Professional Documents
Culture Documents
From the *Psychophysiology Laboratory, Institute of Psychology, Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland; Brain & Behaviour Research Institute, School of
Psychology, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia; Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Nijmegen,
Nijmegen, The Netherlands; and Department of Psychiatry, Jagiellonian University School of Medicine, Krakow, Poland.
Supported by the Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education funds reserved
for scientic research (2009).
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Miroslaw Wyczesany, PhD,
Ingardena 6, Krakow 30060, Poland; e-mail: miroslaw.wyczesany@uj.edu.pl.
Copyright 2011 by the American Clinical Neurophysiology Society
ISSN: 0736-0258/11/2803-0289
289
M. Wyczesany et al.
between these systems are expected to reveal their mutual relationships. The role of the frontal cortex and its hemispheric specialization is well documented; many studies support the link of the left
frontal area with positive emotions, while the right frontal area is
linked with negative emotions. Conversely, some studies give
support for alternative opinions, in the sense that only the right
hemisphere is specialized in all types of emotions (for review, see
Demaree et al., 2005). Some suggestion of functional heterogeneity
within the right temporoparietal system can also be found in our
previous data (Wyczesany et al., 2010).
The present experiment used drugs, diazepam and buspirone,
to modify the emotional state of the participants. Both these drugs
have anxiolytic effects. Diazepam (DZP) belongs to the benzodiazepines, a wide class of minor tranquilizers, sharing sedative,
anxiolytic, muscle-relaxing, and amnesic properties. Benzodiazepines have a general depressing effect on the central nervous system
by modifying the g-aminobutyric acid-A receptor, which is then
more easily activated by g-aminobutyric acid, the main inhibitory
brain neurotransmitter (Mehta and Ticku, 1999; Olkkola and Ahonen,
2008). In the present study, diazepam was expected to decrease both
the energetic and the tension aspects of subjective arousal. The second drug, buspirone (BSP), is a newer anxiolytic drug, which is
a partial 5-HT1A receptor agonist. Compared with DZP, it does not
affect g-aminobutyric acid receptors and has anxioselective action,
lacking sedative, muscle relaxing motor impairment, and anticonvulsive effects (Taylor, 1998; Cohn et al., 1989). In this study, BSP was
administered to decrease the subjective level of tension but, in contrast to diazepam, was not expected to inuence the level of energy
or alertness.
The effect of benzodiazepines on the spontaneous EEG power
is well established. Results show a consistent increase in b- or high
b-power, along with a decrease in u- and low a-activity. The pattern
of EEG activity after benzodiazepines is similar to that associated
with an alert state, while behavioral and subjective measures show
decreased activity and more drowsiness (Coenen and Van Luijtelaar,
1991). However, in the low frequencies, an increase in d over the
right temporoparietal region has been observed, which could be
related to a deactivation of the posterior emotional system (Yamadera et al., 1997). Conversely, BSP causes a shift in EEG frequency
toward low frequencies, from a to u, which is more pronounced in
the posterior than in the anterior sites (McAllistereWilliams et al.,
2007). An enhancement of low-frequency activity (delta and theta)
with a decrease in either whole b or only high b has been reported.
There are some inconsistencies concerning a-power, which is decreased or unchanged, depending on the study (Bond et al., 1983;
Holland et al., 1994; Murasaki et al., 1989).
The aim of the present study was to determine the relationships between subjective qualities of emotional state and the way the
cortical emotional systems cooperate with each other. This cooperation is inferred from synchronization measures of the EEG
recorded from cortical emotional areas. The drugs introduced in the
study are intended to modify the subjective state. It is hypothesized
that changes in the subjective state will be reected in specic
changes of synchronization levels. These activities could then be
considered as neural correlates of experiential aspects of subjective
states. The distinction in emotional specialization of cortical areas
(valence vs. nonspecic arousal) suggests a measurement of the
emotional state on the following dimensions: energetic arousal,
tension arousal, and valence. It is expected that the increase in
the scores, which are strongly linked with emotional arousal
(i.e., tension and negative valence), will be associated with
a heightened level of synchronization between prefrontal and right
290
Mood Assessment
The current emotional/activation state was assessed by the
computer version of the UMACL (Matthews et al., 1990) in the
Polish adaptation of Gory
nska (2001). It consists of 29 adjectives
describing subjective state rated on a 4-point scale. As a result, it
yields scores on three subscales: EA, TA, and hedonic tone (HT).
