Professional Documents
Culture Documents
918-935
TO CONFORM OR TO MAINTAIN
SELF-CONSISTENCY? HIKIKOMORI RISK
IN JAPAN AND THE DEVIATION FROM
SEEKING HARMONY
Vinai Norasakkunkit
Gonzaga University
Yukiko Uchida
Kyoto University
There is an increasing number of youth in Japan who are dropping out of society
and isolating themselves in their bedrooms from years to decades at a time. These
so-called hikikomori or social isolates have been described by Japanese clinicians
as suffering most commonly from an autism spectrum disorder. However, such
claims come out of examining biased samples of hikikomori who have already
been referred to mental health professionals. Alternatively, we argue that the tendency for hikikomori represents an increasing marginalization of Japanese youth
who are consciously rejecting dominant cultural values of harmony-seeking and
consequently deviating in their motivation to conform to others behaviors. The
current study tests for this alternative argument for hikikomori tendencies. One
hundred ninety-five participants were recruited from Japanese universities and
divided into high risk vs. low risk of becoming hikikomori according to an instrument that measures such risks. As expected, high risk students shared similar
social perceptions about pervasive values in their society as low risk students,
thereby ruling out deficits in social perception as being associated with hikikomori risk. Instead, high risk students were not motivated to conform to others
behaviors relative to low risk students and this difference was fully mediated by
differences in preferred levels of harmony-seeking. Furthermore, high risk students scored lower on both local identity and global identity relative to low risk
students, thereby reifying their marginalized identity in Japanese society.
This study was supported by grants from the Kokoro Research Center, Kyoto
University and JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number 2109215.
The authors would like to thank Keiko Ishii and Yuri Yano for their help with data
collection.
Address correspondence to Vinai Norasakkunkit at the Department of Psychology,
Gonzaga University, 502 East Boone Avenue, Spokane, WA 99258-0102; E-mail:
vinainor@me.com.
2014 Guilford Publications, Inc.
918
919
You cant pinpoint the reason, but you can pinpoint the context: its Japan. In Japan you have to be like other people, and if
you arent, you have a sense of loss, of shame. So you disappear.
Sadatsugu Kudo, Director of Youth Support Center
which fields about 1,500 calls a year from families
seeking help about their hikikomori children.
(Time Magazine, August 28, 2000)
920
921
Moreover, in the first epidemiological study conducted on hikikomori that was as close to a nation-wide random sample as possible,
Koyama and colleagues (2010) conducted a face-to-face household
survey, including a structured diagnostic interview, by randomly
picking households and interviewing 4,134 individuals. They confirmed a hikikomori lifetime prevalence rate of 1.2% in their nationwide sample. Among these hikikomori individuals, the researchers
found that only half suffered from a DSM-IV diagnosis. However,
and more importantly, there was no particular diagnosis that was
systematically associated with hikikomori. For the remaining half of
hikikomori individuals, no DSM diagnosis could even be assigned.
Thus, the researchers concluded that any DSM diagnosis was an
epiphenomenon to hikikomori at best and that hikikomori is rather a
psychopathology characterized by impaired motivation (p. 72).
922
spaces in the Japanese labor market (see also Brinton, 2011). Since
many youth are prevented from participating in mainstream Japanese society while very little, if any, legitimately recognized alternative life course to success is available to them, a sense of anomie
ensues. Consequently, many Japanese youth may not see the benefit
of internalizing a motivational style that is oriented toward conformity for the sake of harmony. Nor have they become globalized
by adopting the values of another culture (e.g., Western culture).
Hence, they may be rejecting mainstream cultural values without
switching to other values in a coherent way. Thus any motivation
to act in culturally incongruent ways may be an outcome of their
actual or anticipated marginalization rather than a cause of it.
After having ruled out any systematic link between hikikomori
and any DSM diagnosis, Koyama and colleagues (2010) boldly concluded that hikikomori is a psychopathology of impaired motivation.
