Professional Documents
Culture Documents
21 January 2016
0900 1330
London Law Society
What is Quality?
We want to know what you think is the
definition of quality.
Use the sticky notes on your table.
Fill in the following statement:
Quality is ___________________.
Place your note(s) on the designated
flipchart.
Quality is
a combination of value and outcome in the eyes of the consumer
a product or service delivered with 100% satisfaction the first time, every time
a product or service that provides an expected value
a product that lasts, for the best price
a satisfied customer
a very good product or service - one you would want again
above standard results or outcomes
an excellent product or service delivered by professional, friendly,
knowledgeable people in a timely manner at the appropriate time
an unending struggle for excellence
accurate results to health care consumers
anticipation and fulfillment of needs
A vision which provides growth and satisfaction for the customer or consumer of
our service
attentive and excellent patient care
attention to detail, timeliness, competence
being the best, best of the best!
being present for every experience
best result possible in a given category
2015 Institute for Healthcare Improvement/R. C. Lloyd
What is Quality?
Florence Nightingale
(1820-1910)
Patient encounter
with physician
Independent Variables
Age
Coordination of Care
Gender
Current
health
status
Communication
Time 1
Time 2
3
Time 3
Patient Assessment
Score (could be
health outcomes,
functional status or
satisfaction)
R1
Age
R4
Coordination of care
Gender
R2
Current health
status
R3
RY
Communication
R5
3
Time 1
Time 2
Time 3
Patient Assessment
Score (could be
health outcomes,
functional status or
satisfaction)
13
W. Edwards
Deming
(1900 - 1993)
Walter
Shewhart
(1891 1967)
Joseph Juran
(1904 - 2008)
SOI
Knowledge
Improvement
SOI
Knowledge
R2
X
X
R4
X
2
Time 3
R3
Time 2
Time 1
R5
RY
Exercise
Assessing the Messiness of Life!
Do you think Commissioners and providers regularly view issues as
being rather messy and complex or do they see them as simple problems
that should be resolved quickly and easily (i.e., X causes Y)?
List a few of these messy problems that you are currently addressing and
appropriate?
Exercise
Assessing the Messiness of Life!
What is the topic of this
Messy Problem?
21
QA
QI
The Challenge
2015 Institute for Healthcare Improvement/R. C. Lloyd
The Challenge:
Moving from the Old Way to the New Way
Requirement,
Specification or
Threshold
No
action
taken
here
Better
Quality
Action taken
on all
occurrences
Reject
defectives
Worse
Old Way
(Quality Assurance)
Better
Quality
Worse
New Way
(Quality Improvement)
Deductive Phase
(general to specific)
Theoretical
Concepts
Information
for Decision
Making
Interpretation
of the Results
Theory
Select &
Define
Indicators
and
Prediction
Data
Collection
(plans & methods)
(asking why?)
Data
Analysis and
Output
Inductive Phase
(specific to general)
Source: Moen, R. and Norman, C. Circling Back: Clearing up Myths about the Deming
Cycle and Seeing How it Keeps Evolving, Quality Progress November, 2010:22-28.
F.Taylor-The Principles of
Scientific Management
(1911)
Michael George
(1991)- Integration
Toyoda Family
Kiichiro Toyoda
Sakichi Tooda
What is Lean?
In short
The choice of a quality system, approach
or model should be driven by the
objectives of the organization, its culture
and its products or services!
The decision should NOT be driven by
how popular a particular approach is or
even if it has been used successfully in
other settings.
Institute for Healthcare Improvement, 2004
Jurans
Quality
Trilogy
Quality
Control
Quality
Improvement
Demings System
of Profound
Knowledge
2015 Institute for Healthcare
Improvement/R. C. Lloyd
29
30
Quality Improvement
Quality Planning:
Setting aims
Selecting improvement projects
Selecting team and providing resources
31
32
Demings Lens of
Profound Knowledge
The system of profound
knowledge provides a
lens. It provides a new
map of theory by which
to understand and
optimise our
organisations.
Theory
of
Knowledge
Appreciation
of a system
QI
It provides an
opportunity for
dialogue and learning!
33
Understanding
Variation
Human
Behaviour
Theory of Knowledge
Human Behavior
What theories drive the
Interaction between people
system?
Intrinsic versus extrinsic
Can we predict?
motivation
Learning from theory and
Beliefs, values & assumptions
experience
What is the Will to change?
Operational definitions
(what does a concept
Understanding Variation
mean?)
Variation is to be expected!
PDSAs for learning and
Common or special causes of variation
improvement
Data for judgement or improvement?
Ranking, tampering & performance management
34
Potential sampling errors
Exercise
Profound Knowledge
Apply the Lens of Profound Knowledge to an improvement
project.
This is best accomplished with an improvement team.
Use the PK Worksheet (next page) to record your
responses. Remember that there are no right or wrong
responses.
Engage in a dialogue on PK (not a debate, a discussion or
idle chit-chat but rather a true dialogue about the theories
and assumptions surrounding the project and the degree to
which it is messy.
Human Behaviour
Theory of Knowledge
Understanding Variation
36
37
38
1996 API* added three basic questions to supplement the PDSA Cycle.
The PDSA Cycle is used to develop, test, and implement changes.
the Model
for
Improvement.
Improvement
Provides the Philosophical
and Theoretical Base for
Seven Propositions:
Dialogue
Science of Improvement
What is your current level of knowledge about the
Science of Improvement (SOI)?
Could you explain to a provider how the SOI can
help them to achieve better performance?
Are you and your colleagues prepared to engage in
a dialogue with providers on how to move from a QA
perspective to a QI perspective?
What structures and process can be established to
support providers in their quality journeys?
Research?
(testing theory and building
new knowledge; efficacy)
Accountability
or Judgement?
(making comparisons;
no change focus)
Improvement?
