Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Dan Thomasson
dthomasson@carolina.rr.com
TS5120 Project Management
March 24, 2004
Table of Contents
1. Executive Summary.
2. Definitions, Acronyms, and Abbreviations
3. Project Overview..
3.1. Business Case..
3.2. Windows XP Migration Benefits
3.2.1. Better Performance..
3.2.2. Enhanced Security
3.2.3. Better Mobile Experience
3.2.4. Real-Time Communications
3.2.5. Return on Investment...
3.3. Project Charter
3.3.1. Project Objectives
3.3.2. Project Budget Information..
3.3.3. Project Approach..
3.4. Project Roles and Responsibilities..
3.4.1. Roles and Responsibilities...
3.4.2. Responsibility Assignment Matrix...
4. Team Contract..
4.1. Code of Conduct.
4.2. Participation
4.3. Communication...
4.4. Problem Solving..
4.5. Meeting Guidelines.
5. Scope Statement...
5.1. Project Justification.
5.2. Product Characteristics and Requirements.
5.2.1. Minimum requirements to Use Windows XP Professional.
5.2.2. Additional Items or Services Required to Use Certain Windows XP Features...
5.3. Summary of Product Deliverables..
5.3.1. Project Management-Related Deliverables..
5.3.2. Product-Related Deliverables..
5.4. Milestones ..
5.5. Work Breakdown Structure
6. Contingency Plan.
7. Risk Plans.
7.1. Risk Management Plan...
7.2. Risk Response Plan.
7.3. Top Ten Risks in Information Technology.
7.4. Risk Assessment Matrix..
8. Project Communication Plan..
9. Quality Management Plan..
9.1. Quality Planning
9.1.1. IEEE 829..
4
5
5
5
6
6
6
6
6
7
7
7
7
7
8
8
9
11
11
11
11
11
11
12
12
12
12
12
14
14
14
15
16
17
17
17
17
17
18
18
20
20
20
20
20
21
21
21
21
21
21
22
22
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
39
Tables
Table 1: Roles and Responsibilities...
Table 2: Responsibility Assignment Matrix...
Table 3: Project Schedule.
Table 4: Milestones...
Table 5: Risk Assessment Matrix..
Table 6: Communication Plan..
Table 7: Windows XP Migration Cost Analysis
8
9
10
15
18
19
24
Figures
Figure 1: Work Breakdown Structure... 16
Figure 2: Testing Process. 22
1. Executive Summary
Bank of America has just incorporated 60,000 new employees with the merger of Fleet
Boston. Many of the banks long-time employees, and newly acquired employees, work on
various types of hardware (laptops and desktops) with different operating systems. The CEO of
Technology and Operations within the bank recognizes a need to consolidate all the different
operating systems down to only one: Microsoft Windows XP. His vision is to reduce processes,
cut costs, and follow Six Sigma to the letter. With his support, and the support of other senior
managers and business managers, a budget was set aside for the testing and migration of
Windows XP to all bank PCs. Therefore, a project needed to be created to realize his vision.
The purpose of the Windows XP Migration project is to bring about more PC security and
reliability by upgrading all desktop and laptop computers within Differentiated Service Platform
Engineering at Bank of America with one supportable operating system.
3. Project Overview
3.1. Business Case
Differentiated Service at Bank of America supports five different client operating
systems, and also supports over 78,000 employees. Security, reliability, and remote
troubleshooting of all five operating systems are extremely costly. With the Windows XP
Migration Project, the bank is seeking to reduce support costs while enhancing the user
computing experience. By consolidating the five operating systems down to one, Windows XP,
this project expects to provide savings in deployment at more than 60 percent, and overall
operating-cost savings at 22 percent per year (yielding a savings of over $330,000 per year) over
the next four years.
extend to Pocket PCs, mobile phones, and other smart devices enabling more flexible working.
