Professional Documents
Culture Documents
List of Tables
Table 1 CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET FROM 2011-2013 ......................................................... 14
Table 2 CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENT FROM 2011-2013 ................................................. 16
Table 3: Statement of Changes of Equity ................................................................................................... 17
Table 4 STATEMENT OF CASH FLOW FROM 2011-2013 ................................................................... 20
Table 5 RENATA LIMITED FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS ...................................................................... 21
Table 6: Calculation of Depreciation .......................................................................................................... 23
Table 7: Condensed Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income .................................................. 25
Table 8: Horizontal Analysis of Condensed Income Statement ................................................................. 26
Table 9: HORIZONTAL ANALYSIS OF BALANCE SHEET FROM 2010-2013 .................................. 27
Table 10: Condensed Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income ................................................ 29
Table 11: Condensed Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Balance Sheet ...................................... 30
Table 13: Liquidity Ration Analysis ........................................................................................................... 38
Table 14: Efficiency (Activity) Ratios ........................................................................................................ 39
Table 15: Solvency Ration Analysis for the years 2009-2013 .................................................................... 42
Table 16: Other Ratios Analysis for the years 2009-2013 .......................................................................... 42
List of Figures
Figure 1: Horizontal Analysis of Income Statements with 2009 as base year ............................................ 27
Figure 2: Horizontal Analysis of Condensed Balance Sheet .................................................................. 28
Figure 3: Vertical Analysis of Income Statement ....................................................................................... 30
Figure 4: Vertical Analysis of Condensed Balance Sheet .......................................................................... 31
Figure 5: Trend of Net Turnover................................................................................................................. 32
Figure 6: Trend of Net income .................................................................................................................... 32
Figure 7: Trend of Gross profit ................................................................................................................... 33
Figure 8: Trend of Dividends ...................................................................................................................... 33
Figure 9: Comparing EPS and DPS ............................................................................................................ 34
Figure 10: Comparing Turnover, Income and Dividends ........................................................................... 34
Figure 11: Comparing Income, Current Assets and Liabilities................................................................... 35
Figure 12: Profitability Ratio Analysis ....................................................................................................... 37
Figure 13: Comparing the Liquidity Ratios ................................................................................................ 38
Figure 14: Activity Ratios ........................................................................................................................... 40
Figure 15: Comparing A/R Collection and Inventory Holding Period ....................................................... 40
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The report was commissioned to examine analyze the financial data provided in the annual
reports of Renata Limited and conclude on the overall financial health of the organization. The
financial analysis of Renata ltd is done to measure the overall efficiency and performance. It also
used to analysis the pharmaceutical company past financial performance and to establish the
future trend of financial position
Horizontal analysis is done evaluating a series of financial statement data over a period of last
four years 2010-2013 .Vertical analysis is done evaluating the financial statement for the last
four years 2010-2013 taking each year amount as the base and Ratio analysis is used for the
measurement of profitability, liquidity position, solvency and debt coverage situations.
The company is reasonably profitable with a consistence in performance. It is seen that the
Turnover, Gross profit, Operating profit and Total comprehensive income for the year increases
from 2010 to 2013. While analyzing the Balance Sheet, company asset is increasing along with
the owners equity. The total current liability decreased from 2012 to 2013.
The Cost of Sales has remained almost constant. Gross Profit has reduced slightly over the years.
Operating expenses has reduced noticeably. While Operating Profit has increased steadily over
the years, the Net Income has abridged slightly.
Having total Assets and Total Liabilities and Owners Equity as the base, it is seen that Current
Assets increased regularly between years 2009 and 2010. Current Assets show a gradual
decrease with only 2012 showing a minor increase. Equity saw a sharp decrease between 2009
and 2013. Total Liabilities was the only portion showing gradual increase during 2009-2013.
Turnover from 2010 to 2013 has gradually increased and so did the dividend, while EPS has
increased dramatically over the, DPS remained constant. Current Liabilities seems to have a
fluctuating record. Profitability Ratios of Renata Limited is seen to have a slow but steady
decline from 2009 to 2013. The trend of Net Profit Margin however is unstable. EPS however
has increased over the years.
Liquidity Ratio shows a gradual decrease of both Current Ratio and Quick (Acid Test) Ratio.
