Florida Red Light Camera Analysis 2015

Red Light Camera
Summary Report
Leaders in Service Agents of Progress Champions for Safety
Fiscal Year 20142015

DECEMBER 31, 2015
revised 01/07/16
Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles
Introduction
Section 316.0083(4)(b), Florida Statutes, directs the Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles (department) to provide a summary report on the use and operation of traffic infraction detectors (red light cameras) in Florida. Per statute, the
department must include a review of information submitted to the department by the counties and municipalities and must
describe the enhancement of the traffic safety and enforcement programs.
Section 316.0083, Florida Statutes, describes the process for violations of traffic infraction detectors. A traffic infraction
enforcement officer issues a Notice of Violation (NOV) to the violator within 30 days of a violation. The violator may pay the
notice or contest the violation through an appeals process within 60 days. If the violator fails to pay or appeal the notice, a
traffic infraction enforcement officer issues a Uniform Traffic Citation (UTC) to the violator, with a copy to the Clerk of Court for
adjudication.
Part one of the report summarizes red light camera programs that were operational during Fiscal Year (FY) 2014-2015. Part
two includes the departments analysis of crashes that occurred at red light camera intersections.
Part 1
Survey Methodology
The department created an online survey to gather information and data from counties and municipalities (jurisdictions)
responsible for the administration of red light camera programs during FY 2014-2015. The 26 question survey included topics
such as procedures, NOVs and program size, and covered activity that occurred from July 1, 2014 to June 30, 2015. As there is
no statewide oversight of red light camera programs, the department does not have a definitive number of red light cameras
in operation, nor the location of such cameras. Therefore, jurisdictions were also asked to complete a spreadsheet regarding
camera and intersection locations, along with dates of operation. With this self-reported information, the department was
able to independently analyze crash data.
Surveys were distributed to all jurisdictions that responded to previous red light camera surveys, and to those who remitted
red light camera monies to the Department of Revenue (DOR) during the reporting period. In addition, the Florida Sheriffs
Association, the Florida Police Chiefs Association, the Florida League of Cities and the Florida Association of Counties aided in
distributing surveys to their members.
The deadline for survey responses was October 1, 2015. Actions that jurisdictions may have taken related to their program
after that date are not reflected in this report.
Summary of Survey Responses

In total, 71 jurisdictions responded that red light cameras were operational during the outlined reporting period (July 1, 2014
June 30, 2015). Of the jurisdictions that remitted monies to the DOR during the reporting period, Bal Harbour Village and
Florida City were the only jurisdictions that did not respond to the departments survey.
Nine (12.7%) jurisdictions reported an increase in the number of red light cameras in operation, 22 (31.0%) reported a decrease and 40 (56.3%) reported no change. Similarly, six (8.5%) jurisdictions reported an increase in the number of intersections with an operational red light camera, 20 (28.2%) reported a decrease and 45 (63.4%) reported no change. Further, 53
jurisdictions reported that they are continuing their red light camera program in FY 2015-2016.
Enforcement
Jurisdictions indicated:
963,039 NOVs issued1
o 630,365 (65.4%) paid fine
o 14,814 (1.5%) contested and dismissed
3,036 vehicle registration holds requested by jurisdictions
3,438 persons were issued multiple red light camera violations
1
Some jurisdictions reported that they were not able to track the status of NOVs, therefore actual numbers may vary.
Red Light Camera Summary Report: Fiscal Year 2014 - 2015

(Figure 1)
Light
Camera Violations
Violations byby
Fiscal
Year
RedRed
Light
Camera
Fiscal
Year
1,094,106
1,000,000
1,000,000
999,929
999,929
1,094,106
940,814
940,814
963,039
963,039
59,672
59,384
57,546
200,000
200,000
180,000
180,000
160,000
160,000
140,000
140,000
120,000
120,000
100,000
100,000
80,000
80,000
60,000
60,000
40,000
40,000
800,000
800,000
600,000
600,000
81,326
80,832
66,196
65,813
400,000
400,000
200,000
200,000
0
28,701
20,000
20,000
FY 2011-2012
FY 2011-2012
FY 2012-2013
FY 2012-2013
Notices of Violation
FY 2013-2014
FY 2013-2014
In-Person Citations
In-Person Citations
FY 2014-2015
FY 2014-2015
Figure 1 shows the number of NOVs issued for red light camera violations over the past four years. The graph also depicts
the number of citations issued in person by law enforcement. The number of NOVs issued for red light camera violations has
remained relatively steady, decreasing approximately four percent from FY 2011-2012 to FY 2014-2015. Over the same time
period, the number of in-person UTCs issued for running a red light has decreased (approximately 30% reduction). The department must rely on self-reported information for the number of NOVs issued each year, but in-person citations are tracked
through the Clerk of the Court System (UTC numbers reflect data submitted to the department as of 12/31/2015).
(Figure 2)
Unpaid Red
Light
Violations
UTC
Unpaid
Red Camera
Light Camera
Violations Issued
Issued asas
UTC
Unpaid Red Light Camera Violations Issued as UTC
400,000
356,524
400,000
350,000
300,000
300,000
295,175
300,224
290,535
250,000
200,000
200,000
150,000
100,000
100,000
50,000
0
FY 2011-2012
FY 2011-2012
FY 2012-2013
FY 2012-2013
FY 2013-2014
FY 2013-2014
FY 2014-2015
FY 2014-2015
Figure 2 shows the number of unpaid red light camera violations that resulted in a UTC being assessed.
Personnel
Jurisdictions were asked who reviews the camera images before issuing NOVs, who reviews contested NOVs and who ultimately issues UTCs. Options included law enforcement officer, non-sworn government employee, non-sworn contractor
employee and other. The below table reflects jurisdiction responses.
(Table 1)
Personnel
Review Camera Images

Review Contested
Issue Uniform
Traffic Citations
Law Enforcement Officer
62
56
57
Non-sworn Government Employee
23
24
21
Non-sworn Contractor Employee
16
Other (see Appendix D)
11
Jurisdictions could select multiple options for each question so numbers do not sum to the total number of respondents.
Right-Hand Turns
Pursuant to section 316.0083, Florida Statutes:

A Notice of Violation and a traffic citation may not be issued for failure to stop at a red light if the driver is making a
right-hand turn in a careful and prudent manner at an intersection where right-hand turns are permissible.
A Notice of Violation and Uniform Traffic Citation may not be issued under this section if the driver of the vehicle came
to a complete stop after crossing the stop line and before turning right if permissible at a red light, but failed to stop before crossing over the stop line or other point at which a stop is required.
(Figure 3)
Issue Violations for Right-Hand Turn
Figure 3
Issue Violations
for
Right-Hand Turn
The terms in this section of statute are left to the interpretation of each respective
jurisdiction (see Appendix C for definitions provided to the department). For FY
2014-2015, 68 percent of responding jurisdictions issued NOVs for persons making
right turns on red signals. Jurisdictions indicated that 253,744 (26.34%) NOVs were
issued for right-hand turns during the reporting period (July 1, 2014 June 30,
2015). This was the first year the department has collected these numbers.

No
32%
Alternative Safety Measures
Yes
68%
The department also inquired on what other actions jurisdictions had taken to
improve safety measures at intersections during the reporting period. A majority of
jurisdictions indicated that they had implemented at least one action. The results
of this question are shown in Figure 4 (see Appendix D for other responses).
(Figure 4)

21
Increased Signage
21
11
Increased Signage
11
Restriping
15
Restriping
19
19
15
14
Engineering
12
Engineering
14
12
Lighting
Lighting
Intelligent Transportation System
11
Intelligent Transportation System
0
0
5
5
With Red-Light Camera
With Red Light Camera

With Red-Light Camera
10
10
15
15
Without Red-Light Camera
20
20
Without Red Light Camera
Without Red-Light Camera
Part 2
Crash Analysis
Jurisdictions self-reported crash information for the past three red light camera reports. This year, however, the camera and
intersection information provided by the jurisdictions allowed the department to independently analyze crashes using the
official crash database. Intersections were only included in the analysis if at least one camera was active for at least one year,
and the camera was activated between January 1, 2012 and September 30, 2014. These criteria were chosen because the
current crash report form was implemented in 2011, and these dates allow at least one year comparison before and after the
activation of the camera. Table 2 shows the breakdown of crashes that occurred before and after the activation of red light
cameras at intersections included in the analysis. Reference Appendix A and B for a breakdown of crashes by reporting jurisdiction.
(Table 2)

Total Crashes
Angle Crashes
Rear-End Crashes
Non-Incapacitating Injuries
Incapacitating Injuries
Fatalities
Crashes involving Non-Motorists
Fatal Crashes Involving Non-Motorists
Before RLC Installed After RLC Installed

