Associazione Studiosi Scienze Eterodosse

Monografie
di Altra Scienza
n.14
Febbraio 2007

Propulsione e Antigravit
(come costruire un disco volante)
I parte

Sommario
3
6
30
33
43

AA.VV. - Progetti Illustrati

William F. Hamilton III
Emidio Laureti
M.M.-Jean-Joseph Pages
Robert L. Cook

67
74
76
81
84

To the stars by electromagnetic propulsion

GCT Space
GIROSCOPIO PROPULSORE
David Croston
A Possible propulsion method for a UFO or future craft
Larry Maurer
Flying Colors

94
96
100
102
107

Franco Malgarini
Condensatore Dinamico Laserway
Peter Pan
Sigaro Volante a propulsione
M.J.G.Polonyi
PROPULSIONE ELETTROMAGNETICA AUTOSOSTENUTA
Robert A. Patterson - Quantum Electro-Gravitics
Vortex Implosion Based Propulsion Systems
P. Scarpa/Valeria Pistelli
Disco Volante di Augusto Rota

108
120
124
125
143

Joseph Misiolek
Haiko Lietz
Jaro
Paul E Potter
UFO Power

An Investigation of Negative Gravitational Propulsion

PNN
Brevetto
Inertial Propulsion Engine

LA MANIPOLAZIONE DELLO SPAZIO-TEMPO

Take a leap into hyperspace
3BTR
UFO Propagation

An Investigation of Negative Gravitational Propulsion

By William F. Hamilton III

Abstract: The repeated observations of unconventional flying objects in earths

atmosphere, their apparent ability to nullify the gravitational and inertial forces, the
alleged recovery of one or more of these objects for study, and testimony of reverse
engineering the advanced flight technology of these craft leads to speculation about the
principles of gravitational, electro-gravitational, and magneto-gravitational or in one
word negative gravitational methods of propulsion and how these principles may be
rediscovered. This paper addresses the need for a new model of physics that explains
the interaction and coupling of electric, magnetic, and gravitational fields, a unified
field theory that can lead to engineering novel space-time craft.
Background: The discoveries of physicist Townsend T. Brown in electro-gravitic
phenomena, and countless scientists, engineers, and inventors who have considered the
problem of gravity nullification as well as inertial nullification for the purpose of
propelling an object of any mass to unlimited velocities has been studied and
expounded on by a growing list of articles and books. New discoveries in solid-state
physics, fluid physics, ultra-cold domains of fluids and solids have all led to a growing
realization that new breakthrough discoveries are on the immediate horizon and a
collation of all this information toward the application of repeatable experiment and
discovery may lead to the development of ultra-fast fuel less space flight.
Dark Energy: Recent discoveries in cosmology that an anti-gravitational force exists
in the universe that is causing the acceleration of expansion since a specific
cosmological time in the history of the universe has led to a search for a new mysterious
form of energy that has been given the name dark energy.
Scientists have known since the 1920s that the universe is expanding, and they
discovered in the last year that the expansion is likely to go on forever. In recent
months, however, evidence has emerged to suggest that not only will the expansion
continue, it will accelerate. The only way to account for such acceleration is the
existence of a force to counteract the gravitational forces that would stabilize or shrink
the universe.

A news article refers to studies of dark energy by scientists at Princeton:

"The evidence is now getting stronger that there really is a force in the universe that
competes with gravity and causes repulsion instead of attraction," says Ostriker.
To account for this force, referred to as cosmic dark energy, scientists recently have
revived a concept called the cosmological constant. In their paper, the Princeton
scientists describe this cosmic dark energy as "a vacuum energy assigned to empty
space itself, a form of energy with negative pressure." Einstein first introduced the
cosmological constant in 1917, but later withdrew it, calling it the worst mistake of his
life. Understanding the source and nature of this force poses deep new problems for
physicists. "It's of very profound physical significance," says Ostriker.
The work to explain the source of this force already has begun. Steinhardt, a co-author,
recently introduced a possible new force called quintessence, which may account for the
dark energy.
However, dark energy studies are not going to lead us from the unknown to the
understanding of another unknown. We need to start from the known to find those
principles of the unknown.
Theory on Generating Dark Energy:
http://www.transproducts.net/kolman%20theory%20of%20negative%20energy.h
tm
A New Model of Matter: My idea revolves around the introduction of a new model of
matter. Matter is the seat of forces and atomic structure and function should reveal to
us the secrets of gravity, antigravity, electricity, and magnetism and how they function
according to some natural principle. This model does not need to elaborate an entire
theory of unification, but serve as our principal model for gravity-control technology.
The author considers that essential elements of this model include: the nature of space,
the nature of electric charge, the nature of magnetic moment and the interaction of
elementary particles of matter in the space medium. It is now known that space is not
an empty container and is filled with energetic activity that we now refer to as the ZPE
(Zero-Point Energy) which is herein considered to be activity in the space-ether
substance which serves as the substrate of space-time.
The remainder of this thesis consists of material I have already written and will integrate
into the present work with certain transitions from one idea to the next.
The Aether: Its an ancient concept revived in modern physics in the 19 th century,
disposed of by Einstein in the 20th century with the publication of his seminal paper,
On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies where he first proposed what is now
known as the Special Theory of Relativity, and now going through a second rebirth in
the 21st Century; the Aether returns as a fundamental ingredient in a Grand Unified
Theory.
Aether in Greek mythology was the personification of the upper sky, space and
heaven. He is the pure, upper air that the gods breathe, as opposed to aer which
mortals breathed. He was the son of Erebus, the Greek God of darkness who dwelt in
the underworld.

In physics and philosophy, aether was once believed to be a substance which filled all of
space. Aristotle included it as a fifth element on the principle that nature abhorred a
vacuum. Aether was also called Quintessence. The luminiferous aether of the better
known 19th century invocation was a concept held by some physicists and was an
attempt to reconcile electromagnetic theory and Newtonian physics.1
Einstein could sometimes speak as though the aether was superfluous (Einstein 1905)
and at other times say "space without aether is unthinkable" (Einstein 1922). This was
due, of course, to not starting with physical termsmatter its motion, and its
interactions (force).
Since the wide acceptance of the Special Theory of Relativity, scientists have generally
accepted the notion that the speed of light in vacuo is the upper limit of all material
speeds. For this reason, space travel greater than the speed of light is usually considered
unattainable except through special contrivance, which is used to alter the properties of
the space-time continuum. If the Special Theory of Relativity is correct, the speed of
light in vacuo is the only universal absolute. Another way of stating this principle is
that light or, more precisely, electromagnetic waves have no preferred frame of
reference. Often cited in support of this principle is reference to the classic MichelsonMorley interferometer experiment. This experiment was an attempt to measure the
earths motion through the hypothetical ether at rest in space. The negative result of
this experiment was used to prove that Einsteins proposition that the speed of light is
not altered by addition of velocities with light-emitting objects or that an ether was
necessary for explaining the propagation of light across empty space.
Professor Laro Schatzer has made this cogent statement regarding an ether frame:
There have been a variety of theories to describe electromagnetic waves (light) as
excitations of some medium, quite in analogy to sonic waves which propagate in the
medium air. This hypothetical medium was called the ether and it was supposed to be at
rest in the absolute space-time frame. That is why this frame is also called the ether
frame sometimes. Since the establishment of the theory of special relativity it has
become extremely unpopular among scientists to speak aboutether". However, we
know today that electromagnetic waves are indeed excitations of some "medium".
However, this medium is not a solid or a liquid in the classical sense, but it is governed
by the laws of quantum mechanics. Quantum field theorists found the name vacuum for
it. Some people interpret the vacuum as space-time itself, but this does not cover the
fact that its true nature still remains a mystery. Anyhow, the term quantum ether might
be used to indicate a possible modern synthesis of both concepts.
A number of scientists have now revived theories of the ether and a few have reanalyzed the Michelson and Morley experiment as well as pointing out positive results
from other experiments. Physicist Paul Marmet has written:
We show that Michelson and Morley used an over simplified description and failed to
notice that their calculation is not compatible with their own hypothesis that light is
traveling at a constant velocity in all frames. During the last century, the Michelson-

Morley equations have been used without realizing that two essential fundamental
phenomena are missing in the Michelson-Morley demonstration. We show that the
velocity of the mirror must be taken into account to calculate the angle of reflection of
light. Using the Huygens principle, we see that the angle of reflection of light on a
moving mirror is a function of the velocity of the mirror. This has been ignored in the
Michelson-Morley calculation. Also, due to the transverse direction of the moving
frame, light does not enter in the instrument at 90 degrees as assumed in the MichelsonMorley experiment. We acknowledge that, the basic idea suggested by MichelsonMorley to test the variance of space-time, using a comparison between the times taken
by light to travel in the parallel direction with respect to a transverse direction is very
attractive. However, we show here that the usual predictions are not valid, because of
those two classical secondary phenomena, which have not been taken into account.
When these overlooked phenomena are taken into account, we see that a null result, in
the Michelson-Morley experiment, is the natural consequence, resulting from the
assumption of an absolute frame of reference and Galilean transformations. On the
contrary, a shift of the interference fringes would be required in order to support
Einsteins relativity. Therefore, for the last century, the relativity theory has been based
on a misleading calculation.
Also, the ether drift experiments of Dayton Miller have received new attention and
seem to indicate a positive result for the existence of an ether.
Dayton Miller's 1933 paper in Reviews of Modern Physics details the positive results
from over 20 years of experimental research into the question of ether-drift, and remains
the most definitive body of work on the subject of light-beam interferometry. Other
positive ether-detection experiments have been undertaken, such as the work of Sagnac
(1913) and Michelson and Gale (1925), documenting the existence in light-speed
variations (c+v > c-v), but these were not adequately constructed for detection of a
larger cosmological ether-drift, of the Earth and Solar System moving through the
background of space. Dayton Miller's work on ether-drift was so constructed, however,
and yielded consistently positive results.
There seems to be a growing preponderance of evidence that a space ether medium
exists and that physical theories on gravitation, inertia, electromagnetism, and nuclear
forces as well as cosmological theories will need to take account of these. It is even
possible that an extensive revision of theoretical physics will be necessitated by these
discoveries, both old and new.
If a velocity-dependent medium such as the ether could be established by experiment,
then it could open the door to alternative explanations to SR and GR regarding physical
phenomena. If this ether is quantized, then we could explore the theoretical nature of a
quantum ether. Is gravity a result of some state of the quantum ether?
Does the quantum ether explain inertia? What does an electric or magnetic field do to
the state of the quantum ether? Are material particles some wave-state of the quantum
ether? Can we unify physical principles by considering a quantum ether?
A complete theory of the ether has been attempted but many such but these theories lack
the sweep and power of modern mathematical theories.
A complete theory of the ether would not only account for the origin of forces, but the

10

origin of matter and mass. Past theorizing has postulated the existence of circulating
flows in a hydrodynamic ether that form hollow or ring vortices that give rise to
electromagnetic forces and constitute the elementary particles that make-up the atomic
nature of the world. Experiments conducted on the alternating gradient synchrotron
with colliding protons seem to indicate that protons behave like composite vortices as
described by Helmholtz and others in their excellent treatises on hydrodynamics.
In 1897, the English physicist J.J. Thomson discovered the electron and proposed a
model for the structure of the atom. Thomson knew that electrons had a negative charge
and thought that matter must have a positive charge. His model looked like raisins stuck
on the surface of a lump of pudding. Rutherford thought that the negative electrons
orbited a positive center in a manner like the solar system where the planets orbit the
sun. Bohr came up with the first non-classical description of the electron in order to
explain why electrons do not lose energy and spiral into the nucleus of the atom.
Schrdinger pictured the electron as a standing wave. Physicist Max Born turned the
electron into a cloud of probability. Modern quantum theory treats the electron as a
point-particle with no specific structure or extension in space. The many versions of the
new String theories treat the electron as an extended 1-dimensional string or loop, and
some variations treat it as a 2-dimesional structure including a ring-like vortex
structure. Lord Kelvin was the first to propose a vortex ring as a model for the
electron. This seems to be undergoing a revival in new proposals in string theory, now
known as M-Theory.
One mainstream physicist who is raising waves about ether drift experiements and the
detection of absolute motion is Reginald T. Cahill of Flinders University in Adelaide,
Australia. On this centenary anniversary of Einsteins Special Theory of Relativity
(1905-2005), he has written a critical review of Einsteins postulates:
The Einstein postulates assert an invariance of the propagation speed of light in
vacuum for any observer, and which amounts to a presumed absence of any preferred
frame. The postulates appear to be directly linked to relativistic effects which emerge
from Einsteins Special Theory of Relativity, which is based upon the concept of a flat
space-time ontology, and which then lead to the General Theory of Relativity with its
curved space-time model for gravity. While the relativistic effects are well established
experimentally it is now known that numerous experiments, beginning with the
Michelson-Morley experiment of 1887, have always shown that the postulates
themselves are false, namely that there is a detectable local preferred frame of
reference. This critique briefly reviews the experimental evidence regarding the failure
of the postulates (of the Special Theory of Relativity), and the implications for
understanding of fundamental physics, and in particular for our understanding of
gravity
Nicola Tesla, the prodigal genius and inventor of the 19th and 20th century made this
statement:
"There manifests itself in the fully developed being , Man, a desire mysterious,
inscrutable and irresistible: to imitate nature, to create, to work himself the wonders he
perceives.... Long ago he recognized that all perceptible matter comes from a primary

11

substance, or tenuity beyond conception, filling all space, the Akasha or luminiferous
ether, which is acted upon by the life giving Prana or creative force, calling into
existence, in never ending cycles all things and phenomena. The primary substance,
thrown into infinitesimal whirls of prodigious velocity, becomes gross matter; the force
subsiding, the motion ceases and matter disappears, reverting to the primary
substance."
Tesla opposed Einsteins ideas and now he may be vindicated by new experiments,
including one to be performed in the International Space Station in 2007-2008 to detect
the absolute motion of the earth through the aether.
The new popular notion of the aether is embodied in the concept of Zero Point Energy
(ZPE) and the Zero Point Field (ZPF), however I have written that I believe ZPE is the
activity we detect in the Aether and not the Aether per se. My model of the Aether is of
a superfluid substance that constitutes physical space itself.
According to Barry C. Mingst, General Relativitys first postulate is that the source of
the gravitational field is the stress-energy tensor of a perfect fluid, T. T contains
four non-zero components. These four components are the density of the perfect fluid
and the pressure of the perfect fluid in each of the three physical axes. A perfect fluid in
general relativity is defined as a fluid that has no viscosity and no heat conduction. This
basically describes a superfluid.
French physicist Mayeul Arminjon in his Ether Theory of Gravitation: Why and How?
writes:
The first point is that, in order that it does not brake the motion of material bodies, the
physical vacuum or micro-ether must be some kind of a perfect fluid. A truly
perfect fluid is free from any thermal effect that is necessarily bound to dissipation,
hence, as noted by Romani , it must be perfectly continuous at any scale. It is then
characterized by its pressure and its density, which are connected by the state equation,
and by its velocity. It exerts only pressure forces. Therefore, if one attempts to
introduce a perfectly fluid ether filling empty space, then any interaction forces at a
distance, thus including gravity, have to be ultimately explained as pressure forces, and
hence as contact actions. As far as gravitation is concerned, this is quite simple. I
assume that elementary particles are extended objects. The resultant of the pressure
forces exerted on a particle is Archimedes thrust, that is proportional to the volume V
occupied by a given particle. In order that this force be actually proportional to the mass
m of the particle, it is hence necessary and sufficient that the average density inside a
given particle, thus p = m/V , be the same for all particlesat least at a given
(macroscopic) place and at a given time. However, since the gravitational attraction is a
field, the density p may also be a field, where the space-time variability has to come
from that of the pressure in the fluid, pe. In fact, as is suggested by the observed
transmutations of elementary particles into different ones, I assume that the particles
themselves are made of that microether: each of them should be some kind of organized
flow in this imagined fluidsomething like a vortex. (This is Romanis idea of a
constitutive ether . In that case, the density p would be nothing else than the local
density in the fluid, e = e(pe). Under these assumptions, the gravity acceleration is
obtained as : g = grad pe/e.

12

I think that Arminjon is taking the first steps toward a real unified theory which must be
based on the true properties of space. It is the density differentials of space and the
pressure waves (forces) of the ether that constitute a foundation for a complete theory of
matter and energy.
Combining the stress-energy tensor of pressure with the stress-energy tensor of mass
results in the stress-energy tensor for an ideal fluid
Tmn = (r 0 + p/c2)UmUn - gmnp

(1)

My suggestion is that the quantized vortices that form in a superfluid are those
that, in the space-ether superfluid, compose the elementary particles. The assembly and
aggregation of these vortices produce mass. Mass displaces the surrounding
unaggregated fluid which then exerts pressure against the mass. We can then combine
the stress-energy tensor of mass and pressure to arrive at equation (1).
In "Ether and Relativity", 1920, Sidelights on Relativity, page 23, Einstein writes:
Recapitulating, we may say that according to the general theory of relativity space is
endowed with physical qualities; in this sense, therefore, there exists an ether.
According to the general theory of relativity space without an ether is unthinkable; for
in such a space there would not only would be no propagation of light, but also no
possibility of existence for standards of space and time (measuring-rods and clocks), nor
therefore any space-time intervals in the physical sense. But this ether may not be
thought of as endowed with the quality characteristic of ponderable media, as consisting
of parts which may be tracked through time. The idea of motion may not be applied to
it.
Einstein admits that space is endowed with physical properties, as it must be in order to
conform to geometrical distortions and affirms that, in that sense, there is an ether, but
does not ascribe any motion to this ether. Since further developments postulated the
existence of gravitational waves, it is difficult to reconcile this early statement with
modern thinking on the subject.
The empty space within atoms or the distant spaces that separate galaxies is referred to
as the physical vacuum. The physical vacuum is considered far from empty. It is
seething with activity. Physicists describe a vacuum constantly boiling with virtual
particles that appear and disappear out of the depths of space. The Casimir Effect is
cited as experimental evidence of this activity in the physical vacuum.
More recent theorists Carlo Rovelli (University of Pittsburgh) and Lee Smolin
(Pennsylvania State University) completed their analysis of a quantum gravity model
developed by Abhay Ashtekar at Syracuse University in 1985. Unlike string theory,
Ashtekar's work applies only to gravity. However, it posits that at the Planck scale,

13

space-time dissolves into a network of "loops" that are held together by knots.
Somewhat like a chain-mail coat used by knights of yore, space-time resembles a fabric
fashioned in four dimensions from these tiny one-dimensional loops and knots of
energy.
These theories of the physical vacuum are based on theoretical work in quantum theory
and string theory, but may not necessarily be correct. There is room for other models
including a hydrodynamic model as postulated here.
Flowing Gravity is based on a general hypothesis that space has physical properties that
can best be described as super fluidic. By postulating the superfluid nature of space
problems in controlling gravity and inertia can be clearly approached. New
understandings in electromagnetic phenomena, nuclear and particle physics, cosmology,
and the basis of quantum mechanics may be clarified with this shift of emphasis. What
remains is to develop a more specific theory and a general theory that can make
predictions that are in accord with natural measurements and observations and to devise
experiments that can test the nature of the space medium.
A New Model of the Atom:
In aether theory, elementary particles are considered vortices. The electron is
considered to be either a toroidal vortex (a theory I favor) or a spherical vortex. The
proton and neutron are considered to be compound vortices composed of electron and
positron vortices. The vortex circulation creates a void core which reduces aetheric
pressure to a null state and produces an inward-directed aetheric static pressure from
ambient space which gives us gravitational and inertial force. The dynamic rotation of
the toroid produces an outward-directed dynamic pressure which gives us the electric
field while the circulation of the toroid produces an axial magnetic field. This is a
simplified version of a model which we will use to visualize field propulsion in a
saucer-shaped craft that utilizes this knowledge to produce a gravitationally-repulsive
force for propulsion.
Electron Ring Vortex Model: In 1897, the English physicist J.J. Thomson discovered
the electron and proposed a model for the structure of the atom. Thomson knew that
electrons had a negative charge and thought that matter must have a positive charge. His
model looked like raisins stuck on the surface of a lump of pudding. Rutherford
thought that the negative electrons orbited a positive center in a manner like the solar
system where the planets orbit the sun. Bohr came up with the first non-classical
description of the electron in order to explain why electrons do not lose energy and
spiral into the nucleus of the atom. Schrdinger pictured the electron as a standing
wave. Physicist Max Born turned the electron into a cloud of probability. Modern
quantum theory treats the electron as a point-particle with no specific structure or
extension in space. The many versions of the new String theories treat the electron as
an extended 1-dimensional string or loop, and some variations treat it as a 2-dimesional
structure including a ring-like vortex structure. Lord Kelvin was the first to propose a
vortex ring as a model for the electron. This seems to be undergoing a revival in new
proposals in string theory, now known as M-Theory.