Total Asset Turnover shows a major fall from 2009 to 2013. Accounts Receivable turnover
reduced over the years which are shown by the Average Receivables Collection Period mounting
from 32days to 41 days.
Also, Inventory Holding Period showed an ongoing decrease in the first 2 years which was
roofed by the last 2 year and remained almost same. Debt to Equity Ratio shows a regular
increase, while the Interest Coverage Ratio shows a major dip between 2009 and 2013.
Meanwhile, the Debt to Asset Ratio showed a sharp increase.
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Performance evaluation of a company is used to show how well a company can utilized it assets,
shareholder equity and liability, revenue and expenses and earn profit. Financial ratio analysis is
one of the best tools of performance evaluation of any company, determining the financial
position of company.
The financial statement analysis is important for different reasons:
Holding of Share
Extension of Credit
Shareholders are
the owners of the
company.
The management
takes decisions,
formulating plans
and policies for the
future.
Shareholders
would be able to
take decisions such
as holdings the
company's share or
sell them out by
analysis of financial
statement .
The analysis of
financial statement
would allow them
to evaluate the
companys
performance and
effectiveness.
The financial
statement analysis
provides important
information such
as the liquidity
states for their
purpose.
Investment
Decision
The investors
would invest in the
company for
profitable
opportunities.
From the financial
statement analysis
they can obtain
useful information
for their
investment
decision making
purpose.
11
importers, exporters, commission agents of all kinds of goods and services including
pharmaceutical products.
2.3.3 RENATA ONCOLOGY LIMITED
Renata Oncology Limited, a subsidiary company of Renata Limited, was incorporated on 12
August 2012 as a private limited company under the Companies Act 1994 with authorized share
capital of Taka 1,000,000,000 divided into 100,000,000 ordinary shares of Taka 10 each. The
company not yet commenced its commercial operation. The principal activities of the company
are to carry on business of manufacturing, marketing and distribution of drugs and medicines,
allopathic and indigenous and particularly produce and prepare biological and non-biological
drugs, injectable of all kinds of tablets of all sorts, serum, vaccines syrup both medicated and
non-medicated.
3.0 CONTENT
3.1 STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN THE REPORT:
Balance Sheet
Income Statement
The contents here were, Inventories, Book debts, Advances, Deposits and prepayments, other receivables, cash and cash equivalents
Fixed assets
Tangible assets contain Property, Plant and Equipment, Capital work in progress
and investments, which remain in business for a long period of time
Intangibles assets like the value of trademarks, copyrights, and a difficult category
known as "good will.
Includes, Balance from creditors and accruals, short term loans, Current portion of
long term loans and provision for taxation.
Fixed Liabilities
Long-term liabilities are debts to lenders, mortgage holders, and other creditors
payable over a longer span of time.
13
2013
2012
2011
2010
ASSETS
Non-current assets
Property, plant and equipment
6,762,838,079
4,618,057,755
4,135,692,220 2,787,867,721
Capital work-in-progress
2,178,970,232
2,095,046,123
1,373,322,236 363,998,451
75,166,811
37,166,268
49,018,164
Other Investment
18,881,156
49,473,309
9,035,856,278
6,799,743,455
163,549,385
5,558,032,620 3,315,415,557
Current assets
Inventories
2,763,455,400
2,119,780,626
1,671,591,749 1,357,858,812
875,057,900
761,068,799
614,736,271
475,929,184
prepayments
174,165,543
153,839,131
105,582,664
117,244,930
253,481,805
338,591,526
161,377,082
210,014,008
4,066,160,648
3,373,280,082
2,553,287,766 2,161,046,934
Total assets
353,023,430
282,418,750
225,935,000
180,748,000
Revaluation surplus
