Professional Documents
Culture Documents
BUSINESS MONTHLY
Coding | Billing | Auditing | Compliance | Practice Management
April 2016
www.aapc.com
Anaheim
September 19-21, 2016
Disneyland Hotel
Atlantic City
October 6-8, 2016
Harrahs Atlantic City
COVER | Coding/Billing | 35
[contents]
Coding/Billing
Auditing/Compliance
Practice Management
www.aapc.com
April 2016
18
Michelle A. Dick
Coders Voice
20 CMS EHR Toolkit Gives a Glimpse into Potential Compliance Issues
Coding/Billing
18 Examine Integumentary and Musculoskeletal Coding Changes
42
Judy A. Wilson, CPC, CPCO, CPPM, CPB, CPC-P, COC, CPC-I, CANPC
Auditing/Compliance
42 The Latest on HIPAA: The Gun Check Rule
54
Sue Miller
Practice Management
52 The Doctor Said What?
COMING UP:
DEPARTMENTS
14 Ethics Committee
Chat Room
I Am AAPC
EDUCATION
60 Newly Credentialed Members
www.aapc.com/resources/publications/
healthcare-business-monthly/archive.aspx
Looking
to get
certified?
CPC
COC
CIC
CRC
CPB
CPMA
CPPM
CPCO
www.aapc.com/exam-prep
Go Green!
Why should you sign up to receive Healthcare Business Monthly in
digital format?
Here are some great reasons:
You will save a few trees.
You wont have to wait for issues to come in the mail.
You can read Healthcare Business Monthly on your computer, tablet, or
other mobile deviceanywhere, anytime.
You will always know where your issues are.
Digital issues take up a lot less room in your home or office than paper
issues.
vendor index
HEALTHCARE
BUSINESS MONTHLY
Coding | Billing | Auditing | Compliance | Practice Management
April 2016
Director of Publishing
Brad Ericson, MPC, CPC, COSC
brad.ericson@aapc.com
Managing Editor
John Verhovshek, MA, CPC
g.john.verhovshek@aapc.com
Editorial
Michelle A. Dick, BS
Renee Dustman, BS
Graphic Design
Mahfooz Alam
Kamal Sarkar
Advertising
Jon Valderama
jon.valderama@aapc.com
Address all inquires, contributions, and change of address notices to:
Together, we are
raising the business
of healthcare to
new levels.
Jason J. VandenAkker
CEO
www.aapc.com
April 2016
BUSINESS MONTHLY
March 2016
www.aapc.com
Michael S. Mix Up
March2016_HBM.indd 1
11/02/16 9:33 pm
Chat Room
CHAT ROOM
I was psyched and decided to sit for the Certified Professional Coder (CPC) exam. Although I had been out of school for a year,
I was already working with codes and felt
fairly confident and ready. Unfortunately, I
failed by an earth-shattering 1 percent. The
road seemed so long, my career advancement was once again stalled, and I began
to question whether this was truly the career for me.
Hurdle One
One month before graduation, the government postponed the ICD-10 implementation; however, my school had already started
teaching ICD-10 because ICD-9 was slated
to be obsolete by graduation. This meant I
didnt know ICD-9 well enough to sit for a
certification exam.
Hurdle Two
My school was AHIMA accredited and
encouraged us to take the Certified Coding Specialist (CCS) test; however, the test
was suspended indefinitely within weeks
of graduation. All of my exam preparation
was in vain.
Hurdle Three
I had to self-teach myself ICD-9 because I
#IamAAPC
I Am AAPC
My husband believed I could pass and encouraged me to study. For four weeks, I
studied day and night. I applied my studies
to the coding I was doing at work. My husband and my father bought all the study materials AAPC had available. One month later, I passed the exam!
#IamAAPC
#IamAAPC
www.aapc.com
April 2016
Region 7 Mountain/Plains
Region 7 - Mountain/Plains
Regional Spotlight
chapter, she has held multiple officer positions over the past 10
years, including vice president (twice), president (twice), member
development officer, and education officer. She assists others with
charitable acts and helps members to find jobs. Her professional
ethics have influenced current officers with great success.
800-626-2633
aapc.com/webinars
www.aapc.com
April 2016
11
Experiencing
Hard Times
T H ER ES H EL P
Project AAPC
Established in 2010, Project AAPC further developed former AAPC Chapter Association Chair Jill Youngs, CPC, CEDC,
CIMC, vision for chapter members to help
one another by donating to the American
Red Cross or Feeding America after a devastating event. Project AAPC donated more
than $10,000 to those organizations during the Nashville floods of 2010, all of which
was collected by AAPC members and AAPC
staff. After finding out that some of our
members were unable to get the help they
needed from those organizations, the AAPC
Chapter Association board decided to donate
all Project AAPC money directly to chapter members in need. Project AAPC assists
chapter members with money for food, lodging, and basic necessities when there is a proven need.
Since its inception, Project AAPC has helped
many chapter members subjected to a devastating event. For example:
Members recently affected by the
South Carolina flood;
A member with a severe illness
preventing her from working; and
12
How to Apply
The application for the Hardship Scholarship Fund can be found on AAPCs official
website at www.aapc.com/memberarea/chapters/
scholarship-application.aspx. Remember to be
Pay It Forward
The Scholarship Application Review
Committee is made up of past AAPC
Chapter Association board members serving
in an anonymous and voluntary role. This
ensures the process is fair to all. The funds
are supported through donations made by
members and local chapters. If funds run
too low, the ability to grant scholarships will
be put on hold until more funds become
available. Talk to your chapter about
budgeting for a gift to these funds, so we can
keep helping our members who are in need.
You can also make a personal donation.
Personal donations should be in the form
of a check, payable to the AAPCCA Hardship Scholarship Fund or Project AAPC, and
mailed to:
AAPCCA-Project AAPC/
AAPCCA-Hardship Scholarship Fund
2233 S. Presidents Drive
Salt Lake City, UT 84120
Judy A. Wilson, CPC, COC, CPCO, CPPM, CPC-P,
CPB, CPC-I, CANPC, has been a medical coder/biller for
more than 35 years. For the past 25 years she has been
the business administrator for Anesthesia Specialists, a
group of nine cardiac anesthesiologists who practice at
Sentara Heart Hospital. Wilson served on the AAPC Chapter Association
board of director from 2010- 2014, and is serving from 2015-2017. She is
also on the board of directors of Bryant & Stratton College in Virginia
Beach, Va. Wilson is a PMCC instructor and teaches classes in the Tidewater area. She serves on the National Advisory Board for American Academy
of Billers for AMBA, has presented at several AAPC regional and national
conferences, and is a member of the Chesapeake, Va., local chapter.