(improving the effectiveness or
efficiency of a process)
Improvement
Improvement of care
(efficiency & effectiveness)
Aim
Methods:
Test Observability
Bias
Test observable
Accountability
(Judgement)
Research
Comparison, choice,
reassurance, motivation for
change
Sample Size
Flexibility of
Hypothesis
No hypothesis
Fixed hypothesis
(null hypothesis)
Testing Strategy
Sequential tests
No tests
Determining if a
change is an
improvement
Analytic Statistics
(statistical process control)
Run & Control charts
No change focus
(maybe compute a percent
change or rank order the
results)
Enumerative Statistics
(t-test, F-test,
chi square,
p-values)
Confidentiality of
the data
Slide #45
Slide #46
Slide #46
As a
Research
Judgment
Improvement
As
Or,
Integrating the
Three Faces of Performance Measurement
The three faces of performance
measurement should not be seen as
mutually exclusive silos. This is not an
either/or situation.
Dialogue
Why are you measuring?
How much of your organizations energy is aimed at
improvement, accountability and/or research?
Does one form of performance measurement dominate
your journey?
Is your organization building silos or a Rubik's cube when it
comes to data collection and measurement?
50
It is possible, in an
enumerative problem, to
reduce errors of sampling
to any specified level. In
contrast, in an analytic
problem, it is impossible
to compute the risk of
making a wrong
decision.
On Probability as Basis for Action
W. E. Deming, The American
Statistician, November 1975, vol. 29,
No. 4. Pages 146-152.
53
Analytic: a River
58
59
D. Wheeler
Understanding
Variation, 1993.
Dialogue
Enumerative and Analytic Studies
61
Milestones in the
Quality Measurement Journey
AIM (How good? By when?)
Concept
Measure
Operational Definitions
Data Collection Plan
Data Collection
Analysis
ACTION
65
Milestones in the
Quality Measurement Journey
AIM reduce patient falls by 37% by the end of the year
Concept reduce patient falls
Measures Inpatient falls rate (falls per 1000 patient days)
Operational Definitions - # falls/inpatient days
Data Collection Plan weekly; no sampling; all IP units
Data Collection unit collects the data
Analysis control chart (u-chart)
ACTION
Milestones in the
Quality Measurement Journey
AIM
Concept
Measure
Operational Definitions
Data Collection Plan
Data Collection
Analysis
ACTION
67
of measures
69
as a cascade!
MACRO
Complication
rates
Percent compliance
with all bundles
Percent
compliance
with
Physical
observation
s bundle
Percent
compliance
with Cardiac
investigation
s bundle
MESO
+
MICRO
Percent
compliance
with
Pathology
investigation
s bundle
Concept
Measure
Operational Definitions
Data Collection Plan
Data Collection
Analysis
ACTION
71
Copyright 2013 Institute for Healthcare Improvement/R. Lloyd
72
73
The Problem!
Aggregated data presented in tabular
formats or with summary statistics,
will not help you measure the impact
of process improvement efforts.
Aggregated data can only lead to
judgment, not to improvement.
74
Percent of Patients
who Fall
5.2
5.0%
WOW!
A significant drop
from 5% to 4%
4.0%
3.8
Time 1
75
Time 2
Percent of Patients
who Fall
9.0
UCL= 6.0
5.0
CL = 4.0
LCL = 2.0
1.0
24 Months
76
Donald T. Campbell,
Ph.D., social
psychologist
(1916-1996)
Micromanagement
Kill the
Messenger
Filtered
Information
Source: William Scherkenbach. The Deming Route to Quality and Productivity. Ceep Press, Washington, DC, 1990, page 71.
A phenomenon will
be said to be
controlled when,
through the use of
past experience, we
can predict, at least
within limits, how the
phenomenon may be
expected to vary in
the future
81
UCL
time
LCL
Types of Variation
Common Cause Variation
82
NO
Only Common
Special + Common
If not at target
change the process
Increased
variation!
Wasted
resources!
(time, effort, morale,
money)
Source: Carey, R. and Lloyd, R. Measuring Quality Improvement in Healthcare: A Guide to Statistical Process
Control Applications. ASQ Press, Milwaukee, WI, 2001, page 153.
84
Questions
Dialogue
Common and Special Causes of Variation
Select several measures you review on a regular
basis.
Pe r c en t C- s e c t io n s
UCL = 2 7 . 7 0 1 8
25. 0
20. 0
CL=18. 0246
15. 0
10. 0
L CL = 8 . 3 4 7 3
6/ 99
4/ 99
2/ 99
8/ 98
12 / 98
6/ 98
4/ 98
10 / 98
2/ 98
8/ 97
6/ 97
12 / 97
4/ 97
10 / 97
2/ 97
8/ 96
12 / 96
6/ 96
10 / 96
4/ 96
2/ 96
12 / 95
0. 0
m ont h
5. 0
22. 5
20. 0
17. 5
15. 0
UCL = 1 3 . 3 9 4 6 1
12. 5
10. 0
7. 5
5. 0
CL = 4 . 4 2 0 4 8
2. 5
0. 0
L CL = 0 . 0 0 0 0 0
W eek
Conclusions
Understanding Variation
1. The same data can show different patterns of variation
dependent on how much of it you present and how you
statistically analyse and display the data.
2. Data presented over time (i.e., plotting the data by day,
week or month) is the only way you will ever be able to
improve any aspect of quality or safety!
3. Avoid using aggregated data and enumerative statistics if
you are serious about improving quality and safety!
4. A leaders job is to understand patterns of variation and
ask why!
Copyright 2013 Institute for Healthcare Improvement/R. Lloyd
1.0
UCL = 0.88
0.8
0.6
Mean = 0.54
0.4
0.2
LCL = 0.19
STATIC VIEW
Descriptive Statistics
Mean, Median & Mode
Minimum/Maximum/Range
Standard Deviation
Bar graphs/Pie charts
19
18
17
16
15
14
13
12
11
10
0.0
DYNAMIC VIEW
Run Chart
Control Chart
(plot data over time)
Statistical Process Control (SPC)
89
2015 Institute for Healthcare Improvement/R. C. Lloyd
Plotting data
over time to
understand the
variation!
