Professional Documents
Culture Documents
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
3.1 INTRODUCTION
Curiosity or inquisitiveness is a distinctive feature of human beings. Curiosity to
know about our self, ones institutions, ones environment, ones planet, other plants, and
the universe in horrent in us. Whenever, people encounter problems, they try to find
solutions to them. Seeking answers to questions and find solution to problems have been
the basis of human progress. A systematic search for an answer to a question or a solution
to a problem is called research.
Research is a purposive investigation. it is an organized inquiry, it is a honest,
exhaustive , intelligent searching for facts and their meaning or implications with reference
to a given problem . It is the process of arriving at dependable solutions to problems
through the planned and systematic collection, analysis and interpretation of data. The best
research is that which is reliable, verifiable, and exhaustive so that it provides information
in which we have confidence. Educational research methods can be categorized on the
basis of end results, data gathering techniques, methods of data processing approach;
source conditions for collection and analysis of data in a manner that aims to combine
relevance to the research purpose with economy in procedure. (Sharma 2006)
3.2 METHODS OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
All research involves the elements of observations, description and analysis of what
happens under certain circumstances. Research use different methods in their research
activities. Usually all studies fall under one or a combination of these types.
Some important methods of research are the following;
1) Historical method
2) Surveys method
3) Experimental method
48
49
The survey method is an organized attempt to analyze, interpret and report the present
status of a social institution or group or areas. It suggests the course of future development.
3.4.1Nature of survey method
The nature of survey method is as follows;
i.
ii.
iii.
iv.
v.
ii.
iii.
It interprets synthesis and integrates data and points out their implications.
iv.
v.
It is the only method through which the researcher can obtain the opinion,
attitude and suggestions for improvements.
5. It is concerned with generalized statistic of the whole population and with the
characteristics of the individuals.
3.4.4 Steps in survey methods
As a problem selected for the present study is concerned with one of the current problems,
the investigator described to employ the survey method for the collection of the data.
According to William wiersma(1985) detailed steps in survey are as follows;
1. Planning
2. Development of application of sampling plan
3. Construction of interview schedule or questionnaire
4. Data collection
5. Translation of data
6. Analysis
7. Conclusion and reporting
Planning
The plan to action has to be drawn up on to ensure scientific and objective merits of
the study. Definition of the problem, operational definitions of variables, review of and
development of the survey design, all such items of plan should be clearly drawn out.
Development and application of sampling plan
The geographical area to be covered, the sample to be selected and detailed
sampling procedures should be defined and formulated.
Construction of interview schedule or questionnaire
The tools of investigation generally used are interview schedule or questionnaire
and the like. Specified investigation should require specified tools of inquiry. If no
readymade tool is available, a suitable one will be prepared in a systematic manner. The
tools should be tested in a pilot study before it is administered to the vast sample.
51
3. Self-confidence tool prepared and validated by Krishna Prasad and Priya. (2001).
3.5.1 Personal Data Sheet
It includes general information about the respondents regarding gender, place of
stay, locality of school, type of school, nature of school, locality of school,
residence, nature of the family, fathers education, mothers education, fathers
occupation, mothers occupation, mothers occupation mothers monthly income,
fathers monthly income.
3.5.2 Description of Intrapersonal Intelligence Questionnaire
The Intrapersonal Intelligence questionnaire tries to find out the Intrapersonal
Intelligence of IX standard students. The investigator has to validate tool which
was prepared by Terry Armstrong (2000).The tool consists of 10 items. Each item
measures the Intrapersonal intelligence of the students. The entire 10 item are
positive only each item has 3 responses. The represent has to put a tick mark in any
one of the answers.
Establishing content validity
To establish the validity, the standardized was given to some experts in St.Xaviers
College of Education. The investigator got the appraisal. According to the suggestions
given by them, some of the items were modified. Thus, the content validity has been
established.
Establishing reliability
The tool was administered adopted for establishing reliability. To randomly select
50 high school students. The students response was scored. The same tool were
53
administered to the same set of students after 15 days when both sets of scores were
correlated; it was found out that the correlation coefficient was 0.68 between the two sets
of scores. Thus the reliability of the tool was established.
Scoring
The tool consists of 10 items. It is 3 point scale. The scoring of the scale is given below.
TABLE 3.1
SCORING KEY-INTRAPERSONAL INTELLIGENCE
Response
Scoring
Establish the reliability of the tool, the investigator followed the test and retest
method. After constructing the drafted tool, the investigator administered the tool to the 50
high school students in St.Xaviers higher secondary school, palayamkottai. After the gap
of 15 days the investigator again administered the tool to the same students. The score
obtained from the two tests were analyzed and found to be correlated to each other. The
reliability of the tool was found to be 0.635. Thus the reliability of the tool was established.