April 2016
13
AAPC
Ethics Committee
By Michael D. Miscoe, JD, CPC,
CASCC, CUC, CCPC, CPCO, CPMA
A Question of
cern with your employer. The impact of those mistakes will fall
where they belong, on the practice. The practice will be forced to refund overpayments or may suffer payment delays or denials because
of those mistakes. Although the practice may seek to place the blame
on you for the errors, the evidence of your previously-raised concerns
would undermine such allegations. Relative to your work as a coder,
the Code of Ethics would come into play only if you purposefully or
negligently misrepresented services for the purpose of receiving some
personal benefit. That doesnt seem to be the issue here.
Productivity improvement and efficiency are not improper goals
for any organization; they are key to profitability. There is a balance, however, that must be found. At some point, pure productivity
based on how many claims you must code becomes counterproductive when you have insufficient time to ensure codes reported are justified or accurate.
As to your question relative to the motive behind the Code of Ethics, its in no way a form of pandering. AAPC members can be found
working on behalf of providers, payers, and the government. Our ethical standards exist because we cannot call ourselves a professional organization without them. All professions impose and enforce ethical
standards on their members. Our commitment to ethical conduct,
as well as educational standards as measured through testing, is what
separates us from others who have not had to demonstrate their competence in the areas of coding, billing, auditing, practice management, or compliance. For that reason, AAPC credentialed members
have more value in the marketplace. Ultimately, you are the only person who can determine how you will act or react in a given circumstance. The Code of Ethics is a guide to help ensure you act or react
in a professional manner.
Michael D. Miscoe, JD, CPC, CASCC, CUC, CCPC, CPCO, CPMA, is president-elect of
AAPCs National Advisory Board, serves on AAPCs Legal Advisory Board, and is AAPC Ethics
Committee chair. He is admitted to the practice of law in California as well as to the bar of the
U.S. Supreme Court and the U.S. district courts in the southern district of California and the
western district of Pennsylvania. Miscoe has over 20 years of experience in healthcare coding
and over 18 years as a forensic coding and compliance expert. He has provided expert analysis
and testimony on coding and compliance issues in civil and criminal cases and represents healthcare providers in
post-payment audits and HIPAA OCR matters. Miscoe speaks on a national level, and is published nationally on a
variety of coding, compliance, and health law topics. He is a member and past president of the Johnstown, Pa.,
local chapter.
istock.com/travellinglight
CPT Modifiers
ICD-9 Crosswalks
CCI Edits Checker
Medicare LCD lookup
CMS Transmittals
Specialty Newsletters
EARN UP TO
20 CEUs
WITH YOUR ANNUAL
SUBSCRIPTION
Vanessa M.
ADDED EDGE
By Michelle A. Dick
Its
as
easy
as
Its
as
easy
as
Its
as easy
as
1 Register
at aapc.com/passport
1
1
2
2
2
3
3
3
Register at aapc.com/passport
Register at aapc.com/passport
Download the Passport mobile app
Download the Passport mobile app
Download the Passport mobile app
Login and save!
Login and save!
Login and save!
CODING/BILLING
By John Verhovshek, MA, CPC
ithin the Surgery section of CPT, the new year brings just two
new Integumentary codes, and deletes a single Musculoskeletal code. Minor changes such as these are easy to overlook, but costly to ignore.
Integumentary Updates
Fiducial markers serve as radiologic landmarks. Using imaging guidance, each marker is placed in or near a tumor and becomes the target to facilitate precise delivery of radiation treatments. CPT adds
two codes to describe placement of these devices:
10035
+10036
Placement of soft tissue localization device(s) (eg, clip, metallic pellet, wire/needle, radioactive
seeds), percutaneous, including imaging guidance; first lesion
each additional lesion (List separately in addition to code for primary procedure)
Report 10035 and 10036 per lesion, not per marker (several markers
may be placed per lesion). Claim 10035 for placement of soft tissue
markers at an initial lesion and +10036 for each additional lesion targeted beyond the first.
The American Medical Associations (AMA) CPT Changes 2016: An
Insiders View provides an example of proper application for 10035:
A 62-year-old female presents with previously biopsied left
axillary lymph node metastases secondary to invasive ductal
breast carcinoma. She is now referred for neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Marking of the positive lymph node is requested
prior to the initiation of neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
istock.com/kot63
18
Coding/Billing
Auditing/Compliance
Practice Management
To discuss this
article or topic, go to
www.aapc.com
CODING/BILLING
istock.com//elnur
Integumentary/Musculoskeletal
76942
Ultrasonic guidance for needle placement (eg, biopsy, aspiration, injection, localization device), imaging supervision and interpretation
77002
Fluoroscopic guidance for needle placement (eg, biopsy, aspiration, injection, localization device)
77012
Computed tomography guidance for needle placement (eg, biopsy, aspiration, injection, localization
device), radiological supervision and interpretation
77021
Magnetic resonance guidance for needle placement (eg, for biopsy, needle aspiration, injection, or placement of localization device) radiological supervision and interpretation
There are no guideline or parenthetical instruction revisions in the Integumentary chapter for 2016.
www.aapc.com
April 2016
19
CODING/BILLING
By Sheri Poe Bernard, CPC, COC, CPC-I, CCS-P
Coders Voice
istock.com/pandpstock
20
Without any fanfare, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) last year published its Electronic Health Records Toolkit,
offering coders, facilities, and providers a glimpse of the regulatory
risks that CMS assigns to improper EHR use. Anyone with an EHR
who hasnt reviewed the CMS documents should access the Toolkit
and distribute all or parts of it to providers, coders, and legal counsel, as appropriate.
Although the Toolkit falls short of answering many questions regarding documentation and coding compliance, it gives a glimpse into
what CMS considers the important regulatory issues associated with
electronic records, and provides some rudimentary guidance.
Coding/Billing
Auditing/Compliance
Practice Management
CMS Toolkit
CODING/BILLING
April 2016
21
CMS Toolkit
CODING/BILLING
Although stating that populating by default may result in the reporting of services that were not delivered, the Toolkit falls short
of outlawing population by default; instead, saying the provider should verify the validity of auto-populated information. It offers no best practices solution for populating by default, although a
simple best practice might be to turn off this function in the EHR.
CMS Toolkit
EHRs include current codes from the major code sets, and
providers can use these lists to code encounters and either
submit these codes directly or have them reviewed by
coding/billing staff before submission. But nearly all systems
lack code instructions, guidelines, and information from
Coding Clinic or CPT Assistant. Most providers are not certified coders and do not have the breadth of understanding
to select codes compliantly. Truncated code descriptions in
some EHRs also contribute to coding errors.
CODING/BILLING
April 2016
23
CMS Toolkit
To discuss this
article or topic, go to
www.aapc.com
Macros include the templated questions, plus pre-loaded generic negative history responses and normal exam findings As automatic or single-click tools, the macro loads a completed clinical document before the patient has even been evaluated, Levinson said.
