Professional Documents
Culture Documents
8 2 - s | M A R C H 1982
Introduction
The control of impurities and alloying
elements in steels has been facilitated by
the recent progress of steel refining techniques. This has led to intense activity in
research and development of stainless
steels. Austenitic stainless steels play an
important role as structural materials in
nuclear reactor and general chemical
plant applications. To enhance the quality
of such structural materials, this progress
of steel refining techniques should be
accompanied by a similar advancement
in the field of welding techniques.
Hot-cracking susceptibility of austenitic
stainless steels depends upon metallurgical phenomena related to the chemical
composition, and constitutes one of the
most important factors affecting weldability. Many studies have been made in
this respect (Ref. 5,6), but they have not
succeeded in thoroughly clarifying the
mechanism of hot cracking and the
effects of chemical composition. From
the view-point of steelmaking, there are
still some difficulties in quantitatively
determining the effect of each alloy element on the hot-cracking susceptibility of
stainless steel.
A study was made of the effect of
chemical composition of austenitic stainless steels on weldability. Emphasis was
placed on quantitative measurement hotcracking resistance with a view to the
application of the results to the production of materials for actual welded structures. Hot-cracking susceptibility was
investigated by the Varestraint test
method developed by W. F. Savage and
C. D. Lundin (Ref. 1), and the effects of C,
Si, P, S, Nb, N and <5 ferrite on hot cracking
of austenitic stainless steels were investigated. Segregation of these elements at
crack surfaces was investigated by auger
electron spectroscopy (beam diameter
0.2-1.0 nm).
From these investigations, minimization
of phosphorus, sulfur and other impurities was found to lower hot-cracking
susceptibility of fully austenitic stainless
steel to the level of that of Type 304.
With Nb-stabilized austenitic stainless
steel (Type 347), which is known to have
a high hot-cracking susceptibility, strict
control of niobium, impurities and 8 ferrite proved to impart high resistance to
hot cracking.
These findings were applied to production of 25 and 40 mm (1 and 1.6 in.)
thick plates of modified Type 347 austenitic stainless steel as a new material for the
piping system in boiling water nuclear
reactors (BWR). Joints of these thick
plates welded by gas tungsten arc welding (GTAW), shielded metal arc welding
(SMAW), and submerged arc welding
(SAW) exhibited excellent hot-cracking
resistance (Ref. 8). Weldability of these
plates will be reported separately,
together with their stress-corrosioncracking resistance and mechanical properties (Ref. 21).
Results
A comprehensive study of the hotcracking susceptibility of austenitic stainless steels should include a study of fully
austenitic weld metals as well as of
duplex weld metals consisting of a mixture of austenite and ferrite. This is because of the well-known fact that 8 ferrite
has such a great effect on the hotcracking susceptibility that the effect of
chemical components cannot be determined readily when ferrite is present.
Accordingly, the effect of phosphorus,
sulfur, silicon and niobium were studied in
both fully austenitic and duplex weld
metals. *^
Effects of P, S, Si, Nb, C and N on Hot
Cracking Susceptibility of Fully Austenitic
Alloys
Phosphorus and sulfur both have great
influence on hot-cracking susceptibility.
Figure 2 shows the effect of phosphorus.
Hot-cracking
susceptibility
increases
markedly as the phosphorus content
exceeds 0.015%. Figure 3 shows the
effect of sulfur; here phosphorus content
was maintained at approximately 0.002%
to eliminate its effect. Note that the
hot-cracking susceptibility increases rapidly for sulfur content above 0.010%.
Therefore, even fully austenitic weld
metals such as 25% Cr-20% Ni (Type
310S), can be improved substantially in
hot-cracking resistance by lowering both
phosphorus and sulfur contents to
approximately 0.002%. It should be
noted that both affect the hot-cracking
susceptibility, as will be discussed later.
