Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Tianjin State Key Laboratory of Modern Chinese Medicine, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin 300193, China
Tianjin Key Laboratory of Phytochemistry and Pharmaceutical Analysis, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin 300193, China
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Received 9 May 2015
Received in revised form 18 August 2015
Accepted 19 August 2015
Available online 24 August 2015
Keywords:
Phenolic acids
Berberine
Chlorogenic acid
Jinqi Jiangtang tablet
LCMS
a b s t r a c t
A rapid, sensitive and selective high performance liquid chromatographytandem mass spectrometry
(LCMS/MS) method was developed and validated for the simultaneous determination of four phenolic
acids (neochlorogenic acid, chlorogenic acid, cryptochlorogenic acid and ferulic acid) and seven alkaloids (berberine, epiberberine, coptisine, magnoorine, berberubine, palmatine and jatrorrhizine) in rat
plasma. After mixing with the internal standards tetrahydropalmatine (IS1 ) and rosmarinic acid (IS2 ),
plasma samples were pretreated by protein precipitation using acetonitrile. The HPLC analysis was performed on an Agilent Eclipse plus C18 (4.6 mm 100 mm, 1.8 m) column with mobile phase consisting
of 0.1% formic acid aqueous solution and acetonitrile at a ow rate of 0.3 mL min1 . The detection was
accomplished for the analytes and internal standards using positive electrospray ionization for the alkaloids and negative electrospray ionization for the phenolic acids in multiple-reaction monitoring mode.
The method showed a good linearity over a wide concentration range (r2 > 0.99). The lower limit of
quantication of seven alkaloids was lower than 2 ng mL1 and that of four phenolic acids was less than
20 ng mL1 . The developed method was applied to the pharmacokinetic study of 11 components after
oral administration of traditional Chinese medicinal preparation Jinqi Jiangtang Tablet in rats.
2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
Traditional Chinese medicines (TCMs) have been used as an
important resource for the prevention and treatment of various diseases for more than 1000 years [1]. Typically, TCMs have different
kinds of components. It is well known that multiple components
act on multiple targets and exert synergistic therapeutic efcacies,
which are the unique mechanism of action of TCMs [2]. Nowadays,
more and more attention has been focused on the active components from TCMs. The pharmacokinetic study on active components
in TCM could have a great effect on evaluating the mechanism of
action to better elucidate the efcacy of TCMs.
Traditional Chinese medicinal preparation Jinqi Jiangtang (JJT)
Tablet consists of three herbal plants: Coptis chinensis (rhizome
Corresponding author at: Tianjin State Key Laboratory of Modern Chinese Medicine, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, China.
Fax: +86 25 59596163.
E-mail address: Tcmcyx@126.com (Y.-x. Chang).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpba.2015.08.030
0731-7085/ 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Y.-x. Chang et al. / Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis 117 (2016) 110
2. Experimental
2.4. Content of the 11 components in JJT tablet
2.1. Chemicals and reagents
Acetonitrile of MS-grade was purchased from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany) and methanol (Tianjin Concord Science Co. Ltd.,
Tianjin, China) were of HPLC grade. HPLC-grade formic acid was
purchased from Tedia Company Inc. (Tedia, Faireld, OH, USA).
Deionized water was puried with a Milli-Q Academic ultra-pure
water system (Millipore, Milford, MA, USA). Reference Standards
of chlorogenic acid, cryptochlorogenic acid, neochlorogenic acid,
ferulic acid, magnoorine, coptisine, epiberberine, jatrorrhizin
hydrochloride, berberine hydrochloride, berberubine and palmatine hydrochloride (purity > 98%) were purchased from Chengdu
Must Biotechnology Co. Ltd. (Chengdu,China). traditional Chinese medicinal preparation Jinqi Jiangtang Tablet was obtained
from Tianjin pharmacy (Tianjin, China). Voucher specimens were
deposited at the Institute of Traditional Chinese Medicine (Tianjin university of Traditional Chinese Medicine). All other reagents
were of analytical grade and obtained commercially.
