff Interval
The LHB tendon is examined, with the patient sitting with
the arm placed in neutral or slight internal rotation position, the
elbow bent, and the palm facing up (Fig. 7A). A high-frequency
linear probe is used. Approximately at the level of coracoid
process, a short-axis view of the humerus reveals the greater and
lesser tuberosities and the bicipital groove where the LHB tendon is found. The greater tuberosity has a rounder look, whereas
the lesser tuberosity assumes a pointed shape (Fig. 7A). Tilting
of the probe is important (Fig. 7B), as the echogenicity of the
biceps tendon in this short-axis view is dependent on the angle
of the probe position (anisotropy). Doppler imaging of the area
reveals the ascending branch of the anterior circumflex artery,
which is usually on the lateral side of the tendon. In the bicipital
groove, the tendon is invested by its synovial sheath, and the
effusion at this level should be noted.
The LHB tendon runs a superomedial course and enters the
GHJ through the rotator cuff interval. To obtain a short-axis scan
FIGURE 2. The drawing of 3 main recesses of the joint (left): (A) the biceps tendon sheath, (B) the axillary pouch, (C) the subscapular
recess, and the corresponding radiographic (arthrogram) appearance (right). Reprinted with permission from usra.ca.
594
Copyright 2011 American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
&
Glenohumeral Joint
The GHJ is best examined on transverse scan by placing the
transducer over the IS tendon. The patient is placed in the sitting
or lateral position, with the ipsilateral arm touching the contralateral shoulder (Fig. 9A). A linear probe is typically used, with
the exception of patients of very high body mass index, and the
probe is placed in the long axis of the IS tendon caudal to the
scapular spine (Fig. 9A). With this probe position, the posterior
part of the humeral head, glenoid process, and labrum are visualized. Medial to the GHJ, the spinoglenoid notch is usually
visualized (Fig. 9B). The suprascapular nerve, accompanied by
suprascapular artery, curves around this notch to supply the IS
muscle in the IS fossa. A paralabral cyst associated with labral
tear can be found in this notch.
Acromioclavicular Joint
The joint can be simply reviewed with a high-frequency
linear probe over the joint in the coronal plane. The hypoechoic
FIGURE 4. A, Anterior view of the shoulder showing the subscapularis and SS muscles. The anterior portion of the deltoid muscle was
reflected to show the underlying rotator cuff muscle. B, Posterior view of the shoulder to show the IS and TMi muscle. The posterior
portion of the deltoid muscle was partially removed to show the underlying muscle. Reprinted with permission from usra.ca.
* 2011 American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine
595
Copyright 2011 American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
&
FIGURE 5. A, The anterosuperior view showing the rotator cuff interval, which is a triangular space between the tendons of subscapularis
(anterior) and SS (posterior) muscles and the base of the coracoid process. The roof is the CHL (ghosted) and the contents are the
LHB tendon (blue) and SGHL (green). B, The cut-out of the rotator cuff interval to show the content. The SGHL, a focal thickening of the
GHJ capsule, runs anterior to the tendon of the LHB initially (position a). The SGHL maintains a close relationship with the LHB tendon
and subsequently inserts into a small depression above the lesser tuberosity (position b), contributing to the biceps reflection pulley
(position c) to prevent the dislocation of the LHB tendon. Reprinted with permission from usra.ca.
