SAINT JUDE CATHOLIC SCHOOL

San Miguel, Manila

HIGH SCHOOL DEPARTMENTBASIC EDUCATION
School Year 2015 2016
ENGLISH GRADE 7

GRADING SHEET for INFORMAL DEBATE

Group Members Name and Class Number: ______________________________________________________________________________________________________
Grade and Section: _____
Date of Performance: _____________
Criteria

Excellent

Good

Needs Improvement

Respect for the

Other Team
25%

18-25 pts
The group used courteous words when
presenting arguments and patiently waits
for their own turn.

5-10 pts
The group used very impolite and rude
words in presenting their arguments.

Understanding of
Topic
25%

18-25 pts
The team clearly understood the topic
deeply and presented their information
forcefully and convincingly.

10-17 pts
There were instances of impatience seen
in the group; there were also several
occurrences of impolite words the group
used in presenting their arguments.
10-17 pts
The team seemed to understand only the
main points of the topic and presented
their information with quite a level of
ease.

Rebuttals and
CounterArguments
35%
Presentation Style
15%

27-35 pts
All or most of the counter-arguments were
accurate, relevant and strong.

19-26 pts
Some counter arguments were weak and
irrelevant.

10-18 pts
All or most of the counter-arguments were
not accurate and/or relevant.

11-15 pts
Team consistently used gestures, eye
contact, tone of voice and a level of
enthusiasm.

6-10 pts
One or more members of the team had a
presentation style that were not
consistent with the rest of the teams.

3-5 pts
The teams does not have a concrete
presentation style.

SCORE

5-10 pts
The team did not show an adequate
understanding of the topic.

Remarks and Signature of Teacher

Total Score

________________________________________________________________________________

______

SAINT JUDE CATHOLIC SCHOOL

San Miguel, Manila
HIGH SCHOOL DEPARTMENTBASIC EDUCATION
School Year 2015 2016
ENGLISH GRADE 7

GRADING SHEET for INFORMAL DEBATE

Group Members Name and Class Number: ______________________________________________________________________________________________________
Grade and Section: _____
Date of Performance: _____________
Criteria

Excellent

Good

Needs Improvement

Respect for the

Other Team
25%

18-25 pts
The group used courteous words when
presenting arguments and patiently waits
for their own turn.

5-10 pts
The group used very impolite and rude
words in presenting their arguments.

Understanding of
Topic
25%

18-25 pts
The team clearly understood the topic
deeply and presented their information
forcefully and convincingly.

10-17 pts
There were instances of impatience seen
in the group; there were also several
occurrences of impolite words the group
used in presenting their arguments.
10-17 pts
The team seemed to understand only the
main points of the topic and presented
their information with quite a level of
ease.

Rebuttals and
CounterArguments
35%
Presentation Style
15%

27-35 pts
All or most of the counter-arguments were
accurate, relevant and strong.

19-26 pts
Some counter arguments were weak and
irrelevant.

10-18 pts
All or most of the counter-arguments were
not accurate and/or relevant.

11-15 pts
Team consistently used gestures, eye
contact, tone of voice and a level of
enthusiasm.

6-10 pts
One or more members of the team had a
presentation style that were not
consistent with the rest of the teams.

3-5 pts
The teams does not have a concrete
presentation style.

SCORE

5-10 pts
The team did not show an adequate
understanding of the topic.

Remarks and Signature of Teacher

Total Score

________________________________________________________________________________

______