3.2.5. Return on Investment
Significant improvements to reliability, performance, and manageability witnessed in
Windows XP will ensure it offers an equal, if not better, return on investment compared to
Windows 2000.
Once all workstations are in line with one operating system (Windows XP), "oneness" for
the bank will finally be achieved. To put this project into action, a Project Charter must be
developed. The Charter discusses project objectives, beginning and ending dates for the project,
budget information, approaches, along with roles and responsibilities of the project members.
3.3. Project Charter
The Project Charters title is Windows XP Migration. The overall schedule of the project
from start to completion is January 18, 2004 to July 9, 2004.
3.3.1. Project Objectives
The objectives of the project are to migrate all laptops and desktops to Windows XP, and
upgrade all hardware\software to work with Windows XP for all Differentiated Service (DS)
employees (approximately 18,000, with an additional 60,000 from the Fleet Boston merger)
within 6 months based on new corporate standards.
3.3.2. Project Budget Information
A total of $1,500,000.00 is allocated to the Windows XP Migration project for resources
that include, project managers, team leads, testers, and other essential personnel labor costs. The
finances for upgrading the actual hardware of over 78,000 desktops, laptops, and servers, does
not come out of this budget, and will not be considered for this project.
3.3.3. Project Approach
Audit all Differentiated Service hardware and software to determine upgrade needs for
compatibility with Windows XP
Develop an initial plan to identify project manager, project team, and stakeholders
Prepare business case to identify reasons\risks for migrating to Windows XP
If not already existing, develop standards, testing and migration processes, along with test
cases for testing Line-of-Business (LOB) applications on hardware platforms migrated to
Windows XP
Decide on whether to lease or buy new PC hardware upgrades
Test all Vendor or Internally installed PCs with the new Windows XP operating system
Ensure Software Distribution of (LOB) applications function on Windows XP
Provide a Benefits measurement (security, speed, ease of use, etc.) of using Windows XP
over the previously installed OS
7
Name
Organization/
Position
Contact
Information
Project Manager
Dan Thomasson
704-396-7965
Team Manager
Kristin Clark
925-435-6233
Vendor
John Franc
Compaq (PCs/Laptops)
704-537-1822
Team Member
Team Member
Team Member
Team Member
Software
Distribution
Release
Management
Change
Management
Application
Integration
Jim Farkas
Lee Huntinsger
Pete Mikalatos
Russ Eddy
Anthony Scavo
DS-East QA Tester
DS-East QA Tester
DS-West QA Tester
DS-West QA Tester
DS-East SD Analyst
704-396-7963
704-397-1034
925-435-6235
925-435-6237
704-398-1028
Judy Ferrara
DS-East RM
704-397-3254
Tracy Wells
DS-West CM
925-435-6239
Lisa Sedberry
DS-East AI Manager
704-396-4233
Clients
Project
Manager
s
AS
AS
AS
AS
AS
AS
Team
Manager
s
P
P
P
P
P
P
Standards &
Process
Developers
I
I
I
I
IP
IP
Hardware
Upgraders
Testers
Software
Distributors
P
I
IP
I
I
I
P
P
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
IP
I
P
I
I
I
I
S
S
IP
IP
S
AS
AS
I
I
IRS
I
P
P
IP
I
IRP
AR
I
IP
IP
I
API
IP
I
P
IP
I
I
P
IP
I
I
I
IP
IP
I
P
AIPR
P
IP
I
I
S
S
IS
I
I
R
R
R
I
I
I
AIPR
AIPR
I
IP
IP
I
P
P
AIP
IP
IP
I
S
S
S
I
I
IR
APRS
SR
R
A
I
IP
I
AR
R
I
IP
I
AR
R
AIP
I
I
R
R
P
I
I
RP
R
I
AIP
I
R
R
S
S
S
S
S
S
P = Participant
APRS
SR
R = Review Required
