Professional Documents
Culture Documents
on Relations
Theories of
International
Research proposal
The First Great Debate - Did the
Realism/liberalism really happen? What was
its purpose?
Abstract
more cooperative world before even finding practical application if little success - after the Great War. Generally it felt that there
have been four international relations Great Debates,
Reliasm/Liberalism, Tradionalism/Behaviouralism,
Neoralism/Neoliberalism and the most recent one
Rationalism/Reflectivism.International relations is a field of
political science that is focused on relationships between countries,
the roles of sovereign states, inter-governmental organizations,
international non-governmental organizations, non-governmental
organizations and multinational corporations. International
relations analyze and formulates the foreign policy of a state.
International relations dates from the time of the Greek historian
Thucydides.
The "First Great Debate" also known as the "Realist-Idealist Great
Debate" was a dispute between idealists and realists and it took
place in the 1930s and 1940s and which is about how to deal with
Nazi Germany. Realists scholars emphasized the anarchical nature
of international politics and the need for state survival. Idealists
emphasized the possibility of international institutions such as the
League of Nations. However, some have argued that defining the
debate between realism and idealism in terms of a great debate is a
misleading caracature and so described the " great debate" as a
myth. So did the "First Debate Really happen"?
Introduction
International relations theory is about the study of international
relations but from a theoretical perspective, it tries to provide a
conceptual framework upon which international relations can be
analyzed. Ole Rudolf Holsti is an American political scientist and
academic, he describes international relations theories as acting
like pairs of coloured sunglasses that allows person who wears
them to see only salient events relevant to the theory. The most
popular theories are three realism, liberalism and constructivism.
They can be divided into positivist / rationalist theories that focus
on a principally state level analyses and post-positivist / reflectivist
that incorporate and expands the meanings of security from class to
gender.
Every international relations theory is reductive and essentialist to
different degrees and they are relying on different sets of
assumptions respectively. The usefulness of an international
relations theory is determined from the number and character of
the assumptions made. For example realism is parsimonious and
essential theory it is very useful for historical actions but it is
limited in explaining systematic change and unable to predict
future events. On the other hand liberalism examines a very wide
number of conditions but can be insightful while analyzing past
Realism
Realism is mainly focused on state security and power. It is also
known as political realism and it is a school of international
relations that is focused on national interest and security instead of
ideals or social reconstructions. Many people synonymous realism
with power politics. The international system in realism is
anarchic. The main purpose for the states is surviving, they are
using self-help dynamic. All human begins are ready to conflict.
National interest is not determined by personal morality because
states face one another as sovereign nation states not like
individuals. Politics function from interest and power not from
ethics.
The most important key assumptions for realism are:
The international system is anarchic.
There is no authority that is above states capable of
regulating their interactions
The relations between different states should not be dictated
from controlling entity about their arrival
International institutions, non-governmental organizations,
multinational corporations and individuals are having little
independent influence
All the relations between states are determined by their
comparative level of power from their military and economic
level
States are not guided by universal principles about their
actions, although they only must be aware of the actions of
the state around it, they have to deal with the problems that
arise
In international relations morality causes only reckless
commitments, diplomatic rigidity and may cause a conflict
Basically realists believe that mankind is not inherently
benevolent but more like self-centered and competitive. The
Hobbesian perspective views mankind as selfish and conflictual
unless you give them appropriate conditions under which to
start cooperate, contrasts with the approach of liberalism to
international relations. Realists also believe that all states are
inherently aggressive or obsessed with security issues and that a
Constructivism
Competing paradigms
Theoretical
Proposition
Realism
Liberalism
Constructivism
Self-interested
Concern for power
states competing for leaded by economic
power and security and political
considerations (desire
for prosperity and
commitment to liberal
values)
States
States
Main Instruments
Economic and
especially military
power
Modern Theorists
Kenneth Waltz,
Hans Morgenthau
Differs from
international
institutions, economic
exchange and
promotion of
democracy
Michael Doyle,
Robert Keohane
Keohane After
Hegemony
Fukuyama The end
of History?
Wendt Anarchy is
What States Make of
It
Koslowski &
Kratochwil
Understanding
Changes in
International Politics
Politics
Mearsheimer
Back to the Future:
Instability in
Europe after the
Cold War
Individuals - Elites
Alexander Wendt,
John Ruggie
Post-Cold War
predictions
Main Limitations
Agnostic because it
failed to predict the
content of ideas
Liberalism
Idealism is the precursor to liberal international theory and more
specifically Woodrow Wilson, which took place after the
institution builders after World War II. Idealists believe that a state
should make its internal political philosophy, their goal towards
foreign policy.
Liberalism holds that state preferences are more important than
state capabilities and are vital for the determination of states
behavior. Liberalism holds the idea for plurality in the state
actions, unlike realism where the state is viewed like a unitary
actor. Preferences will be different from state to another, depending
on economic system, culture and government type. Liberalists
believe that interaction between states is not limited to the
political/security, but also to economic and cultural - through
commercial firms, organizations or even individuals.
Unlike usual anarchic international system, there are many
opportunities for cooperation and broader notions of power like
cultural capital, for example the influence of firms may increase
the popularity of the countrys culture and can lead to a creation of
a market. Another assumptions is that absolute gains can be made
with co-operation and interdependence, it give us a conclusion that
peace can be achieved.
The hypothesis
Conclusion
I think that the "The First Great Debate' did take place, all the
Great Debates happened even though they have been glossed over
by some myths and readjustments. As some scholars have
suggested, that the Great Debates are "half-truth, or highly
distorted and overly simplistic caricature, rather than a complete
fiction" (Quirk and Vigneswaran 2005: 91). In short, any
metanarrative has always been colored and constructed for some
purpose. Nevertheless, the Great Debates maintain their virtues and
were very important by rectifying IR as a clear-cut discipline. This
is similar to Weaver's belief (2011) that the Great Debate narratives
are an integral part of the discipline, that should not be easily
dismissed. Today, years after the debate between idealists and
realists allegedly occurred, the first great debate continues to
occupy central places in the field's historical
consciousness.Although we now have a much better understanding
of the historiography of the whole field, the notion that a
disciplinary defining great debate took place in the 1930s and
1940s between idealists and realists continues to persists.
References :
1. Theories of International Relations Ole R Hosti
2. Neoclassical Realism and Theories of Foreign Policy
Gideon Rose
3. Neorealism in international relations Kenneth Waltz
4. Man, the state and War Kenneth Waltz
5. Theory of World Politics Keohane