You are on page 1of 30

ISSN: 0002-9300

Copyright Thomson & Reuters. 2016.


Impact Factor: 1.056

USA 2016

The American Society of International Law


2223 Massachusetts Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20008
Phone +1 202-939-6000
Fax +1 202-797-7133
USA 2016, Vol: 111 January February (1)
The American Journal of International Law
Publisher: American Society of International Law
Features articles and comment on current developments
in international law and international relations.

SPECIAL ISSUE

Current impact factor: 1.05


IMPACT FACTOR RANKINGS
2016 Impact Factor

Available summer 2016

2009 Impact Factor

1.056

ADDITIONAL DETAILS
5-year impact

0.98

Website

http://ajil.info/, http://www.asil.org/

Other titles

American Journal of International Law

ISSN

0002-9300

OCLC

1480149

Pre-print
Author cannot archive a pre-print version
Post-print
Author cannot archive a post-print version
Conditions
On employer's website or institutional repository
Publisher's version/PDF must be used

Editorial Board
American Journal of International Law
BOARD OF EDITORS
Editors in Chief
JOSE ENRIQUE ALVAREZ
New York University School of Law
BENEDICT KINGSBURY
New York University School of Law
University of Utah
DAPO AKANDE
Oxford University
KAREN ALTER
Northwestern University
ANTONY ANGHIE
University of Utah
MAHNOUSH H. ARSANJANI
New Haven, Connecticut
EYAL BENVENISTI
Tel Aviv University Faculty of Law
LAURENCE BOISSON DE CHAZOURNES
University of Geneva School of Law
CURTIS A. BRADLEY
Duke University School of Law
JUTTA BRUNNEE
University of Toronto Faculty of Law
DAVID D. CARON
Kings College London Dickson Poon School
of Law
BHUPINDER SINGH CHIMNI
Jawaharlal Nehru University
JAMES THUO GATHII
Loyola Law School
TOM GINSBURG
University of Chicago Law School
RYAN GOODMAN
New York University School of Law
LAURENCE R. HELFER
Duke University School of Law
ALEXANDRA HUNEEUS
University of Wisconsin Law School
KAREN KNOP
University of Toronto Law School
DONALD M. MCRAE

University of Ottawa Faculty of Law


CATHERINE POWELL
Fordham Law School
KAL RAUSTIALA
Univ. of California (UCLA) School of Law
NATALIE REID
Debevoise & Plimpton
HENRY J. RICHARDSON, III
Temple University Beasley School of Law
ANTHEA ROBERTS
London School of Economics
Columbia University School of Law
GREGORY SHAFFER
Univ. of California, Irvine School of Law
DAVID P. STEWART
Georgetown University Law Center
ALAN O. SYKES
New York University School of Law
CARLOS MANUEL VAZQUEZ
Georgetown University Law Center
INGRID WUERTH
Vanderbilt Law School
ex officio
LORI FISLER DAMROSCH
MARK DAVID AGRAST
Honorary Editor
GEORGE H. ALDRICH
St. Michaels, Maryland
RICHARD B. BILDER
University of Wisconsin Law School
CHARLES N. BROWER
The Hague, the Netherlands
EDITH BROWN WEISS
Georgetown University Law Center
THOMAS BUERGENTHAL
George Washington Univ. Law School
CHRISTINE M. CHINKIN
London School of Economics
JAMES R. CRAWFORD
University of Cambridge
JOHN R. CROOK

Potomac, Maryland
ANTHONY DAMATO
Northwestern University School of Law
University of Denver
MICHAEL J. GLENNON
Fletcher School, Tufts University
ROSALYN HIGGINS
The Hague, the Netherlands
JOHN H. JACKSON
Georgetown University Law Center
FREDERIC L. KIRGIS
Washington and Lee Univ. School of Law
CYNTHIA CRAWFORD LICHTENSTEIN
Boston College Law School
ANDREAS F. LOWENFELD (1930 2014)
New York University School of Law
DAVID A. MARTIN
University of Virginia School of Law
MICHAEL J. MATHESON
George Washington Univ. Law School
THEODOR MERON
The Hague, the Netherlands
JOHN NORTON MOORE
University of Virginia School of Law
BERNARD H. OXMAN
University of Miami School of Law
W. MICHAEL REISMAN
Yale Law School
STEPHEN M. SCHWEBEL
Washington, D.C.
DINAH SHELTON
George Washington Univ. Law School
PETER D. TROOBOFF
Covington & Burling LLP

RICHARD FALK
University of California, Santa Barbara
TOM J. FARER
RUTH WEDGWOOD
SJohns Hopkins University
BURNS H. WESTON
The University of Iowa College of Law
Senior Editors
ANNA ASCHER
STEPHEN SCHER
Assistant to the Editors in Chief
RACHEL JONES
Associate Editor
JULIE ROBERTS FURGERSON

Indexing and abstracting


America: History & Life
American Bibliography of Slavic and East European Studies
Arts & Humanities Citation Index
Bibliographic Index
Current Abstracts
Current Contents
Historical Abstracts (Online)
International Review of Biblical Studies
Personal Alert
PubMed
Russian Academy of Sciences Bibliographies
Scopus
TOC Premier
Web of Science

American Journal of International Law, vol. 1 (January 2016), http://www.ajil.info

AMERICAN JOURNAL
OF
INTERNATIONAL LAW
VOL.111

February 2016
CONTENTS

Editorial
JOSE ENRIQUE ALVAREZ

NO.2
PAGE

Unification of the Application of International Law in the Municipal


Realm: A Challenge for Contemporary International Law
12
A.O. Enabulele and C.O. Imoedemhe
The Uses of Analogia Iuris in the Louisiana Code of Practice (1825)*
24
Shael Herman
Un couple surprenant: prescription extinctive et libert contractuelle
Sylvette Guillemar 52
Judicial Review under the Irish Constitution: More American than
Commonwealth
Seamus OTuama
Legal Language and the Process of Drafting the Principles on a European Law of Sales
Viola Heutger
The Legal Aspect of Ensuring the Freedom in Modern Society
Garib Allahverdiyev
International Law in Domestic Systems
E.A. Alkema

74
96
118
127

Cross-border Successions. The New Commission Proposal: Contents 152


and Way Forward. A Report on the Academy of European Law Conference of 18 and 19 February 2010, Trier
Eveline Ramaekers

217

American Journal of International Law, vol. 1 (January 2016), http://www.ajil.info

159
Necessity To Engage With The Elements Of Judicial System
And Its Impact On The Provision And Development Of Justice
And Security
Vali ShirPour
Judicial Loyalty Through Dissent or Why The Timing is Perfect 175
for Belgium to Embrace Separate Opinions
Bart Nelissen
190
The Influence of the Post-war European Constitutions on the
Constitution of the Irish Free State
Laura Cahillane
Constitutional Fidelity throughout Time. A Comparative Survey

202

Anna Silvia Bruno


"Agile Alliances" line in Azerbaijan-USA relations

Ramazan Uslu

219

238
Homosexuality and Child Custody through the Lenses of Law:
Between Tradition and Fundamental Rights
Denise Amram
258

Ajil Submissions

218

American Journal of International Law, vol. 1 (January 2016), http://www.ajil.info

American Journal of International Law: 2016.


Impact Factor: 1.056, Vol.111, No.1 (January-February):,
DOI: 10.989765/2016.15.8.45

"Agile Alliances" line in Azerbaijan-USA relations


Ramazan Uslu

Relations with the U.S. and Europe are a priority in the foreign policy of Azerbaijan. Beginning the early 90s of the last century, the influence of America and Europe, on the
post-Soviet space, as well as the South Caucasus became stronger. In particular, the
United States pursues a more active and influential politics. Western countries have
played a key role in destroying Warsaw Bloc and the Socialist camp to turn our newly
independent countries towards Europe and the U.S. Other factors were freedom, democracy, respect for human rights of the western states, as well as their economic and military power, had to act as a promoter. No issue was resolved without the involvement of
the Western countries in world politics. Therefore, the post-Soviet countries, as well as
Azerbaijan, must to a large extent take the Western factor of foreign policy into account
and have done it.