Efficacy
596
Whereas the diagnostic role of ACJ injection is widely accepted,30 the role of steroid injection is less certain. Literature
search revealed 4 case series.33Y36 All supported the role of shortterm relief following ACJ steroid injection. In a retrospective
case series, 27 patients with isolated ACJ arthritis received steroid injections with landmark-based technique.35 Significant
pain relief and function improvement were achieved in 25 of
27 patients, with a mean duration of improvement of 20 days
(range, 2 hrs to 3 months). In another study, 18 patients with
isolated unilateral ACJ arthropathy were prospectively studied
2 weeks after the ACJ injections were performed under fluoroscopic guidance.36 All patients had pain relief at 2 weeks, with
mean pain score decrease from 7 of 10 to 3.6 of 10 (range, 2Y10
and 0Y8, respectively). The average duration of pain relief was
14.3 weeks (range, 8Y24 weeks). Bain et al33 performed ACJ
steroid injection in 44 patients with confirmation of needle placement with fluoroscopy, and the patients were followed up for an
* 2011 American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine
Copyright 2011 American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
&
FIGURE 7. A, Ultrasound image showing the presence of LHB tendon (asterisk) within the bicipital groove. The insert shows the position of
the patient and the linear ultrasound probe. Note that the LHB tendon appears hyperechoic. B, Ultrasound image similar to A with a
different tilt of the ultrasound probe. The image illustrates the anisotropy with the LHB tendon (asterisk) changed from a hyperechoic to
a hypoechoic structure. The insert shows the position of the probe and the corresponding anatomic structures underneath. C, By
moving the ultrasound probe more proximally along the orientation of the LGH tendon, a view of rotator cuff interval is shown.
The LHB tendon (asterisk) is always hyperechoic at this level and sandwiched between the SS tendon laterally and subscapularis tendon
medially. The CHL (arrowheads) forms the roof of the interval. The insert on the left shows the orientation and position of the probe, and
the insert on the right shows the probe position and the structures underneath it. GT indicates greater tuberosity; LT, lesser tuberosity;
SC, subscapularis. Reprinted with permission from usra.ca.
The literature supporting the use of image-guided injection is robust. In cadaveric study where the accuracy of injection
FIGURE 8. A, Ultrasound image of the SASDB. The SS tendon is seen attached laterally onto the greater tuberosity of the humeral head
(H). The insert on the left shows the position of the patient and the ultrasound probe; the one on the right shows the probe and the
structures underneath. The deltoid muscle shows the underlying SS muscle. B, Ultrasound image of the SS tendon when the arm is put in
the modified Crass position. Note that the portion of the SS tendon lateral to the acromion process is significantly increased by this
maneuver. The insert shows the position of the modified Crass position. H indicates humeral head; D, deltoid muscle. Line arrows outline
the peribursal fat of the SASDB. Reprinted with permission from usra.ca.
* 2011 American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine
597
Copyright 2011 American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
&
FIGURE 9. Ultrasound image of the posterior GHJ. The glenoid process and humeral head both appear as hyperechoic structures
with anechoic shadow. The insert on the top shows the position of the patient and the ultrasound probe, whereas the one below shows
the probe position and the structures underneath. B, Ultrasound image of the spinoglenoid notch by moving the ultrasound probe
slightly medially. The insert shows the position of the probe and the spinoglenoid notch, as well as the suprascapular neurovascular bundle.
H indicates humeral head; GP, glenoid process; SSN and SSA, suprascapular nerve and artery (line arrows in ultrasound image); SGN,
spinoglenoid notch (arrowheads). *Glenoid labrum. 0Articular cartilage of the humeral head. Reprinted with permission from usra.ca.
LHB Tendon
Overview
The main indication for injection around the LHB tendon
is biceps tendinopathy, which refers to a spectrum of pathology
ranging from inflammatory tendinitis to degenerative tendinosis.16 Inflammation of the LHB tendon within the bicipital
groove (primary biceps tendinitis) is uncommon.43 The vast majority of biceps tendinitis is accompanied by rotator cuff tear or
a SLAP (superior labrum anterior to posterior) lesion, as the
sheath of the LHB tendon is an extension of the synovium of the
GHJ and is closely associated with the rotator cuff (secondary
biceps tendinitis). A patient with biceps tendinitis presents with
anterior shoulder pain and tenderness over the bicipital groove.
