Professional Documents
Culture Documents
IJIACS
ISSN 2347 8616
Volume 4, Issue 6
June 2015
Sonal varshney
M.tech Scholar
Galgotias University
Abhinandan Singh
M.tech Scholar
Galgotias University
ABSTRACT
The Ad Hoc network in mobile communication is divided into two groups i.e. Vehicular ad hoc
network (VANET) & Mobile ad hoc network (MANET). The word ad hoc means for this purpose,
so in VANET ad hoc network is used for vehicle only. Vehicular Ad hoc Network (VANET) is a new
communication paradigm that enables the communication between vehicles moving at high speeds on
the roads. The main aim of our study was to identify which ad hoc routing method has better
performance in highly mobile environment of VANET. Routing protocols were selected carefully after
carrying out literature review. The selected protocols were then evaluated through simulation in terms
of performance metrics i.e. path optimality, packet delivery ratio and transmission ratio. After
simulation results, we used MATLAB to plot the graph to compare the results of selected routing
protocols with each other. Based on the results of performance metrics in different environments of
VANET, we realized that position based routing method of VANET outperformed the traditional ad
hoc topology based routing. The selection of a single routing protocol is hard in VANET because the
protocol performance depends on vehicle speed, driving environment etc. That may vary from one
environment of network to another.
KEYWORDS: VANET, Routing Protocols, Packet Delivery Ratio, Path Optimality, Transmission
Ratio
INTRODUCTION
Vehicular Ad hoc Network (VANET) is a kind of Mobile Ad hoc Network (MANET). It is a new
network technology where the cars are used as mobile nodes to form a communication network. The
growth of the increased number of vehicles are equipped with wireless transceivers to communicate
with other vehicles to form a special class of wireless networks, known as vehicular ad hoc networks
or VANETs. VANET is an integral part of the intelligence transportation system architecture, which
aims to improve road. A VANET turns every participating car into a wireless router or node, allowing
cars approximately 100 to 300 meters of each other to connect. VANET contains two entities: access
points and vehicles, the access points are fixed and usually connected to the internet and they could
participate as a distribution point for vehicles.
134
June 2015
Using vehicular communications, drivers can be well informed of vital traffic information such as
treacherous road conditions and accident sites by communicating amongst vehicles and/or with the
roadside infrastructure. With the large information of traffic conditions, vehicles will have better
knowledge and it is reasonable that the problem of road accidents can be alleviated. More than 60%
accidents happen due to the delay of less than a half second. We can avoid these types of problem by
introducing the VANET technology. It is also helpful for sharing documents, music and videos etc.
VANET ROUTING PROTOCOLS
Routing is the process of selecting paths in a network along which to send network traffic. A routing
protocol specifies how routers communicate with each other, disseminating information that enables
them to select routes between any two nodes on a computer network.
Various ad hoc routing protocols have been proposed in recent years, whereas two main classes
of VANET routing protocols can be distinguished: location-based and topology-based protocols.
These protocols enable the exchange of data between distinct pairs of nodes, using intermediate
network participants for forwarding packets on their way to the destination. Location-based routing
protocols use additional information on the nodes geographical positions to find suitable routes. These
positions may be e.g. the nodes GPS coordinates. However, when using location-based protocols,
there is always a need for location services and servers.
134
June 2015
C) Hybrid Position-based Routing: Hybrid routing is the position-based routing that reduces control
overhead/traffic and do not want to maintain the table since they make use of the location information
about the neighboring nodes and destination node which makes position-based routing more scalable.
There are various differences between topological based routing protocols and position based routing
protocols. Some differences are given below by using table-
Table 1- Differences Between Topology Based Routing Protocols And Position Based Routing
Protocols
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
The software used in this study is MATLAB. The advantage that MATLAB offers is that it is widely
available, continuously updated and has wider reach. Mobility and generation topologies for various
models are already available for MATLAB which can be made use of to save development time. As
the majority of tools available at present do not have the ease and widespread reach, using MATLAB
offers unique advantage over other systems.
June 2015
SIMULATION SETUP : In our simulation, the simulation area of 100 m 100 m is used. packet sizes
of 2000 kbits are used. Four routing protocols are examined; AODV, DSR, GPSR and GSR. Table 2
shows the input parameters that we have used in our simulation using matlab.
Simulation Parameters
Different performance metrics are used in the evaluation of routing protocols. They represent different
characteristics of the overall network performance. In this report, i evaluate three metrics used in our
comparisons to study their effect on the overall network performance. These metrics are Path
optimality, packet delivery ratio, transmission range.
Path optimality:
It defined as difference between the no of hops a packet took to reach its destination and the length of
shortest path that physically existed through the network when packet was originated.
Packet delivery ratio:
packet Delivery Ratio (PDR) is the ratio between the number of packets transmitted by a traffic source
and the number of packets received by a traffic sink.
Transmission ratio:
Transmission ratio is defined as ratio of fixed and variable transmission energy losses. The
transmission range that achieves the most economical use of energy is studied for uniformly
distributed vehicles nodes in VANET.
Volume 4, Issue 6
June 2015
Volume 4, Issue 6
June 2015
134
Sonal varshney, Abhinandan singh
June 2015
3) Akhtar Husain , Amit Doegar Performance Comparison Of Topology And Position Based
Routing Protocols In Vehicular Network Environments International Journal of Wireless &
Mobile Networks (IJWMN) Vol. 3, No. 4, August 2011.
4) Jacob Thomas, Farsana Basheer Study and Simulation of Vehicular Ad Hoc Network
Modules Using MATLAB International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Science and
Software Engineering Volume 4, Issue 5, pp. 1302-1308 May 2014.
5) J. Haerri, F. Filali, and C. Bonnet, (2006) Performance comparison of AODV and OLSR in
VANETs urban environments under realistic mobility patterns, 5 th annual IFIP
Mediterranean Ad Hoc Networking Workshop (Med-Hoc-Net 2006), Lipari, Italy.
6) C. Lochert, H. Hartenstein, and J. Tian, (2003) A Routing strategy for vehicular ad hoc
networks in city environments, Proceedings of IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium,
Columbus, USA, pp. 156-161.
7) Y. Ko, and N. Vaidya, (2002) Location Aided Routing in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks, ACM
journal of Wireless Networks, vol. 6, no. 4, pp 307-321.
134