Figure 4 shows the results of Varestraint tests of fully austenitic stainless
steels refined by the Metal-bearing Solution Refining (MSR) process which is one
of the most advanced steel refining techniques (Ref. 12). They are compared with
the test results for a commercial steel and
a low-P, low-S steel made by the induction melting process. The MSR-treated
extra-low-P and -S steels have extremely
high hot-cracking resistance compared to
that of the commercial Type 304 as
discussed later, and the low-P, low-S air
melted steel had intermediate resistance
Table 1.Chemical Composit on (wl %) of Laboratory Heats (10kg Melt) and Commercials- - C : X 1 0 ~ \ P,S: X 1 0 ' 3
N
,5F<a>
Si
Mn
Cr
Ni
S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
S7
204
400
385
438
550
160
422
0.11
0.24
0.23
0.24
0.24
0.25
0.24
1.62
1.52
1.53
2
2
2
1,51
1.49
1.51
1.50
2
2
2
2
3
3
5
12
14
15
18
24.67
24.88
24.79
25.02
22.14
21.80
24.80
19.43
19.70
19.58
19.69
19.98
19.87
19.83
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
PI
P2
P3
P4
P5
287
272
211
200
211
0.18
0.21
1.54
1.48
0.19
0.24
0. 18
1.51
1.54
1.54
2
12
15
18
21
3
3
4
5
24.79
23.87
24.92
21.66
25.07
19.75
18.45
19.62
20.14
19.71
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Sil
Si2
Si3
Si4
Si5
Si6
Si7
Si8
Si9
Si 10
470
520
470
670
470
460
600
630
670
590
0.16
0.18
0.75
1.00
1.35
1.85
2.00
3.01
3.30
3.55
1.11
1.11
14
14
15
10
14
14
16
14
18
13
8
9
7
9
8
6
13
6
9
5
25.0
25.0
25.3
26.2
25.1
25.2
24.8
18.4
26.6
19.2
18.5
18.0
18.6
18.7
18.7
17.8
18.5
13.4
18.5
13.5
17
sin
204
180
130
234
640
1.22
Si12
Si13
Si14
Si15
1.24
1.65
2.04
0.24
1.50
1.50
2
2
3
2
2
4
2
2
3
3
23.50
22.74
22.64
22.94
25.64
20.43
21 9 8
20.93
20.54
19.80
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
304
316
316L
347
310S
STEEL-A
STEEL-B
STEEL-C
Incoloy 800
500
700
200
440
530
900
300
660
400
0.75
0.66
0.76
0.56
0.65
2.13
0.76
3.32
0.34
0.94
1.01
1.04
1.68
1.00
1.54
1.47
0.25
0.86
26
20
20
22
26
25
23
18
6
7
6
8
7
4
5
2
4
4
18.3
16.7
17.5
17.2
25.1
24.2
24.5
19.4
1.12
1.54
1.11
1.07
1.15
0.39
1.62
0.39
1.47
1.52
1.40
22.2
Nb
'TO
2.
Nil
0.3
3.0
160
M o 2.38
M o 2.33
0.72
Mo. 0.77
M o 0.78
170
2510
3500
Ti 0.50
200
f
^
0
g u00
1 -
\
-_
c
N
.. o. *
-g
=
fI
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
9.4
12.4
14.8
11.1
19.9
13.4
13.1
12.8
31.1
Note
5.0
1.0
0.2
Nil
Nil
2.0
2.0
3.0
Nil
I5
c5
i- .9P
.] i u
-i
-l
a
|
c
Table 2.Chemical Composition (wt-%) of Laboratory Heats (10kg Melt) with Variable Niobium ContentC: X10" 4 , S,P: X 10"
Mn
Cr
Ni
Nb
<5F
NB1
NB2
NB3
NB4
NB5
NB6
NB7
NB8
120
130
150
170
130
120
150
160
0.19
0.18
0.19
0.19
0.22
0.20
0.21
0.19
1.35
1.47
1.46
1.46
1.49
1.40
