Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Food LABELING
Fdca labeling
o No fals/misleading, not under different name
o No misleading containers- needs to be labeled
o Standard of identity
Construction of label
o PDP
Common/usual name
Standard of identity
Net weight
o IP
Statement of ingredients
Manufacturers name/address
Other laws
o FPLA 1966
o NLEA 1990- nutrition education act
Scientific information
Standardized the format of providing nutrition
information on containers to the consumers
Nutrition facts panel on all packaged foods
Nutrient and health claims- have to be based on
scientific information
exclusions
o movie
o airplanes
o trains
o hotels/room service
o bowling alleys
o general merchandise stores with in-house concession stands
or primary business is not to sell food
Containers
Based on serving from suppliers
verify to FDA reasonable basis used to calculate
Restaurants and vending need to be providing
accurate info
Database, lab, pre-packaged
Must
1989 to 1990
o overdose of Tryptophan- helps go to sleep, metabolized to
serotonin, relaxes
o 37 deaths and 1500 cases of permanent disability from
ingestion of L trp. Investigation recommended DS to be
regulated as DRUGS
1990
o NLEA, nutrition labeling and education act
o Gave enhanced authority over labeling of foods/Dietary
Supplements (DS)
1994
o dietary supplement Health and education act (DSHEA)
o result of L- tryptophan investigation and lobbying war
o ** unique because it is the first time that an act or
amendment did NOT expand FDA authority and rather gave
them less authority!
o Congress reasoned public better served DS are less regulated
than drugs, and some food.
o Northcutts opinion:
Congress was trying to be popular
Allow average consumer to decide what to take.
Recognized that health food industry is viewed by
many
As a supplement too and a substitute for
prescription drugs
Dietary supplements are associated with
Reduced health expenses
Disease prevention
o
o
o
o
Liquids/tinctures
Powders
Bars
Beverages
Prebiotic
o Non digestive carbohydrates broken down by colon bacteria
o Promote of breakdown products foster good bacteria for
digestion
Probiotic
o Live, beneficial bacteria found in fermented foods
o Common in japan and Europe
o In yogurt (activia)
LABELING
NEED DISCLAIMER IF USING STRUCTURE FUNCTION STATEMENT
These statements have not been evaluated by the FDA
administration. This product is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure
or prevent any disease
Made to US pharmastudical standards
only standards set in US
look for this on a supplement
SUMMARY
To be a DS, must meet all of the following:
o Intended use
THIS LECTURE
Why do we need a food allergen labeling law
o Every 3 min, a food allergy sends someone to the emergency
room
BACKGROUND:
Prior to FALCPA-
wheat
soybeans
2
a food ingredient that contains protein derived
from a food specified in paragraph 1. Except
any highly refined oil derived fromm a food
specified in paragraph 1 and any ingredient
derived from such highly refined oil
food ingredient that is exempt under
paragraph 6/7 of section 403
FDA can exempt ingredients for exable
based on pre-market ex
o What is in this law?
Defines major food allergen
Requires major food allergens to be labeled on all foods
by common English names specific to the allergen
source- BIG 8
Gives FDA authority to modify allergen list
Required labeling for flabors, colors, and
incidental additives
o Why do we need a food allergen labeling law?
Increasing % of food recalls over the past 4 years
(nearly 10% increase)
Nearly 90% of all food recalls are due to undeclared
allergens, salmonella, listeria
All undeclared allergen recalls are Class 1
o How is FALCPA enforced?
FDCA 1938 gave FDA authority to inspect food
processing establishments, food
warehouses/distributors
Inspectors ensure compliance with all food laws
Inspectors review all practices, procedures, paper
work, and including making sure practices are in
place to reduce or eliminate cross-contaimination
Inspectors ensure products are properly labeled.
part
o Ingredient statement
o Allergen statement
o Gluten free labeling
Estimated 3 million people have celiac diseas
No legal definition for gluten-free until august 2013
when an FDA ruling gave uniform definition
1 gluten free foods must conatin less that 20 ppn
gluten
2. Foods may be labeled as gluten free if they are
inherently gluten free or do not contain an
ingredient that is:-- no reason gluten will be in
the product,
gluten-containing grain ex. spelt wheat
derived from a gluten-containing grain that
has not been processed to remove gluten
ex. wheat flour or
derived from a gluten-containing grain that
has been processed to removed gluten ex.
