Professional Documents
Culture Documents
SUBMITTED BY
LALAPETA MOHAN
(REG NO: 0920212)
IN PARTIAL FULLFILLMENT FOR THE AWARD OF THE
DEGREE
OF
MASTER OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
BANAGLORE-560 074
APRIL-MAY 2010
DECLARATION
I, LALAPETA MOHAN Student of MBA I (Finance) 2009-2011
studying at Christ University Institute of Management, Bangalore, declare that the
project work entitled A STUDY ON WORKING CAPITAL MANAGEMENT
OF ASHOK LEYLAND LTD. CHENNAI Was carried by me in the partial
fulfillment of MBA program under the Christ university institute of
management.
(LALAPETA MOHAN)
SIGNATURE OF THE STUDENT
CHRIST UNIVERSITY INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT
BANAGALORE
PLACE: - BANGALORE.
DATE:
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
TABLE OF CONTENTS:
CHAPTER
NUMBER
TITLE
PAGE
NUMBER
LIST OF TABLES
LIST OF CHARTS
SYNOPSIS
1. The Background
2. The Problem Statement
3. Objectives Of The Study
4. Method
5. Scope Of The Study
6. Limitations Of The Study
7. Chapter Scheme
8. Expectations From Study
6
8
10
11
11
11
12
14
14
14
15
II
16
17
18
18
19
21
25
III
COMPANY PROFILE
1. Introduction
2. Industry & Company Profile
3. History And Origin
4. Vision
5. Mission
6. Values
27
28
29
31
38
39
39
7. Policies
8. Product Profile
IV
VI
40
43
50
51
56
66
83
92
99
101
102
102
103
110
112
116
117
119
120
LIST OF TABLES:
S.NO:
TITLE
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
TABLE
NO:
1
PAGE
NO:
52
53
54
55
56
6
7
8
57
58
60
61
10
11
12
13
14
62
63
64
65
74
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
86
87
88
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
89
90
91
95
96
97
98
99
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
LIST OF CHARTS
S.NO:
TITLE
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
CHART
NO:
1
2
3
PAGE
NO:
57
59
60
61
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
62
63
64
65
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
86
87
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
AVERAGE INVESTMENT IN
RECEIVABLES
CREDITORS TURNOVER RATIO
CREDIT COLLECTION PERIOD
RECEIVABLES TO CA RATIO
CASH TURNOVER RATIO
CASH HOLDING PERIOD
CASH RATIO
CASH TO CA RATIO
OPERATING CYCLE
SALES FORECAST
INVENTORY FORECAST
CASH FORECAST
SUNDRY DEBTORS FORECAST
LOANS AND ADVANCES FORECAST
LIABILITIES FORECAST
PROVISIONS FORECAST
22
88
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
89
90
91
95
96
97
98
100
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
10
CHAPTER 1
Synopsis
1. The
Background
2. The Problem
Statement
3. Objectives Of
The Study
4. Method
5. Scope Of The
Study
6. Limitations Of
The Study
7. Chapter
Scheme
8. Expectations
11
12
To study the optimum level of current assets and current liabilities of the
Company.
To study the liquidity position through various working capital related
Ratios.
To study the working capital components such as receivables accounts, Cash
management, Inventory position.
To study the way and means of working capital finance of the Ashok
Leyland Ltd.
To estimate the working capital requirement of Ashok Leyland Ltd
To study the operating and cash cycle of the company.
1.4. METHOD:
1.4.1 INTRODUCTION:
Research methodology is a way to systematically solve the research
problem. It may be understood as a science of studying now research is
done systematically. In that various steps, those are generally adopted by a
researcher in studying his problem along with the logic behind them.
It is important for research to know not only the research method but
also know methodology. The procedures by which researcher go about their
work of describing, explaining and predicting phenomenon are called
methodology. Methods comprise the procedures used for generating, collecting and
evaluating data. All this means that it is necessary for the researcher to
design his methodology for his problem as the same may differ from problem to
problem. Data collection is important step in any project and success of any
project will be largely depend upon now much accurate you will be able to collect
and how much time, money and effort will be required to collect that necessary
data, this is also important step. Data collection plays an important role in research
work. Without proper data available for analysis you cannot do the research work
accurately.
13
14
15
16
Chapter 2
Working capital
management
1. Introduction
2. Need Of Working
Capital
3. Gross W.C and Net
W.C.
4. Types Of Working
Capital
5. Determinants Of
Working Capital
6. Ratio analysis
17
2.1 INTRODUCTION
18
19
20
The need for current assets arises, as already observed, because of the
cash cycle. To carry on business certain minimum level of working
capital is necessary on continues and uninterrupted basis. For all practical
purpose, this requirement will have to be met permanent as with other
fixed assets. This requirement refers to as permanent or fixed working capital.
2) Temporary Working Capital:
Any amount over and above the permanent level of working capital is
temporary, fluctuating or variable, working capital. This portion of the required
working capital is needed to meet fluctuation in demand consequent upon
changes in production and sales as result of seasonal changes
21
Graph shows that the permanent level is fairly castanet; while temporary
working capital is fluctuating in the case of an expanding firm the permanent
working capital line may not be horizontal. This may be because of changes in
demand for permanent current assets might be increasing to support a rising level
of activity
22
there are some businesses like trading activity, where requirement of fixed
capital is less but more money is blocked in inventories and debtors.
2) Length Of Production Cycle:
In some business like machine tools industry, the time gap between the
acquisition of raw material till the end of final production of finished products
itself is quite high. As such amount may be blocked either in raw
material or work in progress or finished goods or even in debtors. Naturally
there need of working capital is high.
3) Size And Growth Of Business:
In very small company the working capital requirement is quit high due to high
overhead, higher buying and selling cost etc. As such medium size business
positively has edge over the small companies. But if the business start growing
after certain limit, the working capital requirements may adversely affect by the
increasing size.
4) Business/ Trade Cycle:
If the company is the operating in the time of boom, the working
capital requirement may be more as the company may like to buy more raw
material, may increase the production and sales to take the benefit of
favorable market, due to increase in the sales, there may more and more amount
of funds blocked in stock and debtors etc. similarly in the case of
depressions also, working capital may be high as the sales terms of value
and quantity may be reducing, there may be unnecessary piling up of stack
without getting sold, the receivable may not be recovered in time etc.
5) Terms Of Purchase And Sales:
Some time due to competition or custom, it may be necessary for the company
to extend more and more credit to customers, as result which more and
more amount is locked up in debtors or bills receivables which increase the
working capital requirement. On the other hand, in the case of purchase, if the
credit is offered by suppliers of goods and services, a part of working
23
10)
24
11)Credit policy:
A concern that purchases its requirements on credit and sales its product /
services on cash requires lesser amt. of working capital and vice-versa.
12)
Some firms have more earning capacity than other due to quality of their
products, monopoly conditions, etc. Such firms may generate cash profits
from operations and contribute to their working capital. The dividend policy
also affects the requirement of working capital. A firm maintaining a steady
high rate of cash dividend irrespective of its profits needs working capital
than the firm that retains larger part of its profits and does not pay so high
rate of cash dividend.
13)
Changes in the price level also affect the working capital requirements.
Generally rise in prices leads to increase in working capital.
25
Profitability ratios
1. Gross profit ratio=gross profit/net sales*100
2. Net profit ratio=net profit/net sales*100
B. INVENTORY MANAGEMENT RATIOS:
1. Inventory turnover ratio=sales/average inventory
2. Inventory holding period=360/inventory turnover ratio
3. Raw materials turnover ratio= raw materials/average raw materials
4. Raw material holding period=360/RM turnover ratio
5. Work in progress turnover ratio= cost of production/average WIP
(Cost of production=WIP closing stock-WIP opening stock+ depreciation
+ purchases+ employee wages power and fuel +consumption)
6. WIP holding period=360/WIP TR
7. FG turnover ratio=CGS/average FG
8. FG holding period=360/FG TR
26
1. Introduction
2. Industry & Company
CHAPTER 3
Profile
3. History PROFILE
And Origin
COMPANY
4. Vision
5. Mission
6. Values
7. Policies
8. Product Profile
27
3.1 INTRODUCTION:
In 1948, when independent India was one year old, Ashok Leyland was born. We
were Ashok Motors then, assembling Austin cars at the first plant, at Ennore near
Chennai. In 1950 started assembly of Leyland commercial vehicles and soon local
manufacturing under license from British Leyland. With British Leyland
participation in the equity capital, in 1954, the Company was rechristened Ashok
Leyland.
