Professional Documents
Culture Documents
28 (2003) 83114
www.elsevier.com/locate/ppolysci
Abstract
Hybrid inorganic organic materials are promising systems for a variety of applications due to their extraordinary
properties based on the combination of the different building blocks. The combination of nanoscale inorganic moieties
with organic polymers has a high potential for future applications and has therefore attracted a lot of attention during the
last years. Since there are countless different combinations of the two moieties, there are also a large number of
methodologies to combine them in one material. This review is written with the intention to give an overview of
principal concepts of the preparation of such materials for different applications. It focuses on the chemical aspects of the
incorporation of inorganic building blocks such as silica networks, porous materials, metals, etc. into an organic
polymeric matrix. q 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Hybrid materials; Nanocomposites; Polymers; Nanoparticles
Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2. Interpenetrating networks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2.1. Sol gel process in presence of preformed polymer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2.2. Polymerization in sol gel networks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2.3. Simultaneous formation of interpenetrating networks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2.4. Dual network precursors. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3. Incorporation of metals and metal complexes in polymers by coordination interactions . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.1. Coordination of metals to the polymer backbone . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.2. Metal-coordinated monomers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.3. Metal-centered polymers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4. Intercalation in 2D layered materials . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
5. Intercalation in 3D frameworks: zeolites, molecular sieves and M41S-materials . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
6. Incorporation of inorganic particles and clusters. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
6.1. Incorporation of unmodified particles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
6.2. Encapsulation of particles in a polymer shell . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
6.3. In situ growth of inorganic particles in a polymer matrix . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
6.4. Surface-modification with polymerizable groups . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
6.5. Surface-modification with initiating groups . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
7. Nanoengineering of composite materials . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
8. Applications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
9. Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
84
84
85
87
87
88
89
90
90
90
91
94
95
96
96
97
97
101
103
104
106
84
Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 106
References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 106
1. Introduction
Inorganic organic composite materials are increasingly
important due to their extraordinary properties, which arise
from the synergism between the properties of the components. There are several routes to these materials, but
probably the most prominent one is the incorporation of
inorganic building blocks in organic polymers. These
materials have gained much interest due to the remarkable
change in properties such as mechanical [1], thermal [2 5],
electrical [6], and magnetic [7] compared to pure organic
polymers. The most commonly employed preparation
procedures for these materials are the use of the sol gel
process for the formation of the inorganic network, the
incorporation of preformed dense inorganic structures, such
as clusters and particles, and the formation of hybrids using
porous or layered inorganic materials either by interpenetration of the organic polymers into the voids, or by
exfoliation of the inorganic material. The unique properties
of these materials, such as their high optical transparency, as
well as the lack of data on structure property relationships
at a nanoscale, has led to emerging research in this area.
Most of the efforts are based on well-known macro- or
microcomposites between inorganic moieties and organic
polymers, and expand ideas from this microcosmos to a new
class of materials, called nanocomposites [8]. Expressions
like nanoparticles and nanocomposites seem to be very
trendy, and are often misused in the literature for systems
which do not properly fall under the label nano in the sense
of advertising. Aside from the inappropriate use of the term
nano, there is a strong need to understand the mechanism of
the formation of such materials. Important aspects of the
chemistry involved in the formation of these systems are the
uniformity, phase continuity, domain sizes and the molecular mixing at the phase boundaries, which all have a direct
influence on optical, physical, and mechanical properties
[9]. Owing to numerous papers published on polymer
organic inorganic composite materials, it is impossible to
completely review this field. Therefore, this review will
focus on the most common principal concepts used to
incorporate inorganic systems in the submicron range (up to
a few hundreds of nanometers) into an organic polymeric
matrix, and the resulting properties of such materials. The
reader is referred to the literature cited for a more detailed
description.
While the incorporation of microscale and larger
inorganic fillers into organic polymers is scientifically
well explored, the decrease in size of the inorganic
component into the nano dimension, and the simultaneous
increase of the interfacial area, results in new extraordinary
materials properties which require further investigations.
