unveiled on April 14 at the company's plant at Lod Airport (see also photograph, World News). The aircraft is based on the Dassault Mirage airframe but has a single General Electric J79 engine, believed to be the -17 version which produces 17,9001b of thrust with afterburning. This compares with 13,2001b thrust with afterburning for the Mirage IIICJ's Snecma Atar 9C. The existence of a J79-powered Mirage in Israel has been postulated for a number of years, with most of the world's Press calling the project Barak (Lightning). It was only in January (see Flight for January 23, page 96) that we exclusively recorded that Israel Aircraft Industries had told Flight that no project called Barak existed in the company. It was freely admitted though that J79s had been fitted to Mirages, with intake and cooling problems resulting. What appears to be an afterburner cooling duct is clearly visible at the fin root in the photographs of Kfir, and the intake, although very similar to that of the Mirage, is slightly larger. What is also evident from the photographs is the fact that the J79 is a fraction over 2ft shorter than the Atar and the Kfir is as a result very squarely cut off at the tail end with virtually no nozzle protruding aft of the fuselage. Although somewhat shorter than the Atar 9C, the J79 has a very similar diameter, slightly higher mass
Externally the Kfir resembles the Mirage 5
more than the Mirage IIIC which has served Israel well for the past 10 years. It is not known whether the aircraft shown were built entirely from scratch by Israel Aircraft Industries or whether they were "pre-production" aircraft heavily modified from original Mirage airframes. No production numbers or rates have been announced
One of the two IAI Kfirs shown at Lod lifts off
(above) for a demonstration of flying qualities. Clearly visible is what appears to be an afterburner cooling duct at the base of the fin, presumably mounted so prominently to collect as much air as possible while manoeuvring in afterburner at high angles of attack
flow and approximately double the
overall pressure ratio. The American engine also weighs a little more than the French one. Reliability and availability of spares for the J79 are thought to be appreciably betterindeed this was one of the primary reasons for the re-engining in the first place. The spares holding for the J79-powered F-4 Phantoms must be very considerable. Specific fuel consumption of the J79 is probably somewhat better than that of the Atar but this is almost certainly offset in the case of the Kfir by the fact that the higher-rated engine will burn a greater overall amount. A little extra fuel capacity may have been obtained by the small stretch of the fuselage just aft of the cockpit, first done by Dassault on the Mirage HIE. It follows that the interception and dash performance of the Kfir is probably considerably better
than that of a standard Mirage, and
the thrust advantage more than balances the weight disadvantage thereby probably conferring a better overall power:weight ratio and dogfight performance. Endurance, however, may have been marginally reduced. It was revealed during the demonstration of Kfir at Lod that its claimed top speed is Mach 2-2-plus and its stabilised ceiling for combat purposes is more than 50,000ft. Descriptive literature said, without elaborating, that the aircraft had multi-mode weapon-delivery systems. It is thought that the flying-control system is entirely Israeli-developed fly-by-wire. The system is supplied by MBT Weapon Systems and is based on twin computers; it is known to have been retrofitted to at least some Mirage IIICJs. According to the Israeli Defence Minister, Mr Shimon Peres, the Kfir is one of the cheapest modern combat aircraft in the world at approximately $4 million. About half this amount, he said, was attributable to development and labour costs. IAI literature also made it clear that the aircraft was designed for air-to-surface as well as air-to-air missions although performance ad-