Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ARC Centre of Excellence for Geotechnical Science and Engineering, Department of Civil, Surveying and Environmental
Engineering, The University of Newcastle Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia
b
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Alberta, Canada T6G 2W2
c
Department of Building and Construction, City University of Hong Kong, Tat Chee Avenue, Kowloon, Hong Kong
d
Department of Civil Engineering, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong
Received 25 May 2010; received in revised form 25 June 2012; accepted 15 July 2012
Available online 2 May 2013
Abstract
As granular soils may be compressible or have inadequate strength, compaction is particularly useful when soils are subjected to dynamic loading or
cyclic loading. A new laboratory apparatus for investigating dynamic compaction has been designed and fabricated. The basic principle of this new
technique is to introduce vibrations during the expansion process in static compaction grouting. In these tests, the injection pressure, the excess pore water
pressure, and the change in void ratio of the specimens are measured. The main focus is to investigate the development of the injection pressure, the void
ratio, and the excess pore water pressure due to dynamic compaction and the subsequent consolidation of the soils. In addition, the relative density of the
soils is used to evaluate the dynamic compaction efciency. Scaled laboratory experiments are conducted to study the effect of this dynamic compaction
frequency on compaction efciency. The experimental results show that the change in void ratio in the dynamic compaction tests is about four times greater
than that in the static compaction tests. Dynamic compaction frequency plays an important role in soil densication due to dynamic compaction.
& 2013 The Japanese Geotechnical Society. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Dynamic compaction; Frequency; Soil densication; Compaction efciency
1. Introduction
During the past decades, with the development of building
construction and geotechnical engineering, soil improvement by
n
Corresponding author. Tel.: +61 2 4921 5745; fax: +61 2 4921 6991.
E-mail addresses: Shanyong.Wang@newcastle.edu.au,
bcwangsy@126.com (S.Y. Wang), dave.chan@ualberta.ca (D.H. Chan),
bckclam@cityu.edu.hk (K.C. Lam), skau@hkucc.hku.hk (S.K.A. Au).
1
Tel.: +1 780 492 4725; fax: +1 780 492 0249/+1 780 492 8198.
2
Tel.: +852 2788 7238; fax: +852 2788 7238.
3
Tel.: +852 2857 8552; fax: +852 2559 5337.
Peer review under responsibility of The Japanese Geotechnical Society.
densication has shown much growth in the world, and more and
more poor or unstable soils are encountered in many projects.
If granular soils are compressible or have inadequate strength,
compaction is particularly useful when soils are subjected to
dynamic loading or cyclic loading. Both dynamic compaction
and vibro-compaction are capable of achieving signicant densication of loose granular deposits (Greenwood and Kirsch, 1984).
The effects of vibrations on granular soils are changes in density
and in the state of the pore pressure in the material. The use of the
vibratory method, therefore, is an effective means of compacting
soils (Mitchell and Jardine, 2002).
Compaction grouting is a traditional technology for soil
improvement; it is performed by injecting highly viscous grout
under high pressure to compact a compressible soil (Graf, 1969;
Warner and Brown, 1974). Many researchers have created physical
0038-0806 & 2013 The Japanese Geotechnical Society. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2013.04.007
Data Log
System
8
Personal
computer
Pressure/volume
Controller
4
2
Pressure Pulse
Device
Air
Compressor
Loading Frame
Cast Iron Weights
Personal Computer
De-Air Water Supply Device
Volume Gauge
GDS controller
Pressure Pulsing
Device
Fig. 2(a) shows the schematics of the experimental setup for the
dynamic compaction grouting tests. The setup consists of a
standard triaxial cell with an electronic data logger connected to
a computer to record and control the cell pressure, the back
7
5
Specimen
device
463
Specimen
device
Carbon dioxide
supplier
Injection Needle
Loose Soil
Membrane of
injection needle
Loose Soil
Membrane of
injection needle
Cell Pressure
Transducer
Pore Pressure
Transducer
O ring
Injection Pressure
Transducer
Back Pressure
Transducer
464
Tie Wire
GDS Controller
Motor Speed
Controller
Motor
Pressure Pulsing
Device
465
B
O
2
3
Sample 1
Sample 2
Sample 3
80
60
40
20
0
0.01
0.1
Particle Size (mm)
466
Vw
Vs
Vw
Vw
Vw
Vs
1
Hence
e e0 e e0 V w
Value
8%
30%
64%
6%
0.18 mm
0.7 mm
1.8 mm
10
36%
25%
11%
1820 kg/m3
11%
1.096
0.493
e=e0 1V w =e0
10
For each test, the initial void ratio of the soil can be measured
before the test, and the change in volume of the water can be
measured using a volume gauge (Fig. 8(b)) during the test.
In addition, the term relative density is commonly used to
indicate the denseness of a granular soil. In the present study,
the relative density of soil is selected for determining the
compaction efciency after dynamic compaction grouting. The
relative density is dened as
emax e
Dr
11
emax emin
where Dr is the relative density, emax is the void ratio of the
soil in the loosest condition, and emin is the void ratio of the
soil in the densest condition. Since the maximum void ratio
(emax) and the minimum void ratio (emin) can be measured
beforehand, as shown in Table 1, the relative density (compaction efciency) of the soil, due to dynamic compaction, can be
determined by calculating the void ratio (e) based on Eq. (9).
In addition, based on Eqs. (9) and (11), the relationship
between void ratio change (e) and Dr is
Dr
emax e0 e
emax e0
e
emax emin
emax emin emax emin
12
In fact, section e/(emaxemin) has been dened as compaction efciency in Wang et al. (2010).
4. Experimental results
Based on Eq. (9), Fig. 9 shows the normalized void ratio
e/e0 versus time for static and dynamic compaction tests. The
static injection time is kept constant at 0.3 min, the injected
volume of each cycle is 8 ml, the dynamic compaction period
is 1 min, the dynamic compaction frequency is 6 Hz, and the
consolidation time is 30 min. It is noted that, the injection rate
in the tests is controlled by the GDS controller at 30 ml/min.
If the injection time is kept at 0.3 min, the injection volume of
each cycle is 9 ml. However, due to the loss during the
Volume
1.00
VW
0.95
0.90
Vw
e/e0
Water
V0
0.85
0.80
VW
Solid
0.75
VS =1
0.70
0
20
40
60
80
100
Time (Mins)
Fig. 8. Saturated soil element and volume gauge to measure volume change of
soils. (a) Saturated soil element with solid volume =1 and (b)Volume Gauge.
Fig. 9. Normalized void ratio e/e0 versus time for static and dynamic
compaction.
500
400
300
200
100
0
0
20
40
60
Time (Mins)
80
100
Fig. 10. Injection pressures versus time for static and dynamic compaction.
260
240
220
467
200
180
160
140
120
100
80
60
0
20
40
60
80
100
Time (Mins)
Fig. 11. Pore water pressures versus time for static and dynamic compaction.
468
0.990
e/e0
0.985
0.980
0.975
0.970
0.965
0.960
0
10
15
20
25
30
Time (Mins)
Fig. 12. Normalized void ratio e/e0 versus time for different dynamic
compaction frequencies.
0.47
Acknowledgments
Relative Density
0.46
0.45
0.44
0.43
Initial Relative Density
Final Relative Density
0.42
References
0.41
0.40
-2
10
12
14
16
18
20
Frequency (Hz)
Fig. 13. Normalized relative densities versus dynamic compaction frequency.