Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Deployment Analysis
Key Issues/Constraints:
• The proposed E-3 project covers 4.9 miles of land border with Mexico in the
Naco Border Patrol Station Area of Responsibility (AOR). The cities of Naco,
Bisbee, Sierra Vista and Hereford, Arizona are located directly north of the
project area and have a combined population of 57,883. The city of Naco, Sonora,
Mexico lies directly south of the project area and has a population of 4,896
people. (b) (7)(E) Formatted: Highlight
• Highway 92 parallels the US/Mexico Border approximately 1-2 miles north from
the border. The proximity of this highway impacts the time-distance requirement.
Highway 90 runs from Sierra Vista north to Interstate 10. (b) (7)(E) Formatted: Highlight
• The rugged terrain increases the difficulty of tracking and detection for Border
Patrol Agents. The advantage that the terrain gives to the illegal traffic impacts
the time distance requirement for the agents on the border.
Alternatives Analysis:
• Baseline – (b) (7)(E) Formatted: Highlight
• Sensors – Deployment of sensors on active trails will give detection and limited
tracking.
(b) (7)(E) Formatted: Highlight
o Although sensors detect potential traffic on the ground, (b) (7)(E) Formatted: Highlight
(b) (7)(E)
• Cameras – Cameras will provide the initial visual detection of persons and
vehicles entering the United States.
o The terrain will make it challenging for cameras to effectively track the
targets as they move through the canyons, washes, and vegetation.
(b) (7)(E)
Formatted: Highlight
o The 3 year cost for MSS units only (not including any road construction or
improvement costs) – $3,400,800
o The Sector Chief Patrol Agent anticipates the deployment of MSSs
combined with the current deployment baseline will facilitate increased
identification and classification capabilities, will aid in detection but will
not enhance deterrence or response requirements that the pedestrian fence
alternative provides.
• Border Patrol Agents – Border Patrol Agents are capable of detecting entries,
identifying and classifying the threat, and responding to intrusions.
(b) (7)(E) Formatted: Highlight
(b) (7)(E)
o Cost is $150,000 per agent (to include salary, benefits and equipment)
o Total cost of agent only alternative over 3 years – $310,500,000
o The Sector Chief Patrol Agent anticipates the deployment (b) (7)(E) Formatted: Highlight
is
• Pedestrian Fence – 4.9 miles of pedestrian fence will deter illegal entrants who
are not physically capable of climbing the structure and significantly delay those
who may be fit enough to climb it.
o Bollard design (PV-1) built to accommodate anti-climb, vehicle stop
capability and 18’ height requirement.
o The 3 year cost to construct and maintain fencing, access roads, and
associated drainage installation – $27,738,190
o As a stand alone feature, pedestrian fence cannot detect illegal entrants or
alert enforcement personnel for a proper response and resolution to the
situation. As a result, personnel and technology are required to
compliment tactical infrastructure.
o Proposed access roads and fencing will enhance operations by increasing
agent mobility and enabling them to tactically address the high volume of
pedestrian traffic in the area. Tucson Sector has requested a fence design
that meets both pedestrian and vehicle stop capability requirements for the
E-3 segment.
o The Sector Chief Patrol Agent anticipates the deployment of pedestrian
fencing and supporting road infrastructure combined with the current
baseline deployment will enhance detection, identification, classification,
and response requirements. In addition, the pedestrian fence provides the
necessary persistence impedance requirement that facilitates long term
sustainability.
• Vehicle Fence – 4.9 miles of vehicle fence curtails and deters illegal vehicle
traffic.
o The high level of foot traffic will easily defeat the vehicle fence.
o Estimated cost to construct vehicle fence is $2.2 million per mile not
including necessary road and drainage structures.
o The 3 year cost to construct vehicle fence – $14,014,000
o The Sector Chief Patrol Agent anticipates that the deployment of the
vehicle fence combined with the current deployment baseline will not
enhance detection, identification, classification and response requirements.
Recommended Solution:
• Deploy pedestrian fencing that includes a vehicle barrier component to deter and
to significantly slow those who are attempting to cross into the United States
illegally.
• Compliment the pedestrian fence with technology and necessary access roads.
o Deploy a sensor system on the fence to alert agents when illegal entrants
are attempting to climb or tamper with the fence.
o Build access roads and improve the patrol roads to facilitate fence
construction and upgrade patrol activities.
o Deploy cameras providing overlapping view sheds of the fence to provide
enhanced surveillance and compliment detection capabilities.
o Deploy visual deterrence systems (lights that may be activated by camera
operators) for nighttime deterrence, and audio systems (speakers that
allow operators to “talk” to potential illegal entrants to let them know they
have been detected and will face arrest if they continue into the US.
• Deploy agents on the border in a mobile capacity.
o Agents’ presence on the border is a deterrent.
o Complimenting the baseline agents with pedestrian fence, access roads,
and detection technology is the best solution.
Projected Results:
• Illegal entries will decrease and the crime that accompanies the smuggling
activity will decrease as well. Criminal activity from bandits and others that
result from narcotics and human smuggling include kidnapping, robbery, murder,
rape, extortion, and robbery. The result of decreased criminal activity is a better
quality of life to the communities.
• The ranch lands will experience less tampering of their livestock fences and piles
of trash left by illegal aliens.
• The agents will decrease their response time to detected traffic with the addition
of the fence and patrol roads in the E-3 segment.