Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Table of Contents
Chapter 1:
Introduction. 3
Conceptual
Framework..5
Statement of the Problem, Hypothesis,
Objectives.6
Scope and
Limitations..11
Sample
Questionnaire.18
Chapter 3:
Methodology...20
Statistical
Treatment.21
Reference
List
23
Chapter 1: Introduction
A.
2007
2008
2009
Feature Phones
5,892.5 6,363.9 6,554.8
Smartphones
445.9
637.6
931.0
Mobile Phones
6,338.4 7,001.5 7,485.7
Source: Euromonitor International from official
2010
6,620.3
1,489.5
8,109.9
statistics,
2011
2012
6,673.3 6,706.7
2,040.6 2,632.4
8,713.9 9,339.1
trade
2011/12
2007-12 CAGR
2007/12 Total
0.5
29.0
7.2
2.6
42.6
8.1
13.8
490.4
47.3
Filipinos are highly engaged with their mobile phones. Many upper/middleincome and affluent consumers own multiple handsets due to the differing
coverage of service providers and a preference for separating their
Company
Corp
Nokia Philippines Inc
Cosmic Technologies Inc
LG Electronics Philippines Inc
Apple Inc
Sony Philippines Inc
HTC Corp
Research in Motion Ltd
Huawei Technologies Philippines
Huawei
Motorola
Sony
Inc
Motorola Philippines Inc
Ericsson
Others
2.9
0.5
1.1
1.3
0.1
17.2 12.2
5.6
5.1
8.4 12.7 19.3
100. 100. 100. 100.
Total
Total
0
0
Source: Euromonitor International from official statistics, trade
B.
Conceptual Framework
1. Duration of
Information Search
2. Pre-purchase
evaluation.
3. Post-Purchase
Evaluation:
Expression of
Satisfaction and
Dissatisfaction
Differences in
the decision
making process
corresponding
to an
individual's
attitude in
buying
smartphones.
Process
Input
Use of Kotler's
(2000) consumer
decision making
process as a
framework for
assessing the
respondent's
decision making
process.
Assessment of
possible influences
of corresponding
attitude on the
decision making
process focusing on:
Output
Categorization of
Individual
Consumer into
the (2) attitude
types according
to Carl Jung:
Extroverted
Attitude
and
Introverted
Attitude.
D.
Objectives
smartphones
Differences in the means of acquiring information on smartphones
Differences in the expression of post-purchase evaluation
Attitude
Strong
ly
Disagr
ee
Disagr
ee
Neutra
l
Agre
e
Strong
ly
Agree
1. I usually spend
my free time
participating in
social gatherings
2. I spend most of
my time with my
friends and/or
family.
3. When I have a
problem I usually
share it with my
Friends and/or
family.
4. I base my
decisions from
facts alone.
5. I enjoy meeting
new
people.
II. Consumer
Behaviour
1. I usually
Strongl
y
Disagre
e
Disagre
e
Neutr
al
Agree
Strong
ly
Agree
2. I tend to spend
a lot of time in
researching
about the
smartphone
Im about to buy.
3. I usually wait
for reviews before
I purchase a
smartphone.
4. When shopping
for smartphones, I
usually prioritize
phone
specifications and
its features over
anything else.
5. I prefer online
sources,
newspapers
and/or magazines
such as
smartphone
review websites
over
recommendations
of family and
friends.
6. I tend to buy
from the same
smartphone
10
8. Whenever Im
satisfied with a
smartphone that I
bought, I actively
share my
experiences with
my friends and/or
family.
9. Whenever Im
dissatisfied with a
smartphone that I
bought, I actively
share my
experiences with
my friends and/or
family.
10.Whenever Im
satisfied with my
phone, I actively
encourage my
friends and/or
family in buying it.
11. Whenever Im
dissatisfied with
my phone, I
actively
discourage my
friends and/or
family in buying it.
11
12
13
14
Limitation
The study will only be focusing on attitude as a factor influencing the
decision making process. Factors such as social, economic and/or
geographic considerations will not be covered. Other limitations to study
are as follows:
1. Sales Promotions
When a consumer is in the Pre-purchase evaluation there is a
tendency not to proceed to the actual purchase due when there will
be gadgets that are on Sale. They would rather purchase the items
with a lower price than the original product that they want from the
start.
2. Trend and the fast-paced industry
While an individual is in the stage of information search and trying
to compare similar products, there would come a time that a new
model will be released with much higher features. This will include
confusion to the consumers mind and might result to second
thoughts.
3. Brand consciousness
People nowadays are becoming more brand conscious to show their
social status. If they can afford high-end products, they will actually
purchase it.
G.
Gone are the days when the use of mobile phones was confined to
sending text messages, making a call, and having polyphonic tones.