I.

Introduction

In 1992, U.S. Secretary of State James Baker visited Baku in order to establish official relations between the two countries. The U.S. Embassy was opened in Baku in March of the
same year. After that a continuous relationship was established. However, due to the inability of Azerbaijan government to raise the level of cooperation, the U.S. Congress in October 1992 adopted a document: so-called "907 amendment" to the "Freedom Support
Act". Thus, Azerbaijan has got a serious blow from the U.S. policy. It was clearly understood that Azerbaijan had to make a lot of the amendments to comply with foreign policy
of the West. Starting the second half of 1993, the country began to take pragmatic policy
towards the U.S. The first visit of the President of Azerbaijan to the United States was the

Assist. Prof. Dr. Ramazan USLU Agri Ibrahim Cecen University, Art and Sciences Faculty, History Department, Chair,
ruslu@hotmail.com.

219

American Journal of International Law, vol. 1 (January 2016), http://www.ajil.info

beginning of the process. That visit took place in September 1994. On that date the 49th
session of the UN General Assembly was held. In the speech at the session the President of
Azerbaijan stressed that "the leading role in shaping a new world order belongs to the
United Nations... "1.
It is another part of his speech he emphasized that the U.S., Europe and Russia played a
major role in world politics, and although there were differences between the West and
Russia in their views on the resolution of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict, he said that opportunities to reach a common position didnt exhaust. His emphasis on the UN leading
role in shaping a new geopolitical landscape was a sign of strong side of Azerbaijan foreign
policy. So, Azerbaijan was interested in developing relations with any major geopolitical
power , but the regulation of international relations couldnt be done by different states,
must be available to the UN only. At the same time, if Azerbaijan accepts direction towards
the West in the foreign policy as a priority, it does not mean that it intends to entrust totally its fate to United States and Europe. So, Azerbaijan is interested in the close cooperation with Russia, however it does not want to become dependent on2.
Two factors are standing behind this kind of chosen course. First of all Azerbaijan
shouldnt turn into the arena of the world's great powers clash, on the contrary, the powerful countries of the world have to gain a chance to cooperate with Azerbaijan. Secondly,
Azerbaijan should select the line of "agile alliance" not to get under the influence of any
geopolitical power. "Agile alliance" enables the country to come out of the grip of global
power poles, as well as lets you choose the position in the interests of the state in rapidly
changing situations. This course does not make Azerbaijan take responsibility in front of
any geopolitical power.
In this context, the Director of the Research Center of the Russian Postindustrial Society Vladislav Inozemtsevs evaluation seems to be very interesting. Russian professor writes:Azerbaijan itself is the only small country which is in the right place at
the right time. Its current and future leaders are turning to be great reformers. It
has e all chances to become the eq /
: ., . , , 1994, 174
.
uivalent of Singapore and Taiwan of the Caucasus" 3.
1.

A well-known politician and statesman Zbigniew Brzezinski valued Azerbaijan as one of the most important "geopolitical support points of Eurasia. In Z.
Brzezinski's geopolitical concept those "geopolitical support points" should fulfill
their function as "points" of influence on major geopolitical competitors of the U.S.

/ : ., . , , 1994, 174 p.
2 Mammedov N. Foreign policy: Realities and the prognosis. Baku, 2013, p. 134
3 Inozemtsev V.L. The great politics in little places: Azerbaycann geosiyasi arenada gelecek planlar nedir? // Azerbaijan Focus,
2009, 1(1), p. 70
1

220

American Journal of International Law, vol. 1 (January 2016), http://www.ajil.info


For example, Turkey or Azerbaijan could serve as a support point on the Caucasus to perform the U.S. policy in Russia. Here's a kind of a goal to influence of a
certain country upon another one4.

Azerbaijan is of those independent countries who dont accept namely this function. His
"agile alliance" formation attempts in foreign policy and its reference not to great states
but to international organisations (mainly UN) refers to the realization of the purpose
served. This policy turned Azerbaijan, not becoming an instrument of any great state, to be
a leader of the South Caucasus and a global level geopolitical player. The following thought
of the President Ilham Aliyev expressed the very position of our country: "Azerbaijan has
never been and never will be a changing geopolitical card as some of its neighbors5.
Figuratively speaking, Azerbaijan has been able to transform its status of Euroasian geopolitical support point country to the geopolitical player. This should be considered as the
greatest success achieved during the 23 years of independence. Contents of policy of our
country in the direction towards the U.S. and Europe we consider more constuctive and
should rather be looked at in the light of this success.
First official visit of Heydar Aliyev to the U.S. in the summer of 1997 was of great role to
develop relations between Azerbaijan and the U.S. Yet in 1994, he being in New York at the
49th session of the UN General Assembly in New York met with the U.S. President Bill Clinton. At that meeting Heydar Aliyev gave broad information on Azerbaijan, and Azerbaijan
leadership position on restoration of peace in the region, and provision of safety. Then U.S.
President valued highly his Azerbaijani counterpart arguments, and expressed his beliefs
on prospects of cooperation between the two countries. He stressed that the "Contract of
the Century" was the great historical event6.
And in 1997, the two countries already started to develop concret content relations.
B.Clinton announced three aspects in relations with Azerbaijan. Those are peace and security restoration, Azerbaijan sovereignty security and terretorial integrity restoration and
issues on democracy development. He explained his attention to those problems because
of strategic position of Azerbaijan in the region, to gain successful development and sustainable stability the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict should be solved through serious steps7.
After Presidents expanded talks, the Joint Statement on the U.S.-Azerbaijan relations, and
mutual investment protection and promotion agreement were signed between the governments of the Republic of Azerbaijan and the United States. Heydar Aliyev made the comBrzezinski Z. The Grand Chessboard. American Primacy and Its Geostrategic Imperatives, Basic Books, NY, 1997
Mammedov N. About the main directions of Azerbaijan foreign policy // Azerbaijan Focus, 2010, 2 (2), p.20
6 Inozemtsev V.L. The great politics in little places: Azerbaycann geosiyasi arenada gelecek planlar nedir? // Azerbaijan Focus,
2009, 1(1), p.69
7 The President of Azerbaijan Republic Heydar Aliyevs statement about the mutual protection and encouragement of capital
invests and the joint statement about America-Azerbaijan relatons in the ceremony of signing the contract between the
governments of Azerbaijan Republic and USA/ Azerbaijan newspaper, August 3, 1997.
4
5