Minutes ED to OR per
Patient
1200
1000
800
600
400
200
0
7 10 13 16 19 22 25 28 31 34 37 40 43 46 49 52 55 58 61 64
Sequential Patients
1200
1000
Minutes ED to OR per
Patient
Minutes ED to OR per
Patient
1200
800
600
400
200
1000
800
600
400
200
1 4 7 10 13 16 19 22 25 28 31 34 37 40 43 46 49 52 55 58 61 64
Sequential Patients
2. Determine if a change is an
improvement
1 4 7 10 13 16 19 22 25 28 31 34 37 40 43 46 49 52 55 58 61 64
Sequential Patients
Measure
A Run Chart:
is a time series plot of data
The centerline is the Median
4 Run Chart rules are used to determine
if there are random or non-random
patterns in the data
Time
Measure
Control Chart
A Control Chart:
is a time series plot of data
The centerline is the Mean
Added features include Upper and lower
control Limits (UCL & LCL)
5 Control Chart rules are used to
determine if the data reflect common or
special causes of variation
Time
92
Copyright 2013 Institute for Healthcare Improvement/R. Lloyd
Organisation Name
Region
April 14
May 14
Dementia
Dementia
Diagnosis Rate Diagnosis
Rate
NE
NW
NE
South
NE
South
South
South
NE
NW
South
NE
South
South
South
South
LAT
NW
NE
NE
South
South
Ne
NE
NW
NW
NW
NW
NE
NE
NW
South
NE
55.10
38.14
49.95
45.13
45.47
52.85
42.53
46.50
64.88
42.84
50.04
49.49
54.80
44.89
53.52
56.12
54.94
57.35
68.78
63.87
49.88
58.57
54.29
57.53
57.03
54.26
59.15
54.37
53.92
66.62
54.19
55.50
69.88
54.58
38.37
49.71
45.18
46.17
52.31
41.98
46.50
65.27
41.38
50.18
49.08
54.64
44.98
53.62
56.17
54.90
57.41
68.53
63.68
49.46
55.74
54.48
57.65
57.20
53.77
59.59
55.23
53.57
66.97
54.28
57.50
70.41
June 14
Dementia
Diagnosis
Rate
55.33
38.76
50.03
46.40
47.11
53.40
41.99
46.73
65.21
42.88
50.91
50.10
55.33
45.21
54.50
56.86
55.49
56.05
68.54
63.82
50.52
56.33
54.69
57.50
60.32
53.73
61.10
55.86
55.72
66.89
54.94
57.71
70.27
Organisation Name
Region
April 14 Dementia
Diagnosis Rate
May 14
Dementia
Diagnosis
Rate
June 14
Dementia
Diagnosis
Rate
July 14
Dementia
Diagnosis
Rate
October 14
November 14 December 14 January 15
February 15
March 15
Dementia
Dementia
Dementia
Dementia
Dementia
Dementia
Diagnosis Rate Diagnosis Rate Diagnosis Rate Diagnosis Rate Diagnosis Rate Diagnosis Rate
NE
55.10
54.58
55.33
55.57
54.31
56.25
59.47
61.69
62.77
62.84
63.07
63.96
NW
38.14
38.37
38.76
37.97
37.44
40.09
40.24
42.30
43.14
39.35
43.29
50.30
NE
49.95
49.71
50.03
49.21
48.18
48.98
49.30
53.45
55.71
56.05
57.38
59.62
South
45.13
45.18
46.40
45.51
44.13
47.94
54.31
54.63
56.68
55.82
56.21
55.56
NE
45.47
46.17
47.11
46.42
46.35
47.67
48.20
49.67
49.87
50.15
51.14
51.61
South
52.85
52.31
53.40
51.40
50.76
53.07
52.06
54.83
55.82
58.04
60.20
63.60
South
42.53
41.98
41.99
41.82
39.27
41.12
40.62
42.82
48.17
49.30
51.28
51.92
South
46.50
46.50
46.73
46.66
46.18
46.51
46.28
47.51
48.78
50.33
51.43
51.83
NE
64.88
65.27
65.21
63.84
62.56
65.02
66.57
67.39
67.00
67.45
67.00
68.73
NW
42.84
41.38
42.88
41.62
41.75
42.37
42.99
43.95
47.09
48.72
52.40
54.23
South
50.04
50.18
50.91
49.86
51.11
50.41
50.38
51.87
52.63
53.65
55.41
57.56
NE
49.49
49.08
50.10
48.14
49.03
51.91
52.29
52.51
53.78
55.68
56.44
59.73
South
54.80
54.64
55.33
55.60
55.77
56.84
56.12
57.78
59.72
59.88
62.95
69.33
South
44.89