The contents of berberine, epiberberine, coptisine, magnoorine, berberubine, palmatine, jatrorrhizine, cryptochlorogenic
acid, chlorogenic acid, cryptochlorogenic acid, neochlorogenic acid
and ferulic acid in JJT tablet for oral administration were determined by the established LCMS/MS method. The powder of JJT
tablet (0.10 g) was extracted with 10 mL 70% methanol and ultrasonicated for 40 min according to previous research [15]. After
centrifugation at 14,000 rpm for 10 min, the supernatant was ltered through a 0.22 m membrane lter. At last, an aliquot of
2 L of supernatant was injected into the LC-ESIMS/MS system.
Finally, the contents of berberine, epiberberine, coptisine, magnoorine, berberubine, palmatine, jatrorrhizine, chlorogenic acid,
cryptochlorogenic acid, neochlorogenic acid and ferulic acid were
20.8, 5.5, 8.33, 0.22, 0.10, 3.48, 8.70, 27.4, 1.49, 1.17 and 0.19 mg g1
in traditional Chinese medicine JJT tablet, respectively.
2.5. Plasma sample preparation
Plasma samples were pretreated employing a simple protein
precipitation with acetonitrile. After thawing to room temperature,
100 L of the rat plasma was mixed with 10 L of the IS working
solutions containing tetrahydropalmatine (50 ng mL1 ) and rosmarinic acid (100 ng mL1 ) and 10 L of formic acid. The mixture
was vortex-mixed for 1 min and then 400 L acetonitrile was added
and centrifuged for 10 min at 14,000 rpm. Supernatant was trans-
Y.-x. Chang et al. / Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis 117 (2016) 110
Table 1
Source and SRM parametersof 11 compounds and two internal standards (IS).
Compounds
CUR
CAD
IS
TEM
GS1
GS2
Q1
Q3
DP(V)
EP(V)
CE(V)
CXP(V)
Neochlorogenic acid
Chlorogenic acid
Cryptochlorogenic acid
Ferulic acid
Magnoorine
Coptisine
Epiberberine
Jatrorrhizin
Berberine
Palmatine
Berberubine
Tetrahydropalmatine (IS1)
Rosmarinic acid (IS2)
30
30
30
30
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
30
4
4
4
4
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
4
4500
4500
4500
4500
5000
5000
5000
5000
5000
5000
5000
5000
4500
500
500
500
500
600
600
600
600
600
600
600
600
500
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
30
30
30
30
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
30
353.0
353.0
353.1
192.9
343.3
320.1
337.2
339.3
337.3
353.1
323.2
356.2
359.1
191.1
191.0
190.7
133.9
266.3
292.1
320.1
323.2
321.1
337.2
308.1
192.2
161.1
33
33
33
35
45
45
58
55
45
55
52
45
35
5
5
5
5
5
6
4
5
4
5
7
5
5
33
25
22
22
30
40
42
39
40
33
37
40
23
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
4
3
3
2
5
Y.-x. Chang et al. / Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis 117 (2016) 110
Fig. 2. The chromatograms of the analytes in rat plasma: blank plasma (A), blank rat plasma spiked with standard compounds (B) and plasma samples taken from rats 30 min
after oral administration of traditional Chinese medicinal preparation Jinqi Jiangtang (C).
before extraction to those of analytes from solutions spiked in postextracted blank plasma at equivalent concentration.
The matrix effect is dened as the ion suppression/enhancement
on the ionization of analytes, which was measured via comparison
of the peak response from post extraction blank plasma samples
spiked with standard solutions at three levels in three replicates to
those of the corresponding concentration neat standard solutions.
The same procedure was applied for IS at a single concentration.
The matrix effect is not negligible if the ratio is less than 85% or
more than 115%..
2.6.5. Stability
The stability of analytes in plasma was investigated by analyzing
QC samples at four concentrations. The autosampler 24 h stability
was assayed after keeping the treated sample under autosampler conditions (room temperature) for 24 h. The QC samples were
subjected to three freeze (at about 20 C) to thaw (at room temperature) cycles for freeze and thaw stability. The stability was
expressed as RSD and accuracy. The long-term stability was examined by analyzing samples stored at about 80 C for 1 month.
For all stability testing of QC samples, the concentration was
compared with those of freshly prepared QC samples and the per-
Table 2
The calibration curves,linearity range,LLOQs of the assay(n = 6).