3,453
3,959
815
814
835
920
495
506
174
225
16
18
185
216
4
7
Percent Change
14.65%
-0.12%
10.18%
2.22%
29.31%
16.75%
See Appendix C for definitions
The change in number of crashes noted in the analysis follows the statewide trend during the period of this analysis (approximately 50% increase statewide, 2011-2014). Two possible factors that could have contributed to the change in crash numbers
are the increase in vehicle miles traveled (VMT) and the increase in crash reports with accurate location information (latitude
and longitude). The probability of a crash occurring increases as people drive more, and daily VMT in Florida increased 4.7
percent from 2011 to 2014. The second factor is attributed to the reliance on location data for this analysis. In order to analyze
crashes that occurred at certain intersections, it is necessary to know both the location of the intersection and the location of
crashes. Intersection locations (latitude and longitude) were submitted along with the survey, however latitude and longitude are not attached to every crash report. The percentage of crash reports with location information has increased statewide 6.85 percent from 2011 to 2015, so it is possible that a higher percentage of crashes were analyzed in the after window
than in the before window. The crash analysis should be put into context of the overall complexity of the issue at hand, as
other factors may contribute to the change in number of crashes outlined in this report.
Recommendations
The following recommendations would allow for accurate reporting of information that cannot currently be tracked through
existing systems.
1. Require jurisdictions to track camera information including location (GPS coordinates) and dates of operation.
2. Require jurisdictions to track the issuance of NOVs, including the status of those violations (paid, contested, issued
as UTC).
3. Require jurisdictions to track the issuance of NOVs for right-hand turns.
4. Require jurisdictions to report safety countermeasures taken prior to and after the installation of red light cameras
(examples: infrastructure changes, type and layout of signage, pedestrian cross walks, bike lanes, intelligent transportation systems [ITS]).
5. In accordance with statute, the department will continue to review and report on the status and trends of the use and
operation of red light cameras. In order to determine the enhancement of traffic safety, the department recommends a
more thorough analysis be conducted by an independent organization using appropriate local and state agency resources.
4
3
6
4
7
1
2
4
2
1
14
23
5
1
6
2
50
1
5
5
2
4
26
5
11
6
5
24
4
8
7
1
8
8
1
5
5
276
Apopka
Aventura
Boca Raton
Boynton Beach
Brooksville
Campbellton
Clearwater
Clermont
Clewiston
Davie
Ft. Lauderdale
Jacksonville
Lakeland
Maitland
Manatee County
Medley
Miami
Miami Springs
New Port Richey
North Miami Beach
Ocoee
Oldsmar
Orange County
Orlando
Osceola County
Palatka
Palm Beach County
Palm Coast
Pinecrest
Sarasota
Sunrise
Tallahassee
Tamarac
Tampa
West Miami
West Palm Beach
West Park
Grand Total
16
76
11
16
35
2
23
38
0
28
74
669
33
10
100
10
737
4
39
62
28
38
421
75
118
24
59
83
42
162
48
13
100
99
1
119
40
3,453
Total
Before
27
62
30
49
17
1
31
35
1
10
80
684
50
1
109
6
878
4
58
103
22
44
431
128
147
24
71
178
40
194
89
19
147
149
9
0
31
3,959
Total
After
# Intersections
Analyzed
Reporting
Jurisdiction
68.75%
-18.42%
172.73%
206.25%
-51.43%
-50.00%
34.78%
-7.89%
---64.29%
8.11%
2.24%
51.52%
-90.00%
9.00%
-40.00%
19.13%
0.00%
48.72%
66.13%
-21.43%
15.79%
2.38%
70.67%
24.58%
0.00%
20.34%
114.46%
-4.76%
19.75%
85.42%
46.15%
47.00%
50.51%
800.00%
-100.00%
-22.50%
14.65%
Total %
Change
5
6
2
1
6
1
6
9
0
6
17
143
7
0
32
0
110
2
11
17
11
10
165
8
42
9
11
27
8
42
22
1
12
12
0
42
12
815
Angle
Before
1
6
4
0
1
0
8
2
0
2
11
194
27
0
31
1
72
2
8
22
1
2
169
22
48
5
10
31
6
38
42
0
14
29
1
0
4
814
Angle
After
-80.00%
0.00%
100.00%
-100.00%
-83.33%
-100.00%
33.33%
-77.78%
---66.67%
-35.29%
35.66%
285.71%
---3.13%
---34.55%
0.00%
-27.27%
29.41%
-90.91%
-80.00%
2.42%
175.00%
14.29%
-44.44%
-9.09%
14.81%
-25.00%
-9.52%
90.91%
-100.00%
16.67%
141.67%
---100.00%
-66.67%
-0.12%
Angle %
Change
5
7
1
0
11
1
6
9
0
5
11
258
7
0
44
3
87
0
11
9
2
8
127
17
46
4
17
27
6
34
6
4
12
17
1
26
6
835
Rear-End
Before
Appendix A: Crashes Before

and After Red Light Camera Implementation by Jurisdiction
Appendix A: Crashes Before and After Red Light Camera Implementation by Jurisdiction
14
5
11
1
6
1
3
4
1
3
11
277
10
0
49
0
49
0
16
22
3
5
135
36
47
6
28
49
4
60
11
5
13
26
2
0
7
920
Rear-End
After
8 | P a g e
180.00%
-28.57%
1000.00%
---45.45%
0.00%
-50.00%
-55.56%
---40.00%
0.00%
7.36%
42.86%
--11.36%
-100.00%
-43.68%
--45.45%
144.44%
50.00%
-37.50%
6.30%
111.76%
2.17%
50.00%
64.71%
81.48%
-33.33%
76.47%
83.33%
25.00%
8.33%
52.94%
100.00%
-100.00%
16.67%
10.18%
Rear-End %
Change
4
3
6
4
7
1
2
4
2
1
14
23
5
1
6
2
50
1
5
5
2
4
26
5
11
6
5
24
4
8
7
1
8
8
1
5
5
276
Apopka
Aventura
Boca Raton
Boynton Beach
Brooksville
Campbellton
Clearwater
Clermont
Clewiston
Davie
Ft. Lauderdale
Jacksonville
Lakeland
Maitland
Manatee County
Medley
Miami
Miami Springs
New Port Richey
North Miami Beach
Ocoee
Oldsmar
Orange County
Orlando
Osceola County
Palatka
Palm Beach County
Palm Coast
Pinecrest
Sarasota
Sunrise
Tallahassee
Tamarac
Tampa
West Miami
West Palm Beach
West Park
Grand Total
4
18
1
5
2
0
5
7
0
5
16
74
8
0
11
0
50
1
13
16
7
3
59
10
15
8
14
19
3
39
12
5
15
24
0
18
8
495
NonIncapacitating
Injuries Before
5
14
9
12
0
0
6
6
0
2
6
73
14
0
10
1
66
1
11
12
6
5
50
17
19
6
12
35
1
36
19
1
23
25
0
0
3
506
NonIncapacitating
Injuries After
#
Intersections
Analyzed
Reporting
Jurisdiction
NonIncapacitating
Injuries %
Change
25.00%
-22.22%
800.00%
140.00%
-100.00%
--20.00%
-14.29%
---60.00%
-62.50%
-1.35%
75.00%
---9.09%
--32.00%
0.00%
-15.38%
-25.00%
-14.29%
66.67%
-15.25%
70.00%
26.67%
-25.00%
-14.29%
84.21%
-66.67%
-7.69%
58.33%
-80.00%
53.33%
4.17%
---100.00%
-62.50%
2.22%
0
6
0
0
3
0
2
2
0
1
5
22
2
0
10
0
16
0
1
1
1
8
38
3
10
0
4
12
0
5
4
0
3
6
0
7
2
174
Incapacitating
Injuries Before
1
4
3
0
0
0
3
3
0
2
3
21
4
0
16
0
22
0
4
2
0
1
72
1
22
1
1
17
0
7
7
0
1
7
0
0
0
225
Incapacitating
Injuries After
Appendix
A: Crashes Before and After Red Light Camera Implementation by Jurisdiction

---33.33%
-----100.00%
--50.00%
50.00%
--100.00%
-40.00%
-4.55%
100.00%
--60.00%
--37.50%
--300.00%
100.00%
-100.00%
-87.50%
89.47%
-66.67%
120.00%
---75.00%
41.67%
--40.00%
75.00%
---66.67%
16.67%
---100.00%
-100.00%
29.31%
Incapacitating
Injuries %
Change
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
2
0
0
1
1
4
0
1
1
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
2
0
0
0
18
Fatalities
After
9 | P a g e
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
4
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
1
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
2
1
16
Fatalities
Before
# Intersections
Analyzed
Before
Apopka
4
1
Aventura
3
2
Boca Raton
6
1
Boynton Beach
4
0
Brooksville
7
1
Clearwater
2
3
Clermont
4
0
Davie
1
1
Ft. Lauderdale
14
7
Jacksonville
23
18
Lakeland
5
1
Manatee County
6
2
Medley
2
1
Miami
50
45
New Port Richey
5
1
North Miami Beach
5
4
Ocoee
2
3
Oldsmar
4
4
Orange County
26
23
Orlando
5
6
Osceola County
11
1
Palatka
6
4
Palm Beach County
5
4
Palm Coast
24
5
Pinecrest
4
2
Sarasota
8
25
Sunrise
7
7
Tallahassee
1
0
Tamarac
8
3
Tampa
8
9
West Palm Beach
5
1
West Park
5
0
Grand Total
270
185
Table does not include jurisdictions with no crashes involving Non-Motorists
Reporting Jurisdiction
After
1
0
3
5
0
5
2
1
8
24
1
3
0
37
1
4
2
2
29
14
6
1
3
16
0
15
12
0
10
8
1
2
216
Change
0
-2
2
5
-1
2
2
0
1
6
0
1
-1
-8
0
0
-1
-2
6
8
5
-3
-1
11
-2
-10
5
0
7
-1
0
2
31
# Crashes Involving Non-Motorist (Pedestrians and Bicyclist) at Red Light Camera Intersections
10 | P a g e
Appendix
B: Crashes
CrashesInvolving
Involving
Non-Motorists
andRed
After
Red
LightImplementation
Camera Implementation
Appendix B:
Non-Motorists
BeforeBefore
and After
Light
Camera
11 | P a g e
ansportation Act, Section 1401(a) PROHIBITION.Except as provided in subsection (b), for fiscal years 2016 through 2020, funds apportioned to a State under section 104(b)(3) of title 23,
used to purchase, operate, or maintain an automated traffic enforcement system.
A crash where two vehicles impact at an angle. For example, the

left front of one vehicle impacts the side of another vehicle.
Rear-End Crash
A crash where the front of one vehicle impacts the back of another
vehicle.
Non-incapacitating injury Any visible injuries such as bruises, abrasions, limping, etc.
Incapacitating injury
Any visible signs of injury from a crash or person(s) who had to be
carried from the scene.
Fatal Injury
Any injury that results in death within a 30 day period after the
crash occurred.
Non-Motorist
Any person other than an occupant of a motor vehicle in transport.
This includes pedestrians, occupants of other motor vehicles not in
transport and occupants of transport vehicles other than motor
vehicles.
Angle Crash
Appendix C: Glossary of Terms

Appendix D: Glossary of Terms
Department
of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles
Appendix C: JurisdictionFlorida
Responses
to Survey
Administration
Transportation
City of Sweetwater
Public Works
CIty of South Pasadena
City of St. Petersburg

City of Sweetwater
City of Tallahassee
West Miami Police Dept.