More recently, Norasakkunkit and colleagues (2012) have argued
that hikikomori is more of a social pathology than a psychopathology
since the cause of the pathology lies more in the structural aspects
of society, which limit the institutional means to accomplishing
cultural goals for many Japanese youth (see Toivonent, Norasakkunkit, & Uchida, 2011). Since impaired motivation implies a deficit
in capacity as opposed to a conscious choice, Norasakkunkit and
colleagues have argued that the motivation among hikikomori is not
necessarily impaired but rather deviant from the Japanese cultural
mandate toward conformity for the sake of harmony. Yet, because
the social reality in Japan limits multiple paths to cultural success,
at least relative to other postindustrialized societies, such deviant values and motivational styles may actually be dysfunctional
and distressing for those with such tendencies, even to the point of
wanting to avoid all interactions with the outside world.
923
924
thermore, the difference between high risk and low risk students
in motivation to conform under conditions of social proof was expected to be mediated by levels of harmony seeking values at the
ideal self level.
Finally, according to the acculturation and adaptation model by
Berry and Sam (1997), marginalized individuals should be disidentifying with their own heritage culture as well as that of their host
culture. Since the social pathology argument suggests that hikikomori individuals are marginalized in part because they are rejecting
mainstream cultural values without necessarily becoming globalized by adopting the values of another culture (e.g., Western culture), we have chosen to adapt the Barry and Sam model by measuring local identity and global identify. It was expected that high
risk students will score lower on both local identity and global identity relative to low risk students, thereby reifying the marginalized
identities of high risk students (see Figure 1).
METHOD
PARTICIPANTS
Since there are relatively few university students who score high
on the marginalization risk factor scale, participants were recruited
in three phases in order to maximize sample size. Unfortunately,
not all the measures could be included in phase two and phase
three since some of the measures relevant to this study were simply
tagged onto other studies during those phases. The specific measures that were excluded in each phase, if any, are mentioned in
the Materials section below. In phase one, 119 participants were recruited from Kyoto University (63 males, 53 females, 3 unspecified).
In phase two, another 22 participants were recruited from Kyoto
University again (11 males, 11 females). In phase 3, 54 participants
were recruited from Kobe University (33 males, 21 females). The age
ranged from 18 to 28 with an average age of 20.24 (SD = 1.56). All
participants were asked to complete a survey packet and received a
$10 gift card for participating in this study.
MEASURES
Hikikomori Risk Factor Scale (HRFS). The HRFS (Uchida & Norasakkunkit, under review) was developed by compiling common
925
attitudes and values held by marginalized Japanese youth, including hikikomori, according to other investigators on the subject.
These items used a 7-point Likert scale. Initial analyses identified 27
meaningful survey items that measured the risk of becoming marginalized in modern Japan. Furthermore, three distinct risk factors
emerged in the initial exploratory factor analysis. Factor 1 was labeled Freeter Lifestyle Preference, which refers to the tendency of
becoming a Freeter who consciously chooses not to work despite
opportunities and job availabilities. An example of an item from
this factor is, After graduation, if there is something at work that I
cannot tolerate, it is better to not force myself and instead just quit.
The next factor that emerged, Factor 2, has to do with a Lack of Self
Competence (i.e., not feeling competent in accomplishing interdependent cultural tasks). An example of an item from this factor is,
My social skills are low, and I am not good at relating to others.
Factor 3 has to do with an Unclear Ambition for the Future (i.e.,
having unclear or unrealistic goals for what they want to do in the
future). An example of an item from this factor is, I dont quite
know what I want to do in the future.
Although these factors are relatively distinct from each other, a
reliability analysis also revealed that an overall score, combining all
the items, could be calculated to represent overall risk of becoming
926
marginalized. In the current data, the reliability for the items that
make up the overall risk score was alpha = .81.