Compounds
Regression equation
Neochlorogenic acid
Chlorogenic acid
Cryptochlorogenic acid
Ferulic acid
Magnoorine
Coptisine
Epiberberine
Jatrorrhizin
Berberine
Palmatine
Berberubine
Y = 0.00566X + 0.236
Y = 0.173X + 0.492
Y = 0.0229X + 0.0414
Y = 0.0803X + 0.129
Y = 0.00706X 0.000419
Y = 0.0154X + 0.0154
Y = 0.0206X + 0.00792
Y = 0.019X + 0.000988
Y = 0.0201X + 0.0201
Y = 0.021X + 0.000668
Y = 0.0447X + 0.00429
0.9966
0.9954
0.9917
0.9944
0.9944
0.9917
0.9909
0.9900
0.9984
0.9963
0.9926
Linearity range
20-7500
0.4-150
20-7500
4-1500
2-250
0.2-75
0.08-30
0.16-60
0.04-15
0.04-15
0.09-30
LLOQ
(ng mL1 )
20
0.4
20
4
2
0.2
0.08
0.16
0.04
0.04
0.08
Y.-x. Chang et al. / Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis 117 (2016) 110
Table 3
Intra-day, inter-day accuracy and precision (n = 6).
Compounds
Concentration
(ng mL1 )
Neochlorogenic
acid
20
60
600
6000
0.4
1.2
12
120
20
60
600
6000
4
12
120
1200
2
6
60
600
0.2
0.6
6
60
0.08
0.24
2.4
24
0.16
0.48
4.8
48
0.04
0.12
1.2
12
0.04
0.12
1.2
12
0.08
0.24
2.4
24
Chlorogenic
acid
Cryptochlorogenic
acid
Ferulic
acid
Magnoorine
Coptisine
Epiberberine
Jatrorrhizin
Berberine
Palmatine
Berberubine
Intra-day
Inter-day
Accuracy (%)
RSD(%)
Accuracy()
RSD(%)
108
101
105
103
99.7
107
105
105
91.2
103
100
102
110
107
106
95.9
93.6
103
103
99.1
104
107
104
101
108
107
112
95.6
103
101
98.2
102
80.5
103
120
103
111
110
115
107
80.0
101
103
93.6
6.06
4.94
3.82
2.68
13.5
7.61
8.31
5.97
12.2
3.77
4.27
3.61
15.0
6.25
6.55
6.35
17.4
5.16
2.75
3.71
9.67
9.90
6.01
6.41
14.4
15.0
11.0
7.55
13.9
5.94
3.16
4.93
15.4
14.6
15.0
7.40
4.47
15.0
14.5
7.71
11.3
14.4
4.46
7.89
118
99.7
102
102
115
104
103
103
118
102
99.8
101
99.8
103
102
98.9
103
100
100
101
95.9
103
98.7
100
107
105
104
99.5
118
93.8
99.6
100
93.2
110
109
102
117
112
106
104
95.0
104
100
98.7
16.2
1.45
2.37
0.93
7.75
2.80
1.70
2.37
14.0
2.67
0.65
0.98
15.1
3.43
3.55
2.52
16.4
1.97
1.58
0.86
8.38
3.95
6.88
0.79
11.9
2.11
7.47
3.46
13.1
13.8
1.47
1.67
5.70
9.89
8.75
2.01
12.8
2.46
7.02
2.23
14.2
5.44
2.37
4.63
dose in rat is 1.31 g/kg. Therefore, the JJT extract at 1.31 g kg1
(suspended in 0.5% carboxymethyl cellulose sodium salt aqueous solution) was administrated orally to the rats. Blood samples
(about 200 L) were collected before dosing and at 5, 10, 15, 30,
45 min, 1, 1.5, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24 h after administration from the
fossa orbitalis of rats. After centrifugation at 7000 rpm for 10 min
at 4 C, the samples were immediately transferred into heparinized
tubes. The plasma was stored frozen at about 80 C until analysis.
Y.-x. Chang et al. / Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis 117 (2016) 110
Table 4
Recoveries and matrix effects of 11compounds (n = 6).