TABLE 3.2
DISTRIBUTION OF THE SELF CONFIDENCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Name of the items
Item numbers
Positive
1,2,3,6,7,8,9,11,12,17,18,31,33,35
,38,39,40,43,45,46,47,48,49,50
Negative
4,5,10,13,15,16,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27
,
28,29,30,32,34,36,37,41,42,44
TABLE 3.3
SCORING KEY SELF CONFIDENCE
Response
Some time
Never
Always
Positive statement
Negative statement
The investigator approached the heads of the institution and sought permission for
the data collection. After getting permission from the heads of the institution, the
investigator herself with the help of the teacher
tools. Before administering the tools to the students, they were given clear instruction to
answer the items given in the inventories. The investigator clarified the need and purpose
of the collection, necessary information needed to answer the questionnaire and about the
confidentiality of the data supplied by them. Then the inventories were collected from the
respondents. They were scored with the help of the scored with the help of the scoring key
provided by the author of the inventory.
3.7 POPULATION AND SAMPLE
Population for the study
A population refers to any collection of specified group of human beings or non-human
entities. In the present study, the population consisted of the high school students studying
in IX standard in Sathankulam Educational District.
Sample for the study
A small proportion of a population, selected for the observation and analysis is known as
sample. The method of sampling is based on the nature of the problem, size of the
universe, availability of finance and personnel. According to John W.Best and James V.
Kahn (1980) a sample is a small proportion of a population selected for observation and
analysis. The investigator has randomly selected 300 high school students from
Sathankulam Educational district for the present study.
TABLE 3.4
56
Number of
O
1
Percentage
students
St. Joesph Girls Higher Secondary School,
30
10
Sathankulam
2
30
10
30
10
30
10
30
10
10
Sathankulam
4
St.
Mary
Higher
Secondary
School,
30
Secondary
School,
30
Pothakalanveli
7
St.
Annes
Higher
Thatarmadam
8
Government
10
Higher
Secondary
School,
30
10
Higher
Secondary
School,
30
10
30
10
Sundancoodu
9
Government
Padukapathu
10
Sathankulam
TABLE 3.5
DISTRIBUTION OF THE SAMPLE WITH RESPECT TO BACKGROUND
VARIABLES
S.NO
BACKGROUND
VARIABLES
CATEGORY
57
NO OF
STUDENTS
PERCENTAGE
Sex
Boys
Nature of school
Medium of instruction
Locality of school
Type of school
6
7
151
50.3
Girls
149
49.7
Male
30
10
Female
30
10
Both
240
80
Tamil
245
81.6
English
55
18.3
Urban
121
40.3
Rural
179
59.7
Govt
91
30.3
Aided
154
51.3
Private
55
18.3
220
73.3
Nature
accommodation
of Days scholar
Hostel
80
26.6
Nature of family
Nuclear
211
20.3
Joint
89
29.6
58
Moderate level
Low level
2) Arithmetic Mean
It is defined as the quality obtained by adding together all given items and by
dividing
The investigator has used the following formula for calculating arithmetic mean,
M=
X
N
Where,
M = Arithmetic mean
= Sum of Scores
X = Individual score
N = Number of items
3) Standard Deviation
The investigator has used the following formula for calculating standard deviation.
1
N x 2( x)2
S.D = N
59
Where,
S.D = Standard deviation
X = individual score
x2 = Sum of scores
x = Sum of scores
N = Total number of items
4) t Test
M 1 M
t=
2
1
S S 22
+
N1 N2
Where,
M1 = Mean of the first group
M2= Mean of the second group
S1 = Standard deviation of the first group
S2 = Standard deviation of the second group
N1 = Number of cases in the first group
N2 = Number of cases in the second group
5) ANOVA Test
Analysis of variance has been used to find out the difference among the variables.
60
Where,
= Sum of
X2 = Chi- Square
O = Observed frequency
E = Expected frequency
7) Karl Pearsons Product Moment Correlation
Karl Pearsons Product Moment correlation is used to determine relationship
between two or more paired variables. The degree of relationship between Intrapersonal
intelligence and Self-Confidence is measured by the co-efficient of correlation.
Nxy (x )( y)
Nx (x ) 2 Ny 2 (y) 2
2
61
Where,
N
Number of scores
x2
y2
xy
Co-efficient
62