14

The purpose of this paper is to propose an ether-vortex model of the electron as a

rotating toroidal ring vortex and a positron as a counter-rotating toroidal ring vortex that
is based on a synthesis of various other proposed models of particle physics that may
eventually be integrated into a unified theory.
The first attempt to construct a physical model of an atom was made by William
Thomson (later elevated to Lord Kelvin) in 1867. The most striking property of the
atom was its permanence.
Thompson wrote the following on Vortex Atoms 1
After noticing Helmholtz's admirable discovery of the law of vortex motion in a
perfect liquid -- that is, in a fluid perfectly destitute of viscosity (or fluid friction) -- the
author said that this discovery inevitably suggests the idea that Helmholtz's rings are the
only true atoms. For the only pretext seeming to justify the monstrous assumption of
infinitely strong and infinitely rigid pieces of matter, the existence of which is asserted
as a probable hypothesis by some of the greatest modern chemists in their rashlyworded introductory statements, is that urged by Lucretius and adopted by Newton -that it seems necessary to account for the unalterable distinguishing qualities of
different kinds of matter. But Helmholtz has provided an absolutely unalterable quality
in the motion of any portion of a perfect liquid in which the peculiar motion which he
calls "Wirbelbewegung" has been once created. Thus any portion of a perfect liquid
which has "Wirbelbewegung" has one recommendation of Lucretius's atoms -- infinitely
perennial specific quality. To generate or to destroy "Wirbelbewegung" in a perfect
fluid can only be an act of creative power. Lucretius's atom does not explain any of the
properties of matter without attributing them to the atom itself. Thus the "clash of
atoms," as it has been well called, has been invoked by his modern followers to account
for the elasticity of gases. Every other property of matter has similarly required an
assumption of specific forces pertaining to the atom. It is easy (and as improbable -- not
more so) to assume whatever specific forces may be required in any portion of matter
which possesses the "Wirbelbewegung," as in a solid indivisible piece of matter; and
hence the Lucretius atom has no prima facie advantage over the Helmholtz atom. A
magnificent display of smoke-rings, which he recently had the pleasure of witnessing in
Professor Tait's lecture-room, diminished by one the number of assumptions required to
explain the properties of matter on the hypothesis that all bodies are composed of vortex
atoms in a perfect homogeneous liquid. Two smoke-rings were frequently seen to bound
obliquely from one another, shaking violently from the effects of the shock. The result
was very similar to that observable in to large india-rubber rings striking one another in
the air. The elasticity of each smoke-ring seemed no further from perfection than might
be expected in a solid india-rubber ring of the same shape, from what we know of the
viscosity of india-rubber. Of course this kinetic elasticity of form is perfect elasticity for
vortex rings in a perfect liquid. It is at least as good a beginning as the "clash of atoms"
account for the elasticity of gases. Probably the beautiful investigations of D. Bernoulli,
Herapath, Joule, Krnig, Clausius, and Maxwell, on the various thermodynamic
properties of gases, may have all the positive assumptions they have been obliged to
make, as to mutual forces between two atoms and kinetic energy acquired by individual
atoms or molecules, satisfied by vortex rings, without requiring any other property in
the matter whose motion composes them than inertia and incompressible occupation of
space. A full mathematical investigation of the mutual action between two vortex rings
of any given magnitudes and velocities passing one another in any two lines, so directed
that they never come nearer one another than a large multiple of the diameter of either,
is a perfectly solvable mathematical problem; and the novelty of the circumstances

15

contemplated presents difficulties of an exciting character. Its solution will become the
foundation of the proposed new kinetic theory of gases. The possibility of founding a
theory of elastic solids and liquids on the dynamics of more closely-packed vortex
atoms may be reasonably anticipated. It may be remarked in connexion with this
anticipation, that the mere title of Rankine's paper on "Molecular Vortices,"
communicated to the Royal Society of Edinburgh in 1849 and 1850, was a most
suggestive step in physical theory.
Today, Thompsons vortex atom seems like a quaint piece of physics history and the
standard model of the electron assumes the electron to be a point-like particle without
extension in any dimension. However, it seems that the properties of an electron are
such that it is not reconciled by a point-like particle and for this reason string theory has
proposed that particles such as the electron are extended objects called strings. Whether
this is proven in the long run remains to be seen as there have been few tests of string
theory to allow us to believe that it is a description of the real world. With the negation
of the ether in modern physics, albeit it may be making a comeback, the electron as a
standing wave or vortex in the ethereal medium has generally been rejected, but now
needs to be reconsidered.
The Electron Ring Model:

From Model of the Electron by Ph.M. Kanarev.

Here is a table listing the properties of an electron:

Particle

Symbol

Antiparticle

Rest mass
MeV/c^2

L
(e)

L
(muon)

L
(tau)

Lifetime
(seconds)

Electron

e-

e+

0.511

+1

Stable

The ring model of an electron is derived from an ether vortex flow. This vortex creates

16

a pressure normal to its spin that is conjectured produces the electrostatic charge. The
magnetic pressure gradient is normal to the electrostatic pressure gradient and acts
along the central axis of spin. A vortex contains a low internal pressure, and a high
stream pressure. When the stream flows mesh, the particles will attract one another and
when they clash, will repel. The vortex field produces a pressure gradient that
diminishes with radius from the core boundary. The force between electric charges is
inversely proportional to the radius (sq) and directly proportional to the kinetic energy
(mv2) of one vortex times the kinetic energy of a paired vortex with the sign relative to
the circulation vectors.

From Model of the Electron by Ph.M. Kanarev.

To quote Mayeul Arminjon again:
I assume that the particles themselves are made of that microether: each of them
should be some kind of organized flow in this imagined fluidsomething like a vortex.
(This is Romanis idea of a constitutive ether).
The toroidal form of the electron vortex may be generated by the helical form of the
photonic wave that produces the electron in pair creation. The antimatter counterpart of
the electron, the positron, has a circulation in the opposite sense.
Barry Mingst has said,
A long time ago, Lord Kelvin (W. Thompson), Lorentz, Maxwell, and Hemholtz
recognized that the behavior of matter had characteristics similar to vortex ring
structures in a fluid (the atomic vortex hypothesis). This concept was abandoned in the
early 1900's. This abandonment was more philosophical than substantive with the real
problem being the math describing the model was, "at the time", intractable. Must more
success was being obtained by QM methods. This same model rears up again in modern
physics in the form of the mathematical topology of string/super string theory as well as
in superconductivity and superfluidity. Penrose's twistor is a vortex ring, as is a
magnetic field. It is interesting to note that vortex rings can sustain transverse vibrations

17

(analogous to guitar string vibration), indeed Kelvin proved mathematically that linear
disturbances in a saturated 3D vortex fluid (he termed a vortex sponge) would produce
propagation of pure transverse waves identical to the equations and properties that
describe the propagation of light through space. It was this relationship as well as many
others that caused this hypothesis to be considered seriously. It also is interesting to note
that Maxwell used this conceptual model as the basis for his derivation of the EM
relationships.
Conclusions:
There is little doubt that the Aether Theory of Space is experiencing a revival among
scientists especially in the light of further experiments and discoveries. The idea of a
universal substance-energy that lies at the root of all material manifestation is a
magnificent conception that conveys to the mind a unifying principle behind all physical
phenomena. Paralleling this revival is the concomitant reappraisal of particle vortex
theories. It is possible that we will see many new developments in the physics of the
21st century.
1. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, Vol. VI, 1867, pp. 94-105;
reprinted in Phil. Mag. Vol. XXXIV, 1867, pp. 15-24.
"Ether" or "Aether"?? The term for the cosmological medium, used by those
scientists of the 1800s and early 1900s most engaged with the question, was "ether"
with an "e". Sometime in the 1950s, the spelling was changed by ether-critics to
"aether" with an "a". This was done in part to remove confusion with the chemical fluid
ether as used for anesthesia, but mostly the replacement appears to have been
undertaken to relegate the ether of space into ancient history, as an unproven
speculation similar to Aristotelian elements of "fire, air, water and earth". I have used
the "Aether" spelling in the past myself, but now believe this form carries with it an
assumed disproof, that the cosmological medium or energy in space does not exist.
Since I fully accept the work of Dayton Miller as a proof of the existence of the ether,
use of the other term is no longer acceptable. Consequently, until some better evidence
or argument is put forth, I use the term used by Crookes, Lodge, Faraday, Michelson,
Moorley, Miller, Tesla, Reich and even by Einstein, spelled with an "e": ether
UFO Dynamics:
One of the fundamental forces studied in aerodynamics is lift, or the force that keeps an
airplane in the air. Airplanes fly because they push air down. The leading edge of an
airplane wing is higher than the trailing edge. All aircraft have wings or lifting bodies
or rotating blades as their lift depends on them. UFOs may not have wings and may
even have some unaerodynamic configuration. Lift is often explained using Bernoullis
principle, which relates an increase in the velocity of a flow of fluid (such as air) to a
decrease in pressure and vice versa. The air pressure on the upper side of an airplane
wing is lower than that on the lower side giving a resultant net force upward.
Another important aspect of aerodynamics is the drag, or resistance, acting on solid
bodies moving through air. The thrust force developed by either the jet engine or the
propellers, for example, must overcome the drag forces exerted by the air flowing over
the airplane. Streamlining the body can significantly reduce these drag forces. For
bodies that are not fully streamlined, the drag force increases approximately with the
square of the speed as they move rapidly through the air. The power required, for
example, to drive an automobile steadily at medium or high speeds is primarily
absorbed in overcoming air resistance.
Supersonics, an important branch of aerodynamics, concerns phenomena that arise

18

when the velocity of a solid body exceeds the speed of sound in the medium, usually air,
in which it is traveling. The speed of sound in the atmosphere varies with humidity,
temperature, and pressure. Because the speed of sound, being thus variable, is a critical
factor in aerodynamic equations, a so-called Mach number, named after the Austrian
physicist and philosopher Ernst Mach, who pioneered the study of ballistics, represents
it. The Mach number is the speed of the projectile or aircraft with reference to the
ambient atmosphere, divided by the speed of sound in the same medium and under the
same conditions. Thus at sea level, under standard conditions of humidity and
temperature, a speed of about 1220 km/h (about 760 mph) represents a Mach number of
one, that is, M-1. The same speed in the stratosphere, because of differences in density,
pressure, and temperature, would correspond to a Mach number of M-1.16. By
designating speeds by Mach number, rather than by kilometers or miles per hour, a
more accurate representation of the actual conditions encountered in flight can be
obtained.
Another factor, long known to rocket designers, is the direct influence of ambient
atmospheric pressures on the efficiency of the flight of planes in supersonic speed
ranges. That is, the closer the surrounding medium is to a perfect vacuum, the more
efficient is the power plant of the plane. Reducing the area, or cross section, displacing
atmosphere, can also increase the range of the supersonic plane. Increasing the weight
by increasing the length, but at the same time making the plane more slender and
equipping it with a needle nose, are necessary features of design for planes operating in
the supersonic range in the atmosphere.
Generally, UFOs seem to bend the rules when it comes to aerodynamics. The
maneuverability of discs seen in flight is such that the UFO accelerates so quickly that it
seems to overcome any forces of drag that would retard its movement. Discs have been
seen to make 90-degree turns instantly, and in some rare cases, instantly reverse their
direction of travel. When accelerating to speeds estimated to be supersonic, no shock
wave seems to be generated and no sonic boom is heard. Some maneuvers
accomplished by UFOs would place extraordinary stress on the airframe if flying like
conventional aircraft. Coming in contact with the surrounding atmosphere at high rates
of acceleration would challenge the structural integrity of the vehicle, would induce
enormous drag and heat the skin of the craft to glowing temperatures, but perhaps the
UFO does not come into direct contact with the atmosphere, but actually repels the
atmospheric boundary layer surrounding its form. This would account for how they can
move quickly without encountering air resistance and thermal stress.
Structural integrity is a major factor in aircraft design and construction. No production
airplane leaves the ground before undergoing extensive analysis of how it will fly, the
stresses it will tolerate and its maximum safe capability.
Every airplane is subject to structural stress. Stress acts on an airplane whether on the
ground or in flight. Stress is defined as a load applied to a unit area of material. Stress
produces a deflection or deformation in the material called strain. Stress is always
accompanied by strain.
Current production general aviation aircraft are constructed of various materials, the
primary being aluminum alloys. Rivets, bolts, screws and special bonding adhesives are
used to hold the sheet metal in place. Regardless of the method of attachment of the
material, every part of the fuselage must carry a load, or resist a stress placed on it.
Design of interior supporting and forming pieces, and the outside metal skin all have a
role to play in assuring an overall safe structure capable of withstanding expected loads
and stresses.
Engineers carefully calculate the stress a particular part must withstand. Also, the

19

material a part is made from is extremely important and is selected by designers based
on its known properties. Aluminum alloy is the primary material for the exterior skin on
modern aircraft. This material possesses a good strength to weight ratio, is easy to form,
resists corrosion, and is relatively inexpensive.
Fittings must be made of carefully selected materials because of their importance of
holding the aircraft together under expected stress and loading. The same holds true for
important fasteners such as bolts and rivets. It is essential that these parts not fail under
stress. It is also essential that these parts not weaken with exposure to stress and weather
elements.
UFOS have been observed that seem to have seamless, rivetless hulls which could give
such a craft high structural integrity.
Corrosion is also a consideration. A fitting made of one metal cannot be secured to the
structure with a bolt or fastener made of another metal. This situation may result in
"dissimilar metal corrosion" over a period of time and result in a weakening of the
assembly to the extent that the assembly is rendered unsafe.
Types Of Structural Stress
The five basic structural stresses to which aircraft are subject are:
1.

Tension

2.

Compression

3.

Torsion

4.

Shear

5.

Bending

While there are many other ways to describe the actual stresses, which an aircraft
undergoes in normal (or abnormal) operation, they are special arrangements of these
basic ones.
"Tension" is the stress acting against another force that is trying to pull something apart.
For example, while in straight and level flight the engine power and propeller are
pulling the airplane forward. The wings, tail section and fuselage, however, resist that
movement because of the airflow around them. The result is a stretching effect on the
airframe. Bracing wires in an aircraft are usually in tension.
"Compression" is a squeezing or crushing force that tries to make parts smaller. Anticompression design resists an inward or crushing force applied to a piece or assembly.
Aircraft wings are subjected to compression stresses. The ability of a material to meet
compression requirements is measured in pounds per square inch (psi).
"Torsion" is a twisting force. Because aluminum is used almost exclusively for the
outside, and, to a large extent, inside fabrication of parts and covering, its tensile
strength (capability of being stretched) under torsion is very important. Tensile strength
refers to the measure of strength in pounds per square inch (psi) of the metal. Torque
(also a twisting force) works against torsion. The torsional strength of a material is its
ability to resist torque. While in flight, the engine power and propeller twist the forward
fuselage. The force, however, is resisted by the assemblies of the fuselage. The airframe
is subjected to variable torsional stresses during turns and other maneuvers.
"Shear" stress tends to slide one piece of material over another. Consider the aircraft
fuselage. The aluminum skin panels are riveted to one another. Shear forces try to make
the rivets fail under flight loads; therefore, selection of rivets with adequate shear
resistance is critical. Bolts and other fasteners are often loaded in shear, an example
being bolts that fasten the wing to the spar or carry-through structure. Although other

20

forces may also be present, shear forces try to rip the bolt in two. Generally, shear
strength is less than tensile or compressive strength in a particular material.
"Bending" is a combination of two forces, compression and tension. During bending
stress, the material on the inside of the bend is compressed and the outside material is
stretched in tension. An example of this is the G-loading an airplane structure
experiences during maneuvering. During an abrupt pull-up, the airplane's wing spars,
wing skin and fuselage undergo positive loading and the upper surfaces are subject to
compression, while the lower wing skin experiences tension loads. There are many
other areas of the airframe structure that experience bending forces during normal flight.
An airplane structure in flight is subjected to many and varying stresses due to the
varying loads that may be imposed. The designer's problem is trying to anticipate the
possible stresses that the structure will have to endure, and to build it sufficiently strong
to withstand these. The problem is complicated by the fact that an airplane structure
must be light as well as strong. The manufacturer states upon certification that the
design meets or exceeds all FAR requirements for the category of aircraft being
produced. However, hard landings, gust loads caused by extreme turbulence,
performing aerobatic maneuvers in a non-aerobatic airplane, etc,. can affect the
airworthiness of one or more major airframe assemblies to the extent that the airplane is
no longer airworthy. This reiterates the necessity of operating the aircraft within the
limitations outlined by the manufacturer. Every flight imposes loads and stresses on the
aircraft. How carefully it is flown, therefore, will have an effect on the service life of its
assemblies.
It is the UFOs ability to withstand or defy the normal loads and stresses of our
conventional aircraft that allows them to fly in such erratic modes as zigzag flight,
instantaneous decelerations, and instantaneous accelerations. The type of flight pattern
makes a UFO stand out from the aerobatic performances of conventional aircraft.
This is only a small part of a subject that could fill a textbook. It is by capturing these
details of UFO flight dynamics for the record that adds weight to the evidence that
unconventional flying objects have been cavorting around the earth for decades.

Magnetic Bubbles and Supercavitation:

If we consider space a medium and that medium is a particulate composition of
space itself, similar to aether, then we can model space propulsion systems based on
that space-aether concept.
The material of space is said to be filled with a froth of virtual particles. Perhaps, in
addition, there are some lepton neutrino space-filling particles that constitute a
hydrodynamic energy that exerts pressure on mass concentrations. If these particles,
real or virtual normally flow through matter, but encounter increasing resistance with
mass density, we could attribute the force of gravity to this virtual particle pressure.
Likewise, such a pressure may be responsible for inertia.
I quote from an article on supercavitation:
Lately there has been a resurgence of interest in a technology that allows naval
weapons and vessels to travel submerged at hundreds of miles per hour. The fastest

21

traditional undersea technologies are limited to a maximum velocity of about 80 miles

per hour. The technology that allows some undersea vessels to travel faster than the
speed of sound in water is called supercavitation. First explored in the 1940s,
supercavitation exploits a loophole that allows underwater travel with minimal drag.
For many years naval experts studied its parent field, cavitation, because of the
problems that it brings about. Only recently did researchers consider supercavitation as
a way to build faster submarines and torpedoes.
To understand supercavitation, first cavitation must be understood. When a fluid moves
rapidly around a body, the pressure in the flow drops. This pressure reduction over the
surface of the body is the same effect that generates lift on airplane wings and gives
sailboats the ability to move on the water's surface with only the wind to propel them.
As the velocity increases and the pressure continues to drop, a point is reached at which
the pressure in the flow equals the vapor pressure of water, whereupon the fluid
undergoes a phase change and becomes a gas: water vapor.
Under certain circumstances, especially at sharp edges, the flow can include attached
cavities of approximately constant pressure filled with water vapor and air trailing
behind. This is called natural cavitation. Normally, cavitation is a condition to be
avoided in fluid flow systems, because it can distort water flow to rob pumps, turbines,
hydrofoils, and propellers of operational efficiency. It can also lead to violent shock
waves (from rapid bubble collapse), which cause pitting and erosion of metal surfaces.
In supercavitation, the small gas bubbles produced by cavitation expand and combine to
form one large, stable, and predictable bubble around the supercavitating object. The
bubble is longer than the object, so only the leading edge of the object actually contacts
liquid water. The rest of the object is surrounded by low-pressure water vapor,
significantly lowering the drag on the supercavitating object.
A supercavity can also form around a specially designed projectile. The key is creating a
zone of low pressure around the entire object by carefully shaping the nose and firing
the projectile at a sufficiently high velocity. At high velocity water flows off the edge of
the nose with a speed and angle that prevent it from wrapping around the surface of the
projectile, producing a low-pressure bubble around the object. With an appropriate nose
shape and a speed over 110 miles per hour, the entire projectile may reside in a vapor
cavity.
Some estimates indicate that a supercavitating projectile, using rocket propulsion, could
travel at speeds in excess of 230 miles per hour underwater.
[Caltech Undergraduate Research Journal, November 30, 2001 ; Scientific American,
May 2001; Deep Angel Cavitator]
Note the analogy of a spatial ocean or sea with an H2O ocean. Creating a supercavity
around a submarine would permit rapid travel through the medium.
Creating a supercavity in space fluid around a spacecraft would also permit rapid travel
through the vacuum of space. The supercavity envisioned might be created as an
electro-magnetic bubble that repels space particles or drastically reduces the density of
the space foam so as to enable the spacecraft to achieve hyperlight velocities, especially
if by this action it has a measurable effect on reducing inertia.
The magnetospheric plasma propulsion envisioned by Robert Winglee may be one step
on the path toward a true magneto-gravitic propulsion system.

22

The method makes use of the ambient energy of the solar wind by coupling
to the solar wind through a large-scale (~ > 10 km) magnetic bubble or minimagnetosphere. The magnetosphere is produced by the injection of plasma on to the
magnetic field of a small (< 1 m) dipole coil tethered to the spacecraft. In this way, it is
possible for a spacecraft to attain unprecedented speeds for minimal energy and mass
requirements. Since the magnetic inflation is produced by electromagnetic processes,
the material and deployment problems associated with the mechanical sails are
eliminated.
Perhaps a magnetic vortex of extreme power drives flying saucers across our skies and
through space. If such a magnetic vortex could be focused to tunnel through the space
medium, then I believe hyperlight speeds are possible.
Lifter technology may demonstrate the utility of an HV-powered craft, but I believe that
eventually we need a dynamic generator that will produce the powerful fields necessary
to propel an interstellar craft. Perhaps some experiments with rotating electric or
magnetic rings could be tried to test levitation effects.
Reverse Engineering:
The alleged recovery of a flying disk near Roswell, New Mexico in July 1947 has
sparked discussions, opinions, and reports that the U.S. Army and Air Force studied the
remnants of the disk, especially the methods and modes of its propulsion with the intent
of reverse engineering the advanced technology found in the alien craft.
Alien astronautics is a subject predicated on the existence of intelligent alien life forms
whose evolution occurred on an extraterrestrial world and who developed means to
travel from their world to other worlds in spacecraft. Reverse engineering is predicated
on the fact that we have acquired alien hardware through flight systems failure of an
alien spacecraft or through communication and negotiation. Reverse engineering of
mechanical parts requires extraction of information about an instance of a particular part
sufficient to replicate the part using appropriate fabrication techniques.
In a letter to researcher William Steinman, Dr. Robert I. Sarbacher who was with the
Washington Institute of Technology, confirms that some of the scientists involved in the
study of recovered flying discs were Dr. Vannever Bush, John von Neumann, and Dr.
Robert Oppenheimer. Steinman also discovered that one of the scientists working on
saucer technology from the early days was Dr. Eric Henry Wang who became Director
of the Department of Special Studies, within the Structures Division, of the old Wright
Air Development Center, near Dayton, Ohio.
New technology such as morphing airplanes and carbon nanotubes may be the result of
alien technology back-engineering studies conducted by the military-industrial complex
in top secret unacknowledged special access programs.
The Bi-Field Theory:

23

From a scientist: The primary propulsion system is electro-magnetic flux

directional positive force generating system. The secondary propulsion system is a
anti-gravity (using fluid plasma) directional negative force generating system.
Remember, these are our terms. The entire craft can be a super conductor or a super
capacitor depending on how the propulsion system is configured. Like I said, the
system is extremely complicated. Unless you understand the entire system, which we
don't, you won't understand what I am saying. The electrical system works on a
vacuum vacated energy principle. This system generates an unlimited amount of
power. The Visitors have determined that hydrogen has many more isotopes than we
thought. H5 is one isotopes they harnessed and use as a catalyst inside the power
device.
What is a negative force generating system?
This was something proposed a long time ago by engineer Leonard G. Cramp in trying
to explain flying saucer propulsion when he alluded to the bi-field theory, the G field
and the R field. He says, Of the G field-propelled craft discussed earlier (the use of an
artificially created gravitational field), we could say that it was gravitationally moved
towards its point source, or, due to a decreased gravitational field strength above it, it is
repelled by the denser space beneath, and either could be equally trueof the R-field
(Repulsion Field) vehicle, we might say that was repulsively moved away from its point
source or, due to the increased gravitational field strength below it, it is attracted to the
less dense space above, and either could be true.. Leonard goes on to propose that
both G-field and R-field, one convertible into the other are in use in UFOs.