Compounds
Concentration
(ng mL1 )
Neochlorogenic
acid
20
60
600
6000
0.4
1.2
12
120
20
60
600
6000
4
12
120
1200
2
6
60
600
0.2
0.6
6
60
0.08
0.24
2.4
24
0.16
0.48
4.8
48
0.04
0.12
1.2
12
0.04
0.12
1.2
12
0.08
0.24
2.4
24
Chlorogenic
acid
Cryptochlorogenic
acid
Ferulic
acid
Magnoorine
Coptisine
Epiberberine
Jatrorrhizin
Berberine
Palmatine
Berberubine
Recovery
Matrix effect
Mean (%)
RSD(%)
Mean(%)
RSD(%)
89.4
105
85.5
100
98.1
105
110
95.1
87.4
101
81.2
89.9
80.1
85.8
80.0
105
92.6
94.9
108
100
96.4
91.4
106
86.4
91.5
95.8
105
81.8
91.6
105
106
90.1
88.2
91.4
106
86.4
91.3
99.0
92.4
88.0
118
86.7
93.0
99.7
5.38
9.02
11.6
6.65
9.03
5.20
5.56
4.53
8.25
6.95
6.81
13.9
2.40
13.5
8.99
5.69
14.7
14.4
11.8
13.3
4.93
14.6
10.2
8.95
11.6
15.0
14.7
15.0
14.0
12.5
12.2
5.28
12.5
15.1
5.49
14.1
11.1
15.0
7.57
13.2
15.8
12.5
14.4
6.76
115
103
91.7
83.4
97.8
100
100
104
113
95
104
91.7
118
104
91.9
80.9
109
82.2
92.2
84.4
96.4
88.5
79.9
81.1
84.9
95.4
76.7
84.0
97.5
101
88.9
94.2
115
96.8
80.8
94.5
98.1
96.6
89.5
96.6
107
81.5
79.3
82.2
6.23
14.1
11.7
12.6
12.4
8.42
8.42
5.99
5.90
13.2
11.9
7.68
7.27
7.75
10.2
14.8
13.9
14.2
13.9
15.3
3.14
14.8
12.1
6.55
14.7
8.44
14.5
14.9
10.9
8.05
12.6
14.5
12.3
13.9
14.2
12.9
11.4
13.4
14.1
9.47
10.6
10.9
12.3
8.15
mean residence time (MRT) were also calculated. The values were
expressed as mean SD.
Sample preparation is a critical step for developing an accurate and reliable LC-ESI MS/MS method to eliminate interference
from the sample matrix and achieve satisfactory recovery. In order
to extract the target analytes from biological uids more effectively, we used the liquidliquid extraction (LLE) with ethyl acetate
method. However, matrix effects of some analytes were lower
than 50% which could not meet the analysis requirements. Compared with above methods, protein precipitation with acetonitrile
(PPA) was found to offer satisfactory recovery and desired extract
efciency in determining the concentrations of the analytes. In
addition, PPA was much simpler and less time-consuming than LLE
with ethyl acetate. In order to improve the extraction efciency,
Y.-x. Chang et al. / Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis 117 (2016) 110
Table 5
Stability of the 11 analytes (n = 6).
Compounds
Concentration
(ng mL1 )
Neochlorogenic
acid
20
60
600
6000
0.4
1.2
12
120
20
60
600
6000
4
12
120
1200
2
6
60
600
0.2
0.6
6
60
0.08
0.24
2.4
24
0.16
0.48
4.8
48
0.04
0.12
1.2
12
0.04
0.12
1.2
12
0.08
0.24
2.4
24
Chlorogenic
acid
Cryptochlorogenic
acid
Ferulic
acid
Magnoorine
Coptisine
Epiberberine
Jatrorrhizin
Berberine
Palmatine
Berberubine
At 80 C for 1 month
Freeze-thaw cycles
Autosampler for 24 h
Accuracy(%)
RSD(%)
Accuracy(%)
RSD(%)
Accuracy(%)
RSD(%)
96
100
101
100
88.5
100
96.9
99.0
87.3
102
100
99.3
119
102
99.4
99.0
112
100
98.9
98.3
102
99.4
99.0
99.9
105
94.4
104
97.3
97.8
97.9
96.1
95.6
86.8
95.6
99.2
101
120
104
99.9
102
91.8
94.4
97.4
95.1
13.2
1.56
2.31
2.40
14.8
3.39
6.05
5.00
19.4
7.36
7.28
4.43
8.69
4.02
5.32
1.30
13.8
8.50
2.60
1.62
11.8
3.30
2.25
5.52
14.3
7.01
9.54
10.8
17.0
1.90
8.88
9.19
12.0
10.0
7.87
2.37
9.26
8.39
6.00
4.40
6.95
7.01
5.41
9.10