West Palm Beach Police Department
City of West Park
Tampa Police Department
Broward Sheriff's Office
City of Tallahassee

SPD
City of South Pasadena
Sarasota Police
Port Richey Police Department
City of Orlando/Code Enforcement
City of Oldsmar
New Port Richey Police Department

North Miami Beach Police Department
Miami Gardens Police Department
City of Miami
Kissimmee Police Department

Margate Police Department
Homestead Police Dept
Hollywood Police Department
Hallandale Beach Police Dept.

Holly Hill Police Department
Haines City Police Department
Gulfport Police Department
City of Doral Police Department

City of Groveland
Gulf Breeze Police Department
Cocoa Beach Police Department
Clewiston Police Department
Bradenton Police Dept.

Clearwater Police Department
Boynton Beach Police Dept.
City of Aventura
Apopka Police Department
Boca Raton Police

Brooksville Police Department
Town of Campbellton
Agency
sbelfiore@cityofwinterpark.org/
slocke@cityofwinterpark.org
ChiefAndreu@WestMiamiPolice.org
CRobinson@WPB.Org
Jwilson@Cityofwestpark.org
paul.smalley@tampagov.net
Barry_Berhow@sheriff.org
allen.secreast@talgov.com
evan.mory@stpete.org
Slopez@cityofsweetwater.fl.gov
clewis@mysouthpasadena.com
bryan.graham@sarasotagov.com
r.runge@cityofportrichey.com
kory.keith@cityoforlando.net
abraithwaite@myoldsmar.com
bogartk@cityofnewportrichey.org
Tiffany.Argueta-Cruz@nmbpd.org
william.bamford@mgpdfl.org
michael.vega@miami-police.org
jloughli@kissimmee.org
esuarez@margatefl.com
tsurman@homesteadpolice.com
shightower@hollywoodfl.org
mmartinez@cohb.org
saldrich@hollyhillfl.org
tglover@hainescitypd.com
rvincent@mygulfport.us
Cathy.Jewett@Doralpd.com
scott.penvosegroveland-fl.gov
rrandle@gulfbreezefl.gov
jtaylor@cityofcocoabeach.com
mcneald@flcjn.net
phil.waller@cityofbradenton.com
michael.walek@myclearwater.com
petrielloa@bbfl.us
carrj@cityofaventura.com
swbrick@apopka.net
pbuhr@myboca.us
rhankins@cityofbrooksville.us
tc32426@bellsouth.net
Email Address
Provide the contact information of the person completing the survey
Samuel Belfiore/SGT Stan Locke City of Winter Park Police Dept.
Nelson Andreu
Chris Robinson
John Wilson
Corporal Paul Smalley
Barry A Berhow
Allen Secreast
Evan Mory
Steven Lopez
Carley Lewis
Bryan Graham
Ryan Runge
Kory Keith
Alan Braithwaite
Kim Bogart
Tiffany Argueta-Cruz
William Bamford
Sgt. Jim Loughlin

Sergeant Efrain Suarez
Special Operations
Sarasota Police Department
City of Sarasota
City of Winter Park
Police Department
City of Port Richey
Police Dept.
Police Department/Traffic Division
Public Works
Code Enforcement
City of Orlando
City of West Miami

City of West Palm Beach
City of West Park
Administrative Services
City of Oldsmar
Broward Sheriff's Office - Traffic Unit
Police Department
Police Department
City of New Port Richey

City of North Miami Beach
Tampa Police Department
Police Department
City of Miami Gardens
City of Tamarac
Administration Division / Red Light Camera Enforcement Detail

Ofc. Michael Vega
City of Miami
City of Tampa
Kissimmee Police Department

Poice Department - Traffic Unit
City of Kissimmee
City of Margate
Lieutenant Selina Hightower

Lt. Thomas Surman
Hollywood Police Department
Police Department
City of Homestead
Miguel Martinez
Stephen K. Aldrich
Tim Glover
Jeff Taylor
Debbie McNeil
Sgt. Phillip E. Waller

Lt. Michael Walek
CSO A Petriello #072
Joanne Carr
City of Hollywood
Police
Police Department
Administrative Division
Police
Police Department

City of Groveland
City of Gulf Breeze
City of Hallandale Beach

City of Holly Hill
Robert Vincent
Police Department
City of Cocoa Beach
Police Department
Clewiston Police Department
City of Clewiston
Police Department
Bradenton Police Department

Patrol/Special Operations/Traffic
City of Bradenton
City of Clearwater
City of Gulfport
Boynton Beach Police Dept. - Traffic Unit
City of Boynton Beach
City Of Haines City, Polk County
Police Sergeant Cathy Jewett

Commander George Penvose II
Chief Robert Randle
Community Development, Code Compliance Division
Lt. Stephan Brick
Police
City of Aventura
Name
Peter Buhr
Rick Hankins
Edward L. Britt
City of Apopka
Open-Ended Response
Police Services
Red Light Camera Division
Public Safety-Law Enforcement
Open-Ended Response
Boca Raton
Campbellton
What Department oversees the red-light camera

program?
Name of jurisdiction (City or County)
Appendix D: Jurisdiction Responses to Survey
407-643-1652/407-599-35123
3052660530
561-822-1636
954 931-2149
813-348-2035
954-720-2225 ext 76002
850-891-8273
727-551-3322
305 924 4405
727-347-4171
941.954.7022
7278350974
407.246.3479
813-749-1107
727-841-4550
(305) 949-5500 ext. 2844
304.474.1391
(305) 603-6710
407-847-0176 *3257
954-970-8186
305-224-5411
(954) 967-4371
954-457-1490
386-248-9494
863-421-3636 ext 2267
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
786-845-4600
352-429-4166
850-934-5121
727-893-1049
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Response
321-868-3251
(863) 983-1474 ext 212
941-932-9300x318
727-562-4119
561-742-6119
305 466 8940
407-703-1757
561-620-6059
352-540-3800
(850) 263-4535
Phone Number
Has your jurisdiction operated red-

light cameras within the reporting
period (July 1, 2014 - June 30, 2015)?
6
38
6
50
15
19
22
7
22
26 cameras
9
5
28
143
16
4
17
3
8
13
11
2
6
7
3
15
12
22
12
16
2
Open-Ended Response
As of July 1, 2014, how many red-

light cameras were operational?
6
0
5
54
15
19
0
8
23
30 cameras
9
5
28
136
16
0
0
0
13
0
2
6
7
3
12
21
0
16
2
Open-Ended Response
As of June 30, 2015, how

many red-light cameras
were operational?
10
2
4
9
2
92
15
6
5
13 intersections

City of Holly Hill
City of Hollywood
City of Homestead
City of Kissimmee
City of Margate
City of Miami

City of Oldsmar
City of Orlando
5
38
5
City of Tampa
City of West Miami

City of West Park
City of Winter Park
5
0
4
21
0
6
10
14 intersections
6
5
15
92
9
0
0
0
0
2
3
7
2
10
0
7
1
12803
14909
8394
2116
48450
18126
8118
3511
24922
4545
23105
4069
21093
1077
9686
8631
76101
131674
16081
1906
7404
12438
1092
1219
8937
5350
1
1491
6575
7066
1974
7375
8992
14072
31574
30539
1764
13916
1286
Total #
8397
4884
4451
968
30443
10522
5538
3581
15412
3253
17500
2700
14003
811
6507
4917
63769
83283
12010
905
5060
8459
596
923
6394
3340
1
1025
5176
5538
1413
5388
6144
7737
18795
17925
1177
8810
1029
# Paid
999999
47
0
56
20
0
3
99999
2
0
2259
65
50
0
105
0
0
72
1
0
0
3
19
866
0
7
0
141
289
0
999999
999999
726
37
29
0
148
99999
243
54
81
41
169
127
3599
1133
104
0
206
226
74
30
50
84
1
6
8
215
35
25
76
341
620
33
46
11
138
361
0
233
21
0
305
99999
35
17
7916
307
70
5
12
33
16
30
22
1
7
0
54
7
713
21
20
9
13
2
1110
2179
329
1045
13861
3420
2042
2395
2777
952
4445
896
5421
1676
2686
12333
30998
3534
389
495
3615
428
470
2058
1835
3790
466
1261
2061
419
1424
1943
3458
7557
7586
528
4478
162
# Contested & # Contested & # Contested & # Issued as

pending
dismissed
upheld
UTC
536
0
0
0
1176
120
0
20
99999
13
0
0
2500
313
0
24
0
0
1
0
0
47
1
1903
99999
50
0
0
0
# Pending
issuance as
UTC
None
0
0
0
82
72
We do not do registration holds.
21
N/A
0
0
681
492
0
0
0
None
0
0
0
None
3
0
approx 48 have been requested and pending
0
76
0
Open-Ended Response
Electronically
Electronically
Electronically
Electronically
Electronically
Electronically
Electronically
Electronically
Paper
Electronically
Electronically
Electronically
Electronically
Electronically
Both
Electronically
Electronically
Both
Electronically
Electronically
Paper
Electronically
Electronically
Electronically
Both
Electronically
Electronically
Electronically
Both
Electronically
Electronically
Electronically
Electronically
Electronically
Electronically
Electronically
Electronically
Electronically
Paper
Response
493
731
329
48
3009
681
Not tracked
information not available