221

American Journal of International Law, vol. 1 (January 2016), http://www.ajil.info

pact statement at the signing ceremony on ways of cooperation between the two countries.
The statement said: "Azerbaijan appreciates its independence as a great historical
achievement and the preservation of our independence an issue of honored responsibility.
Our nation is committed to freedom and national independence, and will do so in the future. It is very important and significant for us to do this in cooperation with the United
States to build partnerships and expand relations, development."8
There was a greater meaning behind every word of the President of Azerbaijan. With that
the U.S.were informed that Azerbaijan keeps ita independence and sovereignty were beyond everythng. It was noted that, everyone who wanted to harm it, including the United
States, Azerbaijan would resist as a state. The fate of Azerbaijan's economic and energy
cooperation with the U.S. will depend on of those principles implementation. Alonside
with those aspects pointed out by Heydar Aliyev, he stresses that cooperation development
and its expansion with the United States was very important.
The situation was clear to both sides. Azerbaijan would not accept any harmful to sovereignty condition. It would never accept occupation of territories. So he was decided to create ademocratic state. He was determined to develop relations with the West on parity
counterpart conditions. Finally, he would do his best to provide security and establish
peace in the region. The official Washington naturally recognised and signed the abovementioned document9
One very significant feature of the said document should be stressed. Azerbaijani President
wisely presented econimic-energy cooperation in relations with geopolitical factors. To get
provision for counterpart investment means to provide totally sovereignty and independence to Azerbaijan. Once large investment is done into Western-South Caucasus, the special attention should be paid to its security provision. The investments security directly was
dependent on Azerbaijan stability. Thus, the West is interested in allprocesses related with
the internal stability in Azerbaijan. From this point of view, the problem of NagornoKarabakh, Azerbaijans gradually democratisation, security of investments are still staying
in the interest range of Washington10.
Heydar Aliyev obtained strategic results with his first visit to Washington. The following
processes fully confirmed foresight of Azerbaijan leader. The first, the security problems of
the international energy projects hesitated Armenia and its supporters from wide sabotage
plans. The second, the known events between Russia and Georgia on August 8, 2008

The President of Azerbaijan Republic Heydar Aliyevs statement about the mutual protection and encouragement of capital
invests and the joint statement about America-Azerbaijan relatons in the ceremony of signing the contract between the
governments of Azerbaijan Republic and USA/ Azerbaijan newspaper, August 3, 1997.
9 Mammedov N. About the main directions of Azerbaijan foreign policy // Azerbaijan Focus, 2010, 2 (2), p. 17-50.
10 Mammedov N. Foreign policy: Realities and the prognosis. Baku, 2013, p.136
8

222

American Journal of International Law, vol. 1 (January 2016), http://www.ajil.info

showd, that security of energy progects was secured by global geopolitical powers. It is zero
danger to those projects. Up to now it is the same in every case11
It is seen in the above presented thought of B. Clinton that important factors which give a
special content to Azerbaijan- U.S. relationship and they consist of gaining internal stability and successful development. So, Azerbaijan authorities first of all gained internal stability, as well as parallel to that it gave a stimule to social-economic development. The internal stability was gained and became able due to elimination of attempts of one-by-one
coup-de-tants. The leading factor of social-economic development was sign of the Contract of the Century12
Having obtained these two successes the President of Azerbaijan did his first official visit to
Washington. That was well-calculated step towards the future. For the comparison, some
heads of post-Soviet countries were going to Washington with requests, to ask help, to
make a political marketing to stay at the power. But nevertheless of hard aggression the
President of Azerbaijan obtained internal stability, signed strategic economic contract
(The Contract of the Century) and went toWashington as a leader of the independent
state13
Thus, the first official visit of the President of Azerbaijan to the U.S. defined directions of
relationship strategy and concret development between the two countries. The U.S. party
showed that being in the relationships with Azerbaijan it recognised that the Southern
Caucasus as strategic region. And then they paid strict attention to provide peace and security here. And finally, in this context protection of state sovereignty and restoration of
integrity of Azerbaijan became important for the U.S.
These three aspects could be consolidated round two ideas. The first, the U.S. gives great
priority to security of the Southern Caucasus. The second, principal importance for them is
sovereignty of Southern Caucasus countries. And it was not difficult to feel what stood behind these thoughts: not to get under the influence of other than the U.S. mighty geopolitical powers. The U.S. being global power were thinking of establishing hegemony in the region14
The U.S.-Azerbaijan relationship destinated cooperation between two countriesbased on
those principles for further years. Up to now the same principles are modifying the range
and the content of their cooperation. The most essential is that Azerbaijan is faithful to
promises done.

Mammedov N. Foreign policy: Realities and the prognosis. Baku, 2013, p.137
., . . : XXI / , .
: : . -, 2007, p.145
13 Sevdimov T. The resons of crisis between Russia and Georgia. Bak, 2013. 506 s.
11
12

14

Mammedov N. Foreign policy: Realities and the prognosis. Baku, 2013, p.138

223

American Journal of International Law, vol. 1 (January 2016), http://www.ajil.info

On September, 8-9, 1998 the international conference on restoration of Historical Silk Way
was held in Baku. On April,17, 1999 there was Baku-Supsa oil pipeline opening ceremony
with participation of the Heads of Azerbaijan, Ukraine and Georgia. On November, 18,
1999 in Istanbul in the frame of OSCE Summit the agreement On the transportation of
crude oil by the main Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan export pipeline through areas of Azerbaijan Republic, Georgia and Turkey Republic was signed. That was serious step towards strategic
cooperation of region states and their integration into Europe. On May, 24-25, 2005 BakuTbilisi-Ceyhan main oil export pipeline was given to exploitation. The same year on October, 12 the Ceremony of Geogian part of oil pipeline exploitation start was held.
Alongside with energy area, Azerbaijan participates in the U.S. counter-terror and peacekeeping program. Azerbaijan operators carry their functions as part of International Security Forces in different areas of the world. Our country does its best in sharing responsibilities in security, weapon control, defense and other areas of Azerbaijan and the U.S. relation
development. The process of cooperation broadening is being continued in the frame of
the Euro-Atlantic Partnership Council and NATO Partnership for Peace program. The
latter issue is shown as a separate item in the Order of President Heydar Aliyev released on
Septembeer, 2, 199715. As a whole, Azerbaijan was always in close cooperation with the U.S.
in security issues.
Our country being involved in different programs was always implementing all tasks and is
continuing to do so. For the past period Azerbaijan was an active participant in international projects carried out in the Southern Caucasus by the West. And all projects of global
importance which could influence western energy security were supported. Nabucco,
Southen Corridor, TransCaspian... The U.S. doesnt imagine those energy projects
without Azerbaijan.
It is worth mentioning some thoughts addressed during the meeting of Heydar Aliyev and
Richard Morningstar on December, 16, 1998. During the said meeting in the President Palace R. Morningstar keeping in mind cooperation in the energy area told Heydar Aliyev:
You played a special, exclusive role in creating a turning point in this area16
At the same meeting the President of Azerbaijan, speaking about further energy provision to the West from the Caspian Sea and its special importance, presented to attention of
the guest in very interesting manner saying: You know, that nobody can tell you the age of
the Caspian Sea. It has the same age as the Earth has. But in XX and XXI centuries a great
revolution has taken place in mineral resources of the sea. We are the participants of this
About the measures of expansion of partnered relations between the Republic of Azerbaijan and USA. The order of the President
of Azerbaijan Republic. Baku city, September 2, 1997, 657. URL: http://e-qanun.az/files/framework/data/4/f_4250.htm
15

From the conversation at the meeting with the President of the Republic of Azerbaijan Heydar Aliyev and the representative
delegation with the privite councillor of the President of the United States and the Secretary of State, the ambassador Richard
Morningstar - Baku, December 16, 1998, "Heydar Aliyevs heritage" International Electronic Library, URL: Http: //library.aliyevheritage.org/ az/86084273.html
16