157,477,415
157,955,917
158,434,421
154,118,455
286,084,982
242,592,280
167,426,501
160,148,728
Retained earnings
5,741,278,054
4,623,411,688
3,695,533,913 2,789,155,479
6,537,863,881
5,306,378,635
4,247,329,835 3,284,170,662
Non-controlling interest
37,733
35,966
42,392
Total equity
6,537,901,614
5,306,414,601
4,247,372,227 3,284,216,062
45,400
Non-current liabilities
Long term loans - net of current
477,306,667
281,670,201
61,803,855
14
portion
Non-convertible bond - net of
current portion
1,000,000,000
149,138,826
138,540,457
214,316,148
175,366,283
198,004,754
152,716,016
473,840,609
272,041,423
1,165,463,424
1,729,077,907
408,947,435
291,256,473
Current liabilities
Short term loan and overdraft
3,057,538,347
1,896,082,318
2,440,284,549 1,129,414,884
229,743,333
133,333,333
57,327,673
33,354,814
portion
1,000,000,000
347,582,022
230,081,535
452,003,962
342,827,054
347,035,714
317,662,207
278,214,611
354,765,257
Unclaimed dividend
9,915,748
7,907,075
6,551,459
5,164,759
371,235,887
402,615,993
256,219,307
185,311,757
5,398,651,888
3,137,531,030
3,455,000,724 1,900,989,956
Total liabilities
6,564,115,312
4,866,608,937
3,863,948,159 2,192,246,429
Operating Profit:
15
Comprehensive
Income for the year:
2012
2011
2010
Turnover
9,130,607,862
7,858,515,209
6,734,085,041
5,424,443,357
Cost of sales
Gross profit
4,480,760,696
4,049,418,230
3,440,849,802
2,849,325,211
Operating expenses:
Administrative, selling and
distribution expenses
Operating profit
2,405,474,010
2,115,190,178
1,693,035,311
1,438,526,947
Other income
32,579,378
26,984,270
27,907,198
11,113,587
398,849
-218,312
-3,518,170
593,908
Finance costs
-451,030,569
-386,837,269
-220,683,462
-117,736,847
-9,234,832
-8,195,771
Gain/(loss) on disposal of
Other expense
Contribution to WPPF
-94,570,671
-85,618,793
-71,941,847
-62,996,798
1,892,850,997
1,669,500,074
1,415,564,198
1,261,305,026
Current tax
-293,878,752
-400,607,201
-301,585,404
-235,561,756
Deferred tax
-201,956,568
-74,194,051
-50,240,589
-42,694,263
1,397,015,677
1,194,698,822
1,063,738,205
983,049,007
Tax expenses:
-1,158,365
3,764,204
-252,830
-6,474
16
translation
Total comprehensive income for
the year
1,400,779,881
1,194,445,992
1,066,653,114
981,890,642
holders
of
Renata
Limited
1,400,779,114
1,194,452,418
Non-controlling interest
767
-6,426
the year
1,400,779,881
1,194,445,992
1,066,653,114
981,890,642
Basic EPS
39.57
33.84
47.08
43.51
2010
2011
2012
2013
2,389,562,964
3,284,216,062
-86,759,041
-108,448,800
-135,561,000
-169,451,250
157,382
4,951,851
157,382
157,382
4,247,372,227 5,306,414,601
17
-635,885
981,890,642
1,066,653,114
1,000
3,284,216,062
4,247,372,227
assets
Total comprehensive income for the
1,194,445,992 1,400,779,881
year
Ltd.
Balance at 31 December 2013
5,306,414,601 6,537,901,614
19
2012
2011
2010
10,636,606,875
9,102,101,506
7,689,629,544
6,199,970,463
Payment of VAT
-1,277,054,798
-1,109,233,351
-912,693,792
-726,458,705
-7,688,399,823
-6,277,122,775
-5,461,659,005
-4,196,254,195
operation
1,671,152,254
1,715,745,380
1,315,276,747
1,277,257,563
Financing cost
-451,030,569
-386,837,269
-220,683,462
-117,736,847
Payment of tax
-325,393,752
-253,773,099
-231,384,361
-224,694,139
894,727,933
1,075,135,012
863,208,924
934,826,577
generated
from
of
property,
-2,588,066,531
-1,572,755,766
-2,611,030,943
-1,020,151,745
Investment in shares
-38,000,542
2,970,739
66,497,216
-137,652,352
1,551,705
200,000
767,812
1,325,050
-2,624,515,368
-1,569,585,027
-2,543,765,915
-1,156,479,047
1,812,120,291
-194,130,157
1,717,292,405
346,959,038
1,000,000,000
Sale proceeds of
property, plant and
equipment
Net cash used in investing
activities
20
Dividend
paid
to
shareholders
-167,442,577
-134,205,384
-85,372,340
-85,555,885
1,644,677,714
671,664,459
1,631,920,065
261,403,153
-85,109,721
177,214,444
-48,636,926
39,750,683
338,591,526
161,377,082
210,014,008
170,263,325
253,481,805
338,591,526
161,377,082
210,014,008
2010
2011
2012
2013
Share Capita
180,748
225,935
282,419
353,023
45,187
56,484
70,605
88,256
108,449