In this day and age, where competition is pronounced by introducing
smartphone as type of mobile phone in their business. Players find
ways more than one to stay in shape and be more profitable despite
the blooming effects of global economic crisis and the maturing
mobile market.
Marketing Field
15
16
Problem
Recognitio
n
Informatio
n Search
PrePurchase
Evaluation
Purchase
PostPurchase
Evaluation
Source: Adapted from Kotler, P., 2000, Marketing Managmenet, Millennium edition, New
Jersey, USA.: Prentice-Hall, p.179
17
18
19
these individual interact with the environment they live in. Though it is
also important to note that though individuals can be categorized into two
attitude types, Jung (1971) also mentions that no one lives completely as
one type or the other. As an individual matures or encounters different
environments, he or she may shift towards the other attitude type.
Jung (1971) defined an Extroverted attitude as a standpoint is
characterized by an outward flowing of personal energy, thus an interest
in people, a relationship with these people and dependence on them as
well. Extroverts are usually motivated by outside factors and greatly
influenced by the environment, sociable and confident in unfamiliar
surroundings, less cautious, less fearful, and likes organizations, parties
and tends to be optimistic and enthusiastic. Usual weaknesses of
extroverts are their dependence on making a good impression, easily
making and breaking relationships, regards reflection as being morbid and
tries to avoid being alone, lacks self criticism and too accepting of morals
and conventions. As such extroverts likes to express themselves
outwardly and often times are good at social interactions, though their
heavy reliance on social acceptance creates their weakness as well.
Introverted Attitude on the other hand, according to Jung (1971), is
characterized by an inward flow of personal energy; a withdrawal
concentrating on subjective factors. Introverts are usually happy alone
with rich imagination. They prefer personal reflections over activities
involving social interactions. Because of this, introverts lack confidence in
socializing with people and has the tendency to be shy and hesitant in
conversing. Though this is the case, introverts are able to support
themselves even without social approval.
Jung (1971) says each type misjudges the other; they tend to notice the
negative aspects of the other. The introvert is seen as egotistical, dull, and
self-centered; the extrovert is seen as superficial and insincere. He also
says that there is a marked tendency for either type to marry its opposite,
each secretly hopes that the other will take care of the side of the life
each lacks. To explore further the differences and interactions between
the two, Jung (1971) provided the following instances:
Extroverted Thinking
Extroverts use thought in making decisions; they are tied to facts, and do
not pursue abstract ideas. They tend to supress facts that do not fit into
their schemes, for example individuals such as empirical scientists or
trivia buffs.
20
Introverted Thinking
Introverts are not interested in facts per se but are interested in abstract
ideas. Facts are not collected for their own value. Introverted thinkers give
little attention to their relationship with the world. Examples of such
individuals are mathematicians and philosophers.
Given that Jungs (1971) Attitude Types states that an individuals attitude
can influence a persons way thinking as well as social interaction, the
study is interested in identifying the potential influences of these attitude
types on the consumer decision making process as it was stated by
Perrault et. al (2012) that psychological variables can affect the process.
The method established for information access and evaluation by subject
allowed for the determination of their processing mode, the number of
attributes and brands evaluated, the total amount of information
processed, and the total time required to arrive at a final selection.
21
22
Synthesis
Consumers attitude can influence a specific behaviour of an individual;
they could either be introvert type or extrovert type. Thus, it can be an
expression of satisfaction and dissatisfaction on purchasing a
smartphones. The approach of this study will determine how different
types of attitude can affect in the consumers buying behaviour towards a
certain product. The criteria on Jungs attitude types can be tested by this
research. There are several judgement that a consumer can form and
many decisions they can take. Understanding consumer judgment toward
a certain product is an important role in their decision making process.
Although psychological variables have been investigated, this study would
like to focus on examining if there is an existing relationship between
attitude type and consumer decision making process, considering that
psychological variables indeed influences consumer decision making
(Perner, 2008; Perrault, et al.,2012; Tajzadeh Namin, et. al, 2012; Tillman,
2012). This research specifically aims to examine and determine whether
the attitude type according to Carl Jung (1971) of a consumer, influences
the decision making process for a homogenous shopping product such as
a smartphone.
23
Chapter 3: Methodology
Research Design:
The research is a cause and effect research examining the impact of two
types of attitudes according to Carl Jung towards the consumer decision
making process. Data will be gathered using a close ended questionnaire
using the Likert Scale.
The first section of the questionnaire (See sample questionnaire, pp. 7-8)
will be used in determining the respondents attitude type whether
introvert or extrovert. This will help conclude the type of consumer that
should be targeted by the marketers or sellers.
The second section is constructed to measure the respondents usual
decision making process when purchasing smartphones using Kotlers
(2000) decision making process framework, focusing on the respondents
duration of information search, pre-purchase evaluation of smartphones,
and expression on satisfaction or dissatisfaction in examining the postpurchase behaviour.
