Professional Documents
Culture Documents
No
PARTICULARS
PAGE NO
CHAPTER I
1.
INTRODUCTION
2.
3.
10
4.
11
5.
REVIEW OF LITRATURE
12
6.
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
19
7.
21
CHAPTER II
8.
22
CHAPTER III
9.
ANALYSIS INTERPRETAITON
29
10.
HYPOTHESIS TESTING
81
CHAPTER IV
11.
FINDINGS
86
12.
SUGGESTION
88
13.
CONCLUSION
89
14.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
90
ANNEXURE
S.NO
LIST OF TABLE
PAGE
NO.
29
31
33
35
37
39
41
43
45
10
47
11
49
12
51
13
53
14
55
15
57
16
59
17
61
18
63
19
65
20
67
21
69
22
71
23
73
24
75
25
77
26
79
S.NO
LIST OF CHARTS
PAGE NO.
30
32
34
36
38
40
42
44
46
10
48
11
50
12
52
13
54
14
56
15
58
16
60
17
62
18
64
19
66
20
68
21
70
22
72
23
74
24
76
25
78
26
80
employees needed the personnel department can better plan its selection and other
things.
The main aspects of human resource development are job analysis
recruitment selection, training placement etc., human resource is partially
responsible for ensuring employee.
Satisfaction with job is important to keep. Human resources management
is in perspective and it aids other department. This project is limited to the study
of improve Employee morale through motivation. It is an attempt made by the
researcher to understand the level of employee welfare activities and motivation
among the employees in the Hyundai motor India ltd.
IMPORTANCE OF MOTIVATION
Letters of appreciation
Office with a Air condition
Membership of recreation clubs.
Use of company facilities for personal projects
Movie tickets
Vacation trips
More responsibility
Job rotation
Special Assignment
Training
HMIL has many awards in its bouquet. Sonata Embera won Executive Car
of The Year 2006 award by business Standard Motoring Magazine and Tucson
has been declared as SUV of The Year by NDTV Profit-Car & Bike awards
2006. The mid-size sedan Accent won two awards, Accent Petrol-No.1 Entry midsize car and Accent Diesel No.1 mid size diesel car by TNS. It was declared The
Star Company amongst unlisted companies by Business Standard in the year
2006. Getz got the coveted Car of the Year 2005 award twice over. It was
declared a winner by both Business Standard Motoring and CNBC-TV 18 Autocar
Auto awards.
MILESTONE OF HMI
May 1996: government approval
Dec
Sep
Mar
Oct
Jun
Jul
Jul
Mar
Aug
Sep
Oct
Oct
Dec
Feb
Hyundai motor India indulges the world class technology as the input for their
process, which contributes towards the making of Indias top quality cars, which
are carried out in various shops.
1. Press shop
2. Body shop
3. Paint shop
4. Engine shop
5. Transmission shop
6. Plastic shop
7. Assembly shop
8. Aluminum cast shop
9. Vendors
PRESS SHOP
In the press shop all the sheet metal panels, like the floor, doors, roof,
fenders, hood and tailgate of car are produced using equipment like blanking line,
tandem press line, transfer press line etc. the panels are stored in pallet sent to the
body shop for welding..
BODY SHOP
In body shop all the sheet metal panels and parts, which are supplied from
press shop and vendors respectively are converted into final shape of the car body.
Body manufacturing is divided into floor, side, build, moving, and complete. After
welding the complete body is sent to paint shop through conveyor skid for
painting.
PAINT SHOP
The car bodies which arrive here from the body shop are painted in
conveyors and controlled process. The purpose of painting is to give corrosion
resistance property and appearance value to the car body. the coat of paint must
give to the surface the desired color gloss, the abrasion and the corrosion
resistance.
When the appearance is beautiful, it raises the cars value. Paint is applied
on the car body by air spraying. The spraying is done with all spray guns and
accessories.
There are 14 shades of paint that can be applied with one single booth.
