Professional Documents
Culture Documents
440
Introduction
The global economic crisis in 2007/08, which included
food, fuel, and financial crises, resulted in higher
global food prices. Between 2000 and 2008, the Food
and Agriculture Organization (FAO) food price index
more than doubled, while the cereal price index more
than tripled [1]. Food prices also increased in Indonesia [2]. Higher food prices increased household
food expenditures while worsening the quantity and
quality of food consumed, potentially leading to child
undernutrition [3, 4].
Undernutrition is more likely to occur in the first 2
years of life and can have irreversible consequences,
such as growth failure and damage to brain and organ
development [5]. These consequences can be related to
numerous outcomes during adulthood, including short
stature, lower income, lower economic productivity,
poor intellectual ability, poor reproductive performance, high glucose concentrations, high blood pressure, and metabolic and cardiovascular diseases [6, 7].
Therefore, the first 2 years of life is a critical window of
opportunity for intervention to prevent undernutrition
and to support optimal growth and development [8, 9].
Previous studies conducted in several countries
found that higher proportions of expenditures on
nonstaple foods are associated with a lower risk of
undernutrition [1012]. A recent study in Bangladesh
using Nutrition Surveillance Project data from 2000 to
2005 showed that expenditure on rice was positively
Food and Nutrition Bulletin, vol. 35, no. 4 2014, The Nevin Scrimshaw International Nutrition Foundation.
441
Methods
Data sources
Data were collected from two nationally representative surveys: the National Socioeconomic Survey
(Susenas) and the National Basic Health Research
(Riskesdas). Both surveys were conducted in 2007 by
Statistics Indonesia and the National Institute of Health
Research and Development of Ministry of Health,
respectively. Susenas was a household survey that collected socioeconomic data from a district representative sample with a national scope, using a multistage
cluster sampling design [1719]. Clustering occurred
within census blocks that are a part of a village, having
a clear natural or created (subhamlet, hamlet, etc.)
boundary, and are located in one region. The number
of census blocks per district was proportional to the
number of households in each district (probability
proportional to size). If the number of households in a
census block was more than 150, a subcensus block was
created. Afterwards, 16 households were selected by
simple random sampling from all households in each
census block. The survey collected data on education,
demographics, housing and environment, social and
cultural activities, household expenditures, domestic
travel, and community perception of their own welfare.
The variables were classified into two categories: core,
containing general characteristics of the households,
and module, which contains data on expenditures.
The module collected data on food expenditures (215
items) and nonfood expenditures (104 items). The time
frame of expenditure on food was 1 week prior to the
interview. Data were collected in February and March
2007 by interviews using structured questionnaires
with the mother or other household members who
had knowledge of the household conditions. The total
numbers of households in the core and the module of
Susenas 2007 were 274,184 and 64,880, respectively.
The study used data from 14,767 households in the
module with children less than 2 years of age from 437
districts in 33 provinces [19].
Riskesdas was also a national survey with a district
representative sample employing a sampling design
similar to that of Susenas [20]. Riskesdas collected data
on health and nutrition, such as anthropometry, mortality, morbidity, and food consumption, by interviews
using structured questionnaires. Data were collected
in two stages, from July 2007 to January 2008 for 28
442
A. V. R. Mauludyani et al.
Strategic foods
443
Statistical analysis
Results
Household expenditure in the 437 districts ranged
between 170,000 IDR/person/month (US$18) and
332,000 IDR/person/month (US$35). Based on the
IDR to US$ conversion rate for the year 2007, the
mean household expenditure was 230,125 IDR/person/
month (US$24). Among all strategic foods, the mean
proportion of household expenditure on rice was the
highest (22.6%), followed by animal protein (12.7%).
The mean proportion of mothers with low education
was 46.9%. Nutrient intake among children under 2
years old was poor. The mean proportions of children
with inadequate intakes of energy, protein, iron, and
zinc were 33.3%, 11.1%, 81.8%, and 55.6%, respectively. The prevalence of high stunting, high wasting,
and high underweight were 46.9%, 59.5%, and 17.2%,
respectively (table 1).
A lower mean proportion of household expenditures
on animal protein was significantly associated with
lower odds (3rd vs. 1st tertile) of a high prevalence of
stunting compared with the districts in the lowest tertile (OR, 2.08; 95% CI, 1.13 to 3.82; p = .019) (table 2).
A higher mean proportion of household expenditures
Value
170,000 (18)
231,000 (24)
332,000 (35)
22.6
3.7
0.1
1.5
1.7
12.7
5.53
33.3
11.1
81.8
55.6
46.9
46.9
59.5
17.2
444
A. V. R. Mauludyani et al.
Discussion
This study aimed to characterize the relationship of
mean proportion of household expenditure on strategic foods with the prevalence of undernutrition. The
study found that a lower mean proportion of household
expenditure on soybeans and higher mean proportions
of household expenditures on animal protein, manufactured complementary food, and sugar and cooking
oil were associated with undernutrition.
