Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ISSN 0031-7454
Land and Water Resources Division, 2Agricultural Machinery Division, Institute of Agricultural Engineering, College
of Engineering and Agro-Industrial Technology, University of the Philippines Los Baos, College, Laguna 4031,
Philippines
*
Author for correspondence; e-mail: alfajardo@uplb.edu.ph , arthurfajardo@yahoo.com; Tel.: +63 49 536 8746, +63
49 536 2792
Canal irrigation systems in the Philippines are characterized by their poor performance. For an insight
on the reasons for this situation, 10 canal irrigation systems were randomly chosen to assess the
soundness of the water balance parameters assumed in estimating their design crop and farm water
requirements. Paddy percolation losses were measured and were compared with the assumed values
during the project design stage. Farm ditch losses were also measured. Farm water requirements were
computed on the basis of the measured percolation and farm ditch losses and estimated net seepage,
evapotranspiration and other losses.
The ratio of the actual area served to the design service area was computed for each of the sample
irrigation systems. Data on actual area irrigated were determined based on the records of the farming
activities by season of the institutions or associations responsible for the operation and management
of the irrigation systems. The discrepancies between design and measured farm water requirements
were then related to the proportions of the actual area served to design irrigation service areas to help
explain, in part, the reasons for the poor performance of the irrigation systems.
On the average, only about 27% of the aggregate design service area of the sample irrigation
systems was actually irrigated during the dry season. This was mainly due to underestimation of the
assumed on-farm water losses during the planning stage of these systems. In fact, only one of the 10
systems studied had its value of the design farm water requirement within 100% of the values
computed by using the measured percolation and farm ditch losses.
Although the designs and operations of canal irrigation systems in the Philippines are carried out
by two agencies that are both under the Department of Agriculture, there is very limited interaction
between design and operation engineers. Such absence of a feedback mechanism could have resulted
in continuous use of the same flawed designs. Design shortcomings have not been corrected and the
same design faults can be found in most of the canal irrigations systems. Failure to properly identify
and rectify the design shortcomings could have been the major reason for insignificant increases in
rice cropping intensity even after massive rehabilitation efforts. It is, therefore, high time to give more
emphasis on the formulation of appropriate irrigation design criteria.
Key Words: canal irrigation systems, cropping intensity, design water requirements, irrigation system design
INTRODUCTION
The canal irrigation systems in the Philippines have been
performing below expectations (Ferguson 1987; David
2003, 2008). These irrigation systems, which include
national irrigation systems (NIS), communal irrigation
systems (CIS) and small water impounding projects
The Philippine Agricultural Scientist Vol. 95 No. 2 (June 2012)
200
year in the total NIS and CIS service areas during the
pre-AFMA years (19921996) earlier reported by David
(2003) had increased to about 134,000 ha per year during
the post-AFMA years of 19982004 (David 2008, 2009).
This trend accounted for the very slow annual rate of
increase of only about 10,000 ha in the actual NIS and
CIS service areas despite massive efforts of rehabilitating
an average of 124,597 ha per year and constructing new
irrigation facilities at 19,285 ha per year during 1995
2005.
Delos Reyes and Jopillo (1986) studied the
performance of CIS in terms of the proportion of the
design service area actually irrigated under participatory
and non-participatory systems of water management. The
results also revealed low ratios of 64% and 74% under
non-participatory and participatory systems of irrigation
water management, respectively.
Research findings in the Philippines and in other
Asian countries pointed to over-optimistic assumptions of
irrigation service area during the planning stage and
faulty and unrealistic design criteria as the main causes of
the poor performance of canal irrigation systems (World
Bank 1996; Rice 1997; Horst 1998: Plusquellec 2002;
David 2003, 2008). The design shortcomings include
unrealistic
assumptions
on
canal
hydraulics,
overestimation of surface water supply availability, and
underestimation of seepage and percolation.
A review of the performance of World Banksupported large-scale irrigation projects by Plusquellec
(2002) showed that the main cause of the lower-thanexpected performance of such projects was related to
over-optimistic assumptions regarding efficiency. The
impact of poor physical performance in terms of water
distribution and concurrent poor construction standards
on agricultural productivity was often overlooked.
Plusquellec (2002) also cited the results of a formal
evaluation of 21 irrigation projects by the World Banks
Operations Evaluation Department (OED) in 1990. For
the 21 projects, the estimated average economic rates of
return were 17.7% at appraisal, 14.8% at project
completion and only 9.3% at impact evaluation.
Another study (World Bank 1996) on the impact of
investments in 6 gravity irrigation systems in Thailand,
Myanmar and Vietnam showed that the economic rates of
return not only fell short of appraisal projections by a
substantial margin, but were all below 7%. The gap
between appraisal expectations and actual results was due
largely to excessively optimistic estimates of crop areas
served, irrigation project design faults and construction
inadequacy.
Horst (1998) and Ersten (2009) postulated that the
problems in irrigation in many developing countries are
rooted in the technology of the colonial era and the lack
of adaptation to the new socio-economic environment of
the post-colonial period. During the colonial times,
201