1.50
1.43
2
2
3
2
3
2
3
3
12
13
13
13
13
13
13
12
23.31
24.43
24.34
24.53
23.65
22.27
24.35
24.15
21.93
23.04
22.89
22.93
22.51
22.41
22.99
22.69
0.15
0.24
0.31
0.41
0.52
0.73
0.94
NB13
NB14
NB15
NB16
NB17
140
390
460
990
1280
0.17
0.19
0.19
0.18
0.17
1.51
1.51
1.49
1.47
1.47
2
3
3
3
3
14
12
13
12
12
24.41
24.01
24.13
24.13
24.38
22.86
22.66
22.68
22.79
22.95
0.26
0.25
0.27
0.27
0.27
353
416
446
393
376
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
NB18
NB19
NB20
NB21
NB22
180
330
480
880
1120
0.17
0.17
0.21
0.19
0.20
1.48
1.44
1.49
1.50
1.46
3
3
3
2
3
12
12
12
12
12
24.16
23.90
24.51
24.16
24.17
22.72
22.45
22.96
23.05
22.66
0.75
0.76
0.80
0.78
0.77
397
390
340
319
406
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
NB23
NB24
NB25
NB26
NB27
NB28
150
150
160
190
200
250
0.19
0.20
0.19
0.19
0.19
0.19
1.45
1.47
1.48
1.54
1.47
1.44
5
5
5
5
5
5
4
4
4
4
4
4
21.05
20.81
20.99
21.13
20.93
20.97
22.51
22.33
22.26
22.40
22.52
22.46
0.25
0.25
0.24
0.24
0.24
0.25
247
379
506
722
983
1320
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
7B6
7B7
7B8
7B9
54
49
58
54
0.18
0.18
0.19
0.18
1.48
1.47
1.49
1.43
5
4
4
5
3
3
2
3
18.77
18.61
18.67
18.57
9.69
9.72
9.76
9.63
0.26
0.53
0.78
1.18
237
218
221
243
4.1
4.6
4.7
4.0
Kl
K2
K3
K4
K5
K6
150
140
150
160
150
220
0.34
0.34
0.36
0.36
0.36
0.37
1.69
1.72
1.60
1.62
1.68
1.70
13
14
14
14
15
15
7
7
7
7
7
7
17.7
17.6
17.7
17.6
17.7
17.7
11.0
10.9
11.2
11.1
11.0
11.2
0.12
0.15
0.18
0.23
0.30
0.45
40
36
35
35
34
37
2.5
2.6
2.9
3.1
3.1
2.5
7B1
7B2
7B3
7B4
7B5
200
180
240
220
290
0.20
0.20
0.20
0.20
0.20
1.56
1.47
1.48
1.52
1.46
5
4
4
5
5
3
3
3
3
3
18.46
18.68
18.81
18.88
20.22
10.00
10.02
9.35
9.31
9.28
0.23
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
223
315
461
932
1330
2.7
3.0
3.2
2.3
3.4
03
2.
Note
I
Z
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
"O
'Z-z L L .
>
I
.2 2
~ S ul
>
c 5
|1
1 u
T
z
0
c ^
m uT3
4.
J
rg
5 %
_Q
Z -o r-j
_ > oo
OS*
3 +
$
i
r
5 'TJ M
4 - fc "
Ni
Nb
150
150
140
140
160
140
140
0.35
0.34
0.33
0.32
0.34
0.35
0.33
1.61
1.61
1.62
1.72
1.76
1.67
1.73
8
4
3
3
24
27
26
4
4
4
4
8
7
7
18.0
17.6
17.9
17.8
17.9
17.7
17.9
9.9
10.0
9.8
9.4
9.9
9.7
9.5
0.29
0.29
0.29
0.29
0.28
0.28
0.30
220
490
480
500
450
470
460
4.5
3.5
3.0
3.3
3.2
3.0
4.0
D_
K7
K8
K9
KK)
150
160
160
180
0.38
0.36
0.35
0.35
1.74
1.69
1.69
1.70
18
25
25
25
8
7
7
7
17.5
18.0
17.7
18.0
11.4
11.1
11.4
11.2
0.30
0.29
0.30
0.30
300
430
620
800
1.0
0.2
Nil
Nil
_0)
No.94
No.95
140
130
0.01
0.01
1.48
1.48
2
2
3
3
24.8
24.8
21.0
21.2
Nil
Nil
B
No.942
423
2.50
0.29
0.20
2.79
1.50
4
< 2
< 2
<2
16.57
25.00
12.64
21.01
Mo.
0.94
290
Nil
Nil
No. 104
240
0.18
1.80
< 2
< 2
25.15
29.57
0.27
Mo.