A higher proportion of household expenditure on
soybeans was associated with lower odds of prevalence
of high wasting and underweight. Protein is the primary nutrient in the body, with a role in tissue repair
and growth. Proteins also serve as hormones and other
components critical to child development [31]. Therefore, the protein content of soybeans may be associated
with reductions in wasting and underweight of children. The phytic acid contained in soybeans reduces
iron and zinc absorption [32]. However, the types
of soybean reported in this study are mostly tempeh
(soybean cake) and soybean paste, which are fermented
products. Fermentation is the best way to reduce phytic
acid, and therefore this process minimizes the reduction in iron and zinc absorption [33].
A lower mean proportion of household expenditure
on manufactured complementary food was associated with lower odds of a high prevalence of wasting.
Manufactured complementary food is one of the best
solutions to deficient nutrient intake among children,
since conventional complementary food is lacking
in key nutrients, particularly iron and zinc, so that
it is unlikely to meet the nutrient requirements for
children [34]. Manufactured complementary food is
fortified with micronutrients to meet the nutritional
requirements of children, especially those aged 6 to
24 months [35]. Iron and zinc are critical for growth
OR
95% CI
Rice
1
2
3
1.00
1.02
1.81
1.00
0.571.84
0.913.58
.939
.089
Nonrice staplesb
1
2
3
1.00
1.43
1.25
1.00
0.852.42
0.712.20
.179
.440
1.00
1.00
2
3
0.90
0.66
0.511.58
0.381.16
.711
.152
Formula milk
1
2
3
1.00
0.74
1.10
1.00
0.451.22
0.602.04
.240
.759
Soybeans
1
2
3
1.00
1.14
0.86
1.00
0.671.95
0.471.56
.631
.615
Animal proteinc
1
2
3
1.00
1.63
2.08
1.00
0.942.81
1.133.82
.080
.019*
1
2
3
1.00
1.37
1.32
1.00
0.812.31
0.742.34
.241
.348
Food
a. Stunting is defined as length/height-for-age z-score (HAZ) < 2. High stunting prevalence is defined as 30%. The multivariate model is adjusted for household income and
proportion of mothers with low education.
b. Nonrice staples consist of corn, cassava, sweet potatoes, and wheat flour.
c. Animal protein consists of beef, egg, chicken, and fish.
*Logistic regression, p < .05.
445
OR
95% CI
Rice
1
2
3
1.00
0.77
0.75
1.00
0.451.32
0.411.38
.346
.358
Nonrice staplesb
1
2
3
1.00
0.63
0.89
1.00
0.381.05
0.511.54
.076
.672
1.00
1.00
2
3
1.76
1.90
0.983.17
1.063.41
.060
.032*
Formula milk
1
2
3
1.00
0.78
0.61
1.00
0.471.32
0.321.14
.358
.118
Soybeans
1
2
3
1.00
0.88
0.51
1.00
0.501.52
0.280.94
.634
.031*
Animal proteinc
1
2
3
1.00
1.32
1.24
1.00
0.782.24
0.682.25
.309
.485
1
2
3
1.00
1.70
2.41
1.00
1.022.85
1.374.23
.042*
.002*
Food
446
A. V. R. Mauludyani et al.
study also found that the mean proportion of household expenditure on sugar and cooking oil was negatively correlated with mean household income and
proportion of expenditure on manufactured complementary foods, formula milk, and soybeans. Manufactured complementary foods, formula milk, and
soybeans are nutrient-dense foods, while sugar and
cooking oil are energy-dense foods with less nutritional
value [35, 40, 41]. Fried food is widely preferred by
Indonesians, especially by poor people. It is cheap and
can be purchased in many places, including from street
vendors [42]. The poor nutritional value of sugar and
cooking oil is associated with undernutrition.
A lower mean proportion of household expenditure
on animal protein was significantly associated with
lower odds of a high prevalence of stunting. This
finding is not in line with the previous study [11].
Animal-source foods are good sources of bioavailable,
high-quality protein and important micronutrients
needed for growth because they are rich in micronutrients such as iron, zinc, vitamin A, and iodine [43]. Our
study also tried to relate expenditure on animal protein
OR
95% CI
Rice
1
2
3
1.00
1.28
0.91
1.00
0.602.72
0.421.96
.519
.801
Nonrice staplesb
1
2
3
1.00
1.02
0.64
1.00
0.482.17
0.301.41
.967
.269
1.00
1.00
2
3
0.90
0.76
0.411.96
0.361.62
.780
.481
Formula milk
1
2
3
1.00
1.05
0.93
1.00
0.542.02
0.372.35
.887
.882
Soybeans
1
2
3
1.00
0.47
0.09
1.00
0.240.93
0.030.28
.030*
< .0001*
Animal proteinc
1
2
3
1.00
0.92
1.40
1.00
0.412.06
0.623.15
.829
.422
1
2
3
1.00
2.38
2.23
1.00
1.055.41
0.965.20
.039*
.063
Food
447
Anna Vipta Resti Mauludyani received a scholarship to attend a course and workshop at the Harvard
School of Public Health entitled Analysis of Health
and Nutrition Data from Low-Income Countries and
also received support for manuscript preparation and
data analysis from the Higher Education Network
Ring Initiative (HENRI) Program, a partnership supported by a grant from the US Agency for International
Development-Indonesia (Cooperative Agreement
AID-497-A-11-00002) to the Harvard School of Public
Health in partnership with, and with in-kind contributions from, the SEAMEO Regional Centre for Food
and Nutrition, the University of Mataram, Andalas
University, the Summit Institute of Development, and
Helen Keller International, with additional contributions from the Rajawali Foundation and the Harvard
Kennedy School Indonesia Program. The funding
sources had no involvement in the study design, writing of the report, or in the decision to submit the paper
for publication.
