All contents copyright 2008 all rights reserved

Recent Project

Raising Jeffery Dahmer

Raising Jeffrey Dahmer is Renegades first feature film and screened April
13, 2006.

All contents copyright 2008 all rights reserved

Raising Jeffrey Dahmer is being release in June 2008 by

There are two primary reasons for the success of Raising Jeffrey
Dahmer.
1. Selection of a project with audience demand.
And
2. Aggressive budget on the production while keeping
production values high..

All contents copyright 2008 all rights reserved

Action Plan
Currently the distributor, Barnholtz Entertainment, has committed
to the film project Chameleon. Barnholtz Entertainment will provide
all finishing funds, legal expenses and provide all deliverables for
international distribution. They will place the film with a distributor
like LIONSGATE or The Weinstein Company for wide direct to video
distribution throughout North America.
What is needed is immediate funding for the production of this film
at a cost of $140,000. As the funder of this project you will be in
the first dollar back position.
This film will be produced in Los Angeles.
Director of this film will be Mike Feifer who is skilled at making
aggressively budgeted films that have a very positive sales result.
Disclaimer: As with any project in the motion picture business this
is a risky investment and the investor should be able to withstand
the loss of all funds.

All contents copyright 2008 all rights reserved

Chameleon:
The Life and Crimes of Henry Lee Lucas
Americas most prolific, creatively vicious and perverted serial murderer criss-crosses the
nation on a years-long killing spree.

All contents copyright 2008 all rights reserved

Chameleon:
The Life and Crimes of Henry Lee Lucas
Based on Actual Events
Screenplay by Christopher Ryan and Wood Dickinson

Logline: Americas most prolific, creatively vicious and perverted serial murderer crisscrosses the nation on a years-long killing spree.

Born to a particularly nasty and hateful prostitute and a legless drunk, Henry Lee Lucas
has plenty of reasons to be angryangry enough to murder his mother. But he doesnt
stop with getting even for his mothers cruelty, which includes forcing Henry to watch
her have sex with her Johns. After spending years in prison for his crime, using the time
to study police procedure and review the crimes of other killers to learn why they got
caught, Henry emerges with the knowledge he needs to snuff out innocent lives with
virtual impunity.
Before long, Henry teams up with Ottis Toole, a twisted, remorseless human monster,
and his niece, Becky. Tied to Toole by the fetters of his own sick desires and a real
affection (or as real an affection as he can feel) for Becky, Henry accompanies Toole on a
killing spree. As the corpses accumulate, law enforcement is powerless to stop the
carnage. The killings dont fit a pattern. They have some elements in common but too
many differences. Henry has learned his lessons well. Only two Texas Rangers see the
real picture but, because of jurisdictional jealousies among law-enforcement agencies,
they can do little except watch the death toll climb.
In the end, it is Henry himself who ends the killing. Or does he? Remorseful over
stabbing Becky to death for nagging him, he confesses to hundreds of murders, but has he
committed them? He doesnt mention Ottis. The Rangers have their doubts, but other
officials just want to clear old cases. Theyre willing to believe anything Henry says and
even feed him the information he needs to confess convincingly. The Rangers are left to
wonderjust how many people has Henry Lee Lucas murdered, and will the rising tide
of death actually ebb with Henry on death row? The answer is a grim commentary on
human depravity and the blindness of people assigned the task of protecting the innocent.

All contents copyright 2008 all rights reserved

Important Announcement
Tax incentive for Investment in Motion Pictures
As of 2004 the Federal GOVERNMENT AMMENDED THE TAX CODE TO HELP
INDEPENDENT FILMMAKERS.
Bill HR 4520 (2004) allows us to offer a great tax incentive if you invest in one of our
feature film projects. The film budget must be below $15,000,000. Your investment is
100% tax deductible. This is a code section 181 special election.
The investment can be taken as a deduction the same year that the money is spent making
the film.
Example:
If you invest $100,000 in a $500,000 budgeted film once the money is spent in the
production of that film you can take a $100,000 off your income tax. It is that simple. If
the production spans two years then the portion spent in year one applies to that years
taxes and the portion spent in year two applies to those.
Dont pay Uncle Sam invest with Renegade Pictures, LLC.