224

American Journal of International Law, vol. 1 (January 2016), http://www.ajil.info

revolution. I consider that this revoution will be useful for all nations, including Azerbaijan
nation. And for that we have to work hard17
In his speech at Georgetown University (Washington, September 18, 2009) William C.
Burns declared touching upon the problem of energy projects realizing among Azerbaijan
and USA:
The conversation about the development of the trade brings me to the energy problem
which is the next area of our bilateral co-operation. The USA and Azerbaijan have a lasting
intercession in the important strategically energy projects creating the relations between
West and East.
This week Azerbaijan is getting ready to celebrate the fifteenth anniversary of the Contract
of the Century which caused the building of Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan pipeline. Today with the
help of this pipeline about one million barrel oil is exported a day. Azerbaijan finishing the
building of the Southern Caucasian Gas Pipe is on the threshold of the new and more perspective level of the development of the energy section. Signing Nabucco Contract among
governments was an important event in the opening of natural gas corridor to Europe. Developing this opportunity by Turkey and Azerbaijan and coming to an agreement on the
required price, transit and other problems for the reality of Southern Corridor is very important. Such projects are not only satisfied with the opening of Caspian energy resources
to the world, but at the same time it also speeded Azerbaijan economy growth up and secured the more independent economical future of Azerbaijan nation.
I see that some people consider the energy policy of USA and Russia as a next Great Play in
Middle Asia. Such kind of thinking is wrong. In energy problems as in all other trade
branches though always some competition elements exist the USA doesnt believe the unsuccessful play of energy safety. Trying together we can have more benefit than to be
against to each other. We decisively believe that having more pipe-lines among countries
increases the number of different sources and routes, secures better marketing prices and
defends from the obstacles in the supply of favor of all countries. That is why we hope that
Azerbaijan and its neighbors will continue the oil production. In order to help to show the
production in Europe and in different markets with the aim of finding the reliable and
transparent ways we agitate the negotiations now going on among Azerbaijan, Turkmenistan, Kazakhstan, Turkey and other supporters. And I want to assure you that the USA is
ready to work with Azerbaijan, different friends of ours in the region and the private sections in order to strengthen and broaden the global energy supply18
Some U.S. activities which create questions are observed currently on the background of all
that. The official Washington doesnt want to link normalization of Turkey Armenia rela17
18

Ibid
William C. Burns. Azerbaijan US relations. Goergtown University, Washington city, 18 September, 2009.

225

American Journal of International Law, vol. 1 (January 2016), http://www.ajil.info

tionship with Nagorno-Karabakh problem solvation. Former U.S. State Secretary Hilary
Clinton being on trip in June, 2012 in Southern Caucasus stated in Yerevan, that the official Washington doesnt see any relation between Turkey-Armenia issue and NagornoKarabakh conflict solvation19 . As to us, that was an attempt to turn us from totally independent policy course away, but that attempt was a fiasco. Though the USA has also own
arguments. W. Burns said them so:
But how does the Azerbaijan government struggle with the corruption as it promised in
its National Strategy in the condition of not having the independent press which shed the
problems? The free press and the strong civil society are the efficient means of saving our
citizens and struggling against the corruption. Arresting of opposition journalists periodically, preventing the broadcasting of Free Europe Radio/ Freedom Radio, The Voice of
America and BBC in Azerbaijan had created the serious troubles in this sphere. We have
invited Azerbaijan government to pay attention the results of such activity influence in
comparison with democratic aims and the more extensive development. Increasing of
transparence in management will help Azerbaijan to realize the democratic principles affirming itself and the economical development which it wants to achieve. The US renders
assistance and gives trainings in order to improve the state expenses of planning, broadening the opportunities of trade finance system and strengthening of competition abilities of
private section. Our assistance activity supports the election reforms and finances the education of journalists. They also defend the Non-Governmental Organizations which help
the youth groups struggling against the corruption and creating new spaces in internet
networks for democratic discussions. We hope that the active civil society completes the
role of the government and creates the dynamic state20
Of course, the U.S. understands that Azerbaijan pursues totally independent foreign policy.
Azerbaijan exports oil and gas over 7 routes. Internal stability is at the high level. Economy
of the country is increasing. Azerbaijan is a member of the international counter-terror
coalition. It is one of main participants of interantioanl energy projects. Analysts emphasise that Azerbaijan has got a serious place in energy provision to the West. Simultaneously, Azerbaijan plays an important role in provision the post-Soviet countries with energy. At this background formation of the democratic society successfully continues. In
this case Azerbaijan should be considered, because Azerbaijan is very important partner of
the West. However, the manifested relations of the U.S. and Europe in respect of NagornoKarabakh conflict is contravertial to partnership.
The importance of Azerbaijan issue for the West was explained by analyst Ariel Cohen in
an article in The National Interest magazine, specially noted: The occupation of Karabakh is a powder barrel which can explode the Southern Caucasus... If it happens...Then
/ Regnum, 2 2012.
URL: http://www.regnum.su/news/1537836.html.
20 William C. Burns. Azerbaijan US relations. Goergtown University, Washington city, 18 September, 2009.
19

226

American Journal of International Law, vol. 1 (January 2016), http://www.ajil.info

the chance of attraction to regional issues increases for Iran, another partner of Armenia.
All that does not meet the U.S. national interests21
In his speech at Georgetown University (Washington, September 18, 2009) William C.
Burns declared:
From the security view point one of our most superior priorities is struggle against the
forcible extremism. Azerbaijan being moderate, wordly and forming the main part of the
population from Mouslems was one of the main ally in this campaign. It shared the informations, intensified the efforts of fighting against financing of terrorism and arrested the
suspicious terrorists. Azerbaijan being the active participant of the Intercession Program
For Peace of NATO develops the many-branched secirity relations with own neighbors in
the region. It periodically helped to NATO and allied operations in Irag, Afganistan and
Kosovo, dear Ambassador, we appericate them very well. In 2008 Azerbaijan armed forces
finished five years military service in Irag, for many times with USA Marine Forces. This
year the number of Azerbaijanian goodwillers in Afganistan has been increased from forty
five to ninety. Azerbaijan also gives the valuable rights such as to fly from its air space, to
fill fuel and to land to USA and union air forces planes which are sent to Irag and Afganistan. As Azerbaijan gives the important gifts to the international security efforts we understand that the country also has problems about security. The main way of achieving the
lasting peace in the region is to achieve the sollution of Mountainous Garabag problem
with peace. Let me assure you that Prezident Obama and Secretary of State Clinton are
ready to do everything to support this purpose. We want to see the adjoining living of
Azerbaijan and Armenia in peaceful situation which makes the way to the mutual development22
The former Minister for Foreign Affairs of Russia Igor Ivanov who was the secretary of Security Council during 2004-2007 years writes that Establishing of the process reconstructing of the world system which began from 80s years of the last century hasnt finished yet. We shall feel the influence of the changes after 10s years. But this transition is
still being accompanied by the painful processes23
The creation of critical situations in the ranks of painful processes noted by I.Ivanov has a
special place. Canadian professor of international attitudes Ramesh Takur who was the
assistant of General Secretary in UN Organization considers that UN Organization will
not be the centre of co-ordinating the national interests and their compromiser negotiator
among states which have the deep difference opinion among them24 . The famous specialists in political-study Z. Bjezinski, H.Kissinger, F. Zakariyya and others note that the soluCohen
A.
The
Secretarys
Daunting
Agenda
//
The
National
Interest.
June
4,
2012
http://nationalinterest.org/commentary/the-secretarysdaunting-agenda-7001.
22 William C. Burns. Azerbaijan US relations. Goergtown University, Washington city, 18 September, 2009.
23 .. XXI ? // , 2011, 6, c. 17-27.
24 . :
// , 2011, 6, c. 157-167.
21