Ultrasound is a useful tool that can reliably diagnose complete
rupture, subluxation, or dislocation of the LHB tendon but is not
reliable for detecting intraarticular partial-thickness tears (overall
specificity, 97%; sensitivity, 49%).44 Magnetic resonance arthrography is the preferred method for detecting intraarticular pathology of the biceps tendon.45
Efficacy
Despite the fact that steroid injection into the tendon sheath
is part of the recommended nonsurgical management (in addition to rest, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug, and physical
therapy) described in multiple reviews, no studies have been
published on efficacy.15,16,46 The LHB tendon is certainly a pain
generator in the anterior aspect of the shoulder receiving both
sensory and sympathetic innervations.47 Selective injections may
further aid diagnosis of shoulder pathology associated with LHB
tendinitis.48
FIGURE 10. Ultrasound image of the ACJ. The upper insert shows
the position of the probe and the patient, and the lower insert
shows the position of the probe and the structures underneath.
A indicates acromion process; C, clavicle. *Wedge shape
fibrocartilaginous disk. Arrowheads point to the superior joint
capsule. Reprinted with permission from usra.ca.
598
Copyright 2011 American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
&
Efficacy
FIGURE 11. The insert shows the position of the ultrasound probe
and the needle with the out-of-plane technique. The corresponding
ultrasound image shows the ACJ with the image of the needle
(solid arrow). The arrows outline the superior joint capsule.
Reprinted with permission from usra.ca.
of the anterior circumflex artery and the LHB tendon and thus
potentially avoids unintentional puncture of these structures.
Glenohumeral Joint
The use of intraarticular corticosteroid injections for shoulder disorders and shoulder pain has been the subject of multiple systematic reviews published between 1996 and 2007.57Y61
Some reviews examined shoulder disorders and shoulder pain as
a whole without interpreting their results on the basis of a specific diagnosis.57,59,60 The other reviews combined the results of
trials that used single and multiple injections in their treatment
of adhesive capsulitis.59,61 The most recent systematic review,
published in 2007, specifically examined the results of trials that
performed multiple injections of corticosteroids for adhesive
capsulitis.62 They included 9 randomized controlled trials, and
4 studies were rated as high quality. Three high-quality studies
showed a beneficial effect for the use of multiple corticosteroid
injections for adhesive capsulitis with outcome measures of pain
reduction, improved function, and increased range of shoulder
movement. They concluded that multiple injections were beneficial until 16 weeks from the date of the first injection. In terms
of multiple injections, their review supported that up to 3 injections were beneficial, but there was limited evidence that 4
to 6 injections were beneficial. The role of GHJ injection as part
of the conservative therapies for adhesive capsulitis needs to be
emphasized. Intraarticular steroid injection has been shown to
produce significant reduction in pain and disability after treatment with corticosteroid injections plus exercise versus exercise
alone.63
Although there is some evidence to support the use of intraarticular steroid injection in adhesive capsulitis, the role in the
conservative management of GHJ arthrosis is unclear. There are
no studies specifically addressing the efficacy in GHJ arthrosis.52 A recent practice guideline from the American Academy of
Overview
The main indication for GHJ injection is glenohumeral arthrosis and adhesive capsulitis. Glenohumeral arthrosis is characterized by progressive and irreversible articular destruction and
frequent involvement of the surrounding soft tissues.49 The exact
prevalence is not well documented.50 Primary osteoarthritis is
uncommon, and most of the causes of chondral damage are secondary to trauma, instability, postsurgical arthrosis, avascular
necrosis, inflammatory arthropathy, osteochondritis dissecans,
chondrolysis, and iatrogenic injury.50,51 In patients with shoulder
pain, glenohumeral arthrosis is an uncommon cause of pain compared with other more common pathologic conditions of the
shoulder. Thus, glenohumeral arthrosis is a diagnosis of shoulder pain by exclusion.50,51 Assessment with clinical examination and radiologic imaging has been discussed in a few excellent
reviews.50Y53
Adhesive capsulitis (frozen shoulder) is the other indication
