Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Prepared by:
Reviewed by:
Reviewed by:
Authors
Date
Raghuvir Tomar
21 July,
2014
st
Place
LNMIIT
Jaipur,
India
Revision History
Revision Date
001
Description
Initial draft
______________________________________________________________________________________
Table of Contents
1
1.1
1.2
DEFINITIONS ................................................................................................. 2
2.1
Radiation .............................................................................................................. 2
2.2
Irradiation ............................................................................................................. 2
2.3
Antenna ................................................................................................................ 2
4.
5.
a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
f.
g.
h.
6.
a.
7.
8.
______________________________________________________________________________________
ii
10.
______________________________________________________________________________________
iii
FREQUENCY BANDS
Nomenclature 1 (TRADITIONAL)
BAND
Extremely Low Frequency (ELF)
Very Low Frequency (VLF)
Low Frequency (LF)
Medium Frequency (MF)
High Frequency (HF)
Very High Frequency (VHF)
Ultra High Frequency (UHF)
Super High Frequency (SHF)
Extremely High Frequency (EHF)
1.2
FREQUENCY
RANGE
<3KHz
3KHz-30KHz
30KHz-300KHz
300KHz-3MHz
3MHz-30MHz
30MHz-300MHz
300MHz-3GHz
3GHz-30GHz
30GHz-300GHz
WAVELENGTH RANGE
>100Km
10Km-100Km
1Km-10Km
100m-1Km
10m-100m
1m-10m
10cm-1m
1cm-10cm
1mm-1cm
Nomenclature 2 (RADAR-BASED)
FREQUENCY
RANGE
1GHz-2GHz
2GHz-4GHz
4GHz-8GHz
8GHz-12GHz
12GHz-18GHz
18GHz-26.5GHz
26.5GHz-40GHz
33GHz-50GHz
40GHz-60GHz
50GHz-75GHz
60GHz-90GHz
75GHz-110GHz
90GHz-140GHz
110GHz-170GHz
WAVELENGTH RANGE
_____________________________________________________________________________________
DEFINITIONS
Radiation
/ t)
Irradiation
Antenna
An antenna is the device which converts non-radiating (that is, guided) electromagnetic
energy into radiated electromagnetic energy.
3
Radiation can be visualized as the propagation (or moving away) of an effect in all
directions, from the source.
The universe has decided (for some unfathomable reasons) that the disturbance of electric
and magnetic fields due to a moving (or accelerating) electric charge will propagate
away from the charge at the speed of light (c=300,000,000 Km/sec in vacuum). Once the
charge accelerates, the fields need to re-align themselves although they will prefer not to
_____________________________________________________________________________________
have to do so. The re-alignment effect will be felt with greater and greater time-delay as
we go further and further away from the charge, the speed at which the disturbance
travels being equal to c.
4. CONSTITUTIVE RELATIONSHIPS
The two constitutive relationships that govern the electromagnetic behavior of a
given non-conducting material (whether free-space, dielectric medium, or magnetic
medium) are
B=H
(1.1)
D=*E
(1.2)
=0r
(1.3)
(1.5)
where r is the relative permittivity (dielectric constant) of the medium and 0, the
permittivity of free-space, is given by
0=(1/(36*))*10-9 Farad/m
(1.6)
(1.7)
where is the conductivity of the medium, and E is the incident field that causes a surface
current density, J (in A/m2), on the surface of the conductor.
Eq. (1.7) can easily be derived, at least in the case of a rectangular bar made of material with
finite electrical conductivity, by using Ohms law.
_____________________________________________________________________________________
5. MAXWELLS EQUATIONS
The four Maxwells equations are reproduced below. Please note that bold letters
represent vectors and a dot on top represents ( / t). All possible variations of the four
Maxwellian equations are shown. The last few variations shown (in case of each of the
equations) are for the case when ejt type of time-dependence is assumed (a very
practically used case).
a.
v(t)= - ( t)
(1.8)
In eq. (2.1.1),v(t) is the induced emf and is the magnetic flux whose rate of
change with time is producing v(t). We can rewrite equation (1.8) as
E.dl
B.dS
(1.9)
where the left hand side (LHS) equates the induced emf to the line integral of the
corresponding electric field (E) and the right hand side (RHS) equates the magnetic flux
to the surface integral of the corresponding magnetic flux density (B). S represents a
two-dimensional surface enclosed by a closed contour C.