Levinson also emphasizes that coders and auditors require comprehensive and compliant tools that consider medical necessity when reviewing EHR documentation and coding. The commonly-employed, non-compliant scoring sheet not only offers inadequate and incorrect E/M coding in paper records, but it completely lacks tools to address the aforementioned five deficiencies
of EHRs. Practical E/Ms compliant audit forms for paper charts
were published as part of a CD accompanying the second edition of
Practical E/M in 2008. These forms were subsequently enhanced
to consider all the above EHR danger areas; PDFs of these coding
and audit charts were made available through AAPC in conjunction with Levinsons 2013 AAPC Workshop, Advanced E/M Coding for EHRs (www.aapc.com/workshops/em-coding-ehr.aspx).
Sheri Poe Bernard, CPC, COC, CPC-I, CCS-P, is a coding education and risk adjustment
consultant and author of the AMA publication, Netters Atlas of Surgical Anatomy for CPT
Coding. Her 20-year career in coding and reimbursement includes developing coding curriculum and references for AAPC, the AMA, DecisionHealth, Elsevier, Optum360, and Staywell.
Bernard is a member of the Salt Lake City, Utah, local chapter.
Resources
CMS, Electronic Health Records Toolkit, Program Integrity: Electronic Health Records
files: www.cms.gov/Medicare-Medicaid-Coordination/Fraud-Prevention/MedicaidIntegrity-Education/electronic-health-records.html
CMS, Ensuring Proper Use of Electronic Health Record Features and Capabilities: A
Decision Table, Table 1: www.cms.gov/Medicare-Medicaid-Coordination/FraudPrevention/Medicaid-Integrity-Education/Downloads/ehr-decision-table.pdf
CMS, Medicare Learning Network, Evaluation and Management Services Guide: www.
cms.gov/Outreach-and-Education/Medicare-Learning-Network-MLN/MLNProducts/
downloads/eval_mgmt_serv_guide-ICN006764.pdf
24
istock.com/MKurtbas
CODING/BILLING
CODING/BILLING
By Judy A. Wilson, CPC, CPCO, CPPM, CPB, CPC-P, COC, CPC-I, CANPC
Conquer Common
BILLING ERRORS
Verify Insurance
The number one reason, by far, for denied claims is failure to verify
insurance. Some of the common denials associated with not verifying insurance information are:
1. Subscriber is not eligible on the date of service.
2. S ervices are not covered or maximum benefits have been met.
3. S ervices were not authorized or authorization is required.
When you see these denials, I am sure you ask, Why didnt someone take care of this before we filed the claim? With people changing jobs and moving more often, insurance information can change
at any time. For this reason alone, your office should verify a patients
insurance eligibility at every visit.
26
Auditing/Compliance
Practice Management
istock.com/dina2001
Billing Errors
not paid within a timely matter, never just rebill the claim. Take
the time to contact the insurance carrier to check on the status of the
claim. Most carriers allow you to check claim status online, but the
alternative is to call them.
All systems now should have a way to check how long a claim has
been outstanding. Your office insurance representative should follow up on all claims aged over 30 days.
To reiterate: Never simply re-bill a claim that has not been paid. Rebilling can lead to another denial for duplicate billing, or worse duplicate payment, which may subject your practice to fraud.
To avoid these common errors, take time to verify and input patient
information correctly, and check your procedure and diagnosis coding prior to billing. These basic steps will keep your revenue flowing.
Plus, its always easier to do it right the first time.
Judy A. Wilson, CPC, COC, CPCO, CPPM, CPC-P, CPB, CPC-I, CANPC, has been a medical
coder/biller for more than 35 years. For the past 25 years, she has been the business administrator for Anesthesia Specialists, a group of nine cardiac anesthesiologists who practice at
Sentara Heart Hospital. Wilson has served on the AAPC Chapter Association board of directors
since 2010. She is also on the board of directors of Bryant & Stratton College in Virginia Beach,
Va. Wilson is a PMCC instructor and teaches classes in the Tidewater area. She serves on the National Advisory
Board for American Academy of Billers for AMBA, has presented at several AAPC regional and national conferences, and is a member of the Chesapeake, Va., local chapter.
www.aapc.com
April 2016
27
CODING/BILLING
CODING/BILLING
By David Zielske, MD, CIRCC, CCVTC, COC, CCC, CCS, RCC
CPT 2016:
or 2016, the biggest CPT coding changes affecting interventional radiology occur within the subspecialties of urinary, biliary, and
neurologic intervention. In March, we covered urinary intervention.
This month, well discuss the major changes in percutaneous biliary
interventional coding. Next month, well cover CPT updates for
percutaneous neurologic intervention.
Anatomically Speaking
There are 14 new biliary intervention codes for 2016 (see New Biliary Intervention Codes for 2016 on page 29). These codes include
both the surgical and supervision and interpretation (S&I) components of the procedure. As well, all of the new codes bundle the use of
imaging guidance, including fluoroscopy, ultrasound, computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
CPT guidelines instruct us to code separately for
each catheter placement, replacement, conversion,
Biliary obstruction at the
or removal. Catheter procedure codes are based on
distal common bile duct
each individual catheter via a separate access site.
Heres a rundown of how to apply the new codes.
The biliary system is divided into right- and left-sided bile ducts; however, these ducts divide further into multiple smaller branches that
may be individually accessed and drained, depending on the pathology treated (e.g., Klatskin tumor is a cholangiocarcinoma that has involved and caused bifurcation occlusions of the common bile duct. As
Cholangiography
28
Auditing/Compliance
Practice Management
Urinary
New Biliary Intervention Codes for 2016
Diagnostic cholangiography
CODING/BILLING
47531
Injection procedure for cholangiography, percutaneous, complete diagnostic procedure including imaging guidance (eg, ultrasound and/or fluoroscopy) and all associated radiological supervision and interpretation; existing access
47532 new access (eg, percutaneous transhepatic cholangiogram)
47537
Removal of biliary drainage catheter, percutaneous, requiring fluoroscopic guidance (eg, with concurrent indwelling biliary stents), including diagnostic cholangiography when performed, imaging guidance (eg, fluoroscopy), and all associated radiological supervision and interpretation
Placement of stent(s) into a bile duct, percutaneous, including diagnostic cholangiography, imaging guidance (eg, fluoroscopy and/or ultrasound), balloon dilation, catheter exchange(s) and catheter removal(s) when performed, and all associated radiological supervision and interpretation, each
stent; existing access
Placement of access through the biliary tree and into small bowel to assist with an endoscopic biliary
procedure (eg, rendezvous procedure), percutaneous, including diagnostic cholangiography when
performed, imaging guidance (eg, ultrasound and/or fluoroscopy), and all associated radiological supervision and interpretation, new access
April 2016
29
CODING/BILLING
Urinary
30
To discuss this
article or topic, go to
www.aapc.com
Urinary
CODING/BILLING
www.aapc.com
April 2016
31
CODING/BILLING
By Leonta (Lee) Williams, RHIT, CPC, CPCO, CCS, CCDS
mechanical ventilator is a device used to perform artificial respiration on a patient whose natural ability to breathe is compromised. Mechanical ventilation may be ordered for various reasons,
but it is generally used to get air into lungs, expel carbon dioxide from
lungs, or breathe for someone who cant do it on their own. Mechanical ventilation may also be used to help someone short of breath due
to a chronic lung disease. Invasive mechanical ventilation usually accomplished by endotracheal (ET) intubation or an artificial airway, such as a tracheostomy may be reasonable and necessary when
there are clinical indicators or lab values confirming the patient cannot maintain adequate ventilation.