Fourteen stages of painting facility and 122 sets of spray accessories are available
to achieve better quality application.
ENGINE SHOP
In machine shop main components like cylinder block, cylinder head, cam
shaft, crank shaft and connecting rod, which need precision dimensional accuracy,
are machined using special purpose machines. Machine shop is getting raw
material from MIP and from vendors. Then these components are supplied to
Engine shop and transmission shop assembly of engine.
TRANSMISSION SHOP
Transmission shop consists of transmission assembly, heat treatment, and
clutch housing, sleeve, speed gears, shaft and diff gear lines and development.
Fully computerized Numerical controlled machines, fully automated geartesting machines to check critical dimensions and detect defects like nick, burr and
run out etc. Sophisticated transmission dynamo tester with built in high sensitive
sensors for measuring vibration and software to analyze performance.
PLASTIC SHOP
This shop consists of injection molding line and bumper painting line. In
injection molding line, crash pad, front and rear bumpers, luggage room side trims
left and right and all door trims are produced in the injection-molding machine and
then supplied to the assembly shop.
VENDORS
Except few parts produced in house, most of the car parts are produced
from vendor. Vendor development department coordinates with the vendors for the
development of different parts like fasteners all kinds of electrical items including
lamps, wiring harnesses etc.
ASSEMBLY SHOP:
The output from various shops reaches here where it is assembled to get the
complete car. The two major inputs to this shop come from paint shop, engine
shop and transmission shop. This shop is fully automated which again can deliver
25 UHP. The different accessories added to the painted body are wheels, the
engine, the glasses, the suspension system, the seating arrangement, the steering
system, etc,
3. REVIEW OF LITERATURE
Reinforcement Theory:
This theory is based on the work of skinner. Skinner believed that reinforcing
behavior would lead to its repetition. Consequently, behavior not reinforced was
less Likely to be repeated in order for companies to apply this theory with success,
effective reinforcers need to be identified.
creating a
theory
routes and paths and environmental relationships, which finally determine what
responses. if any the organism will finally make,
According to his theory there are five types of learning
Approach learning
Escape learning
Avoidance learning
Choice-point learning, and
Latent learning
All of which depend upon a certain structured process. Many variables such
as goal-oriented behavior, mediated by expectations, perception, representation
etc. play an equally important role in the motivational process. Thus, the emphasis
of Tolmans theoretical approach is the relationship between stimuli rather than
between stimulus and response.
BERNARD MALAMUD
CONCLUSION
Motivated employees are crucial to a companys success-this has never
been truer than today, when margins are thin (or nonexistent) and economic
recovery remains elusive. These hard bottom-line realities may also mean that
managers cant rely as much as they might have in the past on using financial
incentives to drive employee engagement. But, if the company has a solid
approach to talent management, a bad manager can overcome a great deal of
corporate mismanagement while creating enthusiasm and commitment within their
units. While individual manager cant control all leadership, they can still have a
profound influence on employee motivation.
The most important thing is to provide employees with a sense of security. One
in which they do not fear that their will be in jeopardy if their performance is not
perfect and one in which layoffs are considered an extreme last resort, not just
another for dealing with hard times.
But security is just the beginning. When handled properly, each of the above
mentioned practices will play a key role in supporting your employees goals for
achievement, equity, and camaraderie, and will enable them to retain the
enthusiasm they brought to their roles in the first place.
This study was conducted in Hyundai motor India Limited. The finding
will reflect executive of welfare activities in Hyundai motor India Limited.
The topic chosen for the study on Improve employee morale through
motivation, HMIL in Chennai Motivation act as a . Important tool for
Improve the employee morale and increase the productivity of the
organization. The survival of the company is fully depends upon its quality
human recourses, so the company give much concentration for maintaining the
employees morale in a work place, than only the company can achieve its entire
goal with economically.
The lazyness is a nature of the human being. So the company should take
necessary steps to avoid the lazyness during the working time.