Now let us use Stokes theorem
A.dl (curlA).dS
(1.10)
- ( B/ t)
(M1)
which is the first Maxwellian equation in its differential form. We can re-write this
equation in several other forms, as shown below. As already mentioned, the dot on top of
a mathematical quantity represents the time-derivative of that quantity.
.
XE=
-B
(M1.1)
= - ( H/ t)
(M1.2)
_____________________________________________________________________________________
= - r ( H/ t)
(M1.3)
.
=-
(M1.4)
.
=-
r H
= - r( H/ t)
= - jrH
(M1.6)
= - jB
(M1.8)
(M1.5)
(M1.7)
Note that the last two representations (M1.7 and M1.8) are applicable only when
jt
b.
H.dl I
(1.11)
Let us now use Stokes theorem (eq. 1.10) to convert eq. (1.11) into
XH=
(1.12)
where J represents the surface current density (in A/m2) associated with I.
Eq. (1.12) is good enough when interactions between time-varying electric and
magnetic fields can be assumed to be negligible. As frequency increases, this, however,
becomes less and less of a safe bet. Maxwells genius lied in suggesting (based on
intuitive reasoning which was later verified experimentally) that an additional term be
added to the RHS of eq. (1.12) to account for the fact that time-varying E gives rise to
effects in total H. Eq. (1.12) was thus modified to
XH=
( D/ t)+J
(M2)
where the first term on the RHS represents the so-called displacement-current density
(in A/m2) that was added-in by Maxwell (for an interesting up-to-date view of
displacement current please visit http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Displacement_current).
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Eq. (M2) is the second Maxwellian equation in its differential form. We can write
this equation in several other forms too, as shown below.
.
XH=
D+J
= ( E/ t) + J
= r( E/ t) + J
(M2.1)
(M2.2)
(M2.3)
.
=
E + J
(M2.4)
.
rE + J
= r( E/ t) + J
= jrE + J
(M2.5)
= jD + J
(M2.8)
(M2.6)
(M2.7)
Note that the last two representations (M2.7 and M2.8) apply only when ejt type of
time-dependence is assumed for both E and H vectors.
c.
The third Maxwells equation is derivable from Gausss law which states that the
net electric flux passing through a closed surface S is equal to the total electric charge Q
enclosed by that surface. In other words,
D.dS Q
(1.13)
A.dS ( DivA)dV
S
(1.14)
_____________________________________________________________________________________
( DivD)dV Q dV
V
(1.15)
In eq. (1.15), represents the volume charge density in C/m3. This equation easily yields
.D=
(M3)
d.
(M4)
by assuming, without any loss of generality, that the constant involved can be assumed to
be zero.
Eq. (M4) is the fourth Maxwellian equation in its differential form.
-( /
t)
(1.16)
(1.17)
By using Stokes and Divergence theorems, the four Maxwells equations can also
be integrated and converted into their equivalent integral representations given below.
_____________________________________________________________________________________
E.dl
H .dl
C
B.dS
t S
(M.I.1)
D.dS I
t
S
(M.I.2)
D.dS dV
(M.I.3)
B.dS 0
(M.I.4)
g. Types of media
The various types of transmission media encountered in practice are briefly discussed
below.
1. Homogeneous and non-homogeneous media
_____________________________________________________________________________________
D E
B H
(1.18)
(1.19)
where [D], [E], [B], and [H] are 3x1 matrices and [] and [] are 3x3 matrices.
_____________________________________________________________________________________
6. Time-varying potentials
For a static volume charge distribution (r), the electric scalar potential V ( r) is given
by
(1.20)
where the integration is carried out over the entire volume over which the charge is
distributed, and R,r, and r are defined in Figure 1.