227

American Journal of International Law, vol. 1 (January 2016), http://www.ajil.info

tion of critical situations is a difficult process. In 2012 Russia included the regulation of
critical situations as a separate paraghraph to the document of About the legislative enactment of realizing of foreign policy course of Russia Federation25. As it is seen from the
beginning of the second half of the 20th century creation of critical situations, different
characteric conflicts is the main problem worrying the world community. From 1988 Azerbaijan was also drawn into the conflict in its objectionable cases. A group of Armenian
chauvinists living in Mountainous Garabag area supported by Armenia began separatist
activity. Disintegration of the USSR this conflict overturned the war between Armenia and
Azerbaijan. Armenian armed forces getting strong support from abroad occupied 20 percents of Azerbaijanian area. So Armenian-Azerbaijan, Mountainous Garabag conflict began. The following processes showed that outside forces have a strict influence to this conflict and giving the extensive support to the aggressor they create obstacles to restore of
Azerbaijan territorial integrity (1, 188-189). And this fact was a cause for associating with
Euro-Atlantic area.
One of the directions of USA-Azerbaijan relations is co-operation in NATO.As it is known,
Azerbaijan-NATO relations started their formation in March 1992 with the admission of
Azerbaijan to its body, the North Atlantic Cooperation Council. The Azerbaijani delagation
first participated in the seminar of the NATO countries held in Turkey in October 1992 and
met its Secretary-General Manfred Werner. A high-level cooperation between the North
Atlantic Alliance and Azerbaijan was founded in 1994. During his visit to Brussels on May
4, 1994, the President of the Republic of Azerbaijan Heydar Aliyev signed the "Partnership
for Peace Program" (PFP), which provided the cooperation of NATO cooperation with former Soviet republics (14, 54-55). Till 1994 Azerbaijan-NATO relations almost had a episodical and superficial character. But later Azerbaijan which had the military operations of
separatist powers in its area, having occupied 20 percents of the territory by the Armenian
military joinings needed to collaborate with powerful international organizations, especially with NATO.
First of all it is an undeniable fact that NATO can play a great role in the peaceful solution
of Garabag problem, free the occupied territories of our republic, return about more than
one million refugees and displaced persons to their own native lands. On the other side
having the co-operation with NATO our republic gets the opportunity of creating the
strategical balance and security system, to solve the disputed matters due to the international law standars, to use the great authority of NATO in the solution of independence and
security problems of Azerbaijan26.
The Azerbaijani-NATO military cooperation strengthened more in 1997. In same year,
Azerbaijan joined the Planning and Review Process (PARP) of the organization. This pro .
, 7 2012. URL: http://kremlin.ru/acts/15256.
26 Caferli V. Azerbaycann Qerb Tehlksizlik sistemine inteqrasiyas: Azerbaycan-Nato elaqeleri. Baku, 2011.p.31
25

228

American Journal of International Law, vol. 1 (January 2016), http://www.ajil.info

ject provides reforms in defense sphere in Azerbaijan. Azerbaijan Republic also joined the
Euro-Atlantic Partnership Council of NATO formed in May, 1997.
The realization of PFP program began in 1996. In June 1995 C. Mackenzie, Deputy Commander-in-Chief of NATO forces in Europe visited Azerbaijan. In his meeting with the
Prezident of Azerbaijan Republic Haydar Aliyev he told that NATO could play an important role in the improvement of the Armed Forces of Azerbaijan. In this meeting the representative of NATO for the first time stressed the importance of liberation of the Azerbaijani
territories from occupation and establishment of peace in the region27 . The visit of General
Secretary of NATO to Baku especially stimulated NATO-Azerbaijan relations and NATO
proved its strict intentions. On the eve of the visit H.Solana declared to the journalists that
during the meeting with the President of Azerbaijan the investigation of solution ways of
the problem would be made efforts28 (21, 32). In November 1997, the President of the Republic of Azerbaijan issued a decree "On the measures for strengthening cooperation between the Republic of Azerbaijan and NATO". A commission of cooperation with NATO
attached to the President of Azerbaijan was established in conformity with this decree. The
commission is charged to coordinate the activities of respective ministries to draft a program in the framework of PFP. The Azerbaijani mission started its activity in NATO headquarters in Brussels. Azerbaijan got the observer status in the session of the Parliamentary
Assembly held in Poland in May 1999. In September of the same year, a platoon of the
Armed Forces of Azerbaijan started to take part in the peace-keeping activities in Kosovo
together with the NATO peacekeepers. But on November 19, 2001, the Republic of Azerbaijan became an associate member of the Parliamentary Assembly . NATO, Europe Union, including Europe Council the integration to cooperation structures and security of
Europe and TransAtlantic take the important place in the foreign policy of Azerbaijan. But
thinking that the process is going smoothly is not a real approach to the matter. First of all
in the inside of the Euro-Atlantic Unity the difference of position is enough. But the indications giving evidence of the weaking of this process are not observed yet29. Henri Kissinger
puts in a claim that the thought difference which shows itself in Euro-Atlantic Council is
known from the sources of transformation of USA-Europe relations. H. Kissinger doesnt
consider as a subjective factor the changing of geo-political interests of great countries of
Europe after the second World War30. According to his thought it is connected with the reaction to four important changings: Disintegrating of Soviet Union, combining of Germany, tendency of looking at the foreign policy as a means of internal policy and increasing
of Europe self-cognize31. Adjoining other processes, causing such principal geo-political
changing of transformations which are going on in Europe-Atlantic space demands the resMadatova G. NATO partnership with Azerbaijan. Materials of the 9th Republic Students Scientific-Practical Conference
dedicated to the 20th anniversary of restoration of independence of Azerbaijan Republic// (December 3, 2011). Baku, 2011
28 Caferli V. Azerbaycann Qerb Tehlksizlik sistemine inteqrasiyas: Azerbaycan-Nato elaqeleri. Baku, 2011. p.32
29 . ? / . . . .. . .: , 2002, p.2262
30 Ibid, p.21
31 Ibid, p. 25
27

229

American Journal of International Law, vol. 1 (January 2016), http://www.ajil.info

toration of structures of common security. H. Kissinger writes about it: It is riskful to


speak about the geo-political unity of Euro-Atlantic space in such situation. But in modern
historical situation the influence of countries situated in this space is very strong to the
world policy. That is why not only Azerbaijan but also in foreign policy of countries situated in different regions of the world the special attention is paid to relations with EuroAtlantic structures of security and co-operation. Today the strong Azerbaijan-USA cooperation is more important than it was usual. There are such great global problems that
not any country can manage it independently. Not depending on the branch of security,
energy or economical and democratic reforms the USA has historical opportunities to help
to achieve the transformation, geo-political and economical potential of our region. In order to realize this unusual duty both of countries needs each other. One of the directions of
the USA-Azerbaijan relations is the cooperation of OSCE. N. Mammedov writes about it:
In the direction of West adjoining USA the Europe countries also have great geopolitical
importance for Azerbaijan. Azerbaijan establishes relations with Europe both Europe Union and with different states in the formation of two-sided coorparation. These relations
began from the beginning of the first years of the independence.
During 1991-1992 years some European countries recognized Azerbaijan. In January 1992
Azerbaijan was accepted as a member for OSCE, but in March the group of Minsk was established. But then Azerbaijan had no official contracts about the cooperation with Europe
countries. The concrete directions of the cooperation were not definited. During 1991-1993
years due to the TACIS programme grants were distributed to Azerbaijan. In May 1993 the
project TRACECA which meant the assistance to the Commonwealth of Independent
States (CIS) was adopted. Two years later the programme INOGATE was accepted. This
programme intends the cooperation of EU, Turkey and CIS countries in the energy
sphere32.
USA and Azerbaijan have lasting cooperation in the important strategical energy projects
creating relations between West and East. Today about one million barrels of oil a day is
exported by the Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan pipeline. Having finished the building of South Caucasus Gas Pipeline Azerbaijan has began the new and more perspective level of development of energy section. Signing of Nabucco intergovernmental agreement was an important event of the new natural gaz corridor to Europe. Developing this opportunity and
coming to the agreement very fast about the problems of price, transit and etc. in order to
realize the South Corridor by Azerbaijan and Turkey are very important. Such kind of projects not only introduced the energy sources of Caspian Sea but also at the same time it
speeded up the development of Azerbaijan economics and ensured more independent economic future of Azerbaijan nation33

32
33

Mammedov N. Foreign policy: Realities and the prognosis. Baku, 2013, p.145-146
William C. Burns. Azerbaijan US relations. Goergtown University, Washington city, 18 September, 2009.