2. Interpenetrating networks
The formation of interpenetrating networks (IPNs)
between inorganic and organic moieties is carried out either
by a sequential two-step process, wherein a secondary
network is formed in a primary one, or by the simultaneous
formation of the two networks. The resulting materials are
microscopically phase separated, but macroscopically
uniform [12]. Examples of the two-step process include
the creation of an organic polymer penetrating into the pores
of an inorganic porous material, such as a zeolite or
mesoporous amorphous materials, or between the sheets of a
layered lattice, such as a clay mineral. In these cases the
inorganic moiety is a rigid, preformed natural or synthetic
host matrix, with a regular pore or channel structure in the
nanoscale. In another process, an inorganic (crosslinked)
moiety is formed by a polycondensation reaction, and
interpenetrates during this process into an organic polymer.
Difficulties of such an approach are potential incompatibilities between the moieties, leading to phase separation,
and the challenge to find reactions for the formation of the
second network which can be carried out in the presence of
the first one. A major problem arises from the different
stabilities of the materials. While inorganic systems are
thermally quite stable and are often formed at high
temperature, most organic polymers have an upper temperature limit of around 250 8C. Therefore, the synthesis of
hybrid systems requires a strategy wherein the formation of
the components is well-suited to each, e.g. the use of a lowtemperature formation procedure. Hence, classical high
temperature solid-state reactions for the preparation of the
Nomenclature
AA
An
ATRP
BA
bpy
DMAA
DMA
DSC
EA
EO
GLYMO
HEA
HEMA
IPN
MA
MAc
MEMO
MMA
2MOx
NVP
PDMS
PTA
PV
Py
SANS
SAXS
SEM
St
TEOS
TEM
TFEA
TMO
TMOS
Tp
VA
VAc
VE
2VP
4VP
4VPh
acrylamide
aniline
atom transfer radical polymerization
n-butyl acrylate
2,20 -bipyridine
N,N-dimethylacrylamide
dynamic mechanical analysis
differential scanning calorimetry
ethyl acrylate
ethylene oxide
3-glycidoxypropyltrimethoxysilane
2-hydroxyethyl acrylate
2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate
interpenetrating network
methyl acrylate
methacrylic acid
3-methacryloxypropyltrimethoxysilane
methyl methacrylate
2-methyl-2-oxazoline
N-vinylpyrrolidone
polydimethylsiloxane
phenyleneterephthalamide
p-phenylenevinylene
pyrrole
small angle neutron scattering
small angle X-ray scattering
scanning electron microscopy
styrene
tetraethoxysilane
transmission electron microscopy
2,2,2-trifluoroethyl acrylate
tetramethylene oxide
tetramethoxysilane
thiophene
vinyl alcohol
vinylacetate
vinylether
2-vinylpyridine
4-vinylpyridine
4-vinylphenol
85
86
Fig. 1. Different kinds of inorganic organic composite materials. (a) embedding of the inorganic moiety into the organic polymer, (b)
interpenetrating networks (IPNs); with chemical bonds: (c) incorporation of inorganic groups by bonding to the polymer backbone, and (d) dual
inorganicorganic hybrid polymer.
Scheme 1.
87
88
Scheme 2.
Scheme 3.
89
Scheme 4.
trialkoxysilanes. These triethoxysilyl-terminated polyoxazolines were either used to surface-modify silica gels, or for
acid-catalyzed sol gel reactions [63 66].
Unsaturated monomers such as MEMO or styrylethyltrimethoxysilane have been homo- or copolymerized with
methyl methacrylate [67 73], styrene [69,74 76] or
acrylonitrile [77] (Scheme 5). The functionalized polymer
chains were hydrolyzed and cocondensed with TEOS and/or
other precursors for the formation of the inorganic network
via an acid-catalyzed sol gel route. The lack of welldefined glass-transition temperatures for the polymers in the
silica matrix revealed that the polymer chains were
uniformly distributed in the materials. Accordingly, the
poly(MMA) SiO2 as well as the poly(St) SiO2 hybrid
materials had an excellent optical transparency.
The solgel process of transition metals such as titanium,
zirconium, or vanadium is very fast compared to that of
silicon, and therefore a better control over the polycondensation is required to obtain homogeneous composite materials
in a simultaneous inorganic and organic polymerization
reaction. This can be achieved via a partial substitution of
alkoxides groups in the precursors by stronger complexing
ligands such as bidentate systems. As dual network forming
precursors they also have to contain a functional group which
Scheme 5.