I = Input Required
S= Sign-off Required
5 days
1 day
2 days
5 days
5 days
15 days
1 day
10 days
5 days
10 days
2 days
1 day
1 day
1 day
2 days
1 day
2 days
90 days
3 days
10 days
50 days
15 days
15 days
15 days
50 days
30 days
60 days
50 days
5 days
10 days
20 days
125 days
125 days
5 days
2 days
2 days
1 day
1/19/2004 8:00
1/19/2004 8:00
1/19/2004 8:00
1/19/2004 8:00
1/19/2004 8:00
1/19/2004 8:00
1/19/2004 8:00
1/26/2004 8:00
1/19/2004 8:00
1/19/2004 8:00
1/19/2004 8:00
1/19/2004 8:00
1/19/2004 8:00
1/19/2004 8:00
1/19/2004 8:00
1/19/2004 8:00
1/19/2004 8:00
1/19/2004 8:00
1/19/2004 8:00
1/19/2004 8:00
1/19/2004 8:00
1/19/2004 8:00
2/9/2004 8:00
2/9/2004 8:00
1/19/2004 8:00
1/19/2004 8:00
3/1/2004 8:00
3/1/2004 8:00
5/10/2004 8:00
5/10/2004 8:00
1/19/2004 8:00
1/19/2004 8:00
1/19/2004 8:00
7/5/2004 8:00
7/5/2004 8:00
7/7/2004 8:00
7/9/2004 8:00
10
1/23/2004 17:00
1/19/2004 17:00
1/20/2004 17:00
1/23/2004 17:00
1/23/2004 17:00
2/6/2004 17:00
1/19/2004 17:00
2/6/2004 17:00 9
1/23/2004 17:00
1/30/2004 17:00
1/20/2004 17:00
1/19/2004 17:00
1/19/2004 17:00
1/19/2004 17:00
1/20/2004 17:00
1/21/2004 17:00
1/20/2004 17:00
5/21/2004 17:00
1/21/2004 17:00
1/30/2004 17:00
3/26/2004 17:00
2/6/2004 17:00
2/27/2004 17:00 22
2/27/2004 17:00 22
3/26/2004 17:00
2/27/2004 17:00
5/21/2004 17:00 26
5/7/2004 17:00 22,24
5/14/2004 17:00 28
5/21/2004 17:00 28
2/13/2004 17:00
7/9/2004 17:00
7/9/2004 17:00
7/9/2004 17:00
7/6/2004 17:00
7/8/2004 17:00 35
7/9/2004 17:00 36
4. Team Contract
The Team Contract will consist of the project name: Windows XP
Migration, and a sign-off list of project team members as previously shown in
Table 1: Roles and Responsibilities. The following bulleted list comes from
Table 3-6: Team Contract in Chapter 3, page 82 of Information Technology
Project Management by Kathy Schwalbe, and will be incorporated into the
Windows XP Migration project.
4.1. Code of Conduct: As a project team, we will:
Decide as a team on the best way to communicate. Since a few team members cannot
meet often for face-to-face meetings, we will use e-mail, a project Web site, and other
technology to assist in communicating
Have the project manager facilitate all meetings and arrange for phone and
videoconferences, as needed
Work together to create the project schedule and enter actuals into our enterprise-wide
project management system by 4 PM every Friday
Present ideas clearly and concisely
Keep discussions on track and have one discussion at a time
11
Plan to have a face-to-face meeting the first and third Tuesday morning of every month
Meet more frequently the first month
Arrange for telephone or videoconferencing for participants as needed
Hold other meetings as needed
Record meeting minutes and send them out via e-mail within 24 hours of all project
meetings, focusing on decisions made and action items from each meeting
Develop an agenda before all meetings with our project sponsor and client advisors
Document major issues and decisions related to the project and send them out via e-mail
to all team members and the project sponsor
5. Scope Statement
5.1. Project Justification
Over $330,000 can be saved annually for the next four years by going to one operating
system. Instead of training Help Desk analysts on five different operating systems, they would
only need to learn one: Windows XP. Besides increasing system security and reliability, there
are several good reasons to justify the Windows XP Migration Project. See the benefits of
upgrading to Windows XP in sections 3.2 and 10.2 of this paper.