96.1
94.1
90.0
92.0
107
98.3
101
99.5
93.9
92.6
89.7
82.8
81.8
92.7
88.1
89.7
94.0
82.2
82.9
73.2
85.3
89.0
86.4
84.1
88.7
85.8
85.9
83.5
105
88.4
81.1
72.9
102
104
99.8
100
114
101
96.4
87.1
85.9
86.9
85.2
87.9
7.91
9.90
9.85
9.49
14.2
14.6
15.0
16.5
13.8
18.0
12.0
10.0
13.9
10.3
15.6
8.39
20.5
20.0
6.76
7.18
19.0
10.8
13.2
6.51
9.09
14.4
10.5
5.52
11.2
9.65
12.4
1.26
14.3
13.0
7.02
10.3
19.2
14.9
15.4
7.79
10.2
17.1
15.4
9.36
86.5
96.6
101
101
93.8
102
95.8
96.9
85.0
96.6
96.7
110
105
96.7
99.4
104
114
104
105
97.9
101
100
106
105
119
101
92.7
99.2
109
96.6
97.8
98.1
80
103
94.4
103
121
106
94.3
97.2
117
97.9
109
102
10.3
1.45
2.31
2.49
13.3
6.10
9.52
5.26
9.31
8.73
11.2
14.1
8.66
4.56
6.42
3.28
13.1
9.67
3.71
6.01
7.81
4.13
14.2
7.61
15.8
14.7
15.0
11.9
11.3
1.45
4.96
3.90
7.43
10.0
7.62
4.87
11.4
13.7
12.3
8.66
15.7
9.61
12.5
9.98
the volumes of formic acid (5, 10, and 20 L) and the precipitation
reagents (methanol and acetonitrile) were optimized. Finally, the
highest extraction recoveries of all analytes were obtained when
10 L formic acid (v/v) and 400 L acetonitrile were employed for
the sample pre-preparation.
3.3. Method validation
3.3.1. Specicity
Under the optimized LCMS/MS conditions, the specicity was
evaluated by analyzing six blank plasma samples, blank plasma
added to 11 analytes and 2 ISs, and the obtained plasma after oral
administration of JJT tablet The results demonstrated that there
were no interfering peaks in the peaks region of analytes (Fig. 2).
3.3.2. Linearity and LLOQ
The calibration curves were constructed with a series of diluted
concentrations in blank plasma by plotting the peak area ratio of
the analytes to IS against the concentration of each analyte. The
results are illustrated in Table 2. The results demonstrated that calibration curves showed good linearity in the linear range of the
analytes with the correlation coefcient r more than 0.99. The LLOQ
samples of six rat plasma samples independent of the calibration
curves were determined. The results are listed in Table 3. It was
observed that the LLOQs of seven alkaloids were less than 2 ng mL1
and that of four phenolic acids were less than 20 ng mL1 .Their
RSDs of inter-day and intra-day were less than 15% and the
accuracies ranged from 80% to 118%, respectively. These results
demonstrated that the limits were sufcient enough for the pharmacokinetic study of 11 analytes after oral administration of JJT
tablet.
3.3.3. Precision and accuracy
The intra-day and inter-day precision and accuracy were calculated by preparing and analyzing six replicates of the analytes at
spiked QC samples at LLOQ low, medium and high concentration
levels on the same day and continuously for 3 days, respectively.
The results are shown in Table 3. The RSD and accuracy at three levels QC samples was less than 15% and more than 93.6.The RSD at
LLOQ was less than 20% with accuracies in the range of 80118%. It
was concluded that the precision and accuracy of the method were
acceptable.
Y.-x. Chang et al. / Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis 117 (2016) 110
Table 6
The cross-talk of each compounds(n = 6).
