Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Lstub
W1
L1
Wstub
Zo/2
port 1
qm1
Zm1,
1:1
Z1e, Z1o, q1
Zo, q2
Zstub, qstub
Zo
port 2
R
Zo
port 3
Zo/2
Zm1,
qm1
2
Z1e, Z1o, q1
Zo, q2
Zstub, qstub
a
Zm1,
qm1
1:1
Z1e, q1
Zo, q2
2R
Z0/2
Zstub, qstub
Z0
b
Zm1,
1:1
qm1
2
Z1o, q1
Z0/2
Zo, q2
Zstub, qstub
Z0
s
W
rm
Lm1
Wm1
Wm
Wm
L
a
Ws2
R
Ws1
rs
Ls1
Ls2
b
The microstrip to slotline transitions include microstrip lines terminated with capacitive circular stubs with radii rm as virtual short circuits. On the other hand, the slotline at the ground is terminated with
inductive slots, which are circular in shape with radii rs as virtual
open circuits. As a result, signals are properly coupled from the top to
the bottom layer through the transition. Moreover, there is a narrow rectangular slot with Ws1 as width and Ls1 as length at the ground for proper
coupling of the signal. The design of the transitions follows the design
methods of [6]. The length and width of two output terminals of the transitions are Lm1 (which denes m1 as the electrical length) and Wm1
(which denes Zm1 as the impedance). These terminals are connected
afterwards to a pair of tightly coupled lines with W1 as width and L1
as length to have Z1e and Z1o as the even- and odd-mode impedances
and electrical length of 1. Moreover, two open-ended stubs are
connected in parallel with the output ports to improve the output
matching [8].
The normal operation of the proposed out-of-phase device is the odd
mode. Therefore, it is necessary to place the isolation resistor in the
proper position within the design to improve isolation. The resistor
cannot provide any improved isolation if it is connected directly
across the output ports in a similar way to the Wilkinson divider. To
the contrary, it will cause a high insertion loss as it will absorb the
out-of-phase signals, which are the result of the normal operating
mode of the out-of-phase power divider. To overcome this, a narrow
slot with Ws2 as width and Ls2 (less than a quarter of the wavelength
at the centre frequency) as length ended with two rectangular slots is
placed under the tightly coupled lines at the top layer to couple the
Fig. 3 Top (left) and bottom (right) views of fabricated power divider
8.6
5
2.5
0.2
Ls2
rm
Lm1
Lstub
10.8
6
16.5
4.9
S-parameter, dB
15
20
25
simulated S23
measured S23
30
simulated S11
measured S11
35
simulated S21
measured S21
simulated S22
phase
measured S22
200
190
E-mail: u.ahmed1@uq.edu.au
10
180
45
50
1.0
40
Results: The proposed power divider was fabricated (Fig. 3) for verication to obtain equal power division over the whole investigated band
of frequency from 1 to 4 GHz. The substrate Rogers RO4003C with a
dielectric constant of 3.38, thickness of 0.4 mm and loss tangent of
0.0027 was used. The initial dimensions of the proposed device were
found using the aforementioned initial values of the design parameters
in the microstrip coupled lines design equations of [9]. The design is
then optimised using the high-frequency structure simulator. The nal
dimensions of the power divider are listed in Table 1. The nal structure
has compact overall dimensions of 30 60 mm. The simulated and
measured scattering parameters along with the differential phase of
the power divider are shown in Fig. 4.
Both the simulated and measured return losses at the input port as well
as the two output ports (S22 = S33) are better than 10 dB over the whole
designed band 14 GHz. The measured isolation between the output
ports of the fabricated device is better than 15 dB across the same
band, which is equivalent to a 120% fractional bandwidth. The power
is equally divided between the two output ports with <0.5 dB additional
insertion loss over the whole band. The difference in phase between the
output ports of the design is 180 1 over the band 14 GHz, which
proves that the proposed device performs well as an out-of-phase
power divider.
170
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
frequency, GHz
3.5
4.0
References
1 Chiu, L., Yum, T.Y., Xue, Q., and Chan, C.H.: A wideband compact
parallel-strip 180 Wilkinson power divider for pushpull circuitries,
IEEE Microw. Wirel. Compon. Lett., 2006, 16, (1), pp. 4951
2 Shi, J., and Xu, K.: Compact differential power divider with enhanced
bandwidth and in-phase or out-of phase output ports, Electron. Lett.,
2014, 50, (17), pp. 12091211
3 Kim, J.-S., Park, M.-J., and Kim, M.-G.: Out-of-phase Wilkinson power
divider, Electron. Lett., 2009, 45, (1), pp. 5960
4 Chang, Y., Che, W., and Wang, X.: Wideband balanced out-of-phase
network based on double-sided parallel-strip line, IET Microw.
Antennas Propag., 2014, 8, (15), pp. 13221326
5 Zhang, X., Wang, T., Xiang, Y., and Liang, C.: Wideband three-way
out-of-phase microstrip power divider, Electron. Lett., 2015, 51, (5),
pp. 404406
6 Ahmed, U.T., and Abbosh, A.: Wideband out of phase power divider
using microstrip to slotline transitions, coupled lines and shunt openended stubs, Microw. Opt. Technol. Lett., 2015, 57, (8), pp. 17991802
7 Chen, Q., and Xu, J.: Out-of-phase power divider based on two-layer
SIW, Electron. Lett., 2014, 50, (5), pp. 10051007
8 Henin, B., and Abbosh, A.: Wideband hybrid using three-line coupled
structure and microstrip-slot transitions, IEEE Microw. Wirel.
Compon. Lett., 2013, 23, (7), pp. 335337
9 Abbosh, A.: Analytical closed-form solutions for different congurations of parallel-coupled microstrip lines, IET Microw. Antennas
Propag., 2009, 3, (1), pp. 137147