Paul Hill, retired and now deceased NASA scientist in his excellent technical analysis
of UFOs in his book Unconventional Flying Objects considers that the UFO generates a
repulsive field. He says, it is shown that the UFO field is not of the static-electric or
static-magnetic type. Rather, it appears to be a quasi-static field of a negative-gravity
type. This is concluded because the data shows that the UFO field repels all mass, not
just electrically charged or magnetic materials.
He also mentions, like Cramp, before him that the field must have some degree of field
focusing, that it goes out predominantly in one direction in order to give control.
These ideas now invoke a new idea in the field of cosmology termed dark energy. Dark
energy is thought to be smoothly distributed throughout the universe. Dark energy has a
strong negative pressure of the same order as its energy density. Dark energy interacts
only through gravity. Dark energy produces a repulsive force and drives the expansion

24

of the universe.
The point to be made here is that the extraterrestrial starship engineers have harnessed
both gravitation and repulsion as a means of traveling through interplanetary and
interstellar space. Perhaps they have even been able to artificially create a wormhole
tunnel to distant parts of the galaxy through using their control of gravitation and dark
energy.
Townsend Browns Electrogravitic Capacitors:
Strange as it seems it was during the 1950s that various aircraft companies started
research projects on the control of gravity and electro-gravitational propulsion. It is
possible that these projects constituted some of the first reverse engineering projects on
extraterrestrial propulsion systems.

American physicist and inventor, T. Townsend Brown discovered an effect of highly

charged disk-shaped capacitors. When the capacitors were charged in excess of 50 KV,
they would have a tendency to accelerate in the direction of the positive pole.
Suspending a number of these disk capacitors from a freely rotating carousel would
cause, when charged, the entire assembly to rotate. These charged capacitors could also
levitate.
According to the Air Force Manual from Wright-Patterson AFB on Electrogravitics we
have this description on the Thomas Townsend Brown discovery.
Electrogravitics might be described as a synthesis of electrostatic energy used for
propulsion - either vertical propulsion or horizontal or both - and gravitics, or dynamic
counterbary, in which energy is also used to set up a local gravitational force
independent of the earths.
Electrostatic energy for propulsion has been predicted as a possible means of propulsion
in space when the thrust from a neutron motor or ion motor would be sufficient in a
dragless environment to produce astronomical velocities. But the ion motor is not
strictly a part of the science of electrogravitics, since barycentric control in an
electrogravitics system is envisaged for a vehicle operating within the earths
environment and it is not seen initially for space application. Probably large scale space

25

operations would have to await the full development of electrogravitics to enable large
pieces of equipment to be moved out of the region of the earths strongest gravity
effects. So, though electrostatic motors were thought of in 1925, electrogravitics had its
birth after the War, when Townsend Brown sought to improve on the various proposals
that then existed for electrostatic motors sufficiently to produce some visible
manifestation of sustained motion. Whereas earlier electrostatic tests were essentially
pure research, Browns rigs were aimed from the outset at producing a flying article. As
a private venture he produced evidence of motion using condensers in a couple of
saucers suspended by arms rotating round a central tower with input running down the
arms. The massive-k situation was summarized subsequently in a report, Project
Winterhaven, in 1952. Using the data some conclusions were arrived at that might be
expected from ten or more years of intensive development - similar to that, for instance,
applied to the turbine engine. Using a number of assumptions as to the nature of gravity,
the report postulated a saucer as the basis of a possible interceptor with Mach 3
capability. Creation of a local gravitational system would confer upon the fighter the
sharp-edged changes of direction typical of motion in space.
The essence of electrogravitics thrust is the use of a very strong positive charge on one
side of the vehicle and a negative on the other. The core of the motor is a condenser and
the ability of the condenser to hold its charge (the k-number) is the yardstick of
performance. With air as 1, current dielectrical materials can yield 6 and use of barium
aluminate can raise this considerably, barium titanium oxide (a baked ceramic) can offer
6,000 and there is promise of 30,000, which would be sufficient for supersonic speed.
The original Brown rig produced 30 fps on a voltage of around 50,000 and a small
amount of current in the milliamp range. There was no detailed explanation of gravity in
Project Winterhaven, but it was assumed that particle dualism in the subatomic
structure of gravity would coincide in its effect with the issuing stream of electrons
from the electrostatic energy source to produce counterbary. The Brown work probably
remains a realistic approach to the practical realization of electrostatic propulsion and
sustentation. Whatever may be discovered by the Gravity Research Foundation of New
Boston a complete understanding and synthetic reproduction of gravity is not essential
for limited success. The electrogravitics saucer can perform the function of a classic
lifting surface - it produces a pushing effect on the under surface and a suction effect on
the upper, but, unlike the airfoil, it does not require a flow of air to produce the effect.

26

Contactees Descriptions:
Many UFO contactees, those who have claimed to have been taken physically aboard a
flying saucer, describe high-voltage electrostatic capacitors, a magnetic rotor, and a
central column sometimes referred to as the magnetic pole of the ship. They also report
that when the craft is in motion, there is no sensation of acceleration and yet, the
apparent gravity in the cabin seems normal.
The description of the saucer seems as if the alien visitors had modeled their craft on the
constituents of an atom with a central reversible magnetic pole, a positive core or
nucleus in the craft, and capacitive electrons which aid in directional control. All report
very high voltages are generated to produce a field around the craft allowing it to nullify
gravitational and inertial forces.
Here is a brief description given by contactee George Adamski and reiterated by many
other contactees since then:
Within the craft there was not a single dark corner. I could not make out where the
light was coming from. It seemed to permeate every cavity and corner with a soft
pleasing glow. There is no way of describing that light exactly. It was not white, nor
was it blue, nor was it exactly any other color that I could name. Instead, it seemed to

27

consist of a mellow blend of all colors, though at times I fancied one or another seemed
to predominate.
I was so engrossed in trying to solve this mystery, and at the same time to see and
absorb every detail of this amazing little craft that I was quite unaware we had taken off,
although I did suddenly register a slight feeling of movement. But there was no
sensation of enormous acceleration, nor of changes in pressure and altitude as would be
the case in one of our planes going at half the speed. Nor had we experienced any jerk
as we broke contact with the ground. I had an impression of tremendous solidity and
smoothness, with little more realization of movement than of the unnoticeable journey
of the Earth itself as it revolves around the Sun at eighteen and one-half miles per
second. Others who have been privileged to ride in these Saucers also have been struck
by the same sensation of movementor rather, the almost total lack of it. But the fact
is, with so many wonders crowding my consciousness, it was only later, after I was back
on Earth reviewing the nights experiences in my own mind, that I could begin to sort
them out.
The Searl Disc:
New experiments attempting to replicate the Searl Disc and Searl Effect Generator
(SEG) may yet vindicate its inventor who has stuck by his story of development over
the years. I believe the SEG models the atom in that it uses self-impelled rollers that
behave like electrons in orbit around the central plates. The plates develop a positive
charge while the rollers develop a negative charge. The outer runner is moving through
an electromagnetic field which tends to suppress dielectric breakdown and allows
megavoltages to develop surrounding the disc with a vacuum layer that, as the runners
achieve their velocity, produces a cooling effect around the disc, and the whole becomes
a superconductor that generates a powerful electric field that decouples the disc from
the earths gravity.
The SEG consists of a basic drive unit called the Gyro-Cell (GC) and, depending on the
application, is either fitted with coils for generation of electricity or with a shaft for
transfer of mechanical power. The GC can also be used as a high voltage source.
Another and important quality of the GC 1s its ability to levitate.
The GC can be considered as an electric motor entirely consisting of permanent
magnets in the shape of cylindrical bars and annular rings.
Figure 1 shows the basic GC in its simplest form, consisting of one stationary annular
ring-shaped magnet, called the plate, and a number of moving cylinder-shaped rods
called runners.
Figure 1 ~

28

During operation each runner is spinning about its axis and is simultaneously orbiting
the plate in such a manner that a fixed point p on the curved runner surface traces out a
whole number of cycloids during one revolution round the plate, as shown by the dotted
lines in Figure 2.
Figure 2 ~

Measurements have revealed that an electric potential difference is produced in the

radial direction between plate and runners; the plate being positively charged and the
runners negatively charged, as shown in Figure 1.
In principle, no mechanical constraints are needed to keep the GC together since the
runners are electromagnetically coupled to the plate. However, used as a torque
producing device, shaft and casing must be fitted to transfer the power produced.
Furthermore, in applications where the generator is mounted inside a framework, the
runners should be made shorter than the height of the plate to prevent the runners from
catching the frame or other parts.
When in operation, gaps are created by electromagnetic interaction and centrifugal
forces preventing mechanical and galvanic contact between plate and runners and
thereby reducing the friction to negligible values.
The experiments showed that the power output increases as the number of runners
increase and to achieve smooth and even operation the ratio between external plate
diameter Dp and runner diameter Dr should be a positive integer greater than or equal to
12. Thus:

29

(1)

P/Dr = N > 12 (N = 12, 13, 14, &c)

The experiments also indicated that the gaps O between adjacent runners should be one
runner diameter D as shown in Figure 1.
More complex Gyro-Cells can be formed by adding further plates and runners to the
basic unit. Figure 3 illustrates a 3-plate GC consisting of three sections, A, B and C.
Each section consists of one plate with corresponding runners.
Searl's original idea was that free electrons in spinning metal bodies may have a
tendency to move in the radial direction due to inertial forces. If this hypothesis was
correct then an electric potential difference should develop between the center and
periphery of a rotating shaft and between the inner edge and the rim of a slip ring. He
also held the view that the electromotive force induced in spinning bodies due to the
earth's magnetic field could be used for generating electric energy. Accordingly, Searl's
first series of experiments consisted of careful measurements on fast rotating steel shafts
and slip rings made of brass and indeed he was able to show the existence of a minute
electric voltage in the radial direction. If this voltage was due to the inertial properties
of the electrons or induced by the magnetic field of the earth was never established.
However, it soon became evident that this simple generator would only be practically
useful if means could be found to increase the power output.
In Conclusion:
An aether-vortex model of the atom may be useful in devising means of producing a
negative gravitational or repulsive force. The aether itself may be the source of dark
energy. The vortex core may be a gateway into other dimensions and time travel. It is
one thing to replicate or reverse-engineer an Alien machine, but there is no doubt that
there are variations on gravity control and two main variations are supercapacitance and
superconduction. I favor the idea of generating high-potential fields by rotating charges
as in the spin of elementary particles and using these macro electrostatic fields for the
control of gravitation and inertia.

30

31

32

33

34

35

36

37

38

39

40

41

42

43

rexresearch.com
Home ~ Catalog ~ Links

Robert L. Cook: Inertial Propulsion Engine

Marjorie Riley: Vallejo Independent Press (21 Feb 1987); "Meet Robert Cook, Resident Inventor"
Robert. Cook: "The Conversion of Centrifugal Force Into Linear Force and Motion"
David Doll, et al.: United Air Lines Test Center & Process Engineering Report D-71-77 (11-11-1971)
John Davidson: Concord Transcript (CA): Thursday 2 December 1971; "Concord Man Invents New
Propulsion Plan"
June Land: Stockton Record 79(#308); Tues., 12 Feb. 1974; Newton Challenged"
Sue Shoemaker: The Green Sheet 59 (#29); Friday, 8 Feb. 1974; "Machine Challenges Newtons Law of
Motion"
Robert Cook: US Patent # 3,683,707; "Propulsion System"
R. Cook: US Patent # 4,238,968; "Device for Conversion of Centrifugal Force to Linear Force and
Motion"
Robert Cook's Website: http://www.rexresearch.com/cookip/www.forceborne.com

The Cook Inertial Propulsion Engine (December 1999) ~

44

Vallejo Independent Press (Friday, February 21, 1987)

"Meet Robert Cook: Resident Inventor"

by Marjorie Riley
Robert Cook, 47, Vallejos "resident inventor", started "tooling around with machinery" when
he was a very small boy.
Its easy to see why. His father, a civil and mining engineer, moved the family "all over the
place" as he went from job to job in Texas, Nevada, and California, and in the process taught
his son just about everything he knew about mathematics and machinery.
Not long ago this informally educated engineer was granted a patent by the US Patent Office
for his "Device for Converting Centrifugal Force to Linear Force and Motion". More recently,
he was a guest speaker at the annual dinner meeting of the National Association of Naval
Technical Supervisors, Mare Island Chapter. Following the formal lecture, Cook talked "until
midnight" with a dozen or so nuclear physicists and scientists who were among the audience
about his invention and the book, "The Death of Rocketry" which he recently co-authored
with physicist Joel Dickinson.
Pretty impressive when you learn that after graduating from Mt. Diablo High School, young
Robert enrolled in engineering school, but quit not long afterwards.

45

"I was bored", he said, smiling at the memory. "They werent teaching me anything I hadnt
already learned from my dad. It seemed like a waste of time."
Eager to start working with machinery, young Cook became an apprentice printing pressman
instead, working for the old Walnut Creek Kernel. Later he worked as first pressman on the
big 150-ton Goss Urbanite offset press in Gazette Press, a Berkeley commercial printing
press.
Cook is credited with eight separate inventions relating to his printing press days. "It was a
good introduction to spin dynamics", he said, "a concept that has fascinated me ever since."
Concerning Cooks recently published book, "The Death of Rocketry", one Association
member said, "One chapter begins with an explanation of the principle behind Cooks Inertial
Propulsion engine and some thoughts on how our lives will be changed when the device is
perfected and in production. Another chapter deals with the controversy that Cooks device
has stirred --- it creates an internal force for propulsion and therefore refutes Sir Isaac
Newtons laws of motion, particularly the third one which holds that there is an equal and
opposite reaction. Cook has charged Newtons laws are incorrect, thus challenging the entire
foundation of physics and mechanics, of his device does work."
A news release from The Communication Process in San Francisco states: "The...
[invention]... apparently contradicts Newtons third law of motion, and he (Cook) has met
with severe criticism and disbelief from scientific and academic establishments. Nevertheless
he (Cook) has successfully built numerous working models and is now in the process of
building a flying vehicle powered by the CIP unit."
Concerning the invention, Cook himself says: "The rocket was abandoned as a serious means
of propulsion shortly after its invention by the Chinese in 1214 AD. Although in recent years
the rocket has been revived by the industrialized nations of the world, the extremely low
efficiencies involved -- 2% or less -- make it a less-than-satisfactory method of travel,
especially for outer space applications. Clearly, of mankind wishes to make significant
advance in the exploration of space, an alternative and more efficient means of propulsion
must be developed.
"The Cook Inertial Propulsion (CIP) engine provides the new technology needed for a major
step forward in space exploration. The CIP engine is not a new energy source, but a tested and
proven method of converting Coriolis and centrifugal forces into linear thrust. The result is a
reactionless propulsive system powered by conventional energy sources which is expected to
yield efficiencies in the range of 80-85% when fully perfected."

"The Conversion of Centrifugal Force Into Linear Force and Motion"

by Robert Cook
Years ago, Albert Einstein remarked:
"When first studying mechanics, one has the impression that everything in this branch of
science is simple, fundamental and settled for all time. One would hardly suspect the
existence of an important clue which no one noticed for 300 years. The neglected clue is
connected with one of the fundamental concepts of mechanics --- that of Mass."

46

And now, with the discovery of the CIP engine mechanical principle, which has been
followed by the successful demonstration of many CIP engine prototypes, another neglected
clue in the field of mechanics has been found --- that of an internal, reactionless force which
can be produced by converting centrifugal force into a linear thrust.
Science in general has considered centrifugal force a "pseudo force" incapable of affecting
motion to any great degree. "Bounded motion" is all centrifugal force was considered capable
of producing. I will show that a constant linear force can be produced by centrifugal force
when properly controlled.
I will limit my comments on Newtonian Law to his 3rd law of motion regarding action and
reaction because my work deals with reactionless force systems deemed unworkable by this
3rd law.
Background of the Experiments ~
In my early experiments starting February 1968, I had originally started to search for a new
energy source based on a combination of forces, i.e., gravity, magnetism, and centrifugal
force. An error I made in design resulted in the discovery of a new method of propulsion and
ended (temporarily) my search for a new energy source. The early system utilized a Coriolis
Effect to create the propulsive effect, but it was highly inefficient (about 1%).
A report, "D-71-77" dated 11-11-71 prepared by the engineering staff of United Airlines Test
Center in San Francisco, concluded that although highly inefficient, the system nonetheless
worked in spite of Newtons laws. A series of accelerometer tests completed in late December
1972 by this same group also proved the system was producing an internal force, but also
showed poor efficiency.
After numerous attempts to improve the efficiency of that system which was granted US
Patent # 3,683,707, I decided in late 1974 to look for another more efficient method to create
unidirectional force.
The series of tests concluded in a 6-month span in 1974 had given me three clues on how to
do this, and they were:
1. The system would require counter-rotating rotors.
2. The system would require a series of flexible drive shafts for the rotors.
3. A positive control for the inertia of the propellant mass would be needed.
The fourth and final clue would be sound in November of that year. This last clue dealt with
the splitting and transferal of the propellant mass.
How the CIP Works ~
In order to understand the reasons for the formerly mentioned series of mechanical actions, we
must analyze the effects of unbalanced spinning rotors on wheels in effecting motion.
If we build an unbalanced rotor resembling a one-bladed aircraft propeller (Fig. 1), and spin it
in a horizontal plane, it will tend to cause a gyrating force or a force in all directions in that
horizontal plane.
Fig. 1: Unbalanced Rotor ~ ***

47

In order to control gyration, we need counter-rotation and synchronization, so if we take two

counter-rotating unbalanced rotors and spin them together (Fig. 2), the gyration will become
an oscillation or it could be called an alternating force similar to AC current.
Fig. 2: Two Unbalanced Rotors Produce Alternating Force ~ ***

If the unbalanced centrifugal force is plotted on a graph, it will show a regular sine wave
exactly as a single phase alternating current.
If we are to propel with this force, we must rectify it by causing a multiple spin.
The multiple spin is needed in order to effect the "energy state" of the propellant mass. This
amounts to an orbit and a spin for the propellant mass.
The reason for this is best shown by analyzing a 2-bladed helicopter rotor.
If a helicopter is not moving through the air, but is sitting on the ground with the rotor
spinning at a high speed, and the blade tips are moving at say 300 mph, this velocity will
remain the same relative to the environment all around the circle of rotation. If we, some way,
could cause the rotor tips to fly off at the 9 oclock and 3 oclock positions simultaneously,
then the tips would leave in a tangent or straight line to the front and back of the helicopter
and their speed would be 300 mph in two different or opposite directions. Their momentum or
energy state would be identical --- the same amount of energy or resisting force would be
required to stop them individually. Their energy state is the same.
If the helicopter is then flown forward at say 100 mph, something very interesting happens to
the energy state of these rotor tips when they reach the 9 and 3 oclock positions. If we view

48

the rotor from the top and see it rotating clockwise, the following will become obvious when
the helicopter is moving at 100 mph.
1. The rotor (A) at the 9 oclock position will be moving through the air at 400 mph while
rotor B at the 3 oclock position will move at 200 ph through the air (Pilots must consider the
advance ratio of the copter blades or it goes out of control.).
2. If we now release the rotor tips in these same positions (3 and 9 oclock), tip A will leave
(in a tangent) at 400 mph, and tip B will leave at 200 mph. The inertial state can be
determined by the momentum equation, Momentum = MV.
Its obvious that tip A with twice the velocity will have 2 times more energy and be in a
higher energy state than tip B.
The point I am trying to make very clear is that when the center of rotation of 2 spinning
masses arranged in this fashion is moved in a straight line (or in a circle like the upper arm of
the CIP unit does), the energy state of the two masses will be affected; one mass will increase
its energy state, while the other one decreases.
The rotor on the demonstration model is set like a helicopter rotor that spins in a vertical plane
instead of horizontal and also orbits. This is what allows one half of the propellant mass to be
transferred while in a low energy state.
The Oscillator & Nucleus ~
Once the small rotor sheds one half of its mass, the rotor goes temporarily out of balance and
in order to prevent negative force impulses from causing negative effects on the overall
system, the rotor is allowed to oscillate and its oscillations are controlled by a built-in Nuclear
Mass which actually provides the centripetal force to make the mass, still attached to the small
rotor, spin in the ideal fashion. A motion limiting slot as well as a flexible drive shaft
complete the unit. Although one rotor unit works well enough to demonstrate the new
principle, the ideal configuration is a 12 rotor combination with units based at 120 degree
intervals. This will produce a constant force and would have the potential for vertical lift.
A 12 rotor system should be ready for testing by December of 1981.
Endorsements ~
All scientists and engineers (except for2) have endorsed the CIP principle after seeing the
model.
Prof. Ching Fong (former chairman of the Physics Dept, UC Davis, and Prof. Of Solid State
Physics) has analyzed the system and estimates the energy efficiency potential at 53% and a
propulsion efficiency of 98%.
Prof. Durward Jackson of California State University at Los Angeles declares the system "One
of the 10 greatest inventions in history".
Countless numbers of engineers have declared it the greatest invention in history!