5.2. Product Characteristics and Requirements
5.2.1. Minimum requirements to Use Windows XP Professional
PC with 300 megahertz or higher processor clock speed recommended; 233 MHz
minimum required (single or dual processor system);* Intel Pentium/Celeron family, or
AMD K6/Athlon/Duron family, or compatible processor recommended
128 megabytes (MB) of RAM or higher recommended (64 MB minimum supported; may
limit performance and some features)
12
Some Internet functionality may require Internet access, a Microsoft .NET Passport
account, and payment of a separate fee to a service provider; local and/or longdistance telephone toll charges may apply
2. For networking:
Network adapter appropriate for the type of local-area, wide-area, wireless, or home
network you wish to connect to, and access to an appropriate network infrastructure;
access to third-party networks may require additional charges
3. For instant messaging, voice and videoconferencing, and application sharing, both
parties need:
Microsoft .NET Passport account and Internet access or Microsoft Exchange 2000 Server
instant messaging account and network access (some configurations may require
download of additional components)
4. For voice and videoconferencing, both parties also need:
Windows XP
Windows XP
13
8 MB of video RAM
The various hardware platforms are divided into two groups: 1. Laptops and 2. Desktops,
and are further divided by vendor types:
1. Laptops:
a. Toshiba 7200CT
14
b.
c.
d.
e.
f.
g.
Toshiba 7200CTe
Toshiba 8100
Toshiba 8200
IBM T21
IBM T23
IBM T40
2. Desktops:
a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
f.
g.
Dell 450
Dell 530
Compaq EN800
Compaq 1Gig
Compaq EVO 330
Compaq EVO 500
Compaq EVO 530
5.4. Milestones
The following legend should be used for the Milestones in Table 4.
C = Clients
HU = Hardware Upgraders
PD = Process Developer
PM = Project Manger
SD = Software Distributors
TM = Team Manager
T = Testers
V = Vendors
ALL = All the above
Table 4: Milestones
Milestone
Initiating
Determine/assign project manager
Identify key stakeholders
Prepare business case
Prepare project charter
Planning
Hold project kickoff meeting
Prepare team contract
Prepare scope statement
Prepare WBS
Prepare schedule and cost baseline
Determine task resources
Determine task durations
Date
Status
Responsible
1/19/2004
1/20/2004
1/23/2004
1/23/2004
100%
100%
100%
100%
PM
PM
PM, TM
PM, TM, C
1/19/2004
2/6/2004
1/23/2004
1/30/2004
1/19/2004
1/19/2004
1/19/2004
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
ALL
PM, TM
PM
PM
PM, TM
PM, TM
PM, TM
15
Issues/Comments
1/19/2004
1/20/2004
1/21/2004
1/19/2004
100%
100%
100%
100%
PM, TM
PM
PM
ALL
1/21/2004
1/30/2004
3/26/2004
2/6/2004
2/27/2004
2/27/2004
3/26/2004
2/27/2004
5/21/2004
5/7/2004
5/14/2004
5/21/2004
2/13/2004
100%
100%
98%
100%
100%
100%
98%
100%
50%
60%
60%
50%
100%
TM, T, C
C
PD
PD
PD, T
PD, HU
T
V
T
V, T
HU
SD
PM, TM, V
7/9/2004
50%
PM, TM, V,
T, HU
7/5/2004
7/8/2004
7/9/2004
0%
0%
0%
PM, TM
PM
ALL
16
Windows XP
Migration Project
Initiating
Planning
Executing
Controlling
Closing
Select Project
Manager
Hold Project
Kickoff Meeting
Survey
Status Reports
Prepare Final
Project Report
Form Project
Team
Prepare Team
Contract
User Inputs
East-West
Communications
Prepare Final
Presentation
Identify Key
Stakeholders
Prepare Scope
Statement
Standards &
Processes
Prepare Business
Case
Prepare Schedule
& Cost Baseline
Hardware
Upgrades
Prepare Project
Charter
Identify, Discuss,
& Prioritize Risks
Document
Lessons Learned
XP Testing
Software
Distribution
Benefits
Measurement
Figure 1: WBS
6. Contingency Plan
Additional days and funds will be set aside for the Windows XP Migration Project to act
as a buffer in case of project completion delays. The total timeframe for project completion is
six months, or 180 days. The actual work to complete the testing and migration of Windows XP
has been calculated to be 120 actual days based on previous migration projects. Therefore, 60
additional days can be used to mitigate possible risks of project delays.
