Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Rendah
Count
Tinggi
16
21
37
25.5
37.0
43.2%
56.8%
100.0%
19
21
6.5
14.5
21.0
9.5%
90.5%
100.0%
18
40
58
18.0
40.0
58.0
31.0%
69.0%
100.0%
Count
Expected Count
% within Motivasi kerja
Total
Count
Expected Count
% within Motivasi kerja
Total
11.5
Expected Count
% within Motivasi kerja
Disiplin
Chi-Square Tests
Value
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correction
Likelihood Ratio
df
7.117a
.008
5.628
.018
8.024
.005
.009
Linear-by-Linear Association
N of Valid Cases
6.994
.008
58
a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 6.52.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Risk Estimate
95% Confidence Interval
Value
Odds Ratio for Motivasi kerja
(Rendah / Tinggi)
For cohort Disiplin kerja
perawat = Kurang disiplin
For cohort Disiplin kerja
perawat = Disiplin
N of Valid Cases
Lower
Upper
7.238
1.468
35.693
4.541
1.155
17.850
.627
.458
.858
58
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
.007
Kurang baik
Count
Baik
14
4.3
9.7
14.0
64.3%
35.7%
100.0%
35
44
13.7
30.3
44.0
20.5%
79.5%
100.0%
18
40
58
18.0
40.0
58.0
31.0%
69.0%
100.0%
Count
Expected Count
% within Ketegasan
pimpinan
Total
Count
Expected Count
% within Ketegasan
pimpinan
Total
Expected Count
% within Ketegasan
pimpinan
Disiplin
Chi-Square Tests
Value
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correction
Likelihood Ratio
df
9.533a
.002
7.595
.006
9.014
.003
.006
Linear-by-Linear Association
N of Valid Cases
9.369
.002
58
a. 1 cells (25.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 4.34.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Risk Estimate
95% Confidence Interval
Value
Odds Ratio for Ketegasan
pimpinan (Kurang baik /
Baik)
For cohort Disiplin kerja
perawat = Kurang disiplin
For cohort Disiplin kerja
perawat = Disiplin
N of Valid Cases
Lower
Upper
7.000
1.878
26.098
3.143
1.559
6.338
.449
.219
.921
58
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
.004
Kurang baik
13
11
24
Expected Count
7.4
16.6
24.0
54.2%
45.8%
100.0%
Count
Expected Count
% within Sanksi hukuman
Total
Total
Count
% within Sanksi hukuman
Baik
Disiplin
Count
Expected Count
% within Sanksi hukuman
29
34
10.6
23.4
34.0
14.7%
85.3%
100.0%
18
40
58
18.0
40.0
58.0
31.0%
69.0%
100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correction
Likelihood Ratio
df
10.236a
.001
8.475
.004
10.348
.001
.003
Linear-by-Linear Association
N of Valid Cases
10.059
.002
58
a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 7.45.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Risk Estimate
95% Confidence Interval
Value
Odds Ratio for Sanksi
hukuman (Kurang baik /
Baik)
For cohort Disiplin kerja
perawat = Kurang disiplin
For cohort Disiplin kerja
perawat = Disiplin
N of Valid Cases
Lower
Upper
6.855
1.977
23.762
3.683
1.514
8.963
.537
.340
.848
58
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
.002
Count
Expected Count
% within Pendidikan dan
pelatihan
Count
Expected Count
% within Pendidikan dan
pelatihan
Total
Count
Expected Count
% within Pendidikan dan
pelatihan
Disiplin
Total
15
20
35
10.9
24.1
35.0
42.9%
57.1% 100.0%
20
23
7.1
15.9
23.0
13.0%
87.0% 100.0%
18
40
58
18.0
40.0
58.0
31.0%
69.0% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correction
Likelihood Ratio
df
5.764a
.016
4.455
.035
6.232
.013
.021
Linear-by-Linear Association
5.665
N of Valid Casesb
.017
58
a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 7.14.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Risk Estimate
95% Confidence Interval
Value
Odds Ratio for Pendidikan
dan pelatihan (Tidak pernah
mengikuti DIKLAT / Pernah
mengikuti DIKLAT)
For cohort Disiplin kerja
perawat = Kurang disiplin
For cohort Disiplin kerja
perawat = Disiplin
N of Valid Cases
Lower
Upper
5.000
1.250
19.992
3.286
1.069
10.095
.657
.474
.912
58
.015
MULTIVARIAT
Regresi I
Variables in the Equation
B
Step 1a
S.E.
Wald
df
Sig.
Exp(B)
Ketegasan
2.078
.934
4.953
.026
7.991
Pendidik
2.433
.987
6.077
.014
11.391
.629
1.041
.365
.546
1.875
2.167
.860
6.341
.012
8.730
-2.583
.949
7.411
.006
.076
Motiv
Sanksi
Constant
Regresi II
Variables not in the Equation
Score
Step 0
Variables
df
Sig.
Ketegasan
9.533
.002
Pendidik
5.764
.016
10.236
.001
21.522
.000
Sanksi
Overall Statistics
S.E.
Wald
df
Sig.
Exp(B)
Ketegasan
2.334
.859
7.386
.007
10.316
Pendidik
2.490
1.002
6.169
.013
12.056
Sanksi
2.352
.817
8.292
.004
10.510
-2.703
.946
8.167
.004
.067
Constant
UJI INTERAKSI
Variables in the Equation
B
Step 1a
S.E.
Wald
df
Sig.
Exp(B)
Ketegasan
2.286
1.319
3.001
.083
9.832
Pendidik
2.540
1.126
5.091
.024
12.680
.687
1.062
.418
.518
1.988
Sanksi
2.452
1.518
2.607
.106
11.607
Ketegasan by Sanksi
-.418
1.805
.054
.817
.659
-2.776
1.294
4.601
.032
.062
Motiv
Constant
S.E.
Wald
df
Sig.
Exp(B)
Ketegasan
2.082
.954
4.759
.029
8.022
Pendidik
2.437
1.006
5.867
.015
11.434
.649
1.463
.197
.657
1.914
Sanksi
2.177
.995
4.790
.029
8.817
Motiv by Sanksi
-.039
1.957
.000
.984
.961
-2.590
1.007
6.613
.010
.075
Motiv
Constant
S.E.
Wald
df
Sig.
Exp(B)
Ketegasan
2.581
1.118
5.329
.021
13.208
Pendidik
3.608
1.304
7.652
.006
36.877
Motiv
1.467
1.296
1.280
.258
4.336
Sanksi
2.585
.966
7.157
.007
13.268
Motiv by Pendidik
-4.258
2.161
3.883
.549
.014
Constant
-3.317
1.147
8.358
.004
.036