44.98
45.21
43.81
43.46
44.94
48.07
48.22
49.51
49.99
52.30
57.56
South
53.52
53.62
54.50
53.77
54.28
52.96
53.33
52.61
52.94
53.17
58.36
61.52
South
56.12
56.17
56.86
56.03
54.87
55.95
55.78
56.48
55.92
56.37
58.62
58.61
LAT
54.94
54.90
55.49
54.72
54.51
55.62
56.35
57.79
58.87
60.33
62.60
65.79
NW
57.35
57.41
56.05
55.77
53.71
57.91
61.53
63.26
64.69
65.23
68.57
73.06
NE
68.78
68.53
68.54
66.51
66.17
67.83
68.83
67.96
68.22
68.54
69.41
70.22
NE
63.87
63.68
63.82
64.14
62.66
63.85
63.71
63.93
64.77
65.81
65.68
68.35
South
49.88
49.46
50.52
49.75
49.48
51.86
51.30
52.39
53.52
55.80
57.52
66.45
South
58.57
55.74
56.33
55.66
58.04
57.16
58.52
63.19
63.47
64.39
67.49
68.54
Ne
54.29
54.48
54.69
53.99
53.25
54.09
53.77
56.48
56.52
62.97
66.36
70.31
NE
57.53
57.65
57.50
57.47
56.60
57.57
57.78
57.96
58.52
62.64
64.30
67.70
NW
57.03
57.20
60.32
60.41
60.17
62.23
61.47
60.11
60.49
62.94
65.63
68.18
NW
54.26
53.77
53.73
53.43
52.84
54.26
54.73
54.25
55.18
57.55
61.99
69.68
NW
59.15
59.59
61.10
59.67
59.97
62.60
62.17
63.25
63.38
64.76
69.88
71.68
NW
54.37
55.23
55.86
55.80
55.05
55.89
56.58
58.87
59.58
66.06
68.97
70.70
NE
53.92
53.57
55.72
54.85
53.21
54.16
53.48
54.30
55.31
56.94
61.17
64.23
NE
66.62
66.97
66.89
66.86
67.54
66.52
66.71
66.45
66.14
71.40
71.93
73.09
NW
54.19
54.28
54.94
54.49
56.45
54.80
55.13
57.21
57.60
57.91
60.14
62.98
South
55.50
57.50
57.71
57.71
57.53
58.18
62.70
63.80
64.74
64.99
65.28
64.30
NE
69.88
70.41
70.27
69.39
67.82
69.03
68.85
69.08
71.27
72.91
74.70
77.83
80.00
75.00
70.00
65.00
UCL
60.00
Mean = 57.6
55.00
LCL
50.00
45.00
40.00
Mar-15
Feb-15
Jan-15
Dec-14
Nov-14
Oct-14
Sep-14
Aug-14
Jul-14
Jun-14
May-14
35.00
Apr-14
80.00
75.00
70.00
65.00
60.00
UCL
55.00
Mean = 53.5
LCL
50.00
45.00
40.00
Mar-15
Feb-15
Jan-15
Dec-14
Nov-14
Oct-14
Sep-14
Aug-14
Jul-14
Jun-14
May-14
35.00
Apr-14
35
Apr-14
May-14
Jun-14
Jul-14
Aug-14
Sep-14
Oct-14
Nov-14
Dec-14
Jan-15
Feb-15
Mar-15
Apr-14
May-14
Jun-14
Jul-14
Aug-14
Sep-14
Oct-14
Nov-14
Dec-14
Jan-15
Feb-15
Mar-15
Apr-14
May-14
Jun-14
Jul-14
Aug-14
Sep-14
Oct-14
Nov-14
Dec-14
Jan-15
Feb-15
Mar-15
50
LCL
65
UCL
UCL
55
50
45
UCL
UCL
LCL
LCL
UCL
UCL
55
UCL
UCL
LCL
NHS Lewisham
CCG - I Chart
NHS Wandsworth
CCG - I Chart
NHS West London
(K&C & QPP) CCG
- I Chart
75
65
UCL
LCL
40
LCL
Apr-14
May-14
Jun-14
Jul-14
Aug-14
Sep-14
Oct-14
Nov-14
Dec-14
Jan-15
Feb-15
Mar-15
40
UCL
Dashboard of 18 London Area Teams Dementia Diagnosis Rates, April 2014-March 2015
Apr-14
May-14
Jun-14
Jul-14
Aug-14
Sep-14
Oct-14
Nov-14
Dec-14
Jan-15
Feb-15
Mar-15
45
Apr-14
May-14
Jun-14
Jul-14
Aug-14
Sep-14
Oct-14
Nov-14
Dec-14
Jan-15
Feb-15
Mar-15
70
Apr-14
May-14
Jun-14
Jul-14
Aug-14
Sep-14
Oct-14
Nov-14
Dec-14
Jan-15
Feb-15
Mar-15
Apr-14
May-14
Jun-14
Jul-14
Aug-14
Sep-14
Oct-14
Nov-14
Dec-14
Jan-15
Feb-15
Mar-15
40
NHS Redbridge
CCG - I Chart
Apr-14
May-14
Jun-14
Jul-14
Aug-14
Sep-14
Oct-14
Nov-14
Dec-14
Jan-15
Feb-15
Mar-15
60
LCL
Apr-14
May-14
Jun-14
Jul-14
Aug-14
Sep-14
Oct-14
Nov-14
Dec-14
Jan-15
Feb-15
Mar-15
50
Apr-14
May-14
Jun-14
Jul-14
Aug-14
Sep-14
Oct-14
Nov-14
Dec-14
Jan-15
Feb-15
Mar-15
80
Apr-14
May-14
Jun-14
Jul-14
Aug-14
Sep-14
Oct-14
Nov-14
Dec-14
Jan-15
Feb-15
Mar-15
35
Apr-14
May-14