90
91
Scheme 6.
92
Scheme 7.
93
Scheme 8.
polymerization techniques subsequently completely separate the layers from each other and/or form the hybrid matrix
material with homogeneously distributed platelets.
The incorporation of preformed polymeric chains from
solution between the sheets of the minerals may also result
in intercalated composite materials. If this procedure is
applied, the polymer has to be soluble in a solvent which can
fill the space between the layers. In most of the cases, a polar
solvent is required which helps to swell the clay and, in
some cases, leads already to a total exfoliation resulting in
solvent dispersed single-sheet colloids. Additives such as
long-chain alkyl amine or ammonium salts can also be used
to separate the layers. Poly(EO) of molecular weight 105 has
been intercalated between the galleries of montmorillonite
using polymer solutions in H2O, MeOH, or acetonitrile
[132]. This study showed that the nature of the solvent is
crucial to facilitate the insertion of organic materials
between the layers. Based on the different polarity of the
solvents, a different degree of swelling is reached and thus
an easier incorporation of the high molecular weight
macromolecules. Water-soluble polymers such as
polydiallylamine [133], poly(NVP) and poly(4VP) [134]
have been intercalated into the layers of different inorganic
materials. Generally, surfactants, such as amphiphilic block
copolymers, can also be used to support the swelling of the
layered material and additionally serve as compatibilizers
between the hydrophilic surface and hydrophobic polymers.
Employing this universal approach, it is possible to combine
94
95
Scheme 9.
96
Scheme 10.
97
Gold nanoparticles were formed within the microdomains of a poly(St)-b-poly(2VP) diblock copolymer in the
presence of additional Py. The polymerization of Py was
effected by HAuCl4, which simultaneously generated Au
nanoparticles [184]. Thus, Au-poly(Py) nanocomposite
core shell particles were formed which was confirmed by
TEM measurements.
Crosslinked polymer matrices were used for the in situ
growth of magnetic g-Fe2O3 nanoparticles. The resulting
nanocomposites were transparent due to the small metal
oxide particle size, and the magnetization of the nanocomposite was greater by more than an order of magnitude than
those of the strongest room-temperature transparent magnets [185,186].
One of the challenges in nanochemistry is the production
of specific nanoscale objects in unlimited quantities. This is
due to the fact that control of the critical nanorange length
means control of new macroscopic properties. Dendrimers
as monodisperse macromolecules can fulfill the demands of
precursors for such materials. Dendritic molecules are
formed by connectors and branching units built around a
small molecule or a linear polymer (core) which leads to a
spherical or rod-like macromolecule. Based on the high
level of synthetic control, these systems are well defined in
their molecular weights as well as in their functionalities.
For example, depending on the final step of the synthesis the
interior and exterior can be very different, e.g. hydrophilic
and hydrophobic. These special properties make dendrimers
ideal systems for hosts in the formation of nanoparticles. In
a typical process of the formation of metal nanoparticles
metal ions are preorganized by the dendrimer molecule and
subsequently immobilized in or on the macromolecule. Size,
shape, size distribution, and surface functionality of the
metal nanoparticles are determined by the dendritic
template as well as by the chemistry of the preorganization
and immobilization process. Mesoscopically ordered hybrid
materials were formed using functional dendrimers and the
titanium oxo cluster [Ti16O16(OEt)32] as nano building
blocks. The two components were crosslinked through
covalent bonds formed by nucleophilic reactions between
the functional tips of the dendrimers and the titanium centers
of the clusters [187].
6.4. Surface-modification with polymerizable groups
Research in this area spans the modification of
commonly used inorganic fillers or particles, up to the
recent commercial availability of a variety of polyhedral
oligomeric silsesquioxanes (POSS), R8Si8O12 nanoclusters
(Scheme 11).
There are two principle possibilities to functionalize the
inorganic species with organic groups: (i) grafting
functional organic groups onto the surface of preformed
clusters or particles, and (ii) in situ functionalization of the
clusters or particles during their formation. The advantage
of the first method is that the inorganic particles can be
98
Scheme 11.