Documentation Must
Support DRG Assignment
The 2016 Office of Inspector General (OIG) Work Plan includes review of Medicare payments for inpatient claims where the use of a
ventilator was billed. There is a difference in Medicare Severity-Diagnosis Related Group (MS-DRG) assignment and payment based
on the procedure code billed. An OIG audit for 2009-2011, with a
length of stay of four days or less, discovered an error rate of greater
than 95 percent in mechanical ventilation billing to Medicare. A total of 377 claims were reviewed and 363 of those claims showed an
overpayment.
To prevent overpayments, hospitals should have an internal audit system to monitor this service and validate the MS-DRG assignment. In
performing an internal audit, look for supporting documentation in
the medical record such as physician orders, nursing notes, respiratory therapy notes, operative notes, and provider progress notes.
In ICD-9-CM, the procedural codes identifying continuous invasive mechanical ventilation are 96.70 Continuous Invasive Mechanical Ventilation of Unspecified Duration; 96.71 Continuous Invasive
Mechanical Ventilation for Less than 96 Consecutive Hours; and 96.72
Continuous Invasive Mechanical Ventilation For 96 Consecutive Hours
Or More.
ICD-10-PCS requires you to be more specific:
5A1935Z Respiratory Ventilation, Less than 24 Consecutive Hours
5A1945Z Respiratory Ventilation, 24-96 Consecutive Hours
5A1955Z Respiratory Ventilation, Greater than 96 Consecutive Hours
Coding/Billing
Auditing/Compliance
Practice Management
istock.com/PaulVinten
To discuss this
article or topic, go to
www.aapc.com
MS-DRG
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) revised the
language for several MS-DRGs related to respiratory ventilation to
reflect the title change of Greater than 96 Consecutive Hours. For
example:
MS-DRG 870
MS-DRG 871
Septicemia or Severe Sepsis without Mechanical Ventilation 96+ Hours with MCC
MS-DRG 872
Septicemia or Severe Sepsis without Mechanical Ventilation 96+ Hours without MCC
CODING/BILLING
Lee Williams, RHIT, CPC, CPCO, CCS, CCDS, has over 13 years of health information management experience as a coding director, educator, trainer, and practice manager. She is the founder and past president of the Covington, Ga., local chapter and serves on AAPCs National Advisory Board, representing Region 4.
www.aapc.com
April 2016
33
?
FIRST BOOK SHIPS FREE
CODING/BILLING
By Mary Pat Whaley, FACMPE, CPC
Balance Billing:
Is It Legal?
Stay in line with private carrier
rules and follow updated
Medicare and Medicaid guidance.
alance billing is charging the patient for any balance on their account
after insurance has paid its portion. The question on everyones mind
is: Does the patient truly owe the balance after insurance pays?
The simple answer is, if there is a contract between the insurance plan and
the physician practice, the practice may collect up front from the patient:
Co-pays
Co-insurance
Deductibles
Any amount due for services the plan does not cover
If there is no contract between the insurance plan and the physician practice, the practice is not limited in what they may bill the patient.
Of course, it isnt really that simple. Knowing when you can or cant balance bill takes a bit more explanation.
Coding/Billing
Auditing/Compliance
Practice Management
www.aapc.com
April 2016
35
CODING/BILLING
Balance Billing
and informs the patient that they have no balance. That information may be confirmed by the insurance plan when the patient
calls, simply because the company is referencing its own information. Some reasons why an insurer might process the services incorrectly are:
There is a glitch in their system.
They will not pay until the patient provides information to
determine coordination of benefits.
The patients enrollment or COBRA information has not
caught up in the system.
They have incorrect information about the physicians
participation in the network.
To discuss this
article or topic, go to
www.aapc.com
Balance Billing
during the year, after which they may apply for QMB to cover the
cost of the Medicare Part A premium.
If a patient is eligible for the QMB program, purchasing additional Medigap coverage for Medicare premiums, deductibles, and/or
co-payments may be unnecessary. Review the benefits covered by
the Medigap policy to see if the plan covers services other than the
Medicare cost-sharing that may be useful to the patient.
CODING/BILLING
Resources
Shots Health News, NPR, States Make Laws to Protect Patients from Hidden Medical Bills,
Michelle Andrews, July 15, 2015: www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2015/07/15/422964973/
states-make-laws-to-protect-patients-from-hidden-medical-bills
MLN Matters SE1128 Revised, February 1, 2016: www.cms.gov/Outreach-and-Education/
Medicare-Learning-Network-MLN/MLNMattersArticles/downloads/se1128.pdf
www.aapc.com
April 2016
37
CODING/BILLING
By Heather Greene, MBA, RHIA, CPC, CPMA
The new system applies to Medicare patients, and the Centers for
Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) decided to use the current
PPS for consistency; however, instead of using a diagnosis related
group (DRG) payment, the facilities would be paid per diem, using
adjustments to a federal per diem base amount. The adjustments
were derived using regression analysis to determine relevant factors
to predict patient resources. The payment adjustors include both
facility-specific and patient-specific adjustments.
The final IPF PPS was developed using regression analysis data
obtained from the 2002 cost report file and 2002 Medicare Provider Analysis and Review (MEDPAR) data for IPF stays. The effective date for implementing IPF PPS was for cost reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2005. The PPS was based
on the final federal per diem rate for Medicare patients and is updated yearly.
Auditing/Compliance
Practice Management
istock.com/hoodesigns
IPF PPS
Adjustment factor (ADJ) Payment for an individual patient is adjusted, due to certain
factors.
Inlier A time covered by the Medicare Severity-Diagnosis Related Group (MS-DRG)
payment period of a claim that includes fully paid days, coinsurance days, or days after
benefits have exhausted.
Outlier An additional payment made by Medicare for high-dollar claims, intended to
protect hospitals from large financial losses due to unusually expensive cases.
Comorbidity The presence of one or more additional disorders (or diseases) cooccurring with a primary disease or disorder, or the effect of such additional disorders
or diseases. The additional disorder may also be a behavioral or mental disorder.