Since then Ashok Leyland has been a major presence in India's commercial vehicle
industry. These years have been punctuated by a number of technological
innovations which went on to become industry standards. This tradition of
28
29
History:
In 1953, the Govt of India and the Indian private sector initiated manufacturing
processes to help develop the automobile industry, which had emerged by the
1940s in a nascent form. Between 1940 to the economic liberalization of 1991, the
automobile industry continued to grow at a slow pace due to the many govt
restrictions. Japanese manufacturers entered the Indian market ultimately leading
to the establishment of Maruti udyog. A number of foreign firms joint ventures
with Indian companies.
Indian Automobile Companies:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Market Share:
Table: 1
COMPANY
MARKET SHARE
30
1.Tata Motors
60.2
28.4
3.Others
11.4
Chart: 1
MARKET SHARE
tata motors
others
11%
28%
60%
31
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Fiat
Ford motors
General motors
Honda
Hyundai
Mercedes-Benz
Mitsubishi motors
(Source: www.ashokleyland.com)
Spread over 135 acres, Ashok Leyland Ennore is a highly integrated Mother Plant
accounting for
over 40% ALL production. The plant manufactures a wide range
of vehicles and house production facilities for important aggregates such as
Engines, Gear Box, Axles and other key in-house components. Number of
employees in ennore plant are 4146 and number of models manufactured are 132.
Ashok Leyland is the flagship company of the hinduja group and is the second
largest manufacturer of commercial vehicles in India.
32
Ashok motor was set up in 1948 for the assembly of Austin cars. The company
name and objective changed with equity participation by British Leyland and
Ashok Leyland commenced manufacturer of commercial vehicles in 1955. It has
since than grown as a reputed manufacturer of quality automotive products ranging
from light commercial vehicles to heavy duty vehicles and for automotive,
industrial and marine applications. In 1987, the overseas hold by Land Rover
Leyland International Holidays Ltd(LRLIH) was taken over by a joint venture
between the Hinduja group, Non-Resident Indian Transitional group and IVECO
(since July 2006,the Hinduja group is 100% stake holder of LRLIH). Ashok
Leyland also acquired truck business unit of Avia, Prague (Czech Republic
effective 19-10-06).
The products of the company are of proven design for durability and reliability and
are hence very popular both in Indian and overseas markets. In recent years the
product range is upgraded in to the latest technological development in the world,
for which the company has the technical support from IVECO (FIAT group),
Italy for manufacture of IVECO cargo range of vehicles; Hino Motors, Japan for
manufacture of fuel efficient engines; and ZF , Germany for manufacture of
synchromesh gear boxes.
In the journey towards the Global standard of Quality , Ashok Leyland has reached
a major milestone in 1993 , when it became the first in Indias automobile industry
to win ISO 9002 Certification. The more comprehensive ISO 9001 certification
came in 1994, QS 9000 in 1998 and ISO 14001 certification for all vehicle
manufacturing units in 2002. It has also become the first Indian automobile
company to receive the latest ISO/TS 16949 corporate certification which is
specific to the auto company.
The company has the corporate office register at Chennai.
The marketing headquarter is at Chennai and the sales and services network, dealer
network and spare parts warehouse spread throughout India with regional sales
office and services centre located in all major cities and towns in the country. The
products are also exported to a range of overseas countries.
The marketing personal maintain constant interaction with customers for
application development and feedback for continuous improvement of the
33
products. The services function is carried out by qualified personal whose skills are
continuously upgraded through training to meet the servicing requirements of
newer or improved products. The design function is carried out by the product
Development Division operating through 4 centres viz. Product Development
(Ennore) for R&D related to Ashok Leyland engines, Technical centre
vellivoyalchavadi for design, proto-type developments of vehicle, vehicles and
components testing; Engine R&D (Hosur) for design and development of Hino
engines and Advanced Engineering (Chennai) for research related to future
products.
The manufacturing units of the company are located at Ennore (TN), Hosur
(TN), Alwar (Rajasthan) and Bhandara (MR). The Ennore , Hosur (plant - 1),
Hosur (plant-ii), Ambattur , Alwar and Bhandara manufacturing units are certified
ISO 9001:2000 and QS 9000:1998 certification by Indian register Quality system.
The company is also certified to ISO 14001:2000 Environmental Management
System for all the manufacturing units. The Bhandara unit of the company has won
the Golden Peacock Environmental Award 2002 of the world Environmental
Foundation in the Large/manufacturing category.
Ashok Leyland is also the 1st auto mobile company to receive the ISO/TS 16949
corporate certification in June 2006. TS 16949 reckon the nuances of automobile
Industry and is more customer centric. It integrates the salient concepts of all the
QMS standards has been accepted recognized and followed by all automobiles
manufactures in USA , Europe and Asia.
Ashok Leyland has also obtained ISO 27001 certificates for its Ennore Data canter
and Advanced Engineering group located in Chennai. Ennore data centre obtained
the certificate in May 2005 and advanced engineering in April 2007.
HISTORY AND ORIGIN:
The origin of Ashok Leyland can be traced to the urge for self-reliance, felt by
independent India. Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru, India's first Prime Minister
persuaded Mr. Raghunandan Saran, an industrialist, to enter automotive
manufacture. In 1948, Ashok Motors was set up in what was then Madras, for the
assembly of Austin Cars. The Company's destiny and name changed soon with
34
(Source: www.ashokleyland.com)
Since then Ashok Leyland has been a major presence in India's commercial vehicle
industry with a tradition of technological leadership, achieved through tie-ups
with international technology leaders and through vigorous in-house R&D.
Access to international technology enabled the Company to set a tradition to be
first with technology. Be it full air brakes, power steering or rear engine busses,
Ashok Leyland pioneered all these concepts. Responding to the operating
conditions and practices in the country, the Company made its vehicles strong,
over-engineering them with extra metallic muscles. "Designing durable products
that make economic sense to the consumer, using appropriate technology", became
the design philosophy of the Company, which in turn has moulded consumer
attitudes and the brand personality.
The Company was incorporated on 7th September 1948, at Chennai. At first, they
Manufacture Comet Chassis and Leyland Tiger and Titan Chassis and Leyland
Diesel Engines. In July 1955, the name of the Company Was changed from Ashok
Motors Ltd., to Ashok Leyland Ltd.
35
36
37
Leylands Ennore unit has received ISO 14001 certification for its environment
management system from Indian Registrar Quality Systems.
In 2002, Ashok Leyland Ltd has informed that Mr. G. Boschetti ceased to be a
Director on our Board. Mr. Marc Petit also ceased to be an Alternate Director to
Mr. G Boschetti Mr. R Sorce has been appointed as a Director in the place of Mr.
G Boschetti
In 2003, Leyland has reported a 70% increase in its sales. Ashok Leyland set to
increase HINO engine platform through in-house product development, to
deliver higher horsepower in tune with improving road infrastructure. Ashok
Leyland Ltd has supplied 25 buses to Afghanistan which is a part of Indian
Governments Assistance to the war-ravaged Afghanistan. Leyland bagged $46
million truck supply contract from the United Nations.
In 2004, Ashok Leyland unveils new range of buses and trucks in a bid. It launches
Ecomet, a light commercial vehicle, in the Andhra Pradesh market. Ashok
Leylands Hosur unit bags CIIs awards in safety, health and environment. Ashok
Leyland Ltd (ALL) and Indian Oil Corporation (IOC) have joined hands to offer
freight management services across the country. Ashok Leyland Ltd signs a
collaboration agreement with ZF of Germany local manufacturing of ZFs 9-speed
synchromesh gearbox. Now, Wipro InfoTech has signed up with Ashok Leyland
for strategic cost reduction.
Ashok Leyland vehicles have built a reputation for reliability and ruggedness.
The 5, 00,000 vehicles we have put on the roads have considerably eased the
additional pressure placed on road transportation in independent India.
In the populous Indian metros, four out of the five State Transport Undertaking
(STU) buses come from Ashok Leyland. Some of them like the double-decker and
vestibule buses are unique models from Ashok Leyland, tailor-made for highdensity routes.
In 1987, the overseas holding by Land Rover Leyland International Holdings
Limited (LRLIH) was taken over by a joint venture between the Hinduja Group,
38
the Non-Resident Indian transnational group and IVECO. (Since July 2006, the
Hinduja Group is 100% holder of LRLIH).
The blueprint prepared for the future reflected the global ambitions of the
company, captured in four words: Global Standards, Global Markets. This was at a
time when liberalisation and globalisation were not yet in the air. Ashok Leyland
embarked on a major product and process up gradation to match world-class
standards of technology.
In the journey towards global standards of quality, Ashok Leyland reached a major
milestone in 1993 when it became the first in India's automobile history to win
the ISO 9002 certification. The more comprehensive ISO 9001 certification came
in 1994, QS 9000 in 1998 and ISO 14001 certification for all vehicle
manufacturing units in 2002. It has also become the first Indian auto company to
receive the latest ISO/TS 16949 Corporate Certification (in July 2006) which is
specific to the auto industry.