Jun-14
Jul-14
Aug-14
Sep-14
Oct-14
Nov-14
Dec-14
Jan-15
Feb-15
Mar-15
45
Apr-14
May-14
Jun-14
Jul-14
Aug-14
Sep-14
Oct-14
Nov-14
Dec-14
Jan-15
Feb-15
Mar-15
55
Apr-14
May-14
Jun-14
Jul-14
Aug-14
Sep-14
Oct-14
Nov-14
Dec-14
Jan-15
Feb-15
Mar-15
Oct-14
Nov-14
Dec-14
Jan-15
Feb-15
Mar-15
80
Apr-14
May-14
Jun-14
Jul-14
Aug-14
Sep-14
Oct-14
Nov-14
Dec-14
Jan-15
Feb-15
Mar-15
35
Apr-14
May-14
Jun-14
Jul-14
Aug-14
Sep-14
Oct-14
Nov-14
Dec-14
Jan-15
Feb-15
Mar-15
Apr-14
May-14
Jun-14
Jul-14
Aug-14
Sep-14
NHS Havering
CCG - I Chart
NHS Richmond
CCG - I Chart
70
65
UCL
UCL
UCL
LCL
LCL
LCL
75
UCL
60
LCL
UCL
LCL
LCL
LCL
LCL
70
UCL
UCL
LCL
UCL
LCL
LCL
Exercise
Understanding Variation across 18 CCGs
100
35
Apr-14
May-14
Jun-14
Jul-14
Aug-14
Sep-14
Oct-14
Nov-14
Dec-14
Jan-15
Feb-15
Mar-15
Apr-14
May-14
Jun-14
Jul-14
Aug-14
Sep-14
Oct-14
Nov-14
Dec-14
Jan-15
Feb-15
Mar-15
Apr-14
May-14
Jun-14
Jul-14
Aug-14
Sep-14
Oct-14
Nov-14
Dec-14
Jan-15
Feb-15
Mar-15
50
LCL
65
UCL
UCL
55
50
45
UCL
UCL
LCL
LCL
UCL
UCL
55
UCL
UCL
LCL
NHS Lewisham
CCG - I Chart
NHS Wandsworth
CCG - I Chart
NHS West London
(K&C & QPP) CCG
- I Chart
75
65
UCL
LCL
40
LCL
Apr-14
May-14
Jun-14
Jul-14
Aug-14
Sep-14
Oct-14
Nov-14
Dec-14
Jan-15
Feb-15
Mar-15
40
UCL
Dashboard of 18 London Area Teams Dementia Diagnosis Rates, April 2014-March 2015
Apr-14
May-14
Jun-14
Jul-14
Aug-14
Sep-14
Oct-14
Nov-14
Dec-14
Jan-15
Feb-15
Mar-15
45
Apr-14
May-14
Jun-14
Jul-14
Aug-14
Sep-14
Oct-14
Nov-14
Dec-14
Jan-15
Feb-15
Mar-15
70
Apr-14
May-14
Jun-14
Jul-14
Aug-14
Sep-14
Oct-14
Nov-14
Dec-14
Jan-15
Feb-15
Mar-15
Apr-14
May-14
Jun-14
Jul-14
Aug-14
Sep-14
Oct-14
Nov-14
Dec-14
Jan-15
Feb-15
Mar-15
40
NHS Redbridge
CCG - I Chart
Apr-14
May-14
Jun-14
Jul-14
Aug-14
Sep-14
Oct-14
Nov-14
Dec-14
Jan-15
Feb-15
Mar-15
60
LCL
Apr-14
May-14
Jun-14
Jul-14
Aug-14
Sep-14
Oct-14
Nov-14
Dec-14
Jan-15
Feb-15
Mar-15
50
Apr-14
May-14
Jun-14
Jul-14
Aug-14
Sep-14
Oct-14
Nov-14
Dec-14
Jan-15
Feb-15
Mar-15
80
Apr-14
May-14
Jun-14
Jul-14
Aug-14
Sep-14
Oct-14
Nov-14
Dec-14
Jan-15
Feb-15
Mar-15
35
Apr-14
May-14
Jun-14
Jul-14
Aug-14
Sep-14
Oct-14
Nov-14
Dec-14
Jan-15
Feb-15
Mar-15
45
Apr-14
May-14
Jun-14
Jul-14
Aug-14
Sep-14
Oct-14
Nov-14
Dec-14
Jan-15
Feb-15
Mar-15
55
Apr-14
May-14
Jun-14
Jul-14
Aug-14
Sep-14
Oct-14
Nov-14
Dec-14
Jan-15
Feb-15
Mar-15
Oct-14
Nov-14
Dec-14
Jan-15
Feb-15
Mar-15
80
Apr-14
May-14
Jun-14
Jul-14
Aug-14
Sep-14
Oct-14
Nov-14
Dec-14
Jan-15
Feb-15
Mar-15
35
Apr-14
May-14
Jun-14
Jul-14
Aug-14
Sep-14
Oct-14
Nov-14
Dec-14
Jan-15
Feb-15
Mar-15
Apr-14
May-14
Jun-14
Jul-14
Aug-14
Sep-14
NHS Havering
CCG - I Chart
NHS Richmond
CCG - I Chart
70
65
UCL
UCL
UCL
LCL
LCL
LCL
75
UCL
60
LCL
UCL
LCL
LCL
LCL
LCL
70
UCL
UCL
LCL
UCL
LCL
LCL
I knowwhat can
a CCG do to
improve system
performance?
104
Falls
Medication
errors
Physical
violence
Pressure
ulcers
Reducing
Harm
It starts with
having a
strategic focus!
Restraints
Reliable delivery
of evidencebased care
Improving
patient and
carer
experience
Reducing delays
and
inefficiencies in
the system
Right care,
right place,
right time
Improved access
to services at
the right
location
Secondary Drivers
AIM
It then
requires
identifying
the factors
that drive the
outcomes!
