Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Introduction:
A universal attribute of any society, tribe, or nation is its capacity and obvious willingness to
wage wars. Whether or not to vanquish, to colonize, to protect, to develop, or to with ease set up
a symbolic superiority, a nations use of military actions performs an primary function within the
definition of that nations identification. Whatever the marketed purpose of a war, nonetheless, it
is finally a social occasion that regularly allows for the dying and suffering of each warring
parties and civilians and for the exploitation of thousands of men and women, children and adults
on a grand scale. The chaos and turmoil of wartime seems to carry out the worst qualities in
human beings.
In an article published in the University of St. Thomas Law Journal1 it highlights that a major
tenet of the laws of war is that civilians, and women and children in particular, are to be
protected from the trials and suffering of war to the fullest extent possible.
Therefore, it is ultimately the task of each military and its members to make sure their behaviors
are consistent with the specifications in International Humanitarian Law (IHL). Even though the
complete avoidance of civilian deaths and suffering is not realistic, it is the responsibility of an
armed force to not intentionally target civilians and to consider operations in terms of the
concepts of distinction, military necessity and proportionality. By their very nature and status,
civilians are vulnerable to the atrocities of war, but that vulnerability should never be taken
advantage of by offering as an excuse the argument that in times of conflict, no one is safe and
suffering must be expected. Suffering and death in war are certainly anticipated; unnecessary
violence and the targeted abuse of vulnerable populations with the purposes of exhibiting control
or claiming entitlements are war crimes.
1 Kirby, Kristi M., and Claude DEstree. 2008. "Peacekeepers, the Military and Human Trafficking:
Protecting Whom?" University of St.Thomas Law Journal 6.
Before 2000, there was no internationally accepted definition of trafficking, despite the fact that
it used to be usually famous as a major violation of human rights. The lack of an Internationally
agreed upon definition impeded assistance to victims as a result of a lack of consensus on what
constituted trafficking. Just lately nevertheless, states have begun to link trafficking to key
transnational issues together with migrant smuggling and geared up crime.
Trafficking in
persons encompasses longstanding typical practices as well the growing transnational crime
similar to contemporary day slavery. It's difficult to improve a single definition that addresses
the global and targeted regional and nearby practices that may be characterised as trafficking.
An worldwide definition can more readily tackle the global nature of trafficking, while each
State will have to increase counter-trafficking legal guidelines to address nearby and regional
trends and patterns of trafficking.
Human trafficking is a procedure of people being recruited in their group and country of origin
and transported to the destination the place they are being exploited for purposes of pressured
labor, prostitution, domestic servitude, and different forms of exploitation. The internationally
recognized definition of trafficking is set forth in the Protocol to avert, Suppress and Punish.
4 UNIFEM (2002): Women, War and Peace: The Independent Experts Assessment on the Impact of Armed
Conflict on Women and Womens Role in Peace-building, by Elisabeth Rehn/Ellen Johnson Sirleaf; International
Alert (2002): Gender Mainstreaming in Peace Support Operations: Moving Beyond Rhetoric to Practice, London,
pp. 19-22.
5 Protocol to Prevent, Suppress and Punish Trafficking in Persons, Especially Women and Children, General
Assembly resolution 55/25, annex II, p.32. http://www.unodc.org/pdf/crime/a_res_55/res5525e.pdf. Since December
25, 2003 when the Protocol entered into force, 117 countries have signed and 132 countries have ratified the
Protocol as of September 10, 2009.
6 The United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime, General Assembly resolution
55/25.http://www.unodc.org/pdf/crime/a_res_55/res5525e.pdf
8 For a detailed discussion on trafficker profiles, see ILO and UNICEF (2009).
9 The United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (2002). Recommended Principles and Guidelines on
Human Rights and Human Trafficking, E/2002/68/Add.1.
