Professional Documents
Culture Documents
...This writer, it must be said, is not unhip to the problem; his final stanza acknowledges, "But
this is already too much." He then exits with a list of images that flesh out his summary remark,
that "Life is rushing by like a mad, swollen river." It's a simile typical of Collins in being both
commonplace and readily replaceable. Not much would be lost here if life rushed by like a
runaway train or like a Derby thoroughbred."Victoria's Secret" might, on a good night, stir up a
bit of group hilarity (though at the reading I attended the mirth faded after the first couple
stanzas), and we are all grateful for any amount of harmless laughter. My point is that the humor
doesn't lead to fresh insight or observation: The poem doesn't go anywhere except on to another
species of cliché--the lugubrio-comical (to coin a Polonius-like categorization) as well as the
merely ludicrous.
The standard Collins poem also calls for the presentation of liberal-arts, and especially English-
major, credentials--but with an aggressively flippant, superior-to-all-that-stuffy-literary-stuff
attitude. Readers and listeners presumably (given the sales record, given the graph of laughter at
his readings) adore this opportunity to feel in the know after being handed the easiest possible
references, and also enjoy feeling superior to any and all great dead authors. In Sailing Alone we
come across sophomoric sendups of Petrarch, William Wordsworth, Stevens--and notable others.
One of the more memorable examples is a signature piece from Picnic, Lightning: "Taking Off
Emily Dickinson's Clothes." Here we find a liberal sprinkling of Collins's pronoun of
preference and plenty of puerile humor, together with the use of a famous author as both source
of authority and object of conquest. It begins with the speaker / seducer recounting how he
removed Dickinson's "tippet made of tulle," then her "long white dress," then released various
"Catches, straps, and whalebone stays." The striptease progresses through a series of unrelated
similes and metaphors--in a manner typical of this writer who seldom carries through on a
conceit (e.g., Dickinson's body is compared in rapid succession to an iceberg and to a swan).
Unlike another striptease poem, John Donne's "Going to Bed" (Elegy 15), in which a man speaks
his frank longing and cheerfully presents his naked vulnerability before his mistress, Collins's
verse remains self-protective and cold. After six stanzas, it ends with this:
Constructed upon "What I can tell you" / "What I can't tell you" rhetorical turns, the description
depends--perhaps too heavily--on the assumption that every virginal creature is just waiting
for Billy Collins to get her out of her clothes. And what risible clothes: we get to snicker at
romance-novel "mother-of-pearl / buttons down the back, / so tiny and numerous that it takes
forever." She's so laughably premodern, that Dickinson, so repressed, so ready for ravishment.
By quoting from her most anthologized poems (the carriage from "Because I could not stop for
Death," the fly from "I heard a Fly buzz--when I died"), Collins gives us to know his literary
credentials--we know now that he's read what's assigned on an undergraduate syllabus--and
compliments listeners / readers on theirs. By quoting more from Dickinson at the
end, Collins may of course be attempting to acknowledge her powerful strangeness, but this
brand of homage feels more like appropriation. Dickinson, meanwhile, remains perfectly capable
of defending herself, and does not need more than a single, brief quotation ("reason is a plank")
in order to make her bedroom intruder stand, somewhat pathetically, stripped before us. Still, the
poem is a little bit ugly, isn't it? It smacks of unexamined aggression, which makes it resemble a
rape. The listener at a reading who joins in the laughter (as I did, though I stopped not long after
the "tippet made of tulle") is likely to be left with an unpleasant aftertaste.
The final main ingredient in the Collins verse kitchen is the Romantically pitched you've-just-
gotta-know-it's-a-poem ending. Interestingly,Collins has clung to this nineteenth-century practice
despite expressed antipathy for Romantic poetry. ("The Romantics killed off humor, and they
also eliminated sex," he asserts in a recent Newsweek interview--a remark that overlooks, among
other Romantic exuberance, the comic brio and sexual worldliness of Byron but that does shed
light on Collins's defiant embracement of the silly with the salacious.) He favors the resounding
pentameter ending--or, in contemporary style, the approximate pentameter--replete with time-
tested references to nature and travel, as in these final lines from assorted poems in The Art of
Drowning:
"... and pick out the dot of a hawk lost in the blue."
And these, from Picnic, Lightning (I've bracketed the extrapentameter first syllables of each
line):
"Across the pale parabolas of joy"--but no, that's P. G. Wodehouse's toss-off in Leave It to
Psmith.
Not every one of Collins's conclusions is iambic and determinedly poetical, but he can generally
be counted on to exit with a flourish, the operatic tenor in a velvet cape. In his new poems, that
cape still occasionally swirls on its way out the door (e.g., "with no end or name, some boundless
province of water"). In these more mortality-obsessed verses, which also have showy references
to Asian poetry and to jazz artists Sonny Rollins and Thelonious Monk, he seems a little less
preoccupied with glancing over his Anglo-American literary shoulder--although Petrarch's
"crazy tights" (noted above) do make their appearance in this most recent group, as do "coffee
and oranges," lifted again, in a different poem, from Stevens. On the whole, though these new
productions include the humor ingredient, they drag a bit, mechanical and weary. In a passage
of "Pavilion" that's fresher and less erratic in its figurative language than usual, Collins admits
to growing tired of his own bag of tricks:
my eyes closed,
2.
Billy Collins has a reputation as an unusually reader-friendly poet; and that's certainly the case,
in the way a jokester/charmer strikes everyone as a friendly sort of fellow, or in the way we say
"user-friendly" about a piece of computer software, meaning that it doesn't require too much of
us. But if we ask whether Collins demonstrates consistent affection, good will, and regard for his
reader? It's easy to see his ambivalence toward poetic predecessors, his way of biting the hand
that feeds him lines. What about his living audience?...