2015 Institute for Healthcare Improvement/R. C. Lloyd
Experts by experience
All staff
Staff involved in or
leading QI projects
Internal
experts (QI
team)
30 QI coaches graduating in
January 2016. To identify and train
second cohort in mid-late 2016
QI coaches
Board
Quality Dashboard
(organisation-level view)
Safety
ACCESS TO SERVICES
COLLABORATIVE
DASHBOARD
December 2015
Jan-14
Oct-15
LCL
Nov-15
Nov-15
LCL
Oct-15
Oct-15
Sep-15
Aug-15
Jul-15
Jun-15
May-15
Apr-15
Mar-15
Feb-15
Jan-15
Dec-14
Nov-14
Oct-14
Sep-14
Aug-14
Jul-14
Jun-14
May-14
55
Sep-15
Aug-15
Jul-15
Jun-15
May-15
Apr-15
Mar-15
Feb-15
Jan-15
Dec-14
Nov-14
Oct-14
Sep-14
Aug-14
Jul-14
Jun-14
May-14
800
Apr-14
LCL
28%
Mar-14
1211.0
Feb-14
UCL
DNA / %
1400
Jan-14
Nov-15
1200
Sep-15
Aug-15
Jul-15
Jun-15
May-15
Apr-15
Mar-15
Feb-15
Jan-15
Dec-14
Nov-14
Apr-14
Mar-14
Feb-14
Jan-14
45
Oct-14
Sep-14
Aug-14
Jul-14
Jun-14
May-14
Apr-14
Mar-14
1100
Feb-14
No. of Referrals
70
Average waiting time from referral to 1st face to face appt (Collaborative, 9/11 teams) - X-bar Chart
UCL
65
60.7
60
52.2
50
40
38%
UCL
1300
33%
32.50%
25.52%
1021.8
1000
900
23%
18%
Jan-14
100
Jan-15
Nov-15
Oct-15
Sep-15
Aug-15
Jul-15
Jun-15
May-15
Apr-15
Mar-15
Feb-15
Dec-14
Nov-14
Oct-14
Nov-15
Oct-15
Sep-15
Aug-15
Jul-15
Jun-15
May-15
Apr-15
Mar-15
Feb-15
Jan-15
Dec-14
Nov-14
Oct-14
Sep-14
Aug-14
Jul-14
Jun-14
May-14
Apr-14
Mar-14
Feb-14
95
Sep-14
Aug-14
Jul-14
Jun-14
May-14
20%
Apr-14
211.7
Mar-14
40%
Feb-14
DNA / %
250
Jan-14
Nov-15
Oct-15
Sep-15
Aug-15
Jul-15
Jun-15
May-15
Apr-15
Mar-15
Feb-15
Jan-15
Dec-14
Nov-14
Oct-14
Sep-14
Aug-14
Jul-14
Jun-14
May-14
200
Apr-14
85
Mar-14
Jan-14
105
Feb-14
No. of Referrals
SERVICE LEVEL
Psychological Therapy Service (City and Hackney, Newham & Tower Hamlets)
- Baseline data
December 2015
Average waiting time from referral to 1st face to face appt (PTS) - X-bar Chart
125
UCL
115
104.0
88.9
LCL
75
65
45%
% of 1st face to face appt DNAs (PTS) - P Chart
300
UCL
UCL
35%
30%
29.75%
25%
150
LCL
15%
LCL
10%
Jan-14
0
0%
Nov-15
Oct-15
Sep-15
Aug-15
Jul-15
Jun-15
May-15
LCL
Apr-15
Mar-15
Feb-15
Jan-15
Dec-14
Nov-14
Oct-14
Sep-14
Aug-14
Jul-14
Jun-14
May-14
20
Apr-14
20%
Mar-14
40
30%
Feb-14
60
DNA / %
58.4
Jan-14
Nov-15
Oct-15
Sep-15
Aug-15
Jul-15
Jun-15
May-15
Apr-15
Mar-15
Feb-15
Jan-15
Dec-14
Nov-14
Oct-14
Sep-14
Aug-14
Jul-14
Jun-14
May-14
Nov-15
Oct-15
Sep-15
Aug-15
Jul-15
Jun-15
May-15
Apr-15
Mar-15
Feb-15
Jan-15
Dec-14
Nov-14
Oct-14
Sep-14
Aug-14
Jul-14
Jun-14
May-14
Apr-14
Mar-14
Feb-14
Jan-14
60
Apr-14
Mar-14
100
Feb-14
No. of Referrals
TEAM LEVEL
QI0043 & QI0175 Newham Psychological Therapy Service
- Baseline data
December 2015
Average waiting time from referral to 1st face to face appt (NH PTS) - X-bar Chart
140
120
UCL
100
80
85.4
LCL
40
56.6
20
UCL
60%
50%
80
UCL
40%
32.73%
22.91%
LCL
10%
Jan-14
30
Nov-15
Oct-15
Sep-15
Aug-15
Jul-15
Jun-15
May-15
Apr-15
Mar-15
Feb-15
Jan-15
Dec-14
Nov-14
5%
Oct-14
50
Sep-14
90
Jul-14
Aug-14
110
20%
Jun-14
124.6
May-14
170
Apr-14
30%
Mar-14
190
Feb-14
150
DNA / %
UCL
Jan-14
Nov-15
Oct-15
Sep-15
Aug-15
Jul-15
Jun-15
May-15
Apr-15
Mar-15
Feb-15
Jan-15
Dec-14
Nov-14
Oct-14
Sep-14
Aug-14
Jul-14
Jun-14
130
May-14
Nov-15
Oct-15
Sep-15
Aug-15
Jul-15
Jun-15
May-15
Apr-15
Mar-15
Feb-15
Jan-15
Dec-14
Nov-14
Oct-14
Sep-14
Aug-14
Jul-14
Jun-14
May-14
Apr-14
Mar-14
Feb-14
25
Apr-14
Jan-14
15
Mar-14
210
Feb-14
No. of Referrals
TEAM LEVEL
QI0104 Newham Memory Service
- Baseline data
December 2015
50
Average waiting time from referral to 1st face to face appt (NH Memory Service) - X-bar Chart
45
40
UCL
35
30
28.5
20
LCL
10
35%
UCL
25%
17.20%
15%
70
10%
LCL
LCL
0%
ork begins
LCL
ns with wards
nce work
4
100
80
2
60
40
20
0
0
06-Jan-14
20-Jan-14
03-Feb-14
17-Feb-14
03-Mar-14
17-Mar-14
31-Mar-14
14-Apr-14
28-Apr-14
12-May-
26-May-
09-Jun-14
23-Jun-14
07-Jul-14
21-Jul-14
04-Aug-14
18-Aug-14
01-Sep-14
15-Sep-14
29-Sep-14
13-Oct-14
27-Oct-14
10-Nov-14
24-Nov-14
08-Dec-14
22-Dec-14
05-Jan-15
19-Jan-15
02-Feb-15
16-Feb-15
02-Mar-15
16-Mar-15
30-Mar-15
13-Apr-15
27-Apr-15
11-May-
25-May-
08-Jun-15
22-Jun-15
06-Jul-15
20-Jul-15
03-Aug-15
17-Aug-15
31-Aug-15
14-Sep-15
28-Sep-15
12-Oct-15
26-Oct-15
09-Nov-15
23-Nov-15
07-Dec-15
21-Dec-15
14
UCL
12
10
5.8
UCL
LCL
35.0
PDSA DATA
(AFTER)
Learnin
g Set 1
Learning
Set 4
Learning
Set 6 &
QI Work begins
LCL
4
100
80