for GHJ injection. The prevalence in the general population is
approximately 2% but increases with age and with the presence
of diabetes mellitus, hyperthyroidism, and hypertriglyceridemia.54
The condition is characterized by 3 phases: a painful phase lasting 3 to 8 months followed by an adhesive phase of progressive
stiffness, typically lasting 4 to 6 months, and the final resolution
* 2011 American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine
599
Copyright 2011 American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
600
&
Radiologic guidance provides excellent accuracy but exposes the patients to radiation.86Y90 Direct comparison between
ultrasound-guided and fluoroscopy-guided injections performed
by experienced radiologists had been investigated with excellent
accuracy in both groups (100%).86,87 Although both techniques
achieved the same success rate, ultrasound-guided technique
managed with higher first-attempt rate, less time spent, and
lower patient discomfort.87
Copyright 2011 American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
&
FIGURE 13. A, Posterior approach to the GHJ. The insert (left upper) shows the position of the ultrasound probe and the needle with
in-plane technique. The corresponding ultrasound image (right) is shown with the line representing the needle path, which was directed
between the free edge of the labrum (*) and the hypoechoic articular cartilage (&) of the humeral head (H). G indicates glenoid. Insert
in the lower left shows the anatomic drawing of the ultrasound image. B, Anterior approach to the GHJ. The insert (left upper) shows
the position of the ultrasound probe and the needle with in-plane technique. The corresponding ultrasound image (right) is shown
with the line representing the needle path, which was inserted from the lateral side of the probe aiming at the medial border of
the humeral head (H). CP indicates coracoid process. *Subscapularis tendon. Insert in the lower left shows the anatomic drawing of
the ultrasound image. Reprinted with permission from usra.ca.
subacromial steroid injections in rotator cuff disease. Their conclusion was that subacromial steroid injection is not efficacious
in the treatment of rotator cuff disease. It is important to note that
the injection techniques included in those 9 studies were all
blind injection, with the exception of 1 study in which x-ray
confirmation was performed in a portion of the patients. The
accuracy of x-rayYguided SASDB injection will be discussed
in the following section.
In a practical clinical setting, the subacromial injection is
usually performed in a multimodal approach with physiotherapy
or a rehabilitation protocol. A recent large, pragmatic, randomized controlled trial showed that the subacromial steroid injection decreased pain and improved functional outcome at 1 and
6 weeks, and there was no difference compared with exercise
alone at 3 and 6 months.102 The absence of long-term efficacy
is not uncommon for interventions of common MSK problems.
In examining results from recent high-quality randomized controlled trials for common MSK disorders, Foster et al103 found
no or very small differences in the effectiveness of different
approaches when based on long-term outcomes (6Y12 months).
This has been exemplified by the various shoulder injection
techniques described in the previous sections.
Efficacy
There are multiple reviews on the efficacy of SASDB injections for rotator cuff disease.58Y60,98Y101 Because of different
methodologies and inclusion criteria, the results of those reviews vary. One review incorporated a study that included an
injectable nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory medication among
other trials assessing the efficacy of steroid injections.101 Another included articles that either did not specifically address
rotator cuff pathology or had critical methodological flaws.98
Two other reviews appraised the efficacy of steroid injection for
several shoulder conditions.59,60 The Cochrane review was updated only until 2003.58 The systematic review performed by
Koester et al100 is the most recent review that included 9 randomized controlled trials specifically appraising the use of
601
Copyright 2011 American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
The imaging methods used for validation were mostly by xray,69,107,109 although MRI105,112 and ultrasound104 were also used.
Mathews and Glousman111 found that x-ray was an unreliable
method in confirming the location of contrast in the subacromial
space when the result was validated with cadaver dissection.