230

American Journal of International Law, vol. 1 (January 2016), http://www.ajil.info

No doubt, one of the most important directions is the cooperation of World Bank which is
the main donor of USA with our country. None of the regional projects realizing in Azerbaijan pass without participation of this finance establishment. Now Azerbaijan is a member of thirty two international and regional Organizations: UN (in March, 1992), the Council of Europe (in March, 2001), OSCE (in Yanuary, 1992), CIS (in September, 1993), Organization of Islamic Conference (in 1992), Europe Unity (Agreement of Partnership and
Cooperation, 1996), ECO (1992), Black Sea Economical Cooperation Organization (1992),
European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (1992), World Bank (1992),
UNESCO, UNICEF, World Health Organization, The International Federation of Red
Cross and Red Crescent Societies (IFRCRC), International Criminal Police Organi-

zation, International Olympic Committee and etc34


One of the most important organizations in Azerbaijan is World Bank. From 1992
being independent Azerbaijan pays a great attention to this cooperation. With the
help of World Bank during the first years of its sovereignty Azerbaijan getting
grants for some important problems and strategic branches began to revive its
economy. In different branches such as from the branch of education till the irrigation system the young independent Republic supported by World Bank began to
see its favorable results. For different capacious and important projects from five
millions USA dollars till five hundred million USA dollars were asked to the Bank.
As it is known only the member countries use the credits of the World Bank. Credits are lasting and they are being given to the country for the need of the economical development programs35 (15,141).
According to the reports of the Azerbaijan National Bank in Azerbaijan the people who have less daily profit than 2, 5 dollars are called poor 36. But due to the
opinion of World Bank in 1999 the poverty border is 2.15 dollars37. During the beginning of the independence the half of the country populations living in poverty
made arrangements of bank cooperation with Azerbaijan. Because the main part of
the activity of the World Bank is to struggle with poverty. As in many countries of
the world in Azerbaijan the attention to ecology is also being increased. One of the
first prepared projects in this branch is Shahdag National Park financed by the
World Bank. The project is about to establish the national park consolidating the
reserves situated in Small Caucasus. To realize this project the World Bank spent
Memmedli . ABSH-n Cenubi Azerbaycanla bal plan var. Bizim yol qezeti, 12.6.2014.
Sulejmanov E. Azerbaijan-World Bank relations after independence.// Materials of the 9th Republic Students Scientific-Practical
Conference dedicated to the 20th anniversary of restoration of independence of Azerbaijan Republic// (December 3, 2011). Baku,
2011. p.141
36 Emiraslanov A. Azerbaycan Iqtisadiyyat ve Bazar Mnasibetleri, Baku, 1998.
37 World Bank, World Development Indicators, 2001, Washington D.C.: World Bank.
34
35

231

American Journal of International Law, vol. 1 (January 2016), http://www.ajil.info

about ten-twelve million dollars. The World Bank took a tender in order to use the
water of Samur River providing the need of drinkable water of Baku and Sumgait
cities. The tender was won by the companies Azersutikinti and Azerenerjitikintigurashdirma. In order to realize this project the World Bank gave two millions
dollar credit. Together with the World Bank, Islam Development Bank and Kuwait
Development Bank the Alat-Gazimammad road got renewed with the program of
Reconstruction of Silk Way. In 1997 the World Bank opened 14.7 millions of dollars credit to privatize the area and improve the village fields 38. In order to give the
finance support of irrigation system development the World Bank decided to give
35 millions of dollar in credit to Azerbaijan. In the explanation of the bank for the
press it is informed that this project gave a chance to improve the irrigation system
of 56 thousand hectares in eleven regions of the Republic39.
At the same time in 2001 the World Bank gave 18 millions of dollars to the Project
of Education Reform of four years (18). With the help international and national
counselors during a year the Program of Education Reform and its component Project of Education Reform of three years was realized with the grant amounting 295
thousand of the USA dollars. Till 2008 from 5 millions of USA dollars given by the
World Bank only 79, 04 % (percents) was spent on, but 500 thousand of the USA
dollars from the presence portion of Azerbaijan Government 79, 28% (percents)
was spent on. Getting the favorable results after this cooperation there were negotiations to prepare the new reform project between Azerbaijan government and the
World Bank. As a result of the negotiations the ten years strategy of the education
reform has been compiled by the Ministry of Education, the priority directions have
been determined and the demanded finance has been prepared40. Azerbaijan has
already done the important activities in the branches of infrastructure and developing the regulation spheres of the country. These efforts made the country to win the
honors name First Reformer in 2009 in the Business Activity Report of the World
Bank. Azerbaijan also was the first country joining the Transparence Initiative in
Mineral Industry Branches determining the global standards in transparence
branch of oil, gas and mountain-mine industry. But one must do a lot to realize
these reform processes, to improve the business fields and to determine the demanded laws and institutions improving the life conditions of all citizens with oil
profits. The wish of joining World Trade Union pursued by Azerbaijan and supported by USA will be the fastest way to involve the international investors and use
Aliyeva M. "Heyat Seviyyesi ve Yoxsulluq Problemi", Azerbaycan qtisadiyyat, Baku, 2000.
Sulejmanov E. Azerbaijan-World Bank relations after independence.// Materials of the 9th Republic Students Scientific-Practical
Conference dedicated to the 20th anniversary of restoration of independence of Azerbaijan Republic// (December 3, 2011). Baku,
2011.p.145
40 Ibid, p.142
38
39

232

American Journal of International Law, vol. 1 (January 2016), http://www.ajil.info

the foreign market advantages. At the same time the laws of World Trade Union
demand the business standards in the world view, transparence and a business
sphere not having the advantage for large and small establishments. It means
eliminating of corruption problem with serious efforts. In 2008 International
Transparency Organization in its report called Indicator of Corruption notes that
corruption is a serious problem in post-Soviet countries, including Azerbaijan. Being effective the corruption shows itself as a supplementary tax and influences to
the small business. It shakes the law and paralyzes the system of law. It steels the
profits of citizens from the economical increase. Unfortunately, the corruption is a
failure of a human nature in the world, including US. But the democratic government bears the responsibility for being undiscovered and unpunished for not giving
the opportunity causing all system failure41.
As it is known today Azerbaijan and USA take part as the strategic partners in the system
of the modern international relations. The relations between the countries rely on the mutual-beneficial cooperation and enrich with the new quality shades regularly. The strategical bases connected both of the countries to each other is the coordination of the national
interests system on the mutual-beneficial cooperations. It is not accidental that US Secretary of State John Kerry wrote to Azerbaijan President Ilham Aliyev in the congratulation
letter about the final investment decision on the second phase of the the natural gas production project Shahdeniz: Dear Mr.President, I congratulate you and the people of
Azerbaijan on the occasion of the final investment decision on the second phase of the
natural gas production project Shahdeniz. December 17 - the final investment decision
is the symbol of the important stage in the history of Azerbaijan. Azerbaijan taking the first
step towards the unification with Europe it becomes the reliable, new source of the world
energy resources and helps to ensure energy security of Europe. As a result of many years
of hard work the realization of South Gas Corridor will be useful for many consortium
partners and neighbours, as well as it will strengthem the independence of Azerbaijan. As
Azerbaijans vision to the future becomes a reality I promise you our help on behalf of the
USA42.
It is necessary to note that according to the strategical view with the President Ilham Aliyevs initiative the realization of South Gas Corridor project is very important for the world
and the region countries. The energy projects realized in our country open new opportunities not only for the regional cooperation, but also for the international cooperation and
influence affirmatively to all supporters to derive advantage from those projects.

