Professional Documents
Culture Documents
HBRC Journal
http://ees.elsevier.com/hbrcj
KEYWORDS
Response-2000;
Shear capacity;
Concrete beams
Abstract The program Response-2000 developed at the University of Toronto by Evan C. Bentz
(1) was used in this research to obtain shear strength predictions. This program allows users to analyze beams and columns subjected to moment, shear, and axial loads comprising virtually any type
of beam geometry, material types, and material properties. The fundamental theory supporting the
program is the Modied Compression Field Theory (MCFT).
Member response analysis and sectional analysis were both used in Response-2000 to predict the
behavior of the beams. Member response calculates the full member behavior including the deection and curvature along the member length, as well as predicted failure modes. The analysis was
performed by specifying the length subjected to shear and any constant moment region. Response2000 provided a very good prediction of experimental behavior when compared to a database of
534 beams tested in shear. These include prestressed and reinforced sections, very large footing-like
sections, sections made with very high strength concrete and elements with unusual geometry. All
are predicted well. The results include that Response-2000 can predict the failure shear with an
average experimental over predicted shear ratio of 1.05 with a coefcient of variation of 12%. This
compares favorably to the ACI 318-08 [2] Code prediction ratios that have an average of 1.20 and a
coefcient of variation of 32%.
2012 Housing and Building National Research Center. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V.
All rights reserved.
Introduction
1687-4048 2012 Housing and Building National Research Center. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hbrcj.2012.09.005
100
I.M. Metwally
Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Evaluate the capability and accuracy of response-2000 program in prediction of the shear
Fig. 3
101
102
Table 1
Reference
Loading
Depth, mm
fc, MPa
Stirrups Avfy/bws
Response-2000
M
COV, %
COV, %
MacGregor [4]
Kani et al. [5]
Ghannoum [6]
Moody et al. [7]
Adebar and Collins [8]
Taylor [9]
Shahawy and Batchelor [10]
83 Prestressed I beams
43 rectangular beams
16 rectangular beams
28 rectangular beams
21 rectangular beams
15 rectangular beams
25 full-size Prestressed
bridge girders
16 rectangular beams
9 round columns
34 Prestressed I beams
28 rectangular beams
5 rectangular beams
12 rectangular beams
12 rectangular beams
62 T-beams
305
152 to
220 to
305
210 to
150 to
1118
16 to 52
17 to 35
34 to 58
6.1 to 41.2
46 to 59
22 to 34
42
0 to 3.6
0
0
0
0 to 1.3
0
0 to 12
1.12
1.05
1.10
1.02
0.96
0.99
1.05
12.5
9.1
12.5
10.4
12.8
8.3
9.6
1.27
1.12
1.39
1.7
1.23
1.09
19.5
24.4
11.2
66.4
13.6
14.2
500 to 1000
445
256 and 457
125 to 1000
300 to 3000
750
1000
470
50
23
40
36
19
36
21
13
91
40
70
99
29
87
80
44
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
to 1
to 0.35
to 4.8
1.02
1.06
1.12
1.05
1.02
1.05
0.95
1.09
8.2
6.4
8.2
16.8
10.9
11.2
15.4
11.1
0.88
1.33
1.15
0.89
0.74
1.14
0.74
1.1
12.4
24.2
9.7
29.2
46.3
14.4
23.8
8.9
457
457
360
635 to
250 to
615
1050
330 to
406 to
31
31
58
72
64
29
25
25
25
82
125
89
45
60
0 to 0.57
0 to 0.77
0 to 0.71
0 to 8.1
0.6 to 1.48
7.41 to 15.4
4.02 to 6.03
0
0 to 2.0
0.98
1.02
1.09
0.95
1.03
1.01
1.08
1.05
1.02
9.1
13.1
10.3
11.7
12.8
9.7
4.9
9.4
11.1
0.98
1.05
1.34
1.06
1.51
1.7
1.5
0.98
1.71
8.6
10
14.7
25.3
11.5
19.6
12.2
28
55
1.05
12.0
1.20
32
13 T-beams
15 T-beams
12 rectangular beams
10 rectangular beams
33 rectangular beams
16 I-beams
7 I-beams
8 rectangular beams
5 rectangular beams
4 I-beams
2 Interlock hoop
534 beams
1219
960
410
1000
864
600
2200
610
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to 50
to
to
to
to
0.83
2.7
4.8
0.35
ACI 318-08
I.M. Metwally
Evaluate the capability and accuracy of response-2000 program in prediction of the shear
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Experimental to predicted shear strength of beams versus shear span to depth ratio.