Scheme 12.
99
Fig. 2. Surface-modified oxometallate compounds with (a) titanium or (b) zirconium as metal, and acrylate or methacrylate as polymerizable
group at the surface. These systems were used as crosslinking agents in polymerization reactions.
100
Table 1
Different POSS compounds (RR7Si8O12) as monomers for copolymerizations
R0
Polymerization
Comonomers
Reference
ROMP
[212]
[209]
[210]
[207]
ATRP
[213]
Polyurethane synthesis
[211]
ZieglerNatta
Ethene, propene
[215]
101
Scheme 13.
102
Scheme 14.
2.
group overage from 0.03 up to 0.1 diazo groups per 100 A
This means that only every 30th hydroxy group had reacted.
Poly(St) was grafted from the thus modified surface. It
should be noted that in free radical polymerizations with the
described macroinitiators, polymerization also occurs in the
solution because the surface-attached initiator decomposes
into two radicals from which one initiates polymerization in
solution. A linear dependence between the monomer and
initiator concentration and the polymer coverage was
observed. Termination of the grafting chains occurred due
to the lack of initiating radicals or sterical hindrance at the
surface. The molecular weight of the polymers cleaved from
the surface by HF treatment were up to 1.46 106, while
those of the homopolymers formed in the solution
simultaneously were up to 1.75 106.
In more recent studies, silane-coupling agents such as
alkoxysilanes [219 221] or chlorosilanes [217,218] have
been used to modify the surface of silica particles. For
example, 4,40 -azobis(4-cyanopentanoic acid) was immobilized on the surface of pyrogenic silica via amide bonds
through attached aminophenyltrimethoxysilane. The concentration of diazo groups at the surface reached 0.2 mmol/
g. DSC measurements proved that the stability of the
initiator decreased upon immobilization. Poly(MMA) with a
molecular weight of up to 8.7 105 was grafted from the
surface. The polymerization was highly affected by the
Trommsdorff effect [222] which was also made responsible
for the higher molecular weights of the grafted polymer
compared to the homopolymer.
Polyesters were grafted from various ultrafine inorganic
particles such as silica, titania and ferrite by anionic ring
opening copolymerization of epoxides and cyclic acid
anhydrides [221]. The silica, titania and ferrite particles had
sizes of 16, 120 and 15 nm, respectively, and surface hydroxy
group concentrations of 1.37, 0.77 and 0.55 mmol/g. The
initiating group was a potassium carboxylate, which was
103
Fig. 3. Schematic representation of the formation of structured nano- or mesoporous materials by a self-assembly process of block copolymers.
of nano- and mesostructured materials applying the selfassembly process of block copolymers. A milestone in the
formation of such materials was the discovery that in
addition to single molecules molecular assemblies, found,
for example, in liquid crystals, can be used for templating
inorganic matrices [225]. This supramolecular self-assembly relies on the ability of molecules such as surfactants to
self-assemble into micellar structures that, when concentrated, undergo a second stage of self-organization resulting
in liquid crystalline mesophases. Molecular inorganic
species can cooperatively assemble with these structuredirecting agents (templates) to form the mesoscopically
ordered inorganic backbone of the final material (Fig. 3).
Usually the intention of this preparation route is the
formation of porous, molecular sieve-like materials, which
can be obtained from the nanocomposites by removal of the
polymer template. In addition to the classical ionic
surfactants used, the application of block copolymers as
templates in block-selective solvents is an emerging field in
materials chemistry. The polymeric approach allows for the
extension of the size of the organized domains into larger
scale features, and the possibility to reach morphologies
which cannot easily be obtained with usual surfactants [226,
227]. A plethora of different polymers have already been
used as structure-directing media and therefore only a short
list of examples is given here: polybutadiene-b-poly(vinylpyridinium) [226]; anionic poly(ethylethylene)-b-polystyrenesulfonate [226]; poly(butadiene-b-ethylene oxide) [228];
ABC triblocks [229]; commercially available PEO-based
systems [230 233]. Besides block copolymers hyperbranched macromolecules also showed a structure-directing
ability [234].
