Table 1.

CATEGORYI
Effectiveness/

Performance Measures
DEFINITION

The extent to which actual performance compares with targeted performance. Quality

The degree to which objectives are achieved and the extent to which targeted proble

Efficiency
The
extent to which
time
or
resources
is
used
for the
intended task or
purpose.
Measures
whether targets
are accomplished
with
a
minimum
amount
or
quantity
of
waste, expense,
or
unnecessary
effort.

In management, efficiency relates to doinq the thinqs riqht.

Timeliness
Measures
whether the
deliverable was
done on time
based on the
requirements of
the rules
and
regulations, and/
or
clients/
stakeholders.

Time-related

performance indicators evaluate

such things as project comple

and the extent to which targeted problems are solved. In management, effectiveness relates to qettinq the riahi thinqs done.

uate

such things as project completion

deadlines, time management skills and other time-sensitive

expectations.

CATEGORY
Effectiveness/ Quality

Efficiency

Timeliness

DEFINITION
The extent to which actual performance compares with targeted performance.
The degree to which objectives are achieved and the extent to which targeted problems are solved.
In management, effectiveness relates to getting the right things done.
The extent to which time or resources is used for the intended task or purpose. Measures whether
targets are accomplished with a minimum amount or quantity of waste, expense, or unnecessary effort.
In management, efficiency relates to doing the things right.
Measures whether the deliverable was done on time based on the requirements
regulations, and/ or clients/ stakeholders.

Time-related performance indicators evaluate such things

management skills and other time-sensitive expectations.

as project

completion

of the rules and

deadlines, time

OFFICE PERFORMANCE CO
Name of Employee:
JOSEPHINE E. BACSAL
Position:
PRINCIPAL IV
Bureau/ Center/ Service/ Division: SAMAR
Rating Period:
2014-2015

TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING

MFOs
1. Classroom monitoring and
supervision of classes

KRAs
Teaching-learning process

* To get the score, the rating is multiplied by the weight assigned

OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF

TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING

OBJECTIVES
Monitor/ supervise/ observe classes
through team supervision by the
school head and department heads at
least 2 teachers a day.

TIMELINE
Year Round

Monitor and supervise teacher

May to June
classroom structuring by the school
1, 2015
head and the department heads at the
beginning of school year

t assigned

Rater

Weight per
KRA
30%

10%

Annex E

AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF)

Name of Rater:
Position:
Date of Review:

FRANCIS ANGELO GELERA

ASSISTANT SUPERINTENDENT

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
(Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)

All department
heads/coordinators monitored/
observed and supervised classes
at least 3 teachers a day from
June to March 2015

Out of 65 teachers 50 teachers

structured their classrooms
starting from May 18 to June 1,
2015 with very satisfactory
performance

TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION

ACTUAL RESULTS
RATING
E
T
Ave
4
4
3
3.67
1.10

3.33

0.33

OVERALL
RATING FOR
ACCOMPLISHMENTS

Ratee

Approving Authority

Annex E

LUATION

Authority

SCORE