United Air Lines Test Center & Process Engineering Report

49

By David Doll, et al.

Introduction ~
On 9-10-71 Robert Cook brought to UAL a device designed to convert centrifugal force into a
linear thrust. In spite of being declared in violation of the laws of motion by the US Patent
Office, Cooks crudely-built rig moved spasmodically across the floor.
This report provides a dynamic analysis of Cooks mechanism. The cycle demonstrated by
Cooke, as well as two other cycles which offer performance improvements, are examined.
Cooks Propulsion Cycle ~
Cook set up his working model so that the propellant mass followed the path shown in Figure
3. From point 1 to point 2 the propellant mass is pinned against the end of the tract by
centrifugal force. The thrust seen in tis segment is the component of centrifugal force in the
direction of the cart motion. This thrust is:
(1) ***

where mp is the propellant mass,

R is one half the sliding distance of the track,
W is the angular velocity of the rotor, and
T is time.
Due to Cooks positioning of the spring, the propellant mass spends more time behind the
center of rotation of the track than forward of the center. Thus, the net thrust in segment 1-2 is
negative.
When the propellant mass reached point 2, the spring force overcomes the centrifugal force,
and the mass accelerates down the tract to point 3. During this portion of the cycle the system
acts as a mechanical analogue to a rocket. The propellant mass is accelerated in the aft
direction b the spring force and the resultant reaction produces a forward thrust upon the cart.
In addition to this reaction force there is Coriolis force which is the inertial effect occurring
when a mass is constrained to move in a straight line across a rotating body. The total thrust in
segment 1-2 is:
(2) ***

Where K is the spring constant, and

(3)***

50

mo is the mass of the cart.

At point 3 the propellant mass strikes the end of the cart producing a negative impulsive force.
where delta t is the time required to stop the propellant mass, and:
Fo = KR - mpRw2
During this segment of the cycle the propellant is stopped at the expense of the forward
momentum of the cart.
The resultant thrust on the cart for the entire cycle is shown in Figure 3. [Not Available]
A Modification of Cooks Cycle ~
A significant improvement in performance can be achieved by using viscous damping to arrest
the propellant mass [i.e.: "Sorbothane"]. Not only can the large negative impulse be avoided,
but by delaying the travel of the mass to the end of the track, the negative centrifugal force
component can be reduced.
Cooks cycle could also be improved by the use of a constant force rather than the variable
force to accelerate the propellant mass. This would increase the thrust during the ejection
stroke by allowing the use of greater force and improving the timing of the stroke.

Concord Transcript (CA): Thursday 2 December 1971

"Concord Man Invents New Propulsion Plan"

by John Davidson
Concord resident Bob Cook, 37, has invented a new propulsion system which he says will cut
air pollution and power just about anything that moves.
His only problem is that, thanks to Newtons third law, hes having a hard time finding
believers.
"For every action, there is an opposite and equal reaction", said Sir Isaac Newton almost 300
years ago.
According to Cook, who is a printing pressman by trade, these few and "somewhat
ambiguous" words are greatly responsible for the delay in developing his new system.
Cook says his system is a completely new way of moving cars, airplanes, etc., by converting
centrifugal force into a line of "linear force".

51

At this state, his principle is illustrated in a small working model -- built with hand tools -that resembles some sort of surrealistic bicycle.
It consists of an aluminum frame, a motor, and four small rotors or "carriers".
The rotors are hollow and they have weights inside, which can slide back and forth. The motor
operates a cam which pulls in springs attached to the rotors.
When the invention is started, it powers the frame forward in a series of jerks because of three
actions outlined by Cook:
The spinning of a rotor which sends the weight to one end, which multiplies the force at that
end;
As the weighted end of the rotor nears the high point of its forward spin the attached string
pulls it back. This generates more resistance at the high point, which results in more positive
force there.
The negative centrifugal force created by the weighted end of the rotor in its backward spin is
nullified by adding more rotors, which are timed so there is a minimum negative force.
Sounds simple? Not really, says Cook, but it could be put into use now if it werent for
Newton.
"Some engineers have interpreted Newtons law to say that such a mechanism will not work
(because the backward spin of the rotors presumably would offset the forward spin)", Cook
says. "Others say not so."
"Several small models have already been built to test the principle involved and they work",
the inventor adds.
"One model was demonstrated at the University of Arizona but it wasnt endorsed because of
Newtons law! The model worked but thats besides the point.
Another model was recently demonstrated at the engineering department of United Air Lines
in San Francisco. There an engineer was given the job of studying the idea. His conclusion:
"The system would work in outer space and might be a good substitute for helicopter rotors",
Cook says. "This engineer felt that this system did not violate Newtons law."
Cook also demonstrated a model at NASAs Ames Research Center at Mt. View, but says
engineers there refused to believe that the model was really propelling itself with centrifugal
force since they felt Newtons law was against it.
"Like all new and really outstanding systems, this idea is being met with skepticism and this
could delay its development and eventual use for several years", Cook notes.
Cook, a bachelor who has lived in Concord on and off for almost 20 years, says he has taken
time off from his printing trade to work on his system and to try to promote it.
"Off and on for about the last two years Ive been conducting experiments in Texas (at a
relatives home)", Cook says. He moved to Concord the latest time about six months ago and
has been continuing work at the home of friends.

52

The inventor says he struck upon the idea for his propulsion system accidentally.
"I was more or less working on a motor --- a perpetual motion experiment, just out of
curiosity even though thats considered nutty. I made a mistake which put the motor out of
balance. Then I realized it was foing to propel itself. It was at that time I became interested in
this principle (centrifugal force)."
After that accidental discovery, Cook says he came to Oakland to see a patent attorney, and a
patent search was conducted to see if someone had a similar device.
He says he filed for a patent in April 1969, but it was refused on the grounds it was contrary to
the laws of mechanics (Newtons third law).
After that, Cook refilled according to a change he had made in the design (he found he had
made a slight mistake in the original). That was in October of last year, and that application is
still pending.
Right now he says he is in the process of contacting business and getting media coverage.
"Ild like to see inventor William Lear, whos working with a steam turbine of cars", the local
inventor says. "Im looking of someone to help me develop my system."
The most important use of his device would be in cars, Cook says, since it could be helpful in
cutting smog.
"It can be used on just about anything that moves", he says, noting that it could be powered
even by solar energy in space. "All you need is something to cause the rotors to spin."
In an actual full-sized motor, he adds, there would have to be an 18-rotor mechanism (the
rotors would only have to be 8 inches long each).
He centrifugal force propulsion system is not Cooks invention -- he says its his eighth.
"Practically all of the rest dealt with the printing trade", he says. "Theyve all worked. But
financially speaking, the inventions were too late since those types of presses were just about
obsolete."
Cook, who has a high school education, says he is "more or less self taught. Im just curious -machinery fascinates me; it just comes second nature to me."
The inventor claims his centrifugal force system really does not oppose Newtons law. "When
the frame moves, thats the reaction (in Newtons principle). This system just diverts the
reaction."
Well, they doubted Copernicus and Freud too...

Stockton Record 79(#308); Tues., 12 Feb. 1974

"Newton Challenged"
by June Land
Isaac Newtons third law of motion may well have been contradicted Monday afternoon in

53

Stockton.
A contraption resembling a childs large-scale erector set model, described by its inventor as
an internal propulsion device, passed its final test -- it moved forward on almost frictionless
ice.
Newtons law says that for every action there has to be an equal and opposite reaction, or to
put it another way -- for a body to move it must be acted on by an outside source.
"Newton made a mistake, thats all", said the inventor, Bob Cook, 39, of Pittsburg, who
maintains the device will revolutionize transportation.
The device is made of counter-rotating cams and gears resting on thin blades that are powered
by an electric motor, but battery or even solar power could be used, says Cook.
He explained the contraption is propelled by the so-called "phantom" Coriolis force trapped
inside the rotors which results in the motion despite the absence of friction.
Webster identifies the Coriolis force as corresponding to the Coriolis acceleration of a body
equal to the product of the mass by the Coriolis acceleration and responding as a result of the
earths rotation for the deflection of projectiles and the motion of the winds to the right in the
northern hemisphere and to the left I the southern hemisphere.
Skeptics claimed the device would "just sit there and rock back and forth" if all friction were
eliminated, said Cook.
It moved forward in short spurts Monday afternoon at Oak Park Ice Rink, however. Cook
maintains the experimental model can be improved to get a more constant force by more and a
better combination of rotors.
"I have definitely proven the principle is sound by doing all the tests that are required. Now I
have to determine the efficiency", he explained.
Some of the tests included movement on an air cushion suspended from ropes and in a raft
floating in a swimming pool.
People say it cant work because it defies the laws of nature", said the soft-spoken and rather
shy inventor who admitted he has no formal education.
He was a printer for about 18 years in the East Bay area and says he stumbled on the idea for
the contraption when he was experimenting with a new energy source.
"I made a mistake and came up with this."
Cook has been working on the test model for about 6n years and has invested some $50,000,
according to an assistant, Joel Dickenson, 24, of Pittsburg.
Cook claims the device can be used to propel automobiles and "could even move in space" if
solar power were used.
He patented the device in 1972 and the next step is to either raise capital to produce a working
model or to sell the idea to a manufacturer, said Dickenson.

54

The Green Sheet 59 (#29); Friday, 8 Feb. 1974

"Machine Challenges Newtons Law of Motion"

by Sue Shoemaker
An apparently simple, 85-pound device which Bob Cook of Pittsburg has invented may not
revolutionize transportation and aerospace industries overnight -- but then again maybe it will.
Cook has spent the last six years and about $50,000 developing what he claims is a
revolutionary new method of propulsion, which defies scientific laws of nature.
Despite doubts ranging from skepticism to outright disbelief on the part of scientists and
engineers at Ames Research Center and United Air Lines, Cook says his device in a more
sophisticated form would be capable of solving the energy crisis and propelling any vehicle,
from bicycles to space craft.
Basically, Cooks device consists of four rotors mounted in two levels on a frame. Atop each
rotor is a weight which slides back and forth in a short track.
As the rotor turns forward, the weight, attached by a spring to the frame of the machine, slides
forward, jerking the machine forward.
As the rotor continues its revolution the weight slides back, but because the speed of the rotor
has been reduced the weight moves back with less force than it moves forward, so although
the machine jerks backward, the backward jerk is weaker than the forward jerk and the net
effect seems to be a slight forward movement.
The forward thrust is intermittent, occurring only when the weight slides forward once per
revolution, but Cook and his assistant, Joel Dickinson, are working to improve it by making
the forward thrust continuous.
Cook acknowledges the device he is now testing is a crude model, "sort of like the Wright
brothers first plane", he says with a chuckle. Although rotor ovelment is now very slow, he
says it and the speed of the machine could be increased 1,000 times.
"With the help of advanced hydraulics and ball bearings, there would be hundreds of uses for
it", he says.
Cook was testing the device at Buchanan Air Field in Concord Wednesday and planned to
take it back to Ames later in the week. Although it is currently powered by electricity, he says
one of the devices most revolutionary features is that it can run on any type of power, from
steam to solar energy.
In addition, he claims the machine needs relatively little power to reach great speeds, an
important factor in times of fuel shortage.
"This form of inertial propulsion could eventually be the most widely used form of
propulsion. It could outrun anything we have now", he predicts.
And even of more scientific significance, Cook and Dickinson, who admitted he was an "A-1
skeptic" until he saw the machine, are sure the invention disproves Newtons Third Law of

55

Motion, that every action has an equal and opposite reaction.

They are confident that once it is accepted by the scientific establishment the device will force
a reevaluation of the basis of physics and revolutionize the entire field.
But acceptance does not seem forthcoming, although scientists at both United Airlines and
Ames have been sufficiently interested in the device to test and analyze it.
Their conclusion has been that, on a theoretical basis the device should not work; that
according to known scientific principles it cannot contradict Newtons Law and do what Cook
believes it does.
But to David Doll, an aeronautical engineer at United, this does not entirely rule out the
possibility Cook has really discovered something.
"He may have something in this invention which is not covered by simple Newtons Law
analysis", Doll says. He added according to Newtonian analysis the helicopter should never
have worked.
"Maybe hes got another helicopter", he says.
According to Doll, the United scientists concluded the device would not be practical for use
by the airlines. In addition to certain technical problems which would be encountered in
adapting the device on a large enough scale to lift and propel planes, he says the method is
substantially less efficient than current means of propulsion.
"But its an interesting device", Dell says. I cant really see any promise for it in the industry
but its fun to watch. Im kind of rooting for him."
An Ames scientist who is familiar with Cooks work is more discouraging. While the device
may have limited success on earth, it would never work in deep space, he claims.
"Hes trying to violate the laws of nature and not having much success", he said. "But it might
be nice as a Christmas toy for the kids."
Dr. John Trenholm, a physicist at the University of California Lawrence Laboratory at
Livermore, is unwilling to be quite so strong in his skepticism.
"I have my doubts that it does what he thinks it does, but the important thing is to see if it
performs and then try to explain why", Trenholm says.
And even if Cook has developed a new form of propulsion, Trenholm says, it is probably so
weak that it will never prove useful in transportation.
But even limited success would be very valuable to science, he adds. "The value would not be
in practical applications but in pointing out to scientists that in some small way the principles
on which they base their work is wrong.
The discovery of just such an "error" years ago led to the development of the hydrogen bomb,
he said.
"The scientific community is not always right", Trenholm pointed out. "Theres no

56

fundamental reason why someone in their backyard in Pittsburg cant come up with something
really significant."
A former printing pressman, Cook has worked full time on his invention for the past six years.
Although he has had no advanced training in engineering or physics he says he comes from a
"long line of engineers and physicists".

US Patent # 3,683,707
"Propulsion System"
Robert Cook
[Figures only... Link to the complete patent -- PDF format -- at the European Patent
Office:
http://l2.espacenet.com/espacenet/bnsviewer?CY=ep&LG=en&DB=EPD&PN=US36837
07&ID=US+++3683707A1+I+

57

US Patent # 4,238,968
Robert Cook
December 16, 1980
"Device for Conversion of Centrifugal Force to Linear Force and Motion"
Abstract ~
A device to employ centrifugal force for use as linear motion utilizing a pair of counter
rotating arms about a common axle. One arm contains a mass splitable and transferable to the
other arm and back again at one hundred and eighty degree intervals. The device may include
a surface travel system or two of such devices may be employed in tandem for any mode of
travel.
Inventors: Cook; Robert L. (605 Wilson Ave., Vallejo, CA 94590)
Appl. No.: 945245 Filed: September 25, 1978

58

Current U.S. Class: 74/84R; 74/84S

Intern'l Class: F16H 033/20
Field of Search: 74/84 R,84 S
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents:
# 1,953,964 ~ Apr., 1934 ~ Laskowitz 74/84.
# 2,009,780 ~ Jul., 1935 ~ Laskowitz 74/84.
# 2,306,723 ~ Dec., 1942 ~ Floraday 268/124.
# 2,350,248 ~ May., 1944 ~ Nowlin 74/61.
# 3,555,915 ~ Jan., 1971 ~ Young, Jr. 74/84.
# 3,683,707 ~ Aug., 1972 ~ Cook 74/84.
# 3,968,700 ~ Jul., 1976 ~ Cuff 74/84.
Primary Examiner: Herrmann; Allan D.

Attorney, Agent or Firm: Bielen and Peterson

Claims: [Claims not included here ]

Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to a device for the conversion of centrifugal force to linear force
and, therefore, linear motion. The device may be used to propel any common vehicle such as
automobiles, rail cars, and marine, aviation and space carriers, and the like.
As enunciated by Sir Issac Newton, an object directed along a curved path will exert a force
against the retraining or directing item. In other words, a force is produced by an object that
constantly changes direction, since a change in speed or direction constitutes acceleration. As
is well known, the centrifugal force is directly proportional to the mass of the object, or the
radius of the circle through which the object moves, or the square of the angular velocity of
the spinning object. Therefore, doubling the number of revolutions per minute of the object,
will increase the centrifugal force by a factor of four (4).
Centrifugal force often expressed in the amount "times" the normal pull of gravity or "g's",
may produce a surprisingly large force. For example, an object following a circular path
having a radius of ten centimeters, at a rate of six hundred revolutions per minute, generates a
centrifugal force which is 41 times gravity.
As can be surmised, a device that enables the transformation of the centrifugal force produced
by a rotating body into a linear force, with only a modest efficiency, may be applied to any
mode of vehicle travel.
In the past, various attempts have been put forth to reap the advantages of the powerful and
easily generated centrifugal force by effecting such a transformation. For example, these
apparatuses have rotated mass members and shifted the center of gravity relative to the axis of
rotation. The result has been the development of a centrifugal force greater where the mass
has shifted, than the remainder of the rotational cycle. In essence, the length of the radius of
the arm has been changed. As is well known, the conservation of angular momentum would
tend to correspondingly decrease the speed of the mass shifted.
As an example of a successful machine of this type, reference is made to U.S. Pat. No.
3,683,707, issued on Aug. 15, 1972, to applicant. However, machines of this type, although
workable, are not efficient enough to produce the desired linear force to warrant general use.

59

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention provides a device for converting the force of a spinning or rotating mass
into a linear component of force usable to propel a vehicle in a linear path.
In accordance with the present invention, a first rotating arm is provided, moving about an
axis of rotation. A pair of balanced masses rotates at the terminus of the arm in a plane
perpendicular to the plane of the first arm. A second arm counter-rotates about the same axis
with respect to the first rotating arm and moves within a plane parallel to the plane of rotation
of the first arm. A mechanism cooperative between the first and second arms permits the
transfer of one of the balanced weights from the first arm to the second arm. At a selected
point in the rotational path of both arms, one of the masses transfers causing cancellation of
the centrifugal force produced by the first rotating arm. The mass again transfers from the
second arm to the first arm after one hundred eighty degrees of circular travel of both arms. At
this point, there is a centrifugal force bias in favor of the arm having the masses which
continues for another one hundred eighty degrees of arcuate travel, when compared to the
prior semicircle traveled. In other words, the net result of the arm having the pair of masses is
an imbalanced centrifugal force during half of the circular path of both arms.
The resultant imbalance may be transmitted into a linear uni-directional component of force
by mounting both rotating arms on a rail or frictional wheel carriage.
Usage of two synchronized sets of counterrotating arms to a leg connecting both axes of
rotation, necessarily eliminates the deflecting component of the centrifugal force along the
axes of the counter rotating arms. In this case, the rail and frictional wheel carriage would not
be required since a true linear force has been fashioned.
It is, therefore, an object of the present invention to provide a device that efficiently converts
centrifugal force from rotating members into linear force and linear movement.
It is a further object of the present invention to provide a device useable as a source of
motivation for any vehiclar means by the employment of rotational motion which is converted
into linear motion.
It is yet another object of the present invention to provide an imbalanced centrifugal force in a
given semicircle of the rotational cycle of an object and the usage of the linear components of
the centrifugal force produced to propel a vehicle.
It is another object of the present invention to combine the effects of a plurality of devices
producing a biased centrifugal force to cause linear motion without the necessity of frictional
engagement of the vehicle with a surface of travel.
The invention possesses other objects and advantages as concerns particular features and
characteristics, thereof, which will become apparent as the specification continues. For a
better understanding of the invention, reference is made to the following description.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIG. 1 is a plan view of the device with the counter rotating arms shown in phantom at the
transfer points.

60

FIG. 2 is sectional view taken along line 2--2 of FIG. 1.

FIG. 3 is a broken sectional view taken along line 3--3 of FIG. 2.

FIG. 4 is a broken side elevational view of the mass transfer mechanism in the activated
position.

61

FIG. 5 is broken sectional view taken along line 5--5 of FIG. 4.

FIG. 6 is a broken sectional view taken along line 6--6 of FIG. 4.

FIG. 7 is a broken side elevational view of the mass transfer mechanism in the deactivated
position.

FIG. 8 is a broken sectional view taken along line 8--8 of FIG. 7.

62

FIG. 9 is a broken sectional view taken along line 9--9 of FIG. 7.

FIG. 10 is a broken sectional view taken along line 10--10 of FIG. 7.

FIG. 11 is a fragmentary sectional view showing a pair of devices in side-by-side connection.

63

FIG. 12 is a schematic view showing a pair of devices in side-by-side connection, with the
connecting leg in phantom.

DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

With reference to the drawings, the device or apparatus as a whole is depicted in its entirety
by reference character 10. FIG. 1 shows the device 10 which includes a first arm 12 and a
second arm 14 which counter rotate with respect to one another about an axle 16, FIGS. 1 and
2. The circular paths of the arms 12 and 14 lie in parallel planes such that the arms are
positioned in overlying alignment twice during the rotational cycle of both arms 12 and 14. As
shown by FIG. 1, in partial phantom, the alignment of the two arms takes place one hundred
and eighty degrees (180.degree.) apart and these positions are denoted as the "transfer points I
and II", a fuller explanation of which will be hereinafter provided.
In the present embodiment, the device 10 is contemplated for use on a surface, but the device
may be employed for any method of travel including travel in water, air and space media. As
shown, the device 10 travels on a rail track 18 by the use of wheels rotating about spindles 22
that support frame 24, via forks 26, which are fixed by attached to frame 24 and spindle 22.
The frame 24 secures to axle 16 by the use of flange 28 by any suitable means, such as
welding.
With reference to FIG. 2, driving shaft 30 turns by the energy derived from any source of
power (not shown). Block portion 32 and bearings 34 support shaft 30 to allow smooth axial
turning of the shaft, well known in the art. Shaft 30 includes a miter gear 36, on the end
nearest axle 16, which meshingly engages bevel gear 38 integral with bushing 40, which is
free to slide about the bearing surface 52 circumferentially affixed to axle 16. Flanges 42 and
44 afix to arm 14 such that the rotation of bushing 40 rotates arm 14 about the axis of axle 16.
The upper end of bushing 40 connects to bevel gear 46 which meshingly engages miter gear
48. Stud 50 fixedly engages axle 16 and bearing 54 circumscribes the stud 50. Miter gear 48,
thus rotates about the fixed axis of stud 50. C-rings 56 and 58 prevent the movement of stud
50 and miter gear 48.
Bevel gear 60 meshingly engages miter gear 48 and rotates in the direction opposite to bevel
gear 46. Flange 62, depicted as integral with bevel gear 60, affixes to arm 12 such that arm 12
rotates opposite to arm 14.

