Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Problem Solving
Revision 9
Revision 9
Surface
Problems
of success)
Revision 9
P hilo s o p hy
W as te E lim inatio n
P e rf o rm anc e Me as ure
R e d uc e d L e ad T im e
P rinc ip le
C re ate C o ntinuo us
P ro c e s s F lo w
S trate g y
C re ate I nte rd e p e nd e nt
"C o nne c te d " P ro c e s s e s
L e an T o o ls
K anb an, S up e rm arke ts ,
D e f ine d F I F O L ane s
R e s ult
W as te is
R e d uc e d !
Me tho d
P ull S ys te m
R e as o n
P ro b le m s are S urf ac e d
Q uic kly and are C ritic al
C o ntro l Me tho d
Utilize V is ual C o ntro ls s o
T hat no P ro b le m s are
Hid d e n
Effect
P ro b le m s Mus t b e
C o rre c te d Q uic kly
Copyright Lean Associates, Inc. www.leanassociates.com
Revision 9
Revision 9
Revision 9
Revision 9
Do we have problems?
What are some of the problems you have here?
List problems on the board
There are NO SHORTAGE of problems in ANY
work area!
Can we SEE problems?
Accidents, near misses, defects, scrap,
performance to schedule/budget, attendance??
Revision 9
Revision 9
The Goal
The ultimate goal of PPS is not
just to solve the problem at
hand!
The goal is to make problem
solving transparent and
teachable in order to create an
organization of problem
solvers.
Copyright Lean Associates, Inc. www.leanassociates.com
Revision 9
Strategic
Initiative
Strategic
Initiative
Project
Project
Project
Project
Very
few big
problems
Few
medium sized
problems
Project
Many
small
problems
Revision 9
Point of Pain
Go
and
See
Why?
Why?
Why?
Why?
Why?
Basic Cause/
Effect Investigation
DirectCause
Cause
Root
Cause
Countermeasure
Share Best
Practices
Copyright Lean Associates, Inc. www.leanassociates.com
Revision 9
Revision 9
Junk Words
17
Revision 9
Yes
No
Yes
Does anyone
know?
Yes
No
Yes
No
Can you blame
someone else?
Have you
touched it?
No
Will it
blow up in
your face?
No
Pretend you havent seen it
Yes
Revision 9
No Problem
Standard
Where you want to be.
Quantifiable
G
A
P
Problem
Current Situation
Where you are now.
Revision 9
Problem or Opportunity
What do we do?
Standard or
Goal
KAIZEN ZONE
The
Problem
Actual
Performance
Problems MUST be corrected
Kaizen is opportunity for improvement
Copyright Lean Associates, Inc. www.leanassociates.com
Revision 9
Revision 9
Whats different?
How often?
Whats changed?
Revision 9
Problem Relationships
Higher cost is a result of
poor operational capability,
quality and service
COST
CUSTOMER
SERVICE
OPERATIONAL
CAPABILITY
Productivity
Efficiency
Equipment
People
Materials
QUALITY
What you have to do
well to provide service
Defects
Scrap
Rework
Revision 9
Lead To
80% of the
Opportunity
80% of Problems
Lead To
20% of the
Opportunity
Revision 9
Revision 9
Revision 9
Revision 9
Revision 9
Revision 9
Learning to
Present your
Thinking Using
A3
Lean Associates, Inc.
P.O. Box 5448
Berkeley, CA 94705
Copyright Lean Associates, Inc. www.leanassociates.com
Revision 9
All materials copyright Lean Associates, Inc. No part of this presentation may be
copied or reproduced without written permission of Lean Associates, Inc.
What is an A3?
Communication tool
Tool to develop logical thinking
Provide a common language
Way to organize vast amounts of
information in concise format
Revision 9
Typical A3 Report
Whats Included
1. A clear reason for the report (story)
2. A clear presentation of facts, not opinions
3. An objective analysis of data
4. A specific, rational conclusion
5. Recommended actions:
Short term / Long term
6. Monitoring activity/ next steps /follow up
Copyright Lean Associates, Inc. www.leanassociates.com
Revision 9
A3 Thinking
Understanding Causality
Seeking Predictability
Ensuring Ongoing, Unending Learning
Revision 9
Revision 9
36
Revision 9
Case Example:
Understand the current situation
1. Problem Statement
- Paint defects on the Powder Coat Line are 2% over the standard and
Revision 9
Revision 9
Revision 9
Revision 9
Case Example:
Clarify targets and goals
2. Target / Goal
20
09
6/
26
/
20
09
6/
19
/
20
09
12
/
00
9
6/
5/
2
6/
20
09
5/
29
/
20
09
5/
22
/
20
09
15
/
00
9
5/
8/
2
5/
4/
17
/
20
09
10
/
4/
00
9
26-Jun-09
1/
2
By When
5/
2%
20
09
How Much
24
/
Paint Defects
4/
To What
20
09
Reduce
Do What
3.5
3
2.5
2
1.5
1
0.5
0
Revision 9
Revision 9
Revision 9
Revision 9
Revision 9
Revision 9
Revision 9
Revision 9
Revision 9
Narrowing Focus
L A R G E P R O B L E M
Many Possible Causes
Most Likely Causes
Point of Cause
5 Why Process
Root Causes
Revision 9
Point of
Cause
The Point of
Cause may not
be at the Point of
Occurrence
Point of
Occurrence
Point of
Recognition
Revision 9
Relationship of
Problem/Symptom/Cause
PROBLEM
(Virus)feel well)
(Don't
THESE
SYMPTOMS
EXIST
AS A RESULT OF
THE PROBLEM
ANALYSIS
LEADS TO
ROOT CAUSES
Revision 9
Relationship of
Problem/Symptom/Cause
SYMPTOMS:
PROBLEM
Quality Issue
Causes
(Reduced Efficiency)
AS A RESULT OF
THE PROBLEM
Increased Cost,
Poor Customer
Service
Therefore
Quality
(Errors and
Omissions)
Revision 9
Examples: What/Where/When
Machines, equipment and tools
Precision
Reliable and Repeatable
Cycle time fast enough (too fast)
Correct settings
Fixtures / Tooling
Any other issues like hitting things with a
hammer to get them into the machine.
