Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Department of Chemistry
Sriwijaya University
Palembang 30662, Indonesia
2
Department of Chemical Engineering
Sriwijaya University
Palembang 30662, Indonesia
3
Department of Chemistry
Gadjah Mada University
Yogyakarta 55281, Indonesia
ABSTRACT
The total palm oil production has increased in the last few years, as a result, palm oil waste which
is a by-product of the milling process will also increase. The palm oil production process in mills
consists of several unit operations. The processing of fresh fruit bunches of palm results in the generation of different types of residue. Among the waste generated, palm oil mill effluent (POME) is
considered as the most harmful waste for the environment if discharged untreated. POME is a thick
brownish liquid that contains high solids, oil and grease. Several treatment technologies have been
used for POME treatment, since the direct discharge of POME adversely affects the environment.
Due to the presence of high oil residue in POME, attempts have been made to recover and convert
it into valuable products such as usefull chemicals and biofuel. Recovery process of oil residue from
POME is difficult and not economical; therefore, its alternative usage is explored. In a preliminary
study, we observed that it was possible to produce various types of liquid hydrocarbons fuel
(biofuel) from oil residue from POME. Oil residue from POME has been catalytically hyrdrocracked
to biofuel by Ni/Mo-ZrO2 pillared monmorillonite catalyst in fixed bed micro reactor. The data show
that the catalytic activity of ZrO2 pillared montmorillonite (ZM) is more active than parent
monmorillonite. While, catalyst Ni/Mo loaded on ZM can increase the catalytic activity for hydrocracking of oil residue from POME into biofuel. The products were mainly gases, biofuel and solid
coke. The biofuel products consist of gasoline, kerosene and diesel oil fraction.
.
INTRODUCTION
Palm oil industry has resulted sludge waste. Palm
oil mill effluent (POME) which contains a significant
amount of oil residue. Oil residues contained in the
palm oil sludge could be potentially processed as an
energy resource. The success of treating palm oil waste
sludge into fuel oil will be significant in resolving the
dependence of fuel oil from fossils and reducing
environmental burdens. Processing of oil residues from
POME into qualified fuel oil can be conducted through
two processes at once, that are process of cracking and
process of hydrogenation or hydrocracking. Hydrocracking oil residues in POME is conducted by
*Corresponding author
Email: ghasanudin@yahoo.co.id
396
The sludge waste (POME) based fatty acid mixture residue was obtained from PT. Sriwijaya Palm Oil
Indonesia-Palembang. It was received as dark brown
pasta, having mild smell, lighter than water and free of
water. The POME was extracted by a soxlet extractor
with gasoline solvent to find the fatty acid mixture. .
2. Catalyst Preparation and Characterization
Natural clay of monmorillonite type was precipitated and dried in oven. It was saturated by using
sodium chloride solution and swirled for 24 h.
Furthermore, the clay was washed by demineralized
water to clean the chloride ion of the clay. This product (Na-monmorillonite) was pillared by zirconium
oxychloride solution. 2 g of montmorillonite was
dispersed into demineralized water and shaken for 5 h.
Zirconium oxychloride was poured into the dispersed
montmorillonite gradually. The result was separated
and washed by demineralized water several times until
it was free of chloride ion. Intercalationed montmorillonite by zircon metal ion was calcinated at temperature of 350 C in O2 atmospher for 4 h, this result is
.
referred as ZrO2 PM.
The ZM was soaked in solution of NiNO3 and
(NH4)6Mo7O24 for 24 h and dried. The ZM containing
Ni and Mo was dried at the temperature of 130 C for
3 h. Then, it was oxidized by flowing O2 gas at the
temperature of 350 C and the flow rate of 1.0 mL s-1
for 3 h. The prepared catalyst was then reduced by
flowing H2 gas at the temperature of 350 C and the
flow rate of 1.0 mL s-1 for 3 h. The product is referred
as NMZM. The BET surface area and pore volume of
the catalyst were measured by nitrogen adsorption
using Autosorb I (Quantachrome Automated Gas
Sorption System). The samples were degassed for 5 h
.
under vacuum at 300 C prior to the analysis.