2
60
40
20
0
0
06-Jan-14
20-Jan-14
03-Feb-14
17-Feb-14
03-Mar-14
17-Mar-14
31-Mar-14
14-Apr-14
28-Apr-14
12-May-
26-May-
09-Jun-14
23-Jun-14
07-Jul-14
21-Jul-14
04-Aug-14
18-Aug-14
01-Sep-14
15-Sep-14
29-Sep-14
13-Oct-14
27-Oct-14
10-Nov-14
24-Nov-14
08-Dec-14
22-Dec-14
05-Jan-15
19-Jan-15
02-Feb-15
16-Feb-15
02-Mar-15
16-Mar-15
30-Mar-15
13-Apr-15
27-Apr-15
11-May-
25-May-
08-Jun-15
22-Jun-15
06-Jul-15
20-Jul-15
03-Aug-15
17-Aug-15
31-Aug-15
14-Sep-15
28-Sep-15
12-Oct-15
26-Oct-15
09-Nov-15
23-Nov-15
07-Dec-15
21-Dec-15
16
14
UCL
12
10
5.8
UCL
2.5
LCL
35.0
BASELINE DATA
(BEFORE)
PDSA DATA
(AFTER)
Learnin
g Set 1
Learnin
g Set 2
Introduce safety
culture bundle
Learning
Set 4
Learning
Set 3
Learning
Set 6 &
General
Adult
wards go
Learning Set 5: Safety smoke
Learning
free
Huddle outcomes
Set 7
0
LCL
100
06-Jan-14
20-Jan-14
03-Feb-14
17-Feb-14
03-Mar-14
17-Mar-14
31-Mar-14
14-Apr-14
28-Apr-14
12-May-
26-May-
09-Jun-14
23-Jun-14
07-Jul-14
21-Jul-14
04-Aug-14
18-Aug-14
01-Sep-14
15-Sep-14
29-Sep-14
13-Oct-14
27-Oct-14
10-Nov-14
24-Nov-14
08-Dec-14
22-Dec-14
05-Jan-15
19-Jan-15
02-Feb-15
16-Feb-15
02-Mar-15
16-Mar-15
30-Mar-15
13-Apr-15
27-Apr-15
11-May-
25-May-
08-Jun-15
22-Jun-15
06-Jul-15
20-Jul-15
03-Aug-15
17-Aug-15
31-Aug-15
14-Sep-15
28-Sep-15
12-Oct-15
26-Oct-15
09-Nov-15
23-Nov-15
07-Dec-15
21-Dec-15
16
14
UCL
12
10
5.8
UCL
50
2.5
LCL
35.0
BASELINE DATA
(BEFORE)
PDSA DATA
(AFTER)
Learnin
g Set 1
Learnin
g Set 2
Introduce safety
culture bundle
Learning
Set 4
Learning
Set 3
Learning
Set 6 &
General
Adult
wards go
Learning Set 5: Safety smoke
Learning
free
Huddle outcomes
Set 7
Measurement Self-Assessment
Response Options
Use the following Response Scale. Select the one response which
best captures your opinion.
1. I'd definitely have to call in an outside expert to explain and
apply this topic/method.
Source: R. Lloyd, Quality Health Care: A Guide to Developing and Using Indicators. Jones & Bartlett Publishers, 2004: 301-304.
Response Scale
1
1. Help people in my organization understand where and how measurement fits into our quality journey
2. Facilitate the development of clear Aim Statements
3. Move teams from concepts to specific quantifiable measures
4. Building clear and unambiguous operational definitions for our measures
5. Develop data collection plans (including stratification and sampling strategies)
6. Explain why plotting data over time (dynamic display) is preferable to using aggregated data and
summary statistics (static display)
7.Explain the differences between random and non-random variation
8. Construct run charts (including locating the median)
9. Explain the reasoning behind the run chart rules
10. Interpret run charts by applying the run chart rules
11. Explain the various types of control charts and how they differ from run charts
12. Construct the various types of control charts
13. Explain the control chart rules for special causes and interpret control charts
14. Help teams link measurement to their improvement efforts
Source: R. Lloyd, Quality Health Care: A Guide to Developing and Using Indicators. Jones & Bartlett Publishers, 2004: 301-304.
Fe b r u a r y
A p r il
30. 0
27. 5
Intervention
25. 0
22. 5
M in u t e s
20. 0
17. 5
UCL = 1 5 . 3
A
15. 0
12. 5
C
CL = 1 0 . 7
C
B
A
L CL = 6 . 1
10. 0
7. 5
Baseline
Period
5. 0
2. 5
1
3
2
5
4
7
6
9
8
11
10
Where
will the
process
go?
13
12
15
14
17
16
19
18
1 6 Pa t ie n t s in Fe b r u a r y a n d
21
Xm R Char t
Fe b r u a r y
A p r il
30. 0
27. 5
Intervention
25. 0
22. 5
M in u t e s
20. 0
17. 5
UCL = 1 5 . 3
A
15. 0
12. 5
C
CL = 1 0 . 7
C
B
A
L CL = 6 . 1
10. 0
7. 5
Baseline
Period
5. 0
2. 5
1
3
2
5
4
7
6
9
8
11
10
13
12
15
14
17
16
19
18
21
20
23
22
25
24
27
26
1 6 Pa t ie n t s in Fe b r u a r y a n d 1 6 Pa t ie n t s in Ap r il
29
28
31
30
32
A Special Cause is
detected
A run of 8 or more
data points on one
side of the centerline
reflecting a sift in the
process
Fe b r u a r y
A p r il
30. 0
27. 5
Intervention
25. 0
22. 5
M in u t e s
20. 0
17. 5
UCL = 1 5 . 3
A
15. 0
12. 5
C
CL = 1 0 . 7
C
B
A
L CL = 6 . 1
10. 0
7. 5
Baseline
Period
5. 0
2. 5
1
3
2
5
4
7
6
9
8
11
10
13
12
15
14
17
16
19
18
21
20
23
22
25
24
27
26
1 6 Pa t ie n t s in Fe b r u a r y a n d 1 6 Pa t ie n t s in Ap r il
29
28
31
30
32
A few thoughts on
Benchmarking
132
A benchmark is a noun.