3.4 VISION:
Achieving leadership in the medium/heavy duty segments of the domestic
commercial vehicle market and a significant presence in the world market through
transport solutions that best anticipate customer needs, with the highest value to
cost.
Be among the top Indian corporations acknowledged nationally and internationally
for
Excellence in quality of its products.
Excellence in customer focus and service.
3.5 MISSION:
39
3.6 VALUES:
1. CUSTUMERS:
We value our customers and will constantly endeavour to fulfil their needs by
proactivity offering them products and service appropriate to their diverse
applications.
2. EMPLOYEE:
We consider our employee as our most valuable asset and are committed to provide
full encouragement and support to them to enhance their potential and contribution
to the companys business.
3. VENDORS:
Our vendors are our valued partners in our business development and we will work
with them in a spirit of mutual co-operation to meet our business objectives.
4. DISTRIBUTERS:
Our distributers are the vital between the company and the customers and we are
committed to advice and support our distributers to continuously upgrade their
infrastructure, skills and capability to serve our customers better.
5. SHAREHOLDERS:
40
41
ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY:
We at ashok Leyland committed personal environmental measures.
1. We follow all legal reasons.
2. Adopt pollution prevent technology in design and manufacturing projects.
3. Conserve all resources such as power, water, oil, gas, compressed air etc...,
and optimise their usage through scientific methods.
4. Provide clean working environment to employees.
5. Set and review objectives and targets for continually improving
environment.
The Operation and Objectives of the Company are following below:To carry on the Business of manufacturers, assemblers of, dealers in, hirers,
repairers ,cleaners, stores, warehouses, pf motor cars, motor cycles, cycle-cars,
motors, scooters, motor-buses and lorries, trucks, tractors, cycles, bicycles, and
carriages, launches, boats and ships, vans aero planes, hydroplanes, and other
vehicles and conveyances of all descriptions for carrying passengers or other
personnel, goods, commodities, produce, cargoes and other things on land or sea or
by air whether propelled or assisted by means of petrol, spirit, steam, gas,
electrical, animal or other powers, and all engines, chassis, bodies, turbines, tanks,
42
tools, implements, accessories and other things, materials and products used for, in
or in connection with motors and other things. To Buy, sell, let on, hire, repair,
alter and deal in machinery, component parts, accessories and fittings of all kinds
for motors and other things and all articles and things referred to in the above item
hereof or used in or capable of being used in connection with the manufacture,
maintenance and working thereof.
To carry on the business of garage-keepers and suppliers of and dealers in petrol,
electricity and other motive power to motors and other things.
To develop, design, programme, conduct feasibility studies, act as advisor,
retainers, consultants and / or agents to all projects and to engage in project survey,
implementation, progress monitoring and turnkey installation.
To promote any other Company for the purpose of acquiring all or any of the
property and liabilities of this Company of for any other purpose which may seem
directly or indirectly calculated to benefit this Company and to buy, sell, contract
to buy or sell and deal in shares, stocks, debentures and securities of all kinds.
To invest or deposit or deal with the moneys of the Company not immediately
required for the purposes of its business in such manner as may from time to time
be determined.
To guarantee the performance of contracts.
To establish agencies or branches in India or elsewhere and to undertake the
management of any Company or Companies having objects altogether or in part
similar to those of this Company and to take all necessary steps for registering the
Company in any Country as may be thought fit.
To improve, manage, work, develop, lease, mortgage, abandon or otherwise deal
with, all or any part of the part of the property movable or immovable of the
Company and all or any of the rights and concession of the Company
The Company to do all or any of the above things in any part of the world as
43
PRODUCT PROFILE:
1. Buses
2. Trucks
3. Engines
4. Defence & Special Vehicles
1. BUSES:
44
Leaders in the Indian bus market, offering unique models such as CNG, Double
Decker and Vestibule bus.
S.N
O
1.
PRODUC
T
FIGURE
S.N
O
2.
Viking
BS - III
Viking BS
- II
3.
PRODUC
T
4.
Viking BS
II
5.
Viking
SLF BSIII
6.
Viking
CNG BSIII
7.
12 M Bus
- BS II
8.
Cheetah
BS II
9.
12 M Bus
BS-II
10.
Cheetah
BS - II
Panther
BS II
FIGURE
45
11.
12.
Lynx BSII
13.
Vestibule
Bus
BSIII
14.
Airport
Tarmac
coach
Double
Decker
15.
16.
Stag BS II
Cheetah
BS - II
2. TRUCKS:
Pioneers in multi axle trucks and tractor-trailers.
S.NO PRODUCT
.
1.
4 X 2 Haulage Models
FIGURE
46
2.
4 X 2 and Multi-axle
Tippers
3.
Multi-axle Vehicles
4.
Tractors
5.
Ecomet
3. ENGINES:
Diesel engines for Industrial, Genset and Marine applications, in collaboration with
technology leaders.
Engine Dealerships:
S.N
O
PRODUCT
FIGURE
APPLICATIONS
47
1.
Genset
Application
2.
Industrial
Application
48
3.
Marine
Application
DG Sets for
exports
4.
49
S.N
O
1.
PRODUCT
FIGURE
Special Vehicles
2.
Defence Vehicles
Chapter 4
50
4D
2M13A
EN3IOWY
ICEPOA
BWSOERI
SRHMK
MNAT
NCAGT
EINMC
NAG
GCP
EYT
MCA
EL
TE
.
.
S C.
N
N
VN
N
A
N
NA
L
I KP
A
I A
M
T
I
2
A R
V
I E G S
A G
TD
R
OT
E Y
E
A
RI
GA A
T
I
AE
PG
AE
EL
T
E
O
51
time. The liquidity position of the firm is totally effected by the management of
working capital. So, a study of changes in the uses and sources of working capital
is necessary to evaluate the efficiency with which the working capital is employed
in a business. This involves the need for working capital analysis.
(Rs. IN MILLIONS)
52
PARTICULARS
2004
2005
INCREASE DECREASE
inventories
5069.41
5680.81
611.4
nil
sundry debtors
4056.19
4587.66
531.47
nil
3249.74
7966.82
4717.08
nil
2261.33
3337.34
1076.01
nil
(A)
14636.67
21572.63
CURRENT
LIABILITIES
liabilities
6856.71
9611.87
nil
2755.16
provisions
1470.31
2044.8
nil
574.49
(B)
8327.02
11656.67
CURRENT
ASSETS
(A-B)
6309.65
9915.96
WORKING
CAPITAL
increasing in WC 3606.31
TOTAL
9915.96
9915.96
6935.96
SOURCE: ANNUAL REPORTS OF COMPANY
3606.31
6935.96
INFERENCE:
1. The above table shows that there has been increase in need for working
capital to the extent of 3606.31 from the year 2004to 2005.
FOR THE YEAR 2005-2006:
TABLE 2
(Rs. IN MILLIONS)
53
particulars
2005
2006
increase
decrease
inventories
5680.81
9025.61
3344.8
sundry debtors
4587.66
4243.37
344.29
7966.82
6028.76
1938.06
3337.34
3026.39
310.95
(A)
21572.63
22324.13
CURRENT
LIABILITIES
liabilities
9611.87
11468.95
1857.08
provisions
2044.8
2616.21
571.41
(B)
11656.67
14085.16
current assets
1676.99
5021.79
5021.79
INFERENCE:
1. The above table shows that there has been decrease in the working capital to
the extent of 1676.99 from the year 2005to 2006.
54
(Rs. IN MILLIONS)
PARTICULARS
2006
2007
INCREASE
9025.61
4243.37
6028.76
10703.21
5228.75
4349.39
1677.6
985.38
3026.39
22324.13
6695.79
26977.14
3669.4
liabilities
provisions
(B)
11468.95
2616.21
14085.16
16516.25
1042.3
17558.55
(A-B) WORKING
CAPITAL
8238.97
9418.59
CURRENT
ASSETS
inventories
sundry debtors
cash and bank
balances
loan & advances
(A)
DECREASE
1679.37
CURRENT
LIABILITIES
5047.3
1573.91
increasing in WC
1179.62
TOTAL
9418.59
9418.59
7906.29
SOURCE: ANNUAL REPORTS OF COMPANY
1179.62
7906.29
INFERENCE:
1. The above table shows that there has been increase in need for working
capital to the extent of 1179.62 from the year 2006 to 2007.
FOR THE YEAR 2007-2008:
TABLE 4:
55
(Rs. IN MILLIONS)
PARTICULARS
CURRENT
ASSETS
inventories
sundry debtors
cash and bank
balances
loan & advances
(A)
CURRENT
LIABILITIES
liabilities
provisions
(B)
2007
2008
INCREAS
E
10703.21
5228.75
4349.39
12239.14
3758.35
4513.7
1535.93
6695.79
26977.14
8241.385
28752.581
1545.595
16516.25
1042.3
17558.55
19267.084
3452.31
22719.394
DECREASE
1470.4
164.31
2750.834
2410.01
3385.4
6631.235
6631.235
INFERENCE:
1. The above table shows that there has been decrease in need for working
capital to the extent of 3385.40 from the year 2007to 2008.
