Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Page 1 of 5
2013 Society of Critical Care Medicine
Case Scenario 1
A 70-year-old man with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)
presents with a complaint of increasing dyspnea and cough for the last
several days. He is on home oxygen (3 L/min nasal cannula) and has
been using his home nebulizer every 2 hours for the past day without
relief. His vital signs on presentation reveal: T 36C (96.8F), P 125
beats/min, R 28 breaths/min, BP 155/90 mm Hg, SpO2 92% on oxygen at
5 L/min by nasal cannula. He is breathing with the use of accessory
muscles and is only able to speak in 1- to 2-word answers before
becoming acutely short of breath. His chest radiograph demonstrates
hyperinflation without infiltrates. His arterial blood gas data reveal: pH
7.23, PaCO2 75 mm Hg (9.9 kPa), PaO2 65 mm Hg (8.7 kPa), HCO3 30
mmol/L.
Detection
Q. What factors are important in your assessment of the patients
respiratory status? What information is missing that is important to
his assessment?
[Chapter 1, Assessment]
Q. How would you interpret the arterial blood gas information?
[Chapter 6, Monitoring]
Critical Elements
Notes
Consider using flip chart or board to list vital signs and arterial blood gas
data to work through acid-base status and for comparison to subsequent
data.
Page 2 of 5
2013 Society of Critical Care Medicine
Intervention
Q. How would you initiate NPPV in this patient?
Type of ventilator
Type of interface
Mode
Inspiratory positive airway pressure (IPAP)
Expiratory positive airway pressure (EPAP)
FIO2
[Chapter 5, Mechanical Ventilation; text and Table 5-4]
Page 3 of 5
2013 Society of Critical Care Medicine
The patient now appears more comfortable and his ABG data show pH
7.31, PaCO2 65 mm Hg (8.7 kPa), and PaO2 105 mm Hg (13.9 kPa).
[Chapter 6, Monitoring]
Reassessment
Q. The on-call hospitalist evaluates the patient and decides to admit
him to a general medical unit. Is this an appropriate care location
for this patient?
Q. How would you determine if NPPV has failed and intubation with
invasive mechanical ventilation is needed?
A. Increase IPAP (increase the difference between IPAP and EPAP). If tidal
volume is too high, IPAP should be decreased to use the lowest pressure
needed to achieve adequate ventilation and optimize patient comfort.
A. EPAP can be increased to improve oxygenation (similar to positive endexpiratory pressure), and/or the FIO2 can be increased. To maintain the
difference between EPAP and IPAP, some ventilators require that IPAP be
increased by the same amount as the EPAP.
A. Teaching and coaching the patient can result in improved acceptance. The
patient should understand the reasons for the device and, before mask
placement, should be told what to expect with regards to air pressure and
coverage of the mouth/nose. One technique, which can be of great value, is
asking the patient to lightly place the mask on his/her face for familiarization
before strapping the mask in place. Patients must also be taught how to
remove the mask in the event of intolerance or emesis.
Notes
Compare ABG data to initial ABG. Ask participants to identify the changes:
lower PCO2 and increased pH with increased PaO2. Note that the increase in
pH is secondary to an acute respiratory alkalosis. The anticipated change in
pH can be calculated from the formula: Increase in pH = 0.08 (change in
PaCO2)/10 = 0.08 (75-65)/10 = 0.08 1= 0.08.
A. No. Providers must recognize that the patient is on a mechanical ventilator
and requires a high level of nursing supervision and monitoring for his acute
respiratory condition. NPPV does not reduce the need for close monitoring. A
disposition to a critical care unit or intermediate care unit would be more
appropriate as patients on NPPV may decompensate precipitously with little or
no warning.
A. Indications to proceed to intubation include failure to significantly improve
within 1-2 hours, inability to achieve therapeutic goals within 4-6 hours, patient
intolerance of NPPV, or a change in the patients condition that makes him a
poor candidate for NPPV (eg, hemodynamic instability).
Page 4 of 5
2013 Society of Critical Care Medicine
Case Scenario 2
A 55-year-old homeless man presents with fever and cough productive of
copious thick green secretions. He is confused and resists attempts of
care. His vitals on presentation reveal: T 39.2C (102.5F), P 140
beats/min, R 40 breaths/min, BP 90/45 mm Hg, SpO2 95% on high-flow
oxygen. His chest radiograph confirms a multilobar pneumonia. Arterial
blood gas results are as follows: pH 7.32, PaCO2 38 mm Hg (5 kPa),
PaO2 70 mm Hg (9.4 kPa), HCO3 19 mmol/L
Detection
Q. Is this patient an appropriate candidate for NPPV?
Q. What characteristics make him a poor candidate for NPPV?
Intervention
Q. What interventions should be instituted?
Critical Elements
Notes
Consider listing vital signs on board or flip chart for discussion.
A. No
A. He has a lung condition (pneumonia) that is less likely to respond to NPPV.
Other concerning findings are copious secretions, altered mental status, and
hemodynamic instability.
A. Work through on board/flip chart using the traditional approach:
pH indicates acidemia.
Respiratory or metabolic? HCO3 is decreased, which suggests a
metabolic acidosis, and near normal PaCO2 does not suggest a
respiratory process.
Is respiratory compensation appropriate? Use formula to calculate
expected PaCO2, which is close to expected.
Anion gap? Unable to calculate with current information.
Presence of metabolic acidosis is another concerning finding that would
suggest sepsis and weigh against using NPPV.
A. Intubation and mechanical ventilation.
Page 5 of 5
2013 Society of Critical Care Medicine