64

One end of arm 12 includes a bearing mount 64 which circumferentially holds shaft 66. Pin 68
positions shaft 66 within bearing 64 which has a seal 70. Miter gear 72 affixes to shoulder 74
which surroundingly engages shaft 66. Miter gear 72 meshingly engages bevel gear 76 and
turns shaft 66. Flanges 78 and 80 join to hold bevel gear in a stationary position with respect
to miter gear 72. Stiffeners 82 and 84 strengthen the interconnection of flanges 78 and 80 to
the frame 24.
Universal joint 86 affixes shaft 66 to shaft 88 which passes through bearing mount 90. Stub
92 affixes to base plate 94 which secures to bearing mount 90. Stub 92 passes through an
arcuate slot 96 in arm 12, best depicted in FIG. 3; the purpose of which will be described in
detail as the specification continues. The lower end of stub 92 is capped by washer 98 and nut
100. Stub 92 may travel within the confines of arcuate slot 96 subject to dampening by spring
124.
Shaft 88 engages bearing 102 which fits within hub 104 having wings 106 and 108. Bars 110
and 112 affix to wings 106 and 108 respectively on one end and to masses 114 and 116 on the
other end. Masses 114 and 116 are preferably of equal size; mass and weight, therefore,
balance one another when shaft 88 rotates bars 110 and 112 (which are of equal length) and
the masses 114 and 116. The hub 104 also functions to dampen oscillations upon the transfer
of one of the weights, as will be discussed in detail hereinafter. Arm 14 has a U-shaped
channel 118 between partitions 128 and 129 corresponding in the width dimension to the
width of mass 114 or 116. Opening 120 and 122 receive the fingers (not shown) of mass 114
or the fingers of mass 116 (only exemplar finger 130 shown) dependent upon which mass is
transferred from arm 12 to arm 14.
Pin 132 rides on cam follower 134 which travels a flexible circular cam on track 136. Cam
track 136 is supported by a plurality of blocks, including blocks 138, 140, 142, and 144. Block
140 includes an inclined surface having a handle structure 144 thereattached, such that the
circular track 136 may be lowered to the same level at block 140 as it is at block 138.
The mechanism involved in the actual transfer of one of the masses 114 or 116 may be more
clearly explained by FIGS. 4-10. As an example, mass 116 may be employed, as depicted in
phantom on FIG. 2, as the transferred mass. FIG. 4, showing the mechanism in the activated
position, includes bar 112 having a plate 150 which fits into arcuate channel 152. Bar 112
affixes to plate 150. The combination is capable of holding weight 116 while revolving about
hub 104. As depicted by FIG. 5, the pin, when elevated by the track 136, runs through
partially V-shaped channel 154.
The mass 116 includes two equal portions 156 and 158, each portion respectively enclosed by
caps 160 and 162, having a slidable relationship therebetween. Finger 130 of mass portion
158 slides within openings 164 and into slot 120 when the mass 116 transfers from arm 12 to
arm 14. Spring means 166 urges mass member 158 away from slot 120 while the movement
of pin 132 in channel 154 urges mass member 158 toward slot 120. Mass portion 156 also
includes a finger, spring means, and opening arrangement (not shown) identical to mass
portion 158 such as finger 130, spring means 166, and opening 164, for use with opening 122
(FIG. 2).
Pin 132 includes a slot 168 and a key 170 in arm 14 to prevent rotation of the pin 132 in the
vertical plane during transfer of the mass 116. Mass 114 contains the same mechanism as
mass 116 for the purposes of the transfer, from arm 12 to arm 14, and the masses be
substituted freely to perform the transfer function to evenly distribute wear and tear and the
like.

65

In operation, the device 10 has two counter rotating arms 12 and 14 that are synchronized to
vertically align at two positions within their rotational cycles, where either mass 114 or 116
transfers to and from the first arm 12. As heretofore explained, mass 116 has been arbitrarily
chosen, but proper calibration may employ mass 114 in the transfer mechanism herein
described.
Power from a source drives driving shaft 30 which turns miter gear 36 and bevel gear 38. Arm
14 affixed to bushing 40 rotates in a plane substantially horizontal to the axis of driving shaft
30. Bevel gear 46 turns miter gear 48 which spins bevel gear 60. Arm 12 attached to flange
62, integral with bevel gear 60, rotates in a plane parallel to the plane of arm 14 and in an
opposite direction to the path of rotation of arm 14 through gearing arrangements arms 12 and
14 vertically align at "transfer points I and II", shown on FIG. 1.
Miter gear 72 and bevel gear 76 rotate shaft 88 and turns masses 114 and 116 in a vertical
plane as arm 12 rotates in a horizontal plane. At transfer point I, depicted in FIG. 2, the mass
116 fits between partitions 128 and 129, shown in phantom, of arm 14. At this point, the mass
116 the end of arm 14 has no relative motion therebetween. Just prior to that point, pin 132
enters channel 154 because of the rise in track 136 and spreads portions 156 and 158 apart.
Fingers, shown by exemplar finger 130, enter openings 120 and 122, and bar 112 with affixed
plate 150 rotates out of arcuate channel 152. Thus, mass 116 has been transferred to arm 14,
FIGS. 4-6.
Arm 12 continues its rotation with only mass 114 for one hundred and eighty degrees to
"transfer point II". It should be noted that hub 104 preferably dampens the oscillating motion
produced by mass 114 on the arm 12 by being of a weight equal to the combined weight of
masses 114 and 116. Likewise partitions 128 and 129 should be equal in weight to hub 104,
such that the sum of the weight of masses 116 and partitions 128 and 129 equals the sum of
the weight hub 104 and weight 114. Thus, the device 10 is balanced during the portion of the
cycle of arm 12 between the "transfer points I and II".
With reference to FIG. 3, the stub 92 bears on spring 124 such that the oscillation force of
mass 114 on arm 12 is dampened in one direction to help smooth the motion of arm 12 as it
rotates.
When "transfer point II" is reached, the transfer mechanism reverses, FIGS. 7-10. Pin 132
lowers from channel 154 because of the position of track 134. Fingers, shown by exemplar
130 remove from openings 120 and 122. Plate 150 engages portions 158 and 160, FIG. 9, and
mass 116 again rotates on bar 112 with mass 114.
The mechanical components of device 10 may be sealed in a vacuum with shaft 30 and handle
structure 148 extending therethrough to reduce the effect of air friction on the rotating arms.
When arm 12 includes both masses 114 and 116, axle 16 receives a force along arm 12. This
specifically occurs counterclockwise between "transfer point II" and "transfer point I". This
linear force may be broken into two component forces, one in the direction of the arrow 172
and the other in a force horizontally disposed. The horizontal force, a deflecting force, is
absorbed by the rigidity of rail track 18. Thus, device 10 moves along track 18 in the direction
of the arrow 172. It should be noted that a plurality of pairs of arms identical to arms 12 and
14 may be placed on axle 16 to create a steady force in the direction of arrow 172. The device
10 alone will produce a pulse force during the time arm 12 travels from transfer point II to
transfer point I. The transferring mechanism may be deactivated by pulling handle mechanism
148 and therefore the lower portion of bock 140. The sliding of the upper and lower portions
of block 140 on surface 146, lower arm track 136 such that pin 132 does not enter channel 154

66

and transferring of mass 116 does not occur. Similarly the raising of track 136 one hundred
and eighty degrees from block 146 would reverse the transfer mechanism such that the device
10 would travel in a direction opposite to arrow 172. In other words, raising the track 136 to
activate pin 132 opposite block 140 would brake device 10 moving in the direction of arrow
172 or cause device 10, at rest, to move in a direction opposite to arrow 172.
Device 10 may be used with an identical device to eliminate the need for rail track 18 and its
equivalent. Applicant hereby incorporates, by reference, the specification of his U.S. Pat. No.
3,683,707, issued Aug. 15, 1972, wherein applicant describes the cancellation of horizontal
forces. In particular, column 8, lines 9-38, describes the resolution of forces in the Y axis and
cancellation of the forces in the X axis.
By analogy, a set of devices identical to device 10 may be placed together, preferably side-byside, with a leg 174 connecting identical axles 16 such that identical arms 12 are located at
transfer point I on the first device and transfer point II on the second device FIGS. 11 and 12.
While in the foregoing specification embodiments of the invention have been set forth in
considerable detail for purposes of making a complete disclosure of the invention, it will be
apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art that numerous changes may be made in such
details without departing from the spirit and principles of the invention.

Top ~ Home ~ Catalog ~ Links

rexresearch.com

67

To the stars by electromagnetic propulsion

Starships, spaceships to the stars will shortly be a practical possibility, using a variety of
designs now being developed. Our scientists and engineers have this ability; hopefully the
initiative and finance will follow shortly.
Various "clubs" and societies now exist to do this:(a) INTERSTELLAR PROPULSION SOCIETY
Space Propulsion Department, AEA Technology U.K. (and USA)
Paul Latham, Manager.
(b) Symposium on Electromagnetic Launch Technology
IEEE Transactions on Magnetics Vol. 25 No.1 Jan 1989
(c) THE MILLENNIAL PROJECT
Electromagnetic Launcher
P.O. Box 347, Rifle, Colorado 81650, U.S A.
(d) PROJECT MAGNET
Magnetic Propulsion
Box 839, 9037 Royal Street, Fort Langley, British Columbia, Canada
and many others.
Man's journey to the stars began when Armstrong and Aldrin first reached the moon on 24th
December 1968. This was by a chemical three stage Saturn V rocket. Since then very little has
been done.
Bill Berry (head of the propulsion unit at the E.S.A. research centre in the Netherlands) and
Paul Latham both suggest electric propulsion systems will be used in future propulsion
systems.

Machine (yellow wheels & black motor) in lower part of vertical test rig with control electronics
to right.
This article describes a method of converting electrical power into a propulsive force that
potentially generates a large propulsive thrust. In this machine thrust is produced (by rotating
and reciprocating masses, solenoids on ferrous rods) in three ways:(a) Centrifugal Thrust

68

(b) Momentum Thrust

(c) Impulse Thrust

CENTRIFUGAL THRUST
An outward force F (see Figure 1) is produced when a mass M is rotated at an angular
velocity w at a radius R
F = Mw2R

Figure 2 shows the trajectories (distorted) of two opposing masses M (solenoids), these
solenoids are in a vertical plane and rotate at a speed w (radians/sec) and reciprocate in
and out on ferrous rods; the opposing solenoids are joined by "tie" rods such that as one
moves inwards the other moves outwards. At an angle theta (Figure 2) a current pulse is
applied to the solenoids. By an electromagnetic reaction, the top solenoid is forced
inwards and the bottom solenoid forced outwards. As they are also rotating, if the
parameters are correctly adjusted, 1/2 a revolution later they will have exchanged
positions. This action will continue:For the uppermost solenoid
F1 = Mw2R
For the lower solenoid
F2 = Mw2r
giving a net upward force
F = F1 - F2 = Mw2(R - r)
Other angular positions give a vertically resolved force (the horizontal component is
arranged to cancel out).

MOMENTUM THRUST Figures 3 & 4

As shown, in Figure 4, the inward moving solenoid is brought to a rest and gives up its
momentum energy into compressing the spring, which is rotating on the FERROUS

69

JUMP rods. This exerts a force on the hub, the solenoids are arranged to be vertical at
that time, thus a maximum vertical force is generated on the hub.

IMPULSE THRUST
When the solenoids are pulsed when nearly vertical as in Figure 2 there will be a
REACTION FORCE upwards on the upper ferrous rod F1 and upwards on the lower
ferrous rod F2. These upward reaction impulse forces will be transferred to the machine
through the bearing and hub, Figure 4 shows the solenoids vertical, with the lower spring
fully compressed (for clarity only one spring is shown) exerting maximum upward thrust
on the hub, here tending to lift the machine. The solenoid velocity is instantaneously
zero, it will shortly afterwards start to move downwards under the decompressing action
of the spring. After a small rotation theta (Figure 2) the solenoids are pulsed. This
reciprocating and rotating action will continue.

Referring to Figure 4 the spring will be fully compressed when vertical if the following
parameters are correct:(a) Spring Stiffness
(b) Rotation Speed
(c) Radial Speed
This will give maximum upward thrust to the hub and hence bearings and machine. A servo
system has been designed to control the parameters above. This is part electronics and part
computer. Parametric pumping of the solenoid current pulses will be used to optimise the power
consumption by controlling the pulse width. Simple calculations show that at lower speeds the
momentum thrust is larger, at higher speeds the centrifugal force is larger.
In a sense the energy of the pulsing is used twice in the machine (due to rotation of the
solenoids); initially when the solenoids are first pulsed the REACTION forces on the jump rods
is upwards. Then half a revolution later, the "momentum thrust" is at a maximum, and again
upwards.
BALANCING OUT MACHINE HORIZONTAL THRUST AND TORQUE

70

On the prototype machine there are two pairs of contra-rotating solenoids s1, s2, s3 and s4.
These are to balance out the horizontal components of thrust. This results in a twisting torque
(see Figure 5);

which in turn can be balanced out by two more pairs of contra-rotating solenoids s5, s6, s7, & s8,
as shown diagramatically in Figure 6.

When correctly balanced this configuration results in a force in one direction (upward here).

71

However this direction of thrust can be simply changed by varying the timing of the solenoid
current pulses.
PROTOTYPE MACHINE PERFORMANCE
The machine has been run mainly at about 5 revs/sec; above about 8 revs/sec the lifting effect
stops due to incorrect action.
The machine exhibits instability when run at over about 11 revs/sec, due to the inherent
unbalanced nature of the solenoids i.e. a stronger framework is required.
1. IN A VERTICAL THRUST MODE
A force of about 10 Newtons was obtained, with a suitable counterweight the machine
has risen under the action of this force on many occasions.
2. HORIZONTAL THRUST MODE
The machine was mounted on a trolley (total force to move = 13 Newtons). When trolley
movement was initiated (i.e. stiction force overcome) then the motion was continuous.
CONCLUSION
The machine has been observed to give a force of about 10 Newtons in horizontal and vertical
modes or directions. Agreeing with simple theory calculated from F = Mw2R.
CHANGE OF THRUST DIRECTION
The direction of generated thrust can be changed from horizontal to vertical very quickly
(actually in 1 machine revolution i.e. at 5 revs/sec in 200 msec); giving extreme manouverability
when used to propel a moving vehicle.
SOLENOID TESTING
A simple jump test rig was constructed to test the efficiency of different types of solenoid. This
basically measured the velocity of the solenoid in response to an applied current pulse (current
pulses of about 10 msec being typical).Many types of solenoid were tested; a maximum velocity
of about 25 m/sec was obtained for a very light coil. In practice about 4 m/sec was the
maximum obtained from a heavier (0.16Kg) machine solenoid.
With a more efficient electromagnetic structure, higher velocities can be obtained (Rail Gun =
400 m/sec). The present solenoids are only about 1% efficient in converting the applied current
pulses into mechanical movement of the solenoids.
Research is now going on to improve this efficiency using more complex electromagnetic
structures.
ELECTRICAL POWER REQUIREMENT
If used to provide thrust for a spaceship, electrical power close to the Sun can be provided by
solar panels, but beyond the orbit of Mars another source of electrical energy must be used,
such as nuclear power.
CONSIDERATION OF PHYSICAL LAWS
Misconceptions of Newton's Laws are often put forward to the effect that this machine will not
operate as discussed here.
Considering Newton's 1st Law:"A body will remain in a state of rest or uniform motion unless acted upon by an external force".
Rockets and jet engines use the principle of momentum exchange in which there is no external
force, but an energy interchange. Similarly this machine has an energy (electrical) interchange
to generate a force.
Regarding Newton's 3rd Law:"To every action there is an equal and opposite reaction".
Considering CENTRIPETAL & CENTRIFUGAL forces for a mass rotating on a rod: the
centripetal force is directed towards the centre of rotation and acts on the rotating mass,
accelerating it inwards and causing it to move in a circle. The reaction to this force acts at the

72

centre of rotation, in an outward direction, and is called the centrifugal force. This is the force
which generates thrust through the bearing and framework.

Einstein showed acceleration and gravity are equivalent.

In this machine considering:1. The Centrifugal Force
The centripetal force acts inwards accelerating the mass (a solenoid) inwards. The
centrifugal force acts outwards (when vertical upwards) on the hub, bearing and
machine. This is an upward accelerating force.
2. The "Momentum Force"
The momentum upwards of the solenoid when vertical compresses the spring
decelerating the solenoid, but accelerating the hub and hence machine upwards.
These two accelerations both generate forces opposing gravity.

Many (at least 12) patents U.K., P.C.T., U.S.A. have been granted to machines converting
electrical rotatory energy to a "linear" mechanical force. Some of these machines are rather
complex but all are based on the centrifugal idea.
Many applications are possible such as lifting and propelling helicopters and aircraft type
machines, pushing boats and submarines, etc. A number of scientists and engineers have
viewed this machine or a video recording of it working agreeing it works successfully.
FUTURE WORK
Detailed design and testing of the servo system is now in progress, along with rebuilding of the
prototype. Considerable development needs to be done on the present prototype for a useful
engine to result.
LONG TERM FUTURE WORK
Solid state engines can perhaps be developed:(a) Electrons rotate around in the atom with a linear speed of about 500 miles/sec. If controlled
"jumping" of electrons from one level to another (orbital radius) can be achieved, large forces
could be obtained.
(b)Nucleons rotate in the nucleus with relativistic speeds. If these can be used, similarly to (a)
ENORMOUS FORCES WOULD RESULT.
For further information, such as photographs and a VHS video recording of machine rising,
contact:e-mail mick@mtjf.demon.co.uk
phone Mick UK 01309 673120
or write M T French, Lynard, Tytler Street, Forres, Moray, SCOTLAND, IV36 0EL

73

PRESENT STATE : STATE OF PROJECT (25 7 99)

The construction of the electronic modules is now nearly complete. Although on testing the
complete system some redsign may be nescessary .
As mentioned the system outputs analog quantities, which are digitized for the computer data
logger by the Picolog 11 channel A / D convertor, some analog multiplexing of signals to the
computer may be nesescary. With a "trade off" between no of channels digitized and speed of
data collection. Additional work still needs to be done for interfacing the analog quantities from
the machine to the Picolog data convertor.
The results as obtained will be outputed on to the W.W.W until the WEB site is full.A lot of data
is anticipated and an interpretation key to the data will be given.

TESTING MACHINE
A variety of springs to fit on the jump rods of different k,s ( spring constant ) are about to be
ordered to allow for difference in actual test performance at the design speed of 5 rotations /
sec.
The SLIDER potentiometers indicating the solenoid radial position have been tested at the
design speed, on the machine and found to give no contact trouble. However unfortunately log
potentiometers have had to be used and no exponential to linear interpolation circuitry has
been succesful in practise. To start with these log potentiomers will be used directly in log mode
, although log/linear conversion may be nescessary for the machine to operate corectly.

74

75

GCT: Straight Talk (PDF)

This Hungarian startup spent $1.2 million to demonstrate gravitational shielding effects
in mercury. Read our interview for details. click here

76
Instrument Housing
This cutaway of the concept instrument housing shows the modular design, built to
facilitate a number of different scientific experiments. click here

77
Propulsion System
This cutaway graphic shows the mercury containment chamber surrounding the
instrument housing in the concept prototype. click here

GCT: Breakthrough AG-Startup!

Gravity Control Technologies is a next-generation company with vision: the Hungarian startup has already invested
1.2 million in gravity research, which they claim has paid substantial scientific dividends. Their initial prototypes
showed a remarkable 15% reduction in the weight of a mercury-plasma test sample, and they're seeking additional
funding for a much larger follow-up experiment that should completely lift off the scale!

GCT Prototype Cutaways

The key to GCT's approach to gravitational shielding comes from monatomic elements -- specially prepared
metals with modified electron-shell configurations that have been proposed to interact with gravity in a "high-spin,
superdeformed state". This means that small-scale Quantum Effects like gravity-shielding should become
apparent on a large scale, much in the same way that a Bose-Einstein Condensate exhibits Macro-Scale QM
Effects.

15% Grav-Shielding Breakthrough!