135,561
169,451
264,767
Revaluation surplus
154,118
158,434
157,956
157,477
124,166
131,444
206,609
249,497
Unappropriated Profit
2,358,802
3,250,750
4,183,440
5,182,094
Shareholder's Fund
2,971,470
3,958,608
5,070,480
6,295,114
291,256
347,143
1,805,741
1,153,678
Total
3,262,726
4,305,751
6,876,221
7,448,792
2,928,571
5,153,072
6,330,831
8,374,267
122,035
74,404
112,026
199,433
Current Assets
2,063,325
2,464,125
3,310,221
4,208,713
Current Liabilities
1,851,205
3,385,850
2,876,857
5,333,621
Application of Funds
21
Total
3,262,726
4,305,751
6,876,221
7,448,792
FINANCIAL RESULTS
Turnover (Gross)
5,816,777
7,432,233
8,780,774
10,034,450
Turnover (Net)
5,090,318
6,519,639
7,671,572
8,757,406
Gross Profit
2,684,956
3,420,283
4,051,959
4,440,631
EBITDA
1,404,686
1,886,177
2,379,956
3,146,433
1,129,603
1,438,837
1,721,978
1,885,359
852,587
1,087,719
1,247,528
1,390,164
851,428
1,090,634
1,247,275
1,393,928
Dividend
153,636
192,045
240,056
353,023
FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE
Number of shares
8,074,800
2,593,500
28,241,875
35,302,343
24.15
30.81
35.34
39.38
8.5
8.5
8.5
10
Dividend payout %
18.04
17.66
24.05
25.39
0.66
0.71
1.15
1.39
27.48
25.03
20.93
18.33
31 December
1,294.27
1,205.00
739.5
722
129.43
120.5
73.95
72.2
Fund %
28.69
27.48
24.6
22.08
1.11
0.73
1.15
0.79
34.79
39.84
38.5
25.96
(Taka)
131.52
175.21
179.54
178.32
Number of employees
3,115
3,393
3,902
4,334
Return on Shareholder's
22
2010
2011
2012
2013
Building
33.03
20-33.03
1.54-5
1.54-5
Plant and
5-20
5-20
5-20
5-20
Automobiles
25
25
Office equipment
8-10
8- 10
10-12-5
10-12-5
10
10
10
10
machinery
The rate of depreciation remains same for the Plant and machinery have been depreciated on
straight line basis. Depreciation is charged at the rates varying from 5%-20% depending on the
estimated useful lives of assets, similarly the rate of depreciation of furniture remain same for the
last 4 years.
23
The rate of depreciation of automobiles has increased from 2012 from 4% to 25%, similarly the
rate of depreciation of Office Equipment increased form 8-10% to 10-12.5% from the annual
year 2011 to 2012.
No depreciation is charged for land and capital work-in-progress. The company is following this
policy consistently for past years.
3.3.3 DISPOSAL OF PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
An item of property, plant and equipment is removed from the statement when it is disposed of
or when no future economic benefits are expected from its use or disposal. The gain or loss on
the disposal of an item of property, plant and equipment is included in the statement of income of
the period in which the assets are disposed of.
3.3.4 IMPAIRMENT
The carrying amounts of its assets are reviewed at each balance sheet date to determine whether
there is any indication of impairment loss. If any such indication exists, recoverable amount is
estimated in order to determine the extent of the impairment loss, if any. Impairment loss is
recorded on judgmental basis, for which provision may differ in the future years based on the
actual experience.
3.3.5 REVALUATION OF ASSETS
The assets were initially recognized at cost. Subsequently some assets were revalued by a
professional value which resulted in increase of carrying amount as well as creation of
revaluation reserve. The revaluation reserve released to retain earnings by the difference between
the depreciation charged on the revalued amount and that based on cost transferred from the
revaluation reserve to retained earnings.
3.3.6 INVENTORIES
Stocks are valued at lower of cost and net realizable value except for goods in transit which are
valued at cost.
Cost of active materials, raw materials and packing materials are valued by using FIFO formula.
Cost of work-in-progress and finished stocks are arrived at by using FIFO cost formula including
allocation of manufacturing overheads related to bringing the inventories to their present
The inventories for the last 4 years were calculated by FIFO method.