In the case where certain departments do not receive the requested hardware upgrades by
the vendor on the date that Windows XP is to be installed, contingency plans are set in place to
have an alternate hardware vendor deliver the PCs.
7. Risk Plans
17
Delaying your regular refresh cycle for desktop and notebook PCs in an effort to save
money
2 Using a desktop PC as a server.
3 Installing unauthorized wireless access points in a company building.
4 Using outdated or manual data storage methods as your primary data backup solution.
5 Giving employees the wrong machines for their jobs.
6 Maintaining multiple images in the client PC base.
7 Using illegal, unauthorized, pirated, or shared software.
8 Operating and maintaining multiple servers without considering consolidation.
9 Modifying or replacing internal PC hardware components to achieve better performance.
10 Sharing work e-mail addresses and other sensitive information on the Internet.
7.4. Risk Assessment Matrix (RAM)
Table 5: Risk Assessment Matrix (RAM)
Ranking
1
2
Potential Risk
Inadequate Planning
Poor definition of XP
Migration Project
Severity
H
M
Impact
4
3
18
Insufficient testing
staff.
Under-estimated costs
because of Fleet
Boston merger.
Insufficient Time
Estimates
Unable to order
hardware (PCs)
in time for migration
of XP
Project managers should also develop a strategy for making sure project deliverables are
conveyed to the right target audience using the most efficient delivery mechanism. To
accomplish this task, the project manager could prepare a Project Communication Plan as in
Table 6. This communication plan relates to the Windows XP Migration project.
Table 6 Project Communication Plan
Deliverable
Type
Target
Audience(s)
Who
Responsible?
19
Delivery
Method
Delivery
Frequency
Business Case
Mandatory
Project Charter
Mandatory
Shareholders,
CEO
Project Team
Project
Manager
Project
Manager
Project Team
Team Contract
Mandatory
Project Team
Scope Statement
Informational
Project Team
WBS
Mandatory
Project Team
Schedule and
Cost Baseline
Gantt Chart
Mandatory
Informational
Project Team,
CEO
Project Team
Survey
Informational
Clients
Team Managers
Standards
Informational
Project Team
Testing
Processes
Informational
Testing Team
Migration
Processes
Templates and
Test Scripts
Benefits
Measurement
Status Reports
Informational
Clients
Standards
Developer
Testing
Manager,
Testers
XP Upgraders
Informational
Testing Team
Testers
Informational
Mandatory
Shareholders,
CEO
Project Manager,
Shareholders,
CEO
Final Project
Report
Mandatory
CEO
Project
Manager
Project
Manager,
Team
Managers,
Testers
Project
Manager
Final Project
Presentation
Mandatory
CEO
Lessons-learned
Report
Informational
Company
Project
Manager
Project
Manager
Project
Manager
Project
Manager
Formal
Presentation
Formal
Presentation
Formal
Presentation
Intranet,
E-mail
Intranet,
Email
Intranet,
E-mail
Intranet,
E-mail
Intranet,
E-mail,
Fax,
Snail Mail
Intranet
Once
Once
Once
Once
Once
Weekly
Once with
occasional
updates.