3. Equipment and Experimental Procedure
397
Temperature
controler
Thermocouple
Condenser
Furnace
Feed
Liquid
Product
Salt Solution
Drain
Peristaltic Pump
Flow meter
H2
The result of SEM analysis of catalyst montmorillonite, ZM and MNZM at 10.000 times magnification
is shown in Fig. 2. SEM diagrams show no change on
structure and surface texture of nature montmorillonite
and ZM. The comparison between SEM ZM and
NMZM catalyst shows that NMZM catalyst has more
small particles of Ni and Mo metal, attaching on the
surface of ZM. The entrance of Ni and Mo metal to
the surface of ZM does not change the topology of
.
surface of ZM layer.
The XRD data on nature montmorillonite indicates
the characteristic peak at 2 = 5.96 (d = 14.81 ),
Fig. 2. Result of SEM figure of catalyst (a) monmorillonite, (b) ZM and (c) NMZM.
Result of hydrocracking oil residue by using catalysts montmorillonite, ZM and NMZM is shown in
Table 3. The data show that catalyst NMZM has the
ability to catalyze hydrocracking process (80% conversion) better than catalysts M and ZM. Although the
presence of zircon, nickel and molybdenum metal in
catalyst can increase the catalytic activity, nickel and
molybdenum also increase the formation of coke on
.
catalysts.
Liquid product is then analized by using gas chromatography to characterize the fraction into gasoline,
Table 3. Result of hydrocracking oil residue
Catalyst
Conversion (%)
Monmorillonite
34
ZM
54
NMZM
85
5.96
M
Intensity
ZM
NMZM
10
20
Interplanar spacing distance
Fig. 3. XRD paterns of monmorillonite (M), ZM and
NMZM.
Tabel 2. Parameter of catalyst porosity
-1
Catalyst
Surface area (m2 g-1) Volume of pore (mL g )
4.3 x 10-2
Monmorillonite
25
ZM
113
1.9 x 10-1
NMZM
74
1.3 x 10-1
398
Gasoline
Kerosen
Diesel
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
Monmorillonite
ZM
NMZM
Catalyst
Coke (%)
2.8
1.3
6.1
399
Layer of monmorillonite
Layer of monmorillonite
-
Si O Si OH Si O Si O Si OH Si O Si O Si OH Si O Si O
Si O Si OH Si O Si O Si OH Si O Si O Si OH Si O Si O
H
O
H 2C
HC
H 2C
O C
O
O C
O
O C
R1
R1
C C C+
C C C
H 2C
Catalytic Cracking HC O
R2
H 2C
Al O Al OH Al O Al O Al OH Al O Al OH Al O Al O
-
C C C
C
O
Hydrogenation
C C C
C
O
R1
R2
Nonene
Ni, Mo
Nonane
Al O Al OH Al O Al O Al OH Al O Al OH Al O Al O
Layer of monmorillonite
Layer of monmorillonite
which is fatty acid with one double bound at the middle of carbon chain. First step reaction is cracking of
doble bound carbon chain on oleic acid. Double bound
is easier to be cracked than single bound. One result of
cracking is nonene (C9) with double bound on nonene
reacting with hydrogen forming a more stable molecule nonane. Mechanism of reaction is shown in Fig.
5. However, biofuel products are not only C9, but also
C8, C10, C13, C17 and C19. Before forming light hydrocarbon (C2-C10), triglycerides were firstly cracked because
of thermal cracking of heavy molecule (C12-C20).
.
CONCLUSIONS
Based on the data, we can conclude that pillared
ZM increases porosity of nature monmorilonite,
whereas NMZM decreases the porosity of catalyst.
However, NMZM catalyst can be used as a catalyst for
hydrocracking oil residue from POME with 80% yield
and 30% gasoline fraction. Biofuel product is still a
mixture of gasoline, kerosene and diesel fraction.
Existence of Ni and Mo metal in catalyst is effective
enough to increase biofuel product and gasoline fraction. However, forming of coke during cracking is
unavoidable.
.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The financial support by the DP2M DIKTI and
Sriwijaya University under STRANAS scheme research grant (No: 0460.a/H9/PL/2010) is gratefully
acknowledged.
.
REFERENCES
1.
2.
400
Discussions of this paper may appear in the discussion section of a future issue. All discussions should
be submitted to the Editor-in-Chief within six months
of publication.
.
Manuscript Received: July 6, 2012
Revision Received: October 19, 2012
and Accepted: October 30, 2012