Professional Documents
Culture Documents
by Matthew Galla
Materials and Process Development Manager
Tyco Electronics Power Components/Raychem Circuit Protection Group
Circuit protection for rechargeable lithium-based battery cells and packs is a critical design
consideration. Overcurrent and overtemperature conditions that can result from accidental
shorting or abusive/runaway charging can raise temperatures high enough to damage
components and cause substantial equipment damage.
Early circuit-protection designs relied on fragile one-shot fuses to provide total current
interruption for overcurrent protection. However, because the majority of fault conditions that
a battery pack encounters are relatively infrequent or intermittent events, a resettable
protection device is generally preferable.
Today, Li-ion packs typically include an active overvoltage and overcurrent detecting safety
circuit (IC and MOSFETs) as the primary pack protection, and a polymeric positive
temperature coefficient (PPTC) device in series as a second level of protection. Although the
semiconductor circuitry is considered reliable, there are conditions under which failure of the
primary protection may occur, such as excessive electrostatic discharge, high temperature, or
oscillation during a short circuit condition. In these cases, the PPTC device provides both
short-circuit and overcharge protection.
For emerging Li-ion cell technologies, such as Li-P and Li-Mn, the increased level of safety
inherent in the cell design has led some OEM pack designers to eliminate the IC safety circuit
and rely on a PPTC device as the primary short-circuit and overcharge protection (Fig. 1.) An
optional secondary passive element, in the form of a current fuse or thermal fuse, is
sometimes included if protection is needed beyond the rated voltage of the PPTC device.
Evaluation Of Primary PPTC Overcharge Protection In Li-Mn And Li-P Battery Packs
Raychem Circuit Protection recently purchased commercially-available OEM battery packs
that rely on PPTC devices for primary pack protection and subjected them to overcharge
testing. The Li-Mn packs were rated at 600 mA-hr, and the Li-P packs at 650 mA-hr. The
cells were removed from the packs with circuitry intact and each type was then subjected to
2.5 C-12 V overcharge tests with and without PPTC protection. Test data were collected with
thermocouples connected to each cell. The same tests were then repeated using a thermalimaging camera.
The 2.5 C-12 V overcharge test conducted on a Li-Mn cell without PPTC overcharge
protection resulted in a damaged, inoperative cell. The data (Fig. 2) show the rapid increase
in temperature that resulted from overcharge, and the thermal image captures the cell at
maximum temperature. In this test, the cell reached a maximum surface temperature of
117C, the can bulged from its original thickness of 6mm to 10mm, and the cell was rendered
inoperative when the separator melted. Note that the drop in charge current occurred only
when the separator melted.
Fig. 2. 2.5-C 12-V Test Shows Temperatures In Li-Mn Cell Without Protection
When the same test was performed on a Li-Mn cell with PPTC protection (here a PolySwitch
VTP210 device) the results were more favorable. The data (Fig. 3) show how the cell
temperature increased as the overcharge progressed, but when the cell reached 80C, the
PPTC device interrupted the charge current, held off the excess charge voltage, and the cell
began to cool. The PPTC device caused this drop in charge current by going into a high
resistance state. Note that the PPTC device latched in its high-resistance state at its trip
temperature (~100C) but did not heat the cell.
Fig. 3. 2.5-C 12-V Test Shows Temperatures In Li-Mn Cell With PPTC Protection
As with the Li-Mn tests, the 2.5-C 12-V overcharge test conducted on a Li-P cell without
PPTC overcharge protection resulted in a damaged, inoperative cell. Testing of the Li-P cell
with PPTC protection had positive results analogous to those in the Li-Mn case. For both LiP cells tested with PPTC protection, the cells reached a maximum temperature of
approximately 50C, and were operational after the test. The only notable change was
loosening of the normally tight foil-laminate package.
Fig. 4: Smaller PPTC Device From Same Material Shuts Off At Lower Temperature
Another option for achieving lower thermal cutoff temperature is to use a device made with a
lower temperature PPTC material. Such devices can be lower in resistance and still maintain
a low thermal cutoff because of their reduced trip temperature. Combinations of device size
and material allow for fine-tuning of the thermal cutoff temperature, giving pack designers
the ability to specify appropriate protection and improve pack performance.
Summary
Commercially-available OEM packs with Li-P and Li-Mn cells are now employing PPTC
devices as primary protection. Laboratory overcharge testing at 2.5-C 12-V demonstrated that
PPTC devices reduced maximum cell temperature by 40 - 50C, while also helping to prevent
bulging, rupture, separator melting, and cell shutdown. The latest generation of PPTC
materials provides pack designers with another level of design flexibility in the form of lowresistance devices capable of providing lower thermal cutoff.
Ultimately, pack designers must decide what level of protection is required for their
applications and only a system test can determine whether or not a specific protection device
is appropriate. Recommendations from device manufacturers are useful in narrowing
protection options, and benchmarking other pack protection schemes may provide a good
lead for further investigation. However, specific testing of each protection option is the best
way to evaluate its effectiveness.