On-going
throughout
project
Once
Intranet
Once
Intranet
Once
Intranet,
E-mail
Formal,
Presentation
Intranet,
E-mail,
Formal
Presentations
On-going
Formal
Presentation
Once
Project
Manager
Formal
Presentation
Once
Project
Manager
Intranet
E-mail
Once
Once
Weekly
project deadlines specified in the Project Charter and Project Plan. We will achieve these goals
through the following processes: quality planning, quality assurance, and quality control.
9.1. Quality Planning
Within quality planning, we will use the following standards: IEEE 829 Software
Documentation, Capability Maturity Model (CMM), and ISO 9001.
9.1.1. IEEE 829
IEEE 829-1998 Standard for Software Test Documentation provides a standard set of test
documents and templates that can be used by the technical community. Such documents are
frequently implemented into the working environment as checklists or guidelines for specific
testing processes. The basic emphasis of this standard is on test planning, test specification, and
test reporting.
9.1.2. CMM
One of the main methodologies used today for helping developers and testers improve
their application development and software-testing processes comes from a process maturity
framework called Capability Maturity Model (CMM). This model originated from the Software
Engineering Institute (SEI) at Carnegie-Mellon University in 1986. The CMM model defines
five levels of software maturity for an organization: 1) Initial, 2) Repeatable, 3) Defined, 4)
Managed, and 5) Optimizing.
9.1.3. ISO 9001
The International Organization for Standardization (ISO) provides over 13,700
International Standards for business, government and society. Our project team will use
ISO 9001:2000 Quality management systems: Requirements.
9.2. Quality Assurance
For quality assurance, our focus is on software testing as it pertains to Windows XP,
applications running on XP, and hardware platforms using XP. We will periodically evaluate the
overall project performance to ensure the project will satisfy the relevant quality standards that
include IEEE 730 and IEEE Stoneman.
9.2.1. IEEE 730
IEEE 730-2002 Standard for Software Quality Assurance Plans discusses standards,
practices, conventions, and metrics for software quality. It incorporates subjects covering basic
technical, design, and other programming activities by developers. Such activities include
writing documentation, defining variable and module names, executing code inspections, and
testing their products.
9.2.2. IEEE Stoneman
21
The IEEE Stoneman (version 0.7) Software Engineering Body of Knowledge (SWEBOK)
is an excellent standard for software developers and testers. Chapters 5 and 11 are very useful.
Chapter 5, Software Testing, describes the testing process that encompasses:
22
23
# of Resources
# of Hours
Total
Project Managers
$85.00
1040
$176,800.00
Team Managers
$75.00
1040
$234,000.00
Testers
10
$55.00
750
$412,500.00
XP Installers
$65.00
100
$26,000.00
Software Distributors
$60.00
150
$18,000.00
Standards\Process
Developers
$65.00
250
$48,750.00
Hardware Upgraders
$55.00
100
$22,000.00
Total
$938,050.00
10.2. Benefits
Here is a final overview of some of the benefits that Bank of America will receive after
migrating to Windows XP.
1. Business-level Reliability - Windows XP delivers a new level of stability, so clients can
focus on their work. For example, in most cases, if one program crashes, the clients
computer will keep running.
2. Advanced Performance - Windows XP manages system resources efficiently, meeting
the performance standards set by Windows 2000 and exceeding those set by Windows 98
Second Edition.
3. Remote Desktop - Remote Desktop allows clients to create a virtual session and use their
desktop computer from another computer running Windows 95 or later, giving them
access to all of their data and applications even when they are not in their office.
4. New Task-Based Visual Design Allows clients to access their most commonly used
tasks quickly, because of a cleaner design and new visual cues within Windows XP.
5. Wireless 802.1x Networking Support - Wireless 802.1x Networking Support provides
support for secured access, as well as performance improvements for wireless networks.
6. Windows Messenger - Windows Messenger is the easy way to communicate and
collaborate in real time on a client computer. Clients can see the online status of their
contacts and choose to communicate with them through text, voice, or video with better
performance and higher quality.