Ultrasound-guided injection was validated with MRI in one
study, and the accuracy was 100%.112 The use of the ultrasoundimaging technique in the diagnosis of the rotator cuff disease
has been extensively investigated, and the reliability is comparable with that from MRI.112Y115
With the landmark-based approach, the injectate was
found in deltoid muscle, SS tendon, SC muscle, GHJ, and
ACJ.37,105Y107,111 The accurate location of steroid in the
SASDB correlated with superior outcome in the short
term106,108 and in the intermediate term (2Y6 weeks).69,106 There
are 3 studies comparing the pain and functional outcome between the ultrasound-guided injection and blind injection groups
without validating the location of the injectate in the blind
groups.116Y118 Hashiuchi et al117 found a better pain score in the
ultrasound group at 30 minutes, and Ucuncu et al118 showed superior pain and functional outcome at 6 weeks in the ultrasound
group, whereas Chen et al did not demonstrate a difference.116
&
CONCLUSIONS
Application of ultrasound for shoulder injection is increasingly popular. Ultrasonography allows accurate localization
of the various target structures for shoulder injections and realtime guidance of the needle insertion. A good understanding of
the anatomy and sonoanatomy is of paramount importance in
performing the ultrasound-guided injections.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors thank Qing Huang for her exceptional medical
drawings and Alex Yeung and Cyrus Tse for their assistance with
the illustration and photography.
REFERENCES
1. Peng P, Narouze S. Ultrasound-guided interventional procedures in
pain medicine: a review of anatomy, sonoanatomy and procedures.
Part I: non-axial structures. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2009;34:458Y474.
2. Narouze S, Peng PWH. Ultrasound-guided interventional procedures in
pain medicine: a review of anatomy, sonoanatomy and procedures.
Part II: axial structures. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2010;35:386Y396.
3. Breivik H, Collett B, Ventafridda V, Cohen R, Gallacher D. Survey
of chronic pain in Europe: prevalence, impact on daily life and
treatment. Eur J Pain. 2006;10:287Y333.
4. Brooks PM. The burden of musculoskeletal disease: a global
perspective. Clin Rheumatol. 2006;25:778Y781.
5. McBeth J, Jones K. Epidemiology of chronic musculoskeletal pain.
Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2007;21:403Y425.
6. AIUM Practice Guideline for the Performance of the Musculoskeletal
Ultrasound Examination. Laurel, MD: American Institute of
Ultrasound in Medicine (AIUM). Available at: http://www.aium.org/
publications/guidelines/musculoskeletal.pdf. Accessed January 10, 2011.
7. American College of Rheumatology Musculoskeletal Ultrasound Task
Force. Ultrasound in American Rheumatology Practice: report of the
American College of Rheumatology Musculoskeletal Ultrasound
Task Force. Arthritis Care Res. 2010;62:1206Y1219.
8. Klauser AS, McNally E, Chhem RK. Training musculoskeletal
ultrasound specialists: European education and clinical guidelines:
work in progress. In: Deven T, Hibbert KM, Chhem RK. The Practice
of Radiology Education. Challenges and Trends. Berlin, Germany:
Springer-Verlag; 2010.
9. Naredo E, Bijlsma JWJ, Conaghan PG, et al. Recommendation for
the content and conduct of European League Against Rheumatism
(EULAR) musculoskeletal ultrasound courses. Ann Rheum Dis.
2008;67:1017Y1022.
10. Bianchi S, Martinoli C. Shoulder. In: Bianchi S, Martinoli C.
Ultrasound of the Musculoskeletal System. Berlin, Germany:
Springer-Verlag; 2007.
FIGURE 14. The insert on the left shows the position of the
ultrasound probe and the needle with the in-plane technique.
Note that the medial end of the ultrasound probe is placed over
the acromion (Acr). However, in a patient with a slim body
build, the probe can be placed in another orientation as shown
in the right insert. The ultrasound image on the left shows the
needle (arrowheads) inserted with in-plane technique to the
SASDB, as highlighted by the peribursal fat (line arrows). The
image on the right shows the presence of local anesthetic
following the injection, with the separation of the deltoid muscle
(D) and SS tendon. Reprinted with permission from usra.ca.