Comorbidity ADJ Adjustment factor reimbursement based on a comorbidity category.
CODING/BILLING
DRG
Adjust
056
1.05
057
1.05
080
1.07
081
1.07
876
1.22
880
1.05
Depressive neuroses
881
0.99
882
1.02
883
1.02
884
1.03
Psychoses
885
1.00
886
0.99
884
0.92
894
0.97
895
1.02
896
0.88
897
0.88
www.aapc.com
April 2016
39
CODING/BILLING
IPF PPS
Resources
CMS.gov Inpatient Psychiatric Facility PPS: www.cms.gov/Medicare/Medicare-Fee-forService-Payment/InpatientPsychFacilPPS/index.html
Tools and Worksheets: www.cms.gov/Medicare/Medicare-Fee-for-Service-Payment/
InpatientPsychFacilPPS/tools.html
IPF PPS Regulations and Notices: www.cms.gov/Medicare/Medicare-Fee-for-ServicePayment/InpatientPsychFacilPPS/IPF-PPS-Regulations-and-Notices.html
The Medicare Claims Processing Manual, chapter 3 - Inpatient Hospital Billing, section
190.5.2 Application of Code First: www.cms.gov/Regulations-and-Guidance/
Guidance/Manuals/downloads/clm104c03.pdf
40
Table B: The IPF PPS has 17 comorbidity categories, each with an adjustment factor.
Description of comorbidity
Adjustment factor
Developmental disabilities
1.04
1.13
Tracheostomy
1.06
1.11
1.11
Oncology treatment
1.07
1.05
1.13
1.12
Infectious disease
1.07
1.03
Cardiac conditions
1.11
Gangrene
1.10
1.12
1.08
1.09
Poisoning
1.11
Comorbidity Adjustments
Another patient-specific adjustment factor relates to the length of
stay. A variable per diem adjustment factor depends on several things.
For example, day one depends on if your facility has a qualified ER.
If it does, the adjustment factor is 1.31; if not, the adjustment factor
is 1.19, as shown in Table C on the next page. The adjustments
recognize the higher cost incurred in the early days of a stay.
To discuss this
article or topic, go to
www.aapc.com
IPF PPS
Day 2
1.12
Day 13
0.99
Day 3
1.08
Day 14
0.99
Day 4
1.05
Day 15
0.98
Day 5
1.04
Day 16
0.97
Day 6
1.02
Day 16
0.97
Day 7
1.01
Day 17
0.97
Day 8
1.01
Day 18
0.96
Day 9
1.00
Day 19
0.95
Day 10
1.00
Day 20
0.95
Day 11
0.99
Day 21
0.95
Day 12
0.99
After Day 21
0.92
CODING/BILLING
Documentation Is Key
As health information management or coding professionals, you
should work to educate practitioners and clinicians on required
documentation, so you can fully and accurately account for a patients DRG and comorbidity adjustments. You should ensure all
active medical treatment and diagnoses are captured in the medical
record documentation, and remind practitioners to connect clinical
dots to substantiate treatment patients receive.
Heather Greene, MBA, RHIA, CPC, CPMA, is assistant vice president of compliance and
process improvement for Haven Behavioral Healthcare, Inc. She has approximately 20 years
of experience in a variety of health information management roles. Greene performs coding
and documentation audits, physician education, and process improvement for the Haven Behavioral Health, Inc. psychiatric facilities. She is a member of the Florence, Ky., local chapter.
www.aapc.com
April 2016
41
AUDITING/COMPLIANCE
By Sue Miller
istock.com/SKapl
Sue Miller has a 10-page memorandum explaining the new HIPAA final
rule in depth. You may contact her at tmsam@aol.com or (978) 505-5660.
Coding/Billing
Auditing/Compliance
Practice Management
Be Our Guest
GOLD
SILVER
BRONZE
IMO-Intelligent Medical
Objects
ionHealthcare
Kelly Services, Inc.
KIWI-TEK
Langley Provider
Group
Libman Education
Litmos Healthcare
MAAP Healthcare
Matrix Medical Network
Maxim Health
Information Services
McGraw-Hill Education
MedKoder, LLC
Mid-Atlantic
Permanente Medical
Group
myTRICARE.com
NAMAS
Ohana Healthcare LLC
Optum360
Panacea | MedLearn
Publishing
Perry Johnson &
Associates
RCM Health Care
Services
Reimbursement
Management
Consultants, Inc
Surgicode LLC
The Coding Institute
The College of St.
Scholastica
Ultimate Medical
Academy
United Audit Systems,
Inc.
Wolters Kluwer
Zhealth Publishing, LLC
AUDITING/COMPLIANCE
By Michael D. Miscoe, JD, CPC, CASCC, CUC, CCPC, CPCO, CPMA
insurance companies,
to identify potentially
wasteful spending.
NEW! Osteogenesis stimulators OIG will look at lumpsum purchase versus rental.
They will determine whether potential savings can be achieved by Medicare and its beneficiaries if osteogenesis stimulators are rented over a 13-month period, rather than acquired through a lumpsum purchase.
Regarding billing and payments of medical equipment and supplies, the OIG is focusing on:
Power mobility devices supplier compliance
with payment requirements
Nebulizer machines and related drugs supplier
compliance with payment requirements
Effectiveness of system edits for diabetes testing
supplies to prevent inappropriate payments for
blood glucose test strips and lancets to multiple
suppliers
NEW! Orthotic braces OIG will review Medicare Part B payments for orthotic braces to determine whether durable medical
equipment, prosthetics, orthotics, and supplies (DMEPOS) suppliers claims were medically necessary and were supported in accordance with Medicare requirements. OIG makes clear that compliance with documentation requirements and utilization guidance outlined in the local coverage determinations (LCDs) issued by the DMEPOS Medicare administrative contractor will be
the focus of its analysis. DME suppliers should review published
Medicare guidance to ensure compliance.
NEW! Increased billing for ventilators OIG has noticed a significant increase in billing for ventilators (specifically, HCPCS
Coding/Billing
Auditing/Compliance
Practice Management
istock.com/macgyverhh
Work Plan
AUDITING/COMPLIANCE
April 2016
45
To discuss this
article or topic, go to
www.aapc.com
AUDITING/COMPLIANCE
Work Plan
Resources
For details pertaining to ongoing reviews, which are listed in this article only by name,
or for details regarding risk areas associated with Part C, Part D, and Medicaid programs,
please refer to the 2016 OIG Work Plan: http://oig.hhs.gov/reports-and-publications/
archives/workplan/2016/oig-work-plan-2016.pdf.