10 http://www.iom.int/jahia/Jahia/about-migration/managing-migration/cache/offonce/pid/676
12 http://www.acf.hhs.gov/trafficking/about/fact_sex.pdf
13 See Clert, Carine, Elizabeth Gomart with Ivana Aleksic and Natalia Otel (2005).
14 Human Rights Watch (2003): Climate of Fear.
15 Over 400 Iraqi women kidnapped, raped in post--war chaos, Jordan Times, August 25, The Arab Regional
Resource Center on Violence against Women.
16 Mlodoch, Karin: Lange Schatten der Vergangenheit, ai--journal, amnesty international, Heft 10, October 2003,
pp. 12--13.
10
11
National Actors
Governments: Efforts undertaken by the government to combat human trafficking vary in
each country. Some governments acknowledge the problem of human trafficking by
12
13
Suggestions:
14
prosecution of trafficking and enslavement for the period of wars wants to be increased after the
wars. This is also an most important contribution to sufferer rehabilitation and to creating the
crimes and their influence on women and societies obvious.
A scientific evaluation of the efforts and experiences with combating trafficking through
international and national institutions in submit-clash international locations or areas would for
that reason be priceless. This could be completed through bringing specialists and practitioners
together, drawing from the more than a few trafficking associated policy areas,reminiscent of
womens human rights defense, victim assistance, crime prevention, legal justice,health, poverty
discount. Headquartered on the outcome, policy guidelines for integrating anti-trafficking
measures in publish-clash reconstruction programmes and a framework for the monitoring of
these measures could be drawn up.
Conclusion:
Trafficking of women in the course of and after wars is founded on identical explanations and
conditions that characterize trafficking more often than not. Nevertheless, armed conflicts motive
an amplification of those motives and conditions. Additionally they result in precise forms of
struggle-associated trafficking.
discrimination and violence that are exacerbated in the course of and after wars, frequently as a
part of deliberate military policies. Clash and publish-clash circumstances may just increase
exact war associated demand structures for womens sexual, economic and navy exploitation.
Therefore, trafficking in women may emerge as an main element for struggle economies and for
the fiscal profit of battle actors. Sexual and labour exploitation and abuse could also be a part of
military politics. Impunity of gender associated struggle crimes throughout and after wars
because of the struggle chaos and to the low prioritization of womens human rights defense are
16
17
Bibliography
Human Rights Watch (2002): The War within theWar, Sexual Violence Against Women
And Girls in Eastern Congo, New York, Washington, London, Brussels: Human Rights
Watch, 2002.
Yoshiaki, Yoshimi (2000):Comfort Women: Sexual Slavery in the Japanese Military
During World War II, New York: Columbia University Press.
Mazurana, Dyan (2002): International peacekeeping operations: to neglect gender is to
risk peacekeeping failure, in: Cockburn/ Zarkov (eds.), pp. 41-50.
Rees, Madeleine (2002): International Intervention in Bosnia Herzegovina: the cost of
ignoring gender, in: Cockburn/ Zarkov (eds.), pp. 51-67.
Amnesty International (2003): Afghanistan: No-one listens to us and no-one treats us as
human beings. Justice denied to women.
At: www.web.amnesty.org/library/print/ENGASA110232003;
Coomaraswamy, Radhika, Special Rapporteur on Violence Against Women (2002):
Report on the Integration of the Human Rights of Women and the Gender Perspective,
Violence Against Women, Mission to Sierra Leone (21-29 August 2001), UN
Commission on Human Rights, E/CN.4/2002/83/Add.2.
Human Rights Watch (2003): Bhutan/Nepal: Trapped by Inequality: Bhutanese Refugee
Women in Nepal. New York: September 2003.
Human Rights Watch (2003): Climate of Fear: Sexual Violence and Abduction of Women
and Girls in Baghdad. Iraq. Vol. 15, no.7 (E), July 2003.
Human Rights Watch (2003): Killing You is a Very Easy Thing For Us: Human Rights
Abuses in Southeast Afghanistan, Vol. 15, No. 05 (C), July 2003
Human Rights Watch (2003):Well kill you if you cry Sexual Violence in
18
19