THE IMPACT OF PANTAWID PAMILYANG PILIPINO PROGRAM ON SOCIOECONOMIC STATUS OF SELECTED BENEFICIARIES IN LUCENA CITY

Chapter I
INTRODUCTION
Background of the study

Statement of the Problem

This study attempted to find out the Impact of Pantawid Pamilyang Pilipino Program
on socio-economic status of selected beneficiaries.
Specifically this study sought to answer the following questions:
1. What is the demographic profile of the respondents in terms of:
1.1

Age

1.2

Civil Status

1.3

Highest Education Attainment

1.4

Number of family member

2. What is the socio-economic status of the respondents?

2.1. Main source of livelihood
2.2. Monthly income
3. What are the benefits and their perception on this program?
4. Does Pantawid Pamilyang Pilipino Program helps to improve the conditions of the
beneficiaries?
5. What is the socio-economic impact of the program on the selected members of
Pantawid Pamilyang Pilipino Program?

Scope and Delimitation

The study was taken in Lucena City with the selected beneficiaries of Pantawid
Pamilyang Pilipino Program. The study covered the socio-economic status, the
improvement and changes on their lives through the help of this program. The researchers
gathered all information through the distribution of questionnaires to 50 respondents to
come up with comprehensive and reliable findings.

Significance of the Study

This study is important because it gives on how Pantawid Pamilyang Pilipino
Program helps to improve peoples lives. It will also give a picture of changes on the
lives of the respondents before and after availing benefits from Pantawid Pamilyang
Pilipino Program.
Conceptual Framework
INPUT
OUTPUT
PROCESS

Profile of the Respondents

1.1 Age
1.2 Civil Status
1.3 Highest Education
Attainment
1.4 Number of family
member
2. What is the socio-

economic status of
respondents?
2.1. Main source of
livelihood
2.2. Monthly income

the

Impact on socio-

Pantawid

economic status

Pamilyang

of selected

Pilipino

members in

Program

Lucena City

This study shows the profile of the respondents which composed of age, civil status,
highest education attainment and number of family member and family socio-economic
status which includes main source of livelihood and family monthly income. With these,
it links to 4Ps program and results to the expected the improvements of the individuals.

http://www.dlsu.edu.ph/conferences/dlsu_research_congress/2014/_pdf/proceedings/WC
F-004-FT.pdf

Questionnaire:
Unang bahagi: Ang bahaging ito ay tumutukoy sa inyong sarili. Pakisuyong lagyan ng
tsek ang blangko na tumutukoy sa kasagutan.
1. Gulang o edad
21-25

31-35

26-30

36 pataas

2. Katayuan sa buhay
May-asawa

Biyuda

Hiwalay
3. Naabot na Pinag-aralan
Nakatapos ng College

Nakatuntong ng Haiskul

Nakatuntong ng Kolehiyo

Nakatapos ng Elementarya

Nakatapos ng Haiskul

Nakatuntong ng Elementarya

4. Buwanang Kita
5,000 pababa

7,001-9,000

5,001-7,000

9,001- pataas

5. Bilang ng miyembro ng pamilya

3-5

10-12

6-9

13 - pataas

6. Trabaho/Hanap-buhay
Labandera

Katulong

Mananahi

Walang trabaho

Magtitinda

iba pa, pakisulat

7. Tagal o taon ng pagiging miyembro.

Isang taon pababa

4 - pataas

2-4
Ikalawang Bahagi: Pakisuyong lagyan ng tsek ( / ) ang puwang na tumutukoy sa iyong
sagot, kung ikaw ay:
MS - Matinding sumasang-ayon
S - Sumasang-ayon

MHS - Matinding hindi sumasang-ayon

WO - Walang opinyon

HS - Matinding hindi sumasang-ayon

The Relationship between Socioeconomic Status and Health: A Review of the Literature
Jonathan S. Feinstein
The Milbank Quarterly
Vol. 71, No. 2 (1993), pp. 279-322
Published by: Wiley on behalf of Milbank Memorial Fund
DOI: 10.2307/3350401
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3350401
Page Count: 44

Socioeconomic status (SES) is one of the most widely studied constructs in the social
sciences. Several ways of measuring SES have been proposed, but most include some
quantification of family income, parental education, and occupational status. Research
shows that SES is associated with a wide array of health, cognitive, and socioemotional
outcomes in children, with effects beginning prior to birth and continuing into adulthood.
A variety of mechanisms linking SES to child well-being have been proposed, with most

involving differences in access to material and social resources or reactions to stressinducing conditions by both the children themselves and their parents. For children, SES
impacts well-being at multiple levels, including both family and neighborhood. Its effects
are moderated by children's own characteristics, family characteristics, and external
support systems.
Socioeconomic Status and Child Development

Annual Review of Psychology

Vol. 53: 371-399 (Volume publication date February 2002)
DOI: 10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135233
Robert H. Bradley and Robert F. Corwyn
Center for Applied Studies in Education, University of Arkansas at Little Rock, 2801 S.
University Ave., Little Rock, Arkansas 72204; e-mail:rhbradley@ualr.edu
FULL-TEXT| PDF (204
KB)| Permissions | Reprints
Citation: PubMed| Web of Science | Download| Email notification|
Web of Science : Related Records | Times Cited: 959
.

Using meta-analysis techniques, almost 200 studies that considered the relation between
socioeconomic status (SES) and academic achievement (AA) were examined. Results
indicate that as SES is typically defined and used, it is only weakly correlated with AA.
With aggregated units of analysis, typically obtained correlations between SES and AA
jump to .73. Family characteristics, sometimes incorrectly referred to as SES, are
substantially correlated with AA when individuals are the unit of analysis. Factors such as
grade level at which the measurement was taken, type of AA measure, type of SES
measure, and the year in which the data were collected were significantly correlated with
the magnitude of the correlation between AA and SES. Variables considered in the metaanalysis accounted for 75% of the variance in observed correlation coefficients in the
studies examined. (6 p ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2012 APA, all rights
reserved)
The relation between socioeconomic status and academic achievement.
White, Karl R.
Psychological Bulletin, Vol 91(3), May 1982, 461-481.http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/00332909.91.3.461
http://psycnet.apa.org/journals/bul/91/3/461/http://psycnet.apa.org/journals/bul/91/3/
461/

http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/ungc/unpan040549.pdf
------

http://www.environment.gov.au/system/files/resources/27b104ce-ff21-43d8-9a7f2c51cbe821bd/files/nrsmpa-seia.pdf

https://www.academia.edu/1450620/Research_on_Socioeconomic_status_of_parents_and_academic_performances_of_SPAMAST-CAS_students
http://issuu.com/socialwatchphilippines/docs/cct_pantawid_philippines

http://www.imtfi.uci.edu/files/docs/2014/gusto_roque_cct_final_report.pdf