The formation of the inorganic network is based, in most
of the cases, on the sol gel process already discussed. The
resulting porous materials attract interests, for example, for
their potential application as ultralow dielectric materials
for advanced microelectronic devices [234,235].
Most of the above-mentioned structured materials are
based on a silicate inorganic network, however, other metal
oxides were also the source of the inorganic framework.
Organically modified aluminosilicate mesostructures were
synthesized from (3-glycidyloxypropyl)trimethoxysilane
and aluminum-sec-butoxide with the use of isoprene
ethylene oxide block copolymers as the structure-directing
molecules [236 239].
104
Another approach to design the morphology on the nanoor mesoscale is the use of a 3D self-assembly of
nanoparticles for the formation of ordered materials in
such a way that the voids between the lattice were filled with
a material forming a rigid network. Two approaches can be
applied: (i) either the template is of organic nature and the
network formation occurs by inorganic processes, or (ii) the
templates are inorganic spheres and a polymer forms
the network. For the first approach mainly latex colloids,
such as crosslinked polystyrene, are used and the voids
between the nanospheres are filled with inorganic material
precursors. These materials have recently attracted much
interest due to their potential application as optical
waveguides [240].
A different method of preparing ordered composites is
the use of artificial 3D periodic opal lattices with silica
spheres smaller than 300 nm. These systems were infiltrated
with monomers, which were crosslinked in the voids, or
preformed polymers. From this periodic composite structure, the silica opal was etched out and so-called inverse
polymer opals were formed. In this approach polymers such
as ferroelectric vinylidene fluoride trifluoroethylene copolymers [241], poly(3-alkylthiophene) [242], or bisphenol
A-epichlorohydrin copolymer epoxy resin were used [243].
Furthermore, monomers can also be polymerized in the
voids, for example ( p-xylenebis(tetrahydrothiophenium
chloride)), was polymerized in situ [244].
8. Applications
The possible applications of the described materials are
manifold and the future of these materials appears bright.
Especially, the tremendous possibilities of different combinations in nanocomposites between inorganic and organic
species, allow properties which cannot be obtained by
traditional composite materials. In this review only a limited
amount of applications can be exemplary introduced. The
examples follow the specific properties of the
nanocomposites.
Optical transparency. Although many of the features of
inorganic and organic polymeric moieties that are important
for optical issues such as the refractive index are very
different, the resulting material can often be prepared to be
optically transparent. This is based on the small length scale
over which phase separation may exist.
In order to implement optoelectronic or photonic
properties into devices, the materials have to fulfill high
optical quality demands and have to be stable over a long
period. Furthermore, the control of the refractive index as
well as the thickness and, therefore, the processibility of the
materials are important. Due to its low optical losses (high
optical quality), silica glass and composites made from it
seem to be very useful for these devices [245,246]. For
example, photoconducting composites were prepared by the
incorporation of cadmium sulfide particles in a polyvinylcarbazole matrix. The resulting materials allowed the tuning
of the band-gap of the sensitizing nanocrystals so that their
spectral response was adjusted to suit a particular wavelength of operation [247,248].
The already mentioned low optical loss of silica-based
composite materials, the ability to tune light scattering, and
depending on the composition of the low reflectivity, makes
such hybrid materials possible candidates as glues between
waveguide optical fiber interfaces. Therefore, they have
potential applications in optical interconnection devices
used in telecommunication networks. However, the problem
in such cases is the volume shrinkage. New composite
inorganic organic materials based on a silica and a
crosslinked polymer phase resulted in low volume shrinkage
during network formation [249].
Mechanical and thermal properties. The enhancement of
mechanical and thermal properties of polymers by the
inclusion of inorganic moieties, especially in the form of
nanocomposites, offers the possibility for these materials to
substitute classical compounds based on metals or on
traditional composites in the transportation industry. This is
especially interesting due to environmental issues and the
demand for lightweight materials resulting in a better fuel
economy [250].