376
-5-
Oj O ffl
K11
K12
K13
K14
K15
K16
K17
nF
Note
o
I
*
03 DC
z^
m a
> op
z
1
-9 c/,
I
- ^r
Extr<
low S
MSR
Nil
<
Mn
O DO
.9P
Specimen :0.02/0.03C-1.5Mn-0.003S-25Cr-20Ni
Specimen :0.02/0.05C-1.5Mn-0.002P-25Cr-20Ni
fully 7-
fully 7
Aug. Strain: 1.0%
Thickness.:2.0mm
0.010
0.020
P(%)
0.030
0.010
0.020
0.030
S(%)
Fig. 2 Effect of P on hot-cracking susceptibility in fully austenitic weld Fig. 3-- Effect of S on hot-cracking susceptibility in fully austenitic weld
metal
metal
WELDING RESEARCH SUPPLEMENT | 85-s
< A
0O
a
o
. ^ - - ~ *
~"
m ^'"^ O
"ggg
A T
00
fully 7
,_
o
cc
<
25Cr-30Ni-3.7Mo-0.27Nblf' *^
MSR
25Cr-20Ni
J
D
25Cr-20Ni. low S.P
r~
LU
(A
CO
Ul
CC
A 25Cr-20Ni, Commercial
_l
a.
o
LJ
"ra
o
1-
_ i
>
-a-<
LU
Q
y\
\ \
\
\.^
v^\
\
J&*^~^^^
v\
<c^\^Jf^^
J^A
>^" Q O ^
\^0r
X
O
yCx
TJ
CD
s ' y
CO
/'
<<\
U)
0
tr
<
ui
<s>
ui
ra
"ra
CO
i_
-i-a
\ A^
^ D
low S P
S<CA^\^y
o
CU
^*<^
t
CN
>
cr
z
,_
LJ
/</^t*^\
a^PS**
9J < ^ \ \ \ V ^
o_
1 nr>
'
'
Augumented Strain
(%)
>
LU
Q
I
O
CC
<
LU
z
LLI
Nb.
a.
o
_i
UJ
>
LLI
o
or
<
UJ
a.
o
_ i
UJ
>
X
O
<
(/)
LLI
UJ
cc
Fig. 5 Effect of Si on hot-cracking susceptibility in
austenitic weld metal
Specimen :0.20Si-1.5Mn-0.003P-0.011S-24Cr-23Ni-0.04N
Specimen :0.013C-0.2Si-1.4Mn-0.003P-0.011S-24Cr-23Ni
"
a^
IS e
CJ
-C
*ir~~h~~t}
^cf ! "
i
O
o
.c
on
cID
o -
\
0.78NbV*
fully 7
\\
Nb
\
\\
_J
LO
.*o
\
\
0.78% 0.26%
\
\
CO
O
\^
\
\
aE
,
E
F-v5
^c
o
ro
J5
\
o \
co (1)
iS
in
C=
U "m
TJ
1
>s
o o ^
*o
"
o
I
m
o
r-
Ar
(Ar + 5%N)
N
1" <
I
JC
uo
c
5
rf
:S
sr
y
i o as
( A u g . S t r a i n 1.2%
70A-7.5cpm
1 p l a t e t h i c k n e s s 5.0mm
(0
2 E
Heat
6
7
(%/sec).
>
0
o
3
4
5
Augmented Strain Rate
T r e a t nent
CM
tn
9
co
welded
8 6 0 C X l 7 h r W.Q.
"o
i5
&
u
-22Ni-0.25Nb
CN
Commercial 310S
(25Cr-20Ni)
BJ 0)
m
*-
Specimen :0.20Si-t.5Mn-0.005P-0.004S-21Cr
fully
"
*
c(%)
(%)
o
o
h o t - c r a c k i n g susceptibility.
Figure 19 s h o w s the results of EPMA
analysis o f a crack in t h e fusion z o n e o f
the a b o v e dissimilar w e l d and indicates
extensive segregation of silicon at the
boundaries of the cellular dendrites. T h e
cracks in t h e w e l d b e a d , s h o w n in Fig.
15A, occur at boundaries o f cellular d e n drites, p r e d o m i n a n t l y at austenite grain
boundaries.
