Professional Documents
Culture Documents
: 1. melissa
GROUP
EXPERIMENT
DATE PERFORMED
SEMESTER
PROGRAMME / CODE
SUBMIT TO
: EH 220 1
: 6 SOAPS AND DETERGENT
:
:1
: EH220
: WAN HAMDAH BINTI WAN AMRAN
No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Title
Abstract/Summary
Introduction
Aims
Theory
Apparatus
Methodology/Procedure
Results
Calculations
Discussion
Conclusion
Recommendations
Reference / Appendix
TOTAL MARKS
Remarks:
Checked by :
--------------------------Date :
1.1 ABSTRACT
Marks
1.2 INTRODUCTION
1.3 OBJECTIVE
1. To prepare soap and compare its properties to that of a synthetics detergent.
1.4 THEORY
Soap is the salt of weak acid. Most organic acids are weak acids. Consequently,
hydrolysis occurs to some extent when soap dissolves in water. Soap solutions tent to be
slightly alkaline (basic) due to partial hydrolysis of the acid.
The cleansing action of soaps results from two effects. Soaps are wetting agents that
reduce the surface tension of water, allowing the water molecules to encounter the dirty
object. They are also emulsifying agents. Dirt frequently consists of a grease or oil
along with other organic species. In general, organic compounds are nonpolar. Water is
a polar species. These two substances will not dissolve in each other because of their
dissimilar characteristics (the Like Dissolve Like rule). Soaps cross the boundary
between polar and nonpolar because they contain a polar hydrophobic (water-hating)
end and a polar hydrophilic (water-loving) end.
Because soaps have both polar and nonpolar region in the molecule, they are soluble in
both polar and nonpolar species. The hydrophobic (nonpolar) portion of soap is soluble
in nonpolar compound like grease and oils. The hydrophilic (polar) end dissolves in
water. Soap molecules surround the grease and oils and break them up into microscopic
droplets can remain suspended in water. These suspended microscopic droplets are
called micelles. Micelles contain very small amounts of oil or grease in their center. Thus
the oil or grease has been dissolved in water forming an emulsion, one form of a
suspension in water.
Water supplies in certain areas are acidic as a result of acid rain or pollution, or hard
due to the dissolved mineral content. Both acidic and hard water reduce the cleansing
action of soap. Soap is the salt of a weak acid. In the presence of a stronger acid, the
sodium salt is converted to an insoluble organic acid.
Hard water contains dissolved Ca2+, Mg2+ and Fe3+ ions from the minerals that the water
passes over. Normally, soaps made from sodium and potassium fatty acid salts are
soluble in water. However, in the presence of these metal ions, the Na+ and K+ soluble
salts convert to insoluble Ca2+, Mg2+ and Fe3+ salts.
In either acidic or hard water, the soluble soaps form insoluble salts that becomes a
scummy ring on bathtubs and black areas on shirt collars. The cleansing ability of soap
is reduces because soap molecules are removed from the solution. There are several
techniques used to circumvent the problems generated by hard water. Water can be
softened via removing hard water ions from solution using ion exchange techniques or
by adding water softening agents, such as sodium phosphate (Na3PO4) or sodium
carbonate (Na2CO3). Water softening agents react with the Ca2+, Mg2+ and Fe3+ by
removing them from water and preventing the reaction of these ions with soap.
Thus Syndets was design to overcome the soap problem with hard water. Syndets
differ from soaps in that the nonpolar fatty acids groups are replaced with alkyl or aryl
sulfonic acids (ROSO3H). The alkyl or aryl sulfonic acids have long chains of carbon
atoms giving the hydrophobic (nonpolar) end. The salt of the sulfonic acid (sulfonate)
group forms the hydrophilic end of the molecule. The difference in polar groups is one of
the key distinctions between soap and the synthetic detergent. Syndets from micelles
and cleanse in the same manner as soaps.
Because sulfonic acid is a stronger acid than carboxylic acids, Syndets do not precipitate
in acidic solutions. Furthermore, alkyl and aryl sulfonates do not form insoluble salts in
the presence of the typical hard water ions. Thus, synthetic detergents remain soluble in
both acidic and hard water.
1.5 APPARATUS
Apparatus
Materials
Vegetable oil
Ethanol
Beaker
Sodium hydroxide
Test tubes
Cloth strips
Measuring cylinder
Mineral oil
Glass rod
1% CaCl2 solution
pH meter electronic
1% MgCl2 solution
1% FeCl2 solution
Tomato sauce
Distilled water
and the mass is recorded o nearest 0.001 and the mass of the soap is determined by
difference and the mass is recorded.
