Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Unit I: Introduction
Page 1 of 20
Unit I: Introduction
Page 2 of 20
Unit I: Introduction
Page 3 of 20
Unit I: Introduction
Page 4 of 20
Battery swapping
There is another way to "refuel" electric vehicles. Instead of recharging them from electric
socket, batteries could be mechanically replaced on special stations just in a couple of minutes
(battery swapping).
Batteries with greatest energy density such as metal-air fuel cells usually cannot be recharged
in purely electric way. Instead some kind of metallurgical process is needed, such as aluminum
smelting and similar.
Silicon-air, aluminum-air and other metal-air fuel cells look promising candidates for swap
batteries. Any source of energy, renewable or non-renewable, could be used to remake used
metal-air fuel cells with relatively high efficiency. Investment in infrastructure will be needed. The
cost of such batteries could be an issue, although they could be made with replaceable anodes
and electrolyte.
Other in-development technologies
Conventional electric double-layer capacitors are being worked to achieve the energy density of
lithium ion batteries, offering almost unlimited lifespans and no environmental issues. High-K
electric double-layer capacitors, such as EEStor's EESU, could improve lithium ion energy
density several times over if they can be produced. Lithium-sulphur batteries offer 250Wh/kg.
Sodium-ion batteries promise 400Wh/kg with only minimal expansion/contraction during
charge/discharge and a very high surface area.[27] Researchers from one of the Ukrainian state
universities claim that they have manufactured samples of supercapacitor based on
intercalation process with 318 W-h/kg specific energy, which seem to be at least two times
improvement in comparison to typical Li-ion batteries.[28]
Advantages and disadvantages of electric vehicles: Environmental
Due to efficiency of electric engines as compared to combustion engines, even when the
electricity used to charge electric vehicles comes from a CO2 emitting source, such as a coal or
gas fired powered plant, the net CO2 production from an electric car is typically one half to one
third of that from a comparable combustion vehicle.
Electric vehicles release almost no air pollutants at the place where they are operated. In
addition, it is generally easier to build pollution control systems into centralized power stations
than retrofit enormous numbers of cars.
Electric vehicles typically have less noise pollution than an internal combustion engine vehicle,
whether it is at rest or in motion. Electric vehicles emit no tailpipe CO2 or pollutants such as
NOx, NMHC, CO and PM at the point of use.
Electric motors don't require oxygen, unlike internal combustion engines; this is useful for
submarines.
While electric and hybrid cars have reduced tailpipe carbon emissions, the energy they
consume is sometimes produced by means that have environmental impacts. For example, the
Unit I: Introduction
Page 5 of 20
Unit I: Introduction
Page 6 of 20
Unit I: Introduction
Page 7 of 20
Unit I: Introduction
Page 8 of 20
Unit I: Introduction
Page 9 of 20
Unit I: Introduction
20
Page 10 of
Unit I: Introduction
20
Page 11 of
Unit I: Introduction
20
Page 12 of
Unit I: Introduction
20
Page 13 of
Unit I: Introduction
20
Page 14 of
Unit I: Introduction
20
Page 15 of
propulsion
Unit I: Introduction
20
Page 16 of
Unit I: Introduction
20
Page 17 of
than on speed or distance traveled. Traditional rail is subject to the wear and tear of
miles of friction on mechanical systems and increases exponentially with speed, unlike
maglev systems. This basic difference is the huge cost difference between the two
modes and also directly affects system reliability, availability and sustainability.
All-Weather Operations: Maglev trains currently in operation are not stopped, slowed,
or have their schedules affected by snow, ice, severe cold, rain or high winds. This
cannot be said for traditional friction-based rail systems. Also, maglev vehicles
accelerate and decelerate faster than mechanical systems regardless of the slickness of
the guideway or the slope of the grade because they are non-contact systems.
Backwards Compatibility: Maglev trains currently in operation are not compatible with
conventional track, and therefore require all new infrastructure for their entire route, but
this is not a negative if high levels of reliability and low operational costs are the goal. By
contrast conventional high speed trains such as the TGV are able to run at reduced
speeds on existing rail infrastructure, thus reducing expenditure where new
infrastructure would be particularly expensive (such as the final approaches to city
terminals), or on extensions where traffic does not justify new infrastructure. However,
this "shared track approach" ignores mechanical rail's high maintenance requirements,
costs and disruptions to travel from periodic maintenance on these existing lines. The
use of a completely separate maglev infrastructure more than pays for itself with
dramatically higher levels of all-weather operational reliability and almost insignificant
maintenance costs. So, maglev advocates would argue against rail backward
compatibility and its concomitant high maintenance needs and costs.
Efficiency: Due to the lack of physical contact between the track and the vehicle,
maglev trains experience no rolling resistance, leaving only air resistance and
electromagnetic drag, potentially improving power efficiency.
Weight: The weight of the electromagnets in many EMS and EDS designs seems like a
major design issue to the uninitiated. A strong magnetic field is required to levitate a
maglev vehicle. For the Transrapid, this is about 56 watts per ton. Another path for
levitation is the use of superconductor magnets to reduce the energy consumption of the
electromagnets, and the cost of maintaining the field. However, a 50-ton Transrapid
maglev vehicle can lift an additional 20 tons, for a total of 70 tones, which surprisingly
does not consume an exorbitant amount of energy. Most energy use for the TRI is for
propulsion and overcoming the friction of air resistance. At speeds over 100 mph, which
is the point of a high-speed maglev, maglevs use less energy than traditional fast trains.
Noise: Because the major source of noise of a maglev train comes from displaced air,
maglev trains produce less noise than a conventional train at equivalent speeds.
However, the psychoacoustic profile of the maglev may reduce this benefit: a study
concluded that maglev noise should be rated like road traffic while conventional trains
have a 5-10 dB "bonus" as they are found less annoying at the same loudness level.
Design Comparisons: Braking and overhead wire wear have caused problems for the
Fastech 360 railed Shinkansen. Maglev would eliminate these issues. Magnet reliability
at higher temperatures is a countervailing comparative disadvantage (see suspension
types), but new alloys and manufacturing techniques have resulted in magnets that
maintain their levitational force at higher temperatures.
As with many technologies, advances in linear motor design have addressed the limitations
noted in early maglev systems. As linear motors must fit within or straddle their track over the
full length of the train, track design for some EDS and EMS maglev systems is challenging for
anything other than point-to-point services. Curves must be gentle, while switches are very long
Unit I: Introduction
20
Page 18 of
Unit I: Introduction
20
Page 19 of
Unit I: Introduction
20
Page 20 of