Benchmarking, on the other hand, is a verb that requires
exploration and investigation of why the benchmark number
was achieved!
2015 Institute for Healthcare Improvement/R. C. Lloyd
Benchmarking versus
Comparative Reference Data
133
Or,
regional or
national
norms
Source: R. Lloyd. Quality Health Care: A Guide to Developing and Using Indicators. Jones and Bartlett Publishers, 2004.
137
138
139
Dialogue
Setting Targets and Goals
140
Suggestions on
Setting Targets and Goals
141
Will
Developing Ideas
that will contribute
to making
processes and
outcome better
QI
Ideas
Execution
Self-Assessment
Medium High
Medium High
Low
Medium High
Execution
Focusing on
one or even two of the components will guarantee suboptimised performance. Systems thinking lies at the heart of QI!
A closing thought
It must be remembered that there is nothing
more difficult to plan, more doubtful of
success, nor more dangerous to manage than
the creation of a new system.
For the initiator has the enmity of all who
would profit by the preservation of the old
institution and merely lukewarm defenders
in those who would gain by the new one.
Machiavelli, The Prince, 1513
Appendix A
What is Lean?
Suppliers
Design &
Redesign of
Processes &
Products
Plan to
Improve
Market
Research
Measurement
& Feedback
Customers
A
B
C
D
E
F
Purpose of the
Organization
Distribution
Support Processes
Evolution of Quality
Management
Theory of
Management
Focus of management is on
production at low cost.
Improvement requires
partnership between
suppliers and customers.
Simplification objective
establishes the Q.C.
Department to measure and
report.
Impact on Quality
Age of
Quality Management
1950's - Present
Craftsman is responsible
for communication with
suppliers and customers.
Direct customer
feedback provides the
definition of quality.
Quality is achieved by
inspection and sorting.
Taguchi
149
150
Quality
Scientific
Approach
All One
Team
Hippocrates (3rd century B.C.). Medicine was and is taught and learned as a craft.
1973
1986
1990
NDP report: Berwick, D, Godfrey, J and Roessner, J. Curing Health Care. Jossey-Bass,
1990.
1991
Don Berwick founded the Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI) committed to
redesigning health care delivery systems in order to ensure the best health care
outcomes at the lowest costs.
1993
IHI adopts API Model for Improvement as its foundation for Improvement.
Source: Ron Moen, Associates in Process in Improvement
152
153
154
What is Lean
Reducing the timeline from
customer order to building and
delivering a product by
eliminating waste
- Jeff Liker, The Toyota Way
Why Lean?
155
156
157
waste.
Make value flow from beginning to end.
Based on the pull of the customer.
In pursuit of perfection.
158
5 S Workplace Organization
Visual Management
Continuous Flow / Cell / JIT
Production Layout
Small Lot Production
Quick Setup / Changeover
TPM (Total Productive Maintenance)
Standardized Work
Level Scheduling
Pull System KANBAN
Supplier Rationalization
Appendix B
General References on Quality
The Improvement Guide: A Practical Approach to Enhancing
Organizational Performance. G. Langley, K. Nolan, T. Nolan, C.
Norman, L. Provost. Jossey-Bass Publishers., San Francisco, 1996.
Quality Improvement Through Planned Experimentation. 2nd edition. R.
Moen, T. Nolan, L. Provost, McGraw-Hill, NY, 1998.
The Improvement Handbook. Associates in Process Improvement.
Austin, TX, January, 2005.
A Primer on Leading the Improvement of Systems, Don M. Berwick,
BMJ, 312: pp 619-622, 1996.
Accelerating the Pace of Improvement - An Interview with Thomas
Nolan, Journal of Quality Improvement, Volume 23, No. 4, The Joint
Commission, April, 1997.
159
Appendix C
References on Measurement
Brook, R. et. al. Health System Reform and Quality. Journal of the
American Medical Association 276, no. 6 (1996): 476-480.
Carey, R. and Lloyd, R. Measuring Quality Improvement in healthcare: A
Guide to Statistical Process Control Applications. ASQ Press, Milwaukee,
WI, 2001.
Appendix D
Robert Lloyd, PhD Bio
Robert Lloyd, PhD is Vice President for the Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI). Dr.
Lloyd provides leadership in the areas of performance improvement strategies, statistical
process control methods, development of strategic dashboards and building capacity and
capability for quality improvement. He also serves as lead faculty for various IHI initiatives
and demonstration projects in the north America, the UK, Sweden, Qatar, Denmark, New
Zealand, Australia and Africa.
Before joining the IHI, Dr. Lloyd served as the Corporate Director of Quality Resource
Services for Advocate Health Care (Oak Brook, IL). He also served as Senior Director of
Quality Measurement for Lutheran General Health System (Park Ridge, IL), directed the
American Hospital Association's Quality Measurement and Management Project (QMMP)
and served in various leadership roles at the Hospital Association of Pennsylvania. The
Pennsylvania State University awarded all three of Dr. Lloyds degrees. His doctorate is in
agricultural economics and rural sociology.
Dr. Lloyd has written many articles and chapters in books. He is also the co-author of the internationally
acclaimed book, Measuring Quality Improvement in Healthcare: A Guide to Statistical Process Control
Applications (American Society for Quality Press, 2001, 5th printing) and the author of Quality Health Care: A
Guide to Developing and Using Indicators, 2004 by Jones and Bartlett (Sudbury, MA).
Dr. Lloyd lives in Chicago with his wife Gwenn and their amusing dog Cricket. The Lloyds have a 21 year old
daughter Devon who is in her final year of university majoring in performance dance and choreography.