103
104
I.M. Metwally
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Evaluate the capability and accuracy of response-2000 program in prediction of the shear
Fig. 9
105
References
[1] E.C. Bentz, Sectional Analysis of Reinforced Concrete
Members, PhD thesis, Department of Civil Engineering,
University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada, 184 (2000).
[2] ACI Committee, Building Code Requirements for Reinforced
Concrete (ACI 318-08), American Concrete Institute 318 (2008).
[3] F.J. Vecchio, M.P. Collins, The modied compression eld
theory for reinforced concrete elements subjected to shear, ACI.
J. 83 (2) (1986) 219231.
[4] J.G. MacGregor, Strength and Behavior of Prestressed Concrete
Beams with Web Reinforcement, PhD thesis, Uinversity of
Illinois at Urbana Champaign, 295 (1960).
[5] M.W. Kani, M.W. Huggins, R.R. Wittkopp, Kani on Shear in
Reinforced Concrete, University of Toronto Press, Toronto,
1979, 225.
106
[19] M.J. Haddadin, S.T. Hong, A.H. Mattock, Stirrup Effectiveness
in Reinforced Concrete Beams with Axial Force, J. Struc. Div.
Proc. ASCE. 97 (ST9) (Sept. 1971) 22772297.
[20] G.P. Pasley, S. Gogoi, D. Darwin, and S.L. McCabe, Shear
Strength of Continuous Lightly Reinforced T-Beams, SM
Report No. 26, University of Kansas, Dec. 151 (1990).
[21] M.N. Palaskas, and D. Darwin, Shear Strength of lightly
Reinforced T-Beams. SM Report No. 3, University of Kansas,
Center for Research, Lawrence, Kansas, Sept., 198 (1980).
[22] G. Ozcebe, U. Ersoy, T. Tankut, An Evaluation on the
Minimum Shear Reinforcement Requirements for Higher
Strength Concrete, Medium, and High-Strength Conc. Beams,
ACI Struc. J. 96 (3) (1999).
[23] J.J. Roller, H.G. Russell, Shear Strength of High-strength
Concrete Beams with Web Reinforcement, Medium, and HighStrength Conc. Beams, ACI Struc. J. 87 (2) (1990) 191
198.
[24] P.Y. Kong, B. Rangan, Shear Strength of High-Performance
Concrete Beams, Medium, and High-Strength Conc. Beams,
ACI Struc. J. 95 (6) (1998) 677688.
I.M. Metwally
[25] B. Rangan, Web Crushing Strength of Reinforced and
Prestressed Concrete Beams, Medium, and High-Strength
Conc. Beams, ACI Struc. J. 88 (1) (1991) 1216.
[26] F. Levi, P. Marro, Shear Tests up to Failure of Beams made
with Normal and High Strength Concrete, CEB Bulletin 193,
Lausanne, Switzerland, Dec. 1989.
[27] Kawano, H. and Watanabe, H., Shear Strength of Reinforced
Concrete Columns-Effect of Specimen Size and Load Reversal,
Proceedings of the Second Italy-Japan Workshop on Seismic
Design and Retrot of Bridges, Feb. 1997; Rome, Italy.
[28] P.R. Gupta, Behavior of Reinforced Concrete Elements
Subjected to High Compression and Shear, Ph.D. Thesis,
Dept. of Civil Eng., University of Toronto, (1998).
[29] B. Arbesman, The Effects of Stirrups Cover and Amount of
Reinforcement on Shear Capacity of Reinforced Concrete
Beams, M. Eng. Thesis, Dept. of Civil Eng., University of
Toronto, (1975).
[30] S. Kuzmanovic, An Investigation of the Shear Design of a
Reinforced Concrete Box Structure, M. Sc. Thesis, Dept. of
Civil Eng., University of Toronto, 126 (1998).