Scratch-resistance or barrier property inorganic organic
coatings were developed by a polymer/sol gel approach
[37,251]. For example, UV curable systems were obtained
by the cocondensation of 3-(N-styrylmethyl-2-aminoethylamino)-propyltrimethoxysilane hydrochloride and varying
amounts of TMOS using 1-hydroxycyclohexylphenylketone
as photoinitiator (Fig. 4). Thermally curable compositions
consisted of TMOS, GLYMO, 3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane, aluminum-sec-butoxide, and zirconium-n-propoxide.
A study of these systems revealed that the oxygen
permeability decreased with increasing density of the
inorganic moiety as well as with the organic network,
which was varied through the ratios of the precursors [251].
Alteration of optical properties. Third order non-linear
optical (NLO) materials were obtained by composites based
on sol gel processed inorganic oxide/conjugated polymers.
Organic polymers with p-electron conjugation are an
important class of potentially useful NLO-materials due to
their large non-resonant third-order non-linearity with fast
response time. However, pure PPV films exhibit relatively
high optical losses, while silica has a low optical loss, its
non-linear susceptibility is very low. Therefore, a combination of both systems leads to new materials with superior
NLO properties [252].
Nanocomposite-based devices for electronic and optoelectronic applications include light-emitting diodes, photodiodes, solar cells, gas sensors and field effect transistors.
While most of these devices can also be produced as fully
organic polymer-based systems, the composites with
inorganic moieties have important advantages such as the
improvement of long-term stability, the improvement of
105
Fig. 4. Composition of (a) UV curable and (b) thermally curable inorganicorganic hybrids for application as oxygen barrier coatings.
106
Scheme 15.
9. Summary
The incorporation of nanoscale inorganic species in
organic polymers offers the possibility of the formation
of a plethora of novel materials with a high potential for
new application. For optimal control of the properties of
these new materials, it is highly important to tailor the
formation process from the point of view of the final
product. For example, the formation of highly optical
transparent material requires another process other than
that of a system with good thermal and mechanical
properties. At the present time, this very interdisciplinary scientific area is open for new ideas from all
disciplines and therefore a promising future can be
foreseen.
Acknowledgements
The author thanks Ulrich Schubert and Nicola Husing for
fruitful discussions, Susan Thompson for technical assistance, and the Fonds fur wissenschaftliche Forschung,
Vienna, for financial support of his work.
References
[1] Okada A, Usuki A. The chemistry of polymerclay hybrids.
Mater Sci Engng 1995;C3:10915.
[2] Gilman JW. Flammability and thermal stability studies of
polymer layered-silicate (clay) nanocomposites. Appl Clay
Sci 1999;15:3149.
[3] Gilman JW, Jackson CL, Morgan AB, Harris Jr. R, Manias E,
Giannelis EP, Wuthenow M, Hilton D, Phillips SH.
Flammability properties of polymer-layered silicate nanocomposites. Polypropylene and polystyrene nanocomposites.
Chem Mater 2000;12:186673.
[4] Porter D, Metcalfe E, Thomas MJK. Nanocomposite fire
retardantsa review. Fire Mater 2000;24:4552.
[5] Zanetti M, Lomakin S, Camino G. Polymer layered silicate
nanocomposites. Macromol Mater Engng 2000;279:19.
[6] Armes SP. Electrically conducting polymer colloids. Polym
News 1995;20:233 7.
[7] Godovski DY. Electron behavior and magnetic properties of
polymer nanocomposites. Adv Polym Sci 1995;119:79122.
[8] Pomogailo AD. Hybrid polymerinorganic nanocomposites.
Russ Chem Rev 2000;69:5380.
[9] Sperling LH. Interpenetrating polymer networks and related
materials. New York: Plenum Press; 1981.
[10] Judeinstein P, Sanchez C. Hybrid organic inorganic
materials: a land of multidisciplinarity. J Mater Chem
1996;6:51125.