Medicare National Coverage Determinations Manual, 280.1: www.cms.gov/
Regulations-and-Guidance/Guidance/Manuals/downloads/ncd103c1_part4.pdf
Medicare Claims Processing Manual, publication 100-04, chapter 12, 30.6.15.1: www.
cms.gov/Regulations-and-Guidance/Guidance/Manuals/downloads/clm104c12.pdf
For details regarding coverage requirements for histocompatibility laboratories, see 42
CFR 413.9(a), (b), and (c)(3): www.cms.gov/Medicare/Medicare-Fee-for-ServicePayment/ClinicalLabFeeSched/downloads/413_9.pdf
For requirements pertaining to cost reporting, see 42 CFR 413.24(a), (c): www.gpo.
gov/fdsys/pkg/CFR-2011-title42-vol2/pdf/CFR-2011-title42-vol2-sec413-24.pdf
Smart Design.
Intelligent Auditing.
Customize, manage, train and simplify your audit process. We streamlined your
audit process by merging audit workow, management, and reporting
capabilities into one easy-to-use, web-based solution.
HEALTHICITY.COM/AUDITMANAGER
AUDITING/COMPLIANCE
By Lisa Jensen, MHBL, FACMPE, CPC
With limited resources and dollars, youll need to define the scope
of the mock audit to your highest risk areas. Start by determining
if past risk areas have been resolved. If no issues rise to the top, use
resources such as benchmarking data and common error reports to
assess risk. Good resources are the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), the Office of Inspector General (OIG), Comprehensive Error Rate Testing, Medical Group Management Association (MGMA) survey data, specialty society member Web
tools, etc.
The OIGs top hits for auditing can be found in the OIG Work
Plan. Common targets of the OIG are:
Improper application of modifier 25 Significant, separately
identifiable evaluation and management service by the same
physician or other qualified health care professional on the
same day of the procedure or other service and modifier 59
Distinct procedural service;
Coding/Billing
Auditing/Compliance
Practice Management
istock.com/pbophotographer
Mock Audit
AUDITING/COMPLIANCE
CPT
Frequency
Percentage
99201
8,184
1%
99202
90,835
5%
99203
494,415
30%
99204
784,102
47%
99205
282,662
17%
Total
1,660,198
Next, calculate a percentage for each code. For example, divide the
frequency number that internal medicine physicians coded 99201
(8,184) by the total of new patient codes reported (1,660,198). The
result tells us that internal medicine physicians coded 99201 approximately 1 percent of the time when billing Medicare for a lowlevel, new patient office visit in 2014.
Chart B
30%
17%
1%
99201
5%
99202
99203
99204
99205
www.aapc.com
April 2016
49
AUDITING/COMPLIANCE
Mock Audit
Time to Audit
After you identify the areas, providers, and codes that should be
targeted, its time to conduct the audit. Pulling a sample of, for instance, 10 charts per provider or 10 percent of total targeted charts
may be a good way to start, and keep the workload manageable.
External consultants may have other recommendations based on
the total volume of your practice and the types of services you bill.
The coding should be consistent with the auditing tools provided by your Medicare carrier, private payers, and standard coding
auditing guidance, including those found in the CPT and ICD
codebooks.
Tip: AAPCs Healthicity medical auditing software provides two viable solutions for internal
auditing: Audit Manager is an all-in-one audit management solution that simplifies the
audit workflow and takes the guesswork out of the audit process; Audit Services enables
you to pool from our nationwide network of credentialed auditors to conduct medical
chart reviews, medical record and documentation review, and audit validation. For more
information, visit: www.aapc.com/audit-management-software.aspx.
For information on this years OIG Work Plan, check out 2016
OIG Work Plan: Part B Risk Areas on pages 44-46 of this issue of Healthcare Business Monthly and 2016 OIG Work Plan:
Part A Risk Areas on pages 44-46 of Marchs Healthcare Business Monthly.
lem focused examination; Straightforward medical decision making,
but documentation would have supported 99213 Office or other
outpatient visit for the evaluation and management of an established
patient, which requires at least 2 of these 3 key components: An expanded problem focused history; An expanded problem focused examination; Medical decision making of low complexity. You should also
provide each physician with a copy of his or her charts with the reviewers comments.
If youre concerned that some providers may disregard the feedback, you can place a redacted summary for all providers to see.
In this summary, let each provider know which data represents
their results, but block out the others. They can see how they did
in comparison with their peers. Many find this sort of competition very motivating.
To discuss this
article or topic, go to
www.aapc.com
Mock Audit
Overcome Obstacles
If a physician refuses to adapt his or her coding and documentation patterns to ensure compliance with applicable regulations,
disciplinary action may be warranted.
A very real danger is that you will conduct the audit and identify
errors, but will have no support to correct them. Knowing there is
an issue that your practice has done nothing to correct can create
a huge liability risk. To gain support, make the process as fun as
possible. For example, you might create T-shirts, candy bar wrappers, and notes with sayings such as, I Rock the Mock, Be Audit You Can Be! Keep Calm and Audit On, or Dont Make Me
Use My Audit Voice.
AUDITING/COMPLIANCE
To gain support you might create T-shirts, candy bar wrappers, and
notes with sayings such as, I Rock the Mock, Be Audit You Can Be!
Keep Calm and Audit On, or Dont make me use my audit voice.
www.aapc.com/Workshops
AAPC's virtual workshops
gives you more of what
you need:
Up to 6 CEUs
4 hours of virtual presentation
Authored and presented by leading experts
In-depth information on critical topics
Workshop Features:
800-626-2633 | aapc.com/workshops
www.aapc.com
April 2016
51
PRACTICE MANAGEMENT
By Lori A. Cox, MBA, CPC, CPMA, CPC-I, CEMC
istock.com/Igor Zakowski
The
Doctor
Said
What
When medical
situations get
serious, sometimes
the medical
record becomes
humorous.
Mark Twain
He went outside to attempt the fetus chickens. Feed. Feed the
chickens.
A teenage driver lost control throwing a banana out the
window. Thats what you get for littering, kids.
Pts trial of a small amount of alcohol each afternoon may not
be working well, according to her daughter. Maybe the dose
needs to be adjusted?
Male with an ax in his head. He states his wife did it because
he asked her if it was that time of the month. And yes, he
lived.
Many thanks to the team who shared their hillarious notes: Karen
Lavigne, CPC, CPMA, CRC; Marcelle Viator, CPC, CRC; Kristie Fissler, CPC, CPMA, COC, COSC; Brenda Stevens, CPC,
CPMA, CRC; Jen Bueddeman, CPC, CRC; Kelley Sorenson,
CPC; Dawn Catanese, CPC, COC, CRC; and Colette Bohon,
CPC, CRC.