602
11. Berquist TH, Peterson JJ. Shoulder and arm. In: Berquist TH. MRI of
the Musculoskeletal System. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams
and Wilkins; 2006.
12. Iannotti JP, Gabriel JP, Schneck SL, et al. The normal glenohumeral
relationships. An anatomical study of one hundred and forty
shoulders. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1992;74:491Y500.
13. Totterman SM, Miller RJ, Meyers SP. Basic anatomy of the shoulder
by magnetic resonance imaging. Top Magn Reson Imaging.
1994;6:86Y93.
14. DeFranco MJ, Cole BJ. Current perspectives on rotator cuff anatomy.
Arthroscopy. 2009;25:305Y320.
Copyright 2011 American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
&
15. Ahrens PM, Boileau P. The long head of biceps and associated
tendinopathy. J Bone Joint Surg. 2007;89-B:1001Y1009.
16. Nho SJ, Strauss EJ, Lenart BA, et al. Long head of the biceps
tendinopathy: diagnosis and management. J Am Acad Orthop Surg.
2010;18:645Y656.
17. Jost B, Koch PP, Gerber C. Anatomy and functional aspects of the
rotator interval. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2000;9:336Y341.
18. Petchprapa CN, Beltran LS, Jazrawi LM, Kwon YW, Babb JS, Recht
MP. The rotator interval: a review of anatomy, function, and normal
and abnormal MRI Appearance. AJR. 2010;195:567Y576.
19. Krief OP. MRI of the rotator interval capsule. AJR.
2005;184:1490Y1494.
20. Kim KC, Rhee KJ, Shin HD, Kim YM. Modified single-portal type II
SLAP repair. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2008;128:1251Y1254.
21. Snyder SJ. Shoulder Arthroscopy. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott
Williams & Wilkins; 2003.
22. Lewis JS. Rotator cuff tendinopathy. Br J Sports Med.
2009;43:236Y241.
23. Bureau NJ, Dussault RG, Keats TE. Imaging of bursae around the
shoulder joint. Skeletal Radiol. 1996;25:513Y517.
24. Buttaci CJ, Stitik TP, Yonclas PP, Foye PM. Osteoarthritis of the
acromioclavicular joint: a review of anatomy, biomechanics, diagnosis,
and treatment. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;83:791Y797.
25. Mazzocca AD, Arciero RA, Bicos J. Evaluation and treatment of
acromioclavicular joint injuries. Am J Sports Med. 2007;35:316Y329.
26. Crass JR, Craig EV, Feinberg SB. Ultrasonography of rotator cuff
tears: a review of 500 diagnostic studies. J Clin Ultrasound.
1988;16:313Y327.
48. Tallia AF, Cardone DA. Diagnostic and therapeutic injection of the
shoulder region. Am Fam Physician. 2003;67:1271Y1278.
52. McCarron JA. Shoulder arthritis and the young patient. Curr Orthop
Pract. 2009;20:382Y387.
33. Bain GI, van Riet RP, Gooi C, Ashwood N. The long-term efficacy of
corticosteroid injection into the acromioclavicular joint using a
dynamic fluoroscopic method. Int J Shoulder Surg. 2007;1:104Y107.
34. Hossain S, Jacobs LGH, Hashmi R. The long-term effectiveness
of steroid injections in primary acromioclavicular joint arthritis:
a five-year prospective study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg.
2008;17:535Y538.
35. Jacob AK, Sallay PI. Therapeutic efficacy of corticosteroid
injections in the acromioclavicular joint. Biomed Sci Instrum.
1997;34:380Y385.
36. Kurta I, Datir S, Dove M, Rahmatalla A, Wynn-Jones C, Maffulli N.
The short-term effects of a single corticosteroid injection on the
range of motion of the shoulder in patients with isolated
acromioclavicular joint arthropathy. Acta Orthop. Belg.