Motivation in the from of monitary and non-monitary some respondents
are satisfied through monitary motivation and remaining employees are satisfied
only through non-monitary motivation the motivation helps to organization for
maintaining the cordial relationship between the employee and employer and also
it helps to maintaining the peaceful atmosphere in the organization.
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
Research methodology is a way to systematically solve the research
problems. It guides us how research is done scientifically. It consists of the
different steps that are generally adopted by the researcher to study this research
problem along with logic behind them.
Research Design:
The aim of present investigation is to study the improve employee morale
through motivation in HMIL.
Data collection:
In this study to collect the required data the researcher has used both
primary and secondary sources of information.
Complete enumeration of all the members of the sample, frame was
conducted with help of a detailed structured questionnaire schedule.
Sampling unit:The present investigation was carried out in the white collar employees of
Hyundai motor India Limited.
Sampling size:
Out of 1000 white collar employees, 100 of them are taken as sample, the
sampling technique applied for present study is stratified random sampling.
2. Chisquare test
3. Charts such as bar charts and pie chart
TABLE - 1
Distribution of respondents beside on age:
S.NO
Particular
Total No. of
Respondents
Percentage (%)
20-30
48
48
30-40
49
49
40-50
50 and above
Total
100
100
From the above table, it is clearly that the majority (49%) of the
respondents are in the age group of 30-40 years, followed by 48% respondents are
in the age group of 20-30 years, 2% respondents are in the age group of 40-50
years, and finally 1% respondent is in the age group of 50 and above.
CHART 1
Distribution of respondents beside on age:
TABLE 2
Distribution of respondents based on sex wise classification:
S.NO
Particular
Total No. of
Respondents
Percentage (%)
Male
85
85
Female
15
15
Total
100
100
From the above table, it is clearly that the majority 85% of the respondents
are male, and rest 15% of respondents are female.
CHART 2
Distribution of respondents beside on age:
TABLE - 3
S.NO
Particular
Total No. of
Respondents
Percentage (%)
Executive
37
37
Junior executive
63
63
Total
100
100
From the above table, it is clearly that the majority 63% junior executives
and rest 37% of respondents are executives.
CHART 3
Distribution of respondents based on cadre wise classification:
TABLE - 4
S.NO
Particular
Total No. of
Respondents
Percentage (%)
Admin
25
25
Production
25
25
Procurement
25
25
25
25
Total
100
100
CHART 4
Distribution of respondents based on department wise classification:-
TABLE 5
S.NO
Particular
Total No. of
Respondents
Percentage (%)
UG
63
63
PG
37
37
Total
100
100
From the above table It is clearly that the majority 63% of the respondents
are graduates, and rest 36% of respondents are post graduates.
CHART 5
Distribution of respondents based on education qualification:
TABLE 6
S.NO
Particular
Total No. of
Respondents
Percentage (%)
1-3 years
23
23
3-6 years
29
29
6-9 years
16
16
9-12 years
32
32
Total
100
100
From the above table, it is clearly that the majority 32% of the respondents
are having 9-12 years of experiences, followed by 29% respondents are having 3-6
years of experiences, 23% respondents are having 1-3 years of experiences, and
rest 16% respondents are having 6-9 years of experiences.
CHART 6
Distribution of respondents based on experience of executives:
TABLE 7
S.NO
Particular
Total No. of
Respondents
Percentage (%)
Strongly agree
37
37
Agree
63
63
Disagree
Strongly disagree
Total
100
100
The table source shows that about 63% of the respondents agree that they
proud of working in that organization, and the rest 37% of respondents of
strongly agree.
CHART 7
Distribution of respondents based on proud of work:
TABLE - 8
S.NO
Particular
Total No. of
Respondents
Percentage (%)
Strongly agree
50
50
Agree
44
44
Disagree
Strongly disagree
Total
100
100
From the above table, it is clear that the maximum 50% of the respondents
strongly agree on job rotation, followed by 44% of the respondents agree, and
the rest 6% of the disagree.