Figure 1 Definitions
Note that the vector r denotes the position vector of the elemental volume over which
the charge is being considered, and is called the source-coordinate. Vector r, on the
other hand, denotes the position vector of the point of observation. Vector R denotes the
difference between r and r, that is
(1.21)
R=r-r
Similarly, for a static volume current distribution J(r), the magnetic vector potential
A(r) is given by
(1.22)
where the following definition for A has been used:
B=
XA
(1.23)
_____________________________________________________________________________________
10
For radiation to happen, as has already been pointed out, both charge distribution and
current distribution have to be time-varying quantities. Intuitively, we thus modify eqs.
(1.20) and (1.22) to
B/ t)
(1.28)
we can write
XE=-(
t)
(1.29)
A/ t)] =0
(1.30)
XA)/
That is
X [E+(
Hence we define
E+( A/ t)] =- V
(1.31)
That is
_____________________________________________________________________________________
11
E = -( A/ t)] - V
(1.32)
E= - V
(1.33)
D/ t)+J
(1.34)
A-(
A/ t )=
( .A)+
( V/ t)-J
(1.35)
Then use
.D=
(1.36)
V+
. ( A/ t) = - /
(1.37)
Eqs. (1.35) and (1.37) represent the two coupled differential equations for the unknown
potentials A and V. It has been shown that the following condition needs to be
additionally satisfied if solutions involving retarded potentials are desired.
( .A) = - ( V/ t)
(1.38)
Eq. (9.17) is known as Lorentz Gauge condition. Using this equation, eqs. (1.35) and
(1.37) become
2
A-(
A/ t )= -J
V/ t )= - /
(1.39)
and
2
V-(
(1.40)
_____________________________________________________________________________________
12
Eqs. (1.39) and (1.40) represent the two independent equations for the two unknown
potentials A and V. It can be shown that the intuitively constructed solutions given by
eqs. (1.26) and (1.27) do indeed satisfy the above two equations (see section 10.10 of
Jordan and Balmains book).
b. Potential functions for the sinusoidally time-varying case
In this case, eqs. (1.39) and (1.40) become
2
A + k A= -J
(1.41)
and
2
V + k V= - /
(1.42)
_____________________________________________________________________________________
13
Since the length of the dipole is assumed to be along the z-axis, the magnetic vector
potential will have only a z-component. An application of eq. (1.43) yields
(1.45)
In carrying out the volume integration of the current density, the following logic is used:
The result of integration of J over the dipoles cross-section is just the current I.
Moreover, since I is constant over dl, the result of integration along z is simply Idl.
Also note that the antenna is assumed to be centered at the origin of the co-ordinate
system. This means
(1.46)
r=0
and
(1.47)
R=r
It is also easy to show that
Ar=Azcos
(1.48)
_____________________________________________________________________________________
14
A =-Azsin
(1.49)
A =0
(1.50)
Since the antenna is symmetrical in the plane, we can also assume that neither A nor
any of the field components varies with That is,
A/
Hr=0
(1.52)
H=0
(1.53)
and
H= [Idlsin/(4)][exp(-jr)][ (jr)r
(1.54)
D/ t)+J
(1.55)
to derive expressions for the various components of the lectric field. We get
Er=[2Idlcos/(4j)][exp(-jr)][ (jr2)r
(1.56)
(1.57)
E = 0
(1.58)
a. Far-field expressions
In the radiated field equations derived above, the (1/r) terms constitute the far-field
whereas the complete (1/r)+(1/r2)+(1/r3)+ terms constitute the near field.
_____________________________________________________________________________________
15
Generally, we are concerned with far-fields only. Thus neglecting the (1/r2) and (1/r3)
terms, the field expressions for the radiatied field of an infinitesimally small dipole
antenna become
Er=0
(1.59)
E=H
(1.60)
E = 0
(1.61)
Hr=0
(1.62)
H=0
(1.63)
H= [Idlsin/(4)][exp(-jr)][ (jr)
(1.64)
b. Radiated Power
Radiated power can be computed by first finding the average Poynting vector and then
integrating its radial component Pravg over a spherical surface centered at the element
(see Figure 3).