1231
154
1285
88 plates where repeats or 2% of the violations
493
20
402
200
5991
10,175 @ 2 / 2,066 @ 3 or more
760
1902
373
81
1055
28
268
286
0
35
Unable to obtain data
344
Unknown
1
191
812
2588
1191
38
1039
21
Open-Ended Response
How many registration holds did your jurisdiction request as a How does your jurisdiction In order to identify the number of repeat offenders, please provide
Please provide the following information regarding Notices of Violation issued for red-light camera
result of red-light camera violations during the reporting period submit crash data to the the number of distinct vehicle owners issued Notices of Violation for
violations in your jurisdiction between July 1, 2014 and June 30, 2015.
(July 1, 2014 - June 30, 2015)?
multiple red-light camera violations.
Department?
20
City of Tamarac
City of Tallahassee
City of Gulfport
10
6
3
2
3

City of Groveland
City of Gulf Breeze

City of Sweetwater
City of Cocoa Beach
City of Clewiston
10
7
2
City of Bradenton
City of Clearwater
City of Sarasota
City of Aventura
10
City of Apopka
City of Port Richey
6
7
1
Open-Ended Response
Open-Ended
Response
Open-Ended Response
Boca Raton
Campbellton
As of June 30, 2015, at

how many were red-
light cameras
operational?
As of July 1, 2014, at
how many were red-
light cameras
operational?
11
Somewhat Important
Somewhat Important
Somewhat Important
Not Important
Very Important
Not Important
Very Important

City of Holly Hill
City of Hollywood
City of Homestead
City of Kissimmee
City of Margate
City of Miami
Very Important
Somewhat Important
Somewhat Important
Somewhat Important
Somewhat Important
Very Important
Somewhat Important
Somewhat Important
N/A
Somewhat Important
Very Important
Somewhat Important
Very Important
Not Important
Very Important
Very Important
Very Important
Somewhat Important
Very Important
Somewhat Important
Very Important
N/A
Somewhat Important
Somewhat Important
Somewhat Important
Very Important
Very Important
Very Important
Very Important
Very Important
Very Important
Somewhat Important
Somewhat Important
Very Important
Somewhat Important
Somewhat Important
Somewhat Important
Somewhat Important
Very Important
Very Important
Citizen complaints
Very Important
Very Important
Somewhat Important
Somewhat Important
Very Important
Somewhat Important
Very Important
N/A
Very Important
N/A
Somewhat Important
Very Important
Not Important
Very Important
Very Important
Very Important
Somewhat Important
Somewhat Important
Somewhat Important
Somewhat Important
N/A
Very Important
Somewhat Important
Very Important
Very Important
Somewhat Important
Very Important
Very Important
Very Important
Very Important
Somewhat Important
Somewhat Important
Very Important
Somewhat Important
Somewhat Important
Somewhat Important
Somewhat Important
Very Important
Somewhat Important

observations
Very Important
Somewhat Important
Very Important
Very Important
Somewhat Important
Somewhat Important
Somewhat Important
N/A
Very Important
Very Important
N/A
Very Important
Not Important
Very Important
Very Important
Very Important
Very Important
Not Important
Very Important
Somewhat Important
Very Important
Not Important
Very Important
Very Important
Very Important
Somewhat Important
Very Important
Very Important
Very Important
Somewhat Important
Somewhat Important
Not Important
Somewhat Important
Somewhat Important
Very Important
Very Important
Somewhat Important
Very Important
Very Important
Traffic Volume
City of Winter Park
Very Important
Very Important
Somewhat Important
Very Important
City of Tampa
City of West Miami

City of West Park
Somewhat Important
City of Tamarac
Very Important
City of Tallahassee
Very Important
N/A
Somewhat Important
Very Important
City of Sarasota

City of Sweetwater
Very Important
Somewhat Important
City of Orlando
City of Port Richey
Very Important
City of Oldsmar
Somewhat Important
Somewhat Important
Somewhat Important

Somewhat Important
City of Gulfport
Somewhat Important
Very Important
Not Important
Somewhat Important
Somewhat Important

City of Groveland
City of Gulf Breeze
Very Important
City of Clewiston
City of Cocoa Beach
Very Important
Somewhat Important
City of Bradenton
City of Clearwater
Very Important
Somewhat Important
City of Aventura
Very Important
Very Important
Very Important
Somewhat Important
Traffic citation data
Very Important
Very Important
Very Important
Very Important
Very Important
Very Important
Very Important
N/A
Very Important
Very Important
Somewhat Important
Very Important
Somewhat Important
Very Important
Very Important
Very Important
Very Important
Very Important
Somewhat Important
Very Important
Somewhat Important
Very Important
Very Important
Very Important
Very Important
Somewhat Important
Very Important
Very Important
Very Important
Very Important
Somewhat Important
Very Important
Very Important
Very Important
Very Important
Very Important
Very Important
Very Important
Very Important
Pedestrian safety
Please see attached "Question

13"
Serverity of crash data
Traffic Crash Data
same intersections since 2009

not a part of original selection
changing driving behavior
Other (please specify)
Other than traffic crashes, please rank the following factors on importance when selecting which intersections to install red-light cameras.
City of Apopka
Boca Raton
Campbellton
Open-Ended Response
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Response
Did you relocate any existing

red-light cameras during the
reporting period?
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Change in number
of crashes
X
X
Change in pedestrian
safety
Change
in revenue
Decrease in the number of violations
Change in number of red light violations
Please see attached "Question 15"
Change in number of violations issued
Drop in number of violations
N/A - we haven't moved any.
Reduction in number of violations
reduction of violations
Reduction in Notices issued and change

in driving behavior
Reduced number of violations
Number of Violations
Reduction in the number of NOVs issued

as a % of traffic volume.
What factors are used to determine the success/failure of each camera location?
12
X
X
X
X
X

City of Groveland
City of Gulf Breeze
City of Gulfport

City of Holly Hill
City of Hollywood

City of Sweetwater
City of Tallahassee
City of Tamarac
City of Winter Park
Traffic Hearing Magistrate
Local Hearing Officer per

State Statute
X
X
City of West Miami

City of West Park
City of Sarasota
City of Tampa
City of Port Richey
Hearing Officer
City of Orlando
Special Magistrate
City of Oldsmar
X
X

City of Miami
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Non-sworn government
employee
Non-sworn contractor
employee
Vendor who processes the NOVs.
Traffic Infraction Enforcement Officers
American Traffic Solutions (ATS)--Printed &

mailed by ATS
Contractor via request from LEO.
Mailed out by an automated system
Who issues Uniform Traffic Citations if Notices of Violation are unpaid? (select all that apply)
Law Enforcement
Officer
City of Kissimmee
City of Margate
Special Magistrate
contracted by the City
City of Cocoa Beach
City of Clewiston
Hearing Officer
X
X
City of Bradenton
City of Clearwater
City of Homestead
Hearing Officer and Clerk

during the Hearings
City of Aventura
employee
City of Apopka
employee
X
X
X
Law Enforcement
Officer
Who reviews contested Notices of Violation? (select all that apply)
Boca Raton
Campbellton
Open-Ended Response
13
Yes
Yes
No
X
X
X
X
City of Gulfport

City of Holly Hill
City of Hollywood
City of Homestead
City of Kissimmee
City of Margate
City of Miami

City of Oldsmar
X
X
City of Port Richey
City of Sarasota

City of Sweetwater
City of Tallahassee
City of Tamarac
City of Tampa
City of West Miami

City of West Park
City of Winter Park
City of Orlando
Yes
Yes
No
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
Yes
Yes
No
No
X
X
Traffic Infraction Enforcement

officers
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
American Traffic Solutions (ATS)

does initial review; Agency validates
X
X
X

City of Groveland
City of Gulf Breeze
Only issued if approved by Law

Enforcement
City of Cocoa Beach
City of Clewiston
X
X
City of Bradenton
City of Clearwater
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Response
City of Aventura
employee
City of Apopka
employee
Not Complied
9345
6845
11954
Not tracked
1206
20478
158
7623
55
2033
62659
3350
4272
3676
1127
713
45
1271
4666 (estimated)
23816
13280
536
No method exists or collecting this data
27
Open-Ended Response
Do you issue Notices of Violation

How many Notices of Violation were issued
(through red-light camera detection) for for right turns on red during the reporting
persons making right turns on red
period? (July 1, 2014 - June 30, 2015)
signals?
X
X
X
Law Enforcement
Officer
Who reviews the camera images before Notices of Violation are issued? (select all that apply)
Boca Raton
Campbellton
Open-Ended Response
14
City of Winter Park
City of West Miami