CHART 8
Distribution of respondents based on job rotation:
TABLE 9
S.NO
Particular
Total No. of
Respondents
Percentage (%)
Strongly agree
37
37
Agree
62
62
Disagree
Strongly disagree
Total
100
100
From the above table, maximum 62% of the respondents are in the category
of agree followed by category of 37% strongly agree and rest 1% falls in the
category of disagree.
CHART 9
Distribution of respondents based on qualification and experience:-
TABLE 10
S.NO
Particular
Total No. of
Respondents
Percentage (%)
Strongly agree
39
39
Agree
47
47
Disagree
11
11
Strongly disagree
Total
100
100
From the above table, maximum 47% of respondents are in the category of
agree, followed by 39% respondents are in the category of strongly agree,
category of 11% disagree, and rest 3% of respondents are in the category of
strongly disagree.
CHART 10
Distribution of respondents based welfare measures:
TABLE 11
S.NO
Particular
Total No. of
Respondents
Percentage (%)
Strongly agree
41
41
Agree
40
40
Disagree
14
14
Strongly disagree
Total
100
100
From the above table, maximum 41% of respondents are in the category of
strongly agree followed by 40% respondents are in the category of agree
category of 14% disagree, and rest 5% of respondents are in the category of
strongly disagree.
CHART 11
Distribution of respondents based on medical facility:
TABLE - 12
Distribution of respondents based on hospitalities:
S.NO
Particular
Total No. of
Respondents
Percentage (%)
Strongly agree
28
28
Agree
63
63
Disagree
Strongly disagree
Total
100
100
From the above table, maximum 63% of respondents are in the category of
agree, followed by 28% respondents are in the category of strongly agree,
category of 6% disagree, and rest 3% of respondents are in the category of
strongly disagree.
CHART 12
Distribution of respondents based on hospitalities:
TABLE - 13
Distribution of respondents based on relaxation:
S.NO
Particular
Total No. of
Respondents
Percentage (%)
Strongly agree
36
36
Agree
38
38
Disagree
18
18
Strongly disagree
Total
100
100
From the above table, maximum 38% of respondents are on the category of
agree, followed by 36% respondents are in the category of strongly agree,
category of 18% disagree, and rest 8% of respondents are in the category of
strongly disagree.
CHART 13
Distribution of respondents based on relaxation:
TABLE - 14
Distribution of respondents based on insurance policy and monetary funds:
S.NO
Particular
Total No. of
Respondents
Percentage (%)
Strongly agree
29
29
Agree
53
53
Disagree
12
12
Strongly disagree
Total
100
100
From the above table, maximum 53% of respondents are in the category of
agree, followed by 29% respondents are in the category of strongly agree
category of 12% disagree, and rest 6% of respondents are in the category of
strongly disagree.
CHART 14
Distribution of respondents based on insurance policy and monetary
funds:
TABLE - 15
Distribution of respondents based on recreational activities:
S.NO
Particular
Total No. of
Respondents
Percentage (%)
Strongly agree
34
34
Agree
45
45
Disagree
11
11
Strongly disagree
10
10
Total
100
100
From the above table, maximum 45% respondents are in the category of
agree, followed by 34% respondents are in the category of strongly agree,
category of 11% disagree, and rest 10% of respondents are in the category of
strongly disagree.
CHART 15
Distribution of respondents based on recreational activities:
TABLE - 16
Distribution of respondents based on productivity:
S.NO
Particular
Total No. of
Respondents
Percentage (%)
Strongly agree
41
41
Agree
53
53
Disagree
Strongly disagree
Total
100
100
From the above table, maximum 53% of respondents are in the category of
agree followed by 41% respondents are in the category of strongly agree, and
rest 6% of respondents are in the category of disagree.