24
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
Turnover
4,102,594,775
5,424,443,357
6,734,085,041
7,858,515,209
9,130,607,862
Cost of sales
1,946,151,429
2,575,118,146
3,293,235,239
3,809,096,979
4,649,847,166
Gross Profit
2,156,443,346
2,849,325,211
3,440,849,802
4,049,418,230
4,480,760,696
Operating Expenses
1,136,524,399
1,410,798,264
1,747,814,491
1,934,228,052
2,075,286,686
25
Operating Profit
1,019,918,947
1,438,526,947
1,693,035,311
2,115,190,178
2,405,474,010
100,442,649
117,736,847
220,683,462
386,837,269
451,030,569
43,968,311
62,996,798
71,941,847
85,618,793
94,570,671
1,261,305,026 1,415,564,198
1,669,500,074
1,892,850,997
Finance cost
Contribution to
WPFF
Profit before tax
879,776,266
Tax Expenses
219,659,778
278,256,019
351,825,993
474,801,252
495,835,320
Net Income
660,116,488
981,890,642
1,066,653,114
1,194,445,992
1,400,779,881
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
Turnover
100.00%
132.22%
164.14%
191.55%
222.56%
Cost of sales
100.00%
132.32%
169.22%
195.72%
238.93%
Gross Profit
100.00%
132.13%
159.56%
187.78%
207.78%
Operating Expenses
100.00%
124.13%
153.79%
170.19%
182.60%
Operating Profit
100.00%
141.04%
166.00%
207.39%
235.85%
Finance cost
100.00%
117.22%
219.71%
385.13%
449.04%
Contribution to WPFF
100.00%
143.28%
163.62%
194.73%
215.09%
100.00%
143.37%
160.90%
189.76%
215.15%
Tax Expenses
100.00%
126.68%
160.17%
216.15%
225.73%
Net Income
100.00%
148.75%
161.59%
180.94%
212.20%
26
Percentage
250.00%
200.00%
150.00%
100.00%
50.00%
0.00%
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
100.00%
132.22%
164.14%
191.55%
222.56%
Cost of Sales
100%
132.32%
169.22%
195.72%
238.93%
Gross Profit
100%
132.13%
159.56%
187.78%
207.78%
Operating Expenses
100%
124.13%
153.79%
170.19%
182.60%
Operating Profit
100%
141.04%
166%
207.39%
235.85%
Net Income
100%
148.75%
161.59%
180.94%
212.20%
Turnover
2009
2010
2011
2012
2,208,262,855
3,050,606,199
5,227,476,247
6,442,857,255
8,573,700,405
Current Assets
1,643,106,431
2,081,678,039
2,464,125,653
3,310,220,716
4,208,712,799
Total Assets
3,851,369,286
5,132,284,238
7,691,601,900
9,753,077,971 12,782,413,204
Equity
2,207,279,956
2,971,470,944 3,958,608,036
5,070,479,748
6,295,114,611
234,362,730
291,256,473
347,143,580
1,672,407,706
1,153,677,518
1,409,726,600
1,869,556,821
3,385,850,284
3,010,190,517
5,333,621,075
1,644,089,330
2,160,813,294
3,732,993,864
4,682,598,223
6,487,298,593
Non-current
Assets
Non-Current
Liabilities
Current
Liabilities
Total Liabilities
2013
27
Total Liabilities
and Equity
3,851,369,286
5,132,284,238
7,691,601,900
9,753,077,971
12,782,413,204
700%
600%
Percentage
500%
400%
300%
200%
100%
0%
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
100%
138.15%
236.72%
291.76%
388.26%
Current Assets
100%
126.69%
149.97%
201.46%
256.14%
Total Assets
100%
133.26%
199.71%
253.24%
331.89%
Equity
100%
134.62%
179.34%
229.72%
285.20%
100%
124.28%
148.12%
713.60%
492.26%
Current Liabilities
100%
132.62%
240.18%
213.53%
378.34%
Total Liabilities
100%
131.43%
227.06%
284.81%
394.58%
100%
133.26%
199.71%
253.24%
331.89%
28
To conduct a vertical analysis of balance sheet, the total of assets and the total of liabilities and
stockholders equity are generally used as base figures. All individual assets (or groups of assets
if condensed form balance sheet is used) are shown as a percentage of total assets. The current
liabilities, long term debts and equities are shown as a percentage of the total liabilities and
stockholders equity.