City of West Park
City of Tampa
You can make a turn in a "careful and prudent manner" after coming to a complete stop pursuant to the directives of Florida
Statute 316.075. However, our officers use their discretion when reviewing the violations and do not issue violations to
anyone going under 12 MPH during a right turn unless aggravating circumstances exists.
Does not apply to City of Tamarac. Right turns on red are only enforced at the location which is posted "No Turn On Red"
Where the violators vehicle making the right on red against a solid red light does not interfere with oncoming traffic and/or
pedestrians so as to constitute a hazard.
If the reviewing officer were standing at the intersection and observed the violation, would he/she issue the driver a regular
written UTC? If so, then it is also a Red Light Camera violation.
City of Tamarac
City of Tallahassee
See attached "Question 21"

the statute also reads "but failed to stop before crossing over the stop line or other point at which a stop is required"
As a general guide, the Tallahassee Police Department uses the term "careful & prudent manner" as not negatively
effecting pedestrians and other vehicles.
Only Posted Intersections Per the Hearing Officer: as long as the right turn does not violate the right of way of other vehicle
or pedestrian traffic.
This is determined by the law enforcement officer who issues the violations and by the Special Magistrate who presides
over hearings for contested violations based on the individual circumstances.
Less than 12 mph and determination by TIEO on statute compliance.
Our traffic enforcement specialists review all potential violations where motorists cross the stop bar at 15 MPH or more.
The traffic enforcement officer considers the totality of the circumstances to determine if a violation occurred. A notice of
violations is issued when the motorist proceeds to make the turn without slowing down, or causes other motorists to brake
or take evasive action, .
Violations are issued for right turns on red whenever the driver operates a vehicle in a continual motion without regard for
oncoming, opposing or pending traffic at an intersection. The violation is also issued whenever the operator fails to slow,
stop or yield to any pedestrian, or vehicle making a U-turn at a perpendicular angle.
As it relates to right hand turn on red, the intersection must have signage stating "No turn on red" in order for a violation to
be issued.
Reviewing Officer determination, officers are instructed to only issue notices had they been present at the intersection and
would have issued a UTC for the same violation for running the red light.
We only issue right turn on red violations at one intersection. That intersection is posted no right turn on red with two signs
prohibiting the right turn. One of the two signs is electronic and lights up when the light is red.
The combination of speed, proximity of other traffic, and or proximity of pedestrians, is considered to determine whether
turn was careful and prudent.
A review is triggered if the vehicle's minimum speed at the final point of measurement before entering intersection is at
least 14 mph. At that point, the issuing officer has discretion to determine careful and prudent.
As long as it's safe and doesn't effect other vehicles traveling in that direction.
Careful and prudent manner is defined by our jurisdiction by the vehicle coming to a complete stop than proceeding as long
as the flow of traffic allows.
Taking into account the speed of the vehicle while turning, if there are pedestrians in the area, the length of time that the
light has been red.

City of Sweetwater
City of Sarasota
City of Port Richey
City of Orlando
City of Oldsmar

City of Miami
City of Kissimmee
City of Margate
City of Homestead
City of Hollywood

City of Holly Hill
City of Gulfport

City of Groveland
City of Gulf Breeze
City of Cocoa Beach
City of Clewiston
City of Bradenton
City of Clearwater
Careful and prudent manner would be coming to a complete stop, ensuring that the driver of the vehicle had enough time to
look at oncoming traffic to determine if it was clear to proceed.
vehicle stops before, at or after the stop bar before turning right at the intersection
City of Aventura
City of Apopka
The vehicle caused a potential hazard to other vehicles or pedestrians.

Violations exceeding 10 mph
When 2nd vehicle has to slow to avoid a crash with violater
Having regard for angle, width, grade, curves, corners, vehicles, pedestrians and all other attendant circumstances,
including but not limited to speed and visual obstructions, so as not to endanger the life, limb, or property of any person.
Note: Damage or injury does not have to occur in order for an event to be considered NOT careful and prudent.
Open-Ended Response
Boca Raton
Campbellton
Open-Ended Response
Statute 316.0083(1)(a), F.S., provides that "A notice of violation and a traffic citation may not be issued for failure to stop
at a red light if the driver is making a right-hand turn in a careful and prudent manner at an intersection where right-hand
turns are permissible." As this statute does not define "careful and prudent manner," please provide the definition used
by your jurisdiction when determining if a violation should be issued.
X
X
X
X
X
X
HALO technology (intelligent

Increased
collision prevention system) Restriping Engineering signage Lighting
What action(s) has your jurisdiction taken to improve safety measures as a

result of your red light camera program?
(at intersection(s) with red light cameras)

collision prevention system)
Restriping Engineering
Increased
signage
Lighting
What action(s) has your jurisdiction taken to improve safety measures as a result of
your red light camera program?
(at intersection(s) without red light cameras)
15
No
Extended the amber time 10% beyond minimum required by FDOT.
City of Cocoa Beach

City of Groveland
City of Gulf Breeze
Yes
No
not applicable
Contact FDOT to study intersections for layout and signage
City of Kissimmee
City of Margate
City of Miami
Yes
City of Winter Park
Yes
No
Yes
City of West Miami

City of West Park
None during this time frame
Yes
No
City of Tallahassee
Yes
No
Yes

City of Sweetwater
City of Tampa
Yes
City of Tamarac
Yes
City of Sarasota
Installation of reflective traffic signal back plates
Yes
Yes
No
City of Port Richey
City of Orlando
Reflective backplates on traffic signals with and without red light

cameras. LED street lighting was improved prior to red light camera
installation.
Yes
Yes

City of Oldsmar
Yes
None
Yes
none
City of Homestead
Yes
No
City of Hollywood
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No

City of Holly Hill
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Response
City of Gulfport
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
None
City of Clewiston
Yes
Yes
Yes
City of Bradenton
City of Clearwater
Officers have increased presence by patrolling more through the

intersections
Yes
City of Aventura
Yes
City of Apopka
Response
No
Yes
No
Open-Ended Response
Is your jurisdiction
Has red-light camera
continuing the red-light footage been used
camera program in Fiscal to investigate other
Year 2015-2016?
crimes?
Boca Raton
Campbellton
What action(s) has your jurisdiction taken to improve safety

measures as a result of your red light camera program?
Open-Ended Response
N/A
N/A
Numbers 16-18: non-sworn government employee is a certified traffic infraction enforcement
officer. Number 19: only at locations posted "No Turn on Red", Number 22: No data available
from Broward County Traffic Engineering stating improvements made were a result of red light
camera program.
na
n/a
N/A
None
None
Requested in forms of public record and used for in house and other agency investigations
regarding traffic and other crimes
Question 18. The footage of potential violations are forwarded to our department by a contractor
based upon specific business rules provided by our department. When the footage is received, it
is reviewed by our traffic enforcement specialist who determines if a notice of violations should
be issued.
N/A
Arem vs. City of Hollywood. Cameras operational, but Sheriff (TIEO) is not processing, citing 4th
DCA ruling. City invoking Budget Appropriations Clause in contract for FY15/16, program will
not be funded.
N/A
423 Video Requests were submited
not applicable
None
#23 Pending contract renewal after Nov 2015
N/A
n/a
Regarding question # 9, 162 cases was rescheduled. Regarding question #23, our Red Light
Camera Program is currently suspended as of March 6, 2015 and at this time it is unknown if it
will be reinstated for the Fiscal Year of 2015-2016
Criminal invest. ie.burglaries, robberies, other criminal activity and auto accidents.
None
54 videos were requested and viewed for both vehicle crashes & for criminal investigations
This includes for our City and also neighboring jurisdictions.
Crimes
HIt & Runs, stolen cars, homisides, traffic homisides
Video has been requested 8 times to assist in investigations ranging from accidents to violent crimes. N/A
104 requests have been made, 54 crash related and 46 for other investigations
Robberies, Burglaries, Hit-and-Run Traffic Crashes
traffic crash and criminal investigation
By Law Enforcement for a variety of reasons

For cases investigated by our detectives.
As requested by the Pinellas County Sheriff's Office
Requested 14 times. Used 53 times to assist official investigations

Number of videos per type of incident: 71 accident, 3 fatality, 44 investigations, 6 homicide, 17 hit &
run accident.
35 video requests related to hit and run, robbery, crash, and missing person investigations
Per vendor, footage has assisted investigations 10 times.
Hit & Runs, Traffic homicides, Homicides, Robberies, etc

The red light camera data and video footage captured by red light cameras have been instrumental in
identifying, solving and verifying criminal activities, traffic fatalities, and crash investigations. The red
light camera video footage has been shared with investigators from Miami Gardens and surrounding
jurisdictions in their quest to solve crime and provide evidence used to validate and vindicate the
During the reporting period, red-light camera footage was requested 24 times: 14 times for general
investigations, four times for traffic crash investigations and 6 times for a homicide investigation.
Since 2011, when the cameras were first installed, footage has been requested 96 times: 34 times
for general investigations, four times for robberies, seven times for homicides, eight times for hit &
runs, 28 times for traffic crashes, two times for shootings and two times for car jackings.
15
traffic homicides and hit and run investigations

Footage used to identify armed robbery vehicle
Has assisted in criminal investigations & crash investigations
Video Pull--Accident 37, Video Pull--Robbery 2, Video Pull--Police Investigation 13, Video Pull-Homicide 6, Video Pull--Accident Fatality 4, Video Pull-- Accident Hit & Run 1
During this period, 7 times. 6 for general crimes and 1 for a crash investigation.
Thefts, vehicle thefts, and domestic violence cases.
NA
q.20 additional signage has been placed at the intersections where the cameras are present
Traffic Crashes, robbery cases, shootings,theft cases and other police investigations
N/A
Please be advised we do not have complete data N/A has been provided because our cameras
have been off since 01/15
n/a
N/A
N/A
Red Light Cameras are back Online and program is moving forward.
Some information I do not have access to and have asked our vendor for information to better
answer the questions. Answers provided are to the best of my ability and may contain some
errors. Right turn on red citations include intersections where right turns on red are not
permitted and the intersections include signage.
N/A
N/A
Question 18 - only a Law Enforcement Officer makes a determination as to whether a violation
has occurred
16 None
N/A
N/A
Provide any specifications/clarifications for any of your answers.
Hit and Run Investigators have used the system to assist them with their cases.
n/a
N/A
During the reporting period, officers requested video from red light cameras 20 times for official
investigations.
Traffic Homicides, Murder Investigations, Hit & Run Crashes
Video has been sought for the use as an investigative tool on four occasions this reporting period.
Footage has been used to traffic accidents, shootings, stolen vehicles