Mercury Ignitron Experiment

Click the picture for a closeup of the digital-measurement showing GCT's 15% Antigravity
breakthrough!
"The mercury-plasma Antigravity device we built was based on a modified Ignitron (a high-energy switching
device). A self contained, remote controlled unit ran off of four 7.2Ah SLA batteries. We carried out weight
reduction studies using a torsion type balance. If our theory was correct we had to see weight reduction once the
unit was activated theory dictating that monatomic elements would interact with gravitational fields. The initial
lab bench prototype was capable of flowing up to 11 amps of current. 8 amps were needed to keep the Ignitron lit."
"When we hanged the assembly it showed about 5 grams of weight reduction, which was interesting and appeared
to confirm theory. The entire device weighted about 10 kilograms with batteries. The mercury, which actually did
the work, was between 50 to 100 grams. There was no way to tell correctly since it was sealed inside the Ignitron."
"So we had some initial positive data. The next step was to see if the effect was scalable. We built a second
device that contained two DC-DC converters. The manufacturer assured us that these devices were capable of
operating in parallel. Their function was the generation of up to 21 amps, based on four 7.2Ah batteries. We
needed 8 amps to keep the Ignitron lit. We figured that if we increased current from 8 amps to 21 amps we should
see some scalability. It took 4 months to build the unit. We tested it on the same torsion type balance used in the
previous experiment; the only difference being is we switched to a floor mounted configuration (some pictures of
the balance on the website)."
"Once the device was activated we were able to increase current from 8 amps to about 20 amps. And what we
observed was scalability in terms of weight reduction. As more current flowed through the device the larger the
weight reduction was. As current was throttled back, some weight returned. IT was rather interesting to wants the
process, until the unit stopped functioning." -- Victor Rozsnany, GCT Space... click here
Related Info
GCT Space Online- Visit the official website for GCT Space, updated with new graphics and more
scientific info for 2005! Click Here

78

Straight Talk: 2005- This 15-page article describes GCT's plans & breakthrough science in depth
(PDF)! Click Here

Victor Rozsnyay- Check out American Antigravity's interview in WinMedia format on our interviews
page! Click Here

Email Contact - Get in touch with GCT's Victor Rozsnyay via email! Click Here

X-Prize?- GCT was ready to go, but the commission got cold feet -- learn how GCT nearly made it
into the competition! Click Here

Joe Firmage - This dot-com genius funded GCT's initial research, before he refocused on his
ManyOne startup. Click Here

79

GIROSCOPIO PROPULSORE

Una delle macchine semplici pi straordinarie tra quelle esistenti senza dubbio il giroscopio.
Si tratta essenzialmente di una massa cilindrica ben equilibrata che compie, seguendo precise
leggi che ne regolano la rotazione veloce attorno all'asse centrale, delle azioni del tutto
particolari. Uno dei principi fondamentali di un giroscopio montato su supporto cardanico con
tre assi di rotazione che lo lascia libero di ruotare in tutte le direzioni, quello di mantenere
sempre fisso il proprio orientamento qualunque sia la posizione nello spazio della base su cui il
giroscopio stesso appoggiato anche se essa varia da un momento all'altro. Si tratta di una
propriet normalmente utilizzata per la definizione della rotta degli aerei e dei mezzi nautici. Un
altro impiego importante del dispositivo di cui si discute, basato sulle sue straordinarie doti di
stabilit, quello inerente l'attenuazione del rollio delle navi in caso di mare mosso. E' infine
noto come un giroscopio che ruoti attorno ad un piano leggermente inclinato rispetto alla
verticale generi una spinta orizzontale orientata nel verso del movimento rotatorio. Quelli citati
sono fenomeni provocati dalla rotazione veloce di masse perfettamente equilibrate rispetto
all'asse di rotazione.
Si vuole ora esaminare un giroscopio assolutamente particolare in quanto dotato della
possibilit di modificare il suo assetto tramite creazione di uno squilibrio, opportunamente
regolato, delle sue masse rotanti. Il risultato che se ne vuole ritrarre la trasformazione del
moto circolare in moto rettilineo utilizzabile in molteplici applicazioni. Ad esempio se installato in
un natante il nuovo giroscopio potrebbe sostituire sia l'elica che il timone consentendo di

80

applicare al mezzo la spinta in avanti o di lato in una qualsivoglia direzione come pure di
arrestare il natante con una spinta volta all'indietro.

Il propulsore in progetto composto da due rotori concentrici, del tipo schematicamente

rappresentato nella fig.1 allegata, e che girano in sincronia ma con sensi di rotazione opposti in
modo che gli elementi rotanti costituiscano sempre delle coppie simmetriche rispetto all'asse
principale del sistema.
Ogni rotore si compone di due parti distinte e cio, in primo luogo, dalla piastra fissa di base la
cui caratteristica fondamentale quella di essere dotata di una grande apertura circolare entro
la quale ruota il secondo elemento costituito da due masse l'una diametralmente opposta
all'altra ed ambedue spinte da guide rotanti attorno all'asse del perno centrale cui sono fissate
radialmente. Le masse sono libere di scorrere lungo le guide e pertanto, in virt della forza
centrifuga, tendono ad allontanarsi dal centro di rotazione portandosi a ridosso della apertura
circolare della piastra di base sulla quale esercitano in continuazione una spinta radiale.
In definitiva sono presenti quattro masse (due per ogni rotore), le quali, considerando un regime
di lavoro standard a velocit costante del motore che imprime il moto all'insieme, percorrono in
ogni caso una traiettoria circolare definita dalla circonferenza della apertura citata. Pur girando
ad una velocit che mantiene nel tempo il medesimo numero di giri per minuto, la velocit
lineare periferica delle masse rimane costante solo allorch l'asse del rotore e quello del foro
circolare della piastra sono coincidenti (vedi fig. 2). In questo caso, considerato che le due
piastre sono intimamente collegate tra di loro in modo da costituire un blocco unico, risultano
applicate al dispositivo quattro forze aventi tutte lo stesso valore e, due per due, con direzioni
contrapposte per cui si elidono a vicenda (vedi fig. 2). La forza risultante finale nulla ed il

81

dispositivo non , a tale regime detto di riposo, n pi n meno che un normale giroscopio.

Quando invece il rotore viene spostato allontanandolo dall'asse principale della piastra di base, la velocit
lineare delle masse varia continuamente con una corrispondente modificazione anche della spinta dovuta
alla forza centrifuga. In pratica ognuna delle quattro masse, essendo libera di scorrere lungo le guide, ha,
in quest'ultimo caso chiamato regime di lavoro, una velocit angolare costante ma un raggio di rotazione
reale che varia continuamente. Ne consegue, come detto, una continua variazione nella spinta centrifuga.
Ad esempio se il centro di rotazione viene spostato, facendo riferimento alle figure 2 e 3, verso l'alto, le
forze che risultano applicate al dispositivo sono quelle schematicamente rappresentate nella fig. 3 ed esse,
a loro volta scomposte nelle componenti parallele agli assi principali, indicano la presenza di quattro
sforzi orizzontali che si elidono a vicenda essendo, a due a due, contrapposti e della medesima entit.
Sussistono poi due forze verticali dirette verso il basso della figura che sono nettamente superiori alla
coppia di forze che vi si oppongono cio a quelle dirette verso l'alto. La risultante generale una forza che
varia da istante ad istante ma che sempre diretta verso il basso della figura, nel mentre non sussistono
forze aventi altre direzioni.
Per quanto riguarda le forze di reazione all'azione esercita dalla rotazione delle masse, si fa notare che,
essendo queste ultime libere di scorrere lungo le guide, la reazione stessa non pu essere che di tipo
angolare e in ogni caso formata da coppie di spinte contrapposte che si annullano a vicenda.
In definitiva la risultante del moto rotatorio descritto una forza avente direzione definita dalle modalit
di spostamento dei rotori e che, se applicata al natante di cui all'esempio di prima, in grado di
imprimergli una spinta che possibile orientare in tutte le direzioni. Se, ad esempio, lo spostamento
avviene verso destra, il natante andr a destra, se spostato all'indietro rispetto alla direzione di marcia, la

82

spinta tende a frenare il veicolo. Si tratta di una spinta pulsante per, facendo ruotare i rotori ad alta
velocit, gli impulsi risultano cos ravvicinati da farla risultare, praticamente, continua. Sar il veicolo,
con la sua notevole massa, a far da volano regolarizzatore della spinta. Se necessario sar sempre
possibile migliorare ulteriormente i risultati aumentando il numero delle masse di ciascun rotore e cio
portandole da due a quattro oppure a otto od anche pi.
Chi scrive queste note non ha una grande conoscenza delle leggi che vigono nel moto dei corpi nello
spazio. E' quindi possibile che le spinte generate dalle masse rotanti siano diverse da quelle indicate, che
non siano, ad esempio, sempre in direzione radiale. Si pu per affermare con certezza che tali spinte,
comunque orientate, sono simmetriche rispetto all'asse principale e che, come gi spiegato, il risultato
finale registra delle componenti trasversali che si annullano a vicenda ed una forza risultante
assolutamente diretta in un unico senso definibile a piacere, il che quanto interessa ai fini da
raggiungere.
Occorre a questo punto precisare che il rotore n. 2 prima descritto solo una figura teorica citata allo
scopo di rendere comprensibile le azioni in gioco. Nella realt esso deve essere sdoppiato in due parti
identiche e ciascuna con le masse ridotte ad una met del valore prima considerato al fine di ottenere dei
pesi esattamente equivalenti a quelli originari. I due minirotori, che vengono cos a sostituire il rotore n. 2,
devono essere installati con tutti gli assi di rotazione assolutamente coincidenti ma, al tempo stesso,
ubicati l'uno al di sopra e l'altro al di sotto del rotore n.1 allo scopo di poter svolgere esattamente la
funzione prima indicata ma, fiancheggiando da ambo i lati l'altro rotore, evitare anche che abbia a
verificarsi la rotazione del dispositivo attorno ad un asse perpendicolare a quello principale come si
verificherebbe nel caso i rotori fossero solo due e fossero posti l'uno sopra l'altro.

Anche se non espressamente indicato, sottinteso che tutte le parti mobili del dispositivo sono
munite degli accessori come cuscinetti a sfere, bronzine, impianto di lubrificazione ecc. ecc. atti

83

a ridurre al minimo gli attriti.

Onde migliorare l'effetto giroscopico dell'insieme sarebbe bene che la rotazione fosse impressa
da un motore elettrico avente l'asse coincidente con quello dei rotori. Motore e giroscopio cos
installati potrebbero essere contenuti in una cassa a tenuta ermetica entro la quale mantenere
il vuoto al fine di ridurre l'effetto frenante dell'aria nei riguardi delle delle masse rotanti.
Il dispositivo propulsore in argomento potrebbe trovare numerose applicazioni potendo,
potenzialmente, essere usato per imprimere velocit a tutti i veicoli a motore, e tutte le volte che
si debba spostare una oggetto in una qualunque direzione. Dovendolo applicare alle automobili
si possono prevedere almeno due distinte possibilit. Come propulsore unico il dispositivo
sembrerebbe atto ad imprimere e mantenere la velocit ad un veicolo avente le ruote in folle
cio libere di girare attorno al proprio asse ed anche di orientarsi in una qualsiasi direzione:
sar il giroscopio che, letteralmente, trasciner il veicolo nella direzione scelta dall'operatore
mediante lo spostamento dei rotori. I vantaggi sono evidenti: ottima tenuta di strada sia in
rettifilo che in curva, anche in presenza di pavimentazione sdrucciolevole, perch non pi
affidata, come accade attualmente, all'attrito fra gomma e pavimentazione, grande stabilit
dovuta alla presenza del giroscopio, possibilit di effettuare spostamenti laterali per
parcheggiare in aree poco pi lunghe del veicolo, ecc. Il dispositivo potrebbe essere installato,
in alternativa a quanto detto, quale sussidio al motore tradizionale per offrire alcuni dei vantaggi
citati.
Come gi spiegato la limitata conoscenza della teoria inerente il moto dei gravi da parte
dell'autore pone una grossa remora sulla validit del tema fin qui svolto per cui si renderebbe
necessaria una verifica teorica generale ed una simulazione delle varie funzioni tramite modello
in scala ridotta. Si invitano pertanto i lettori a collaborare con la critica ai concetti esposti e con
suggerimenti volti a migliorarne i contenuti. Ove esistesse la possibilit di costruzione del
modello a modica spesa da parte di qualche dilettante appassionato di meccanica, l'autore
potrebbe contribuirvi direttamente.

84

A Possible propulsion method

for a UFO or future craft
My Theory of creation, My theory for the meaning of life, my propulsion idea
for a future craft, my scaled down universe, my shipping idea, my emergency
train stop idea plus my point locking idea, my link page and more.

I feel that any alien craft, must use the following type of
propulsion, or very similar. The reason I am sure of this is because
this method fits in with the many accounts that involve the motion
of these craft. Like rapidly speeding up, and more or less stopping
dead. Turning right angles at speed, and the accounts of bodies of
water bulging up under them.
The method I put forward now will explain that any occupants and
any loose objects would not be subjected to any G. forces, a glass of
water would not even fall over. The craft would not even suffer any
damage from friction in the atmosphere.

I have thought hard on a new way to propel a craft, and what I have
come up with, is not an anti-gravity craft as such, but by the way it
is moved, gravity and G forces would not affect it.

85

When fuel is burnt, to push or pull a vehicle, the force is felt by an

occupant by being pressed back into a seat when accelerating
because the seat is fixed to the vehicle.
I feel we will find a way to impel every individual atom of a vehicle
and also it's occupants to move in a desired direction. In other
words we will impel every atom of the craft and every atom of the
occupants to move. The person or alien in the above example would
not have any feeling of being pressed into there seat. They are
being impelled to move at the same speed, and in the same
direction as the seat and the vehicle.
A force applied to each atom would mean acceleration or right
angle turns would not even spill a glass of water. The craft ideally
would be circular and flat like the shape that often describes a UFO.
The impelling energy devices for the best effect would be
positioned as in the sketch below, so that objects and occupants are
not put under a stretching force, and ensuring every atom moves in
the same direction. The force of the impelling devices could be set
to energise atoms for a short distance outside the craft, impelling
the air molecules to move also, removing any
friction on the craft.
Other than heat, magnetism and nuclear what new methods will be
found to induce atoms to move, and in mass to move an object.
Once we can move a small object it will not be long before we build
a craft similar to the one I have put forward. I do feel that an alien
craft may use a similar method.
David Croston.

86

Alien UFO's

UFO AREA

If you want to contact me.

Due to email address extractors and the amount of Spam I get please type in
small case with no spaces, Decart 2 uk (the At key) Yahoo (Dot) Com

My home page. * My Theory of Creation. * My Shipping idea.

My Link page. * The Balance and Written below.
My scaled down Universe.
My Emergency train stop idea plus point locking idea.
My Theory of the meaning of life.

Copyright information. First posted May 2000. Revised 11th February 2006

87

88

89

90

91

92

93

94

95

96

97

98

99

Franco Montefuscoli
Dal libro L'elettrotecnica e l'elettromagnetismo che non c'
Sigaro volante a propulsione elettrostatica

L'aereonave che non c'.

Secondo gli ultimi esperimenti da me condotti vista la notevole spinta ottenuta dai pi recenti esperimenti
sui motori elettrostatici si prospetta la possibilit di realizzare un'aereomobile a lamina stagna sostenuto
da gas elio per far s che l'elio introdotto non abbia bisogno di rabbocchi ma rimanga chiuso nell'involucro
praticamente in eterno. L'elettricit necessaria al funzionamento dei motori elettrostatici (silenziosi e
senza parti meccaniche) viene ricavata dai pannelli fotovoltaici installati sopra il sigaro per funzionare.
Praticamente non consuma niente!

100

Esperimenti di elettrodinamica tra una striscia di alluminio e il campo magnetico della terra.

Spiegazione per la ripetizione dell'esperimento

La striscia deve essere alimentata in corrente continua a 12V 10A che quasi un corto circuito, la
striscia di alluminio ricavata da una confezione di domopak di quelle per avvolgere e conservare
gli alimenti, le dimensioni della striscia d'alluminio sono le seguenti, lunghezza 25-30 cm,
larghezza 1 cm. Appena viene data corrente la striscia d'alluminio si sollever verso l'alto in
maniera incredibile lasciando intravvedere la possibilit con questo esperimento di costruire
un'aereomobile che galleggia sul campo magnetico della terra.

101

ANTIGRAVIT
Veicolo antigravitazionale a gravit 0
Il potente campo magnetico delle tre bobine scherma la gravit e quindi tutto l'insieme senza peso.

Spiegazioni
Il principio di funzionamento molto semplice, il potente flusso magnetico uscente dalle bobine
talmente potente da fare in modo che il flusso gravitazionale sottostante non riesce a passare e di
conseguenza la bobina galleggia su di esso avendo perso peso!
Il flusso magnetico uscente da ogni bobina di 150 Tesla.
14/12/2005
Peter Pan

102

Il principio di funzionamento semplice, il potente flusso magnetico uscente dalle bobine talmente
potente da fare in modo che il flusso gravitazionale non riesce a passare di conseguenza la bobina
galleggia su di esso avendo perso ogni peso.

103

PROPULSIONE ELETTROMAGNETICA AUTOSOSTENUTA

Di M.J.G.Polonyi

Secondo alcuni non possibile creare momento meccanico solo da energia

elettromagnetica racchiusa, perci un postulato ovvio che nello stato stazionario in cui
la materia a riposo e in cui non ci sono onde sfuggenti, non ci pu essere momento
elettromagnetico.
Supponiamo una disposizione di bobine di Helmholtz, per esempio due bobine piatte
separate da una distanza uguale al raggio di una bobina. Se applicata una corrente
alternata su ciascuna bobina, sar generato un campo elettromagnetico da ciascuna di
esse. Quindi apparir un effetto di attrazione e repulsione alla frequenza delle correnti e
dei campi applicati, su ciascuna bobina, dovuto al campo generato dall'altra bobina.
Ora si pone la domanda: possibile che, invece dell'attrazione e della repulsione tra le
bobine, si sperimenti una forza nella stessa direzione ? In altri termini: se si montano su
un carro, quest'ultimo si muover in una certa direzione ?
Apparentemente possibile, almeno teoricamente, perch non la corrente ma il campo
generato da detta corrente che reagisce con l'altra bobina e, poich ci vuole un certo
tempo perch il campo attraversi lo spazio tra le bobine, proprio da scoprire una
disposizione che crei una forza unidirezionale.
Se, (a) la frequenza sufficientemente alta cos che la distanza 'D' tra le due bobine sia un
quarto della lunghezza d'onda, (b) ambedue i campi sono della stessa frequenza, e (c) sono
in fase quando incontrano una bobina (essi saranno in fase opposta quando raggiungono
la seconda bobina), quindi apparir una forza alternando ogni bobina, ma questa forza
punter sempre nella stessa direzione, poich una delle bobine (la prima) sar sempre
"spinta" dal campo della bobina di ritardo, che alternativamente sar sempre "tirata" dal
campo della bobina principale.
Ora, per evitare la radiazione elettromagnetica, l'apparato deve essere chiuso. La chiusura
agir anche sulla lunghezza d'onda e sulla forza, a seconda della forma e della qualit
della recinzione. Ma questo significa anche che l'energia elettromagnetica non irragger
(oltre alle perdite termiche) e pu essere fatta ricircolare, per esempio con un effetto di
"ruotazione elettromagnetica".
Questo dispositivo simile a un accoppiatore direzionale nella tecnologia delle
microonde, in cui l'energia elettromagnetica si propaga in una direzione sola.
Se l'energia pu propagarsi solo in una direzione in una guida d'onda chiusa, entrambe le
estremit della guida d'onda possono essere connesse in una forma ad anello, e
conseguentemente momento meccanico angolare pu essere generato a volont.
Ovviamente:
- le due fonti elettromagnetiche, sfasate nel tempo e nello spazio, daranno questo
effetto. La forza sar massima quando le sorgenti sono un quarto di una lunghezza
d'onda, nello spazio e nel tempo.
- Esso pu essere chiuso in una scatola metallica di qualsiasi forma, come una cavit
risonante, che sar capace di muoversi.
- Quando i campi sono in fase non c' alcuna forza risultante ma un aumento nella

104

massa elettromagnetica!
Per concentrare il campo ed evitare linee di dispersione magnetica, pu essere usato un
nucleo di materiale magnetico per aumentare la forza. Il materiale magnetico rallenter la
propagazione delle onde di campo magnetico, permettendo di diminuire sia la frequenza
sia la distanza tra le bobine. Questo nucleo si comporta proprio come una cavit risonante.
La grandezza delle forze coivolte molto piccola, perci difficile allestire un
esperimento che dimostri il principio, poich sono necessarie frequenze e campi molto
alti.
Per due bobine montate su un nucleo di ferrite, con una permeabilit relativa di 10,
separate di 6 cm, 28.2 A/giro a 395 MHz e 156 ohm/giro, genereranno 1 Newton, cio
124 KVA! Pi le perdite.
Ma, secondo il "Principio di Equivalenza", se possibile creare una forza, nello spazio,
solo da energia elettromagnetica racchiusa, sarebbe possibile creare l'inverso, cio energia
elettromagnetica da un "campo di forza".
Precedentemente l'autore suggeriva che la "densit di momento elettromagnetico" era il
link (mancante) tra la meccanica e l'elettrodinamica. Ci suggerisce che la gravitazione
non niente altro che "onde in fase", simili a quelle che si sviluppano nelle guide a
microonde e nelle cavit risonanti. Ma perch esistano delle "onde in fase", ci deve essere
un campo elettromagnetico di quella frequenza gi presente, richiamando alla memoria il
concetto di "etere" e che tutta la massa e l'intero universo non sono altro che una
gigantesca "cavit risonante".

105

Quantum Electro-Gravitics
Vortex Implosion Based Propulsion Systems
Advanced Aeronautical/Space Energy Concepts
Proposal Content and Format
Project Title:
Quantum Electro-Gravitics Implo-Propulsion Systems
Principal Investigator
Robert A. Patterson
Date Jan. 18, 2004
Technology Proposal Volume I
Abstract
a. Advanced Concept Description
b. Advanced Concept Development Work Plan
c. Encompassed Fields of Research
d. Patent Applied For
e. Stage of Development

Technology Proposal Volume I

Abstract
a. Advanced Concept Description
Gravitic Unit and Power Plant
Herein disclosed this application express a multidisciplinary concept resulting in an Optically Pumped
antenna based system for converting high frequency quantum electrodynamics radiation, e.g. ZPE,
Light, Atoms etc... and converting same into a QEG-Implo-Propulsion system. The QEG-system
includes a pair of dielectric structures positioned strategically proximal to each other, which receive
incident electromagnetic radiation.
The volumetric sizes of the component structures may be tuned so that they resonate at the atomic
transition frequency of the incident radiation so that secondary radiation emitted therefrom at

106

resonance may interfere destructively/constructively with each other producing either resonant
oscillations or a beat frequency radiation which is at a frequency that is amenable to conversion to
electrical and/or implosive/ propulsive energy extracted within any environment.
An antenna receives the beat frequency radiation, which is emitted from a tandem pair of reverse wave
cavities. The reverse wave beat frequency radiation from the antenna is transmitted into space through
a suitable conductor or wave-guide, said energy having a desired voltage and a reversed waveform
such that the emitted energy returns into the system for recycling and amplification purposes .