To conduct a vertical analysis of income statement, sales figure is generally used as the base and
all other components of income statement like cost of sales, gross profit, operating expenses,
income tax, and net income etc. are shown as a percentage of sales.
The main advantages of vertical analysis are that the balance sheets of businesses of all sizes can
easily be compared. It also makes it easy to see relative annual changes within one business.
4.2.1 VERTICAL ANALYSIS OF INCOME STATEMENT
Table 10: Condensed Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income
RENATA LIMITED
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2013-2010
Item
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
Net Turnover
Cost of sales
Gross Profit
Operating Expenses
Operating Profit
969,517,257
Finance cost
99,513,638
117,473,675
215,315,416
381,110,055
429,297,480
41,151,504
56,480,177
71,941,847
85,618,793
94,267,953
Contribution to
WPFF
823,030,095
Tax Expenses
219,505,643
278,175,022
603,524,452
851,428,532
351,117,807
474,449,485
495,194,525
Total
comprehensive
income
29
Percentage
100.00%
80.00%
60.00%
40.00%
20.00%
0.00%
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
Cost of Sales
47%
47.25%
47.54%
47.18%
49.29%
Gross Profit
53%
52.75%
52.46%
52.82%
50.71%
Operating Expenses
29%
27.08%
26.12%
24.51%
23.20%
Operating Profit
25%
25.78%
26%
28.30%
27.51%
Net Income
0%
19.29%
16.73%
16.26%
15.92%
Turnover
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
Non-Current
Assets
8,573,700,405
Current
4,208,712,799
Assets
Total Assets
Equity
Non-Current
Liabilities
234,362,730
291,256,473
347,143,580 1,672,407,706
1,153,677,518
Current
30
Liabilities
5,333,621,075
Total
6,487,298,593
Liabilities
Total
Liabilities and
Equity
100%
Percentage
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
57%
59.44%
67.96%
66.06%
67.07%
Current Assets
43%
40.56%
32.04%
33.94%
32.93%
Total Assets
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
Equity
Total Liabilities
Total Liabilities and Owner's Equity
57%
57.90%
51.47%
51.99%
49.25%
42.69%
42.10%
48.53%
48.01%
50.75%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
31
Every segment shows strong and consistent growth. Chapter-4 would give the full financial
analysis of the Renata limited.
Figure 5: Trend of Net Turnover
Turnover (Net)
2013
2012
2011
2010
0
Turnover (Net)
2011
6,519,639
2012
7,671,572
2013
8,757,406
500,000
1,000,000
1,500,000
2010
2011
2012
2013
851,428
1,090,634
1,247,275
1,393,928
32
Gross Profit
2013
2012
2011
2010
0
Gross Profit
2011
3,420,283
2012
4,051,959
2013
4,440,631
Dividend
2013
2012
2011
2010
0
Dividend
100,000
2010
153,636
200,000
2011
192,045
300,000
2012
240,056
400,000
2013
353,023
33
Taka
25
20
15
10
5
0
2010
2011
2012
2013
24.15
30.81
35.34
39.38
8.5
8.5
8.5
2.8
Taka
6,000,000
5,000,000
4,000,000
3,000,000
2,000,000
1,000,000
0
2010
2011
2012
2013
5,090,318
6,519,639
7,671,572
8,757,406
851,428
1,090,634
1,247,275
1,393,928
Dividend
153,636
192,045
240,056
353,023
Turnover (Net)
34
Axis Title
4,000,000
3,000,000
2,000,000
1,000,000
0
2010
2011
2012
2013
Current Assets
2,063,325
2,464,125
3,310,221
4,208,713
Current Liabilities
1,851,205
3,385,850
2,876,857
5,333,621
851,428
1,090,634
1,247,275
1,393,928
35
company whose ratio falls outside the range may be regarded as grossly undervalued or
overvalued, depending on the ratio.
For example, if the average P/E ratio of all companies in the S&P 500 index is 20, with the
majority of companies having a P/E between 15 and 25, a stock with a single-digit P/E would be
considered undervalued, while one with a P/E of 50 would be considered overvalued. Of course,
this ratio would typically only be considered as a starting point, with further analysis required to
identify if these stocks are really as undervalued or overvalued as the P/E ratios suggest.
