Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ABSTRACT
AMR (Adaptive Multi-Rate) is an emerging speech codec cellular standard in ETSI [I]. This standard should be ready during
1998 as a Speech GSM evohtion. It is a new concept for achieving a high speech quality maintaining an efficient spectrum
usage. According to the channel quality and the traffic load, the
radio resource algorithm allocates a half-rate or a full-rate channel in order to obtain the best balance between quality and capacity. Within this channel, the codec is quickly adapted to track
changes in the radio link. An AMR system model has been developed to show the impact on speech quality by varying the capacity from only full-rate channels to only half-rate channels. The
aim is also to show the gain provided by an AMR system compared with an existing GSM system using second generation EFR
(Enhanced Full Rate) and HR (Half Rate) coders. The results
show that there is a trade-off between capacity increase and
speech quality degradation. It is also very clear that there is a
potential gain in quality by using AMR compared to existing
speech codecs in GSM systems.
I. INTRODUCTION
GSM is a worldwide success with more than 100 million wireless
subscribers. This number will probably grow to 600 million by
the beginning of the next millennium. Speech will remain one of
the most important services. The challenge for the operator is to
enhance the speech quality and at the same time to optimize spectrum efficiency particularly j n large urban areas where subscriber
density is very high.
This can be obtained using AMR (Adaptive Multi-Rate) as it has
been shown during the study phase at ETSI [l]. According to
their plan, the first release of AMR specifications should be ready
in february 1999.
power control, has been used. The general system behavior when
an AMR coder is used to switch between and within Half-Rate
(HR) and Full-Rate (FR) traffic channels is assessed. Then, the
speech quality obtained using this AMR system is compared with
an existing system using HR (GSM-HR codec) and FR (GSMEFR codec) channels for an equivalent capacity.
.
channel
modes
1
handover
~A
1(
3Lodecmodes
~A
Authorized licensed use limited to: IEEE Xplore. Downloaded on January 14, 2009 at 16:49 from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
I A
yes
,
CA [de]
AMR handover
HR/FR
measurements
Simulator
Vest
Figure 4.
In this study, the AMR handover decision, i.e. the choice between
HR and FR, is based on C/I. For each of the channel modes, the
1536
Authorized licensed use limited to: IEEE Xplore. Downloaded on January 14, 2009 at 16:49 from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
V. RESULTS
Only the speech quality for uplink is shown in the following
chapters. However, the results obtained on the downlink are very
similar. Comparable results can be found in [3] where the mean
speech quality versus the number of user per cell is plotted for
gross rate link adaptation.
A.
I
thrzhold
th!eshold
%fiat
B. Traflc description
The general radio network simulator models the performance of a
basic GSM system with a rlelatively large number of traffic channels. The amount of offered traffic is adjusted depending on three
parameters: the number of servers in the system (32 FR servers in
our system), the desired proportion of half-rate channels
(depends on the wanted capacity) and the blocking rate (2%
used). The traffic load is set to get all the different capacities in
the system from all the channels in FR mode to all the channels in
HR mode. A certain capacity corresponds to a certain proportion
of HR/FR channels. So, by moving the channel mode switching
threshold, different proportion HR/FR channels, i.e. capacities,
can be obtained. The different capacities are comparable by keeping the blocking rate constant in all the simulations. More traffic
considerations can be found in [2].
C. Parameters set-up
A Radio Network simulation tool is used to simulate a system
21'
'
1.25
1.5
1.75
Relallve capacity
1537
Authorized licensed use limited to: IEEE Xplore. Downloaded on January 14, 2009 at 16:49 from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
In Figure 6, the average uplink speech quality (over all the speech
quality reports from the different calls resulting from each simulation) is plotted versus the relative capacity. As a reference the
average quality of the AMR coder only operating on the FR
channel achieves a quality slightly under 27 dBQ. As the relative
capacity increases, the average speech quality is monotonously
decreased. At a 50% capacity increase, the average quality is
decreased by approximately 3 dBQ compared to only using AMR
in the FR channel. The average speech quality of the AMR coder
operating on the HR channel is under 22 dBQ.
In Figure 7, speech quality pdf at different percentiles of the
speech quality distribution in the system are plotted as a function
of relative capacity. The percentiles can (for simplicity) be interpreted as the proportion of users experiencing the corresponding
quality or worse.
1
....,#.................
' . , . ,. .......~
12
10
. . . ... . .
. . . . . , ., .. , . . ...,
. .,. . . ..
'.
. . . .:.
..
..
..;\'
..
0.
"
2.25
1.5
1.75
Relativecapaclly
. ...
. . ..." ................... .... . .... , ..... . ....... . . ... . , . . .. , .., ........ , , , ... .. ,.. ...,.. ..... . .
1.25
1.5
1.75
Relallve capadty
..:.......... .......:...._.............;....,...........
(.:
1.25
2.25
quality.
8'
'
1.25
1.5
1.75
Relative capaclty
1538
Authorized licensed use limited to: IEEE Xplore. Downloaded on January 14, 2009 at 16:49 from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
2.25
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors wish to thank Erik Ekudden for his support and the
presentation of these results he made at ETSI and Anders
Uvliden for his active participation in this work.
REFERENCES
ETSI TC SMG, AMR Study Phase Report verl.O,
Budapest, October, 1997, Meeting no. 23, TD -197.
-5
6
125
15
1 75
J. Dunlop, P. Cosimini, G. Graham, E. Le Strat Estimation of the performance of an adaptive air interface
in mobile radio, Proc. RACE Mobile Telecommunications Workshop, Amsterdam, 17-19 May 1994, pp. 4751
2 25
Relalive c a ~ c l N
VI. CONCLUSION
The AMR system capacity increase has been evaluated in a simulation model. As expected, a1 trade-off between capacity increase
and quality degradation is possible. For moderate capacity
increases the reduction of quality is noticed mostly by users in
high quality situations. The average quality in the system is
slightly lowered. The quality for users in low quality areas is significantly reduced for capacity increase exceeding approximately
80%.
In general, in a situation where both channel modes (half-rate and
full-rate) are used, there is potentially a large gain in quality with
AMR, compared to what can be achieved by allocating existing
GSM-EFR and GSM-HR cotlecs.
The AMR handover rates have to be limited to a reasonable number. The simulations show irhat the impact on quality is quite
small by limiting this rate. It is likely that this reduction has less
1539
Authorized licensed use limited to: IEEE Xplore. Downloaded on January 14, 2009 at 16:49 from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.