3. Three test tubes are labeled as test tube 1, 2 and 3. 4 drops of mineral oil are
added to each test tube. 5 mL of distilled water is added to test tube 1. 5 mL of
stock soap solution is added to test tube 2. 5 mL of stock synthetic detergent is
added to test tube 3.
4. Each solution is mixed by shaking and is let to stand for three to five minutes. The
solutions, if any, emulsifies the oil by forming a single layer are noted.
5. The mixtures are poured into the Waste Container. The three test tubes are
cleaned and dried.
6. Three test tubes are labeled as test tube 1, 2 and 3. 2 mL of stock soap solution
is placed in each of the three test tubes. 2 mL of 1% CaCl2 solution is added to
test tube 1. 2 mL of 1% MgCl2 solution is added to test tube 2. 2 mL of 1% FeCl2
solutions is added to test tube 3. Each test tube is shaken to mix the solutions.
The observation is recorded.
7. 4 drops of mineral oil are added to each of the test tubes in step 6. Each test
tubes are shaken to mix the solutions and the solutions are let to stand for three
five minutes. The solutions, if any, emulsifies the oil by forming a single layer are
noted.
9. The solutions, if any, emulsifies the oil by forming a single layer are noted.
10. The mixture is poured into the Waste Container. The test tube is cleaned and
dried.
11. 5 mL of stock solutions and 5 mL of stock detergent solution are placed in a clean
test tube and in a second test tube respectively. 1 M HCl one drop is added at a
time to both solutions until the pH in each test tube is equal to 2. (pH paper is
used to measure). The number of drops of acid added is counted to each mixture.
12. 1 drop of mineral oil is added to each test tube in step 11. Each test tube is
shaken to mix the solution.
1. Three beakers are cleaned, dried and labeled. 20 mL of stock soap solution (from
step 1 in section 3.4.3.) is placed in the 1st beaker. 20 mL of stock detergent
solution (from step 2 in section 6.4.4) is placed in the 2 nd beaker. 20 mL of the
commercial liquid Dynamo is placed.
2. Three cloth test strips that have been soaked in tomato sauce are obtained and
one strip is placed in each of the beakers. One cloth strip is placed in beaker 1
(from above), one cloth strip is placed in beaker 2, and one cloth strip is placed in
beaker 3. The solution is stirred repeatedly with stirring rod for 5 minutes.
3. The cloth strips are removed from the soap and detergent solution and the
excess water is squeezed out. Each cloth strip is compared visually to determine
their relative cleanliness. The observation is recorded.
1.7 RESULTS
1.7.1 Soap Preparation
37.697
74.24
36.543
Dynamo
pH of soap solution
12
pH of synthetics detergent
solution
Table of Emulsification
System
Emulsification occurred
Distilled water
No
Soap
Yes
Detergent
Yes
System
CaCl2
MgCl2
FeCl2
Acidic (HCl)
Yes
(white
precipitate)
No
No
(heterogeneus
)
Yes
(homogeneus)
1.8 CALCULATIONS
1.9 DISCUSSIONS
1.10 CONCLUSIONS
In the experiment, we prepared soap by using the vegetables oil, ethanol and sodium
hydroxide that continuously stirred during heating process until only bubbles remain. After
the process we manage to recover 36.543 g of soap that having pH value of 12. The soap is
then, compared with the synthetic detergent (dynamo) for their cleansing ability. Throughout
the experiment, we conclude that the cleansing abilities of the soap that we prepared are
less effective than the synthetic detergent which is not leaving any precipitate after addition
of Hard water and acid.
1.11 RECOMMENDATIONS
1. We must avoid from make a parallax error for most of the measured. For example
when taking the reading from measuring cylinder or dropper calibration. This error
can be reduced by always ensuring that readings are always made at eye level and
that the same person taking the readings is constant as judgment varies with each
person.
2. We must take each measurement as sharply as possible so that the final result being
better.
3. This lab could be improved by improving the method of drying volumetric flask and
beaker before filling it with any solution that used in this experiment. The glassware
could be dried by small amount of acetone. Any acetone could be removed by
evaporation.
4. To get the better result or weight of soap that can be recovered, all of the soap must
be dried and not being waste even a little because it will affect the calculation in this
experiment.
1.12 REFERENCES
1.13 APPENDIX