Sampling
The Sampling process should start by defining the population concern in
the research. Respondents of this research will be determined by Male and
Female both in working class, Ages 21-40years old, with Economic class A
and upper B, Lives within Metro Manila. The method that will be used is
Probability Sampling Scheme; the method is one in which every unit in our
chosen respondents will have a chance of being selected in the sample.
Probability Sampling Method can accurately determined our respondents
attitude towards purchasing smartphones.
The research will use Simple Random Sampling. In Simple Random
Sampling all subsets of the frame are given an equal probability. Each of
the frames has an equal probability of selection. It can also provide the
greatest number of possible samples by assigning a number to each unit
in the sampling frame. Estimates are easy to calculate by using Simple
Random Sampling.
After determining the process needed for the Researchs Sampling. The
researcher will create a Sampling Frame, or a set of items or events
possible to measure. Determining the sample size must be observe to
limit the number of respondents in the sampling. After getting the Sample
Size, the Researcher should implement the sampling plan needed in the
24
research. After gathering all the data, the researcher should review all the
sampling process.
25
References
1. Euromonitor. (2013). Mobile Phones in the Philippines, December
2013. Retrieved February 5, 2013, from Euromonitor Passport
Database.
2. Hawkins, D. I., Best, R. J. & Coney, K. A. 2001. Consumer Behaviour:
Building Marketing Strategy. 8th ed. Boston: Irwin
3. Hill, R. P. (1984). THE IMPACT OF INTERPERSONAL ANXIETY ON
INFORMATION PROCESSING DECISION MAKING: THE CASE OF THE
CONSUMER (MARKETING). (Order No. 8510249, University of
Maryland College Park). ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, , 168168 p. Retrieved from
http://search.proquest.com/docview/303329952?accountid=28547.
(303329952).
4. Jung, Carl G. (1971). Psychological Types. Princeton, New Jersey:
Princeton University Press.
5. Kotler, P., 2000, Marketing Management, Millenium Edition, New
Jersey, USA.: Prentice Hall
6. Lazo,K.M (2013) Filipinos still prefer traditional buying Consumer
Behavior- Philippines Shopping habit, Fiipino. The Manila Times
114(228) p.24
7. Lim, D. (2014) Digital Marketing In The Service Industry. Business
World. Internet Marketing Case Studies. p.S3/5
8. Lysonski, S. & Durvasula, S. (2013) "Consumer decision making
styles in retailing: evolution of mindsets and psychological impacts",
Journal of Consumer Marketing, Vol. 30 Iss: 1, pp.75 - 87
9. Perrault, W., Cannon, J., & McCarthy, E.J. (2012). Essentials of
Marketing: A Marketing Strategy Planning Approach (13th ed.). New
York, NY: McGrawhill
10.
Perner, L. (2008). Consumer Behaviour. Consumer
Psychologist, Retrieved from
26
http://www.consumerpsychologist.com/intro_Consumer_Behavior.ht
ml
11.
Raul Perteirra, Texting : cellphones and Philippine Modernity
(De La Salle University) Cellular telephones systems-Philippines Vol.
197
12.
Simonson, I., & Stephen, M. N. (2000). The role of explanations
and need for uniqueness in consumer decision making:
Unconventional choices based on reasons. Journal of Consumer
Research, 27(1), 49-68. Retrieved from
http://search.proquest.com/docview/215037099?accountid=28547
13.
Tajzadeh Namin, A. A., Rahmani, V. & Tajzadeh Namin,A.
(2012). The Role of Attitudes and Decision Making on Product
Choice. Case Study: Cellular Phones. International Business
Research, 5(5). Retrieved from
http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ibr/article/view/16642/110
93
14.
Tillman, C. J. (2011). Character, conditions, and cognitions:
The role of personality, climate, intensity, and moral disengagement
in the unethical decision-making process. (3461390, The University
of Alabama). ProQuest
Dissertations and Theses, , 128-n/a. Retrieved from
http://search.proquest.com/docview/880288244?accountid=28547.
(880288244).
15.
Valente, C. S (2012) Social Media,Mobile Phones, deter
dictatorships David
Social media.Mobile phones, Smart Phones. The Manila Times
113(349) p.A6
16. Vallecera, J. (2013)Cellphones To Revolutionize PHL Advertising.
Business Mirror p. A8 Smart Phones and Cellphones
17.
Yordanova, G. S. (2006). Effects of the pre-decision stage of
decision making on the self-regulation of behavior. (3232819,
University of Pittsburgh). ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, , 168168 p. Retrieved from
http://search.proquest.com/docview/305248899?accountid=28547.
(305248899).
27