1

Elliott Stafford and Associated

lawyers@elliottstafford.com.au
Cc:

10

21-2-2016

Mr Garry McIntosh, Associate to His Honour Mullaly J. judgemullaly.chambers@countycourt.vic.gov.au

Mr Wayne Wall & Buloke Shire Council buloke@buloke.vic.gov.au
Daniel Andrews Premier Victoria daniel.andrews@parliament.vic.gov.au
Mr Martin Pakula, martin.pakula@parliament.vic.gov.au & attorney-general@justice.vic.gov.au
Basil Stafford <basil.Stafford@elliottstafford.com.au>
Alison May <alison.may@elliottstafford.com.au>
Ref; 20160221-Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to ES&a Your ref LA-05-06- -Re APPEAL-15-2502 Re self-incrimination

Sir/Madam,

15

I view it is essential that Mr Wayne Wall is appropriately warned by lawyers involved that
where he is to take the witness stand he can be cross examined also and he could self-incriminate by his
answers either during examination, cross-examination or any re-examination.
Infringement Act 2006
QUOTE

20

167Offence to give false information

A person must not intentionally provide false or misleading information in any written statement
required by or under this Act.
Penalty:

10 penalty units.

END QUOTE

25

30

35

40

45

In my view this also applies to Mr Wayne Wall!

As Mr Wayne Wall issued defective Fire Prevention Notices (in violation of the legal provisions of the
Country Fire Authority Act 1958) and nevertheless issued an Infringement Notice alleging failure to
comply and this resulted to the Magistrates Court of Victoria (albeit without any evidence to support this
charge) issuing orders adverse to me, then it is my view he could self-incriminate if under oath making
statements. As your correspondence of 10 June 2015 refer to him as Law Officer then clearly it is implied
he is aware of legal provisions and to issue defective notices and base an Infringement Notice upon this to
have it used to achieve a miscarriage of justice I view is a very serious matter. While the Premier still has
not responded to my long overdue FOI Act request as to the extent of Infringement Notices having been
issued in such manner defective, I do anticipate that in the end I will obtain the relevant details.
Mr Wayne Wall employed as a Legal Officer and as such being paid for the job surely can expected to
have a duty of care in his conduct dealing with legal issues. My 20160217-Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to
County Court of Victoria-Re Buloke Shire Council -APPEAL-15-2502-ADDRESS TO THE
COURT-Supplement 2 sets out certain issues and I view that if you have not already done so you ought
to give Mr Wayne Wall appropriate legal advice including that if he were to take the witness stand he
could self-incriminate as the transcript could be used in any charges that may be placed against him.
The High Court of Australia in various judgments on record also sets out what may constitute trespassing,
and as I indicated previously I pursue that Mr Wayne Wall committed trespassing upon my property.
Again, if he takes the witness stand than I can assure you I will pursue this issue also. Where the courts
did strike down police conduct to trespass then surely Mr Wayne Wall cannot be allowed to do so!

This document is not intended and neither must be perceived to refer to all details/issues.
Awaiting your response,

G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O. W. B. (Friends call me Gerrit)

MAY JUSTICE ALWAYS PREVAIL (Our name is our motto!)

p1
21-2-2016
Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: E-mail admin@inspector-rikati.com See also blog Http://www.scribd.com/InspectorRikati