FOR THE YEAR 2008-09
TABLE- 5
(Rs. IN MILLIONS)
56
PARTICULARS
2008
2009
INCREASE
12239.14
3758.35
4513.7
13300.144
9579.742
880.836
1061
5821.391
8241.385
28752.581
7895.44
31656.14
liabilities
provisions
(B)
19267.084
3452.31
22719.394
18688.641
2680.82
21369.461
(A-B) WORKING
CAPITAL
6033.19
10286.679
CURRENT
ASSETS
inventories
sundry debtors
cash and bank
balances
loan & advances
(A)
DECREASE
3632.865
346.25
CURRENT
LIABILITIES
5784.43
771.49
increasing in WC
4253.5
TOTAL
10286.68
10286.68
8232.32
SOURCE: ANNUAL REPORTS OF COMPANY
4253.5
8232.32
INFERENCE:
1. The above table shows that there has been increase in need for working
capital to the extent of 4253.50 from the year 2008 to 2009.
57
CURRENT
CURRENT
ASSETS
LIABILITIES
2004-05 21,572.63
11,656.67
2005-06 22,324.13
14,085.16
2006-07 26,977.14
17,558.55
2007-08 28,752.58
22,719.39
2008-09 31,656.16
21,369.46
SOURCE: ANNUAL REPORTS OF COMPANY
NET.WORKING
CAPITAL
9,915.96
8,238.97
9,418.59
6,033.19
10,286.70
CHART: 1
12,000.00
10,000.00
8,000.00
6,000.00
9,915.96
8,238.97
10,286.70
9,418.59
4,000.00
6,033.19
2,000.00
0.00
2004-05
2005-06
2006-07
NET.WORKING CAPITAL
INTERPRETATION:
2007-08
2008-09
58
TABLE: 7
(Rs. IN MILLIONS)
YEAR
SALES
41,818.97
NET.WORKING
CAPITAL
9,915.96
TURN OVER
RATIO
4.22
2004-05
2005-06
52,476.57
8,238.97
6.37
2006-07
71,681.76
9,418.59
7.61
2007-08
77,425.80
6,033.19
12.83
2008-09
59,810.74
10,286.70
5.81
CHART: 2
59
12.83
12.00
10.00
7.61
8.00
6.37
5.81
6.00
4.22
4.00
2.00
0.00
2004-05
2005-06
2006-07
2007-08
2008-09
INTERPRETATAION:
1. The working capital turnover ratio of Ashok Leyland Ltd is increasing from
200-05 to 2007-08. But suddenly there is a dip in 2008-09.
2. In the year 2007-08, the performance of Ashok Leyland Ltd is in peak
position.
3. In the year 2008-09 Indian automobile industry was slowed down due to
market slowdown.
II. TO STUDY THE STRUCTURE OF WC:
60
CURRENT
TOTAL
CA/TA
ASSETS
ASSETS
RATIO
2004-05
21572.63
33654.54
0.64
2005-06
22324.13
36852.79
0.61
2006-07
26977.14
44632.32
0.60
2007-08
28752.58
55399.53
0.52
2008-09
31656.16
78265.8
0.40
SOURCE: ANNUAL REPORTS OF COMPANY
CHART: 3
0.40
2008-09
0.52
2007-08
2006-07
0.60
2005-06
0.61
0.64
2004-05
0.00
0.10
0.20
0.30
0.40
0.50
0.60
CA/TA RATIO
INTERPRETATION:
1. This CA to TA ratio is in tending of reducing.
2. In 2004-05 it is highest and in 2008-09 it is lowest.
3. The portion of current assets is reducing year by year.
0.70
61
TABLE: 9
(Rs. IN MILLIONS)
YEAR
CURRENT
LIABILITIES
TOTAL
LIABILITIES
2004-05
11656.67
33847.86
2005-06
14085.16
36925.86
2006-07
17558.55
44877.5
2007-08
22719.39
55622.43
2008-09
21369.46
78362.67
SOURCE: ANNUAL REPORTS OF COMPANY
CL/TL
RATIO
0.34
0.38
0.39
0.41
0.27
CHART: 4
0.45
0.40
0.35
0.30
0.25
0.20
0.38
0.34
0.39
0.41
0.27
0.15
0.10
0.05
0.00
2004-05
2005-06
2006-07
2007-08
CL/TL RATIO
INTERPRETATION:
1.
2.
3.
4.
2008-09
62
CURRENT
ASSETS
CURRENT
LIABILITIES
RATIO
INDUSTRY
AVERAGE
2004-05 21572.63
11656.67
1.85
2005-06 22324.13
14085.16
1.58
2006-07 26974.14
17558.55
1.54
2007-08 28752.58
22719.39
1.27
2008-09 31656.16
21369.46
1.48
SOURCE: ANNUAL REPORTS OF COMPANY
1.55
1.55
1.55
1.55
1.55
CHART: 5
2.00
1.80
1.60
1.40
1.20
1.00
0.80
0.60
0.40
0.20
0.00
1.85
1.55
1.58 1.55
1.54 1.55
1.55
1.48 1.55
1.27
2004-05
2005-06
RATIO
2006-07
2007-08
2008-09
INDUSTRY AVERAGE
INTERPRETATION:
1. Here industry ratio is 1.55.
2. Except in 2007-08 remaining all years companys current ratio is almost
near to industry average ratio.
3. In the year 2006-07 company had power to affect the industry.
63
6. LIQUID RATIO:
TABLE: 11
(Rs. IN MILLIONS)
YEAR
QUICK
ASSETS
CURRENT
LIABILITIES
RATIO
2004-05 15891.82
11656.67
1.36
2005-06 13298.52
14085.16
0.94
2006-07 16270.93
17558.55
0.93
2007-08 16513.436
22719.39
0.73
2008-09 18356.016
21369.46
0.86
SOURCE: ANNUAL REPORTS OF COMPANY
INDUSTRY
AVERAGE
1.07
1.07
1.07
1.07
1.07
CHART: 6
1.60
1.40
1.20
1.36
1.07
1.07
0.94
1.00
1.07
1.07
0.93
1.07
0.86
0.73
0.80
0.60
0.40
0.20
0.00
2004-05
2005-06
RATIO
2006-07
2007-08
2008-09
INDUSTRY AVERAGE
INFERENCE:
1. Here industry ratio is 1.07
2. In 2004-05 it is higher and then started to decline slowly up to 2007-08.
3. In 2008-09 it started increasing and came near to the industry average.
64
(Rs. IN MILLIONS)
GROSS PROFIT
SALES
GROSS PROFIT
RATIO
12.69
3.25
12.71
11.68
11.46
2004-05
5,307.99
41,818.97
2005-06
1,705.45
52,476.57
2006-07
9,108.21
71,681.76
2007-08
9,043.22
77,425.80
2008-09
6,855.41
59,810.74
SOURCE: ANNUAL REPORTS OF COMPANY
CHART: 7
11.68
12.69
11.46
12.71
10.00
8.00
6.00
4.00
2.00
0.00
2004-05
3.25
2005-06
2006-07
2007-08
2008-09
INFERENCE:
From the table shown above gross profit of the firm is satisfactory in all the
years except in 2005-06.
But it was recovered very soon by next year and it is still doing well.
65
NET PROFIT
SALES
NET PROFIT
RATIO
6.49
6.24
6.16
6.06
3.18
2004-05
2,714.10
41,818.97
2005-06
3,273.20
52,476.57
2006-07
4,412.86
71,681.76
2007-08
4,693.10
77,425.80
2008-09
1,899.96
59,810.74
SOURCE: ANNUAL REPORTS OF COMPANY
CHART:8
6.49
6.24
6.16
6.06
5.00
4.00
3.18
3.00
2.00
1.00
0.00
2004-05
2005-06
2006-07
2007-08
2008-09
INFERENCE:
From the data given in the above table it is clear that the net profit of the
company is almost maintained constant except in the year 2008-09.
Due to market slow down the net profit of the company effected.
66
67
68
Although holding of a more and more inventory may be desirable from the
point of view of functional managers, it affects adversely short-term
liquidity.
It involves many types of costs associated with it viz... Acquisition cost,
carrying cost, short cost, etc
It is the only item of current assets, which has direct influence on the prices,
and income of a firm.
Motives of inventory:
Ashok Leyland ltd holds inventory to achieve the following 3 motives.
Transaction motives:
It emphasizes the Ashok Leyland ltds need to maintain
inventories to facilitate smooth production and sales operations.