\f
[Aug. S t r a i n 1.2%
| Cond. 70A-7.5cpm
| Thickness, 5.0mm
\
\
0.26Nb
CN
Nb
\
* \
\
CM
o
o
^r
o
o
to
o
o
co
o
o
CN
{%)
in fully
Fig. 10 Influence of 8 ferrite on hot-cracking susceptibility in austenitic stainless steel weld metal
D^-
10
(Vol.%)-
-oD STEEL-A
A STEEL-B
O type 3 0 4
88-s | M A R C H 1982
Specimen :0.005C-0.20Si-1.5Mn-0.004P-0.003P-l8.6Cr-9.7Ni-0.025N
Specimen :0.015C-0.35Si-1.65Mn-17.6Cr-11.3Ni-0.015P-0.30Nb-0.01S
Jr
.
CN
j ^ r
N
a-.
ID
CO
J, 1
<
X _
cu o
1-^1
I N
c
IN
(1)
CO
s<.
L_
-(r+a)
E
.c
CO
L.
^ ^ ^
*-*
| / \ A u g . Strain 5.0%
111
tn
_l
JC
CO
O
CO
CO
CD
1-
:>
1 3 <"
CD
CO
CM
l/>
ID
CN
O
o
o
CD
CO
<0
>
N {%)
Fig. 11 (Above) Influence of N and 5 ferrite on hot-cracking
bilty in low G, Nb-containing stainless steel welds
*"
r
IJ
suscepti-
/*
CN
NT
CD
Nb(%)
CO
nO
CN
Specimen :0.02C-0.20Si-1.5Mn-0.005P-0.003S-18.8Cr-9.3/10Ni-0.25Nb
Specimen :Q.015C-0.35Si-1.65Mn-17.6Cr-10/9.4Ni-0.3Nb-0.007S
(NI
ru
r'-i
c
CD
Jen5.0mmt
70A-7.5cpm
Aug. S t r a i n 1.2%
_l
O
t7
3 m
o
To
,0
flu
ri
-(r+a)-
GTAW : 70A-7.5cm/min
thickness 5.0mm
"IS
Dw
-I f )
C/>; (/)</)
D r~-> D O
C/>
Ifl p,
Commercials
(3.5Si-0.025P-19Cr-13Ni/0.8Si-0.025P-25Cr-20r\li)
Dissimilar Weld Joint by GTAW
Ar shielded ; 15*/min
Crack Number in B u t t Weld
' "*-*V
II
- r*^\\^.
-- / '
^h
with filler*
' :,
.**
Total
/cr.ck
\ /cr,ck
\
Uength mm' Vlength mm/
.
* - >_.
10
19
(1.0/1.5) (1.0/l.5mm)
1.1
(1.5mm)
* :0.05C-3.7Si-1.9Mn-0.008P-0.005S-19Cr-10Ni
30//,
Fig. 16 Hot cracking susceptibility on TIGAMAIIG crack test and butt joint weld
metal
/rov
S i oxide
90-s I M A R C H 1982
Uft
Fig. 17 Fracture surface of hot cracking in
high-Si fully austenitic weld metal AES analysis
was made on a cell in the central part
50
100
500
1000
Ar s p u t t e r i n g time (sec)
13 5Si-19Crl3Ni-0 025P)steel
of eutectics which result from the reaction between the constituents which
form the isolated, rough features seen in
Figs. 20E and F, and the matrix in the
Specimen Current
..
^location of crack
te
a^jfeftiy^-y-
O.lOPAc
(3.5Si-19Cr-13Ni) '
/'(20O-30N,)
2.0mm thick plate
bun joint melt run by GTAW
110A-30cm
min
^0050p
-FeB G*T
Specimen Current
\d^l7
higher Nb steels. Similar reactions probably occur between the small pebble-like
sulfides shown in Fig. 20B and matrix in
lower Nb-containing steels.
The eutectic reaction (~1315C or
2399F) between niobium carbonitride
and 7 iron has been thought to be partly
responsible for high hot-cracking susceptibility of high-Nb austenitic stainless
steels (Ref. 6,20). However, in the case of
the low-Nb (0.25%) steel, little change
was observed in the hot-cracking susceptibility of specimens even when subjected to a precipitation heat treatment at
860C (1580F) for 17 h Fig. 9.