Future projects include:

Chameleon
All contents copyright 2008 all rights reserved

SUMMERY
H.R.4520
Title: To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to remove
impediments in such Code and make our manufacturing, service, and
high-technology businesses and workers more competitive and
productive both at home and abroad.
Sponsor: Rep Thomas, William M. [CA-22] (introduced 6/4/2004)
Cosponsors (40)
Related Bills:
H.RES.681, H.RES.830, H.R.2896, H.R.5395, S.1637, S.3019
Latest Major Action: Became Public Law No: 108-357 [GPO:
Text, PDF]
House Reports: 108-548 Part 1; Latest Conference Report: 108-755
(in Congressional Record H8411-8640)
Jump to: Summary, Major Actions, All Actions, Titles, Cosponsors,
Committees, Related Bill Details, Amendments, Summary
SUMMARY AS OF:
10/22/2004--Public Law. (There are 5 other summaries)
Sec. 244) Allows an election until 2009 to expense qualified film or television
production costs up to $15 million ($20 million for costs incurred in certain
low-income or distressed areas).
Defines "qualified production activities income" as the excess (if any) of
domestic production gross receipts over the sum of the cost of goods sold
allocable to such receipts, other deductions, expenses, or losses directly
allocable to such receipts, and a ratable portion of other deductions, expenses,
and losses that are not directly allocable to such receipts or another class of
income. Includes within the definition of domestic production gross receipts
qualifying production property (i.e., tangible personal property, any computer
software, and certain sound recordings), any qualified film produced by the
taxpayer, electricity, natural gas, or potable water produced by the taxpayer
in the United States, construction performed in the United States, or
engineering or architectural services for projects in the United States, but
excludes the sale of certain food and beverages sold at retail and the
transmission or distribution of electricity, natural gas, or potable water.

All contents copyright 2008 all rights reserved

The Domestic Film Production Incentive Program

Contained in the 2004 JOBS Act
New Section 181 of the Internal Revenue Code
A Brief Guide to the Tax Provision
Qualifying Film Expenses Immediately Deductible. Investors in qualifying film and
television productions may elect to immediately deduct the cost of qualifying film
expenditures in the year the expenditure occurs.
Qualified film and television productions1 include any production of a motion
picture (whether released theatrically or directly to video cassette or any other
format); miniseries; scripted, dramatic television episode; or movie of the week.
Only the first 44 episodes, including the pilot production, of a scripted dramatic
series would be eligible under this Act.
In the case of a film co-produced by multiple investors, the deduction for
qualifying expenditures must be allocated among the owners of the film in a
manner that reasonably reflects each owners proportionate investment and
economic interest in the film.
Qualified films do not include sexually explicit productions as defined in section
2257 of title 18 of the U.S. Code.
Qualifying Expenses Generally Capped at $15 million. The proposal applies only to
qualifying film or television productions the aggregate cost of which does not exceed $15
million.
The $15 million cap applies to each individual episode of the 44 episodes,
including the pilot production, of a scripted dramatic series that are eligible
under this Act.2
A higher expenditure cap of $20 million applies to productions the aggregate
costs of which are significantly incurred in: a) areas eligible for designation
as a low-income community under the New Markets Tax Credit program,3 or
b) areas eligible for designation by the Delta Regional Authority as a
distressed county or isolated area of distress.

