Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Rhythm
Heart Rate(s)
PR Interval
The normal PR interval (measured from the beginning of the P wave to the beginning of the QRS
complex) is 0.12 to 0.2 sec. A uniformly prolonged
PR interval is often referred to as first-degree AV
block (see Chapter 17). A short PR interval with
sinus rhythm and with a wide QRS complex and a
delta wave is seen in the Wolff-Parkinson-White
(WPW) pattern. By contrast, a short PR interval
with retrograde P waves (negative in lead II) generally indicates an ectopic (atrial or AV junctional)
pacemaker.
QT/QTc Interval
QRS Voltage
Look for signs of right or left ventricular hypertrophy (see Chapter 6). Remember that thin people,
athletes, and young adults frequently show tall
voltage without left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH).
Low voltage may result from pericardial effusion or pleural effusion, hypothyroidism, emphysema, anasarca obesity, myocardial disease, or
other factors (see Chapter 24).
Abnormal Q Waves
ST Segments
T Waves
U Waves
Memory Aid
Students looking for a mnemonic to help
recall key features of the ECG can try using
IR-WAX. I is for the four basic intervals
(heart rate, PR, QRS, QT/QTc); R is for rhythm
(sinus or other), W is for the five alphabetically named waves (P, QRS, ST, T and U),
and AX is for electrical axis.
Formulating an Interpretation
aVR
V1
V4
II
aVL
V2
V5
III
aVF
V3
V6
10 mm/mv; 25 mm/sec
Figure 22-1. ECG for interpretation: (1) standardization10 mm/mV; 25 mm/sec (electronic calibration); (2) rhythmnormal
sinus (3) heart rate75 beats/min; (4) PR interval0.16 sec; (5) P wavesnormal size; (6) QRS width0.08 sec (normal); (7) QT
interval0.4 sec (slightly prolonged for rate); (8) QRS voltagenormal; (9) mean QRS axisabout 30 (biphasic QRS complex in
lead II with positive QRS complex in lead I); (10) R wave progression in chest leadsearly precordial transition with relatively tall R
wave in lead V2; (11) abnormal Q wavesleads II, III, and aVF; (12) ST segmentsslightly elevated in leads II, III, aVF, V4, V5, and V6;
slightly depressed in leads V1 and V2; (13) T wavesinverted in leads II, III, aVF, and V3 through V6; and (14) U wavesnot prominent. Impression: This ECG is consistent with an inferolateral (or infero-posterolateral) wall myocardial infarction of indeterminate age, possibly
recent or evolving. Comment: The relatively tall R wave in lead V2 could reflect loss of lateral potentials or actual posterior wall
involvement.
interpretation could be Repolarization abnormalities consistent with drug effect or toxicity (sotalol,
dofetilide, etc.) or hypokalemia. Clinical correlation
suggested.
Another ECG might show wide P waves, right
axis deviation, and a tall R wave in lead V1 (see Fig.
22-1). The interpretation could be Findings consistent with left atrial abnormality (enlargement) and right
ventricular hypertrophy. This combination is highly suggestive of mitral stenosis.
In yet a third case the overall interpretation
might simply be Within normal limits.
As noted earlier, you should also formulate a
statement comparing the present ECG with previous ECGs (when available). If none is available,
then you should conclude: No previous ECG for
comparison available.
Every ECG abnormality you identify should
summon a list of differential diagnostic possi
bilities (see Chapter 24). You should search for an
explanation of every abnormality found.
For example, if the ECG shows sinus tachycardia, you need to find the cause of the rapid rate.
Is it a result of anxiety, fever, hyperthyroidism,
c hronic heart failure, hypovolemia, sympathomimetic drugs, alcohol withdrawal, or some other
cause?
If you see signs of LVH, is the likely cause valvular heart disease, hypertensive heart disease, or
cardiomyopathy?
In this way the interpretation of an ECG
becomes an integral part of clinical diagnosis and
patient care.
Figure 22-2. Magnified view of ECG highlights rapid oscillations of the baseline due to 60 cycle/sec (Hertz) alternating current
(AC) electrical interference.
ECG ARTIFACTS
The ECG, like any other electronic recording, is
subject to numerous artifacts that may interfere
with accurate interpretation. Some of the most
common of these are described here.
Muscle Tremor
Wandering Baseline
Improper Standardization
A
II
B
Figure 22-3. Artifacts simulating major arrhythmias. A, Motion artifact mimicking a rapid ventricular tachycardia. The normal
QRS complexes, indicated by the arrows (and largely obscured by the artifact) can be seen at a rate of about 100 beats/min. B, Parkinsonian tremor causing oscillations of the baseline in lead II that mimic atrial fibrillation. Note the regularity of the QRS complexes,
which provides a clue that atrial fibrillation is not present. (From Mirvis DM, Goldberger AL: Electrocardiography. In Bonow RO,
Mann DL, Zipes DP, Libby P (eds): Braunwalds Heart Disease, 9th ed. Philadelphia, WB Saunders, 2012, p 163, used with
permission.)
Figure 22-4. Wandering baseline resulting from patient movement or loose electrode contact.
Figure 22-5. Deflections simulating ventricular premature beats, produced by patient movement. An artifact produced by 60-Hz interference is also present.