William C. Burns. Azerbaijan US relations. Goergtown University, Washington city, 18 September, 2009.
Madatova G. NATO partnership with Azerbaijan. Materials of the 9th Republic Students Scientific-Practical Conference dedicated
to the 20th anniversary of restoration of independence of Azerbaijan Republic// (December 3, 2011). Baku, 2011.
41
42

233

American Journal of International Law, vol. 1 (January 2016), http://www.ajil.info

The political will of Azerbaijan being the initiator of all great projects in the region played
an important role in the realization of the South Gas Corridor and the new route, first of
all, created great opportunities to diversify sources of gas supplies and to open new alternative routes. Appreciating the strategic importance of the project highly, strengthening
the cooperation in energy branch the President Ilham Aliyev initiated to establish the Advisory Council of Energy Ministers of the countries involved in order to realize Southern Gas
Corridor project43.
In order to take part at the first meeting of the Advisory Council of Energy Ministers of the
countries taking part in Southern Gas Corridor project in Baku the Special Envoy and Coordinator for International Energy Affairs of US State Department Amos Hokhstayn who
told in a press conference that it was a project that formed on the initiative of the Azerbaijani authorities and USA appreciates it very much. Recalling his visit to Azerbaijan a few
months ago A. Hokhstayn noted that their aim coming to Baku was to discuss any progress
and measures in the implementation of the corridor: This corridor is very important according to the energy security of Europe. The recent events happened in the world also
show that preserving, protecting and strengthening the security of Europe energy has become a very important issue. That is why we are in Azerbaijan and we have joined such a
meeting. I think that it is one more manifestation of the strong ties between the US and
Azerbaijan. USA and Azerbaijan are cooperating in different styles, but energy cooperation
is one of them ...44.
Speaking about the USA-Azerbaijan relations the cooperation in the humanitarian sphere
must not be forgotten. US officials have always praised the tolerance highly in our country.
It is clear that this issue is one of the priority directions in internal politics of our country.
Nasimi Agayev who was the Consul General of Azerbaijan in Los Angeles wrote in the article Religious tolerance: discovering a model that can work in the dangerous period published in the influential newspaper of US Congress Roll Call dated on January 5, 2015
about the historical tolerance traditions of Azerbaijan, the created life conditions of different religions in the country peacefully together which could be example for all countries in
the world, then he added that though recently the pessimism had enormously increased
about the future of relations among Islamic, Christian and Jewish religions in the background of the events happened in the Middle East the example of Azerbaijan shows its opposite. It is noted that the suitable condition where the atmosphere of peace and harmony
exist has been created in Azerbaijan by the leadership of the country: Azerbaijan is proud
of its religious diversity. Azerbaijan was the birthplace of one of the world's most ancient
Christian countries and the Christian community participated in the formation of Azerbaijan history for centuries... But almost 30 thousand Jewish community living with the
Christian and Muslim communities in Azerbaijan have been living for two thousand years.
Even when the Jews living in the surrounding regions of Azerbaijan were exposed to dan43
44

Bayramov V. Cenub qaz dehlizi layihesinin reallashmas strateji baxmdan mhm nem dashyr. Xalq qezeti, 14.02.2015.
Ibid

234

American Journal of International Law, vol. 1 (January 2016), http://www.ajil.info

ger they had seen Azerbaijan as a safe place for themselves. During World War II the Jews
saved the lives from the fascism had taken refuge in Azerbaijan (28).
N.Agayev noted that when the hate among sects threatened the Middle East, Shiahs and
Sunnites in Azerbaijan live in mutual respect: Agitating the ancient tolerance traditions in
the country Azerbaijan state guidance has always rejected
radicalism, extremism and
hate among religions. The synagogues, mosques, churches were built and are being built
on the support of the Azerbaijan state expense. In particular, the new cultural centers for
different religions are being built, the state means are being divided to the institutions belonging to the three religions45.
Then the diplomat has written: The USA must also be interested in this successful example. Thus, Azerbaijan having the secular, tolerant and inclusive qualities plays a great role
for the region which has faced the crisis. During the discussions in the US Congress regarding the increasing threats in the region it would be useful to study the positive experience
of the countries such as Azerbaijan which promotes religious freedom and fights against
the extremism. Congress must support the tolerant and worldly friends of America, looking
through the harmony model of Azerbaijan religions as the working example it must call the
countries of the world to the application of this model46.
The geopolitical situation in the region forms the important component of the close ties
between our countries. It shows itself not only in the region, generally in the attitude to
Iran which is the main source of instability in the world. The expert on the Russian-Iranian
relations, the head of the Russia Center for the Study of Modern Iran Rajab Safarov commenting on the process in our region has said that one can also coordinate relations of the
official Baku to improve ties with the West, especially with the US the expansion of ties
with Iran. He has said that in order to solve the problem about the Iranian regime the official Washington must create the fifth column consisting of the Southern Azerbaijanians
and Azerbaijan Republic can help it in this work: Azerbaijanis has a state and it is very
favorable for the official Washington: to raise up rebellion in Tehran by the southern Azerbaijanis and to help them comprehensively, at last to promise them to join the Republic of
Azerbaijan. In their view, it will be a large, strong state situating in the area from the Caspian Sea to the Persian Gulf. Moreover, this government will be the second Turkish state in
the region after Turkey, in the Middle East47.
According to Safarovs words if we take into account the energy resources of Azerbaijan
and the size of the area where Azerbaijanis live in Iran, such state could become a strong

zzet . Azerbaycann msbet tecrbelerini yrenmek ABSH n faydal olard. Trend A, 6 yanvar, 2015.
Ibid
47 Memmedli . ABSH-n Cenubi Azerbaycanla bal plan var. Bizim yol qezeti, 12.6.2014.
45
46

235

American Journal of International Law, vol. 1 (January 2016), http://www.ajil.info

player in the international arena: All my words are the theory prepared by Americans and
this theory is used as a means of strong pressure by the US administration against Iran48.

Literature:
Shahda Milli Parkna Diqqet Artrlr, 525-ci Qezet, 25 May 2002.
About the measures of expansion of partnered relations between the Republic of Azerbaijan
and USA. The order of the President of Azerbaijan Republic. Baku city, September 2,
1997, 657. URL: http://e-qanun.az/files/framework/data/4/f_4250.htm
Aliyeva M. "Heyat Seviyyesi ve Yoxsulluq Problemi", Azerbaycan qtisadiyyat, Baku, 2000.
Bayraml N. Azerbaycanla elaqeler ABSH n strateji ehemiyyet dashyr. Yeni
Azerbaycan qezeti, 2014, 9 yanvar.
Bayramov V. Cenub qaz dehlizi layihesinin reallashmas strateji baxmdan mhm nem
dashyr. Xalq qezeti, 14.02.2015.
Brzezinski Z. The Grand Chessboard. American Primacy and Its Geostrategic Imperatives,
Basic Books, NY, 1997.
Caferli V. Azerbaycann Qerb Tehlksizlik sistemine inteqrasiyas: Azerbaycan-Nato
elaqeleri. Baku, 2011.
Cohen A. The Secretarys Daunting Agenda // The National Interest. June 4, 2012
http://nationalinterest.org/commentary/the-secretarysdaunting-agenda-7001.
Emiraslanov A. Azerbaycan Iqtisadiyyat ve Bazar Mnasibetleri, Baku, 1998.
From the conversation at the meeting with the President of the Republic of Azerbaijan
Heydar Aliyev and the representative delegation with the privite councillor of the President
of the United States and the Secretary of State, the ambassador Richard Morningstar Baku, December 16, 1998, "Heydar Aliyevs heritage" International Electronic Library, URL:
Http: //library.aliyev-heritage.org/ az/86084273.html.
Gurgen, E., H. Snoek, J. Craig, J. McHugh, I. Izvorski and R. Van Rooden Economic Reforms in Kazakhstan, Kyrgyz Republic, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan, International Monetary Fund Occasional Paper 183, 1999, Washington D.C.: IMF.
http://diaspora.gov.az/index.php?options=content&id=644
Inozemtsev V.L. The great politics in little places: Azerbaycann geosiyasi arenada gelecek
planlar nedir? // Azerbaijan Focus, 2009, 1(1), s. 59-70.
zzet . Azerbaycann msbet tecrbelerini yrenmek ABSH n faydal olard. Trend
A, 6 yanvar, 2015.
Madatova G. NATO partnership with Azerbaijan. Materials of the 9th Republic Students
Scientific-Practical Conference dedicated to the 20th anniversary of restoration of
independence of Azerbaijan Republic// (December 3, 2011). Baku, 2011.