Copyright Lean Associates, Inc. www.leanassociates.com
Revision 9
Examples: What/Where/When
Environment (Workplace Layout)
Lighting
Temperature
Work Position (Reaching / Overhead)
Extreme Effort
Noise
Any other issues like extra effort or
difficulties with work.
Copyright Lean Associates, Inc. www.leanassociates.com
Revision 9
Examples: What/Where/When
Work Method and Procedures
Standard method defined and
followed
Correct pace
Over-processing
Evidence of correction or rework
People (Man)
Skills and Training
Absenteeism
Turnover
Revision 9
Examples: What/Where/When
Materials, parts, products
Incoming quality
Size, shape, tolerances
Material shortages, or outages
Extra effort required to make parts
work
Revision 9
Heavy Paint
Thin Paint
Contamination
Frequency
Total
17
12
Revision 9
Other
Lead To
20% of the
Gap
Copyright Lean Associates, Inc. www.leanassociates.com
Revision 9
Other
Contamination
Heavy Paint
Thin Paint
18
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
Paint Surging
(Splatters)
# Defects
Case Example:
Narrowing the Focus
Revision 9
Revision 9
Case Example:
Brainstorm Possible Causes
Defect Rate in Powder Paint
Why?
Method
Machine
Material
Environment
Lack of
Training
Operator
Technique
Worn
Gun
Paint
Clumps
Poor
Lighting
Dont
Care
Motion
Up Down
Set Up
Wrong
Wet
Powder
Faraday
Trap
Side to
Side
Hose
Kink
Defects on
Parts
Mask and
Suit
Wrong
Hose
Dirt in
Parts
Worn
Venturi
Pump
Worn
Copyright Lean Associates, Inc. www.leanassociates.com
Revision 9
People
Method
Material
Revision 9
Revision 9
Revision 9
Revision 9
Revision 9
Revision 9
Revision 9
Example of Worksheet
Most Likely Contributor Selection Worksheet
1. Review list of Possible Causes.
2. Combine any items that are the same or similar
3. Clarify any items to ensure all members understand the meaning
4. Use a voting method to decide which are the 3 Most Likely Contributors
5. Select items that happen most often or contribute the most to the gap (problem)
Most Likely Contributor #1
Why do you believe this is a Most Likely Contributor? (List any obsevations or data)
What ideas do you have to prove that this is an actual contributor to the problem?
Revision 9
Case Example:
Determine Most Likely Contributors
Determined that the defect is actually a clump of
paint on the surface (not contamination).
Found that the hoses and venturi were in
specification.
Faraday Trap is inside corners and defect is on the
outside of parts.
Tested up-down motions and could not duplicate
problem.
Tested old and new guns- no difference.
Operators showed concern and desire to solve
problem.
Copyright Lean Associates, Inc. www.leanassociates.com
Revision 9
Method
Machine
Material
Workplace
Lack of
Training
Operator
Technique
Worn
Gun
Paint
Clumps
Poor
Lighting
Dont
Care
Motion
Up Down
Set Up
Wrong
Wet
Powder
Faraday
Trap
Side to
Side
Hose
Kink
Defects on
Parts
Mask and
Suit
Wrong
Hose
Dirt in
Parts
Experimentation
allows us to prove or
disprove our
theories.