Coding/Billing
Auditing/Compliance
Practice Management
AMA
Each CPT Coding Essentials title includes CPT code for surgeries, medicine and ancillary services, paired with:
Illustrations and plain English descriptions of the service represented by the code
Official, code-specific instructions and parenthetical information from the AMAs CPT Professional codebook
ICD-10-CM codes mapped by coding experts
RVUs, global periods and modifier payment rules
References to CMSs Pub 100 and the AMAs CPT Assistant newsletter
Series includes:
PRACTICE MANAGEMENT
By Ken Camilleis, CPC, CPC-I, COSC, CMRS, CCS-P
Auditing/Compliance
Practice Management
shutterstock.com
The Nine Cs of
Clinical Documentation Improvement
CDI
1. Clarity
The doctor may be able to read his own handwriting, but if you cant
make it out, the documentation is worthless. It shouldnt be your responsibility to decipher something illegible or ambiguous, and risk
miscoding based on that interpretation. Providers who are still using pen and ink need to be enlightened to the 21st century, where
we have sophisticated electronic health record (EHR) templates.
Shockingly, some practitioners with EHRs are still in the habit of
preparing their notes manually and relying on a scanner to transmit
them; this should be discouraged while using technological resources should be encouraged.
2. Consistency
Medical notes must not contain any words or sentences that could
be interpreted as inconsistent with the diagnosis assessed or the procedure performed. Consistency of documentation is important not
only for coding accuracy, but also for compliance. Its easy to slip up
on this if close attention is not paid to the chronology of the patients
present illness and treatment. In the event of an external audit or a
payer request for supporting documentation, the documenter must
be able to back up a claim of medical necessity. Inconsistencies in the
encounter note diminish the preparers credibility.
3. Completeness
As we strive to capture the entire clinical picture of the patient, its
important for the physician to document all information pertinent
to the patients diagnosis, such as any current and recently discontinued medications and changes in condition status. For example:
If a patient is diagnosed with septic arthritis or bursitis, the
organism causing the sepsis should be documented.
If a patient returns with lower sugar readings a week after
diabetes was assessed as out of control, controlled diabetes
(reflected by the lower readings) should be documented for
the current encounter.
Hypoxia caused by respiratory failure should be documented
for accuracy of coding, as well as clarity of the illness severity.
If a lysis of adhesions was performed, what organs or
structures were released? If an acquired absence of an organ
is relevant to a physicians finding, it should be documented
and picked up by you.
It may not be sufficient to simply document status post surgery
because you may need to know whether a complication was actually post-procedural or caused by the surgery. Be sure to list any potentially related comorbid conditions. Key elements missing from
the clinical note disservice the coders and billers, as well as quality of care.
4. Cohesion
There are many different styles of clinical notes, but whether the
practitioner uses a SOAP, CHEDDAR*, or narrative format, the underlying document should outline the patients chief complaint and
other related subjective data, as well as objective data, and smoothly segue into the assessment of the patients condition and the course
of action the provider will pursue.
*SOAP stands for subjective, objective, assessment plan and
CHEDDAR stands for chief complaint, history of presenting
illness, examination, details, drugs and dosages, assessment, return
visit information or referral.
5. Coder Friendliness
Physicians sometimes document in terms only they understand. You
may need to learn quickly about what is documented; Internet researching often helps, but its not a cure-all. You and your physicians
should educate each other.
www.aapc.com
April 2016
55
PRACTICE MANAGEMENT
PRACTICE MANAGEMENT
CDI
6. Concision
9. Credibility
Ideal documentation stays on point with the patients current problem and the reason for seeking medical care. Its not necessary to
enumerate (or copy and paste) the patients entire medical history
or medication regimen, or make statements in the note that have
no bearing on treatment of the condition being managed or a related procedure being performed. Despite extreme severity of certain comorbid illnesses that must remain a part of the patients record of active problems, a specialist does not need to reiterate conditions if they are not relevant to the encounter. Concise documentation speeds up the coding process because you arent bogged down
reading superfluous text.
Credibility is one of the most important facets of CDI. When coding for professional services, medical staff including on-site and
off-site coders cannot use working diagnoses to code actual
findings. Words such as question of, probable, or likely preceding a clinical diagnostic term negate that term because no actual diagnosis has been established. If the physician has determined
the actual diagnosis, he or she should not add words in the documentation that cast doubt on the finding.
During the dictation and transcription process, you must be careful with cloned documentation, which is boilerplate text lifted
(i.e., copied and pasted) from one patient visit to the next (or even
from one patient to another). Such habits are fraught with peril, especially if cloned text hasnt been proofread for parameters that can
vary from encounter to encounter or patient to patient.
As deemed necessary, subordinate data entry should be qualitycontrolled at a checkpoint before a claim is submitted. This checkpoint should primarily be the responsibility of the clinical staff because the workflow may completely bypass you if no major edits are
caught between the EHR and the billing pipeline.
7. Compartmentalization
Sometimes physicians will document everything they are supposed to, but in no particular order or pattern. This may cause you
to overlook information germane to accurate coding.
Most EHR packages provide medical practice staff with the capability to design sophisticated templates from which they can fill
in the details of their progress note in a timely, cost-effective manner. In the EHR, the most valuable feature of the compartmentalization process is the ability to standardize the location of any key
element within the note. This greatly eases validating a charge or
coding the note from scratch, saves time, and creates a much less
error-prone workflow.
For instance, if a patient is given an inhalation treatment or a vaccination, the details of this procedure (drug dosage, constituents,
etc.) can be entered into a field called Orders, and you will always
know to look there for this piece of data.
8. Cleanliness
A clinical note riddled with grammatical and typographical errors
lacks professionalism and can create repercussions down the revenue cycle, including the possibility of a payer audit. Language bar56
To discuss this
article or topic, go to
www.aapc.com
CDI
PRACTICE MANAGEMENT
www.aapc.com
April 2016
57
PRACTICE MANAGEMENT
By John Verhovshek, MA, CPC
ooking for work is hard enough: Dont hurt your chances with a
wardrobe that fails to make a good impression. Here are a few insights from individuals on the front lines, with the responsibility
to fill open positions within their organizations.
The consensus: Be neat, polished, professional, and not too flashy.
And remember: Youre never fully dressed without a smile.