Productions described in section 168(f)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code

While a recent Joint Tax Committee explanation of the 2004 legislation supports this per episode
application of the cap, this still must be clarified in technical corrections legislation that the tax writing
committee chairmen will soon introduce.
3
As defined in section 45A of the Internal Revenue Code.
2

All contents copyright 2008 all rights reserved

 As defined by the New Markets Tax Credit program, qualifying low-income

communities include any census tract if (a) the poverty rate for such tracts is
at least 20 percent; or (b) (1) in the case of census tracts not located with a
metropolitan area, the median family income for
the tract does not exceed 80% of statewide median family income, or (2) in
the cast of a tract located with a metropolitan area, the median family income
for the tract does not exceed 80% of the greater of statewide median family
income or the metropolitan area median family income. A list of qualifying
areas can be found at: http://www.cdfifund.gov/mapping/mapping.asp
A list of areas eligible under the Delta Regional Authority statute as distressed
counties or isolated areas of distress can be found at:
http://www.dra.gov/dra_coverage_map.html
Qualifying Compensation Rule. To qualify, at least 75 percent of the total compensation
expended on the production must be for services performed in the United States.
Qualifying compensation includes payments for services performed in the United
States by actors, directors, producers, and other relevant production personnel.
Compensation does not include participations and residuals.4
Tax Benefit Duration. This new domestic film production incentive program will be in
effect for qualifying productions commencing after 22 October 2004 and before 1
January 2009.
Legislative Note. The provisions of the JOBS Act were signed into law by President
Bush on 22 October 2004. While the production incentives portion of the law became
fully useable as of that date, certain issues have arisen that require further clarification by
Congress and the Treasury Department. The Joint Tax Committee issued its clarifications
on 31 May. These are reflected in the forgoing material. Still to come are a technical
corrections bill that the chairmen of the House Ways and Means and Senate Finance
Committee will soon introduce, and regulatory guidance that the Department of Treasury
and the Internal Revenue Service will release.
THIS HANDOUT IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY AND SHOULD NOT BE VIEWED
AS TAX ADVICE WITH RESPECT TO YOUR PRODUCTION ACTIVITIES. FOR SUCH ADVICE,
YOU SHOULD CONSULT WITH YOUR TAX ADVISOR.

As defined in section 167(g)(7(B) of the Internal Revenue Code

All contents copyright 2008 all rights reserved

10

2004 JOBS Act Production Incentives

Frequently Asked Questions

(1) Q: When do productions need to commence to qualify for the new incentive?
A: The incentive is available for qualified productions commencing after October 22,
2004, and before January 1, 2009.
(2) Q: If a film has started production before and continues through October 22,
2004 can it qualify for this tax incentive?
A: No, only productions commencing after October 22, 2004, and before January 1,
2009 can qualify.
(3) Q: Can the immediate write-offs be taken in more than one year?
A: Yes, if an election is made to use the incentive, the immediate deduction takes
place in the year the expenditure is incurred. Therefore, if production expenditures are
incurred in more than one year, the immediate tax deduction will be taken in more
than one year.
(4) Q: When, where, and how does the election to immediately deduct the
qualifying expenditures apply?
A: The election is to be made on the tax return for the taxable year in which the
production costs are first incurred. The election must be made by the due date
(including extensions of time) of such return. The manner and form of the election
will be determined by the IRS at a later date.
(5) Q: Does it apply to all productions (e.g., big budget productions)?
A: No, the immediate write-off provision does not apply to productions whose
aggregate cost exceeds $15 million ($20 million in the case of productions in certain
low-income and eligible areas of the country). However, all productions including
those below and in excess of $15 million ($20 million) have other new potential
incentives including a new 9% tax deduction for U.S. production activities.
(6) Q: What is the real benefit of this incentive?
A: This is a significant new Federal tax incentive that allows producers of qualifying
productions to take a tax deduction for the full costs of a production in the year the
cost is incurred (as opposed to having to spread or amortize those costs over a period
of years). Deducting the costs up front, while deferring the income from the films
until later years when it is incurred will significantly reduce or eliminate taxable
income for the film in the early years of exploitation.
(7) Q: How do I determine if it is beneficial to my production?

All contents copyright 2008 all rights reserved

11

A: Since the new incentive is elective, producers can run numbers both with and
without the new incentive and determine whether or not to elect to immediately
expense the production costs in the first year(s).

