Professional Documents
Culture Documents
115
Decreasing
pore size
Increasing
pore size
Relative activity
120
100
90
80
115
100
90
80
70
Relative activity
130
60
70
50
60
Decreasing access to active sites
www.digitalrefining.com/article/1001064
Catalysis 2015 1
170
Relative activity
160
150
140
130
120
110
100
90
130
125
586DX
AT575
120
115
110
105
100
95
90
HDS
HDN
190
180
170
160
150
140
130
120
110
100
90
80
70
HDS
HDN
AT775
AT792
AT795
486DX
2 Catalysis 2015
www.digitalrefining.com/article/1001064
Activity advantage, F
CoMo
catalyst
that
has
190
outstanding
HDS
activity
HDS
180
coupled with high HDN activity.
HDN
170
Figure 4 shows a comparison of
160
the activity of several genera150
tions of ART HDS catalysts for
140
FCC pretreat along with 486DX.
130
The results from side-by-side
120
testing clearly show that 486DX
110
exhibits a significant improve100
ment in performance over the
90
prior generation. There has
80
been continuous improvement
70
AT775
AT792
AT795
486DX
in activity with each generation
since the introduction of ApART
in 2004. Most recently, 486DX Figure 5 486DX performance in low pressure FCC pretreat
has been shown to have a 20%
HDS advantage as well as a 10%
25
improvement for HDN over
HDS
AT795.
HDN
20
In lower pressure applications, 486DX continues to
maintain its advantage over
15
previous generations, including
AT795 (see Figure 5). Figures 4
10
and 5 demonstrate the robustness of 486DX performance and
5
indicate that it is an effective
catalyst over a wide range of
conditions.
0
AT575 / AT795
586DX / 486DX
Both the hydrotreating catalyst system and the operating
strategy for the pretreater are Figure 6 Comparison of AT575/AT795 and 586DX/486DX ApART catalyst systems
critical to providing the highest
quality feed for the FCC. Driving the hydro- ics involved in FCC pretreating and, through its
treater to remove nitrogen and PNAs improves relationship with Grace Refining Technologies, a
FCC product value when targeting gasoline detailed understanding of the effects of hydroproduction, but this needs to be balanced against treating on FCC unit performance.
The appropriate choice of an FCC pretreat
the increased costs of higher hydrogen consumption and shorter cycle length that result from catalyst system must, in addition to other potenthis mode of operation. To address this need, tially important considerations such as feed
ART utilises the ApART catalyst system for FCC metals removal, represent an optimisation of
pretreatment. This technology is designed to sulphur removal capability as well as HDN and
provide increases in HDS conversion while at saturation activity. The flexibility of the ApART
the same time providing significant upgrading of system offers the potential to provide maximum
FCC feedstock quality and increasing yields. In HDS activity, and thus lowest FCC gasoline
essence, an ApART catalyst system is a staged sulphur content, while also providing a maxibed of high activity NiMo and CoMo catalysts mum in FCC unit conversion at constant coke
where the relative quantities of each catalyst can operation.
The addition of 586DX and 486DX to the
be optimised to meet each refiners goals and
constraints. ART has continued to develop a ApART system portfolio enhances the flexibility
better understanding of the reactions and kinet- and performance of these systems for FCC
www.digitalrefining.com/article/1001064
Catalysis 2015 3
pretreat. They expand the capability to significantly reduce required SOR temperatures for
both HDS and HDN. The optimised system of
586DX/486DX offers refiners an enhanced ability to generate lower sulphur FCC products as
well as still delivering the benefits of nitrogen
removal and polyaromatic saturation. Figure 6
shows a comparison of an AT575/AT795 system
with the new 586DX/486DX system. There is a
clear and significant improvement in both HDS
and HDN activity with the ApART system.
The additional HDS activity combined with
maximum nitrogen removal and aromatic saturation allows refiners to utilise 586DX as a
standalone catalyst for maximum upgrade in
refinery markets demanding increased yields.
Refiners can also choose to utilise 486DX as a
standalone catalyst in order to minimise hydrogen consumption while still achieving excellent
sulphur removal for meeting Tier III sulphur
regulations. Combining these two catalysts in an
ApART catalyst system is ideal for hydrotreaters
that need to operate with controlled or minimised hydrogen consumption yet still require low
sulphur while maintaining yield gains in their
FCC. These units are able to benefit from a lower
start of run temperature as well as being able to
gain some additional improvements that are not
often achieved in a system of 100% NiMo or
CoMo.
Conclusion
Advanced Refining Technologies (ART) first
introduced the catalyst system for FCC feed
4 Catalysis 2015
Links
More articles from: Grace Catalysts Technologies/ART
More articles from the following categories:
Catalysts & Additives
Fluid Catalytic Cracking
www.digitalrefining.com/article/1001064