CHART 16
Distribution of respondents based on productivity:
TABLE - 17
Distribution of respondents based on skills and knowledge:
S.NO
Particular
Total No. of
Respondents
Percentage (%)
Strongly agree
35
35
Agree
48
48
Disagree
12
12
Strongly disagree
Total
100
100
From the above table, maximum 48% of respondents are in the category of
agree followed by 35% respondents are in the category of strongly agree,
category of 12% disagree, and rest 5% of respondents are in the category of
strongly disagree.
CHART 17
Distribution of respondents based on skills and knowledge:
17
TABLE - 18
Distribution of respondents based on rewards and recognition:
S.NO
Particular
Total No. of
Respondents
Percentage (%)
Strongly agree
31
31
Agree
51
51
Disagree
13
13
Strongly disagree
Total
100
100
From the above table, maximum 51% of respondents are in the category of
agree followed by 31% respondents are in the category of strongly agree,
category of 13% disagree, and rest 5% of respondents are in the category of
strongly disagree.
CHART 18
Distribution of respondents based on rewards and recognition:
TABLE - 19
Distribution of respondents based on stress and conflicts:
S.NO
Particular
Total No. of
Respondents
Percentage (%)
Strongly agree
32
32
Agree
56
56
Disagree
11
11
Strongly disagree
Total
100
100
From the above table, maximum 56% of respondents are in the category of
agree, followed by 32% respondents are in the category of strongly agree,
category of 11% disagree, and rest 1% of respondents are in the category of
strongly disagree.
CHART 19
Distribution of respondents based on stress and conflicts:
19
TABLE - 20
Distribution of respondents based on work in a big organization:
S.NO
Particular
Total No. of
Respondents
Percentage (%)
Strongly agree
36
36
Agree
60
60
Disagree
Strongly disagree
Total
100
100
From the above table, maximum 60% respondents are in the category of
agree, followed by 36% respondents are in the category of strongly agree,
category of 2% disagree, and rest 2% of respondents are in the category of
strongly disagree.
CHART 20
Distribution of respondents based on work in a big organization:
TABLE - 21
Distribution of respondents based on opportunity for professional growth:
S.NO
Particular
Total No. of
Respondents
Percentage (%)
Strongly agree
30
30
Agree
59
59
Disagree
Strongly disagree
Total
100
100
From the above table, maximum 59% respondents are in the category of
agree followed by 30% respondents are in the category of strongly agree,
category of 8% disagree, and rest 3% of respondents are in the category of
strongly disagree.
CHART 21
Distribution of respondents based on opportunity for professional
growth:
TABLE 22
Distribution of respondents based on job security and job satisfaction:
S.NO
Particular
Total No. of
Respondents
Percentage (%)
Strongly agree
44
44
Agree
40
40
Disagree
Strongly disagree
Total
100
100
From the above table, maximum 44% respondents are in the category of
strongly agree, followed by 40% respondents are in the category of agree,
category of 9% disagree, and rest 7% of respondents are in the category of
strongly disagree.
CHART 22
Distribution of respondents based on job security and job satisfaction:
TABLE - 23
Distributions of respondents based on members treat friendly:
S.NO
Particular
Total No. of
Respondents
Percentage (%)
Strongly agree
29
29
Agree
55
55
Disagree
Strongly disagree
Total
100
100
From the above table, maximum 55% of respondents are in the category of
agree, followed by 29% respondents are in the category of strongly agree,
category at 9% disagree, and rest 7% of respondents are in the category of
strongly disagree.
CHART 23
Distributions of respondents based on members treat friendly:
TABLE - 24
Distribution of respondents based on emergency motivation:
S.NO
Particular
Total No. of
Respondents
Percentage (%)
Strongly agree
26
26
Agree
57
57
Disagree
11
11
Strongly disagree
Total
100
100
From the above table, maximum 57% respondents are in the category of
agree, followed by 26% respondents are in the category of strongly agree,
category of 11% disagree, and rest 6% respondents are in the category of
strongly disagree.