Precautionary motive:
It necessities the ALLs need to maintain inventories to guard
against the risk of unpredictable changes in demand and supply forces and
other conditions.
Speculative motive:
It influences the decision to increase or decrease inventory levels
in Ashok Leyland ltd to take advantage of price fluctuations.
Objectives of inventory management:
There should be optimal levels of investment for any asset, whether it is plant,
cash or inventories. Again, inadequate inventories will disrupt production and loss
sales. All this calls for an effective inventory program.
The main adjectives are:
1) To ensure that materials are available for use in production and
production services, as and when required.
2) To ensure that finished goods and available for delivery to customers to
fulfill orders.
3) To minimize investments in inventories to maximize profitability.
4) To protect the inventory against deterioration, obsolescence and
unauthorized use.
5) To enable the management to make costs and consumptions between
operations and periods.
69
70
Category
A
% in value
% in quantity
70-80%
5-10%
10-20%
10-20%
5-10%
70-80%
In Ashok Leyland:
Category
% in value
% in quantity
75.5%
8%
15%
12%
7.5%
72.2%
3. FSN analysis:
In Ashok Leyland according to FSN analysis the items are categorized as
follows:
1. 0-1 = Non Moving
2. 1-3 = Crawling
3. 3-6 = Slow Moving
4. 6-9 = Moderate Fast Moving
5. 9-12 = Fast Moving
4. Determination of economic order quantity (EOQ):
Determination of quantity for which the order should be placed is one of the
important problems concerned with efficient Inventory Management. EOQ
refers to the size of the order, which gives maximum economy in purchasing
in an item of Raw materials or finished products. It is fixed mainly after
taking into account the following cost.
Ordering cost
Inventory carrying cost
71
Assumptions:
1. The firm knows with certainly the annual usage or demand of the particular
items of inventories.
2. The rate at which the firm uses the inventories or makes sales is constant
throughout the year.
3. The order for replenishment of inventory is placed exactly when inventories
reach zero level.
5. Determination of optimum production quantity:
The EOQ model can be extended to production runs to determine the
optimum production quantity. The 2 costs involved are:
Setup cost
Inventory carrying cost
6. Determination of optimum Re-order level:
For optimum production quantity, it is important to decide when to order for the
new stock. New goods will arrive before the firm runs out of goods to sell. To
determine Re-order level we should know about:
The load time
The usage rate.
7. Aging Schedule Of Inventory:
By identifying the data of purchase or manufacture of each item of the inventory
is known as aging schedule of inventory.
8. Just In Time (JIT) Inventory System:
Normally high inventories blocking of capital investment, insurance etc. To
minimize that by keeping the inventories at the lowest possible level by JIT
system. JIT inventory system means all inventories whether of raw materials, WIP
& Finished goods are received in time to go into production, manufacture parts are
completed into products and products are shipped to customers. In JIT environment
the flow of goods is controlled by pull down approach.
9. Flexible Manufacturing System (FMS):
72
The basis features of FMS are automated flow of materials to the cell and
automated removal of finished items from the cell. Cells are linked together by
automated material handling system and flow of goods is controlled by a system.
RATIO ANALYSIS:
1. INVENTORY PROPORTION:
CHART:9
(Rs. IN MILLIONS)
73
INVENTORY PROPORTION
14000
12000
10000
8000
6000
4000
2000
RAW MATERIALS
WIP
FG
OTHERS
INVENTORY
INFERENCE:
1. Raw materials consumed are increasing from year by year.
2. WIP increased in first 2 years and then started decreasing.
3. FG is in increasing condition. There is a rapid change in the year 2005-06.
74
4. Total inventory is increasing from year to year. There is rapid change in the
year 2005-06.
CHART: 10
(Rs. IN MILLIONS)
COMPONENTS OF INVENTORY
7000
6000
5000
4000
3000
2000
1000
0
2004-05
2005-06
2006-07
2007-08
2008-09
75
YEAR
SALES
AVG INVENTORY
2004-05
41818.97
5375.11
2005-06
52476.57
7353.21
2006-07
71681.76
9864.41
2007-08
77425.801
11471.17
2008-09
59810.737
12769.64
(SOURCE: ANNUAL REPORTS OF COMPANY)
ITR
7.78
7.14
7.27
6.75
4.68
CHART:11
ITR
9.00
7.78
8.00
7.14
7.27
7.00
6.75
6.00
4.68
5.00
Axis Title
4.00
3.00
2.00
1.00
0.00
2004-05
2005-06
2006-07
2007-08
2008-09
INFERENCE:
1. During the 2004-05 the company has very high inventory ratio of 7.78,
which means more capital is being locked up in the inventory.
2. But from the year 2005-09 the ratio was decreased from 7.14 to 4.68.
76
YEAR
DAYS
ITR
2004-05
360
7.78
46
2005-06
360
7.14
50
2006-07
360
7.27
50
2007-08
360
6.75
53
2008-09
360
4.68
77
(SOURCE: ANNUAL REPORTS OF COMPANY)
CHART:12
80
77
70
60
46
50
50
50
53
40
30
20
10
0
2004-05
2005-06
2006-07
2007-08
2008-09
INFERENCE:
1. Inventory holding period was good from 2004-05 to 2007-08. But in
2008-09 it was just increased.
3.1 RAW MATERIALS TURN OVER RATIO:
TABLE:16
(Rs. IN MILLIONS)
77
YEAR
RAW
MATERIALS
AVG RAW
MATERIALS
RM TR
2004-05
30,020.40
2109.985
2005-06
40,645.83
2517.305
2006-07
54,081.14
3290.855
2007-08
57,480.59
4041.3385
2008-09
43218.573
4777.515
(SOURCE: ANNUAL REPORTS OF COMPANY)
14.23
16.15
16.43
14.22
9.05
CHART:13
RM TR
18.00
16.00
14.23
14.00
12.00
10.00
8.00
6.00
4.00
2.00
0.00
2004-05
16.15
16.43
14.22
9.05
2005-06
2006-07
2007-08
RM TR
INFERENCE:
1. In 2006-07 RM TR is maximum.
2. From 2004-05 to 2006-07 it was increased.
3. From 2006-07 to 2008-09 it was decreased.
2008-09
78
(Rs. IN MILLIONS)
YEAR
DAYS
RTR
2004-05
360
14.23
2005-06
360
16.15
2006-07
360
16.43
2007-08
360
14.22
2008-09
360
9.05
(SOURCE: ANNUAL REPORTS OF COMPANY)
RM HOLDING
PERIOD
25
22
22
25
40
CHART:14
45
40
40
35
30
25
25
25
22
22
2005-06
2006-07
20
15
10
5
0
2004-05
2007-08
2008-09
RM HOLDING PERIOD
INFERENCE:
1. Raw material holding period is constant in all years.
2. But it was slightly increased in 2008-09.
(Rs. IN MILLIONS)
79
YEAR
COST OF
PRODUCTION
AVG WIP
2004-05
36535.13
809.35
2005-06
48370.13
1,174.86
2006-07
61741.52
1,266.19
2007-08
67,453.23
1117.769
2008-09
52745.22
1040.646
(SOURCE: ANNUAL REPORTS OF COMPANY)
WIP TR
45.14
41.17
48.76
60.35
50.69
CHART:15
WIP TR
70.00
60.35
60.00
50.00
45.14
50.69
48.76
41.17
40.00
30.00
20.00
10.00
0.00
2004-05
2005-06
2006-07
2007-08
WIP TR
INFRENCE:
1. In 2007-08 WIP TR is highest. Remaining all years it was similar.
2. In 2005-06 it is lowest.
2008-09
80
TABLE : 19
YEAR
(Rs. IN MILLIONS)
DAYS
WIP TR
WIP HOLDING
PERIOD
8
9
7
6
7
2004-05
360
45.14
2005-06
360
41.17
2006-07
360
48.76
2007-08
360
60.35
2008-09
360
50.69
(SOURCE: ANNUAL REPORTS OF COMPANY)
CHART:16
2008-09
2007-08
2006-07
6
7
9
2005-06
2004-05
INFERENCE:
1. WIP holding period is highest in 2008-09.
2. WIP holding period is lowest in 2007-08.
81
TABLE: 20
(Rs. IN MILLIONS)
YEAR
FG TR
17.35
15.42
12.74
11.81
8.33
CHART:17
FG TR
20.00
17.35
18.00
16.00
15.42
12.74
14.00
12.00
11.81
10.00
8.33
8.00
6.00
4.00
2.00
0.00
2004-05
2005-06
2006-07
2007-08
2008-09
FG TR
INFERENCE:
82
TABLE: 21
YEAR
(Rs. IN MILLIONS)
DAYS
FG TR
2004-05
360
17.35
2005-06
360
15.42
2006-07
360
12.74
2007-08
360
11.81
2008-09
360
8.33
(SOURCE: ANNUAL REPORTS OF COMPANY)
FG HOLDING
PERIOD
21
23
28
30
43
CHART:18
FG HOLDING PERIOD
FG HOLDING PERIOD
2008-09
43
2007-08
30
2006-07
28
2005-06
2004-05
23
21
INFERENCE:
83
TABLE: 22
YEAR
(Rs. IN MILLIONS)
INVENTORY
CURRENT
ASSETS
2004-05
5680.81
21,572.63
2005-06
9025.61
22324.13
2006-07
10703.21
26977.14
2007-08
12239.14
28752.58
2008-09
13300.14
31656.16
(SOURCE: ANNUAL REPORTS OF COMPANY)
INV TO CA
RATIO
0.26
0.40
0.40
0.43
0.42
CHART:19
INV TO CA RATIO
0.45
0.40
0.35
0.26
0.30
0.25
0.20
0.15
0.10
0.05
0.00
2004-05
0.40
0.40
2005-06
2006-07
0.43
0.42
2007-08
2008-09
INV TO CA RATIO
INFERENCE:
84
INTRODUCTION:
The term debtors are defined, as debt owed to the firm by the
customers arising from sale of goods or services in the ordering course of business.