Coding/Billing
Auditing/Compliance
Practice Management
To discuss this
article or topic, go to
www.aapc.com
Job Hunting
PRACTICE MANAGEMENT
istock.com/Michalel Jung
www.aapc.com
April 2016
59
CPC
Aarti B Menghrajani, CPC
Abraham Grimas, CPC
Adam Walker, CPC
Africa Ware, CPC
Agnieszka Popowski, CPC
Aimee Haydel, CPC
Alex Gonzalez, CPC
Alfredo Nasiff Hadad, CPC
Alisa R Hillock, CPC
Alisha Eifert, CPC
Altrese Jacob, CPC
Alyson Merrill, CPC
Amber Meade, CPC
Amell M Solano, CPC
Ana Cruz, CPC
Anays Fundora, CPC
Andrea Checovich, CPC
Andrea Hochstatter, COC, CPC, CEDC
Anessa Marie Uberroth, CPC
Angela Barber, CPC
Angela Jean Hall, CPC
Angelique Rodriguez, CPC
Anna Melendez, CPC
Anuradha Lakshminarayanan, COC, CPC
Aramis Paz, CPC
Arathy Radhakrishnan, CPC
Arlene Padron Alfonso, CPC
Ashley Creel, CPC
Ashley Meyers, CPC
Ashok Reddy Marella, COC
Athena Parscal, CPC
Autumn Cope, CPC
Awilda Agosto, CPC
Barbara Helen Sweeney, CPC
60
Apprentice
Aalapati Anusha, COC-A
Abhilash S, CPC-A
Abhisha Surabhi, COC-A
Abigail Rich, CPC-A
Ablessin Johnson, CPC-A
Ache. Shravan, CPC-A
Ada Chin, CPC-A
Adam Gold, CPC-A
Adapa Deepak Kumar, CPC-A
Adele Ciruti, CPC-A
Adrianna Brinker, CPC-A
Adrianne Hughes, CPC-A
Adrienne Lozano, CPC-A
www.aapc.com
April 2016
61
62
www.aapc.com
April 2016
63
64
Specialties
Abhinav Kumar Maurya, CPC-A, CIC
Afiya Richards, CPC, CPMA
Aileen Panganiban, CIC
Ajudia Rupal Damjibhai, CIC
Alexandra Garkey, CPB
Alexis Perez, CPB
Alfredo Ramones, CIC
Alisa Hermansen, CPC, CPC-I, CRC
Alva Elano, CRC
Alvin Cyrel Albino, CIC
Amaechi Lawrence Ofunne, CPC, CPMA,
CEMC, CGSC, CPRC
Amanda Castro, CPB
Amanda Proctor, CPC, CRC
Amit Dhingra, CIC
Amy Fields, CPC, CRC
Amy M Decker, CPC, CRC
Amy Powell Gross, CPB, COBGC
Amy Shilliam, CPC, CPCO
Amy Walker, COC, CPC, CPB, CPMA,
CEDC, CRC
Anand Babu Ponnusamy, COC, CPC, CIC
Ananda Kumar, CPC, CRC
Anandhan Sivagnanam, CPC, CPMA
Andrea Crowe, CPB, COBGC
Andrea Mitchell, CPC, CRC
Angela D Brown, CPC, COSC
Angela Larsen, CPC, CRC
Angela S Romero, CPC, CEMC
Angela Swartz, CPC, CPB
Angelica Gatchalian, CIC
Angelique Wilson, CPC, CRC
Anirudh Ekbote, CPC, CIC
CPMA, CRC
Heather McCallum, CPC, CCC
Helen Kirkland, CPB
Hilda Garcia, CPC, CPMA
Hillary Julien, CPCO
Himanshu Sharma, CPC-A, CIC
Hollie Lindley, CPB
Imamsaheb Shaik, CIC
Inay Iriban, CPC, CPMA
Indhira Kalaiparthiban Rajendran, CIC
Ines Agnes Morales, CIC
Izel Silva, CPC, CPMA, CRC
Jade Ariel Reeves, CPC, COBGC
Jagjeet Singh, CIC
Jamie Addler, COC, CPB, CPMA
Jamie Jo Pool, CPC, CPB
Jamie Taylor, CPB
Jan Lambert, CRC
Jan Marie Flanders, COC, CPC, CASCC
Jana Gustafson, COC, CPC, CPCO,
CPMA, CRC
Jana Morgan, CPB
Janice Douglas, CPC, CPMA, CEMC
Janice Raffa, CPC-A, CRC
Janis Stelzner, CPC, CRC
Jason Knowles, CPCO
Javeed Mohamed Kalil, CPC, CIC
Jayalakshmi Kulanthaimani, CRC
Jayesh Ramteke, CPC, CRC
Jefferson Esperida, CRC
Jelene Roxas, CPB
Jennie E Moody, COC, CPC, CRC
Jennifer Kniffen, CPC, CGSC
Jennifer L Deal, CPC, CPMA, CEMC
Jenny Harvey, CPC, CPMA
Jerame Capacia-Castro, CRC
Jessica Fenolio, COC, CPB, CASCC
Jhan Jester Solmoro, CPC-A, CIC
Joan Aileen Del Mundo, CIC
Joan M Bartholomew, COC, CPC, CRC
Joan Marie Dion, CPC, CRC
Jodi Long, CPB
Jody Hart, CPC, CRC
Jody Mortensen, CPC, CEMC
John Philip Martinez, CIC
John Ray Elders, COC, CRC
John Sauder, CPC, CPPM
Jonel Gomez, CPCO
Joseph Hughes, CPPM
Joy Anne Monteverde, CRC
Joyce Daquipil, CIC
Judith Andrea Facey, CPC-P, CRC
Judith Carol Quesnel, COBGC
Judybeth Fernandez, CPC, CPC-P, CRC
Julia Brauer, CPB
Julianne Thomas, CPC, CRC
Justine Basa Asilo-Daelo, CPC, CPMA
Kamaal Ahmed, CIC
Karen Fan, COC, CPC, CRC
Karen Summers Clinard, CPC-P-A, CRC
Karen Tinoco, CPC, CPMA, CRC
Karen Webb, CPC, CANPC, CIC, CPCD
Karen Worrell, CPB
Karen Y Manigault, CPC, CPMA, CEDC,
CEMC
Kari Leigh Giles, CPC, CRC
Karthick Jayaraj, CPC, CEDC
Karthikeyan Thandapani, CIC
Kasinath Thalikota, CIC
Kathleen Guzzi, CPC, CIC
Kathleen M Skolnick, COC, CPC, CPCO,
CPB, CPMA, CPPM, CPC-I, CEMC, CRC
Kathryn Jones, CPC, CRC
www.aapc.com
April 2016
65
GOT A MINUTE?
If you are an AAPC member who strives to advance
the business of healthcare, we want to know about it!
Please contact Michelle Dick, executive editor, at
michelle.dick@aapc.com, to learn how to be featured.
66
Land
Your
Dream
Job
Land
Your Dream Job
Accelerate your career and remove your apprentice
Accelerate your
career and
your apprentice
designation
withremove
Practicode.
designation with Practicode.
Practicode gives you the experience you need to get the job you want. With over 600
Practicode
gives you
the experience
youone
need
toof
getcoding
the job
you want.and
Withget
over
600
real-world coding
exercises,
youll earn
year
experience
closer
real-world
coding exercises,
youll earn
one year
of coding
and
to removing
your apprentice
status.
Its your
career.experience
Take control
ofget
it. closer
to removing your apprentice status. Its your career. Take control of it.
800-626-2633
800-626-2633
aapc.com/practicode
aapc.com/practicode
Powered by
Powered by
All-in-one
Compliance For All