(8) Q: What tax form do I need to fill out to get the incentive?
A: Currently, there is no specific form to fill out. The IRS is expected to issue further
guidance on the incentive. In the absence of specific guidance, the legislative history
states that: "deducting qualifying costs on the appropriate tax return shall constitute a
valid election." Therefore, deducting the production costs (that would otherwise be
capitalized) on your tax return will qualify as electing to take advantage of this
incentive.
(9) Q: Is the incentive transferable?
A: No. However, different entity structures such as limited liability corporations,
partnerships, and others, should be considered to properly allocate costs that could be
immediately expensed.
(10) Q: What happens in the case of a co-production or a film financed by multiple
investors?
A: The $15 million ($20 million) threshold refers to the qualifying film. Thus, a
qualifying film that is co-produced must in total come under the threshold. The
benefits of the provision must be allocated among the owners of a film in a manner
that reasonably reflects each owners proportionate investment in and economic
interest in the film.
(11) What is considered aggregate costs to determine if my aggregate production
costs exceed the $15 million ($20 million) threshold?
A: The determination of what costs are included in the calculation of the threshold is
not specifically addressed in the legislation. These costs should be the costs that
would otherwise be capitalized and amortized as part of the production. IRS
guidance in the form of Notices or regulations may help clarify this issue.
(12) In order to qualify for the higher ($20 million) threshold what does it mean to
require that a significant amount of the expenditures be incurred in an eligible
area?
A: The term significant is not defined in the new statute, but for Federal tax
purposes, it can have a number of meanings. Typically, it means that over 50% of the
expenditures would have to be incurred in the eligible area. This is another issue that
may be subject to further clarification by IRS guidance.
(13) How will other practical issues related to this new incentive be determined?
A: Like other tax issues, producers should consult with their professional tax
advisors on any issues related to this new Federal tax incentive. It is expected that the
Treasury Department and the IRS will issue guidance to further interpret the statute.

All contents copyright 2008 all rights reserved

12

This guidance may come in the form of Notices and Regulations. A number of groups
that worked on this important legislative change are expected to continue working
with the Treasury Department and the IRS to ensure the incentive fulfills its objective
and provides the industry with meaningful tax relief.
THIS HANDOUT IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY AND SHOULD NOT BE VIEWED
AS TAX ADVICE WITH RESPECT TO YOUR PRODUCTION ACTIVITIES. FOR SUCH ADVICE,
YOU SHOULD CONSULT WITH YOUR TAX ADVISOR.

All contents copyright 2008 all rights reserved

13

Appendix

All contents copyright 2008 all rights reserved

14

 Back | Print

Scary movies make a killing on DVD

SCARY MOVIES GUIDE: Studios find major potential in low-budget horror genre
By Chris Gennusa -- Video Business, 1/29/2007

Even when their box-office performance is no thriller, studios and retailers have no fear that scary movies can possess monster profit potential on
DVD.
Snakes On a Plane (New Line/Warner) and The Covenant (Sony) earned less than $60 million combined at the box office last year, but the frightful
flicks proved to be a dynamic duo by topping VBs DVD sellers and renters charts as new releases earlier this month.
The production and marketing costs of [most horror films] are reasonable, so they can be nice moneymakers for studios even if the theatrical
performance is low, says Matt Lasorsa, executive VP of marketing for New Line Home Entertainment. If any genre is going to overachieve in
home video, its going to be horror.
Lasorsa admits that New Lines $34 million box-office take for Snakes On a Plane fell short of expectations, but he counters that hes not
surprised the Samuel L. Jackson starrer is readily being snapped up by consumers on DVD. Its off to a great start, he says.
The Covenant, a scary movie with a sci-fi bent, grossed just $23.4 million in theaters before finding success on DVD. For whatever reason, fans
of this genre seem to enjoy the opportunity to explore these films at home, says Jennifer Anderson, VP of marketing for Sony Pictures Home
Entertainment.
Of course, bona fide box-office hits such as Saw II also make a nice DVD profit.
Saw II reportedly cost less than $5 million to produce but earned $10 million in
rentals alone during its February 2006 DVD debut week. The Lionsgate release
took in nearly $90 million at the box office. Lionsgate has similar expectations for
the Jan. 23 DVD release of Saw III, which grossed more than $80 million
theatrically.
Our core titlesSaw, Descent and Devils Rejectstheir DVD outperforms
their box office, says Chela Johnson, Lionsgate executive director of marketing.
Frequency doesnt seem to saturate the demand. We release [new titles in] our
horror franchises every year, not every two years, she says.
Lionsgate arguably has been the most prolific studio in releasing horror films on
DVD, despite whether the films get a theatrical release. The studio annually
releases 50 direct-to-DVD titles and another half-dozen theatrically, Johnson
says.