As well, ratios are usually only comparable across companies in the same sector, since an
acceptable ratio in one industry may be regarded as too high in another. For example, companies
in sectors such as utilities typically have a high debt-equity ratio, but a similar ratio for a
technology company may be regarded as unsustainably high.
Ratio analysis can provide an early warning of a potential improvement or deterioration in a
companys financial situation or performance. Analysts engage in extensive number-crunching
of the financial data in a companys quarterly financial reports for any such hints.
Successful companies generally have solid ratios in all areas, and any hints of weakness in one
area may spark a significant sell-off in the stock. Certain ratios are closely scrutinized because of
their relevance to a certain sector, as for instance inventory turnover for the retail sector and days
sales outstanding (DSOs) for technology companies.
4.4.2 PROFITABILITY RATIO
A class of financial metrics that are used to assess a business's ability to generate earnings as
compared to its expenses and other relevant costs incurred during a specific period of time. For
most of these ratios, having a higher value relative to a competitor's ratio or the same ratio from a
previous period is indicative that the company is doing well.
Some examples of profitability ratios are profit margin, return on assets and return on equity. It is
important to note that a little bit of background knowledge is necessary in order to make relevant
comparisons when analyzing these ratios.
For instance, some industries experience seasonality in their operations. The retail industry, for
example, typically experiences higher revenues and earnings for the Christmas season.
36
Therefore, it would not be too useful to compare a retailer's fourth-quarter profit margin with its
first-quarter profit margin. On the other hand, comparing a retailer's fourth-quarter profit margin
with the profit margin from the same period a year before would be far more informative.
Profitability Ratio Analysis for the years 2009 to 2013 are given below:
Figure 12: Profitability Ratio Analysis
Percentage
50.00%
40.00%
30.00%
20.00%
10.00%
0.00%
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
53.33%
52.75%
52.46%
52.82%
50.71%
15.47%
16.73%
16.68%
16.26%
15.87%
ROE
27.34%
32.88%
31.39%
27.63%
24.46%
ROA
15.68%
18.96%
16.96%
14.30%
12.34%
ROI
24.72%
26.10%
25.26%
18.50%
18.66%
Depending on the duration of the policy, the liability can last anywhere from a few months to a
few years. Liabilities that end after one year are considered current liabilities.
The amount of money that the financial institution or insurer has to keep readily available to
cover assets is determined by regulators. Regulators examine liquidity ratios to determine
whether the company is complying with its legal requirements. A low overall liquidity ratio
could indicate that the financial or insurance company is in financial trouble, whether from poor
operational management, risk management, or investment management. A high overall liquidity
ratio isnt necessarily good either, especially if current assets represent a high percentage of total
assets. A large proportion of current assets mean that the company may not be earning a high
enough return on assets as it may be focusing too much on liquidity.
Liquidity Ratio Analysis for the years from 2009-2013 are given below:
Table 12: Liquidity Ration Analysis
Item
2009
Current Ratio
2010
2011
2012
2013
116.55%
111.35%
72.78%
109.97%
78.91%
40.28%
42.03%
25.96%
43.97%
29.08%
2010
Current Ratio
2011
2012
2013
38
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
1.01
1.13
1.02
0.88
0.78
11.34
12.38
11.66
10.34
8.82
32
29
31
35
41
Inventory Turnover
1.79
2.03
2.15
2.03
1.86
201
177
167
178
194
39
Acitivity Ratios
13
12
11
10
9
8
Ratio
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
1.02
0.88
0.78
11.66
10.34
8.82
2.03
1.86
1.01
1.12
11.34
12.38
Inventory Turnover
1.79
2.03
2.15
Days
150
125
100
75
50
25
0
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
32
29
31
35
41
201
177
167
178
194
40
41
2009
2010
2011
74.48%
72.72%
94.30%
9.74
11.17
42.69%
7.98
42.10%
48.53%
2012
2013
92.35% 103.05%
5.70
48.01%
5.61
50.75%
4.4.6. OTHERS
There are some other ratios available that can assess the financial position of a company.