Craft:
In an externally winged craft comprising a selectively shaped vacuum cohesive fuselage and means for
providing lift and propulsion for an aircraft wherein the aircraft is constructed using a predetermined
composition of high temperature superconductive ceramic material a high-k high-density dielectric
ceramic capable of generating an enormous electrostatic vortex lifting force when energized in
conjunction with the QEG-propulsion system and power plant whereby said system and components
collectively comprise a superconductive electrical energy and implosive based propulsion system.

b. Advanced Concept Development Work Plan

To seek out and consult with engineers, to develop a fledgling R&D Company, with the idea of
recruiting volunteers with respect to developing a team approach for the purpose of developing a
laboratory environment conducive to further advances in the field of Quantum Electro-Gravitics as
presented in this article. To seek out and obtain funding including any and all Space-Race or ZPE
programs e.g.
XPrize http://www.xprize.org/ & SEAS http://www.seaspower.com/ US Gov. or Foreign funding
sources.

c. Encompassed Fields of Research

To qualify as a team member applicants must have a background in one or more of the fields listed
below:
Vortex Science
Electronics
Quantum Physics
Superconductivity
ZPE
QED and Cavity-QED Optics Technology
Microwave, Wave-guide and Antenna technology
Flat Transformer Technology
Free Energy Principles
Tesla Technology
Aerodynamics
Lifters Technology

Back-engineering skills
Grant Writing

Note: Entrants must be 18 years of age or older to participate.

d. Patent Applied For

107

Patent Pending Jan. 24, 2003

Pending Awards: Jun. 2004

Rolex for Enterprise Awards
Pending Experiments
Battery powered High Voltage test of the QEG-propulsion unit

e. Stage of Development
Quantum Electro-Gravitics Implosion Based Propulsion Unit

Cavity-QED i.e. a selectively designed, Atom-Coupled Optical Waveguide, which resonates at or

near the atomic transition frequency squeezes atoms out of the environment, thereby energizing a
selectively designed Ferrite Bead Coil Transformer that induces a resonant rise response into the
first stage amplification system comprising a:
Tesla type, lumped transmission line tank circuit spark gap transmitter, which in turn energizes the

108

reverse wave amplification stage and gravitic propulsion system comprising:

Reverse wave radio cavities/beat frequency generators acting similar to turbo chargers, which
energize a twin set of TTBrown type plate capacitors.
Systems Impedance matching via Delta Antenna System
Cavity atoms experience significant squeezing under the influence of strong driving fields. These
squeezing effects are intrinsically connected to the polarization of dressed state populations by
tuning the cavity appropriately close to the atomic transition frequency we may induce a nonvanishing inversion of the dressed-state's setting the standard for optimal conditions for atomic
squeezing.
In the case of an isolated two-level atom, the most important damping mechanism is a spontaneous
radiative decay. This mechanism is associated with the coupling of the atom to the "zero point
electromagnetic fields".
Vacuum Cohesion Vehicle

Ram Implosion Wing

Wingspan 6'6" cord 3'6" 100-lbs. under went testing mounted to the back of a V-8 Van GVW
5750-lbs. mileage was calculated based on a single gallon of gas in back to back test runs, pilot 195lbs. Resulted in an increases of mileage 2-3-times beyond normal expectancies, however in an
independent test run Aug. 13-th 2003 a Dodge Caravan with a V-6 motor weighing in at GVW 2726
lb.. The driver weighs in at 295 lb. and the copilot 195 lb..
After topping off the tank we drove out 10.1 miles and back the same 10.1 miles for a total of 20.2
miles round trip, at 65-mph with the ac unit on. When we arrived back at the fueling station we
were amazed to find that we could only squeeze 0.2 tenths of a gallon back into the tank, we even
picked the hose up and tried to pour the extra gas from the line into the tank but it all ran back out
onto the ground.
20.2 miles @ 0.2 tenths of a gallon = 101-mpg!
A second trip consisted of a 59 mile round trip but this time we were only able to squeeze 0.1 tenths
of a gallon back into the tank.
59 miles @ 0.1 tenths of a gallon = 590-mpg!

109

How You Can Help

This web site, and the company now being formed, QEG-Solutions, was the result of a multi-fold
discover and the development of a unique reverse engineering program - "can someone bring the
Gravitics Enigma to light?" I've come pretty darn close! So how can You, the average person
reading this site, in fact help bring this technology to the world?
Allow me to explain:
1.) The simple fact is this: Quantum Electro-Gravitic Solutions is a fledgling R&D Company.
2.) QEG-Solutions has been funded for the most part by private investment money and personal
funds.
3.) It costs a considerable amount of money to sustain this research even more to bring this
technology to the commercial markets.
4.) This is where you the average reader may help by lending your, Engineering-skills, Electronicequipment, Grant Proposal Skills or Investment dollars, donations, or just showing your support, can
make a big difference in how quickly we are able to offer this technology to the public.
This really is a project that requires funding, but in the meantime I could use some test equipment,
for instance an Ion detector $80 dollars, and there are some other High Voltage parts I could use
that cost $150 dollars, so that I can build power souses to temporally replace the free energy ZPE
converter that is not yet working, due primarily to the need to rebuild the transformer and the
waveguide, new $20-30-thousand dollars, surplus a few thousand dollars...
QEG-Solutions has a suitable, environmentally friendly new means of generating Electrical Power,
Gravitic Propulsion, and Fuel Saving Devices, however, until at which time funding is found, we
face a very uncertain future. Our environment will, at some point, no longer support our disregard
for the planet.
Please consider joining myself and others in a team effort on this incredible journey...

Subscribe to:

gravitic_solutions

Group home page:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/gravitic_solutions

Thank You
Robert A. Patterson
Copyright 2004 Robert A. Patterson All Rights Reserved

110

111

VOGLIO INIZIARE CON UNA TRATTAZIONE DI UN CERTO JOSEPH

MISIOLEK...PREMETTO CHE STO' CERCANDO DI CONTATTARLO PER DEI
CHIARIMENTI E PER CONOSCERLO MEGLIO, HO AVUTO QUESTO
MATERIALE ATTRAVERSO ALTRE FONTI, IL SUO SITO (quello che suppongo sia
il suo sito!) E' SCRITTO IN UNA LINGUA CHE NON CONOSCO...CECO
PRESUPPONGO, IL SITO E' PIENO DI TEORIE E DENOTA UNA CERTA
CONOSCENZA DELLA MATERIA. NON SO SE LUI E' UNO SCIENZIATO O
COSA...PERO' IN MOLTI ALTRI DOCUMENTI (di altri ricercatori) HO VISTO DEI
PUNTI FONDAMENTALI IN COMUNE E INOLTRE LA SUA TRATTAZIONE MI
SEMBRA COERENTE CON ALTRE TEORIE FAMOSE COME QUELLA
DELL'IPERSPAZIO.
DURANTE LA TRATTAZIONE NOTERETE DELLE NOTE IN ROSSO...QUELLI
SONO I MIEI COMMENTI, DUBBI, CONFERME...SPERO CHE QUALCUNO DI VOI
POSSA CONTRIBUIRE NELLA RICERCA!
INIZIAMO SUBITO CON:
LA MANIPOLAZIONE DELLO SPAZIO-TEMPO.
di Joseph Misiolek
Iniziamo con alcuni principi base sulla realt fisica che sono importanti per capire come
manipolare lo spazio-tempo.
I scienziati ortodossi non sono capaci di arrivare a certe metodologie perch la loro
educazione una versione limitata di una pi estesa teoria dove questi fenomeni sono
possibili. Questo il motivo per cui potreste non riconoscere alcuni di questi principi
sulla base della fisica scolastica.
Ma se leggete attentamente noterete che la trattazione coerente e riuscirete a
capirla...user un linguaggio semplice, senza equazioni matematiche o termini troppo
tecnici in modo che tutti possano usufruirne.
Il concetto che "tutto vibrazione" scientificamente valido, la materia fatta di onde
elettromagnetiche che non sono altro che un tipo di vibrazione che trasmette energia.
Queste onde esistono in una matrice a cinque dimensioni di etere che il "media"
attraverso cui si propagano...questa matrice costituita da sei dimensioni parallele che
insieme danno origine a quella che noi definiamo "realt" con tutti i suoi fenomeni ed
effetti.
La chiave per ottenere cose come l'invisibilit della materia, il teltrasporto, l'antigravit, o
modificare lo scorrere del tempo, sta nel provocare "vibrazioni" in una di queste
dimensioni. Nello spazio 3D (il nostro spazio a tre dimensioni) si pu muovere la materia
avanti e indietro, destra e sinistra, sopra e sotto con alcuni interessanti risultati, ma la
realt composta da pi di tre dimensioni, e creando un campo elettrico o magnetico che
avvolge la materia e la fa vibrare in altre dimensioni ci permette di alterare le
caratteristiche stesse della materia. Alterazioni che dipendono da quale dimensione si v a
utilizzare.
Gli scienziati ortodossi lavorano con un sistema a tre dimensioni e sono capaci di
produrre la tecnologia limitata che vediamo tutti i giorni intorno a noi.
La creazione di questi campi iperdimensionali possibile grazie a bobine dalla speciale
geometria.

112

Questa una tabella che riassume le tecniche che stiamo per discutere in questa
trattazione:
Direzione della frequenza
applicata
terza dimensione

quarta dimensione

quinta dimensione

sesta dimensione

Metodo
campi magnetici ed elettrici
incrociati producono un campo
gravitazionale rotante accoppiato
alla luce
bobine in configurazione x-y-z
creano un campo
quadridimensionale accoppiato
all'oggetto
campo gravitazionale solitono
modulato da flusso magnetico
devia il flusso di etere attorno
all'oggetto
bobina caduceus produce un
campo scalare

Effetto ottenuto

invisibilit

teletrasporto

antigravit
viaggio nel tempo e distorsione
temporale

INVISIBILITA'
Affinch un oggetto diventi invisibile, la luce deve passargli attraverso o piegarsi attorno
ad esso. Noi analizzeremo un metodo per piegare la luce attorno ad un oggetto...la luce
potrebbe passare attraverso un oggetto se questo viene portato via da questa dimensione
ma questo non il caso che tratteremo qui.
La luce non si piega o devia a causa di un campo elettrico o magnetico perch i fotoni non
hanno una carica elettrica. Comunque ben noto che la gravit piega o devia la luce.
Affinch la gravit riesca a piegare significativamente la luce serve un campo
gravitazionale molto intenso come quello creato dalla massa di una stella o meglio ancora
di un buco nero. Ovviamente ricreare un campo gravitazionale cos intenso in laboratorio
impossibile e sarebbe anche disastroso.
La luce non si piega significativamente in un campo gravitazionale debole perch tale
campo non fortemente accoppiato all'oggetto stesso che genera il campo.
Per spiegare questo necessario un esempio:
pensate ad un cantante lirico e ad un calice di cristallo...finch il cantante non emette la
giusta frequenza non ci sar un adeguato trasferimento di energia tra le onde sonore e il
calice affinch si rompa. Non questione di potenza bruta ma di indovinare la giusta
frequenza di risonanza.
Allo stesso modo, la gravit di un pianeta statica se paragonata alla luce. Affinch l'una
influenzi l'altra deve essere raggiunta la condizione di risonanza. Se si modula o si fa
vibrare la gravit alla giusta frequenza, la luce si piega seguendo le linee di forza del
campo...pi ci si avvicina alla frequenza di risonanza e minore sar la potenza richiesta.
Ora la domanda :
come si pu modulare la gravit?

113

Quando un campo elettrico e uno magnetico si incrociano o intersecano con la giusta

angolazione viene prodotta la gravit in un direzione perpendicolare ad entrambi. Questo
illustrato nella figura 1 con uno schema vettoriale.

In accordo con quanto detto, modulando il campo elettrico o quello magnetico, si otterr
un campo gravitazionale vibrante alla stessa frequenza. Fare questo semplice se si usa
una corrente alternata per elettrificare un oggetto o energizzare una bobina.
Ad ogni modo, un dispositivo che piega la luce attorno ad un oggetto necessita di un
campo gravitazionale rotante, in modo che la luce che arriva verso di esso incontra questo
campo, si piega su di esso e lo segue per poi proseguire il suo cammino.
Esaminiamo un esempio calzante con il nostro caso:
Prendiamo il caso di un oggetto sferico carico (elettricamente) immerso in un campo
magnetico come quello illustrato nella figura 2.

Se si traccia il vettore gravit, sapendo che esso perpendicolare al campo magnetico ed

elettrico, si trover che esso ruota attorno all'oggetto come un vortice. Per modulare

114

questo campo, meglio alternare la componente elettrica usando un tesla coil, grazie al
fatto che la sua alta tensione e alta frequenza garantiscono una certa intensit di campo
attorno all'oggetto.
L'alta frequenza tende inoltre a far rimanere il campo sulla superficie dell'oggetto grazie
all'effetto "pelle".
Il campo magnetico pu essere prodotto da una Helmholtz coil, o anche una singola spira
o meglio ancora una serie di spire.
Una raffigurazione molto schematica quella della figura 3-4...per la helmholtz coil
cliccate qui.

Prendiamo ad esaminare cosa accade quando un fotone entra in un campo gravitazionale

modulato in questo modo.
Il fotone entra nel campo e viene immediatamente trasportato via lateralmente dal vettore
gravit rotante, spedendolo attorno all'oggetto. A causa della conservazione del momento,
questo fotone dovr seguire il campo finch non ritorna allo stesso medesimo tragitto di
quando era stato deviato...il fotone uscir dal campo con una traiettoria perfettamente in
asse con quella di entrata.
Dal punto di vista di un osservatore esterno il fotone non ha mai cambiato traiettoria e
quindi nessun oggetto ha bloccato la sua traiettoria...l'oggetto invisibile. Questo
meccanismo illustrato in figura 5.

115

ANTIGRAVITA'.
Per capire l'antigravit bisogna capire la gravit. La gravit una forza di spinta non una
trazione. Essa non altro che l'effetto di trascinamento dell'etere risucchiato dalla massa
di un oggetto. (Ho spiegato questo nella sezione sul campo del punto zero e l'energia del
punto zero.)
Il trucco sta nel canalizzare questo flusso di etere (questo etere non altro che il campo
del punto zero) attorno all'oggetto in modo che l'oggetto stesso non ne risente della sua
azione di trascinamento.
Per fare questo serve un vortice solitono. Un solitono ha l'abilit unica di viaggiare
efficientemente attraverso un fluido perch canalizza il flusso attorno ad esso.
Avete presente le ciambelline di fumo che si divertono a fare i fumatori? Se ci fate caso
queste "ciambelline" riescono a viaggiare nell'aria per un periodo relativamente lungo
considerando la debolissima spinta che viene loro impressa dal fumatore.
Queste ciambelline canalizzano l'aria attorno a loro stesse perch si comportano come se
fossero un insieme di ruote messe in un cilindro che viene poi piegato fino a formare una
ciambella.
In poche parole sono come tante rotelle messe secondo uno schema toroidale.
Esse rotolano attraverso l'aria (o qualsiasi altro fluido) con una resistenza molto bassa
proprio come una ruota rotola sul terreno.
Queste "ciambelline" di fumo sono un solitono. A ben vedere Homer Simpson ha ragione
a nominare sempre queste ciambelle!
Per produrre un solitono capace di canalizzare l'etere attorno ad esso (vedi fig 6), bisogna
iniziare con un dipolo magnetico.
Un dipolo magnetico un campo a forma di mela dove il flusso magnetico esce verso
l'alto per poi ridiscendere.

116

Questo tipo di campo pu essere visto nelle immagini raffiguranti barre magnetiche vicine
a limatura di ferro per evidenziare le linee di forza del campo magnetico. Altro esempio
quello del campo geomagnetico del nostro pianeta che genera le cosiddette fasce di Van
Allen. Anche una semplice spira di filo elettrico alimentata da una sorgente pu generare
un dipolo magnetico.
Questo dipolo gi un solitono costituito da un flusso magnetico.

Per accoppiare il dipolo con il flusso terrestre di etere, questo campo magnetico deve
essere modulato nella stessa direzione da un campo gravitazionale oscillante. Questo tipo
di campo gravitazionale oscillante gi stato discusso nel precedente caso
dell'invisibilit, solo questione di riprendere tale caso e alterarlo per produrre un
solitono invece di un semplice vortice come quello visto in figura 3.
Se il vortice viene stirato e piegato in un circolo former un toroide...un solitono. E' solo
un piccolo esercizio mentale di topologia!
Per replicare questo in termini di campi elettrici e magnetici, si parte con un anello
conduttore, tipo una spira di filo come quella usata per l'esempio del dipolo magnetico.
Ovviamente un vero e proprio avvolgimento toroidale migliore perch produce un
campo magnetico pi intenso.
Attorno alla lunghezza di questo anello (o toroide se si optato per un toroide) bisogna
avvolgere un'altra bobina coassialmente. Entrambi gli avvolgimenti (toroide e bobina
esterna) vanno alimentati con corrente alternata (nell'immagine viene indicata corrente
continua il che necessita di una modulazione esterna) per generare il campo megnetico,
poi entrambe le bobine vengono collegate agli elettrodi opposti di un generatore ad alta

117

tensione per creare il campo elettrico.

Tutto questo illustrato nella figura 7.

Questo sistema scherma ogni oggetto posto dentro l'anello dal campo gravitazionale
terrestre se il flusso di etere sufficientemente deviato. Se il campo del dipolo molto
intenso, il flusso di etere verr deviato con pi forza e l'intero anello sar spinto in alto.
Questo anello pu semplicemente schermare la gravit, ma anche generare propulsione.
Qui ho fornito soltanto lo schema concettuale...per un progetto pi specifico andare nella
sezione "sperimentare l'antigravit".

IL TELETRASPORTO.
Il teletrasporto la rimozione di un oggetto dallo spazio tridimensionale, attraverso una
scorciatoia nella quarta dimensione, per poi reinserire l'oggetto nello spazio
tridimensionale ma in una differente posizione.
Nella quarta dimensione lo spazio pu essere piegato con facilit in modo da portare il
punto di destinazione vicino all'oggetto o viceversa il punto in cui si trova l'oggetto viene
distorto fino ad arrivare al punto di destinazione.
Piegare lo spazio nelle tre dimensioni richiede quantitativi di energia e campi
gravitazionali enormi, ma nella quarta dimensione uno scherzo!
Per ora ci interesseremo solamente di come agganciare un oggetto e portarlo nella quarta
dimensione.
Nella fisica ordinaria esiste un operatore matematico chiamato "operatore trasversale"
(non so se ho tradotto bene il termine, quello originale cross product... una specie di
calcolo tensoriale, simile per certi versi alla regola del parallelogrammo).
Quando due vettori (la freccia indica il verso e l'intensit del campo) sono incrociati uno
con l'altro, un terzo vettore appare che ha un certo angolo rispetto agli altri due. Come gi
detto un vettore gravit proporzionale al prodotto trasversale di un vettore magnetico e

118

uno elettrico.
Comunque quando si incrociano tre vettori, alle giuste angolazioni, viene prodotto un
quarto vettore perpendicolare a tutti gli altri tre...dove punter tale vettore? Nella quarta
dimensione.
Questo un concetto che appartiene molto alla teoria dell'iperspazio...leggete il libro
Iperspazio di Mikio Kaku per capire meglio questi concetti. Comunque intendo fare una
bella trattazione sulla teoria dell'iperspazio nella sezione "astronomia e cosmologia".
Una configurazione X-Y-Z di tre bobine toroidali svolge bene questo lavoro, tale
configurazione illustrata nella figura 8.

Ognuna delle tre bobine produce un dipolo magnetico il cui campo al centro
perpendicolare agli altri due campi delle altre due bobine. A questo punto c' un flusso
magnetico a quattro dimensioni, o iperflusso, che concentrato maggiormente al
centro...ora solo questione di accoppiare tale iperflusso con l'oggetto posto al centro dei
tre toroidi per mandarlo nella quarta dimensione.
Il solo iperflusso non per sufficiente a far questo. Noi siamo agganciati allo spazio
tridimensionale da una forza elastica che pu essere sconfitta solo in due modi: o
pompando un quantitativo enorme di energia nelle bobine o facendo pulsare le bobine alla
frequenza di risonanza della quarta dimensione.
Pensate allo spazio come a un foglio di gomma, per deviare un punto del foglio sopra o
sotto (cio sul piano verticale z) potreste spingere sul foglio e mantenerlo stirato con una
certa spesa di energia, oppure potreste far vibrare il foglio in modo che i punti su di esso
si muovano sopra e sotto.
Se si indovina il mix giusto di frequenze si pu creare una onda stazionaria sul foglio, che
corrisponde all'energia minima usata per ottenere la massima deformazione del foglio
stesso. Si ritorna sempre al concetto di risonanza.
La frequenza di risonanza dello spazio situata pi o meno nella frequenza superiore
delle onde radio fino alle microonde.
Quando queste frequenze sono pompate nelle tre bobine, questo genera non solo campi
magnetici vibranti ma anche campi elettrici. Questo dovuto a un principio fisico delle

119

leggi di Maxwell, che asserisce che campi magnetici in movimento producono campi
elettrici.
Il vantaggio qui sta nel fatto che questo campo elettrico indotto insieme all'oggetto ad
essere teletrasportato, accoppiando automaticamente l'oggetto all'iperflusso vibrante.
Ritornando all'esempio del foglio di gomma, se l'onda stazionaria nel foglio ha
un'ampiezza sufficiente, questa onda strapper un pezzo del foglio e diventer un pallone
di gomma a se stante rispetto al foglio.
Se si mappa il campo magnetico di tre bobine a schema X-Y-Z, esso sembra una ipersfera
spiegata.
Se la frequenza di risonanza raggiunta questo campo collassa in una ipersfera
magnetica, portando tutti gli oggetti in prossimit fuori nell'iperspazio.
L'oggetto teletrasportato incapsulato in una bolla di spazio fluttuante nella quarta
dimensione, e sar completamente disconnessa dalla realt tridimensionale.
Pu essere difficile raggiungere questa frequenza di risonanza, cos pu essere meglio
iniziare con un semplice arrangiamento di bobine X-Y-Z per produrre un campo
magnetico rotante che verr poi modulato dal rumore bianco.
Questa rotazione pu essere ottenuta facendo pulsare ogni bobina ma con uno sfasamento
fra le tre. In questo modo il prodotto trasversale di ogni vettore magnetico non punta
sempre nella stessa direzione. Lo scopo principale di questa rotazione di indurre campi
elettrici nell'oggetto senza preoccuparsi della modulazione alla frequenza di risonanza
dello spazio. Questa modulazione compito di una quarta bobina.
In questo modo si ottiene anche una certa invisibilit dell'oggetto e i raggi di luce
vengono piegati via.
Questo campo rotante viene poi modulato da una quarta bobina alimentata con rumore
bianco.
Il rumore bianco consiste di tutte le possibili frequenze di uno spettro con un certo range,
se questo rumore bianco ha un range fra le onde radio e le microonde allora la frequenza
di risonanza pu essere garantita.
Questo un metodo per aprirsi una strada nell'iperspazio.
MANIPOLARE IL TEMPO.
Il viaggio nel tempo un processo molto simile a quello del teletrasporto. Entrambi
includono il fatto di viaggiare attraverso lo spazio-tempo senza seguire un percorso
tridimensionale. L'unica differenza sta nella direzione verso cui applicata la frequenza.
Nel teletrasporto la direzione perpendicolare alla terza dimensione spaziale, qui invece
la direzione di applicazione verso la sesta dimensione.
La sesta dimensione quella che separa gli universi paralleli, un p come la prima
dimensione (destra e sinistra) separa due binari paralleli. Applicando la frequenza corretta
nella dimensione corretta, si permette ad un oggetto di liberarsi dallo spazio a cinque
dimensioni (che appartiene alla nostra linea temporale) e agganciarsi ad un'altra linea
temporale.
La produzione di un campo capace di risuonare nella sesta dimensione implica la
comprensione di una teoria particolare dell'iperspazio. Detto semplicemente...tutte le onde
elettromagnetiche hanno delle componenti nelle dimensioni superiori (la parte
immaginaria dell'onda) a cui si pu accedere cancellando la componente tridimensionale

120

che noi percepiamo.