24
7. Encrypting File System - Encrypting File System provides a high level of protection
from hackers and data theft by transparently encrypting files with a randomly generated
key.
8. Fast Resume from Hibernation or Standby Clients can save battery power when
working on the road. With Windows XP, their laptop can enter Standby or Hibernate
faster, and it can start working again faster after resuming from Standby or Hibernation.
9. Help and Support Center with Remote Assistance - In addition to a comprehensive set
of documentation, Help and Support Center in Windows XP includes Remote Assistance,
which allows clients to have a friend or IT professional who is also running Windows XP
remotely control their computers to demonstrate a process or help solve a problem.
10. System Restore - If something goes wrong with clients computers, they can revert the
system to a previous state.
Once again, the bottom line for migrating to Windows XP is to save money.
25
Date
Prepared by:
1.0 Introduction/ Background
10.0 Exhibits
Exhibit A: Financial Analysis
26
8%
ROI
0
100
1.00
100
0
1.00
0
(100)
(100)
Year
1
2
100
100
0.93
0.86
93
86
200
0.93
185
200
0.86
171
93
(7)
86
78
44%
Payback before Year X
Assumptions
Enter assumptions here
27
3Total
100
0.79
79
358
200
0.79
159
79
158
515
158
NPV
Approach:
Name
Organization/
Position
Contact
Information
Sign-off: (Signatures of all above stakeholders. Can sign by their names in table above.)
Comments: (Handwritten or typed comments from above stakeholders, if applicable)
28
Introductions of attendees
Background of project
Review of project-related documents (i.e. business case, project request, contract)
Discussion of project organizational structure
Discussion of project scope, time, and cost goals
Discussion of other important topics
List of action items from meeting
Action Item
Assigned To
Due Date
29
.
Product Characteristics and Requirements:
1.
2.
3.
4.
Summary of Project Deliverables
Project management-related deliverables: business case, charter, team contract, scope
statement, WBS, schedule, cost baseline, status reports, final project presentation, final
project report, lessons-learned report, and any other documents required to manage the
project.
Product-related deliverables: research reports, design documents, software code,
hardware, etc.
1.
2.
3.
4.
30
Suggestions/Issues:
Project changes
31
Date:
Date
Status
Responsible
Planning
Executing
Controlling
Closing
32
Issues/Comments
Date:
33
________________________________________________
________________________________________________
I (We), the undersigned, acknowledge and accept delivery of the work completed for this project on behalf of
our organization. My (Our) signature(s) attest to my (our) agreement that this project has been completed.
No further work should be done on this project.
Name
Title
Signature
Date
Yes
No
2. Please provide the main reasons for your satisfaction or dissatisfaction with this project.
3. Please provide suggestions on how our organization could improve its project delivery
capability in the future.