Debtors or receivables are asset accounts representing amounts owed to the firm by
customers from sale of goods or services. It has to be mentioned that the credit that
is open account in the sense that no formal acknowledgement of debt obligation is
required. In fact, a credit sale, which leads to debtors, is treated as one of the
marketing tools.
Great majority of firms does not demand immediate cash payment
when goods or services are sold to their regular and credit worthy customers.
Because of this practice, most sales require the firm to maintain debtors account
for customer or a group of them for some period. Accordingly, debtors or
receivables occupy a significant role in firms current assets structure usually next
to inventories.
Objectives of Maintaining Receivables:
Achieving growth in sales and profits. If a firm allows sales, it will
usually be able to sell more goods or services then if it insists on
immediate cash payment. Similarly, an additional sale normally
results in higher profits for the firm. This proportion will hold goods
only when the marginal contribution or gross margin greater than the
additional cost associated with the administering the credit policy.
Meeting competition:
To survive in the competitive market, firm have to establish credit
policies similar to competitors. Thus, by adopting its term of trade to
the industry norms, a firm will avoid of sale from customers who
would by elsewhere if they did not receive the expected credit.
The above 2 objectives have a single purpose, that is generate larger flow of
operating revenue and hence profit, than would be achieved in the absence of a
commitment of the funds to debtors. Extension of credit involves cost and risk
management should weigh benefits against cost. The optimum point may be
considered as the point where the return on investment in further funding of
85
receivables is less than the cost of funds raised that additional credit (i.e. cost of
capital).
Cost of Maintaining Receivables:
Credit sales, and hence maintaining of debtors, involve certain costs. They are:
86
1.
2.
3.
4.
Credit information
Credit investigation
Credit limits and
Collection procedure
For effective management of credit, a firm should lay down clear-cut guidelines
and procedures for granting credit to individual customers and collecting
individual accounts.
Size of Receivables:
An analysis of the percentage of receivables in relation assets indicates the
recovery efficiency of the company. Moreover, the % receivable in relation to sales
indicates the firm credit sales requirements. However, this kind of analysis reveals
the overall operational efficiency of the company in relation to credit sales and
their recovery.
RATIO ANALYSIS:
I. TO ANALYZE EFFICIENCY:
1. ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLES TURN OVER RATIO:
TABLE: 23
(Rs. IN MILLIONS)
87
YEAR
SALES
AVG DEBTORS
RTR
2004-05
41818.97
4321.925
2005-06
52476.57
4415.515
2006-07
71681.76
4736.06
2007-08
77425.801
4493.55
2008-09
59810.737
6669.04
(SOURCE: ANNUAL REPORTS OF COMPANY)
9.68
11.88
15.14
17.23
8.97
CHART:20
RTR
8.97
2008-09
17.23
2007-08
15.14
2006-07
11.88
2005-06
9.68
2004-05
0.00
2.00
4.00
6.00
8.00
RTR
INFERENCE:
1. Receivables turnover ratio is highest in 2007-08.
2. Receivables turnover ratio is lowest in 2008-09.
(Rs. IN MILLIONS)
88
YEAR
DAYS
RTR
2004-05
360
9.68
2005-06
360
11.88
2006-07
360
15.14
2007-08
360
17.23
2008-09
360
8.97
(SOURCE: ANNUAL REPORTS OF COMPANY)
DEBTORS
COLLECTION
PERIOD
37
30
24
21
40
CHART:21
40
30
24
2005-06
2006-07
21
2007-08
2008-09
INFERENCE:
1. Receivables management in Ashok Leyland is very efficient. From 2004-05
to 2007-08 debtors collection period was decreasing.
2. But in the year 2008-09 the collection period increased slightly.
89
TABLE: 25
YEAR
(Rs. IN MILLIONS)
SALES PER DAY DCP
2004-05
116
37
2005-06
146
30
2006-07
199
24
2007-08
215
21
2008-09
166
40
(SOURCE: ANNUAL REPORTS OF COMPANY)
AVG INVST IN
RECEIVABLES
4298
4373
4779
4517
6646
CHART:22
6000
5000
4000
4298
4373
2004-05
2005-06
4779
4517
2006-07
2007-08
3000
2000
1000
0
2008-09
INFERENCE:
1. From 2004-05 to 2007-08 the investment on receivables is constant.
2. In the year 2008-09 it is slightly increased.
90
TABLE: 26
YEAR
(Rs. IN MILLIONS)
PURCHASES
AVG
CREDITORS
2004-05
30413.01
5494.035
2005-06
41067.86
6636.955
2006-07
55206.21
8528.465
2007-08
57856.485
11531.346
2008-09
44315.029
12012.996
(SOURCE: ANNUAL REPORTS OF COMPANY)
CTR
5.54
6.19
6.47
5.02
3.69
CHART:23
CTR
7.00
6.00
5.00
5.54
4.00
6.19
6.47
5.02
3.69
3.00
2.00
1.00
0.00
2004-05
2005-06
2006-07
CTR
INFERENCE:
1. 2006-07 year has highest creditor turnover ratio.
2. 2008-09 year has lowest creditor turnover ratio.
2007-08
2008-09
91
TABLE:27
YEAR
(Rs. IN MILLIONS)
DAYS
CTR
2004-05
360
5.54
2005-06
360
6.19
2006-07
360
6.47
2007-08
360
5.02
2008-09
360
3.69
(SOURCE: ANNUAL REPORTS OF COMPANY)
CREDITORS
COLLECTION
PERIOD
65
58
56
72
98
CHART:24
100
8065
60
72
58
56
2005-06
2006-07
40
20
0
2004-05
2007-08
INFERENCE:
1. In the year 2006-07 creditors collection period is low 56.
2. In the year 2008-09 the creditors collection period is very high 98.
2008-09
92
(Rs. IN MILLIONS)
RECEIVABLES
CURRENT
ASSETS
2004-05
4587.66
21,572.63
2005-06
4243.37
22324.13
2006-07
5228.75
26977.14
2007-08
3758.351
28752.58
2008-09
9579.742
31656.16
(SOURCE: ANNUAL REPORTS OF COMPANY)
REC TO CA
RATIO
0.21
0.19
0.19
0.13
0.30
CHART:25
REC TO CA RATIO
0.35
0.30
0.30
0.25
0.21
0.20
0.19
0.19
0.13
0.15
0.10
0.05
0.00
2004-05
2005-06
2006-07
2007-08
2008-09
REC TO CA RATIO
INFERENCE:
1. From the table given above, it is clear that receivable to current asset ratio is
low in 2007-08. That means receivables management is very efficient in that
year.
2. But in the year 2008-09 it is the highest.
4.2.3 CASH MANAGEMENT
93
Introduction:
Cash the most liquid asset, is of vital important of the daily operations of business
firms. While the proportion of corporate assets in the form of cash is very small,
often between 1 & 3% its efficient management is crucial to the solvency of
business in a very important sense. Cash is the focal point of fund flows in
business. In view of its importance, it is generally referred to as the life blood of
a business enterprise.
Need For Holding Cash:
1. Transaction motive:
Firms need cash to meet their transaction needs. The collection of
cash (from sale of goods services, sale of goods, and additional
financing) is not perfectly synchronized with the disbursement of cash
(for purchase of goods and services acquisition of capital assets and
meeting other obligations).
2. Precautionary motive:
There may be some uncertainty about magnitude and timing of
cash inflows from sale of goods and services, sale of assets and
insurances of purchases. Like flows on account of purchases and other
obligations, to protect it against such uncertainties, a firm may require
some cash balances.