Compounds
Concentration
(ng mL-1)
Accuracy(%)
RSD(%)
Neochlorogenic acid
Chlorogenic acid
Cryptochlorogenic acid
Ferulic acid
Magnoorine
Coptisine
Epiberberin
Jatrorrhizin
Berberine
Palmatine
Berberubine
6000
120
6000
1200
600
60
24
48
12
12
24
100
98.7
97.2
94.3
90.1
103
111
98.7
96.5
102
111
2.64
7.54
4.24
5.74
4.40
4.42
3.13
5.26
5.48
3.24
3.14
In the study, the selection of the internal standard was investigated. Usually, the internal standard should have similar chemical
structures and physicochemical property and should not interfere
with the analytes. Based on this, two types of chemical components, tetrahydropalmatine (IS1) and rosmarinic acid (IS2) were
selected for the alkaloids and phenolic acids, respectively. The
results showed that the internal standards had no interference with
the endogenous matrix and suitable retention time for separation
was obtained for the analytes. As a result, the tetrahydropalmatine
(IS1) and rosmarinic acid (IS2) were chosen to evaluate the concentration of alkaloids and phenolic acids respectively in rat plasma
after orally administrated the JJT tablet.
3.3.5. Stability
The freezethaw stability, auto-sampler for 24 h stability and
long-term stability were evaluated by the mean concentrations of
the analytes of the QC samples at four levels. The results are listed
in Table 5, indicating that all the analytes were stable in rat plasma
for three freeze/thaw cycles, auto-sampler for 24 h at room temperature. The long term stability for 1 month was relatively stable
for all the target analytes with the accuracy for all the compounds
analysed passing FDA approved range.
3.3.6. Cross-talk validation
The accuracy of each compound is shown in Table 6. There
were two types of isomers including neochlorogenic acid, chlorogenic acid, and cryptochlorogenic acid isomer and berberine and
epiberberine isomer. The extracted ion pair results was obtained
simultaneously with others, however, it could not be infulenced
owing to retention time. For examples, the retention time of
neochlorogenic acid, chlorogenic acid and cryptochlorogenic acid
were different, and the three peaks were separated well. The Q3
of jatrorrhizin was the same with the Q1 of the berberubine. There
are two peaks which were separated well (rententian times were
24.76 min and 25.12 min) in the chromatographic gures when the
ion pair of berberubine in the mix compound was extracted. When
integrated, the area of berberubine, the peak with retention time
25.12 min was calculated. The results showed that jatrorrhizin did
not inuence the accuracy of berberubine. Based on above results, it
was concluded that there was no cross-talk inuence in the newly
established LCMS/MS methods.
Table 7
Pharmacokinetic parameters of the nine components in JinqiJiangtang tablet (n = 7, mean SD).
Compounds
Dose
(mg kg1 )
Chlorogenic acid
Ferulic acid
Magnoorine
Coptisine
Epiberberine
Jatrorrhizin
Berberine
Palmatine
Berberubine
36.0
0.25
0.29
10.9
7.22
11.4
27.3
4.57
0.13
Tmax (h)
0.70
1.80
0.64
0.42
1.83
0.39
0.30
0.46
0.82
0.19
0.41
0.20
0.69
2.85
0.54
0.20
0.50
0.40
55.2
34.3
0.69
2.39
2.01
1.54
3.62
12.6
0.45
AUC0-24
(ng mL1 h1 )
521
46.2
53.4
126
48.2
22.9
80.7
37.9
9.02
155
21.7
8.60
19.6
16.0
6.24
9.89
9.38
1.57
AUC0-
(ng mL1 h1 )
616
83.1
84.1
199
151
80.0
92.9
56.2
49.5
97.8
44.2
26.4
68.7
103
19.1
16.7
23.2
90.3
MRT0 24 (h)
T1/2 ka (h)
0.18
0.05
0.0763
0.0059
0.0097
0.0097
0.0186
0.10
0.15
5.08
2.90
8.18
8.16
10.5
8.68
7.35
7.73
9.40
0.89
1.10
0.64
1.00
2.07
2.04
1.19
0.57
0.67
T1/2 (h)
0.24
0.02
0.0758
0.0017
0.0048
0.0059
0.0105
0.15
0.11
4.41
4.42
2.67
12.4
8.17
3.97
4.41
0.28
4.44
2.56
4.90
0.97
4.52
9.82
4.22
1.78
0.40
2.77
Y.-x. Chang et al. / Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis 117 (2016) 110
Fig. 3. Mean plasma concentrationtime proles in rats after oral administration of traditional Chinese medicinal preparation Jinqi Jiangtang.
netics [23]. The results also indicated that the absorption of the
seven alkaloids and two phenolic acids might be rapid with the
Tmax values within 2 h.