In pratica necessario mettere in "coniugazione di fase" ogni campo elettrico, magnetico
e quindi elettromagnetico dell'onda.
Coniugazione di fase non altro che un termine che indica il processo di aggiungere un
campo o un'onda alla sua immagine speculare cos che si cancellano a vicenda.
Lo si comprende meglio se si spiega la natura delle onde.
Le onde consistono in energia oscillante fra stati immaginari e reali. In altre parole, in un
momento l'energia reale e visibile come un movimento nel media in cui viaggia, e in un
momento successivo l'energia immaginaria o energia potenziale immagazzinata nello
stress del media.
Per esempio in una stringa vibrante la componente reale visibile dalle vibrazioni della
stringa stessa, mentre la componente immaginaria evidente nei picchi di ampiezza della
stringa dove tutta l'energia immagazzinata nel tessuto della stringa stirata.
In questo esempio, lo stiramento viaggia nella direzione della stringa (longitudinale)
mentre la direzione della vibrazione, il movimento fisico attuale di un punto della stringa,
perpendicolare cio trasverso.
Nel caso di un pendolo, l'energia commuta tra quella cinetica al centro di esso quando il
pendolo raggiunge la massima velocit, a quella potenziale, quando l'energia
immagazzinata nel campo gravitazionale al punto pi alto del pendolo.
Proprio come l'energia potenziale (parte immaginaria) di una stringa perpendicolare a
quella cinetica (parte reale), cos in questo esempio l'energia potenziale gravitazionale
perpendicolare a quella cinetica. La sola differenza che nel caso della stringa, l'energia
potenziale una dimensione inferiore di quella cinetica, e nel pendolo una dimensione
superiore.
Per le onde elettromagnetiche, la componente immaginaria punta nella quinta dimensione
( vero l'ho letto anche in Iperspazio, capitolo 4 "il segreto della luce: vibrazioni nella
quinta dimensione).
Nella coniugazione di fase viene cancellata la componente reale, lasciando l'energia
manifestarsi solo nella componente immaginaria. Ad ogni modo questa onda in
coniugazione di fase deve oscillare in qualche modo. L'energia non distrutta...solamente
trasformata o diretta in un'altra direzione.
Siccome non pu oscillare pi fra il reale (spazio tridimensionale) e l'immaginario (quinta
dimensione), perch il reale stato eliminato essa deve oscillare fra l'immaginario e
qualcosa di superiore.
Siccome la componente immaginaria vibra nella quinta dimensione, questo qualcosa di
superiore deve essere per forza la sesta dimensione.
Da un punto di vista tridimensionale, tutto quello che vedr un osservatore esterno sar un
campo scalare dove il valore del campo lo stesso ovunque ma rimbalza su e gi di valore
nel tempo.
Questo "rimbalzamento" nel tempo e non nello spazio l'evidenza visibile che la
modulazione diretta nella sesta dimensione sta avendo luogo...e la sesta dimensione il
tempo.
Einstein disse che la quarta dimensione il tempo, ma ci sono almeno due dimensioni
fisiche extra che servono a spiegare alcuni fenomeni fisici che non stiamo qui a spiegare.
Uno scopo gi stato in parte spiegato ed l'esistenza della parte immaginaria delle onde

121

EM...per vi consiglio caldamente la lettura di Iperspazio di Mikio Kaku...rende tutto pi

facile da capire.
La configurazione della bobina necessaria per produrre questi campi scalari la caduceus
coil illustrata nella figura 9. E trattata anche nella sezione sperimentale di questo sito,
nonch oggetto di sperimentazione nel forum.

E' un pezzo di filo avvolto ad elica che crea una contro-rotazione delle correnti e che
quindi fa opporre i campi magnetici.
Quando la si alimenta con un segnale alternato, l'incrocio fra gli avvolgimenti consente ai
campi generati di cancellarsi in coniugazione di fase ed essere trasformati in campi
scalari.
Per accoppiare questo campo scalare all'oggetto si dovrebbe caricarlo con un generatore
ad alta tensione in continua come un Van De Graaf o un generatore AT in alternata come
un tesla coil...se si ha il coraggio. Perch cosa dovrebbe succedere?

CONCLUSIONE.
In questa trattazione non sono stati date specifiche di costruzione, ma abbiamo enunciato i
principi che devono essere compresi per poter passare alla sperimentazione.
Semplicemente, pensate in termini di flusso di etere, accoppiamento in risonanza, campi
scalari, poi si passa ad utilizzare l'appropriata configurazione delle bobine per raggiungere
questi risultati.
Se andate alla sezione "sperimentare l'antigravit" di questo sito ho gi messo uno schema
della caduceus e un progetto di anello antigravitazionale sempre di Misiolek con tutte le
specifiche. In pi avete l'ausilio del forum che vi permetter di scambiarvi suggerimenti
ed esperienze con chi come voi tenta di realizzare tutto ci.
Siete avvisati che queste tecniche sconfinano nel regno dell'ignoto (apposta mi
piacciono!) e che la coscienza pu essere alterata dalla dislocazione spazio-temporale,
proprio come successo ai marinai del Philadelphia Experiment.
La vita risiede non solo in queste dimensioni ma si diffonde attraverso il tempo, le
dimensioni e altri livelli di percezione...giocare con i campi scalari, specialmente nella

122

forma di laser in coniugazione di fase modulati da segnali audio, ha il potenziale di aprire

portali, consentendo a forze malevoli di entrare in questa realt e danneggiare lo
sperimentatore.
Wow! Mi ricorda Doom! Preparer una bella doppietta a pallettoni...nel caso ce ne fosse
bisogno. Anche qualche carica di Semtex non guasta mai!
E' un dato di fatto che l'invisibilit, il viaggio nel tempo, teletrasporto e antigravit sono
tecniche esistenti e realizzate segretamente. Ci sono testimoni, documenti governativi ed
evidenze fisiche che lo dimostrano...la questione semmai come riprodurre queste
tecniche.
Ok il documento finisce qui...cosa state aspettando? Andate nella vostra cantina e iniziate
la sperimentazione!
Io ho iniziato da poco...tante menti messe insieme possono accelerare la ricerca! Vi
aspetto nel forum per discutere di tutto questo e sentire le vostre esperienze!

123

HOME |NEWS |EXPLORE BY SUBJECT |LAST WORD |SUBSCRIBE |SEARCH |ARCHIVE

|RSS |JOBS

Take a leap into hyperspace

05 January 2006

From New Scientist Print Edition

Haiko Lietz

EVERY year, the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics awards prizes for the best papers
presented at its annual conference. Last year's winner in the nuclear and future flight category went to a
paper calling for experimental tests of an astonishing new type of engine. According to the paper, this
hyperdrive motor would propel a craft through another dimension at enormous speeds. It could leave
Earth at lunchtime and get to the moon in time for dinner. There's just one catch: the idea relies on an
obscure and largely unrecognised kind of physics. Can they possibly be serious?
The AIAA is certainly not embarrassed. What's more, the US military has begun to cast its eyes over the
hyperdrive concept, and a space propulsion researcher at the US Department of Energy's Sandia National
Laboratories has said he would be interested in putting the idea to the test. And despite the bafflement of
most physicists at the theory that supposedly underpins it, Pavlos Mikellides, an aerospace engineer at the
Arizona State University in Tempe who reviewed the winning paper, stands by the committee's choice.
"Even though such features have been explored before, this particular approach is quite unique," he says.
Unique it certainly is. If the experiment gets the go-ahead and works, it could reveal new interactions
between the fundamental forces of nature that would change the future of space travel. Forget spending
six months or more holed up in a rocket on the way to Mars, a round trip on the hyperdrive could take as
little as 5 hours. All our worries about astronauts' muscles wasting away or their DNA being irreparably
damaged by cosmic radiation would disappear overnight. What's more the device would put travel to the
stars within reach for the first time. But can the hyperdrive really get off the ground?
The answer to that question hinges on the work of a little-known German physicist. Burkhard Heim began
to explore the hyperdrive propulsion concept in the 1950s as a spin-off from his attempts to heal the
biggest divide in physics: the rift between quantum mechanics and Einstein's general theory of relativity.
Quantum theory describes the realm of the very small - atoms, electrons and elementary particles - while
general relativity deals with gravity. The two theories are immensely successful in their separate spheres.
The clash arises when it comes to describing the basic structure of space. In general relativity, space-time
is an active, malleable fabric. It has four dimensions - three of space and one of time - that deform when
masses are placed in them. In Einstein's formulation, the force of gravity is a result of the deformation of
these dimensions. Quantum theory, on the other hand, demands that space is a fixed and passive stage,
something simply there for particles to exist on. It also suggests that space itself must somehow be made
up of discrete, quantum elements.
In the early 1950s, Heim began to rewrite the equations of general relativity in a quantum framework. He
drew on Einstein's idea that the gravitational force emerges from the dimensions of space and time, but
suggested that all fundamental forces, including electromagnetism, might emerge from a new, different
set of dimensions. Originally he had four extra dimensions, but he discarded two of them believing that
they did not produce any forces, and settled for adding a new two-dimensional "sub-space" onto Einstein's
four-dimensional space-time.
In Heim's six-dimensional world, the forces of gravity and electromagnetism are coupled together. Even
in our familiar four-dimensional world, we can see a link between the two forces through the behaviour of
fundamental particles such as the electron. An electron has both mass and charge. When an electron falls
under the pull of gravity its moving electric charge creates a magnetic field. And if you use an

124

electromagnetic field to accelerate an electron you move the gravitational field associated with its mass.
But in the four dimensions we know, you cannot change the strength of gravity simply by cranking up the
electromagnetic field.
In Heim's view of space and time, this limitation disappears. He claimed it is possible to convert
electromagnetic energy into gravitational and back again, and speculated that a rotating magnetic field
could reduce the influence of gravity on a spacecraft enough for it to take off.
When he presented his idea in public in 1957, he became an instant celebrity. Wernher von Braun, the
German engineer who at the time was leading the Saturn rocket programme that later launched astronauts
to the moon, approached Heim about his work and asked whether the expensive Saturn rockets were
worthwhile. And in a letter in 1964, the German relativity theorist Pascual Jordan, who had worked with
the distinguished physicists Max Born and Werner Heisenberg and was a member of the Nobel
committee, told Heim that his plan was so important "that its successful experimental treatment would
without doubt make the researcher a candidate for the Nobel prize".
But all this attention only led Heim to retreat from the public eye. This was partly because of his severe
multiple disabilities, caused by a lab accident when he was still in his teens. But Heim was also reluctant
to disclose his theory without an experiment to prove it. He never learned English because he did not want
his work to leave the country. As a result, very few people knew about his work and no one came up with
the necessary research funding. In 1958 the aerospace company Blkow did offer some money, but not
enough to do the proposed experiment.
While Heim waited for more money to come in, the company's director, Ludwig Blkow, encouraged him
to develop his theory further. Heim took his advice, and one of the results was a theorem that led to a
series of formulae for calculating the masses of the fundamental particles - something conventional
theories have conspicuously failed to achieve. He outlined this work in 1977 in the Max Planck Institute's
journal Zeitschrift fr Naturforschung, his only peer-reviewed paper. In an abstruse way that few
physicists even claim to understand, the formulae work out a particle's mass starting from physical
characteristics, such as its charge and angular momentum.
Yet the theorem has proved surprisingly powerful. The standard model of physics, which is generally
accepted as the best available theory of elementary particles, is incapable of predicting a particle's mass.
Even the accepted means of estimating mass theoretically, known as lattice quantum chromodynamics,
only gets to between 1 and 10 per cent of the experimental values.
Gravity reduction

But in 1982, when researchers at the German Electron Synchrotron (DESY) in Hamburg implemented
Heim's mass theorem in a computer program, it predicted masses of fundamental particles that matched
the measured values to within the accuracy of experimental error. If they are let down by anything, it is the
precision to which we know the values of the fundamental constants. Two years after Heim's death in
2001, his long-term collaborator Illobrand von Ludwiger calculated the mass formula using a more
accurate gravitational constant. "The masses came out even more precise," he says.
After publishing the mass formulae, Heim never really looked at hyperspace propulsion again. Instead, in
response to requests for more information about the theory behind the mass predictions, he spent all his
time detailing his ideas in three books published in German. It was only in 1980, when the first of his
books came to the attention of a retired Austrian patent officer called Walter Drscher, that the
hyperspace propulsion idea came back to life. Drscher looked again at Heim's ideas and produced an
"extended" version, resurrecting the dimensions that Heim originally discarded. The result is "HeimDrscher space", a mathematical description of an eight-dimensional universe.
From this, Drscher claims, you can derive the four forces known in physics: the gravitational and
electromagnetic forces, and the strong and weak nuclear forces. But there's more to it than that. "If Heim's
picture is to make sense," Drscher says, "we are forced to postulate two more fundamental forces." These
are, Drscher claims, related to the familiar gravitational force: one is a repulsive anti-gravity similar to

125

the dark energy that appears to be causing the universe's expansion to accelerate. And the other might be
used to accelerate a spacecraft without any rocket fuel.
This force is a result of the interaction of Heim's fifth and sixth dimensions and the extra dimensions that
Drscher introduced. It produces pairs of "gravitophotons", particles that mediate the interconversion of
electromagnetic and gravitational energy. Drscher teamed up with Jochem Huser, a physicist and
professor of computer science at the University of Applied Sciences in Salzgitter, Germany, to turn the
theoretical framework into a proposal for an experimental test. The paper they produced, "Guidelines for a
space propulsion device based on Heim's quantum theory", is what won the AIAA's award last year.
Claims of the possibility of "gravity reduction" or "anti-gravity" induced by magnetic fields have been
investigated by NASA before (New Scientist, 12 January 2002, p 24). But this one, Drscher insists, is
different. "Our theory is not about anti-gravity. It's about completely new fields with new properties," he
says. And he and Huser have suggested an experiment to prove it.
This will require a huge rotating ring placed above a superconducting coil to create an intense magnetic
field. With a large enough current in the coil, and a large enough magnetic field, Drscher claims the
electromagnetic force can reduce the gravitational pull on the ring to the point where it floats free.
Drscher and Huser say that to completely counter Earth's pull on a 150-tonne spacecraft a magnetic
field of around 25 tesla would be needed. While that's 500,000 times the strength of Earth's magnetic
field, pulsed magnets briefly reach field strengths up to 80 tesla. And Drscher and Huser go further.
With a faster-spinning ring and an even stronger magnetic field, gravitophotons would interact with
conventional gravity to produce a repulsive anti-gravity force, they suggest.
Drscher is hazy about the details, but he suggests that a spacecraft fitted with a coil and ring could be
propelled into a multidimensional hyperspace. Here the constants of nature could be different, and even
the speed of light could be several times faster than we experience. If this happens, it would be possible to
reach Mars in less than 3 hours and a star 11 light years away in only 80 days, Drscher and Huser say.
So is this all fanciful nonsense, or a revolution in the making? The majority of physicists have never heard
of Heim theory, and most of those contacted by New Scientist said they couldn't make sense of Drscher
and Huser's description of the theory behind their proposed experiment. Following Heim theory is hard
work even without Drscher's extension, says Markus Pssel, a theoretical physicist at the Max Planck
Institute for Gravitational Physics in Potsdam, Germany. Several years ago, while an undergraduate at the
University of Hamburg, he took a careful look at Heim theory. He says he finds it "largely
incomprehensible", and difficult to tie in with today's physics. "What is needed is a step-by-step
introduction, beginning at modern physical concepts," he says.
The general consensus seems to be that Drscher and Huser's theory is incomplete at best, and certainly
extremely difficult to follow. And it has not passed any normal form of peer review, a fact that surprised
the AIAA prize reviewers when they made their decision. "It seemed to be quite developed and ready for
such publication," Mikellides told New Scientist.
At the moment, the main reason for taking the proposal seriously must be Heim theory's uncannily
successful prediction of particle masses. Maybe, just maybe, Heim theory really does have something to
contribute to modern physics. "As far as I understand it, Heim theory is ingenious," says Hans Theodor
Auerbach, a theoretical physicist at the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in Zurich who worked with
Heim. "I think that physics will take this direction in the future."
It may be a long while before we find out if he's right. In its present design, Drscher and Huser's
experiment requires a magnetic coil several metres in diameter capable of sustaining an enormous current
density. Most engineers say that this is not feasible with existing materials and technology, but Roger
Lenard, a space propulsion researcher at Sandia National Laboratories in New Mexico thinks it might just
be possible. Sandia runs an X-ray generator known as the Z machine which "could probably generate the
necessary field intensities and gradients".
For now, though, Lenard considers the theory too shaky to justify the use of the Z machine. "I would be
very interested in getting Sandia interested if we could get a more perspicacious introduction to the

126

mathematics behind the proposed experiment," he says. "Even if the results are negative, that, in my mind,
is a successful experiment."
Who was Burkhard Heim?

Burkhard Heim had a remarkable life. Born in 1925 in Potsdam, Germany, he decided at the age of 6 that
he wanted to become a rocket scientist. He disguised his designs in code so that no one could discover his
secret. And in the cellar of his parents' house, he experimented with high explosives. But this was to lead
to disaster.
Towards the end of the second world war, he worked as an explosives developer, and an accident in 1944
in which a device exploded in his hands left him permanently disabled. He lost both his forearms, along
with 90 per cent of his hearing and eyesight.
After the war, he attended university in Gttingen to study physics. The idea of propelling a spacecraft
using quantum mechanics rather than rocket fuel led him to study general relativity and quantum
mechanics. It took an enormous effort. From 1948, his father and wife replaced his senses, spending hours
reading papers and transcribing his calculations onto paper. And he developed a photographic memory.
Supporters of Heim theory claim that it is a panacea for the troubles in modern physics. They say it unites
quantum mechanics and general relativity, can predict the masses of the building blocks of matter from
first principles, and can even explain the state of the universe 13.7 billion years ago.
Return to article
Printed on Fri Mar 24 17:57:29 GMT 2006

127

128

129

130

131

132

133

134

135

136

137

138

139

140

141

142

143

144

145

146

UFO Power
What could be more exotic than discovering the power source of those mischievous little "Visitors" that
have been plaguing our skies for untold millennia? In Jacques Vallee's book "Passage to Magonia" he
traces various stories, legends and myths back as far as recorded history goes and came to some
interesting conclusions. Not only were the current abduction stories similar to these but also the vehicles
described. One thing that stood out for me was his idea that this phenomenon seems to appear to the
human observer to be always something just beyond prevailing technological capabilities of the time. For
example, in the 1800's they were thought to be "airships" (blimps, dirigibles) and sure enough, shortly
thereafter, we had blimps. Later on we saw them as jet powered, then nuclear powered. Now we are
assuming inter-dimentional travel.
Another aspect of this is that, during reported encounters, the occupants of these vehicles are often
reported as speaking to their abductees either verbally or telepathically ( I'm not even going to go there).
During these conversations the abductees often ask how the ships are powered. In Response, the
occupants usually tell them something that again, relates to the technology of the time. Or soon to emerge
technology. I mention this because, in reading modern abduction reports, I have often seen water
mentioned as being a part of this power source.
I recall one abductees report as stating that the power unit featured two "tubes" of water which ringed
the ship. These tubes being side by side and rotating in opposite directions. Think about it for a minute.
What would happen in a setup like that?
Do we even know? What if the water in each tube was appositely ionized? What if a high energy charge
was put through the system?
I didn't mean to get stuck on electrolysis like this. I had hoped that the conversation would explore new
areas. It hasn't really so I thought I'd write this up as a new avenue. The focus is not supposed to be on
UFO's. It is intended to be in theorizing what such a setup would do. Maybe that isn't even their power
source at all. Maybe they (if they exist) are giving us periodic "hints". If so let's think about every possible
angle of the thing. What if you created a generator out of water filled tubing? What would be the result?
Would it behave EXACTLY like a metal conductor? Would some laws not apply and perhaps others be
discovered?