Traffic fatalities / Burglaries / Hit and Run Crashes
Video was pulled 91 times to assist in investigations. Accidents, Robbery, Homicide
footage assisted official investigation 15 times
Robberies, burglaries, Hit and Run crashes etc.
N/A
Felony Battery Case. Video was not useful, subject vehicle not located (11/2014) JCSO J-42
Open-Ended Response
If yes, please provide additional details.
16
Community Development
Traffic Infraction Enforcement Officer

Fort Lauderdale Police Department
Green Cove Springs Police Department
Department of Patrol Services

Jacksonville Sheriff's Office
Lakeland Police Department
Operations
Building and Development Services
Traffic Unit
Police Department
Patrol
Police Department
Police
Public Works Traffic Engineering
Osceola County Sheriff's Office
Palatka Police Department

Code Enforcement Division
POLICE
Police
Police Department
Police
Police Department
Kenneth City Police Department

Police
Orange Park Police Department
POLICE DEPARTMENT
TRAFFIC UNIT
Village of Pinecrest Police Department (PD)
Cutler Bay
Edgewood Police Dept

Fort Lauderdale / Broward County
Green Cove Springs
Hillsborough County
Javksonville
Lakeland, Polk County
Maitland
Manatee County Government
Miami Beach
Miami Springs
Milton Police Dept., Milton FL
North Miami
OCoee
Orange County
Osceola County
Palatka
Palm Coast
SUNRISE
Temple Terrace
The City of Daytona Beach
Town of Davie
Town of Juno Beach
Town of Kenneth City

Town of Medley
Town Of Orange Park
TOWN OF SURFSIDE
VILLAGE OF KEY BISCAYNE

Village of Pinecrest (City)
A. PAIGO
Officer J.C. Gonzalez
JULIO TORRES
Gary Goble
Sgt. Michael Vieno

John Wilson
James Kos
John Wilson
Bob Goldberg
Bernard Seeley
SGT. STEVE CURRAN
Toby Williams
Barbara Grossman
Lt. William Wagner

Krista Barber
Joedel Zaballero
PSA Lashantavia Campbell
Lieutenant Jimmy Deal

Katherine McDaniels
Joaquin Rodriguez
Tammy Boggs
Dawn D'Ambrosio
Scott Wisneski
Corporal David Thatcher

Lt. Larry Jones
Stacey Salemi
Maggie Bain
Officer J. J. Faro, Jr.
Matthew Helman
DIANE CARTER
Sgt. Alex Escobar
KERRY DRADDY
Name
POLICE DEPARTMENT - TRAFFIC DIVISION

Coral Gables Police
CORAL SPRINGS POLICE DEPARTMENT
Open-Ended Response
Open-Ended Response
CLERMONT
Coral Gables
CORAL SPRINGS
What Department oversees the red-light camera

program?
mhelman@cutlerbay-fl.gov
DCARTER@CLERMONTFL.ORG
aescobar@coralgables.com
KAD@CORALSPRINGS.ORG
Email Address
KEY BISCAYNE
Village of Pinecrest PD
SURFSIDE POLICE
OPPD
Kenneth City Police Department

Town of Medley
Juno Beach Police Department
Davie Police Department
Temple Terrace Police
SUNRISE POLICE DEPT
Palatka Police Department

City of Palm Coast
Ocoee Police Department

OC Traffic Engineering
Osceola County Public Works Dept
North Miami
Miami Springs Police Department

Records/Milton Police Dept.
Miami Beach PD
Maitland PD
Lakeland Police Department
Hillsborough County Sheriff's Office

Jacksonville Sheriff's Office
APAIGO@KBPD.NET
jgonzalez@pinecrest-fl.gov
JTORRES@TOWNOFSURFSIDEFL.GOV
ggoble@townop.com
vienom@kennethcityfl.org
Jwilson@Medleypd.com
jkos@junobeachpd.com
John_Wilson@Davie-FL.GOV
GoldbergB@CODB.US
Bseeley@templeterrace.com
SCURRAN@SUNRISEFL.GOV
twilliams@palatka-fl.gov
bgrossman@palmcoastgov.com
wwagner@ocoee.org
krista.barber@ocfl.net
jzab@osceola.org
lcampbell@northmiamipolice.com
jdeal@mspd.us
mcdanielskk@flcjn.net
joaquinrodriguez@miamibeachfl.gov
tammy.boggs@mymanatee.org
ddambrosio@maitlandpd.org
Scott.Wisneski@lakelandgov.net
dthatche@hcso.tampa.fl.us
larry.jones@jaxsheriff.org

ssalemi@edgewood-fl.gov
FLPD
mbain@fortlauderdale.gov
Green Cove Springs Police Department JFaro@gcspd.com
Town of Cutler Bay
CLERMONT POLICE DEPARTMENT

Coral Gables PD
CORAL SPRINGS POLICE
Agency
Provide the contact information of the person completing the survey
305-365-5555
(305)234-2100 Ext. 385
305-861-4862
904-278-3006
727-498-8942
954 931-2149
561-656-0357
(954) 693-8342
386-671-8075
813-506-6506
9547463387
386-329-0115
386 986-4739
407-905-3100 ext 3319

407-836-7892
407-742-0623
305-891-0294 ext. 23208
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
(305) 888-9711
(850)983-5423
Yes
305 673 7888
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Response
Has your jurisdiction operated red-

light cameras within the reporting
period (July 1, 2014 - June 30, 2015)?
941-748-4501 x3817
407-875-2810
863-603-6649
(813)247-0985
904-630-7852
407-996-1616 X109
954-828-7305
904 297-7322
305-234-4262
352-394-5588
305-442-1600x7824
954.346.1277
Phone Number
4
None
7
4
16
12 Cameras
13
6
39
10
42
16
21
4
5
10
16
10
26
3
32
5
6
5
8
Open-Ended Response
As of July 1, 2014, how many red-

light cameras were operational?
4
(4)Four
7
4
15
None.
13
6
4
10
50
16
21
5
5
16
10
40
3
0
5
6
5
0
Open-Ended Response
As of June 30, 2015, how

many red-light cameras
were operational?
17
6
36
9
4
(4)Four
6
34
9
6
23
10
4
3
4
None
OCoee
Orange County
Osceola County
Palatka
Palm Coast
SUNRISE
Temple Terrace
Town of Davie
Town of Juno Beach

Town of Medley
Town Of Orange Park
TOWN OF SURFSIDE
4
3
None
10
6
4
1555
574
5426
6454
6251
10905
502
4657
4098
6304
16573
4882
7783
14600
55935
5473
38177
9233
2618
17947
9970
11501
14816
23314
34503
6507
14789
6696
3791
9262
5098
463
Total #
1149
191
3429
4380
4246
7949
349
2633
3162
3778
9908
3252
5019
9264
35032
3363
17616
5846
1830
10789
7630
8555
9381
15545
27062
3914
9026
4837
2022
6792
3345
287
# Paid
95
15
6
90
31
65
73
5
1
61
0
1064
31
0
229
66
4
182
0
19
88
1
0
46
0
11
19
28
10
24
13
23
186
67
44
1041
11
181
21
2
66
203
19
1848
16
27
19
10
445
3
0
152
0
39
77
95
94
11
113
48
248
113
175
292
304
26
838
112
28
63
21
2452
221
112
32
185
104
103
931
27
0
263
0
1069
1519
1633
1050
140
1268
1075
1463
4653
1328
184
4404
19122
1177
14943
1007
419
1371
1819
1561
4414
4846
3906
1113
3148
1492
1522
3076
1266
169
# Contested & # Contested & # Contested & # Issued as

pending
dismissed
upheld
UTC
32
0
19
0
60
598
51
0
0
524
0
1000
290
0
24
107
1367
0
145
620
0
1
10
3
0
# Pending
issuance as
UTC
0
None
44
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1000
64
9
15
Our office does not perform registration holds
288
83
0
8
1
22
18
0
unknown
UNKNOWN
Open-Ended Response
Electronically
Electronically
Electronically
Paper
Electronically
Electronically
Electronically
Paper
Electronically
Electronically
Electronically
Electronically
Electronically
Electronically
Electronically
Electronically
Both
Electronically
Paper
Electronically
Both
Electronically
Electronically
Electronically
Electronically
Electronically
Both
Both
Electronically
Electronically
Paper
Both
Response
0
9
148
235
283
574
494
94
291 total
1243
34
502
969 total repeats, 827 rcvd 2 notices 142 rcvd 3 notices

3232
176
3257
265
74
1135
236
427
999
838
2220
389
502
257
108
NO DATA AVAILABLE
90
5
Open-Ended Response
How many registration holds did your jurisdiction request as a How does your jurisdiction In order to identify the number of repeat offenders, please provide
Please provide the following information regarding Notices of Violation issued for red-light camera
result of red-light camera violations during the reporting period submit crash data to the the number of distinct vehicle owners issued Notices of Violation for
violations in your jurisdiction between July 1, 2014 and June 30, 2015.
(July 1, 2014 - June 30, 2015)?
multiple red-light camera violations.
Department?