Conclusions
1. Fully austenitic stainless steels can
attain a highly improved hot-cracking
resistance, comparable to that of Type
304, if the segregation of phosphorus
and sulfur at grain boundaries is reFig. 21 (Below left) Segregation of Nb as
revealed by AES on a solidification crack surface in high-Nb stainless steel weld metal
center part of Fig. 20F
0 021C-0 1 9Si-1 58Mn-0 004P-0 004S
)
22.37Cr-21.06Ni 0.73Nb 0.095N
high Nb
( 24 34Cr-22.89Ni-0.24Nb-0.03N
Specimen
Ar bomb.: 220sec
Ar bomb.: 220sec
Ar bomb.: 60sec
Ar bomb.: 40sec
Ar bomb: 40sec
Ar bomb.: 10sec
Ar bomb.: 1 Osec
Ar bomb.: no
Ar bomb : non
Electron Volt(eV)
A "
100
200
300
400
'00
800
' J
6^J
IM
200
300
Kin
ZOv
J.-V"'
fe 4&X
SpecimenO.023C-OI9Si-l.53Mn-0.005P-0.004S-22.3Cr-2t.2Ni-0.73Nb-0.072N
After 360sec. c l e a n i n g t h r o u g h Ar bomb.
92-s | M A R C H 1982
stricted. This can be achieved by reducing both phosphorus and sulfur content
to less than 0.002%.
2. Increasing silicon increases hotcracking susceptibility of the fully austenitic weld metal in an almost linear
fashion.
3. Niobium increases hot-cracking susceptibility by segregating at grain boundaries during welding. This segregation
was confirmed by AES analysis of the
surfaces of both weld metal and heataffected zone cracks. The grain boundaries of Nb-containing steels are studded
with island-like reaction products that
contain considerable quantities of nio-
Ar sputtering (sec)
b i u m carbo-nitride.
4. Increasing
the
carbon
content
i m p r o v e s the hot-cracking resistance
considerably in steels w i t h a high n i o b i u m
c o n t e n t (0.78%), b u t this effect is less
p r o n o u n c e d w h e n n i o b i u m c o n t e n t is
l o w (0.26%).
.. s {-
5. Increasing t h e n i t r o g e n
content
i m p r o v e d the hot-cracking resistance of a
fully austenitic stainless steel (25%Cr-20%
Ni) w h i c h c o n t a i n e d n o n i o b i u m .
6. N i t r o g e n c o n t e n t s a b o v e 0.02% in
n i o b i u m - c o n t a i n i n g steels d e c r e a s e d the
hot-cracking resistance significantly, and
seems t o increase h o t - c r a c k i n g susceptibility slightly in d u p l e x w e l d s containing
niobium.
7. T h e 8 ferrite has a r e m a r k a b l e effect
in decreasing the hot-cracking susceptibility of austenitic stainless steel welds.
H o w e v e r , t h e e x t e n t of t h e e f f e c t varies
considerably w i t h chemical c o m p o s i t i o n .
Even w i t h 8 ferrite present, the w e l d
metal is not f r e e f r o m the effect of silicon,
niobium, phosphorus, nitrogen and other
elements, w h i c h t e n d t o increase h o t cracking susceptibility.
8. A f t e r e x p o s u r e t o a p r e c i p i t a t i o n
heat t r e a t m e n t at 8 6 0 C (1580F) for 17
h, l o w - N b (0.25%) fully austenitic stainless
steel s h o w e d n o significant change in its
hot-cracking susceptibility.
Acknowledgments
T h e authors express their g r a t i t u d e f o r
the helpful suggestions a n d discussions
f r o m Drs. Scoichi Nakanishi (Director) and
Harumasa Kakamura of t h e W e l d i n g
Research C e n t e r , Products R & D Laboratories, N i p p o n Steel C o r p o r a t i o n .
References
1. Savage, W . F., and Lundin, C. D. 1965.
The Varestraint test. Welding journal 44 (10):
433-s to 442-s.
2. Goodwin, G. M. 1968 (June). Ph. D.
thesis. Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute.
3. Hoerl, A., and Moore, Thomas ). 1957.