34
Participation: We will:
Communication: We will:
35
Date:
1. Introduction
Project Overview
Project Deliverables
Evolution of the SPMP
Reference Materials
Definitions and Acronyms
2. Project Organization
Process Model
Organizational Structure
Organizational Boundaries and Interfaces
Project Responsibilities
3. Managerial Process
4. Technical Process
Work Packages
Dependencies
Resource Requirements
Budget and Resource Allocation
Schedule
36
37
38
25. 1320.2-1998
IEEE Standard for Conceptual Modeling Language Syntax and Semantics for IDEF1X97
(IDEFobject)
26. 1362-1998
IEEE Guide for Information Technology - System Definition - Concept of Operation
Document
27. 1420.1-1995(R2002) IEEE Standard for Information Technology - Software Reuse - Data Model for Reuse
Library Interoperability: Basic Interoperability Data Model (BIDM)
28. 1420.1a-1996(R2002) IEEE Supplement to Standard for Information Technology - Software Reuse - Data
Model or Reuse Library Interoperability: Asset Certification Framework
29. 1420.1b-1999(R2002) IEEE Supplement to IEEE Standard for Information Technology -Software Reuse - Data
Model for Reuse Library Interoperability: Intellectual Property Rights Framework
30. 1462-1998
[Adoption of International Standard ISO/IEC 14102:1995(E)], Information technology Guideline for the evaluation and selection of CASE tools
31. 1465-1998
[Adoption of ISO/IEC 12119: 1994(E)], IEEE Standard Adoption of International
Standard ISO/IEC 12119: 1994(E) Information Technology - Software packages Quality
requirements and testing
32. 1471-2000
IEEE Recommended Practice for Architectural Description of Software-Intensive
Systems
33. 1490-1998
IEEE Guide (IEEE) - Adoption of PMI Standard- A Guide to the Project Management
Body of Knowledge (PMI)
34. 1517-1999
IEEE Standard for Information Technology - Software Life Cycle Processes - Reuse
Processes
35. 2001-2002
IEEE Recommended Practice for the Internet-Web Site Engineering, Web Site
Management, and Web Site Life Cycle
36. 1540-2001
IEEE Standard for Software Life Cycle Processes-Risk Management
37. J-Std-016-1995
EIA/IEEE Interim Standard for Information Technology Software Life Cycle Processes Software Development Acquirer-Supplier Agreement (Issued for Trial Use)
38. 12207.0-1996
IEEE/EIA Standard: Industry Implementation of International Standard ISO/IEC
12207:1995 Standard for Information Technology - Software Life Cycle Processes.
40. 12207.1-1997
IEEE/EIA Standard: Industry Implementation of International Standard ISO/IEC
12207:1995 Standard for Information Technology - Software Life Cycle Processes - Life
cycle data
41. 12207.2-1997
IEEE/EIA Standard: Industry Implementation of International Standard ISO/IEC
12207:1995 Standard for Information Technology - Software Life Cycle Processes
Implementation considerations
42. 14143.1-2000
Implementation Note for IEEE Adoption of ISO/IEC 14143- 1:1998, Information
Technology - Software Measurement - Functional Size Measurement - Part 1: Definition
of Concept
39
References
Bertolino, A. (2000, April). Chapter 5, software testing. IEEE Stoneman (Version 0.7), The
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc., pp. 1-18.
CarnegieMellon. Capability Maturity Model for Software. Retrieved February 3, 2004,
from http://www.sei.cmu.edu/cmm/cmm.html
IEEE. (1998). Standard for software test documentation. ANSI/IEEE 829. New York: ANSI.
IEEE. (2000). Software Engineering Body of Knowledge (SWEBOK). ANSI/IEEE Stoneman
(version 0.7). New York: ANSI.
IEEE. (2002). Standard for reviews. ANSI/IEEE 1028. New York: ANSI.
IEEE. (2002). Standard for software quality assurance plans. ANSI/IEEE 730. New York:
ANSI.
IEEE. (2003). IEEE Standards Online. Retrieved February 3, 2004,
from http://standards.ieee.org/catalog/olis/se.html
Intel. (2004) Top 10 Technology Risks. Retrieved March 5, 2004,
from http://www.intel.com/business/tech_risks/demo/launch.htm
ISO. (2003). ISO Standards Online. Retrieved February 2, 2004,
from http://www.iso.ch/iso/en/ISOOnline.openerpage
Microsoft. Top 10 Reasons for Moving to Windows XP Professional. Retrieved March 23, 2004,
from http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/pro/evaluation/whyupgrade/top10.asp
Perry, W. E. (2000). Effective methods for software testing (2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley &
Sons.
PMBOK. (2000). PMBOK guide (2000 ed). Pennsylvania: Project Management Institute,
Inc.
Reeker, L., & Wallace, D. (2000, April). Chapter 11, software quality. IEEE Stoneman (Version
0.7), The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc., pp. 1-20.
Schwalbe, K. (2004). Information technology project management (3rd ed.). Canada: Thomas
Learning, Inc.
40