11
11
North Miami
4
3
3
3
Maitland
10
Miami Springs
10
6
26
6
19
Hillsborough County
Javksonville
2
0
3
2
20
3

Green Cove Springs
Miami Beach
Cutler Bay
4
4
0
4
4
6
Open-Ended Response
Open-Ended
Response
Open-Ended Response
CLERMONT
Coral Gables
CORAL SPRINGS
As of June 30, 2015, at

how many were red-
light cameras
operational?
As of July 1, 2014, at
how many were red-
light cameras
operational?
18
Somewhat Important
Very Important
Town Of Orange Park
TOWN OF SURFSIDE
Very Important
Very Important
Very Important
Somewhat Important
Somewhat Important
Somewhat Important
Very Important
Very Important
Somewhat Important
Very Important
Very Important
Very Important
Very Important
Somewhat Important
Very Important
Somewhat Important
Very Important
Very Important
Very Important
Very Important
N/A
Very Important
Very Important
Somewhat Important
Very Important
Very Important
Very Important
Somewhat Important
Very Important
Very Important
Not Important
Very Important
Very Important
Very Important
Very Important
Very Important
Somewhat Important
Somewhat Important

observations
Traffic Volume
Somewhat Important
Somewhat Important
Very Important
Very Important
Somewhat Important
Very Important
Somewhat Important
Very Important
Very Important
Very Important
Very Important
Somewhat Important
Not Important
Somewhat Important
Somewhat Important
Very Important
Very Important
Not Important
Somewhat Important
Very Important
N/A
Very Important
Not Important
Very Important
Somewhat Important
Somewhat Important
Very Important
Somewhat Important
Somewhat Important
Very Important
Very Important
Somewhat Important
Somewhat Important
Somewhat Important
Somewhat Important
Somewhat Important

Town of Medley

Somewhat Important
Town of Juno Beach
Somewhat Important
Not Important
Somewhat Important
Somewhat Important
Very Important
Temple Terrace
Very Important
Very Important
Very Important
SUNRISE
Very Important
Not Important
Somewhat Important
Very Important
Somewhat Important
Palatka
Palm Coast
Somewhat Important
Somewhat Important
Somewhat Important
Very Important
Somewhat Important
Very Important
Very Important
Very Important
Somewhat Important
Very Important
Very Important
Not Important
Somewhat Important
Very Important
Somewhat Important
Somewhat Important
Very Important
Somewhat Important
Somewhat Important
Citizen complaints
Town of Davie
Very Important
Somewhat Important
Very Important
Very Important
North Miami
OCoee
Orange County
Osceola County
Very Important
Very Important
Miami Springs
N/A
Very Important
Miami Beach
Very Important
Somewhat Important
Maitland
Very Important
Not Important
Somewhat Important
Very Important
Somewhat Important
Very Important
Very Important
Somewhat Important
Somewhat Important
Traffic citation data
Very Important
Very Important
Very Important
Very Important
Very Important
Very Important
Very Important
Very Important
Very Important
Very Important
Very Important
Very Important
Very Important
Very Important
Very Important
Very Important
Very Important
Very Important
Very Important
Very Important
N/A
Very Important
Very Important
Very Important
Very Important
Very Important
Very Important
Very Important
Very Important
Very Important
Very Important
Somewhat Important
Pedestrian safety
The number of fatality crashes or

hit and run crashes that occur at
an intersection or approach.
Major Iintersections
Vehicle Accidents
Other than traffic crashes, please rank the following factors on importance when selecting which intersections to install red-light cameras.
Hillsborough County
Javksonville

Green Cove Springs
Cutler Bay
CLERMONT
Coral Gables
CORAL SPRINGS
Open-Ended Response
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Response
Did you relocate any existing

red-light cameras during the
reporting period?
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Change in pedestrian
safety
Change
in revenue
Decrease or Increase in number of
Change In Number of citations
Determined by number of violations and

UTC issued for each camera location.
Change in the number of violations issued
Change in the number of violations!
Change (decrease) in violations issued
Change in Number of Violations
Increase or decrease in the number of

violations issued over a specific period of
time.
CHange in Number of Violations
Lower violations results in safer

intersection
Reduction of Violations
CHANGE IN # OF VIOLATIONS
What factors are used to determine the success/failure of each camera location?
Change in number
of crashes
19
X
X
Maitland
Miami Beach
Miami Springs
SUNRISE
Temple Terrace
X
X
Town Of Orange Park
TOWN OF SURFSIDE

X
X

Town of Medley
Town of Juno Beach

X
Palatka
Palm Coast
Town of Davie
OCoee
Orange County
Osceola County
X
X
X
X
X
North Miami
X
X
Public Service Aides
Traffic Certified Non Sworn
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Hillsborough County
Javksonville
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
employee
employee
As of 06/23/2015, only a Law Enforcement

Officer issues UTCs if NOVs are unpaid.
Mailed by contractor after approval by sworn law

enforcement officer
Who issues Uniform Traffic Citations if Notices of Violation are unpaid? (select all that apply)
Law Enforcement
Officer

Green Cove Springs
Special Master
(Magistrate)
MAGISTRATE
employee
Cutler Bay
X
X
employee
Law Enforcement
Officer
Who reviews contested Notices of Violation? (select all that apply)
CLERMONT
Coral Gables
CORAL SPRINGS
Open-Ended Response
20
X
X
X
X
X
Miami Beach
Miami Springs
North Miami
OCoee
Orange County
Osceola County
Palatka
Palm Coast
SUNRISE
Temple Terrace
X
X
TOWN OF SURFSIDE

Yes
Town Of Orange Park
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
X
X
Yes
No
No
Yes

Town of Medley
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
Yes
Town of Juno Beach
Town of Davie
Maitland
Traffic Certified Non Sworn
Yes
Yes
X
X
Hillsborough County
Javksonville
X
X
X
X
No
Yes
Yes
No
Response

Green Cove Springs
employee
Cutler Bay
X
X
employee
X
X
Law Enforcement
Officer
Who reviews the camera images before Notices of Violation are issued? (select all that apply)
594
121
1035
1586
5240
37
2484
12515
1706
1815
11774
220
21839
5384
Not Available
Our jurisdiction does not track those

violations
Unknown - counts are not separated by type

of violation
7033
93
1128
NO DISTINGUISHABLE DATA
unknown
Open-Ended Response
Do you issue Notices of Violation

How many Notices of Violation were issued
(through red-light camera detection) for for right turns on red during the reporting
persons making right turns on red
period? (July 1, 2014 - June 30, 2015)
signals?
CLERMONT
Coral Gables
CORAL SPRINGS
Open-Ended Response
21
Based on the preset and visual speed at the time a vehicle makes the right turn and if there are any pedestrians in the
crosswalk or on the sidewalk.
maximum safe speeds per FDOT green book
Complete stop necessary prior to proceeding with the right-hand turn when heavy vehicle traffic on the roadway the vehicle
turns onto. Vehicle must not turn when pedestrians are within the crosswalk.
As per local head county traffic judge determination right turns completed at 12 mph or higher on a right turn in not careful
or prudent.
Vehicle traveling at 12 MPH or less, no pedestrians in the intersection, no cross or turning traffic affected.
Only one intersection is monitored. A vehicle has to pull into the bicycle lane and pass other vehicles before making the
right hand turn and failing to come to a complete stop.
When the vehicle in question is traveling in excess of 12 miles per hour and makes a right-hand turn without stopping or
when pedestrians are present in the crosswalk and the vehicle does not come to a complete stop.
THE DRIVER OF THE VEHICLE FAILED TO MAKE A COMPLETE STOP WHEN ENTERING THE INTERSECTION WITH
A RED LIGHT.
A right turn on red conducted at a speed greater than 15 mph without hesitating to slow prior to initiating the turn.
Consideration is given to the amount of traffic in the adjacent lanes, U-turning vehicles having the right of way, traffic on the
road way, and pedestrian traffic at the intersection.
The term careful and prudent is not specifically defined by Florida State Statute. It is however referred to in 316.1925 as
follows: Careless driving- Any person operating a vehicle upon the streets or highways within the state shall drive the same
in a careful and prudent manner, having regard for the width, grade, curves, corners, traffic, and all other attendant
circumstances, so as not to endanger the life, limb, or property of any person. Failure to drive in such manner shall
constitute careless driving and a violation of this section. It can therefore be inferred that making a right turn in a manner
that would violate 316.1925 meets the legislated standard for issuance of a right turn violation under 316.0083.
X
X
Traveling at a low rate of speed (Normally between 10-15mph). No pedestrians present. Not interrupting the flow of traffic.
any vehicle which makes a right hand turn and fails to fully stop before the turn and is travelling faster than 12 mph at the
start of the turn.
Only enforce right on red at locations that have a no turn on red sign when lit IF vehicle does not stop within their turn.
X
X
The vehicle should be traveling less than 15 miles per hour. Drivers must yield the right of way to other drivers and to
pedestrians attempting to cross the street within a crosswalk.
X
X
X
X