Pravg=(2/2r2)I2dl2sin2/(162)
(1.65)
The elemental area will be taken as the area of a strip on the surface of the sphere as
shown in Figure 3. That is
_____________________________________________________________________________________
16
da=2r2sind
(1.66)
After integrating the product of Pravg and da over =0 to =, the total far-field radiated
power can be shown to be given by
(1.67)
where
Ieff=I/sqrt(2)
(1.68)
Prad=Rrad Ieff2
(1.69)
whereby the radiation resistance of the infinitesimally dipole antenna turns out to be
(1.70)
17
field, the effects of the gorund plane can be incorporated by bringing in an image of the
physical antenna on the other side of the ground plane as shown in Figure 4b.
Az=[/(8)] [Il{exp(-jr)}/r ]
(1.71)
Note that one has to integrate I(z)dz from z=-l/2 to z=l/2 to get to this result (see class
notes for more details).
After this, the rest of the analysis runs along lines similar to those followed for the
infinitesimally-small antenna. We can show that, for far fields,
Er=0
(1.72)
E=H
(1.73)
E = 0
(1.74)
Hr=0
(1.75)
_____________________________________________________________________________________
18
H=0
(1.76)
H= [Ilsin/(8)][exp(-jr)][ (jr)
(1.77)
(1.78)
Note that, compared to the infinitesimally-small dipole, a factor of four has come in, in
the formula for the radiation resistance.
c. Radiation field of the elementary monopole
Eqs. (9.50)-(9.55) would still apply as long as we remember that the monopole would
radiate only in the upper hemisphere.
d. Radiation resistance of the elementary monpole
Because the total radiated power in this case is only for the upper half of the sphere, the
radiation resistance is given by
(1.79)
19
for z>0
for z<0
(1.80)
(1.81)
(1.82)
Assuming only far fields, we make the following simplifying approximations:
(1.83)
R=r-zcos ()
for the phase term in the numerator of the two integrands, and
(1.84)
R=r
in the denominator of the two integrands. Eq. (1.82) then yields
Az=[m/(4)][exp(-jr)/r][2/{sin2}][cos{Hcos}-cos(H)]
(1.85)
from which the six field components can be derived exactly as was done for the
infinitesimally-small dipole. Then, expressions for radiated power and radiation
resistance can also be worked out. The expression for radiated power involved the use of
numerical techniques as discussed below for a specific case (half-wave dipole).
b. Half-wave dipole
For a half-wave dipole,
H=/4
L=/2
(1.86)
(1.87)
20
Az=[m/(4)][exp(-jr)/r][2/{sin2}][cos/2)cos()}]
(1.88)
Using the same methodology that we used for the infinitesimally-small dipole, it can be
shown that, for far fields,
Er=0
(1.89)
E=H
(1.90)
E = 0
(1.91)
Hr=0
(1.92)
H=0
(1.93)
H= =[jm/(2)][exp(-jr)/r][cos/2)cos}]/[sin
(1.94)
The average Poynting vector can be shown to be
Pravg=[(m/(82r2)][cos2/2)cossin2]
(1.95)
After integrating the product of Pravg and da over =0 to =, the total far-field radiated
power can be shown to be given by
Prad ==[(m/(2)] I
(1.96)
I=
(1.97)
_____________________________________________________________________________________
21
Two
1). Use trapezoidal or Simpsons rule for numerical integration. Using trapezoidal rule
(5 degree intervals), the approximate value of I turns out to be 0.609. Please see pp. 330331 of Jordan and Balmains book for more details.
2). Transform I into an infinite series and then numerically sum that series. This way
too, the value of I turn out to be approximately equal to 0.609. Please see pp. 330-331 of
Jordan and Balmains book for more details.
Thus, the total far-field radiated power of a center-fed half-wave dipole turns out be
approximately given by
Prad ==[(0.609m/(2)]
(1.98)
Prad ==[(0.609eff/()]
(1.99)
The radiation resistance of the center-fed half-wave dipole thus can be written as
Rrad ==[(0.609/()]
(1.100)
Rrad ==[(0.609/(2)]
(1.101)
10.
Unsolved problems
22
_____________________________________________________________________________________
23