CHART 24
Distribution of respondents based on emergency motivation:
TABLE 25
S.NO
Particular
Total No. of
Respondents
Percentage (%)
Strongly agree
38
38
Agree
46
46
Disagree
10
10
Strongly disagree
Total
100
100
From the above table, maximum 46% respondents are in the category of
agree, followed by 38% respondents are in the category of strongly agree,
category of 10% disagree, and rest 6% of respondents are in the category of
strongly disagree.
CHART 25
Distribution of respondents based on working culture:
TABLE - 26
Distributions of respondents based on improve the morale.
S.NO
Particular
Total No. of
Respondents
Percentage (%)
Strongly agree
37
37
Agree
57
57
Disagree
Strongly disagree
Total
100
100
From the above table, maximum 57% respondents are in the category of
agree, followed by 37% respondents are in the category of strongly agree,
category of 4% disagree, and rest 2% respondents are in the category of strongly
disagree.
CHART 26
Distributions of respondents based on improve the morale.
FINDINGS
1. The majority of the respondents are found to be in the category of the age
group between 30-39 years.
2. Majority of the respondents are male
3. Almost the respondents are executives
4. The ratio of the respondents working in the various divisions is equal.
5. The majority of respondents are graduates.
6. The majority of the respondents are found to be experience of executives
between 9-12 years.
7. The majority of the respondents are agree to proud of work.
8. The majority of the respondents are strongly agree their job experience
9. The majority of the respondents are agree their qualification and
experience
10. The majority of the respondents are agree their welfare measures
11. The majority of the respondents are strongly agree their medical facility
12. The majority of the respondents are agree their hospitalities.
13. The majority of the respondents are agree their relaxation
14. The majority of the respondents are agree their insurance policy and
monetary funds.
15. The majority of the respondents are agree their recreational activities.
SUGGESTION
The workers are dis satisfied with the job security, so the organization has
to take necessary steps job security.
Most of the respondents are dis satisfied with the housing facilities and
transportation facilities. So the organization may arrange the facilities.
Most of the respondents are dis satisfied with the retirement benefit. So the
organization may improve the retirement benefit, according to the service
provided by the employee.
The company should provide required working environment to the
employees.
Job satisfaction of employee have a positive correlation with the
productivity of the company should try to enhance job satisfaction of its
employee.
CONSLUSION
Employee motivation is very essential for good organization health.
Motivation plays a vital role in HR department with functions of employee
performance.
HYPOTHESIS TESTING
1. Chi-square test
Age wise
20-30
30-40
Total
Gadre
wise
Executives
34
39
Junior
46
15
61
Executives
Total
51
49
100
0-E
(0-E)2
(O-E)2/E
19.89
-14.89
221.71
11.146
34
19.11
14.89
221.71.
11.601
46
31.11
14.89
221.71
4.819
15
29.89
-14.89
221.71
14.780
TOTAL
42.346
Degrees of freedom
( r-1 )
( c-1 )
( 2-1 )
(2-1 )
1*1
=1
Table value =3.841
The calculate value of chi-square is much greater than table value, hence the ( H
0 ) hypotheses is rejected.
Significance relationship between executives and age group.
2. Chi-square test
Years of
experience
And
1-3
3-6
6-9
9-12
Total
Qualifications
U .G
P .G
26
25
12
63
32
37
Total
26
30
12
32
100
O-E
(0-E)2
(O-E)2/E
26
16.38
9.62
92.54
5.649
25
18.9
6.1
37.21
1.968
12
7.56
4.44
19.71
1.642
11.1
6.1
37.21
32
11.84
20.16
406.42
7.442
12.700
29.401
Degrees of freedom
( r 1)
( c 1)
( 4 1)
( 2 1)
3*1
=3
The calculated value of chi-square is much greater than table value; hence the (H0)
hypothesesis is rejected
BIBILOGRAPHY
BOOKS
RESEARSH METHODOLOGY
By kothari &gupta
Websites
www.google.com
www.yahoo.com
CONSLUSION