The Saw films are one of Lionsgate's most

successful horror franchises.

What works on DVD

When films cant find success in theaters, its often because of their budgets: low budgets generally mean no stars, and a lack of recognizable
faces can doom a film at the box office.
But with A-list box art, even a theatrical turkey can morph into a home video cash cow.
Eye-grabbing, heart-stabbing box art is essential, especially with direct-to-video horror films, says Brett Patzer, a buyer for State College, Pa.s
three-store chain Mikes Video. A werewolf on the box is better than a toned-down box, he says.
Yet different consumers are looking for different things. The horror film field is littered with sequels and remakes, but the 18-34 horror
demographic is very now oriented. Keith Leopard, a product director at Blockbuster, notes that recent remakes of such Hollywood horror

classics as The Hills Have Eyes and The Texas Chainsaw Massacre dont really boost the sales or rentals of the originals.
The originals are more cult films, he says. If youre really into horror films, you watch those. [The younger fans today], they dont even
remember the originals or werent born when the originals were made. Its just such a different audience today.
Halloween and Psycho, theyre a different breed, adds Patzer. Years ago, you didnt have the horror genre like it is today, he says. You just
didnt have the depth of horror movies [years ago], and consumer thirst is there.
What works anywhere
To satisfy that consumer need for blood-stained cinema, producers are going outside the traditional Hollywood studio system for distribution, and
theyre going overseas for ideas.
Because of all the direct-to-video releases and Japanese remakes in recent years, the [horror] category itself has seen quite an increase" in titles,
says Blockbusters Leopard.
But some concepts seem to work universally. Though special effects technology has grown exponentially sophisticated since 1978s Dawn of the
Living Dead inspired a generation of horror moviemakers, the basic plotlines of horror films havent changed much over the years.
Several treatments successfully entertain the avid fan, says Sonys Anderson. Stories about attractive travelers lost and stranded and a strong
female or male character that must defeat evil are great concepts that work well with this genre on DVD.
Die-hard horror film buffs are no doubt thrilled that the trend in DVDs is pointing toward more, more, more.
The most desired extra feature for horror DVDs is an unrated version with additional footage too scary for theaters, released day-and-date with
the theatrical DVD release, says Anderson.
Leopard, however, doesnt believe the bonus footage is vital at rental.
For the masses, the extra footage isnt as important; its purely a marketing tool, he says, and its aimed more at collectors.
But the bonus material is one more reason why fans can make a theatrical release outperform on DVD.
Back | Print
2008, Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Advertisement

Site Index

All

Search

| Your Account | Help | Log Out

Go! | Advanced Search

Company Directory | People Directory | In Production | STARmeter | Box Office | News | Calendar |
Message Boards
BREAKING NEWS: Golden Globes Ceremony, Parties Canceled more

Michael Feifer
Main Details Filmography Personal Details Media Contact Clients/Coworkers
Main Details
STARmeter
Filmography
Summary
Year
Profession
Title Type
TV Series
Credited Name
Genre
Keyword
Budget
Box Office
Ratings
Votes
Personal Details
Biography
Quotes
Trivia
Other Works
Awards
Message Board
Media
Photo Gallery
Resume
Publicity
News Articles
Web Sites
Now Showing
Titles for Sale
Contact
Clients/Coworkers
by STARmeter
by Company
by Relationship

Profession:

Producer /
STARmeter
Camera and Electrical Department /
Second Unit Director or Assistant Director