Some are listed below with analysis from 2009-2013:
Table 15: Other Ratios Analysis for the years 2009-2013
Item
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
8.50
8.50
8.50
8.50
10.00
20.37%
18.04%
17.66%
24.05%
25.39%
28.87
27.48
25.03
20.93
18.33
42
5.0 CONCLUSIONS
By analyzing all the data including Horizontal Analysis, Vertical Analysis and Ratio
Analysis, it can be concluded that:
5.1 HORIZONTAL ANALYSIS:
5.1.1 INCOME STATEMENT
From Table 7 and Figure 2, the horizontal analysis of condensed income statement from 2010 to
2013, taking 2010 as the base year and comparing the values of 2011, 2012 and 2013 with 2010.
It is seen that the Turnover, Gross profit, Operating profit and Total comprehensive income for
the year increases from 2010 to 2013. Therefore the company is fairly profitable with a
consistence in performance.
5.1.2 BALANCE SHEET
The table-9 shows the horizontal analysis of balance sheet it is seen that the Total asset has
increased by around 139% from 2010, thus showing that the company asset is increasing. The
owners equity increased showing the investing of the in the business, or to increase in profits.
The total current liability decreased from 2012 to 2013 thus showing that the creditors were paid,
but the liability increased showing the company is not efficient enough to have revenue increased
when liability is increased.
5.2 VERTICAL ANALYSIS
5.2.1 INCOME STATEMENT
From Table 11 and Figure 4 showing the Vertical Analysis of the Condensed Income Statement
of Renata Limited from 2009 to 2013, the trend shows that the Cost of Sales has remained almost
constant with a slight jump in the last year. Gross Profit, as such has reduced slightly over the
years. Operating expenses has reduced dramatically, considering the overall COGS being stable.
While Operating Profit has increased gradually over the years, the Net Income has reduced
slightly. Net Income was at its highest in 2010 with 19.2% of Total Turnover and the lowest of
15.92% in 2013.
5.2.2 BALANCE SHEET
Figure 5 and Table 13 shows the Vertical Analysis of Condensed Balance Sheet of Renata
Limited between the years 2009-2013, keeping Total Assets and Total Liabilities and Owners
43
Equity as the base, it is seen that On Current Assets increased gradually between years 2009 and
2010 followed by a slight drop from 68% to about 66% in 2012 which it recovered to some
extent in 2013. Current Assets on the other hand shows a gradual decrease with only 2012
showing a slight increase from 32% to 34%. Overall, Current Assets decreased from 43% to 33%
between 2009 and 2013. Equity saw a major decrease between 2009 and 2013, falling from 57%
to 50% over the years with only a slight increase in 2010 from 57% to 58%. Total Liabilities was
the only portion that showed a gradual increase from 2009s 43% to 51% in 2013.
5.3 FINANCIAL TREND ANALYSIS
Figure 6 shows the gradual increase of Turnover from 2010 to 2013. Between the years, it
increased from BDT 5 million to BDT 8.75 million. Figure 7 shows Total Comprehensive
Income also showed strong growth increasing from BDT 0.85 million to almost BDT 1.4 million
between 2010 and 2013. Figure 8 shows Dividend increased gradually over the years from BDT
0.15 million in 2010 to BDT 0.35 million in 2013, with a major increase in 2013 from BDT 0.24
million. Figure 10 shows that while EPS has increased dramatically over the years from just
BDT 24.15 in 2010 to 39.38 in 2013, DPS remained constant between 2010 and 2012 at 8.5 with
a sudden decrease to 2.8 in 2013.
Figure 12 compares the Current Asset, Liabilities and Total Comprehensive Income. It is seen
that Current Liabilities seems to have an unstable record with a sudden increase in 2011 followed
by a major dip in 2012 and a much strong comeback in 2013. This shows that the company takes
a number of short term loans which, however, does not seem to show much positive effect on the
profitability of the company.
5.4 PROFITABILITY RATIO
Profitability Ratios of Renata Limited, as shown in Table 14 and Figure 13, is seen to have a
slow but steady decline with 53.33% in 2009 to 50.71% in 2013. The trend of Net Profit Margin
however is unstable, with ups and downs between the years. ROE showed strong increase in
2010 with a strong jump from 27.34% to 32.88% which was shadowed by ROA increasing from
15.67% to 18.96%. Both then continued to a gradual drop with ROE ending up at 24.46% and
ROA at 12.34% in 2013. EPS however has increased over the years from BDT 17.1 in 2009 to
BDT 39.38 in 2013.
44
45
46