Procedure
The experimental procedure was approved by the Bioethical
Committee of the Jagiellonian University. Before the experiment, all
subjects were given basic information about the procedure and asked
to sign a written consent. Subjects were randomly assigned to one of
three groups in which different substances were administered orally
in accordance with a double-blind procedure: CTRdcontrol with
Copyright 2011 by the American Clinical Neurophysiology Society
Data Analysis
To check that after randomization, the balance between
genders in the experimental groups was maintained, a nonparametric
x2 test was used. Premedication subjective scores were checked
using a multivariate analysis of variance test to ensure no differences
between the groups. To determine whether the pharmacologic modication of mood was effective, the inuence of medication type on
differential subjective scores (before medication minus after medication) was analyzed using one-way multivariate analysis of variance
with planned contrasts: DZP versus CTR 1 BSP for the EA scale
(decreased activation effect), CTR versus DZP 1 BSP for the TA
scale (the effect of tension reduction), and CTR versus DZP 1 BSP
for the HT scale (the control group was checked against the medication groups). The effect of the drugs on EEG power was veried
using an analysis of variance with planned contrasts testing b-increase
in the DZP group versus the CTR group and a-decrease in the BSP
group versus the CTR group.
Before the main analyses, a baseline (predrug) EEG check
was conducted using a series of multivariate analysis of variance
tests to nd any group differences in baseline synchronization level.
None of the parameters (neither Wilks L nor Hotellings trace)
reached signicance level. This result conrmed that no pretreatment
group differences existed.
Within each of the EEG frequency bands, the associations
between scores on the subjective scales and synchronization
magnitudes between all combinations of electrodes were checked
using Pearsons r correlation coefcient. Positive correlation here
means an increased synchronization level related to higher subjective
scores, while negative correlation reects decreased synchronization
in the same conditions. Because of multiple hypothesis testing, additional correction of P levels was applied using the false discovery
rate procedure, which, apart from controlling experimentwise error
rate, can preserve relative high statistical power (Benjamini and
Hochberg, 1995). The P levels reported are corrected values.
Diazepam Group
In the DZP group, positive correlations with EA between C4
and right frontal (Fp2) as well as posterior CP2 electrodes were
observed in the higher b-band. The HT scores were negatively correlated with the SL level between right posterior and frontal electrodes, and this effect was apparent for a-band as well as for the high
b-band; however, in lower frequencies, more signicant effects were
observed (Fig. 2; Table 3).
Buspirone Group
After BSP intake, EA estimation was found to be positively
correlated with SL levels between centroparietal and prefrontal areas
over the whole frequency range (8 to 30 Hz), and also with the left
frontal area in the lower frequencies (8 to 15 Hz). Some effects
within the centroparietal area were also visible. The C4 electrode
seemed to be the center of these effects and increased its functional
dependencies with both frontal and centroparietal sites in conditions
RESULTS
Effect of the Drugs
Scale
EA
TA
HT
Group
Minimum
Maximum
CTR
DZP
BSP
CTR
DZP
BSP
CTR
DZP
BSP
211
210
213
24
25
27
23
23
21
10
4
8
9
3
7
8
7
10
Mean
1.11
23.44
21.00
0.50
21.44
21.22
3.83
2.50
3.56
291
M. Wyczesany et al.
FIG. 1. Dashed lines link pairs of electrodes for which negative correlations between subjective scores and the SL were observed in
the CTR group.
of rising energy estimation. Such increase in synchronization related
to high EA scores was also seen in the case of short-distance effects
within the centroparietal area. For the highest frequencies (especially
b-3; 24 to 30 Hz), TA scores were positively correlated with synchronizations between the T8 electrode and some frontal and right
posterior electrodes. Also, in these highest frequencies, additional
effects with SL between left frontal and posterior area could be
observed. The HT scores were again negatively correlated with SL
level between right temporoparietal and frontal electrodes in bfrequencies; however, the effects in the right centroparietal region
were found for the higher b-band (24 to 30 Hz) (Fig. 3; Table 4).