Known for:
Also Known As:

Self Medicated / Getting Played / Ed Gein:

The Butcher of Plainfield
Michael Feffer more

Born:

11 September 1968, USA (age 39)

News:

18 April 2007: 'Occupation' takes home

Golden Palm more

more

more

Current rank: 32,856

Click graph for more
detail
Update contact/agent

Filmography sorted by:

Production Status

Go

Jump to: Future Films Past Films & Videos Add IMDb Resume
Films In Production (1 title)
Salomaybe? - Line Producer, First Assistant Director

Past Films & Videos (44 titles)

Year
2008

Year

MOVIE
Meter
15,622

MOVIE
Meter

Status

Budget

Post-production

Budget

Dear Me - Co-producer, Director

2008

22,501

Chicago Massacre: Richard Speck (video) - Producer,

Director, Writer

2007

8,793

Drive Thru - Line Producer, Still Photographer

2007

3,414

Ed Gein: The Butcher of Plainfield (video) - Producer,

Director, Writer

2007

9,420

$1.5M

Grim Reaper (video) - Producer, Director

2007

7,496

$1M

Let the Game Begin - Line Producer (Los Angeles), First

Assistant Director (Los Angeles)

2007

9,856

$2.5M

A Dead Calling (video) - Producer, Director, Mr.

Sullivan, Writer

2006

17,940

$1.5M

El Cortez - Line Producer (uncredited), Still

Photographer (uncredited)

2006

15,199

Are You Scared (video) - Producer, Still Photographer,

First Assistant Director

2006

7,534

The Butcher - Producer, Still Photographer, First

Assistant Director

2006

13,236

$750K

The Graveyard (video) - Producer, Director

2006

8,596

$2M

$1M

Opening US Box
Weekend Office

Getting Played - Co-producer, Line Producer, Still

Photographer

2005

7,009

Chandler Hall - Line Producer, Still Photographer, First

Assistant Director

2005

103,528

Self Medicated - Line Producer, Still Photographer, First

Assistant Director

2005

15,110

Lethal Eviction - Producer, Director

2005

30,463

$3M

Bound by Lies (video) - Line Producer, Still

Photographer

2005

24,345

$2M

The Kids Who Saved Summer (video) - Line Producer,

Still Photographer

2004

103,031

Workout with a Knockout (video) - Producer

2004

303,330

Galaxy Hunter - Line Producer, Still Photographer, First

Assistant Director

2004

46,787

There's Something About Meryl (short) - Line Producer,

Still Photographer, First Assistant Director

2004

51,853

Target - Line Producer, Still Photographer, First

Assistant Director

2004

31,671

The Silvergleam Whistle (short) - Producer

2003

159,695

The Killer Within Me (video) - Line Producer

2003

92,564

Would I Lie to You? (video) - Producer, First Assistant

Director

2002

34,731

The Mesmerist - Co-producer

2002

41,661

The Bike Squad - Producer, Still Photographer, Unit

Production Manager

2002

26,702

The Medicine Show - Producer

2001

67,009

Sensual Friends - Producer

2001

36,133

Choosing Matthias - Producer, First Assistant Director

2001

97,965

The Seductress (video) - Producer

2000

50,497

Illicit Lovers - Producer

2000

14,879

A Crack in the Floor - Producer, First Assistant Director

2000

35,411

One Small Hero - Producer

1999

79,911

Secret Pleasures - Producer, Post-production

Supervisor

1999

23,449

Dead by Dawn - Producer

1998

38,943

Forbidden Sins - Producer

1998

17,140

Witchcraft IX: Bitter Flesh - Producer, Actor

1997

63,469

Witchcraft 8: Salem's Ghost - Producer

1996

12,020

$200K
$60.2K

$2.5M

$98.8K

Witchcraft 7: Judgement Hour - Producer, Business

Man/Cop #5

1995

32,636

Witchcraft VI - Producer

1994

50,392

Witchcraft V: Dance with the Devil - Producer

1993

37,945

Sweet Evil (video) - Producer

1993

81,220

Divorce Law - Producer

1993

122,227

Fraternity Demon - Extra

1992

174,785

$1M

Biography

Michael Feifer has produced and line produced over 30 independent feature films ranging in
genres from horror to children's to comedy. He is known as someone who always makes a film
on-time, on-budget yet with a production quality that studio executives can't believe. Finally, in
2004, Mr. Feifer had an opportunity to combine his talents and skills and direct his first
feature... more