Norasakkunkit & Uchida (2010) found that university students
consistently score lower on all three factors as well as on the overall score relative to a nationwide sample of occupationally inactive
youth or the so-called NEETs (Not in Employment, Education, or
Training) and a small sample of those suffering from hikikomori. Furthermore, Norasakkunkit, Toivonen, and Uchida (2011) found that in
January of 2011, in a sample of fourth-year Kyoto University students
(n = 21), about 80% of students were searching for or had already secured a long-term employment position three months prior to their
graduation. However, these students were considered to be at low
risk of potentially being marginalized as NEETs or hikikomori according to HRFS. In contrast, in a sample of fourth year Kyoto University
students who were at high risk of being marginalized according to
HRFS (n = 5), the rate of searching for a job or securing a long-term
employment position three months prior to graduation was 0%.
This measure was included in all three phases of data collection.
Willingness to Comply (WTC). The WTC (Cialdini et al., 1999) is a
marketing survey that comes in two versions. Participants are asked
how much they were willing to comply to completing a marketing
survey on a scale from 0 (very low likelihood) to 8 (very high likelihood). One version of the survey asked the participants to rate their
likelihood of complying to a request assuming that the majority of
their classmates have already complied (i.e., conformity or social
proof version). The other version of this survey asked participants to
rate their likelihood of complying to the request assuming that they
have complied to a similar survey in the past (commitment consistency version). This measure was included in all three phases of data
collection.
Local-Global Identity Scale. The Local-Global Identity Scale (Zhang
& Khare, 2009) is a 19-item scale to measure local-global identity.
Each item is on a 7-point scale (1 = strongly disagree; 7 = strongly
agree). Nine items constitute the global identity scale (alpha = .74)
and 10 items constitute the local identity scale (alpha = .74). The
mean score for each scale was computed separately. This measure
was included in phase 1 data collection only.
Measure of Harmony-Seeking at the Ideal Self, Self, and Perceived Consensus Levels (Hashimoto & Yamagishi, 2013). The harmony-seeking
measure is a subscale of a Japanese collectivism self-report instru-
927
RESULTS
To test the hypothesis that differences in the level of preferred
harmony-seeking values, rather than deficits in social perception,
are associated with risk, preferred values were operationalized as
harmony-seeking values at the ideal self level. Also any differences
between high-risk students and low-risk students in levels of perceived consensus of harmony-seeking values may possibly indicate
deficits associated with social perception, which can index an autism spectrum disorder. Relevant correlations between all measures
are indicated in Table 1. Relevant descriptive and independent samples t-test statistics are indicated in Table 2.
As expected, independent samples t-tests revealed that there was
no difference between low-risk and high-risk students in the per-
928
1. HRFS
2. Harmony seeking self level
3. Harmony seeking ideal self level
4. Harmony seeking perceived consensus
level
5. Mean local identity
6. Mean global identity
.27**
.33***
.15
.28**
.16
.65***
.12
.37***
.21*
.03
.28**
.04
.007
.19*
.37***
-
929
Sample
(Risk)
SD
df
2.96
139
3.94
139
Low
105
4.76
.82
High
36
4.27
.93
Low
105
5.25
.87
High
36
4.53
1.14
<.001
Low
91
5.29
.72
ns
High
28
5.38
.60
Low
143
3.80
3.35
High
52
3.69
3.13
Low
91
3.97
.73
High
28
3.39
.64
Low
91
3.81
.84
High
28
3.46
.81
<.01
ns
3.83
.73
<.001
.64
1.97
117
=.05
(i.e., harmony seeking at the ideal self level) with high risk students
being significantly lower than that of low risk students.
To test the hypothesis that highrisk students have a motivational
style that deviates from conformity while lowrisk students will
be oriented toward conformity, the responses to WTC scale were
submitted to a 2 (risk) by 2 (compliance condition) ANOVA. The
expected interaction was found, as indicated by F (1,191) = 5.84,
p = .02 (see Figure 2). However, comparing willingness to comply
between low-risk and high-risk students in each compliance condition suggests that high-risk students were not more motivated to
comply by commitment consistency than were low-risk students.