Increased
collision prevention system) Restriping Engineering signage Lighting
What action(s) has your jurisdiction taken to improve safety measures as a

result of your red light camera program?
(at intersection(s) with red light cameras)
Consideration of factors for a safe turn include: People present in the area, day or night, weather conditions, wet roads,
fog/smoke, number of cars on roadway, time of day, cars in intersection, speed of cars traveling, speed of violation vehicle,
size of vehicles around subject car, any obstructed views etc..
Motorists may make a turn in a careful and prudent manner after coming to a complete stop pursuant to the directives of
Florida statute 316.075. However, our officers use their discretion when reviewing the violations and do not issue violations
to anyone going under 16mph during a right hand turn unless aggravating circumstances exist.
The camera footage is viewed by a sworn law enforcement officer employed by the Manatee County Sheriff's Office. If the
deputy reviewing the footage feels they would ticket the violation if they were in person at the light then they make the
determination to ticket the violation from the camera.
The vehicle must come to a stop at some point during the negotiation of the turn. The vehicle must yield to pedestrians and
on-coming traffic.
If there is no apparent effort to slow down or stop and the speed exceeds a minimum of 10 mph.
HCSO maintains a 15 mph threshold for right on red violations and only possesses two intersections with right turn
enforcement.
RIGHT HAND TURN TO BE MADE AFTER EXERCISING CAUTION BY SLOWING DOWN TO ALLOW FOR
PEDESTRIANS IN CROSSWALK TO CONTINUE SAFELY AND TO ALSO GIVE RIGHT OF WAY TO ANY ONCOMING
TRAFFIC
More than 15 MPH approach and/ or pedestrians trying to cross the intersection.
Open-Ended Response

TOWN OF SURFSIDE
Town Of Orange Park

Town of Medley
Town of Juno Beach
Town of Davie
Temple Terrace
SUNRISE
Palatka
Palm Coast
OCoee
Orange County
Osceola County
North Miami
Miami Springs
Miami Beach
Maitland
Hillsborough County
Javksonville

Green Cove Springs
Cutler Bay
CLERMONT
Coral Gables
CORAL SPRINGS
Open-Ended Response
Statute 316.0083(1)(a), F.S., provides that "A notice of violation and a traffic citation may not be issued for failure to stop
at a red light if the driver is making a right-hand turn in a careful and prudent manner at an intersection where right-hand
turns are permissible." As this statute does not define "careful and prudent manner," please provide the definition used
by your jurisdiction when determining if a violation should be issued.

collision prevention system)
Restriping Engineering
Increased
signage
22
Lighting
What action(s) has your jurisdiction taken to improve safety measures as a result of
your red light camera program?
(at intersection(s) without red light cameras)
N/A

Green Cove Springs
na
none
None, program iniatiated on June 10, 2015
Town Of Orange Park
TOWN OF SURFSIDE

Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
no improvments made
None

Town of Medley
Lighted Message Boards
Town of Davie
No
No
Yes
Nothing
Town of Juno Beach
Yes
No
Temple Terrace
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
SUNRISE
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Palatka
Palm Coast
Yes
Yes
Yes
No action has been taken
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
OCoee
Orange County
Osceola County
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Response
North Miami
Miami Springs
Yes
Miami Beach
FDOT is currently upgrading both types of intersections as part of

their infrastructure improvement plans.
Yes
Yes
Maitland
Signal retiming to intersections with and without red light cameras
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Response
Is your jurisdiction
Has red-light camera
continuing the red-light footage been used
camera program in Fiscal to investigate other
Year 2015-2016?
crimes?
None during thie survey period
N/A
Cutler Bay
Hillsborough County
Javksonville
None
NA
Open-Ended Response
CLERMONT
Coral Gables
CORAL SPRINGS
What action(s) has your jurisdiction taken to improve safety

measures as a result of your red light camera program?
N/A
none
Cameras have been used several times to attempt to locate suspect vehicles in other crimes.
none
n/a
n/a
none
We have used the footage to investigate hit and runs, theft, battery and other types of crimes
VIDEO HAS BEEN USED FOR ACCIDENTS AND OTHER MISCELLANEOUS CRIMES WHERE A
VEHICLE WAS INVOLVED.
DUI crash caught on video while running the red light
Robberies, Burglaries, and other investigations

We have pulled video for other investigations such as robbery's, accidents, and other types of
investigations.
13 Requests for video to assist in investigations
Red light camera footage has been used 13 times during the reporting period to investigate other
crimes.
N/A
Red Light Camera Program in its infancy;initiated on June 10, 2015
n/a
na
Red light camera enforcement will be discontinued as of September 2015.

N/A
N/A
Video was requested 34 times from the vendro for police investigations related to hit and run crashes,
fatality crashes, robberies, shootings and homicides.
The City of Temple Terrace discontinued our program effective June 21, 2015.
To do further investigation of some felong crimes, hit and run crashes and tagged some videos as
evidence in cases. We also changed to the BOLO method where we have been looking for vehicles
in robberies and even homicide.
See number 23.
During this time period, video has been requested 64 times to assist in the investigation of crimes
from hit & run accidents to vehicular homicide.
Some calculations were done manually as ATS tracks based on a calendar year.
Has been used several times to investigate vehicle crashes to determine who the at fault driver was.
Hit & run, bank robbers, stolen vehicle
Footage from our cameras was requested 62 times during this time frame. Footage has been used
during various criminal investigations including murder, kidnapping, robbery, and burglary. Video
footage has also been used extensively during various crash investigations including fatalities.
Motorists ave also requested footage for civil actions relating to their traffic crashes.
56 traffic investigations, 1 THI, 17 general invest. 3 shootings and 4 homicides

Assault, crashes and homicide investigations
Homicide,Robbery,Shootings,Assaults,Fatal crashes
Hit and runs, traffic stops, homicides, missing persons, stolen vehicles etc.
QUESTION #17 - As of 6/23/2015, only a Law Enforcement Officer issues UTCs if NOVs are
unpaid.
Assist other agencies such as FHP
RLC provide vehicle descriptions for hit and run vehicles. In some cases, it can provide owner
information etc.
Question 9: Values denoted as zero were not available
Red light camera video has been used for traffic crashes involving injuries and homicides for time line
and suspect identification.
N/A
None Noted
NA
None
166 incidents of pulling videos for traffic accidents, felony crimes, and general investigations.
Has been used in Hit and Run and Fraud Investigations

During the reporting period, footage from RLCs was requested 60 times for crash investigations (one
involving a fatality), hit and run investigations, and for other criminal investigations (i.e. robberies,
thefts, etc.). Since the programs inception in 2011, RLC footage has assited offical investigations 133
For revision of accidents occuring at the intersectionsas well as to assist in Robbery, Homicide, etc
Open-Ended Response
Provide any specifications/clarifications for any of your answers.
VIDEO EVIDENCE OF INCIDENT

Traffic Homicide Investigations.
#9 - ANSWERS WITH ZERO WERE NO LONGER AVAILABLE
Accident, robbery, shooting, homicides have all had videos from cameras pulled for police
investigation.
When an incident occurs, the red light camera footage is used alot to view direction of travel, car
make/model, or who is at fault
Since June 2011, red light camera footage has assisted official investigations 170 times.
N/A
Footage has been used in furtherance of traffic crash investigations and routinely reviewed by
criminal investigators to help garner leads for a multitude of criminal acts
Surveillance has been reviewed 34 times

Homicides, Batteries, Missing Person, Robbery, Traffic Homicides, Burglary
Burglaries, Robberies, Traffic Accident, hit & runs, Fleeing and eluding cases
During the reporting period, footage from red light cameras were requested 63 times.
Used to investigate some Criminal Incidents and some Traffic Crashes
TRAFFIC CRASH INVESTIGATIONS

Murder, hit and runs, fleeing officers
SUSPECT VEHICLE'S DIRECTION OF TRAVEL AND POSSIBLE TAG NUMBERS
Accident, robbery, shooting, homicides have all had videos from cameras pulled for police
investigation.
Open-Ended Response
If yes, please provide additional details.
23

Florida Red Light Camera Analysis 2015

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Florida Red Light Camera Analysis 2015

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Red Light Camera

Fiscal Year 20142015

Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles

Summary of Survey Responses

Red Light Camera Summary Report: Fiscal Year 2014 - 2015

Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles

Law Enforcement Officer

Non-sworn Government Employee

Non-sworn Contractor Employee

Other (see Appendix D)

Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles

Pursuant to section 316.0083, Florida Statutes:

Alternative Safety Measures

Alternative Safety Measures

Intelligent Transportation System

Intelligent Transportation System

With Red-Light Camera

With Red Light Camera

Without Red-Light Camera

Without Red Light Camera

Without Red-Light Camera

Red Light Camera Summary Report: Fiscal Year 2014 - 2015

Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles

Before RLC Installed After RLC Installed

See Appendix C for definitions

Red Light Camera Summary Report: Fiscal Year 2014 - 2015

Red Light Camera Summary Report: Fiscal Year 2014 - 2015

Appendix A: Crashes Before

Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles

Red Light Camera Summary Report: Fiscal Year 2014 - 2015

Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles

Red Light Camera Summary Report: Fiscal Year 2014 - 2015

Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles

Red Light Camera Summary Report: Fiscal Year 2014 - 2015

A crash where two vehicles impact at an angle. For example, the

Appendix C: Glossary of Terms

CIty of South Pasadena

City of St. Petersburg

West Miami Police Dept.

Tampa Police Department

Broward Sheriff's Office

City of St. Petersburg

City of South Pasadena

Port Richey Police Department

City of Orlando/Code Enforcement

New Port Richey Police Department

Miami Gardens Police Department

Kissimmee Police Department

Homestead Police Dept

Hollywood Police Department

Hallandale Beach Police Dept.

Haines City Police Department

Gulfport Police Department

City of Doral Police Department

Cocoa Beach Police Department

Clewiston Police Department

Bradenton Police Dept.

Boynton Beach Police Dept.

Apopka Police Department

Boca Raton Police

Provide the contact information of the person completing the survey

Samuel Belfiore/SGT Stan Locke City of Winter Park Police Dept.

Corporal Paul Smalley

Sgt. Jim Loughlin