You may report errors and omissions on this page to the IMDb database
managers. They will be examined and if approved will be included in a
future update. Clicking the 'Update' button will take you through a
step-by-step process.
Subscriber Agreement | Contact IMDb | Corporate Accounts | Handheld/PDA | Content Licensing | Resume | Privacy Policy | Copyright | Cancel

Site Index

All

Search

Go!

| Your Account | Help | Log Out

| Advanced Search

Company Directory | People Directory | In Production | STARmeter | Box Office | News | Calendar | Message Boards
BREAKING NEWS: Golden Globes Ceremony, Parties Canceled more

Barnholtz Entertainment [us]

Main Details

Filmography In Production

Clients

Staff

Branch Offices Company Connections

Main Details

COMPANYmeter

Filmography
Summary
by Year
by Job
by Title Type
by Genre
by Keyword
by Budget
by Box Office
by Ratings
by Votes

Contact:

Type:

Distributor / Production

In Production

Staff:

Barry Barnholtz / Melvin Butters / Matthew Fladell / Will Santa Cruz (7 total) more

Branches:

Calabasas, CA / more

Clients
by Contact
by Relationship
by STARmeter
Staff
by Branch
by Occupation
by STARmeter
Branch Offices
Company Connections
Staff Connections

Staff Connections

Calabasas, CA:
23480 Park Sorrento, Ste. 217-A
Calabasas, CA 90265
USA
Phn: 818-591-1900
Fax: 818-591-5960
bbarnholtz@aol.com

Filmography sorted by:

Production Status

Current Rank: 3,367

Go

Jump to: Future Films Past Films & Videos Past Television Other
Films In Production (1 title)
Beyond the Ring - Distributor (2007) (USA) (all media)

Past Films & Videos (36 titles)

Year
2008

Year

MOVIE
Meter
3,855

MOVIE
Meter

Status

Budget

Completed

Budget

Death on Demand - Distributor (2007) (USA) (all media) (sales agent)

2008

61,271

$250K

The Wrath - Distributor (2008) (USA) (all media)

2008

71,053

$500K

Lost Signal - Distributor (2008) (USA) (DVD)

2007

27,318

$2M

Brutal (video) - Distributor (2007) (worldwide) (all media)

2007

7,211

Chicago Massacre: Richard Speck (video) - Distributor (2007) (USA) (DVD)

2007

8,793

$1M

Ed Gein: The Butcher of Plainfield (video) - Distributor (2007) (USA) (DVD)

2007

9,420

$1.5M

A Dead Calling (video) - Distributor (2007) (USA) (DVD)

2006

17,940

$1.5M

Blackwater Valley Exorcism (video) - Distributor (2006) (USA) (DVD)

2006

29,476

$1M

Grad Night - Distributor (2005) (USA) (all media)

2006

9,834

$500K

Summer Love - Distributor (2008) (USA) (theatrical)

2006

15,609

After Sundown (video) - Distributor (2005) (USA) (DVD)

2006

26,883

$80K

Raising Jeffrey Dahmer - Distributor (2007) (USA) (all media)

2006

43,313

$250K

Heebie Jeebies (video) - Distributor

2005

68,225

The Mangler Reborn (video) - Distributor (2005) (USA) (DVD), Production Company

2005

22,196

GhostWatcher 2 (video) - Distributor (2005) (USA) (DVD)

2005

66,373

Strange as Angels - Distributor (2005) (USA) (DVD)

2005

64,061

The Slaughterhouse Massacre (video) - Distributor

2005

38,657

Transamerican Killer (video) - Distributor (2004) (USA) (video)