Acknowledgments
Anna Vipta Resti Mauludyani received Susenas and
Riskesdas data from the Indonesian Center for Agriculture Socio Economic and Policy Studies of Ministry of
Agriculture and National Institute of Health Research
and Development of Ministry of Health, respectively.
References
1. Food and Agriculture Organization. FAOs food price
indices. Crop Prospects and Food Situation 2008:123.
2. World Food Programme. Pilot monitoring of high food
price impact at household level in selected vulnerable
areas. Available at: http://documents.wfp.org/stellent/
groups/public/documents/ena/wfp199568.pdf. Accessed
25 September 2014.
3. Brinkman HJ, de Pee S, Sanogo I, Subran L, Bloem
MW. High food prices and the global financial crisis
have reduced access to nutritious food and worsened
nutritional status and health. J Nutr 2010;140:153S61S.
4. Darnton-Hill I, Cogill B. Maternal and young child
nutrition adversely affected by external shocks such as
increasing global food prices. J Nutr 2010;140:162S9S.
5. United Nations Childrens Fund. Tracking progress on
child and maternal nutrition: a survival and development priority. New York: UNICEF, 2009.
6. Black RE, Allen LH, Bhutta ZA, Caulfield LE, de Onis
M, Ezzati M, Mathers C, Rivera J. Maternal and child
undernutrition: global and regional exposures and
health consequences. Lancet 2008;371:24360.
7. Victora CG, Adair L, Fall C, Hallal PC, Martorell R,
Richter L, Sachdev HS. Maternal and child undernutrition: consequences for adult health and human capital.
Lancet 2008;371:34057.
8. Barker DJ, Bergmann RL, Ogra PL. Concluding
remarks. The window of opportunity: pre-pregnancy
to 24 months of age. Nestle Nutr Workshop Ser Pediatr
Program 2008;61:25560.
9. Barker DJP. Introduction: the window of opportunity. J
Nutr 2007;137:10589.
10. Campbell AA, de Pee S, Sun K, Kraemer K, ThorneLyman A, Moench-Pfanner R, Sari M, Akhter N, Bloem
MW, Semba RD. Household rice expenditure and
maternal and child nutritional status in Bangladesh. J
Nutr 2010;140:189S94S.
448
Community Health 2000;54:3817.
22. Kumar K. Indicators for measuring changes in income,
food availability and consumption, and the natural
resource base. US Agency for International Development, 1989. Available at: http://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/
PNAAX223.PDF. Accessed 10 Nov. 2014.
23. Ministry of Agriculture. Pedoman teknis pemantauan
pasar (Technical guidance for market monitoring).
Jakarta: Director General of Marketing and Processing
of Agricultural Product, Ministry of Agriculture, 2012.
24. Dewey KG, Brown KH. Update on technical issues
concerning complementary feeding of young children in
developing countries and implications for intervention
programs. Food Nutr Bull 2003;24:528.
25. World Health Organization. Complementary feeding
of young children in developing countries: a review of
current scientific knowledge. Geneva: WHO, 1998.
26. Gibson RS. Principles of nutritional assessment, 2nd ed.
New York: Oxford University Press, 2005.
27. World Health Organization. WHO Child Growth Standards: Methods and development. Geneva: WHO, 2006.
28. de Onis M, Onyango A, Borghi E, Siyam A, Blossner M,
Lutter C. Worldwide implementation of the WHO Child
Growth Standards. Public Health Nutr 2012;15:60310.
29. Mei Z, Grummer-Strawn LM. Standard deviation
of anthropometric Z-scores as a data quality assessment tool using the 2006 WHO growth standards:
a cross country analysis. Bull World Health Organ
2007;85:4418.
30. World Health Organization. WHO global database on
child health and nutrition. Geneva: WHO, 1997.
31. US Department of Agriculture. Report of the dietary
guidelines advisory committee on the dietary guidelines
for Americans. Washington, DC: USDA, 2010.
32. Gibson RS, Bailey KB, Gibbs M, Ferguson EL. A review
of phytate, iron, zinc, and calcium concentrations in
plant-based complementary foods used in low-income
countries and implications for bioavailability. Food Nutr
Bull 2010;31(suppl):S13446.
33. Hurrell RF. Influence of vegetable protein sources
A. V. R. Mauludyani et al.
34.
35.
36.
37.
38.
39.
40.
41.
42.
43.
44.