As was expected, the difference between a low-risk and high-risk
student lied in willingness to comply under the social proof condition, as indicated by t(106) = 2.14, p < .04. In a moderated regression
analysis, the interaction term between HRFS scores and compliance
conditions was also significant, as indicated by = .06, p < .05, although simple slope analyses did not reveal significant findings.
Overall, these findings suggests that, relative to low-risk students,
the motivation style of high-risk students was more about deviating
from the culturally dominant motivation process (i.e., conforming
to others behaviors) and less about being motivated by something
else, like commitment consistency.
Furthermore, as expected, the difference between low-risk and
high-risk students in willingness to comply under conditions of
social proof was fully mediated by harmony seeking at the ideal
930
self level (see Figure 3 for relevant statistics). Thus, the difference
in motivation to conform to others behaviors between high risk
and low risk students can be accounted for by the difference in how
much low-risk students and high-risk students want to ideally be
oriented toward harmony seeking. Importantly, high-risk students
do not want to be oriented toward harmony seeking as much as the
low-risk students do.
Finally, as expected, high-risk students scored lower than lowrisk students on both local identity and global identity (see Table 2
for relevant means). However, once HRFS was regressed on global
identity and local identity, only local identity and not global identity significantly and inversely predicted HRFS scores, as indicated
by = -.26, p = .007. This finding suggests that high-risk students
have disidentified with both their heritage culture and global culture relative to the low-risk students, but the crucial predictor of
hikikomori risk among these predictors is local identity. Applying
Berry and Sams (1997) acculturation model to this finding suggests
that hikikomori risk can reasonably be associated with having a marginalized identity.
DISCUSSION
In the current study, all the hypotheses were supported, thereby
suggesting that the atypical motivation style associated with hikikomori tendencies seem to be guided by culturally-deviant preferred
values and a marginalized identity. Specifically, high-risk students
931
932
It is also worth mentioning that the fact that hikikomori is considered a culture-bound syndrome does not preclude cases of hikikomori being documented in other cultures, just as other culture-bound
syndromes in Japan like taijinkyofosho can be found in the United
States (Norasakkunkit, Kitayama, & Uchida, 2012) or cases of anorexia which do not involve body image concerns previously common in Hong Kong have also been documented in Western cultures
(Watters, 2010). Indeed, cases of hikikomori have been documented in
South Korea, Oman, and Spain (Kato et al., 2012). Therefore, hikikomori is not a culture-bound syndrome in the most literal sense. Yet,
it can be reasonably argued that what makes a syndrome culturebound is not its complete absence in other cultures but its relative
prevalence as well as the prevalence of the conditions that give rise
to and sustain the syndrome in a culture.
For example, maintaining a seniority system, as well as maintaining a relatively impermeable long-term labor market due to rigid
hiring practices in the midst of postindustrial pressures to do precisely the opposite, may be preventing many young Japanese from
joining mainstream society because they have to bear the brunt of
the social cost of these globally uncompetitive institutional practices (Toivonen, Norasakkunkit, & Uchida, 2011).
Another condition associated with hikikomori may be related to
how Japanese parents seem to be much more willing than American parents to financially and logistically fully support their adult
children well in to middle age without necessarily seeking external
interventions (Kawanishi, 2009). Furthermore, public aid in Japan
is only made available if self-help and family support are not sufficient (Vij, 2007).
These more or less culture-specific conditions may represent
some of the conditions that give rise to and sustain hikikomori as
a syndrome or a more pervasive social problem. These conditions
speak to why specific manifestations of a larger issue become culture-bound. Having said that, the larger issue may be less culturebound. For example, hikikomori may simply be one manifestation of
how many young people are finding it difficult to cope with modern
society and with increased competitiveness due to globalization. In
the United Kingdom or the United States, the same issue may manifest in terms of increased homeless youth (Saito, 2013), for example.