3. Speculative motive:
Firms would like to tap profit-making opportunities arising from
fluctuations in commodity prices, security prices, interest rates and
foreign exchange rates cash-rich firm is prepared to exploit such
speculative earnings, may require additional liquidity. However, for
most firms there reserve borrowing capacity and marketable securities
would suffice to meet their speculative needs.
4. Compensating motive:
Yet another motive to hold cash balances is to compensate banks
for providing certain services and loans. Banks provide a variety of
94
long-term
95
because payment of taxes, dividends, seasonal inventory etc, build up while other
times, it may have surfeit of cash stemming out of large out of cash sales and quick
collection of receivables.
It is interesting to observe that in real life management spends his considerable
time in managing cash, which constitute relatively small portion of firms current
assets.
RATIO ANALYSIS:
I. TO ANALYZE OVERALL EFFECIENCY:
96
(Rs. IN MILLIONS)
SALES
CTR
7.46
7.50
13.81
17.47
22.17
CHART:26
CTR
25.00
22.17
20.00
17.47
13.81
15.00
10.007.46
CTR
7.50
5.00
0.00
2004-05
2005-06
2006-07
2007-08
2008-09
INFERENCE:
(Rs. IN MILLIONS)
97
YEAR
DAYS
ITR
CASH
HOLDING
PERIOD
48
48
26
21
16
2004-05
360
7.46
2005-06
360
7.50
2006-07
360
13.81
2007-08
360
17.47
2008-09
360
22.17
(SOURCE: ANNUAL REPORTS OF COMPANY)
CHART:27
48
50
40
26
30
21
20
16
10
0
2004-05
2005-06
2006-07
2007-08
2008-09
INFERENCE:
1. From the table given above in 2004-05 and 2005-06 the cash holding period
is very high 48days.
2. But from 2006-07 to 2008-09 it is decreased from 26 days to 16 days.
98
1. CASH RATIO:
TABLE: 31
YEAR
(Rs. IN MILLIONS)
CASH
CURRENT
LIABILITIES
2004-05
7966.82
11656.67
2005-06
6028.76
14085.16
2006-07
4349.39
17558.55
2007-08
4513.7
22719.39
2008-09
880.84
21369.46
(SOURCE: ANNUAL REPORTS OF COMPANY)
CASH RATIO
0.68
0.43
0.25
0.20
0.04
CHART:28
CASH RATIO
CASH RATIO
0.800.68
0.70
0.60
0.50
0.40
0.30
0.20
0.10
0.00
2004-05
0.43
0.25
0.20
0.04
2005-06
2006-07
2007-08
2008-09
INFERENCE:
1. From the above table it is clear that cash ratio that is cash availability is
decreasing from year by year.
2. In the year 2008-09 it is just 0.04.
99
(Rs. IN MILLIONS)
CASH
CURRENT
ASSETS
2004-05
7966.82
21,572.63
2005-06
6028.76
22324.13
2006-07
4349.39
26977.14
2007-08
4513.7
28752.58
2008-09
880.84
31656.16
(SOURCE: ANNUAL REPORTS OF COMPANY)
CASH TO CA
RATIO
0.37
0.27
0.16
0.16
0.03
CHART:29
CASH TO CA RATIO
0.400.37
0.35
0.30
0.27
0.25
0.20
0.16
0.16
0.15
0.10
0.03
0.05
0.00
2004-05
2005-06
2006-07
2007-08
2008-09
CASH TO CA RATIO
INFERENCE:
From the above table it is clear that percentage of cash in current assets is
very less and decreasing from year by year.
In 2008-09 it is just 3%.
100
FG Holding Period
TABLE: 33
(Rs. IN MILLIONS)
YEAR
RM
WIP HP FG
DCP
CCP
HP
HP
2004-05
25
8
21
37
65
2005-06
22
9
23
30
58
2006-07
22
7
28
24
56
2007-08
25
6
30
21
72
2008-09
40
7
43
40
98
(SOURCE: ANNUAL REPORTS OF COMPANY)
OPERATING
CYCLE
26
26
25
10
32
101
CHART:30
OPERATING CYCLE
35
32
30
26
26
25
25
20
15
10
10
5
0
2004-05
2005-06
2006-07
OPERATING CYCLE
INFERENCE:
2007-08
2008-09
102
CHAPTER 5
ESTIMATION OF
WORKING CAPITAL
1. TIME SERIES
ANALYSIS
2. LEAST SQUARES
METHOD
3.
FORECASTS
4. ESTIMATION OF
WORKING CAPITAL
103
b=XY/(X*X)
104
(Rs. IN MILLIONS)
YEAR
2004-05
SALES(Y) X
41818.97
-2
X*X
4
2005-06
52476.57
-1
2006-07
71681.76
2007-08
77425.801
2008-09
59810.737
total
303213.83
8
10
2009-10
CHART:31
X*Y
a
-83637.9 60642.767
6
-52476.6 60642.767
6
0
60642.767
6
77425.8 60642.767
6
119621.5 60642.767
6
60932.7
7
60642.767
6
b
6093.27
7
6093.27
7
6093.27
7
6093.27
7
6093.27
7
Ye=a+bX
48456.214
6
54549.4911
6093.27
7
78922.6
60642.767
6
66736.044
1
72829.320
6
105
SALES
90000
80000
70000
60000
50000
40000
30000
20000
10000
0
2004-05
2005-06
2006-07
2007-08
2008-09
INFERENCE:
The estimated value of sales for the year 2009-10 is 78922.6
Ye=a+bx is forecasted values for all 5 years.
The above chart shows the accuracy of forecasting.
II. FORECASTING OF CURRENT ASSETS:
1. INVENTORY:
TABLE: 35
YEAR
2004-05
2005-06
2006-07
2007-08
2008-09
total
2009-10
INVENT
ORY(Y)
5680.81
9025.61
10703.21
12239.14
13300.14
50948.91
CHART:32
(Rs. IN MILLIONS)
X
X*X
X*Y
Ye=a+bX
-2
-1
0
1
2
0
3
4
1
0
1
4
10
-11361.6
-9025.61
0
12239.14
26600.28
18452.19
10189.782
10189.782
10189.782
10189.782
10189.782
1845.219
1845.219
1845.219
1845.219
1845.219
6499.344
8344.563
10189.782
12035.001
13880.22
10189.782 1845.219
15725.44
106
INVENTORY
16000
14000
12000
10000
8000
6000
4000
2000
0
2004-05
2005-06
2006-07
INVENTORY(Y)
2007-08
2008-09
Ye=a+bX
INFERENCE:
2. CASH:
TABLE: 36
YEAR
2004-05
2005-06
2006-07
2007-08
2008-09
total
2009-10
CASH(Y)
7966.82
6028.76
4349.39
4513.7
880.84
23739.51
CHART:33
(Rs. IN MILLIONS)
X
-2
-1
0
1
2
0
3
X*X
4
1
0
1
4
10
X*Y
-15933.6
-6028.76
0
4513.7
1761.68
-15687
a
4747.902
4747.902
4747.902
4747.902
4747.902
b
-1569
-1569
-1569
-1569
-1569
Ye=a+bX
7885.306
6316.604
4747.902
3179.2
1610.498
4747.902
-1569
41.796
107
CASH
9000
8000
7000
6000
5000
4000
3000
2000
1000
0
2004-05
2005-06
2006-07
2007-08
2008-09
INFERENCE:
3. SUNDRY DEBTORS:
TABLE: 37
YEAR
2004-05
2005-06
2006-07
2007-08
2008-09
total
2009-10
SUNDRY
DEBTORS(Y)
4587.66
4243.37
5228.75
3758.351
9579.742
27397.873
CHART:34
(Rs. IN MILLIONS)
X
X*X X*Y
Ye=a+bX
-2
-1
0
1
2
0
3
4
1
0
1
4
10
5479.575
5479.575
5479.575
5479.575
5479.575
949.9145
949.9145
949.9145
949.9145
949.9145
3579.7456
4529.6601
5479.5746
6429.4891
7379.4036
-9175.32
-4243.37
0
3758.351
19159.48
9499.145
108
SR. DEBTORS
12000
10000
8000
6000
4000
2000
0
2004-05
2005-06
2006-07
SUNDRY DEBTORS(Y)
2007-08
2008-09
Ye=a+bX
INFERENCE:
The estimated value of sundry debtors for the year 2009-10 is 8329.32
Ye=a+bx is forecasted values for all 5 years.
The above chart shows the accuracy of forecasting.
Only in the year 2007-08 forecasting accuracy is less.