DISCUSSION
Functional connectivity estimation measures can be confounded by common sources present in the EEG signal. It is an
effect of scalp volume connectivity as well as the inuence of
reference electrodes, which causes the potential from relatively focal
sources to be spread across the scalp, with magnitude decreasing
together with distance between the given electrodes (Barry et al.,
2005). Scalp volume conductance, as the rst source of possible
spurious effects, can especially increase detections of short-distance
synchronizations. Therefore, these effects should be interpreted with
caution. Conversely, long-distance functional connections, which
were our primary interest, are considered to be relatively weakly
sensitive to this problem (Handy, 2009). Additionally, because we
are inferring about cortical areas that are located relatively close to
the skull (and not deep, subcortical structures), the uncertainty introduced by volume conduction is further diminished. Thus, we
assume that our data are sufcient to draw conclusions about synchronizations between the regions of interest, with special caution
for within-area (short-distance) effects. However, in the case of longdistance synchrony, a problem of reference electrodes can still be
meaningful. This inuence was limited here by using an averaged
reference system. It should also be noted that these volume conduction and reference effects would be expected to affect all our subjects
similarly, so that any observed group differences cannot be attributed
to these sources.
292
a-2
HT
a-1
a-2
b-1
b-3
Electrodes
Fp2/AF4
Fp2/F7
Fp2/F8
F7/F8
Fp1/F7
Fp1/F8
Fp2/AF4
Fp2/F7
F7/F8
20.59*
20.52
20.48
20.59*
20.50
20.49
20.53
20.54*
20.51
Fp1/T8
AF3/T8
F7/T8
Fp1/T8
AF3/T8
F7/T8
Fp1/T8
F7/T8
AF3/CP2
F7/T8
20.62
20.59
20.68
20.59
20.59
20.69
20.58
20.69
20.63
20.70
P # 0.05. *P # 0.01; all P levels are adjusted by the False Discovery Rate
procedure.
FIG. 2. The lines connect the pairs of electrodes for which correlations between subjective scores and the SL were observed in the
DZP group. Solid lines represent positive correlations, while dashed lines represent negative correlations.
a-2
b-3
Electrodes
Fp2/C4
C4/CP2
Fp2/C4
0.73
0.52
0.51
Fp1/CP6
AF3/C4
AF3/CP2
F7/C4
AF3/C4
AF3/CP2
F7/C4
Fp2/C4
AF4/CP2
20.60
20.69
20.72
20.73
20.62
20.68
20.66
20.74
20.50
P # 0.05; *P # 0.01; all P levels are adjusted by the False Discovery Rate
procedure.
293
M. Wyczesany et al.
FIG. 3. The lines connect the pairs of electrodes for which correlations between subjective scores and the SL were observed in the
BSP group. Solid lines represent positive correlations, while dashed lines represent negative correlations.
the drug groups differ according to the effect size, as well as why the
effect is absent in the control group, remains unclear.
Contrary to the hypothesis, the TA scores in the control group
were not correlated with the level of synchronization between the
frontal and posterior areas. Instead, changes were limited to the
frontal area, where synchronization decreased with increasing
tension. It is noticeable that this effect was visible only for the
low frequencies, particularly those covering the a-frequencies.
This activity has traditionally been considered as one of the basic
brain integrating rhythms, originating in thalamic pacemaker cells
(Skinner et al., 2000). Despite the newer data suggesting distinction
of several functional rhythms in this frequency range with possibly multiple generators (Basar et al., 1997), a-power is usually
considered as an index of cortical deactivation (Barry et al., 2009;
DiFrancesco et al., 2008) and is negatively correlated with fMRI
BOLD (Blood-Oxygen-Level Dependence) signal (Laufs et al.,
2006). In agreement with these ndings, the present observation of
a decreased a-synchronization in tension conditions may reect
a more active cortex. However, after medication, these low-frequency associations with tension are not observed, and the reason
behind this is not completely clear.