wheat starch, if the use of that ingredient
results in the presence of 20 ppm or more
gluten in the food
exemptions to the gluten free labeling
fda new regulation applies to all food and
beverages (including packaged foods, dietary
supplements, fruits and veggies, shell eggs, and
fish EXECEPT FOR:
meat, poultry, and certain egg products:
regulated by USDA
most alcoholic beverages (distilled spirits,
wines with 7% or more alcohol by volume,
and beverages made with malted barley and
hops-: regulated by alcohol and tobacco tax
and trade bureau TTB
o FALCP and gluten free labeling regulations
Like most other food laws, these two place the burden
back on the manufacturer but you are 1 or the 15
million with a food allergen or 1 of the 3 million with
celiac you can afford to trust anyone if you look like
this.
7. paraguay
8. pakistan
9. South africa
10. Uruguay
Europe- no GM crops
Huge import market
REGULATION of gm foods in us
Regulatory status of GM foods does not depend upon the method by
which the food was developed, but rather the characteristics of the
crop/food itself and its intended use or the intended use of its
components
o END PRODUCT!
o Manufacturer must:
Demonstrate that the GM crops do not pose any risk to
huans, animal producing foods, or environment
Demonstrate that the GM crops are comparable with
nature
USDAsafe to grow?
o USDA-APHIS-USDA animal and plant health inspection service
Goal of regulation is to protect plant health
APHIS issues permits for the introduction of GE
organisms that may pose a plant pest risk, including
other plants, insects, or microbes
Permit are issued after review of developer applications
Monitored by APHIS
Under federal plant pest act, regulates interstate
movement, importation and field testing of GMs that
have not been proven safe yet
o USDA-FSIS- USDA food and safety inspection service
EPA
o Environmental protection agency
o Evaluate for environmental safety
o Regulate sale, use and testing of plants and microorganisms
that produce pesticidal substances such as Bt corn under the
Federal insecticide, fungicide, and rodenticide Act (FIFRA)
BT CROPS
Bacillus thuringiensis(bt)- a naturally occurring
bacterium in soil
Toxin produced from bt is toxic to certain pest
insects
Genetically transferring the bt gene into plants
allows the plant to synthesize their own bactierial
toxin to kill pests
1995- EPA issued first bt-plant-incorporated
protectants in the US
bt corn, cotton, potatoes
EPA consulted expert groups and data about
health impacts over 2 year period
Concluded no unreasonable risk to
health/environment
o Doesnt hurt animals, only insects
Regulations include:
Farmers must register the bt plant with the
fda
Farmers must plant a bt refuge
o Blocks of crops that are not bt plants
to provide insects that remain
susceptible to the bt toxin
EX. starlink corn
Genetically modified to produce a protein
called CRY9C protein = pesticide
Approved USDA/FDA for animal feed only
because of the proteins potential
allergenicity
Non-governmental organizations tested
tacoshells and found Starlink corn DNA
Food companies implemented a recall
Developer of starlink corn voluntarily
withdrew its registration
o Mostly for cow feed, they are not
effected by starlink corn
o Toxic substance control act allows regulation of GM organisms
that possess pesticidal activities
o Epa grants permits for field testing if protectant is more than
10 hectares of land
FDA
o Food and drug administration
o GMO is safe to be consumed
o Center for food safety/nutrition
o Center for vet medicine
o Center for drug evaluation/research
o Center for biologys evaluation and research
All regulated under FDA 1938 and the definitions of
adulteration and misbranding
Safety of GMO?
Fda regulation of labeling
Alsos regulates labeling based on FDCA
Fda regulates labeling of GM foods the same
way they regulates labeling of conventional
foods based on substantial equivalence
Fda defines misleading as:
Representations made/suggested. By
statement, word, design, device or any
combo
Also which label/advertising fails to reveal
facts
o Consequences
Examples:
Foods are not required to be labeled as
GMO but here are exceptions:
o BRAZIL NUT:
Brazil nut plant introduced into
soybean plant to increase
protein concentration in animal
feed
Was found that those with
allergies to brazil nuts were also
allergic to GMO soy
Because soy could cause an
allergic reaction consequence
when consumed by those
sensitive to brazil nuts, food
was misbranded because it
failed to revel facts and there
were consequences
Foods containing an unexpected
allergen may also be considered
adulterated because of its
potential to be injurious to
health
o Labeling: soy oil
Compositional changes in lipid
profile in soy oil could be
misbranding if called soy oil