LOANS &
ADVANCES(Y)
3337.34
3026.39
6695.79
8241.385
7895.435
29196.34
CHART:35
(Rs. IN MILLIONS)
X
X*X X*Y
Ye=a+bX
-2
-1
0
1
2
0
3
4
1
0
1
4
10
5839.27
5839.27
5839.27
5839.27
5839.27
1433.12
1433.12
1433.12
1433.12
1433.12
2973.031
4406.1495
5839.268
7272.3865
8705.505
5839.27
1433.12
10138.62
-6674.68
-3026.39
0
8241.385
15790.87
14331.19
109
2005-06
2006-07
2007-08
2008-09
INFERENCE:
The estimated value of loans and advances for the year 2009-10 is 10138.62
Ye=a+bx is forecasted values for all 5 years.
The above chart shows the accuracy of forecasting.
III.CURRENT LIABILITIES:
1. LIABILITIES:
TABLE: 39
YEAR
2004-05
2005-06
2006-07
2007-08
2008-09
total
2009-10
CHART:36
(Rs. IN MILLIONS)
LIABILITIE
S(Y)
9611.87
11468.95
16516.25
19267.084
18688.641
75552.795
X
-2
-1
0
1
2
0
3
X*
X
4
1
0
1
4
10
X*Y
Ye=a+bX
-19223.7
-11469
0
19267.08
37377.28
25951.68
15110.56
15110.56
15110.56
15110.56
15110.56
2595.17
2595.17
2595.17
2595.17
2595.17
9920.22
12515.39
15110.56
17705.73
20300.89
15110.56
2595.2
22896.1
110
CURRENT LIABILITIES
25000
20000
15000
10000
5000
0
2004-05
2005-06
2006-07
2007-08
2008-09
INFERENCE:
2. PROVISIONS:
TABLE: 40
YEAR
2004-05
2005-06
2006-07
2007-08
2008-09
total
2009-10
PROVISIONS(
Y)
2044.8
2616.21
1042.3
3452.309
2680.817
11836.436
CHART:37
(Rs. IN MILLIONS)
X
-2
-1
0
1
2
0
3
X*
X
4
1
0
1
4
10
X*Y
Ye=a+bX
-4089.6
-2616.21
0
3452.309
5361.634
2108.133
2367.29
2367.29
2367.29
2367.29
2367.29
210.81
210.81
210.81
210.81
210.81
1945.66
2156.47
2367.29
2578.10
2788.91
2367.287
210.81
2999.73
111
PROVISIONS
4000
3500
3000
2500
2000
1500
1000
500
0
2004-05
2005-06
2006-07
2007-08
2008-09
INFERENCE:
(Rs. IN MILLIONS)
2009
2010
INCREAS
E
13300.144
9579.742
880.836
15725.4 2425.296
8329.32
41.796
7895.44
31656.14
10138.6 2243.18
34235.2
DECREAS
E
1250.422
839.04
112
CURRENT
LIABILITIES
liabilities
provisions
(B)
18688.641
2680.82
21369.461
22896.1
2999.73
25895.8
(A-B)
10286.679
WORKING
CAPITAL
increasing in WC
TOTAL
10286.679
8339.35
1947.33 1947.333
10286.7 6615.8
4207.459
318.91
6615.8
INFERENCE:
Estimation shows that there is a increase in current assets.
Estimation shows that there is a increase in current liabilities.
The entire table shows the estimation of schedule of changes of working
capital.
CHAPTER 6
SUMMARY OF
FINDINGS
SUGGESTIONS
AND
113
CONLUSION
FINDINGS:
6.1 STATEMENTS SHOWING SCHEDULE OF CHANGES IN WORKING
CAPITAL:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
There has been increase in the working capital for the year 2004-05.
There has been decrease in the working capital for the year 2005-06.
There has been increase in the working capital for the year 2006-07.
There has been decrease in the working capital for the year 2007-08.
There has been increase in the working capital for the year 2008-09.
114
115
2) RECEIVABLES MANAGEMENT:
Receivables turnover ratio is highest in 2007-08.
116
3) CASH MANAGEMENT:
Cash turnover ratio is kept on increasing from the year 2004-05 to 2008-09.
There is a constant growth in increase.
From the table given above in 2004-05 and 2005-06 the cash holding period
is very high 48days.
But from 2006-07 to 2008-09 it is decreased from 26 days to 16 days.
From the above table it is clear that cash ratio that is cash availability is
decreasing from year by year.
In the year 2008-09 it is just 0.04
From the above table it is clear that percentage of cash in current assets is
very less and decreasing from year by year.
In 2008-09 it is just 3%.
117
RECOMMENDATIONS:
118
Company should raise funds through short term sources for short
term requirement of funds, which comparatively economical as
compare to long term funds.
Company should take control on debtor s collection period which
is major part of current assets.
Company has to take control on cash balance because cash is
non earning assets and increasing cost of funds.
Company should reduce the inventory holding period with use of
zero inventory concepts.
Company should make a policy in respect of investment of excess cash,
if any; in marketable securities and overall cash policy should be
introduced.
Management should develop a credit policy and proper self realization
system from customers so that efficient and effective management of
accounts receivable can be ensured. This will significantly improve the
profitability and liquidity of the company.
Over all company has good liquidity position and sufficient funds to repayment of
liabilities. Company is increasing sales volume per year which supported to
company to increase the market share year by year.
CONCLUSION
Working capital management is important aspect of financial management. The
study of working capital management in Ashok Leyland ltd , has revealed that the
current ration was as per the standard industrial practice but the liquidity
position of the company showed an increasing trend. The study has been
conducted on working capital ratio analysis, working capital leverage,
working capital components which helped the company to manage its working
capital efficiency and affectively.
119
120
Appendic
es
BIBLIOGRAPHY:
121
BOOKS REFERRED:
M.Y. KHAN AND P.K. JAIN --FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT;-Tata McGraw-Hill Publication
WEBSITES:
WWW.ASHOKLEYLAND.COM
WWW.MENTORMYPROJECT.COM
WWW.SCRIBD.COM
WWW.MANAGEMENTPARADISE.COM
WWW.BIZSTATS.COM
WWW.FINDARTICLES.COM
WWW.BRITANNICA.COM
WWW.INDIAINFOLINE.COM
WWW.BIZRESEARCHPAPERS.COM
WWW.OPPAPERS.COM
WWW.ALLBUSINESS.COM
WWW.DOCSTOC.COM
ANNEXURE
BALANCE SHEET:
122
(Rs.IN MILLIONS)
PARTICULARS 2004-05
Source Of
Funds
Shareholders
Fund
Capital
1,189.29
Reserves And
10,489.36
Surplus
11,678.65
Loan Funds
Secured Loans
2,634.96
Unsecured Loans 6,169.10
8,804.06
Deferred Tax
1,708.48
Liability-Net
Foreign Currency
Monetary Item
Translation
Difference-Net
Total
22,191.19
Application Of
Funds
Fixed Assets
Gross Block
20,022.50
Less
11,084.04
Depreciation
Net Block
8938.46
Capital Work-In- 851.55
Progress
9790.01
Investments
2291.9
Current Assets,
Loans And
Advances
Inventories
5680.81
2005-06
2006-07
2007-08
2008-09
1,221.59
12,902.94
1,323.87
17,621.81
1,330.34
20,159.48
1,330.34
33,408.65
14,124.53
18,945.68
21,489.83
34,738.99
1,846.91
5,072.37
6,919.28
1,796.89
3,602.16
2,801.82
6,403.98
1,969.29
1,902.40
6,972.61
8,875.01
2,538.20
3,044.13
16,537.31
19,581.44
2,634.37
22,840.70
27,318.95
32,903.03
56,993.21
21,384.99
11925.28
26,201.97
13131.64
29,424.38
14,168.88
49,532.72
15,541.56
9432.71
1414.17
13070.33
2374.91
15,255.50
5,292.45
33,991.16
9,982.89
10846.88
3681.78
15445.24
2210.94
20,547.95
6,098.99
43,974.06
2,635.57
9025.61
10703.21
12239.14
13,300.14
123
Sundry Debtors
Cash And Bank
Balances
Loans And
Advances
Less Current
Liabilities And
Provisions
Liabilities
Provisions
Net Current
Assets
Miscellaneous
Expenditure
Total
4587.66
7966.82
4243.37
6028.76
5228.75
4349.39
3758.35
4513.7
9,579.74
880.836
3337.34
3026.39
6695.79
8241.39
7,895.44
21572.63
22324.13
26977.14
28752.58
31,656.14
9611.87
2044.8
11,656.67
9915.96
11468.95
2616.21
14085.16
8238.97
16516.25
1042.3
17558.55
9418.59
19267.08
3452.31
22,719.39
6033.187
18,688.64
2,680.82
21,369.46
10,286.68
193.32
73.07
244.18
222.91
96.88
22,191.19
22,840.70
27,318.95
32,903.03
56,993.21