[32]
[33]
[34]
[35]
[36]
[37]
[38]
[39]
[40]
[41]
[42]
[43]
[44]
[45]
[46]
[47]
[48]
107
108
[68]
[69]
[70]
[71]
[72]
[73]
[74]
[75]
[76]
[77]
[78]
[79]
[80]
[81]
[82]
[83]
[84]
[85]
[103]
[104]
[105]
[106]
[107]
[108]
[109]
[110]
[111]
[112]
[113]
[114]
[115]
[116]
[117]
[118]
[119]
[120]
109
110
[121]
[122]
[123]
[124]
[125]
[126]
[127]
[128]
[129]
[130]
[131]
[132]
[133]
[134]
[135]
[136]
[137]
[138]
[139] Krawiec W, Scanlon Jr. LG, Fellner JP, Vaia RA, Vasudevan
S, Giannelis EP. Polymer nanocomposites: a new strategy for
synthesizing solid electrolytes for rechargeable lithium
batteries. J Power Sources 1995;54:3105.
[140] Vaia RA, Ishii H, Giannelis EP. Synthesis and properties of
two-dimensional nanostructures by direct intercalation of
polymer melts in layered silicates. Chem Mater 1993;5:
16946.
[141] Stein A, Melde BJ, Schroden RC. Hybrid inorganic organic
meso-porous silicates-nanoscopic reactors coming of age.
Adv Mater 2000;12:140319.
[142] Schollhorn R. Intercalation systems as nanostructured
functional materials. Chem Mater 1996;8:174757.
[143] Frisch HL, Mark JE. Nanocomposites prepared by threding
polymer chains through zeolites, mesoporous silica, or silica
nanotubes. Chem Mater 1996;8:17358.
[144] Frisch HL, Xue Y. Hybrid inorganic/organic interpenetrating
polymer networks based on zeolite 13X and polystyrene.
J Polym Sci, Part A: Polym Chem 1995;33:1979 85.
[145] Frisch HL, Maaref S, Xue Y, Beaucage G, Pu Z, Mark JE.
Interpenetrating and pseudo-interpenetrating polymer networks of poly(ethyl acrylate) and zeolite 13X. J Polym Sci,
Part A: Polym Chem 1996;34:673 7.
[146] Krishnamoorti R, Vaia RA, Giannelis EP. Structure and
dynamics of polymer-layered silicate nanocomposites. Chem
Mater 1996;8:172834.
[147] Graeser A, Spange S. Novel polyvinyl ether-HY zeolite
hybrid materials: general features. Chem Mater 1998;10:
18149.
[148] Munichandraiah N, Scanlon LG, Marsh RA, Kumar B, Sircar
AK. Influence of zeolite on electrochemical and physicochemical properties of polyethylene oxide solid electrolyte.
J Appl Electrochem 1995;25:857 63.
[149] Pereira C, Kokotailo GT, Gorte RJ. Acetylene polymerization in a H-ZSM-5 zeolite. J Phys Chem 1991;95:7059.
[150] Schneider J, Fanter D, Bauer M, Schomburg C, Wohrle D,
Schulz-Ekloff G. Preparation and optical transparency of
composite materials from methacrylate ester copolymers and
faujasites with an embedded azo dye. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 2000;39:257 63.
[151] Spange S, Graeser A, Muller H, Zimmermann Y, Rehak P,
Jaeger C, Fuess H, Baehtz C. Synthesis of inorganic/organic
hostguest hybrid materials by cationic vinyl polymerization
within Y zeolites and MCM-41. Chem Mater 2001;13:
3698708.
[152] Pattantyus-Abraham AG, Wolf MO. Photoluminescence of
poly(P-phenylene vinylene) encapsulated in mesoporous
silica. Mater Res Soc Symp Proc 1999;560:291 5.
[153] Spange S, Graeser A, Rehak P, Jager C, Schulz M. Cationic
polymerization of cyclohexyl vinyl ether within MCM-41
channels. Macromol Rapid Commun 2000;21:14650.
[154] Moller K, Bein T, Fischer RX. Synthesis of ordered
mesoporous methacrylate hybrid systems: hosts for molecular polymer composites. Chem Mater 1999;11:66573.
[155] Enzel P, Bein T. Inclusion of polyaniline filaments in zeolite
molecular sieves. J Phys Chem 1989;93:62702.
[156] Wu CG, Bein T. Conducting polyaniline filaments in a
mesoporous channel host. Science 1994;264:17579.
[157] Wu C, Bein T. Polyaniline wires in oxidant-containing
mesoporous channel hosts. Chem Mater 1994;6:110912.