2005

43,534

Murder-Set-Pieces - Distributor

2004

9,701

$200K

$250K

$2M

Opening US Box
Weekend Office

Dead Doll (video) - Distributor

2004

42,553

$485K

Party Animalz (video) - Distributor

2004

45,321

$200K

Jennifer's Shadow - Distributor

2004

49,783

$1M

Arrangement - Production Company (presents)

2004

18,050

$3.2M

The Jackhammer Massacre - Distributor

2004

53,523

Family Reunion: The Movie (video) - Distributor

2003

79,069

Loco Love - Distributor

2003

36,123

Bloody Streetz (video) - Distributor

2003

117,801

GhostWatcher - Distributor

2002

60,422

Kingston High - Distributor

2002

112,207

Drive by (video) - Production Company

2002

143,096

Altered Species - Distributor

2001

46,373

'R Xmas - Production Company

2001

19,418

The Mangler 2 (video) - Production Company

2001

9,814

Da Hip Hop Witch (video) - Distributor

2000

26,260

The First 9 1/2 Weeks - Production Company (in association with)

1998

18,757

Uninvited - Distributor (2006) (USA) (DVD)

1993

128,593

Past Television (8 titles)

Year

$4M

MOVIE
Meter

User
Rating

User
Votes

Santa Baby (TV movie) - Distributor (2007) (USA) (DVD)

2006

9,047

5.4

152

They Are Among Us (TV movie) - Distributor

2004

28,166

3.9

246

The Legend of Butch & Sundance (TV movie) - Distributor (2008) (USA) (DVD)

2004

27,863

4.8

50

The Friends of Jesus - Thomas (TV movie) - Distributor (2004) (USA) (DVD)

2001

169,710

6.0

17

The Friends of Jesus - Judas (TV movie) - Distributor (2004) (USA) (DVD)

2001

103,765

6.6

12

The Friends of Jesus: Mary Magdalene (TV movie) - Distributor (2004) (USA) (DVD)

2000

86,853

6.2

29

Joseph of Nazareth (TV movie) - Distributor (2004) (USA) (DVD)

2000

129,358

5.8

41

Drug Wars: The Camarena Story (TV mini-series) - Distributor

1990

22,919

6.2

232

Other (1 title)

Year

Cutthroat Alley (music video) - Distributor, Production Company

2003

MOVIE
Meter

User
Rating

61,151

1.8

User
Votes
204

You may report errors and omissions on this page to the IMDb database managers. They will be examined
and if approved will be included in a future update. Clicking the 'Update' button will take you through a
step-by-step process.
Subscriber Agreement | Contact IMDb | Corporate Accounts | Handheld/PDA | Content Licensing | Resume | Privacy Policy | Copyright | Cancel

Wood Dickinson
Producer
Currently Wood Dickinson is the producer and co-founder of the Kansas City based
feature film production company, Renegade Pictures, LLC.
Prior to taking on this challenge Wood spent 20 years working for then helming
Dickinson Theatres, a Midwest based motion picture exhibition company founded by his
grandfather in 1920.
When Dickinson took over Dickinson Theatres, the organization faced the same
challenge as the rest of the industryan over-abundance of movie screens, especially in
major metro markets such as Kansas City. Part of Dickinsons reign at Dickinson
Theatres included steering the company through a major reorganization in 1998.
Dickinson employed the principles from the 7 Habits to create a new principle-centered
organization founded on trust and open communication. The right combination of
downsizing in the corporate office and scaling back operations throughout the company
put the company back on a growth track. His efforts to reinvent his company were
profiled in Living the 7 Habits by Stephen R. Covey, 1999. In September 2000, he sold
his interest in Dickinson Theatres to a group of top Dickinson executives
Dickinson graduated from Texas Christian University with a Bachelor of Fine Arts in
Communications and a Master of Arts in Film. Wood, his wife Patti, and their eight
children enjoy Scouting, tennis, sailing and family togetherness. He is also a published
poet and an accomplished photographer.