However, the Cmax of seven alkaloids was less than 20 ng mL1 .
The AUC024 h values were 80.7 9.89 ng mL1 h1 for berberine, 126 19.6 ng mL1 h1 for coptisine, 48.2 16.0 ng mL1 h1
for epiberberine, 37.9 9.38 ng mL1 h1 for palmatine and
22.9 6.24 ng mL1 h1 for jatrorrhizine. These showed that these
alkaloids shared low plasma concentration. Previous studies concluded that the poor absorption and extensive metabolism might
result in low plasma concentration of berberine after oral administration [23]. Because of their similar structures with berberine and
lower contents for administration, the plasma concentration of the
other four protoberberine-type alkaloids was lower. The values of
T1/2 were in the range of 0.2812.4 h, which were greatly different
from previous study [23]. This was probably due to the different
proportions of the components in JJT tablet and the individual differences in rats.
As we can see from Fig 3, the mean plasma concentrationtime
curve proles of magnoorine and berberubine was remarkably
different from the above alkaloids. They only have a typical singlepeak in the concentrationtime curve. The Tmax value exceeded
epiberberine and jatrorrhizine and the AUC0 24 h value was higher
than epiberberine, jatrorrhizine and palmatine, though the content
of magnoorine was much lower than them. However, the Tmax and
T1/2 values were similar to them. The results might be presumably
due to the different physicochemical properties of compounds or
the PK interaction of the prescribed chemical constituents. The Tmax
and AUC0 24 h values of berberubine were low for its low concentration in JJT tablet. It is the rst time that pharmacokinetic study
of berberubine after oral administration has been reported.
It was found that values of Tmax and T1/2 of chlorogenic acid
and ferulic acid were much closer, demonstrating that they have
similar absorption and elimination rate. The Cmax values were
161 55.2 and 40.1 34.3 ng mL1 and values of AUC0 24 h were
521 155 and 46.2 21.7 ng mL1 h1 respectively. The results
were not correspondent with their dosages administered to the
rats (6.0 mg kg1 chlorogenic acid and 0.25 mg kg1 ferulic acid).
The possible reason may be that some of the ferulic acid detected
in rat plasma was the metabolites of the components in JJT tablet.
3.6. Method comparison with existing reports
There are several studies on evaluating the alkaloids in Rhizome Coptidis and its preparations [912]. In general, it is essential
to simultaneously determine different kinds of components from
TCMs and preparations in biological samples in clinical practice. But
no analytical methods for simultaneous determination of chlorogenic acid, cryptochlorogenic acid, neochlorogenic acid, ferulic
acid, magnoorine, coptisine, epiberberine, jatrorrhizin, berberine,
berberubine and palmatine in biological samples were available
in these studies. These studies mainly focused on the pharmacokinetics of alkaloids with high contents. There was a report on
the simultaneous determination of wogonin, coptisine, berberine, palmatine, jatrorrhizine, phellodendrine, magnoorine and
wogonoside from Huanglian Jiedu Decoction in rat plasma [24].
It was the rst study on the pharmacokinetics of magnoorine
(low content). However, the LLOQs for coptisine, berberine, jatrorrhizine, magnoorine and palmatine were 0.20, 0.48, 0.10, 0.32,
and 0.30 ng mL1 , respectively. The berberubine was not detected
in plasma. In our study, the LLOQs were 0.04 ng mL1 for berberine
and palmatine, 0.16 ng mL1 for jatrorrhizine, 0.2 ng mL1 for coptisine, 2 ng mL1 for magnoorine. Though the LLOQ of magnoorine
was a little higher than the above study, the method described in
our study is more suitable for clinical applications. To the best of our
knowledge, this is the rst time chlorogenic acid, cryptochlorogenic
acid, neochlorogenic acid, ferulic acid, magnoorine, coptisine,
epiberberine, jatrorrhizin, berberine, berberubine and palmatine
has been simultaneously determined using an LCMSMS method.
4. Conclusion
For the rst time, a rapid, sensitive, and convenient LCESIMS/MS method for the simultaneous determination of four
phenolic acids (neochlorogenic acid, chlorogenic acid, cryptochlorogenic acid and ferulic acid) and seven alkaloids (berberine,
10
Y.-x. Chang et al. / Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis 117 (2016) 110