[178]
[179]
[180]
[181]
[182]
[183]
[184]
[185]
[186]
[187]
[188]
[189]
[190]
[191]
[192]
[193]
[194]
111
112
[195]
[196]
[197]
[198]
[199]
[200]
[201]
[202]
[203]
[204]
[205]
[206]
[207]
[208]
[209]
[210]
[211]
[212]
[213]
[214]
[215]
[216]
[217]
[218]
[219]
[220]
[221]
[222]
[223]
[224]
[225]
[226]
[227]
[228]
[229]
deformation of polyurethane containing polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxanes (POSS) molecules. Polymer 2000;42:
599611.
Mather PT, Jeon HG, Romo-Uribe A, Haddad TS, Lichtenhan JD. Mechanical relaxation and microstructure of
poly(norbornyl-POSS) copolymers. Macromolecules 1999;
32:1194203.
Pyun J, Matyjaszewski K. Synthesis of hybrid polymers
using atom transfer radical polymerization: homopolymers
and block copolymers from polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane monomers. Macromolecules 2000;33:217 20.
Pyun J, Matyjaszewski K. Synthesis of nanocomposite
organic/inorganic hybrid materials using controlled/living
radical polymerization. Chem Mater 2001;13:3436 48.
Tsuchida A, Bolln C, Sernetz FG, Frey H, Mulhaupt R.
Ethene and propene copolymers containing silsesquioxane
side groups. Macromolecules 1997;30:2818 24.
Laible R, Hamann K. Polyreaktionen an Pigmentoberflachen.
Angew Makromol Chem 1975;48:97133.
Huang X, Wirth MJ. Surface-initiated radical polymerisation
on porous silica. Anal Chem 1997;69:4477580.
Prucker O, Ruhe J. Mechanism of radical chain polymerizations initiated by azo compounds covalently bound to the
surface of spherical particles. Macromolecules 1998;31:
602 13.
von Werne T, Patten TE. Preparation of structurally welldefined polymer nanoparticle hybrids with controlled/living
radical polymerization. J Am Chem Soc 1999;121:740910.
Boven G, Oosterling MLCM, Chella G, Schouten AJ.
Grafting kinetics of poly(methyl methacrylate) on microparticulate silica. Polymer 1990;31:2377 83.
Tsubokawa N, Ishida H. Graft polymerization of methyl
methacrylate from silica initiated by peroxide groups
introduced onto the surface. J Polym Sci, Part A: Polym
Chem 1992;30:22416.
Schulz GV, Harborth G. The mechanism of the explosive
polymerization of methyl methacrylate. Makromol Chem
1948;1:10639.
Bottcher H, Hallensleben ML, Nu S, Wurm H. ATRP
grafting from silica surface to create first and second
generation of grafts. Polym Bull 2000;44:2239.
Nu S, Bottcher H, Wurm H, Hallensleben ML. Gold
nanoparticles with covalently attached polymer chains.
Angew Chem, Int Ed 2001;40:4016 8.
Kresge CT, Leonowicz ME, Roth WJ, Vartuli JC, Beck
JS. Ordered mesoporous molecular sieves synthesized by
liquid crystals templating mechanisms. Nature 1992;359:
710 2.
Kramer E, Forster S, Goltner CG, Antonietti M. Synthesis of
nanoporous silica with new pore morphologies by templating
the assemblies of ionic block copolymers. Langmuir 1998;
14:202731.
Simon PFW, Ulrich R, Spiess HW, Wiesner U. Block
copolymer ceramic hybrid materials from organically
modified ceramic precursors. Chem Mater 2001;13:
346486.
Goltner CG, Berton B, Kramer EM, Antonietti M. Nanoporous silicas by casting the aggregates of amphiphilic block
copolymers. The transition from cylinders to lamellae and
vesicles. Adv Mater 1999;11:3958.
Goltner CG, Berton B, Kramer E, Antonietti M. Nanoporous
[230]
[231]
[232]
[233]
[234]
[235]
[236]
[237]
[238]
[239]
[240]
[241]
[242]
[243]
[244]
113
114