Quite different effects related to tension estimation were
found in the BSP group. Increase in synchrony between the temporal
T8 site and the frontal region was accompanied by some synchronizations within parietal areas at high frequencies. This effect,
although predicted by the theory, could be seen only in the BSP
group. It reects an enhancement of communication between the
temporal lobe and the frontal and right posterior areas. The right
Copyright 2011 by the American Clinical Neurophysiology Society
b-3
TA
b-2
b-3
EA
a-1
a-2
b-1
b-2
Electrodes
Fp2/T8
AF4/T8
F8/T8
Fp1/P4
Fp1/P8
Fp2/T8
AF4/T8
F7/P8
F8/T8
20.65
20.64
20.73
20.50
20.49
20.72*
20.76*
20.66
20.77*
F7/T8
F8/T8
T8/CP2
T8/P4
AF3/C4
AF3/P8
AF4/T8
F7/P8
F8/T8
0.55
0.67
0.53
0.62
0.53
0.55
0.56
0.74*
0.69
C4/CP2
C4/CP6
C4/P4
C4/P8
Fp1/C4
Fp2/C4
AF3/C4
F7/C4
Fp2/C4
AF3/C4
C4/CP2
C4/CP6
C4/P4
C4/P8
CP6/P4
P4/P8
Fp1/C4
Fp2/C4
AF3/C4
F7/C4
C4/CP2
C4/CP6
C4/P8
CP6/P4
P4/P8
Fp1/C4
Fp2/C4
AF3/C4
F7/C4
AF3/C4
F7/C4
Fp2/C4
C4/CP2
C4/P4
C4/P8
CP2/P8
CP6/P4
P4/P8
0.60
0.75*
0.66*
0.76*
0.77*
0.67
0.80*
0.75*
0.67
0.80*
0.64*
0.74*
0.61
0.79*
0.84*
0.75*
0.81*
0.76*
0.82*
0.74*
0.61
0.64
0.71*
0.85*
0.74*
0.76
0.72
0.67
0.73
0.67
0.73
0.73
0.54
0.52
0.52
0.61*
0.80*
0.71*
TABLE 4. (Continued )
Band
b-3
Electrodes
C4/CP2
CP2/P8
CP6/P4
P4/P8
Fp2/C4
Fp2/CP6
0.52
0.57
0.70*
0.56
0.67
0.67
*P # 0.05; all P levels are adjusted by the False Discovery Rate procedure.
CONCLUSIONS
The main hypothesis concerning a stable relationship between
subjective measures of emotional state and cortical EEG synchronization patterns received substantial support. The obtained results
can be interpreted as increased cooperation of both the prefrontal and
the posterior emotional areas in conditions of increased negative
valence as well as increase in both kinds of affective arousal:
energetic and tension. Especially the valence dimension (HT), but
also EA, showed similar results in different groups. In the case of the
former, data analysis revealed two centers of synchronization, which
are possibly functionally distinct but together form the postulated
right temporoparietal emotional area. It was speculated that the
parietal center is especially related to unspecic arousal, while
the temporal center is associated with negative emotional arousal.
The presented results suggest that combining subjective measures
with nonlinear synchronization methods can be a valuable tool for
inferring functional cortical dependences in emotional processes.
REFERENCES
Barry RJ, Clarke AR, Johnstone SJ, et al. Adjusting EEG coherence for interelectrode distance effects: an exploration in normal children. Int J Psychophysiol 2005;55:313e321.
Barry RJ, Clarke AR, Johnstone SJ, et al. Electroencephalogram theta/beta ratio
and arousal in attention-decit/hyperactivity disorder: evidence of independent processes. Biol Psychiatry 2009;66:398e401.
Basar E, Schrmann M, Basar-Eroglu C, Karakas S. Alpha oscillations in brain
functioning: an integrative theory. Int J Psychophysiol 1997;26:5e29.
Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical
and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc B Met 1995;57:
289e300.
Besser GM, Duncan C. The time course of action of single doses of diazepam,
chlorpromazine and some barbiturates as measured by auditory utter fusion
and visual icker fusion thresholds in man. Br J Pharmacol Chemother
1967;30:341.
295
M. Wyczesany et al.
296