Worn
Venturi
Pump
Worn
Revision 9
Revision 9
Revision 9
Machine
Operator
Technique
Set Up
Wrong
Point of
Occurrence
Revision 9
Incorrect Equipment
Set Up Theory
Air Pressure
High/Low
Powder Flow
High/Low
KV Setting High/Low
Fluidization of Powder
Revision 9
Results of Experiments
Set Up Test
Air Pressure
KV
Powder
Result
+ 10 PSI
No Change
No Change
No Problem
+ 20 PSI
No Change
No Change
X
Problem
+ 20 PSI
+ 2.O
No Change
X
More Problem
+ 10 PSI
+2.O
No Change
X
Problem
Revision 9
Case Example:
Greatest Actual Contributors
3. Cause Analysis
Method
Spraying Technique
Set-Up
Air Pressure Setting too high
Set-Up
KV Setting too high
Why?
Why?
Why?
Root Causes
Revision 9
Revision 9
Revision 9
Therefore!
Therefore!
Therefore!
Therefore!
Therefore!
Root Cause
Revision 9
Case Example:
Confirm the Root Cause
Defect Rate in Powder Paint
Why?
Why?
Spray Technique
KV Setting High
Why?
Rapid
Movement
Incorrect
Incorrect
Setting
Setting
Why?
Cause
Cause
Cause
Cause
Cause
Why?
Keep digging to get to root causes!
Copyright Lean Associates, Inc. www.leanassociates.com
Revision 9
Revision 9
85
Revision 9
Revision 9
Revision 9
Case Example:
Confirm Root Cause
3. Cause Analysis
Method
Spraying Technique
Set-Up
Air Pressure Setting too high
Set-Up
KV Setting too high
Why? (Does spraying technique cause splatter?) Why? (Is the air pressure set high?)
Someone set incorrectly
Gun moved rapidly causes paint to surge
increases coverage
Root Causes
Revision 9
Revision 9
Revision 9
Revision 9
Revision 9
Revision 9
Brainstorm Countermeasures
Problems are never truly solved, they
are merely kept in control (minimized).
This control is called a countermeasure.
The countermeasure must be used
constantly to control the problem and
remain effective.
Failure to use the proper countermeasure
will allow for reoccurrence (defects).
There is no absolute countermeasure.
Copyright Lean Associates, Inc. www.leanassociates.com
Revision 9
Brainstorm Countermeasures
Revision 9
Evaluate Countermeasures
Countermeasure(s) should always be evaluated on
their ability to achieve your target/goal.
They should be effective:
Can you test the countermeasure?
Will this countermeasure be enough to achieve the
target/goal?
Revision 9
Evaluate Countermeasures
They should be feasible.
To Determine how feasible the countermeasure may be,
ask the questions:
Can it be done by the team?
Can it be done now?
Is it low cost?
Revision 9
Evaluate Countermeasures
They should have impact!
Ask what impact might this countermeasure have on:
Other processes and people?
My job?
My team?
Other operations?
The company as a whole?
Revision 9
Prioritize Countermeasures
High
Potential Value
High Priority
o Second wave
First Priority
Just Do Its
o Evaluate these first &
implement ASAP
Defer
Second Priority
Just Do Its
o Evaluate later
o Second wave
Prioritized
list of ideas
to be further
evaluated
Low
Difficult
Easy
Ease of Implementation
o
o
o
Revision 9
Prioritize Countermeasures
Keep both a short term and a long term
perspective in mind.
Short Term Countermeasures
What can fix the problem immediately?
Does it help achieve the target or goal?
Implement Short Term Countermeasures while
developing Long Term Countermeasures.
Revision 9
Case Example:
Evaluate and Prioritize Countermeasures
4. Countermeasures
Testing showed that it is possible to recognize the defect at the point of occurrence. Developed spot check procedure
Short-Term (Temporary)
Mark gauges with correct settings
Implement process confirmation of gauges 4 times per shift by line leader
Long-Term (Permanent): Use JI to re-instruct operators correct spray speed, distance, etc.
Build in Spot Inspection at paint booth to prevent defect from going into oven. Repair can be made easily at paint booth.
Put lock on gauge setting to prevent changing without line leader awareness
Revision 9
Revision 9
Revision 9
Case Example:
Develop the Implementation Plan
5. Implementation Plan
What will be implemented
Who
When
Where
Status
Behind
1 Color gauge face green showing proper setting range
Kora S
4/30/2009
Paint Booth
Complete
In front of
2 Develop visual cards indicating gauges checked 4 times per shift
Kim M
5/5/2009
Paint Booth
Complete
Michael M
5/5/2009
Paint Booth
In Process
Matthew M
5/20/2009
Gauges
Scheduled
5.
Revision 9
Revision 9
Revision 9
Revision 9
Revision 9
Revision 9
Revision 9
Revision 9
Revision 9
Revision 9
Revision 9
Revision 9
Standardize Effective
Countermeasures
Revision 9
Case Example:
Confirm and Follow Up
Check Method
Visual check of gauges and confirm inprocess inspection
Check Frequency
Once at start of shift and any time the problem is detected
Revision 9
Sustaining Countermeasures
Continuous Improvement
Revision 9
Revision 9
Case Example:
Develop Future Steps
Revision 9
20 minutes
Revision 9
A3 Example
Revision 9
Revision 9