2005;71:656Y661.
37. Partington PF, Broome GH. Diagnostic injection around the shoulder:
hit and miss? A cadaveric study of injection accuracy. J Shoulder
Elbow Surg. 1998;7:147Y150.
603
Copyright 2011 American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
&
75. Kim JS, Yun JS, Kim JM, et al. Accuracy of the glenohumeral injection
using the superior approach: a cadaveric study of injection accuracy.
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;89:755Y758.
94. Sher JS, Uribe JW, Posada A, Murphy BJ, Zlatkin MB. Abnormal
findings on magnetic resonance images of asymptomatic shoulders.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995;77:10Y15.
604
96. Wolff AB, Sethi P, Sutton KM, Covey AS, Magit DP, Medvecky M.
Partial-thickness rotator cuff tears. J Am Acad Orthop Surg.
2006;14:715Y725.
97. Kuhn JE. Exercise in the treatment of rotator cuff impingement:
a systematic review and a synthesized evidence-based rehabilitation
protocol. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2009;18:138Y160.
98. Goupille P, Sibilia J. Local corticosteroid injections in the treatment
of rotator cuff tendinitis (except for frozen shoulder and calcific
tendinitis). Groupe Rhumatologique Francais de lEpaul (G.R.E.P.).
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 1996;14:561Y566.
99. Grant HJ, Arthur A, Pichora DR. Evaluation of interventions for
rotator cuff pathology: a systematic review. J Hand Ther.
2004;17:274Y299.
Copyright 2011 American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
&
100. Koester MC, Dunn WR, Kuhn JE, Spindler KP. The efficacy of
subacromial. corticosteroid injection in the treatment of rotator cuff
disease: a systematic review. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2007;15:3Y11.
102. Crawshaw DP, Helliwell PS, Hensor EMA, Hay EM, Aldous SJ,
Conaghan PG. Exercise therapy after corticosteroid injection
for moderate to severe shoulder. pain: large pragmatic randomised
trial. BMJ. 2010;340:c3037.
112. Rutten MCJM, Maresch BJ, Jager GJ, Blickman JG, van Holsbeeck
MT. Ultrasound of the rotator cuff with MRI and anatomic
correlation. Eur J Radiol. 2007;82:427Y436.
103. Foster NE, Dziedzic KS, van der Windt DA, Fritz JM, Hay EM.
Research. priorities for non-pharmacological therapies for common
musculoskeletal problems: nationally and internationally agreed
recommendations. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2009;10:3.
104. Rutten MJ, Maresch BJ, Jager GJ, de Waal Malefijt MC. Injection
of the subacromial-subdeltoid bursa: blind or ultrasound-guided?
Acta Orthop. 2007;78:254Y257.
105. Henkus HE, Cobben LP, Coerkamp EG, Nelissen RG, van Arkel ER.
The accuracy of subacromial injections: a prospective randomized
magnetic resonance. imaging study. Arthroscopy. 2006;22:277Y282.
106. Naredo E, Cabero F, Beneyto P, et al. A randomized comparative
study of short-term response to blind injection versus
sonographic-guided injection of local corticosteroids in patients
with painful shoulder. J Rheumatol. 2004;31:308Y314.
107. Yamakado K. The targeting accuracy of subacromial injection
to the shoulder: an arthrographic evaluation. Arthroscopy.
2002;18:887Y891.
108. Kang MN, Rizio L, Prybicien M, Middlemas DA, Blacksin MF.
The accuracy of subacromial corticosteroid injections: a comparison
of multiple methods. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2008;17:61SY66S.
109. Park JY, Siti HT, KS O, Chung KT, Lee JY, Oh JH. Blind subacromial
injection. from the anterolateral approach: the ballooning sign.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2010;19:1070Y1075.
605
Copyright 2011 American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.