Therefore, to say that hikikomori primarily stems from a neurological
or psychological disorder would be like saying that homelessness
is primarily caused by mental disabilities. While there are certainly
933
cases in which mental health issues trigger hikikomori or homelessness, the vast majority of cases may be stemming from structural
forces in society, such as unequal opportunities to access stable jobs,
that are marginalizing such individuals or demotivating them from
embracing mainstream cultural values and goals.
Even though a mental disability may not be the cause of hikikomori, there are few people, if any, who would dispute the fact that
hikikomori is dysfunctional and probably distressing as well. Indeed,
mild depression is often found among those suffering from hikikomori (Koyama et al., 2010; Norasakkunkit & Uchida, 2010) but it
is very plausible that such distress and dysfunction are the consequences of leading a hikikomori lifestyle rather than a cause of hikikomori itself. In fact, Kato and his colleagues (2011) have found that
Japanese young people who are trying to cope with modern society
are increasingly suffering from what they call modern-type depression, which is characterized by a shift in values form collectivism
to individualism, distress and reluctance to accept prevailing social
norms, a vague sense of omnipotence, and avoidance of effort and
strenuous work. The fact that these tendencies are associated with
depression suggest that perhaps deviating from prevailing cultural
norms and values can be distressing in itself, even if those engaging
in such behaviors personally prefer to deviate from such norms
and values.
One limitation of this study was the reliance on an analog sample
rather than on actual people suffering from hikikomori. In the current study, however, there were logistic issues with recruiting real
people suffering from hikikomori to participate in a social psychological study. Future research should try to obtain data on harmony-seeking tendencies at the self level, the ideal self level, and the
perceived consensus level from a nonclinical sample of those who
are suffering from real hikikomori. The second limitation of the study
was that not every relevant measure was included in each phase of
data collection. This may have limited the power of the findings
from analyses which included measures from phase one data collection only. Therefore, any analysis that include harmony seeking
at the perceived self level, local identity, or global identity was an
analysis performed with the participants from phase one data collection only.
In conclusion, the current study provided support for the idea
that hikikomori risk is associated with a deviation or possibly an outright rejection of mainstream cultural values of harmony seeking
934
REFERENCES
Berry, J. W., & Sam, D. (1997). Acculturation and adaptation. In J. W. Berry, M. H.
Segall, & C. Kagitcibasi (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology (Vol. 3, pp.
291326). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Brinton, M. (2011). Lost in transition: Youth, work, and instability in postindustrial Japan.
New York: Cambridge University Press.
Cialdini, R. B., Wosinska, W., Barrett, D. W., Butner, J., & Gornik-Durose, M. (1999).
Compliance with a request in two cultures: The differential influence of social
proof and commitment/consistency on collectivists and individualists. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 12421253.
Genda, Y. (2005). A nagging sense of job insecurity: the new reality facing Japanese youth.
Tokyo: International House of Japan, Inc.
Hashimoto, H., Ohashi, K., & Yamagishi, T. (2011, January). Common beliefs, behaving
by anticipating others response, and self-sustaining mechanism of Japanese interdependence. Presented at the 12th annual meeting of the Society for Personality
and Social Psychology, San Antonio, Texas, USA.
Hashimoto, H., & Yamagishi, T. (2013). Two faces of interdependence: Harmony
seeking and rejection avoidance. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 16, 142151.
Kato, T. A., Shinfuku, N., Fujisawa, D., Tateno, M., Ishida, T., Akiyama, T. et al. (2011).
Introducing the concept of modern depression in Japan; An international case
vignette survey. Journal of Affective Disorders, 135, 6676.
Kato, T. A., Tateno, M., Shinfuku, N., Fujisawa, D., Teo, A. R., Sartorius, N. et al.