48

Ibid

236

American Journal of International Law, vol. 1 (January 2016), http://www.ajil.info

Mammedov N. About the main directions of Azerbaijan foreign policy // Azerbaijan Focus,
2010, 2 (2), s. 17-50.
Mammedov N. Foreign policy: Realities and the prognosis. Baku, 2013, s. 262.
Memmedli . ABSH-n Cenubi Azerbaycanla bal plan var. Bizim yol qezeti, 12.6.2014.
Sevdimov T. The resons of crisis between Russia and Georgia. Bak, 2013. 506 s.
Sulejmanov E. Azerbaijan-World Bank relations after independence.// Materials of the 9th
Republic Students Scientific-Practical Conference dedicated to the 20th anniversary of
restoration of independence of Azerbaijan Republic// (December 3, 2011). Baku, 2011.
The President of Azerbaijan Republic Heydar Aliyevs statement about the mutual
protection and encouragement of capital invests and the joint statement about AmericaAzerbaijan relatons in the ceremony of signing the contract between the governments of
Azerbaijan Republic and USA/ Azerbaijan newspaper, August 3, 1997.
William C. Burns. Azerbaijan US relations. Goergtown University, Washington city, 18
September, 2009.
World Bank, World Development Indicators, 2001, Washington D.C.: World Bank.
., . . : XXI / , . : : . -, 2007, 303 .
/
Regnum, 2 2012. URL: http://www.regnum.su/news/1537836.html.
/ : .,
. , , 1994, 174 .
.. XXI ? // , 2011, 6, c. 17-27.
. ? / . . . ..
. .: , 2002, 352 .
. :
// ,
2011, 6, c. 157-167.
.
, 7 2012. URL:
http://kremlin.ru/acts/15256.

237

American Journal of International Law, vol. 1 (January 2016), http://www.ajil.info

AJIL Submissions
The American Journal of International Law (AJIL) invites submission of manuscripts on international law subjects. The Journal's coverage extends beyond public international law to closely related issues of global governance, transnational law, and national
or sub-state law. It generally does not publish manuscripts focused on purely private or
commercial law or on comparative or foreign law, including the internal law of the European Union. The Journal will not consider submissions whose content has been, or will be,
published before it appears in this journal.
The Journal typically receives over 400 submissions each year for lead articles, current
developments, or notes and comments from scholars and practitioners around the world.
All such submissions are considered by the co-editors in chief as soon as feasible upon receipt, with expedited attention paid to exclusive submissions and to manuscripts, including
candidates for notes, comments and current developments, that are less than 11,000
words. Submissions that are candidates for lead articles must receive, in addition to the
approval of the co-editors in chief, the approval of two members of the Board of Editors in
order to receive an offer of publication. (Where a submission presents a conflict of interest
for the co-editors in chief, as with respect to submissions written by full-time members of
the law faculty of New York University, the manuscript is handled by other members of the
Board of Editors. Where only one of the two co-editors in chief has such a conflict of interest, the manuscript is handled by the other.) The process for peer review may involve
members of the Board and outside scholars consulted for this purpose. This process ordinarily is double blind (meaning that the identity of the authors is unknown to the peer reviewers and vice versa). On occasion, this peer review process generates requests by the coeditors in chief for revision and resubmission. If ultimately rejected, manuscripts ordinarily are not resubmitted to the Journal.
The Journal is committed to publishing a diversity of authors, whether based in the United
States or abroad, and to covering a wide range of subjects and approaches. Suggestions for
topics for Journal symposia or Agora should be sent to law.ajil.admin@nyu.edu.
The Journal welcomes submissions for lead articles, notes, and comments by all authors.
Arrangements in relation to specific sections are as follows.

238

American Journal of International Law, vol. 1 (January 2016), http://www.ajil.info

Editorial Comments in the Journal are written by members of the Board of Editors.
Content for the Contemporary Practice of the United States Relating to International Law section of the Journal is generated by the editors of that section and does not
accept outside submissions.
The Recent Books on International Law section contains book reviews that are solicited by invitation of the editor, Richard Bilder. Suggestions for books to be reviewed and
topics that may be suitable for longer book review essays should be submitted through the
online form located on the AJIL website here.
The Journal strongly encourages authors and publishers to submit books for review in
hard copy to:
AJIL Book Review Office
2223 Massachusetts Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20008-2864, USA
The International Decisions section, edited by David Stewart, focuses on particularly
significant decisions concerning important issues of (or developments in) international
law. It consists of contributions that are mostly proposed to the editor by readers of
the Journal. Such proposals must concern a recent decision by an international court or
tribunal or the highest court in a domestic system (exceptionally, an upper-level court from
which there is practically no further possibility of appeal), in which the author had no involvement as advocate or party. Prospective authors should consult with Mr. Stewart in
advance of writing their proposals, since the Journal faces strict constraints on the number
of judicial and arbitral decisions which it can address in each issue and selections are based
on a desire to cover a diversity of topics and courts involving diverse authors from around
the world. Proposals for international decisions should be sent tostewartd@law.ajil.edu.
AJIL Unbound, a new online initiative, periodically issues open calls for short contributions on specified topics. Please visit http://www.ajil.info
to learn more.
Exclusive Submissions:
The Journal does not require exclusive submissions. Priority consideration will, however,
be accorded where the author states that the submission is exclusive for a specified period
of at least six weeks and commits to accept an offer of publication within the specified time
period. Authors should bear in mind that, as a professionally juried journal, the Journalis
rarely if ever able to make offers of publication in response to requests for expedited review
within the time limits typically fixed by other journals that have made offers of publication.

239

American Journal of International Law, vol. 1 (January 2016), http://www.ajil.info

Format and Style Guidelines:


All manuscripts should be double-spaced in 12-point Times New Roman type; these formatting requirements apply to all text, quotations, and footnotes. The maximum length for
lead articles is 30,000 words (including footnotes which should be complete and generally
in conformity with The Chicago Manual of Style (16th ed. 2010), The Bluebook: A Uniform System of Citation (19th ed., 2010) as well as the AJIL Style Guide.
Shorter pieces with less discursive footnotes, including submissions for lead articles, are
strongly encouraged and may receive more expedited review. The maximum length for
"Current Developments" and "Notes and Comments" submissions is 11,000 words. All
manuscripts should be accompanied by the author's CV (in a separate document and including a list of publications) as well as a short abstract of no more than 150 words.
Given the volume of submissions to the Journal, authors are strongly urged to strictly adhere to these guidelines; manuscripts that exceed the word limits indicated, are not generally in conformity with The Chicago Manual of Style, or whose footnotes are not in accord
with The Bluebook, (see above) may be rejected for these reasons alone.
Submissions should be in electronic form and should be transmitted as attachments to email messages addressed to ajil@ajil.info.
The Journal currently uses Word 2010/2007 but can convert manuscripts created in other
word processing programs. (In such cases, please specify the program used. Documents
must be in easily edited formats.) Please do not send manuscripts in PDF format.

240

You might also like