(2012). Does the hikikomori syndrome of social withdrawal exist outside Japan? A preliminary international investigation. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric
Epidemiology, 47, 10611075.
Kawanishi, Y. (2009). Mental health challenges facing contemporary Japanese society: The
Lonely People. Kent, UK: Global Oriental Ltd.
Kosugi, R. (2008). Escape from work: Freelancing youth and challenge to corporate Japan.
Melbourne: Trans Pacific Press.
Koyama, A., Miyake, Y., Kawakami, N., Tsuchiya, M., Tachimori, H., & Takeshima, T.
(2010). Lifetime prevalence, psychiatric comorbidity and demographic correlates of hikikomori in a community population in Japan. Psychiatry Research,
176, 6974.
935
Norasakkunkit, V., Kitayama, S., & Uchida, Y. (2012). Social anxiety and holistic cognition: Self-focused social anxiety in the U.S. and other-focused social anxiety
in Japan. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 43(5), 742-757.
Norasakkunkit, V, Toivonen, T., & Uchida, Y. (2011, October 28). Emerging adulthood
and exploration in Japan: Better strategically late than dangerously early? Fifth Conference on Emerging Adulthood, Providence, RI, USA.
Norasakkunkit, V., & Uchida, Y. (June 29, 2010). A social/cultural psychological perspective on NEET/hikikomori: Implications for self, motivation, rehabilitation, and differentiation. Kokoro Research Center, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Norasakkunkit, V., & Uchida, Y. (2011). Psychological consequences of post-industrial anomie on self and motivation among Japanese youth. Journal of Social
Issues, 67, 774786.
Norasakkunkit, V. & Uchida, Y., (2012). Marginalized Japanese youth in post-industrial Japan: Motivational patterns, self-perceptions, and the structural foundations of shifting values. In G. Trommsdorff & X. Chen (Eds.), Values, religion,
and culture in adolescent development (pp. 211-234). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Norasakkunkit, V., Uchida, Y., & Toivonen, T. (2012). Caught between culture, society, and globalization: Youth marginalization in post-industrial Japan. Social
and Personality Psychology Compass, 6(5), 361378.
Saito, K. (2010) Guideline of assessment and support for Hikikomori. Ministry
of Helath, Labour, and Welfare. http://www.ncgmkohnodai.go.jp/pdf/
jidouseishin/22ncgm_hikikomori.pdf
Saito, T. (1998). Shakaiteki Hikikomori: Owaranai Shishunki (Social withdrawal: Unending
adolescence). Tokyo: PHP Shuppan.
Saito, T. (2013). Hikikomori: Adolescence without end. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Sakai, M., Horikawa, H., Nonaka, S., Matsumoto, M., Hirakawa, S., & NPO KHJ Parents Association (2011). Survey report on Hikikomori Vol.8. Hikikomori and
developmental issues. Tokushima Univ.
Tager-Flusberg, H. (2007). Evaluating the theory of mind hypothesis of autism. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 316320.
Toivonen, T., Norasakkunkit, V., & Uchida, Y. (2011). Unable to conform, unwilling to
rebel? Youth, culture and motivation in globalizing Japan. Frontiers in Cultural
Psychology, 2, 19.
Tomassello, M. (1999). Cultural origins of human cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard
University Press.
Uchida, Y., & Norasakkunkit, V. (under review). NEET and Hikikomori spectrum: A
socio-cultural marginalization.
Vij, R. (2007) Japanese modernity and welfare. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
Watters, E. (2010). Crazy like us: The globalization of the American psyche. New York:
Free Press.
Zhang, Y., & Khare, A. (2009). The impact of accessible identities on the evaluation of
global versus local products. Journal of Consumer Research, 36, 524537.
Zielenziger, M. (2006). Shutting out the sun: How Japan created its own lost generation.
New York: Nan A. Talese.
Copyright of Journal of Social & Clinical Psychology is the property of Guilford Publications
Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv
without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print,
download, or email articles for individual use.